| Revision as of 14:23, 9 November 2006 editHanuman Das (talk | contribs)5,424 edits →List of articles repeatedly disrupted by Mattisse and her sockpuppets for investigation← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 11:55, 17 March 2023 edit undoLegobot (talk | contribs)Bots1,667,389 editsm Bot: Fixing lint errors, replacing obsolete HTML tags: <font> (5x)Tag: Fixed lint errors | ||
| (177 intermediate revisions by 29 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==Welcome & Disclaimer (please read)== | |||
| == lost virginity == | |||
| This is the talk page for ]. Please to the '''bottom''' of the page. Please note that I reserve the right to blank messages on this page for any reason, but most especially will certainly do so for any ] or for communication with a third party on my talk page. If you have something to say to someone, use their talk page, not mine. If you do not agree with this policy, please don't post on this page, but rather contact me on the talk page of the article involved. Thank you. —] 13:59, 5 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Congratulations on your first userpage vandalism! ] 00:25, 17 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Archives== | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| Also here are your current ] awards, if you want them: | |||
| == ] == | |||
| <!--]''', and is entitled to display this '''Yeoman Editor Badge''']]--> | |||
| <!--]''', and is entitled to display this '''Misplaced Pages Vest Pocket Book''']]--> | |||
| *Wow, you've . At this rate you'll be Tutnun in a few months. ] 00:32, 17 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] pages - help! == | |||
| {{halt|Please stop. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people{{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}| as you did at ]}}, you will be ] for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Thank you. <!-- Template:Npa3 -->}} | |||
| Please do not make personal attacks as you did in the edit summary for --] <font color = "blue"><sup>]</sup></font> 15:12, 3 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| You are not using the article discussion page when you change pages in a manner as you just did with ]. When you do this without engaging other editors interested in the article you are missing the opportunity to explain, education and discuss. You did not engage in the ] and so that opportunity to discuss and understand was missed. How are we going to resolve this? The whole thing is going to start up again if we don't behave more kindly to one another, even if we don't agree. ]] 15:05, 28 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Kriya Yoga == | |||
| :Greetings, Hanuman Das. In the interests of full disclosure, I want to draw your attention to my recent comments on the ] of the Starwood ]. I have seen and respected your work in the past, but I'm troubled by one particular edit of yours. | |||
| Hi Hanuman Das, There's another Kriya Yoga teacher, in a very similar vein to Gurunath Siddhanath, that is wanting his two cents on the ] page. If you have any suggestions, based on past experience, please feel free to comment. There does need to be some sort of solution. I offer a suggestion, but would like some feedback on it. See ]. Also, your revert of my edit of the book link on the Babaji page was probably correct, since it only referred to the book (as opposed to quoting or talking about a specific reference from the book). Thanks, ] 03:01, 7 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Similarly, I've had concerns about ] in the past, but in this case it's starting to look like zie may be in the right, at least partially. | |||
| :Please jump into the discussion; it'll put you in a better position to defend your edits against charges of linkspamming. | |||
| :] 15:42, 30 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == |
==]== | ||
| I think there are some things really wrong with the Neem Karoli Baba page here. -- Abhinav | |||
| :Could you be a bit more specific? Clearly it could use expansion, but I don't ''think'' there is anything terribly "wrong" with it at the moment. —] 19:06, 28 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| . Please stop. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people{{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}| as you did at ]}}, you will be ] for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Thank you. <!-- Template:Npa3 --> ] 06:09, 9 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :It's probably in your best interest to bring your concerns to ] for review, then. Just to make sure you get a fair hearing, I'd recommend staying away from that sort of post in the future, since people will surely take notice of it. I do get the impression there's something more going on, here, so I'd like these concerns to be heard, even if posts like that are quite inappropriate. AN/I is probably your spot. ] 06:16, 9 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Thank you! == | |||
| This has been going on since <strike>September</strike> August. It's been brought up on AN/I. Where can one get an advocate? I'd like somebody else to investigate Mattisse. I'd like to know why after using to carry on harassment of pagan articles, this user is allowed to keep doing so. —] 06:20, 9 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| You always seem a cut above the other endorsers, and it seemed like we could be friends for a while there. Yes, it does give me ulcers and untold distress. But (I disclose to you alone) I am a UC at Berkeley graduate and the standing up for principle stuff I can't seem to let go of that. I believe that Rosencomet and 999 are deeply in the wrong and misinformed. So what are my choices, given my background? It's a failing of mine but there it is. I truly am not antipagan (even if I don't know what that is) but, for heaven's sakes, I listen to Art Bell et al every night -- which seems to me beyond pagamism. A few nights ago I learned that the new Canadian Prime Minister's greatest fear is that the US will get into a war with extra-terrestials. (Even Art Bell seemed nonplussed about that.) Oh, be my friend. I can't negotiate all alone through this Misplaced Pages world. Could we agree to disagree on some things and still like and enjoy each other? Sincerely, ]] 04:37, 30 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ]You have been temporarily blocked from editing for disrupting Misplaced Pages by making ]. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. <!-- Template:Npa5 --> | |||
| == Illuminates == | |||
| :Sorry, but you need to cool down.--''']''' 06:21, 9 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| "Self-published" means here that the only source of info is the illuminates themselves, without independent third-party evaluation. Since this bullshit is mosty harmless, I will not lose my sleep over it. Good luck to defend them. I will not interfere any more. `'] 01:22, 2 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::Please investigate ] who has been intentionally disruptive since <strike>September</strike> August attacking the articles of pagan authors and musicians, using multiple sockpuppets in the process. —] 06:24, 9 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Starwood == | |||
| :When your block has expired you may wish to participate in ] which will hopefully resolve this in a more civil manner. --] (]) 09:35, 9 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Pigman has asked a question of you on the Starwood mediation page... Thought you'd want to know... ] (]) 17:21, 3 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==List of articles repeatedly disrupted by Mattisse and her sockpuppets for investigation== | |||
| == re: Your comment to me == | |||
| *{{article|Anodea Judith}} - using ] and ] (also ''']''') | |||
| *{{article|Badal Roy}} - using ] (also ''']''') | |||
| *{{article|Christopher Moore}} - using ] (also ''']''') | |||
| *{{article|Church of the SubGenius}} - using ], ], and ] | |||
| *{{article|Dattatreya}} - using ] and ] | |||
| *{{article|David Jay Brown}} - using ], ], and ] (also ''']''') | |||
| *{{article|Deborah Lipp}} - using ] and ] (also ''']''') | |||
| *{{article|Diana L. Paxson}} - using ] and ] (also ''']''') | |||
| *{{article|Donald Michael Kraig}} - using ] (also ''']''') | |||
| *{{article|Gavin Frost}} - using ] and ] (also ''']''') | |||
| *{{article|Gilli Smyth}} - using ] (also ''']''') | |||
| *{{article|Halim El-Dabh}} - using ] and ] (also ''']''') | |||
| *{{article|Harvey Wasserman}} - using ] and ] (also ''']''') | |||
| *{{article|Ina May Gaskin}} - using ], and ] (also ''']''') | |||
| *{{article|Isaac Bonewits}} - using ], ], and ] (also ''']''') | |||
| *{{article|Ivan Stang}} - using ] (also ''']''') | |||
| *{{article|Jay Stevens}} - using ] and ] (also ''']''') | |||
| *{{article|Jeff Rosenbaum}} - using ] and ] (also ''']''') | |||
| *{{article|Jesse Wolf Hardin}} - using ] (also ''']''') | |||
| *{{article|Louis Martinie'}} - using ] and ] (also ''']''') | |||
| *{{article|M. Macha Nightmare}} - using ] and ] (also ''']''') | |||
| *{{article|Matthew Abelson}} - using ] (also ''']''') | |||
| *{{article|Miriam Chamani]}} - using ] (also ''']''') | |||
| *{{article|Morning Glory Zell-Ravenheart}} - using ] and ] (also ''']''') | |||
| *{{article|Muruga Booker}} - using ], ], and ] (also ''']''') | |||
| *{{article|Nema}} - using ] and ] (also ''']''') | |||
| *{{article|Oberon Zell Ravenheart}} - using ], ], and ] | |||
| *{{article|Patricia Monaghan}} - using ] (also ''']''') | |||
| *{{article|Philip H. Farber}} - using ] (also ''']''') | |||
| *{{article|Ralph Metzner}} - using ] and ] (also ''']''') | |||
