Misplaced Pages

Talk:Che Guevara: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:07, 8 November 2006 edit208.65.188.149 (talk) →Citation for political dissidents← Previous edit Latest revision as of 03:30, 24 December 2024 edit undoAldrich.Faithful (talk | contribs)5 edits →Che was a mass murderer 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{talkheader}} {{Talk header}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|class=GA|vital=yes|blp=no|listas=Guevara, Che|1=

{{WikiProject Biography|military-work-group=yes|military-priority=top|politician-work-group=yes|politician-priority=top|core=yes}}

{{WikiProject Socialism|importance=top}}
__FORCETOC__
{{WikiProject Military history|class=GA|Biography=yes|South-American=yes|Cold-War=yes}}

{{WikiProject Argentina|topic=hist|importance=Top}}
<center><div style="background-color: #f0f0ff; border: wide; padding: 5px;">
{{WikiProject Cuba|importance=Top}}
{{archive box|
{{WikiProject Caribbean|importance=High}}
],
{{WikiProject Basque}}
],
{{WikiProject Politics|importance=mid}}
],
{{WikiProject Atheism|importance=mid}}
],
{{WikiProject Bolivia|importance=mid|Selected=yes}}
<br>
{{WikiProject History|importance=}}
],
]
]
]
<br>
]
<br>
]
<br>
]<br>
<br>
]
}} }}
{{Not a forum}}
</div></center>
{{Article history
|action1=FAC
|action1date=06:42, 3 Aug 2004
|action1link=Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/Archived nominations/July 2004#Che Guevara
|action1result=not promoted


|action2=FAC
==Introduction==
|action2date=12:54, 3 Sep 2004
===Evaluations, etc.:===
|action2link=Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/Archived nominations/September 2004#Che Guevara
{{featured|GA=yes}}
|action2result=not promoted
{{Mainpage date|June 18|2006}}
|action2oldid=5700626
{{V0.5|class=FA|category=History}}
{{WPCD}}
{{Communism Portal selected|biography}}
{| class="messagebox standard-talk"
|-
|]&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;]
<center>( NB: this English version was the first to become a "Featured Article", receiving its gold star on 12 March 2006. )</center>
|-
|}
<center>
''An event mentioned in this article is an ]''.</center>


|action3=PR
<!--
|action3date=22:38, 16 December 2005
{{oldpeerreview}}
|action3link=Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Che Guevara/archive1
{{GA}}
|action3oldid=31662411
-->


===Projects:===
{{WPMILHIST|class=FA}}
{{WPBiography|class=FA|priority=Top|core=yes}}
{{WPArgentina|topic=hist|importance=Top|class=FA}}


===Please read before you write:===
{{Controversial-ital-bold}}
{{Jimboresourcing}}


|action4=GAN
== Opinions requested ==
|action4date=14:21, 19 December 2005
|action4result=listed
|action4oldid=31968852


|action5=FAC
Hello everybody -- I have some concerns about the following sentence in the lead paragraph of the CG article and would like to know if they are shared by others. Here is the sentence under discussion:
|action5date=11:45, 10 March 2006
|action5link=Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/Che Guevara/archive1
|action5result=promoted
|action5oldid=43115765


|action6=FAR
:'''Through these experiences he became convinced that only revolution could remedy the region's economic inequality, leading him to study Marxism and become involved in Guatemala's social revolution under President Jacobo Arbenz Guzmán.'''
|action6date=12:48, 23 April 2008
|action6link=Misplaced Pages:Featured article review/Che Guevara/archive1
|action6result=removed
|action6oldid=207517874


| action7 = GAN
In order of importance, my concerns are: (i) I am not sure that what Arbenz did/was doing in Guatemala qualifies as a "social revolution"; (ii) I question whether it is accurate to state that CG was "involved in Guatemala's social revolution" (or whatever else it might be called) since, to the best of my knowledge, he was more of an onlooker than a participant; (iii) I don't think that the phrase "the region's economic inequality" is the optimal choice as it does not make it clear whether the inequality in question was among people within the region (i.e., a markedly skewed distribution of income) or an inequality in GDP between "the region" and some other unspecified region.
| action7date = 20:26, 28 August 2009
| action7link = Talk:Che Guevara/GA1
| action7result = listed
| action7oldid = 310600306


| currentstatus = FFA/GA
I would appreciate hearing from other editors whether they consider my concerns to be serious ones that should be addressed or whether they consider that the sentence is fine "as is". Thank you -- ] 05:31, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
| topic = socsci


|maindate=June 18, 2006
:Arbenz's plan seems to have been more agrarian reform than social revolution and agreed CG seems to have been more the onlooker than a participant based on a google search and the ] article does not mention CG.--] 06:42, 30 October 2006 (UTC)


|otd1date=2004-10-08|otd1oldid=6486377
::I think the sentence is incorrect - in both Guevara's involvement (or lack of) in Guatemala's internal politics - and in the description of the "social revolution". As Dakota notes, Arbenz was primarily instituting land reforms. It may be considered a social revolution - and I'm sure it was the objective of some in the Arbenz administration, as well as the belief of some in Washington - but to call it such here gives perhaps a false impression of a Cuba style radical transformation. Though I haven't come up with any wording to improve that sentence, so I'm all ears.--] 02:43, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
|otd2date=2005-10-08|otd2oldid=25078099

|otd3date=2006-10-08|otd3oldid=79971650
== Changes proposed to improve readability, Part I ==
|otd4date=2009-10-07|otd4oldid=318560887

|otd5date=2010-10-07|otd5oldid=389306797
Fellow editors: Please take a look at this to see the changes that ] made to the CG article and that I have rolled back pending discussion of them here on the Discussion page and express your opinions as to whether they should be included or not. Many thanks -- ] 02:28, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
|otd6date=2011-10-08|otd6oldid=454428297

|otd7date=2013-10-08|otd7oldid=576096069
:Brian is on the right track in trying to improve readability, however I feel the previous wording - though more elaborate - was more accurate and grammatically correct.--] 02:36, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
|otd8date=2017-10-08|otd8oldid=804314895

|otd9date=2019-10-08|otd9oldid=920091451
::Zleitzen, I concur 100% with your evaluation. Furthermore, in several places the re-wording has given rise to inaccuracies: for example, CG did not travel rough in order "to bring himself into direct contact with the ]", but rather because his financial straits made that the only method of travel available to him. -- ] 04:08, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
|otd10date=2022-10-08|otd10oldid=1114803432

