Misplaced Pages

:Requests for comment/Society, law, and sex: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:02, 10 November 2006 editMugaliens (talk | contribs)848 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 15:00, 21 October 2009 edit undoXqbot (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,323,590 editsm Robot: Fixing double redirect to Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Society, sports, and culture 
(339 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
#REDIRECT ]
{{shortcut|]}}
{{RFCheader|Society, law, and sex}}
<!--<nowiki>Add new items at the TOP. Use ~~~~~ (five tildes) to sign </nowiki>-->
*] - Valid content present for approximately one year was recently removed by an individual, ], apparently an admin. Earlier this summer there was a violent dispute between him and other members involving what is best characterized as an overzealous desire to promote a single fashion ideal for men and delete all content and references beyond one standard deviation from the men along the fashion normal distribution curve. He supports his actions by labeling the content as "spam" when it's clearly not spam (no commercial gain whatsoever). Additional comments can be found at the page. 17:02, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
*]. The advert tag seems grossly unjustified in the present state. In addition, personal opinions (editorializing) are being added to sections.11:44, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
*] - After a brief consensual stabilization (just reverted to it), the article is again under attack by people with a racist/White nationalist agenda that want to make it their political billboard, editing at will without accepting discussion or consensus. Many issues that should be in the corresponding parent article (]) or subarticles (], for instance) are continuously added to this one against majority opinion. See article history for details. 09:05, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
* ] - Repeated reverts of the article due to POV edits and links to unreliable websites as citations for the POV edits. -- 00:05, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
*] - Votes and commentary requested for whether the article ] should be renamed (i.e. to "joint" or "cigarette (cannabis)"). 09:14, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
*] How is ] defined? &mdash; 22:55, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
*]: This is a controversy about whether a group of gay nuns called the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence belongs on this page. --] 01:07, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
*]. Are specific claims made in the article "exceptional" per ]? Is it acceptable to link to Southern Poverty Law Center as the only source in each instance? 19:39, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
*]: proposing to add, in the "See Also" section, a link to ]. This supersedes the request below. 18:31, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
*]: Should ''all'' sourced information be included, even when it comes from extremist self-published partisan sources, or should the article be written with reference to non-partisan academic sources and scientific studies? 11:19, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
*]: Repeated deletions of any material alluding to exclusion of non-theists from Boy Scouts. 23:52, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
*] - whether the University is the oldest university in the Philippines. 09:14, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
*] - Whether a drawn, black-and-white image depicting three people engaging in a sex act is an appropriate image for the article. 13:38, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
*] - What Misplaced Pages guidelines or customs govern the "notability" threshold for items within an article? Is a "war" between two dormitories, which was covered in a long article in a campus newspaper, suitable for inclusion in an article whose topic is one of those dormitories? 23:40, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
*] Does this article use irrelevant facts and unverified claims to subtly discredit this organization? Do the citations in this article support the claims they are intended to support? 23:57, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
*] does recently added subsection adhere to ] and ]? 19:32, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

<!--Add new items at the TOP, NOT HERE. Use ~~~~~ (five tildes) to sign-->

Latest revision as of 15:00, 21 October 2009

Redirect to: