| Revision as of 07:18, 2 November 2018 editCAPTAIN RAJU (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers409,679 edits Updating nomination page with notices (assisted)← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 02:28, 7 February 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| ⚫ | ===]=== | ||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' | |||
| {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|U}} | |||
| <!--Template:Afd top | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result was '''redirect''' to ]. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 14:09, 10 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | ===]=== | ||
| <noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude> | <noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude> | ||
| :{{la|Hàn-jī}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks"></span>) | :{{la|Hàn-jī}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks"></span>) | ||
| :({{Find sources AFD|Hàn-jī}}) | :({{Find sources AFD|Hàn-jī}}) | ||
| Not actually a distinct writing system, it's just Chinese characters (with some unique ones, but it's still not as distinct as, say, Chu Nom. Not notable, google search returned nothing, couldn't find an indication of topic's notability from a brief search of scholarly database. ] < |
Not actually a distinct writing system, it's just Chinese characters (with some unique ones, but it's still not as distinct as, say, Chu Nom. Not notable, google search returned nothing, couldn't find an indication of topic's notability from a brief search of scholarly database. ] <span style="color:yellow;">Δ</span>] 04:52, 2 November 2018 (UTC) | ||
| :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ]. ]<sup>]</sup> 07:18, 2 November 2018 (UTC)</small> | :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ]. ]<sup>]</sup> 07:18, 2 November 2018 (UTC)</small> | ||
| * '''redirect''' to ] which covers the use of Chinese for Hokkien much more fully with sources.--<small>]</small><sup>]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-2.0ex;">]</sub> 13:04, 3 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ** Sounds reasonable, but I'm not sure if it would be better to redirect there, or maybe redirect to ], seeing as that's what Han-ji means. Should the Hokkien for Chinese characters redirect to Hokkien writing, or Chinese characters? I'm not sure we need it at all. --] <span style="color:yellow;">Δ</span>] 22:06, 3 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ***I see where you are coming from on this. I agree, Hàn-jī just means Chinese characters. But it’s a far less likely search term than e.g. ], so there is much less need for it. But as an article that’s existed a couple of years there may be links to it from elsewhere, it may be cached in e.g. search engines or browser caches. Anyone accessing it is likely looking for the content that’s there now, and the best place to send them is the article that covers the topic properly, which is ].--<small>]</small><sup>]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-2.0ex;">]</sub> 11:29, 4 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
| {{clear}} | |||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | |||
Latest revision as of 02:28, 7 February 2023
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Written Hokkien. Sandstein 14:09, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Hàn-jī
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- Hàn-jī (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not actually a distinct writing system, it's just Chinese characters (with some unique ones, but it's still not as distinct as, say, Chu Nom. Not notable, google search returned nothing, couldn't find an indication of topic's notability from a brief search of scholarly database. Yellow Diamond Δ Direct Line to the Diamonds 04:52, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 07:18, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
- redirect to Written Hokkien which covers the use of Chinese for Hokkien much more fully with sources.--JohnBlackburnedeeds 13:04, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- Sounds reasonable, but I'm not sure if it would be better to redirect there, or maybe redirect to Chinese characters, seeing as that's what Han-ji means. Should the Hokkien for Chinese characters redirect to Hokkien writing, or Chinese characters? I'm not sure we need it at all. --Yellow Diamond Δ Direct Line to the Diamonds 22:06, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- I see where you are coming from on this. I agree, Hàn-jī just means Chinese characters. But it’s a far less likely search term than e.g. Hanzi, so there is much less need for it. But as an article that’s existed a couple of years there may be links to it from elsewhere, it may be cached in e.g. search engines or browser caches. Anyone accessing it is likely looking for the content that’s there now, and the best place to send them is the article that covers the topic properly, which is Written Hokkien.--JohnBlackburnedeeds 11:29, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
- Sounds reasonable, but I'm not sure if it would be better to redirect there, or maybe redirect to Chinese characters, seeing as that's what Han-ji means. Should the Hokkien for Chinese characters redirect to Hokkien writing, or Chinese characters? I'm not sure we need it at all. --Yellow Diamond Δ Direct Line to the Diamonds 22:06, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.