}}{{User:MiszaBot/config
:::I'm afraid I have to agree with you two, but I will say that the "powerlessness of the masses" paragraphs is among my least favorite in the article. If you both indicate some dissatisfaction with that particular paragraph, perhaps I can take a stab at it. ] 05:43, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
|maxarchivesize = 250K
:::::Hi, Dasondas -- Here is one vote for your doing a re-write of that paragraph! -- ] 16:48, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
|counter = 22

|minthreadsleft = 5
:::: I did not mean to kick any hornets nests, I was just researching something else and did some "drive by editting" of some stuff that looked like the original author was using Marx (Karl, not Groucho) as a style guide. That being said, my reasoning for the edit of the description of his motorcycle trip was to bring it in line with the justification listed later in the entry, which reads: "Guevara and the 29-year-old Granado soon set off from their hometown of Alta Gracia astride a 1939 Norton 500 cc motorcycle they named La Poderosa II (English: "the Mighty One, the Second") with the idea of spending a few weeks volunteering at the San Pablo Leper colony in Peru on the banks of the Amazon River." The motorcycle may have been the most economical means to take an extended journey available, but CG had a stated altruistic motive (although it pains me to say so, I am no Che-phile). CG was not poor, he just had the limited means of a man who had not yet come into his own. My research on the matter was simply to read the whole article and look for inconsistancies. The reason that the passage caught my eye was the odd phrase "riding rough" --] 15:07, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
|algo = old(60d)
::::: Also my edit on that passage was mainly to change "riding rough" to "and took an extended motorcycle trip" and to change "did bring" to "to bring" (justification of element of intent above)--] 18:08, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
|archive = Talk:Che Guevara/Archive %(counter)d

}}
To facilitate further discussion of this topic, I am inserting here a side-by-side comparison of the lead paragraph, before and after. ], please notice that the phrase used in the sentence you refer to above that contains the word "rough" is, and always has been, "'''traveling rough'''", not "riding rough". I believe that "riding rough" is what ] and his cohorts did. (''¿El grouchomarxista eres tú?'') -- ] 18:12, 1 November 2006 (UTC)&nbsp;&nbsp;(with apologies to ])
<table width=90% cols=2 align="center" cellpadding=6 border=1 bgcolor="#cef2e0">
<tr><td width=50% align="left" valign="top" colspan=1>
<b>Lead section before changes made by ]<b><br><br>
'''Ernesto Guevara de la Serna''' (], ] &ndash; ], ]), commonly known as '''Che Guevara''' or '''el Che,''' was an ] ] revolutionary, ], and leader of ] and ] ]s. As a young man studying ], Guevara traveled rough throughout ], bringing him into direct contact with the ] in which many people lived. Through these experiences he became convinced that only revolution could remedy the region's economic inequality, leading him to study Marxism and become involved in ]'s ] under President ].
</td>
<td width=50% align="left" valign="top" colspan=1>
<b>Lead section written by ]<b><br><br>
'''Ernesto Guevara de la Serna''' (], ] &ndash; ], ]), commonly known as '''Che Guevara''' or '''el Che,''' was an ] ] revolutionary, ], and leader of ] and ] ]s. As a young man he studied ] and took an extended motorcycle trip throughout ] to bring himself into direct contact with the ] in which many people lived. He later cited these experiences as what convinced him that only revolution could remedy the region's economic inequality, leading him to study Marxism and become involved in ]'s ] under President ].
</td></tr></table>

I think that this is a good opportunity for all of us to try to improve the lead paragraph. I am especially bothered by the third sentence and wonder whether the following would be an improvement:

:'''His experiences and observations during these trips convinced him that only revolution could remedy the region's socioeconomic inequalities, leading him to study Marxism and travel to ] during the presidency of ] to study the reforms being implemented there.

:or perhaps:

:'''His experiences and observations during these trips convinced him that the region's socioeconomic inequalities could only be remedied through revolution, leading him to study Marxism and travel to ] during the presidency of ] to study the reforms being implemented there.'''

-- ] 18:30, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

One of the problems with Brian's version is that Guevara made a number of trips - the motorcycle trip being just one. As stated by Polaris, the reasons for the motorcycle trip were not to bring himself into direct contact with the impoverished conditions - but simply to travel and experience the continent. Also, the phrase "He later cited these experiences as what convinced him that..." is grammatically incorrect. All in all I support the first shorter, more accurate version. Polaris is wise to note that a mention of "]" on an article concerning Cuba could be misleading!--] 18:31, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

:Another one for the mix: '''His experiences and observations during these trips led him to the conclusion that the region's socioeconomic inequalities could only be remedied by revolution, and as a result he took up the study of Marxism and travelled to ] during the presidency of ] to study the reforms being implemented there.''' In particular, I chose ''led him to the conclusion'' instead of ''convinced him'' because the latter could be interpreted has CG coming to recognize an objective truth, whereas the former makes clear that the conlcusion reached was subjective to him. ] 20:12, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

::Hello, Dasondas -- I agree with you about "led" vs. "convinced" and your version is now my first choice. But, how would you feel about substituting "delved into the study of Marxism" for "took up the study of Marxism"? It is, I believe, perhaps a tad more accurate since he already had been reading various Marxist texts in a somewhat superficial fashion (according to his own testimony) before he went on the trips. -- ] 21:25, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

::'''His experiences and observations during these trips led him to the conclusion that the region's socioeconomic inequalities could only be remedied by revolution, and as a result he delved into the study of Marxism and travelled to ] during the presidency of ] to study the reforms being implemented there.'''

:: -- ] 21:25, 1 November 2006 (UTC)


Well they are each an improvement. I would tend to agree with Dasondas that his first sentence is even more neutral. Here's my attempt for what it's worth! "'''His experiences and observations during these trips led him to the conclusion that the region's socioeconomic inequalities could only be remedied by revolution, prompting him to study Marxism and travel to ] to study the reforms being implemented by President ]."--] 20:48, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

::Hello, Zleitzen. I like yours too! But, might I suggest:

:::'''His experiences and observations during these trips led him to the conclusion that the region's socioeconomic inequalities could only be remedied by revolution, prompting him to intensify his study of Marxist literature and travel to ] to witness the reforms being implemented by President ].'''

::I am not certain "witness" is the best word here, but I would like to avoid the repetition of "study". Perhaps one of you will come up with a better verb (I would have used "observe" if it too had not already made an appearance in this sentence ...) -- ] 21:39, 1 November 2006 (UTC)


:Drawing on what I liked about the two previous versions: "'''His experiences and observations during these trips led him to the conclusion that the region's socioeconomic inequalities could only be remedied by revolution, prompting him to intensify his study of Marxism and travel to ] to study the reforms being implemented by President ].'''" ] 21:34, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

::Dasondas, I think that our versions are converging. Would you please check out my latest effort, just above, which is out of sequence because I posted it after you posted your version -- but before I had read yours -- and tell me your thoughts? -- ] 21:46, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

:::How's this? "'''His experiences and observations during these trips led him to the conclusion that the region's socioeconomic inequalities could only be remedied by revolution, prompting him to intensify his study of Marxism and travel to ] to observe the reforms being implemented by President ].'''" I left "Marxism" instead of "Marxist literature" for now, but would like to hear why Polaris substituted the latter. ] 21:34, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

:::::Hi, Dasondas. Well, as I got to thinking about it, Marxism is not exactly the same as Marxist literature and what he was studying during the pre-Guatemala era was actually the latter. However, it is probably not important to make this differentiation.

:::::re "observe", I am still uneasy with it because of "observations" appearing earlier in the sentence. There must be a perfect verb to express what we are trying to, but it is certainly proving elusive! -- ] 22:17, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

::::::The best I've got right now are "Understand", "Gain a perspective of", "Examine", "Take stock of", "View", "See", and "Comprehend". Alternatively we can maintain "observe and substitute "observations" for something like "Impressions", "Perceptions", or even remove the word and just keep "experiences". Hopefully you can work with this Chinese menu and put something together. On the "Marxist" vs. "Marxist literature", by all means use the latter if you think it is more accurate. ] 22:46, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

::::::::What do you think about this version?

::::::::::'''His experiences and observations during these trips led him to the conclusion that the region's socioeconomic inequalities could only be remedied by revolution, prompting him to intensify his study of Marxism and travel to ] to learn about the reforms being implemented there by President ].'''

::::::::-- ] 23:00, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

:::::::::I think you should put it in the article immediately, and if anybody ever tries to change so much as a comma we'll gang up on them all the way to ArbCom (and even to Jimbo himself if that's what it takes) and make sure they're banned until the next millennium. ] 23:13, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

:::::::::With that kind of endorsement, I think we must have a winner! I left a message for Zleitzen asking him to please come to have a look -- ] 00:19, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

::::::::::That's fine by me! --] 00:30, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

== Changes proposed to improve readability, Part II ==

::::::::::: Can the phrase "traveling rough" be taded out for something descriptive like "motorcycle journey." "Traveling rough" may be in common use somewhere, but not everywhere--] 02:17, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

(removing indent) I tend to agree with BrianH and think that something along the lines of "travelled through Latin America by motorcycle" would be both more factual and less stylistically distracting. Any other thoughts? ] 02:23, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

:The problem is that the motorcycle journey was only one of a number of excursions. And even that venture was achieved largely without the help of the machine, which broke down early on. Out of interest, is the term "travelling rough" not a universal expression?--] 02:32, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

::Hi Dasondas -- Sorry to dissent, but I must. CG and AG travelled not only by motorcycle but also by bus, on foot, by hitchiking in trucks and cars, as stowaways on at least one ship, by raft (the ''Mambo-Tango''), by train when they could get onto one, and eventually, in Che's case, by airplane. At one point I had considered listing all of these conveyances but then decided that to do so would be too verbose. Do you feel otherwise? -- ] 02:41, 2 November 2006 (UTC) (posting of this reply was delayed by Editing Conflict but basically I am saying the same thing as Zletizen. BTW to make future discussion easier, I have made this into a new section.)

:::::Well, OK, so much for my suggestion being more factual :) Wrt Zleitzen's query, I had never heard the expression "travelling rough" before reading this article; on the other hand the connotation was immediately clear to me. I do understand where BrianH is coming from, but now given your added detail I'm without any ideas for improvement. ] 02:50, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

::::::But I hope that you are still going to turn your keyboard to the "powerlessness" paragraph! -- ] 02:53, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

:::::::Indeed I plan to. After the free history lesson I just got, I suppose I owe you that much. Although right now I'm wondering if this whole thread needs to be moved from Misplaced Pages to Wikthesaurus. ] 02:58, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

::::::::Dasondas, sometimes I think it would be rather appealing to reduce the whole article to the suggested (humoristically) by Jmabel&nbsp;&nbsp; :-) -- ] 03:06, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

:::::::::Alas, Polaris, you will note that while having the utmost regard for JMabel's work across many articles and in many contexts, and respecting him as an editor with quite a bit more experience than me, at the time of his proposed abridged edition I was forced to raise a rather . Perhaps, though, he will join us in discussion so that we may work together to finally get the definitive version of the TRUTH out. ] 03:48, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
:::::2 options to "travel smoothly": 1)"As a young man studying medicine, Guevara traveled rough throughout Latin America, most famously by motorcycle, but often by other means, bringing him into direct contact with the impoverished conditions in which many people lived." or option 2)"As a young man studying medicine, Guevara traveled rough throughout Latin America, not only by motorcycle but also by bus, on foot, by hitchiking in trucks and cars, as stowaways on at least one ship, by raft (the ''Mambo-Tango''), by train when they could get onto one, and eventually, in Che's case, by airplane. This brought him into direct contact with the impoverished conditions in which many people lived." The information provided by Polaris makes the passage more interesting and clear.--] 14:30, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
::::::Although it wasn't me who added the "traveled rough" to the article and it seems to have been there for a long time - even before this article reached featured status and surviving main page coverage - I feel it would be a shame to lose it. It encapsulates in one word the 39 words it has taken to describe the means and methods of Guevara's adventures above. It's a very old term and is the reason for the title of the ] travel books. It means to travel via improvised methods on a very low budget, in the manner of a ] or ]. So it is an ideal descriptive term for us here. I'm surprised and intrigued by the non-universiality of the expression! Is the expression "sleeping rough" also not known to some?--] 17:21, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
:::::::Since compiling the above list, I have realized that there are two more conveyances that need to be included: his motorized bike (the one in that appears in the ad) and the petrol tanker on which he travelled up and down the eastern coast of South America as a male nurse! Interestingly, although CG was very fond of riding, I know of no evidence that he ever made a trip on horseback ...
:::::::As for "travelling rough", I settled on that phrase after considering various alternatives along the lines being discussed above. It is in common usage among English-speaking travellers in Europe. "Rough" as a descriptor for living and sleeping appears in the dictionaries I have checked, so I hope that people who may not have heard the phrase "travelling rough" before can nevertheless figure out its meaning &mdash; as Dasondas explains he did (above). On the other hand, perhaps it would be interesting to include a list of the numerous conveyances used in a content note. We might attach it to the word "rough", and in addition to the means of transportation we could mention how he/they slept outdoors, in jails, barns, etc. so that readers can get an even more precise understanding of what is meant by "rough". Does this idea appeal to anybody? -- ] 21:21, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
::::::::That sounds like a very good idea, Polaris.--] 04:04, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
:::::::::Thank you, Zleitzen. I'll try to come up with a draft content note tomorrow and post it here so everyone can tweak it. -- ] 04:54, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

