Revision as of 22:44, 15 October 2018 editSennen goroshi (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers5,008 edits →Bye← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 05:31, 20 December 2019 edit undoAnomieBOT (talk | contribs)Bots6,559,218 editsm Substing templates: {{Uw-blockindef}}. See User:AnomieBOT/docs/TemplateSubster for info. | ||
(56 intermediate revisions by 19 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{retired}} | |||
'''I do tend to delete messages when they are no longer relevant, so don't take offence if/when your message goes the way of the ]''' | |||
⚫ | == A note == | ||
You have a long history here, and that gets you at least some right to indulgence. Everyone has stressful periods. Talk page access is revoked right now for you, but if you do decide to come back once your equilibrium is restored I will support an appeal. I understand how you feel, I think your reactions were misguided but I have felt the same myself on occasion and have taken Wikibreaks to manage it. I hope you will be back one day. ''']''' <small>(])</small> 10:25, 13 December 2019 (UTC) | |||
:{{ping|JzG}} Not certain. But, I think an 'indef block' plate is required for the user's page, thus replacing the 'retirement' plate. ] (]) 14:01, 13 December 2019 (UTC) | |||
Added ] (]) 05:30, 20 December 2019 (UTC) | |||
⚫ | == |
||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px">]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been ''']''' ''']''' from editing for ]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the ], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. </div></div><!-- Template:uw-blockindef --> | |||
== User is currently blocked, not retired == | |||
The Atom is not street legal in many countries --<span style="font:bold 11px Kristen ITC;padding:0 3px 0 4px">>]</span> <sup>]·]</sup> 14:19, 20 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
See block log for details. ] (]) 05:28, 20 December 2019 (UTC) | |||
:Are you sure? which countries? also they dont beat Ferrari in NA engines and has nothing to do with this case --<span style="font:bold 11px Kristen ITC;padding:0 3px 0 4px">>]</span> <sup>]·]</sup> 17:28, 20 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
:: In the States - and while they are irrelevant to the highest NA engine issue, it is relevant that they are considered production cars, despite not being road legal in certain countries. --] (]) 06:37, 21 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
:Dont mix production and street legal cars, those are still "cars" not some kit track boxes on wheels, Ill bet some countries could have Formula1 car as street legal, we need to see larger picture, and those are most probably street legal in many more countries than Atom or Caparo, USA is also large exemption for European cars, they have such strick laws for import cars --<span style="font:bold 11px Kristen ITC;padding:0 3px 0 4px">>]</span> <sup>]·]</sup> 07:05, 21 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
:The Atom is mosty likely street legal car as many country as McLaren isnt --<span style="font:bold 11px Kristen ITC;padding:0 3px 0 4px">>]</span> <sup>]·]</sup> 07:09, 21 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
== Notification of automated file description generation == | |||
Your upload of ] or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page. | |||
This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions ]. Thanks!<!--Template:Un-botfill--> ''Message delivered by ] (])'' 14:59, 14 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
== Jules Bianchi == | |||
You just literally revert-warred unsourced, unsigned anon speculation about the condition of a living person into an article talk page. I'm stunned speechless. You must know how inappropriate this is — Misplaced Pages talk pages are not forums for discussion or speculation about anything, much less whether someone's alive or dead. Please don't do it again. ] (]) 08:59, 5 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
wikipedia policy allows for speculation on talk pages. ] (]) 09:27, 5 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
:You are reverting to a vandalised version saying that Bianchi has died. '''Stop immediately''' or I will report you to an admin. ] (]) 09:28, 5 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
:: It is speculation, no one knows if he is dead on not. Would you like a link to the meaning of the word speculation? ] (]) 09:30, 5 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
:::What is the matter with you? You want to keep someone's idiotic vandal edit saying Bianchi has died, with no basis in fact whatsoever? Keep it up, I will report you. ] (]) 09:31, 5 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
:::: Did you see the crash? Did you see what he hit? Unfortunately, there is a reasonable chance that he did actually die. It is valid speculation, not vandalism. Don't spam my talk page again. ] (]) 09:33, 5 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
:::::Yes, I saw the accident, or as much as US television showed. I also used to work in professional motor racing, and I've had to write press releases for serious crashes and driver injuries. For fuck's sake, have some respect for Jules, his team and the F1 community; if you want to run around speculating about someone who may well be fighting for their life right now, Reddit and 4chan are thataway. ] (]) 09:42, 5 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
:: Don't ever swear on my page again, or you will have all your comments removed. I didn't speculate anything, I merely supported another wikipedian's right to do so. Take a look at who made which edit, before you accuse me of anything. If the speculation had been made on the article page, I would have removed it. Talk pages are the correct place for speculation. ] (]) 09:47, 5 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
:::Speaking as someone who's seen the various post-crash photos posted to Twitter, Facebook, and reliable media sources, I'm going to say that there's a difference between my having speculated (on ]) that the "surgery to reduce severe bruising to the head" that his father reported is actually surgery to reduce intracranial pressure by draining a ] under a closed head fracture and possibly swelling due to brain bruising (and acknowledging that it would be a MASSIVE ] violation to actually put this in articlespace), and an IP cruising by to insert an unsourced and unexplained "he just died" on the talkpage after another IP had just had a clumsy attempt at tagging the article "DECEASED" reverted. One is speculation; the other is trolling. ] (]) 13:14, 5 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
:::: If you feel that strongly about it, you are on the wrong talk page. I personally can't read minds and am unable to comment regarding the motivation behind the edits made by the anon IP editor. But then again, I tend to have good faith in all editors, so I will assume he was not trolling and actually thought the guy had died. ] (]) 16:08, 5 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
<!--Template:IAV!--> | |||
== ] == | |||
{{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 17:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692057745 --> | |||
== File:Car collection.jpg listed for discussion == | |||
] A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw --> ] <sup>]</sup> 12:28, 9 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
== DS alert == | |||
{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' | |||
You have recently shown interest in the ] topic area. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called ] is in effect: any administrator may impose ] on editors who do not strictly follow ], or any ], when making edits related to the topic. | |||
For additional information, please see the ] and the ] decision ]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. | |||
}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> | |||
--] (]) 17:40, 8 October 2018 (UTC) | |||
== Message on Heat-not-burn tobacco product == | |||
Hi, Sennen goroshi. I left you a message at ]. Please leave me an answer there, as I won't be watching here. Thanks! ] (]) 04:56, 13 October 2018 (UTC) | |||
== Bye == | |||
You stay off my talk page permanently. Bye. --] (]) 22:39, 15 October 2018 (UTC) | |||
:: Sure. I don't see any need to comment on your talk page. I will however remove personal attacks as per . It's probably better than having someone report you. ] (]) 22:44, 15 October 2018 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 05:31, 20 December 2019
Retired This user is no longer active on Misplaced Pages.A note
You have a long history here, and that gets you at least some right to indulgence. Everyone has stressful periods. Talk page access is revoked right now for you, but if you do decide to come back once your equilibrium is restored I will support an appeal. I understand how you feel, I think your reactions were misguided but I have felt the same myself on occasion and have taken Wikibreaks to manage it. I hope you will be back one day. Guy (help!) 10:25, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
- @JzG: Not certain. But, I think an 'indef block' plate is required for the user's page, thus replacing the 'retirement' plate. GoodDay (talk) 14:01, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Added Buffs (talk) 05:30, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
User is currently blocked, not retired
See block log for details. Buffs (talk) 05:28, 20 December 2019 (UTC)