| *{{article|Raymond Buckland}} - using ] (also ''']''') | |||
| *{{article|Robert Shea}} - using ], ], ], and ] | |||
| *{{article|Sally Eaton}} - using ] (also ''']''') | |||
| *{{article|Selena Fox}} - using ] and ] | |||
| *{{article|Stanley Krippner}} - using ] and ] (also ''']''') | |||
| *{{article|Starwood Festival}} - using ], ], ], ], ], ], and ] (also ''']''') | |||
| *{{article|Stephen Gaskin}} - using ] and ] (also ''']''') | |||
| *{{article|Stewart Farrar}} - using ] and ] (also ''']''') | |||
| *{{article|Trance Mission}} - using ] (also ''']''') | |||
| *{{article|Victoria Ganger}} - using ] and ] (also ''']''') | |||
| *{{article|WinterStar Symposium}} - using ], ], and ] (also ''']''') | |||
| *{{article|Yaya Diallo}} - using ] and ] (also ''']''') | |||
| *{{article|Yvonne Frost}} - using ] and ] (also ''']''') | |||
| I don't think that part of the mediation is really being addressed, but that is up to Salix Alba to decide. I think his intention was to address ALL of the linking, including internal linking, and thus far I believe only some external links to the web site have been removed. Either way, I am advising Pigman to open the RfC to get the larger community involved. --<span style="color: #3300FF;">] </span> 04:08, 4 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Please note that almost all of these have ''also'' been more recently harassed by ]. What are the chances of that? —] 07:33, 9 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == |
== Recent edits == | ||
| Is there a reason for your flurry of recent edits like ? There is a place to seek remedies for sockpuppetry, and article talk pages are not it. Adding unsigned taglines to someone's else's contributions, socks or not, is just disruptive and incivil. --<span style="color: #3300FF;">] </span> 15:39, 4 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Hi Adityanath. I do admit to being a little green behind the ears here. I feel like I have a decent grasp of the core concepts tho, having read the core policies and standards--altho I could benefit from reading them over a few more times or from getting pointers from more experienced wikipedians such as yourself. The goal is verifiability, not truth--which was why I made the edits that I did, because I felt that the deleted texts didn't cite reliable sources that supported their claims, which is what I understand the verifiability policy to be. And, as an aside, the edits weren't anything close to vandalism--I hope they didn't come across that way. I'm going to put something up on the talk page tomorrow so we can hopefully come to agreement. --] 08:12, 9 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == May we discuss an issue == | |||
| Hi Hanuman Das. There are some issues that I would like to discuss with you regarding some of your recent edits. Are you amenable to a discussion? --] <span style="color: blue;"><sup>]</sup></span> 23:42, 4 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Basically I used ]. | |||
| Which is just to say it was my own personal assessment. | |||
| Personally, I think it is really close to an A and probably is, and I wish I could be more specific but can't think of any specific suggestions (right now) | |||
| ] 02:03, 5 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==] case== | |||
| It was a JOKE, get it? Or do I have to Wikilink it, ]. No policy violations were committed, there was no "abuse, libel, or ban evasion." Stop harassing me. —] 20:29, 5 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::You seem to have notions about how Misplaced Pages works, and about Misplaced Pages policies that do not correspond to my own beliefs. My suggestion to you is to either a) wait things out, or b) acknowledge that you threatened to use sockpuppets in a disruptive way and state for the record that you will not use sockpuppets. Of course there is always option c) which is to ignore the advice that is given to you. Sincerely, --] <span style="color: blue;"><sup>]</sup></span> 20:24, 5 December 2006 (UTC) Also, removing discussions that I am having with you while you are attempting to resolve your sockpuppetry case do not help your cause. --] <span style="color: blue;"><sup>]</sup></span> 20:37, 5 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::I have no cause, and I am no longer interested in communication with you. You have no sense of humor. Please don't post on my talk page again. Thanks. —] 20:43, 5 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 11:55, 17 March 2023
lost virginity
Congratulations on your first userpage vandalism! Herostratus 00:25, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Also here are your current WP:SERVICE awards, if you want them:
- Wow, you've gotten busy. At this rate you'll be Tutnun in a few months. Herostratus 00:32, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Starwood Festival pages - help!
You are not using the article discussion page when you change pages in a manner as you just did with Andrew Cohen. When you do this without engaging other editors interested in the article you are missing the opportunity to explain, education and discuss. You did not engage in the Misplaced Pages:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-11-03 Starwood Festival and so that opportunity to discuss and understand was missed. How are we going to resolve this? The whole thing is going to start up again if we don't behave more kindly to one another, even if we don't agree. Mattisse(talk) 15:05, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
- Greetings, Hanuman Das. In the interests of full disclosure, I want to draw your attention to my recent comments on the talk page of the Starwood discussion. I have seen and respected your work in the past, but I'm troubled by one particular edit of yours.
- Similarly, I've had concerns about Mattisse in the past, but in this case it's starting to look like zie may be in the right, at least partially.
- Please jump into the discussion; it'll put you in a better position to defend your edits against charges of linkspamming.
- Septegram 15:42, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
Neem Karoli Baba
I think there are some things really wrong with the Neem Karoli Baba page here. -- Abhinav
- Could you be a bit more specific? Clearly it could use expansion, but I don't think there is anything terribly "wrong" with it at the moment. —Hanuman Das 19:06, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Thank you!
You always seem a cut above the other endorsers, and it seemed like we could be friends for a while there. Yes, it does give me ulcers and untold distress. But (I disclose to you alone) I am a UC at Berkeley graduate and the standing up for principle stuff I can't seem to let go of that. I believe that Rosencomet and 999 are deeply in the wrong and misinformed. So what are my choices, given my background? It's a failing of mine but there it is. I truly am not antipagan (even if I don't know what that is) but, for heaven's sakes, I listen to Art Bell et al every night -- which seems to me beyond pagamism. A few nights ago I learned that the new Canadian Prime Minister's greatest fear is that the US will get into a war with extra-terrestials. (Even Art Bell seemed nonplussed about that.) Oh, be my friend. I can't negotiate all alone through this Misplaced Pages world. Could we agree to disagree on some things and still like and enjoy each other? Sincerely, Mattisse(talk) 04:37, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
Illuminates
"Self-published" means here that the only source of info is the illuminates themselves, without independent third-party evaluation. Since this bullshit is mosty harmless, I will not lose my sleep over it. Good luck to defend them. I will not interfere any more. `'mikkanarxi 01:22, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
Starwood
Pigman has asked a question of you on the Starwood mediation page... Thought you'd want to know... Ekajati (yakity-yak) 17:21, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
re: Your comment to me
I don't think that part of the mediation is really being addressed, but that is up to Salix Alba to decide. I think his intention was to address ALL of the linking, including internal linking, and thus far I believe only some external links to the web site have been removed. Either way, I am advising Pigman to open the RfC to get the larger community involved. --Ars Scriptor 04:08, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Recent edits
Is there a reason for your flurry of recent edits like this? There is a place to seek remedies for sockpuppetry, and article talk pages are not it. Adding unsigned taglines to someone's else's contributions, socks or not, is just disruptive and incivil. --Ars Scriptor 15:39, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
May we discuss an issue
Hi Hanuman Das. There are some issues that I would like to discuss with you regarding some of your recent edits. Are you amenable to a discussion? --BostonMA 23:42, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Nath
Basically I used Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Hinduism/Assessment#Quality_scale.
Which is just to say it was my own personal assessment.
Personally, I think it is really close to an A and probably is, and I wish I could be more specific but can't think of any specific suggestions (right now)
TheRingess 02:03, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
It was a JOKE, get it? Or do I have to Wikilink it, joke. No policy violations were committed, there was no "abuse, libel, or ban evasion." Stop harassing me. —Hanuman Das 20:29, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- You seem to have notions about how Misplaced Pages works, and about Misplaced Pages policies that do not correspond to my own beliefs. My suggestion to you is to either a) wait things out, or b) acknowledge that you threatened to use sockpuppets in a disruptive way and state for the record that you will not use sockpuppets. Of course there is always option c) which is to ignore the advice that is given to you. Sincerely, --BostonMA 20:24, 5 December 2006 (UTC) Also, removing discussions that I am having with you while you are attempting to resolve your sockpuppetry case do not help your cause. --BostonMA 20:37, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- I have no cause, and I am no longer interested in communication with you. You have no sense of humor. Please don't post on my talk page again. Thanks. —Hanuman Das 20:43, 5 December 2006 (UTC)