:::::::::Zleitzen, in response to your query, I have never before heard the phrase "sleeping rough". I can't discern the meaning as readily as I could for "travelling rough", yet for some reason I find myself rather curious as to whether there is some type of guide (illustrated, perhaps) published on the enjoyments of that activity :) ] 20:09, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

== Powerless masses ==

Rising up and throwing off the shackles of the consensual dialectic, inspired by ] and influenced by more than one scotch, I have published my edits to this most oppobrious of paragraphs. You may revert or edit at will (go ahead, you coward, you will only be killing a paragraph). Those with imperialist administrative powers may even ban me for vandalism (don't think you wouldn't be doing me a favor). ] 06:59, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

:I like the rework very much Dasondas. Good work. --] 07:17, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

::Thank you, Zleitzen. ] 13:51, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

:::My congratulations also, Dasondas. Many thanks for cleaning out that miasma. There are just a couple of little tweaks to the first and second sentences that I would like to present for your consideration:

::::'''Guevara analyzed the widespread poverty, oppression and disenfranchisement that he had witnessed throughout Latin America in the context of his Marxist readings and arrived at the conclusion that the only solution for the region’s inequalities was armed revolution. His travels and readings also led him''' to view Latin America not as a group of separate nations but as a single entity requiring a continent-wide strategy for liberation. His conception of a borderless, united ] sharing a common ']' culture{{cref|Ibero-America}} was a theme that would prominently recur during his later revolutionary activities. Upon returning to Argentina, he expedited the completion of his medical studies in order to resume his travels in ] and ] America and received his diploma on ] 1953.{{cref|Diploma}}

::::I look forward to your comments ... -- ] 20:05, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

:::::The second of your suggested changes ('''His travels and readings also led him''') is OK and should probably be retained in the article. The first suggestion, though, is ambiguous in that it's not clear whether the phrase "in the context of his Marxist readings" is modifying the verb "analyzed" (as you intended) or the verb "witnessed" (which makes less contextual sense, but is the grammatically logical association). The sentence could be modified to begin, '''Guevara analyzed, in the context of his Marxist readings, the widespread poverty, oppression and disenfranchisement that he had witnessed...'''. Another possibility that I had considered, that was closest to the pre-existing sentence structure and is similar in meaning to your suggested change is, '''Witnessing the widespread poverty, oppression and disenfranchisement throughout Latin America, and influenced by his readings of Marxist literature, Guevara decided that the only solution for the region’s inequalities was armed revolution.''' The change I made to the grammatical structure, while subtle, was calculated to place more responsibility on Guevara the man for the decisions he made -- his Marxist readings being an influencing, but secondary factor. I still prefer my version but would welcome further discussion. ] 19:59, 4 November 2006 (UTC)


== Views in Argentina ==
::::::Hello Dasondas. I like your second version much better. The discomfort I have with the sentence as it now appears in the article is that the subject, "Guevara", is sandwiched in between the two descriptive phrases and seems (to me) to be somewhat overwhelmed by them.


I travelled extensively in Argentina and the views on Guevara were unanimous; he is rarely mentioned there and is certainly not a source of pride. Many I met described him as a "psychopath" who enjoyed killing people. He apparently told his father that he "enjoyed the smell of cordite and blood" after he had shot someone through the head.
::::::Would you perchance have a minute to take a look at the recent change made by ] removing the adjective "beloved" from the sentence re CG's Grandmother Ana Isabel Lynch? ] commented that he had removed the word because it is "unnecessary". While I do not doubt that it may seem unnecessary to some, I think that the same accusation could be levelled against almost any other individual word in this article or, for that matter, in any other article. It is widely recognized that Ana Isabel Lynch was one of the most important figures in CG's life -- for example, it was her death from cancer that caused him to switch his intended major from Engineering to Medicine -- and I feel that she should be singled out in some way. If you do not like the word "beloved", could you perhaps suggest an alternative? -- ] 21:15, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
Not sure if this is worth extra exploration. ] (]) 17:03, 7 September 2023 (UTC)


:It definitely isn't, I for one know plenty of Argentinians that are in awe of Guevara. Hearsay is not worth being mentioned on Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 12:45, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
:::::::Polaris, I made the edit to the former "powerless masses" paragraph to reflect our discussion above. See how it looks. As to "beloved", I think it's entirely appropriate and not unnecessary at all to highlight CG's fondness for his grandmother in order to distinguish her central influence on him, in contrast to other family members. IMO "beloved" is perfectly fitting, and I can't think of anything better right now. I'll leave it to you to make the reversion and engage Dwaipayanc in discussion on this point if you want. ] 21:43, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
::Che was a psychopath who enjoyed killing people. He was also a homophobic and racist who hated black people. This is not hearsay. He publicly executed innocent Cubans by gunshot in front of many witnesses as a warning to anyone who tried to oppose their new government. ] (]) 11:55, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
<s>Striking out material from block evader.</s> ] (]) 00:23, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
:{{ping|Grandpallama}} Although I agree that the heresay is irrelevant to our article, I looked at the IP and saw no evidence of block evasion. Is there a link that shows it? If so, it would be helpful if that is mentioned on the IP's talk page in case that editor continues making edits. --] (]) 00:39, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
::], the editor is unlikely to show up with this particular IP again, as it's not static. That said, it's been pointed out to me that the age of the edit is such that I'm probably causing confusion more than helping (which makes sense); I only noticed today that he'd become active again for a while last year and was clearly overzealous ]. I've reverted my strikethrough. ] (]) 06:25, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
:::Okay. --] (]) 06:28, 22 March 2024 (UTC)


== Che was a mass murderer ==
::::::::I think that the former "powerless masses" paragraph reads very well now and should be easily understood by all. In line with your comment re "beloved", I have restored that word and will defend it to the best of my ability, if necessary. -- ] 04:10, 5 November 2006 (UTC)


Please add that Che Guevara was a mass murderer in the first sentence of this article. He should be put in the same category as Hitler. the sentence should read as follows:
No way, Guevara's perception of social conditions in Latin America were inevitable influenced by his marxist upbringing. His very reliance on such theoretical concepts so flawed his view of reality that they led to his, in my view very deserved, doom in Bolivia. El Jigue 11-5-06


was an Argentine ] Mass Murderer, physician, author, ] leader, diplomat, and ]. ] (]) 04:00, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
:EJ, I'm not quite following you. We make the point that his Marxist studies influenced his outlook, decision-making process, and subsequent behavior. Do you think that we haven't made this point strongly enough? ] 18:10, 5 November 2006 (UTC)


:When was he convicted of being a mass murderer? ] (]) 05:39, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
::Indeed, Dasondas just moved that phrase ''forward'' in the sentence in question, giving it even more emphasis! -- ] 19:34, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
::in Cuba he lined up innocent people against a wall “pared” and executed them without a trial for the public to witness. My Cuban family witnessed these executions and knew people who disappeared. He forced at gunpoint the removal of families from their homes. The only way to enforce socialism is to take away everything the people own by execution and physical violence. No one will willingly give the government their possessions. What I stated are facts. ] (]) 11:51, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
:::Then it shouldn't be hard for you to provide some reliable sources here. Facts aren't hard to find in reliable sources. ] (]) 12:48, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
::::Lots of sources exist, but they're very easy for you to ignore. ] (]) 01:23, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
:::::If you have sources, ]. ] (]) 00:46, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
::::::Alvaro Vargas LLosa, ''The Killing Machine; Che Guevara, from Communist Firebrand to Capitalist Brand"'' (Independent Insitiute:July 11, 2005, https://www.independent.org/news/article.asp?id=1535)


::::::Guillermina Stutter Schneider. ''Che Was a Racist, Homophobe, and Mass Murderer'' (Human Progress: December 15, 2017, https://humanprogress.org/the-truth-about-che-guevara-racist-homophobe-and-mass-murderer/)
== Changes proposed by Lavenderbunny ==


::::::Troy J. Sacquety, ''Che Guevara: A False Idol for Revolutionaries'' (U.S Army Special Forces Command History Office: 2008, https://arsof-history.org/articles/v4n4_false_idol_page_1.html#fn:2)
If interested, please take a look at this
to view the changes made on 06 November 06 by ] and which I rolled back pending discussion here. -- ] 17:52, 6 November 2006 (UTC)


::::::These three sources support the idea that Che was ruthless, brutal, and guilty of more than enough human rights violations to earn multiple in-depth paragraphs for this article.
:I can't see any changes that improve the article or readibility, I'm afraid. Again the "rough" has been questioned and removed - it probably needs the speech marks around the word again. I think it was Brian that removed "], when attempting to summarise Guevara's legacy, speculated thus..." replacing it with a mere "Christopher Hitchens commented.." - the reason given was that the former was too "catty". I don't quite understand which aspect of the sentence the "catty" refers to, but I think it needs to be explained that Chris wasn't just pontificating in a vacuum - some sort of context is required.--] 19:51, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
::::::] (]) 03:30, 24 December 2024 (UTC)


== Semantic Error ==
::Hello Zleitzen -- I too was puzzled by by Brian_H's remark but thought that perhaps I was missing something and so left the change ''in place'' for you to decide about ... -- ] 20:01, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
::::I reduced the sentance because all the extra words were unneccessary. Hitchens in an author (his book on Orwell is on my nightstand at the moment, by chance) A link to the Hitchens article was already there. And to use your own word, the passage implies (more or less) that he is "pontificating" (because he is "attempting to summerize" as opposed to ligimately doing so). As many have pointed out, the article is a bit long, so it was not a stretch to trim that particular passage.--] 02:19, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
::Concerning "rough": I can hardly believe the amount of confusion that this straightforward word is generating. It does appear in dictionaries &mdash; for example, the following is from :
:::"Idiom:
:::'''rough it'''
:::To live without the usual comforts and conveniences: roughed it in a small hunting shack."


<ref></ref>{{Edit semi-protected|Che Guevara|answered=yes}}
::(sigh) ... Since it is an accepted idiom in the English language, I see no reason so remove it. As for the speech marks, I had originally included them, then someone removed them and I didn't restore them. Please replace them if you think they are needed. (BTW I am working on the content of the promised content note by going back over the details of ''all'' of his trips to make sure that I have not missed any of the multiple conveyances and sleeping spots used. I should be ready to compose it in a day or so. Perhaps I should include the definition at the beginning of it?) -- ] 20:18, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Please change "Cause of death Execution by shooting" to
"Cause of death Elimination by shooting"


Che Guevara's capture and immediate execution without a legal trial would be more accurately described as an extrajudicial killing which is considered a form of murder. This differs from a lawful execution which typically involves a formal trial. ] (]) 05:31, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
:::You guys have long since convinced me on the "travelling rough" phrase, but since Zleitzen has shown an interest in its idiomatic usage, I thought he'd be interested to know that the example '''rough it''' provided by Polaris above is a term I've been using since childhood. I would naturally say "We roughed it", but I would never say "We travelled rough". Just fyi. But, please, keep fighting to maintain "travelled rough" in the article -- there is no "dominant" English idiom for Misplaced Pages, and I have been convinced that the existing term is perhaps the most elegant description we have in the language for describing Guevara's activities during that period of his life. ] 21:04, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
:{{done}}<!-- Template:ESp --> I replaced it with ] (per what's covered in the article's body). ] (]) 15:17, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
::Can you also take care of the "Battles/wars" section, where he was labeled to be executed after a conviction. ] (]) 10:21, 17 April 2024 (UTC)


== Interview with Tucker Carlson - Ex-CIA Agent Felix Rodriguez on Che Guevara death ==
::::'''Rough''' revisited: I searched for '''travel rough''' in amazon.com and their search engine returned 1963 hits! Among them a book entitled ''The Art of Rough Travel: From the Peculiar to Practical, Advice From a 19th Century Explorer'' (Hardcover), by Francis Galton. -- ] 22:24, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Ex-CIA Agent on Capturing Che Guevara, Who Truly Killed JFK, and Election Predictions


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwohQJrJeo8&ab_channel=TuckerCarlson
:::::Yet, the same entry in Google yields only 884 hits. How peculiar! For comparison Google returns 12,200 hits on the more-or-less randomly selected phrase "What I had for breakfast", and for a more topical comparison the phrase "roughing it" (for which Amazon lists over 9100 books) has 737,000 pages referenced by Google. Hmm, Polaris, another phrase is now coming to mind..."Seizing defeat from the jaws of victory." ] 22:48, 6 November 2006 (UTC)


] was executed in 1967 in a remote Bolivian village. One of the last people to speak to him alive was CIA officer ]. Here’s his story.
:::::::1953 on amazon and 884 on google are quite enough for me &nbsp;;-)&nbsp;&nbsp; -- ] 23:29, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
::::::::Just for the record: "traveling rough" has grown on me and I renounce all previous objections to it. I only offer profound under caffeination as an explaination for my actions. --] 02:27, 7 November 2006 (UTC)


Felix Rodriguez worked for the CIA until 1976.
==Citation for political dissidents==
I need to take a further look at that sentence and citation in reference to "political dissidents". Having written about the post revolution "against the wall" period elsewhere - I need more convincing. The fact that the citation is from the "Black book of communism" raises questions, considering that the immediate post revolution period we are concerned with was not marked by "communist" governance or methods, it seems strange that it should be presented in that book and contradictory to historical accounts of the period. I don't know the book in question I'm afraid. By the way - I'm thinking of the 500 or so executions in the first 6 months or so of 1959. I'll revisit various historical texts to ascertain which executions we are referring to. "Political dissidents" is not something I would necessarily associate with the victims from my previous studies. It may have also been the reason why Polaris added the "citation needed" tag.--] 23:58, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
:I'm open to being convinced. The "Black Book of Communism" is the only thing on my shelf that was on point, so I used it. The book has garnered some controversy since its release, but I believe that most moderate observers would come to the conclusion that it is a serious effort whose primary authors are respected researchers/writers although it is certainly far from being a scholarly treatment and makes no pretense of objectivity. The original is in French, and the version I translated from is in Portuguese; not having seen the original I can't vouch for the French-Portuguese translation, but I am confident in my own abilities to accurately render Portuguese into English. If you want, I can provide the quote in the original language, but I believe that your scepticism is quite a bit more substantive and I'll wait for the results of search. At the end of the day I'd have no problem removing the claim from the article if it proves to be unsustainable, but it might come down to what we mean by political dissidents. Our friend EJ might want to weigh in as well, but seeing as that you, Zletizen, have directly relevant professional expertise you wouldn't find me to be a tough obstacle to move on this point if no other dissenters voiced an opinion in the meantime. ] 00:17, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
:(Potentially mildly humorous update) Also, since Polaris has created the precedent of using Amazon searches as a citable reference here (see above discussion on "rough"), I'll note that the ''Black Book of Communism'' received 4 out of 5 stars from 92 customer reviews at Amazon -- I'm betting that's a broader consensus than we'll get for any academic source :) ] 00:24, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
::::Zleitzen's statement "I need more convincing." sums up my own feeling exactly. Nothing I have read about the period leads me to believe that those executed were other than supporters of the Batista dictatorship, which does not leave room for ''dissidents'' from within the revolutionary forces themselves. Since the first five months after the M-26-7 victory were rather chaotic, I hadn't thought that the situation had reached a degree of clarity such that the concept "dissident" would have had any currency. In the case of ], I have read that it was Guevara who later that same year saved him from the death penalty. BTW have you had a look at ? I believe that this page was originally brought to my attention by our friend EJ. It includes a list of all those individuals executed at La Cabaña during Guevara's tenure for whom the author has been able to find documentary evidence, and the total is only 164; unfortunately, he does not include a description of the charges against each. Anyway, I am definitely no expert on this subject matter and would just like to suggest that we all do our best to bring whatever light we can to bear on this murky period. -- ] 02:12, 7 November 2006 (UTC)


] (]) 16:38, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
:::::I never considered that the source I brought would be sufficient to hold the claim, but I made the edit because I think it is good enough for removing the fact tag and forcing us to come to a consensus about whether the claim stays or goes. I'm completely open on this point and wouldn't suggest that the one source I provided would be enough to pass the high bar of verifiability implied for a featured article on a controversial topic. Btw, I would have been surprised if neither you nor Zleitzen had challenged that source ;) ] 06:29, 7 November 2006 (UTC)


:That's not a reliable source. ] (]) 16:57, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Here's a few accounts to add to the pot.
::It is his own testimony!!! ] (]) 16:58, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
*Richard Gott, in ''Cuba : A new history'' states "several hundred former Batista associates, policemen and torturers were shot by firing squad after perfunctory trials". p168
:::That's not how ] works. ] (]) 16:59, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
*Hugh Thomas, in ''Cuba the pursuit of freedom'', states that 200 people were shot after the tribunals, all for murder or torture. Thomas goes on to say, "many of those shot richly deserved it, by most criteria" p726
::::Edit conflict, "please provide the acronym that supports your logic". LOL. ] (]) 17:01, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
*Angelo Trento, in ''Castro and Cuba'' says that there were approx. 400 capital sentences for "people who had collaborated with Batista's repressive regime"
::::Specifically see points 1 and 2:
*Jon Lee Anderson states the executions were of "deputies, rank and file chivatos and police torturers" p388
::::{{tq|1. The material is neither unduly self-serving nor an exceptional claim 2. It does not involve claims about third parties;}} ] (]) 17:01, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
It would be good to have a strong selection of sources to cover this most controversial section of the page.--] 14:09, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
::::::Wow, you know how to make pretty colored text. I am impressed. LOL. Thanks for making my day, ] LOL. ] (]) 17:02, 7 May 2024 (UTC)


;South Park: Officer Barbrady - There's nothing to see here.
----


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LW6RWSiR88s&ab_channel=MiamiBadBoyBOSS


] (]) 18:37, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
::Indeed EJ appears to be facing a period of dissidence on wikipedia as we write. Another user has taken issue with his refusal to register alongside his robust talk page activity on various pages, I am at present attempting to broker a resolution to ensure his continued participation! --] 00:26, 7 November 2006 (UTC)


== Lies & propaganda surrounding Che. ==
I've brought this up, on the 'talk pages' of ], ] and ]. Though El Jigue, may be a popular (or at least engaging) anon-user, his continuous gossiping on article-related events, are clogging up space. This gossiping should stop, an irresponsible popular anon-user (El Jigue); is still an irresponsible anon user. This gossiping is against Misplaced Pages policy; hey, I didn't set the policies. ] 01:26, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
::::I have posted my comments at ] -- ] 06:11, 7 November 2006 (UTC)


https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/che-guevara-executing-women/
In all probability these numbers are low even for the first six months. Personally I remember the horror of fellow rebels (most front-line rebels disliked executions) when report came in of 100 killed by Raul in a single day in Santiago. However, perhaps the major point is that these executions did not stop after the early months and accelerated as time went on and the resistance known as the "War Against the Bandits" came, grew strong, and was repressed (circa 1967). Total executions in Cuba are usually given as in excess of 10,000, a round and thus imprecise number. "Accidental" shooting deaths were so common in those early days that there were editorials in newspapers still not under governmen control (e.g. Prensa Libre) protesting their occurrence. An very readable account of some of the horror of those early days is given in: Plimpton, George 1977 Shadow box. G.P. Putnam’s Sons. New York. SBN 399119957 especially pp. 143-149. The relationship of Mark Herman to the Che Guevara is not clear to me but I am under the impression that he was under the direct orders of Guevara. El Jigue 11-8-06


Example number 1: The link listed above where the accusation of him “Killing 2 woman” came out including him being accused of being a mass murderer (which is false, the people executed weren't innocent and were those working with Batista, war criminals etc.
=="Che" derived from the Mapuche?==


Example number 2: The accusation that he was responsible for the UMAP camps/Imprisonment of homosexuals.
A correspondent tells me that: "Che, is a colloquial address in Argentina and Paraguay, with roots in the Mapuche indigenous word Che, meaning people. Calling someone Che implies the belonging to one's own people (as paisano is used in Cuban vernacular)." It is a common given among the less educated in Argentina that they are "Europeans" however even the most cursory examination of features of rural and some urban populations demonstrates that they carry indigenous traits. This custom may date from the times of the genocidal tyrant Rosas, when to admit that one was indigenous was not the safest thing in the world. El Jigue 11-8-06
in 1965 Che resigned his position as minister of industries and went to the Congo. He wasn't in Cuba during the operations of the camps and nor was he involved, Castro later took accountability for these camps stating how he failed the LGBT community in Cuba. ] (]) 16:40, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 03:30, 24 December 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Che Guevara article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22Auto-archiving period: 2 months 
This  level-4 vital article is rated GA-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.
WikiProject iconBiography: Military / Politics and Government / Core
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Top-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Top-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is listed on the project's core biographies page.
WikiProject iconSocialism Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconMilitary history: Biography / South America / Cold War
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
Associated task forces:
/ 
Taskforce icon
Military biography task force
Taskforce icon
South American military history task force
Taskforce icon
Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)
WikiProject iconArgentina Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Argentina, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Argentine history. If you would like to participate, you can improve Che Guevara, or sign up and contribute to a wider array of articles like those on our to do list.ArgentinaWikipedia:WikiProject ArgentinaTemplate:WikiProject ArgentinaArgentine
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconCuba Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Cuba, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cuba related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CubaWikipedia:WikiProject CubaTemplate:WikiProject CubaCuba
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Cuba task list:

Task list

WikiProject iconCaribbean High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Caribbean, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to the countries of the Caribbean on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Misplaced Pages visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.CaribbeanWikipedia:WikiProject CaribbeanTemplate:WikiProject CaribbeanCaribbean
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconBasque
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Basque, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Basque Country, Basque people, Basque language, history and culture on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BasqueWikipedia:WikiProject BasqueTemplate:WikiProject BasqueBasque
???This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
WikiProject iconPolitics Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconAtheism Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Atheism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of atheism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AtheismWikipedia:WikiProject AtheismTemplate:WikiProject AtheismAtheism
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
For more information and how you can help, click the link opposite:

If you would like to participate, you can edit this article and visit the project page.

Quick help

Recent activity

To do

Join WikiProject atheism and be bold.

Be consistent

  • Use a "standard" layout for atheism-related articles (see layout style, "The perfect article" and Featured articles).
  • Add Atheism info box to all atheism related talk pages (use {{WikiProject Atheism}} or see info box)
  • Ensure atheism-related articles are members of Atheism by checking whether ] has been added to atheism-related articles – and, where it hasn't, adding it.

Maintenance, etc.

Articles to improve

Create

  • Articles on notable atheists


Expand

Immediate attention

  • State atheism needs a reassessment of its Importance level, as it has little to do with atheism and is instead an article about anti-theist/anti-religious actions of governments.
  • False choice into False dilemma: discuss whether you are for or against this merge here
  • Clarify references in Atheism using footnotes.
  • Secular movement defines it as a being restricted to America in the 21st century.
WikiProject iconBolivia Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Bolivia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of all Bolivia-related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BoliviaWikipedia:WikiProject BoliviaTemplate:WikiProject BoliviaBolivia
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Note icon
This article is featured on the Bolivia Portal selected article section.
WikiProject iconHistory
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Che Guevara. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Che Guevara at the Reference desk.
Former featured articleChe Guevara is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Good articleChe Guevara has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 18, 2006.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 3, 2004Featured article candidateNot promoted
September 3, 2004Featured article candidateNot promoted
December 16, 2005Peer reviewReviewed
December 19, 2005Good article nomineeListed
March 10, 2006Featured article candidatePromoted
April 23, 2008Featured article reviewDemoted
August 28, 2009Good article nomineeListed
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on October 8, 2004, October 8, 2005, October 8, 2006, October 7, 2009, October 7, 2010, October 8, 2011, October 8, 2013, October 8, 2017, October 8, 2019, and October 8, 2022.
Current status: Former featured article, current good article

Views in Argentina

I travelled extensively in Argentina and the views on Guevara were unanimous; he is rarely mentioned there and is certainly not a source of pride. Many I met described him as a "psychopath" who enjoyed killing people. He apparently told his father that he "enjoyed the smell of cordite and blood" after he had shot someone through the head. Not sure if this is worth extra exploration. 86.153.86.158 (talk) 17:03, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

It definitely isn't, I for one know plenty of Argentinians that are in awe of Guevara. Hearsay is not worth being mentioned on Misplaced Pages. 2A02:1811:C1F:8200:3564:4278:E78B:F860 (talk) 12:45, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Che was a psychopath who enjoyed killing people. He was also a homophobic and racist who hated black people. This is not hearsay. He publicly executed innocent Cubans by gunshot in front of many witnesses as a warning to anyone who tried to oppose their new government. Hectorgavilla (talk) 11:55, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Striking out material from block evader. Grandpallama (talk) 00:23, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

@Grandpallama: Although I agree that the heresay is irrelevant to our article, I looked at the IP and saw no evidence of block evasion. Is there a link that shows it? If so, it would be helpful if that is mentioned on the IP's talk page in case that editor continues making edits. --David Tornheim (talk) 00:39, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
David Tornheim, the editor is unlikely to show up with this particular IP again, as it's not static. That said, it's been pointed out to me that the age of the edit is such that I'm probably causing confusion more than helping (which makes sense); I only noticed today that he'd become active again for a while last year and was clearly overzealous in wanting to scrub his unproductive contributions. I've reverted my strikethrough. Grandpallama (talk) 06:25, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Okay. --David Tornheim (talk) 06:28, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Che was a mass murderer

Please add that Che Guevara was a mass murderer in the first sentence of this article. He should be put in the same category as Hitler. the sentence should read as follows:

was an Argentine Marxist Mass Murderer, physician, author, guerrilla leader, diplomat, and military theorist. Hectorgavilla (talk) 04:00, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

When was he convicted of being a mass murderer? HiLo48 (talk) 05:39, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
in Cuba he lined up innocent people against a wall “pared” and executed them without a trial for the public to witness. My Cuban family witnessed these executions and knew people who disappeared. He forced at gunpoint the removal of families from their homes. The only way to enforce socialism is to take away everything the people own by execution and physical violence. No one will willingly give the government their possessions. What I stated are facts. Hectorgavilla (talk) 11:51, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
Then it shouldn't be hard for you to provide some reliable sources here. Facts aren't hard to find in reliable sources. StephenMacky1 (talk) 12:48, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
Lots of sources exist, but they're very easy for you to ignore. 73.100.184.209 (talk) 01:23, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
If you have sources, WP:PROVEIT. Flounder fillet (talk) 00:46, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Alvaro Vargas LLosa, The Killing Machine; Che Guevara, from Communist Firebrand to Capitalist Brand" (Independent Insitiute:July 11, 2005, https://www.independent.org/news/article.asp?id=1535)
Guillermina Stutter Schneider. Che Was a Racist, Homophobe, and Mass Murderer (Human Progress: December 15, 2017, https://humanprogress.org/the-truth-about-che-guevara-racist-homophobe-and-mass-murderer/)
Troy J. Sacquety, Che Guevara: A False Idol for Revolutionaries (U.S Army Special Forces Command History Office: 2008, https://arsof-history.org/articles/v4n4_false_idol_page_1.html#fn:2)
These three sources support the idea that Che was ruthless, brutal, and guilty of more than enough human rights violations to earn multiple in-depth paragraphs for this article.
Aldrich.Faithful (talk) 03:30, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Semantic Error

Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please change "Cause of death Execution by shooting" to "Cause of death Elimination by shooting"

Che Guevara's capture and immediate execution without a legal trial would be more accurately described as an extrajudicial killing which is considered a form of murder. This differs from a lawful execution which typically involves a formal trial. Thirdfemalelead (talk) 05:31, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

 Done I replaced it with extrajudicial killing (per what's covered in the article's body). M.Bitton (talk) 15:17, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Can you also take care of the "Battles/wars" section, where he was labeled to be executed after a conviction. LackOfInspiration1 (talk) 10:21, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Interview with Tucker Carlson - Ex-CIA Agent Felix Rodriguez on Che Guevara death

Ex-CIA Agent on Capturing Che Guevara, Who Truly Killed JFK, and Election Predictions

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwohQJrJeo8&ab_channel=TuckerCarlson

Che Guevara was executed in 1967 in a remote Bolivian village. One of the last people to speak to him alive was CIA officer Felix Rodriguez (former CIA agent). Here’s his story.

Felix Rodriguez worked for the CIA until 1976.

Ironcurtain2 (talk) 16:38, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

That's not a reliable source. Simonm223 (talk) 16:57, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
It is his own testimony!!! Ironcurtain2 (talk) 16:58, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
That's not how WP:ABOUTSELF works. Simonm223 (talk) 16:59, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Edit conflict, "please provide the acronym that supports your logic". LOL. Ironcurtain2 (talk) 17:01, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Specifically see points 1 and 2:
1. The material is neither unduly self-serving nor an exceptional claim 2. It does not involve claims about third parties; Simonm223 (talk) 17:01, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Wow, you know how to make pretty colored text. I am impressed. LOL. Thanks for making my day, User:Simonm223 LOL. Ironcurtain2 (talk) 17:02, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
South Park
Officer Barbrady - There's nothing to see here.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LW6RWSiR88s&ab_channel=MiamiBadBoyBOSS

Ironcurtain2 (talk) 18:37, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Lies & propaganda surrounding Che.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/che-guevara-executing-women/

Example number 1: The link listed above where the accusation of him “Killing 2 woman” came out including him being accused of being a mass murderer (which is false, the people executed weren't innocent and were those working with Batista, war criminals etc.

Example number 2: The accusation that he was responsible for the UMAP camps/Imprisonment of homosexuals. in 1965 Che resigned his position as minister of industries and went to the Congo. He wasn't in Cuba during the operations of the camps and nor was he involved, Castro later took accountability for these camps stating how he failed the LGBT community in Cuba. Sproogli (talk) 16:40, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

Categories: