| Revision as of 08:06, 2 December 2018 editAlex 21 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Template editors139,214 edits Reverted 1 edit by Hijiri88 (talk): "Please be careful about what you say to people." Yes, they can. Do not post on my talk page unless it is an actual discussion. (TW)Tag: Undo← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 09:17, 25 December 2024 edit undoKailash29792 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers353,237 edits →You season 5: new sectionTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit New topic | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{:User:Alex 21}}{{bots|deny=SineBot}} | |||
| {{DISPLAYTITLE:User talk:<span style="color:#16329F">'''Alex'''''The'''''Whovian'''</span>}} | |||
| ⚫ | {{float|]: {{querylink|User_talk:Alex 21|qs=action=info#mw-pageinfo-watchers|142}} }} | ||
| {{:User:AlexTheWhovian}} | |||
| {{User:Alex 21/Tabs|2}} {{^|Holiday|until=|bgcol=#5E93FD}} | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| {{Archives|start=2014|auto=long|search=yes|style=float:right}} | |||
| {{User:AlexTheWhovian/Tabs|2}} | |||
| {{float|{{Archives|auto=yes|search=yes}}{{User:AlexTheWhovian/Archive}}}} | |||
| {{Usertalkback|you=watched|me=notifications}} | {{Usertalkback|you=watched|me=notifications}} | ||
| __TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
| Line 12: | Line 11: | ||
| --> | --> | ||
| == ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == | |||
| == '']'' == | |||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| Hey AlexTheWhovian, | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| I was hoping you might do me a favor and take a look at the most recent edit over at the article '']''. Another editor has consistently attempted to remove an entire section of the article regarding accolades/awards that the series has received. The awarding organization "Got Your 6" has partnered with various entertainment companies such as 21st Century Fox, NBCUniversal, CBS, HBO, Viacom and Paramount Pictures, Sony Pictures Entertainment, Lionsgate, A+E Networks, Live Nation Entertainment, UTA, 44 Blue, The Ebersol Lanigan Company, DreamWorks Animation, Endemol Shine North America, and Valhalla Entertainment. The awarding event was reported on by ''Variety'' as seen here: https://variety.com/2017/tv/news/got-your-6-veterans-the-gifted-disjointed-1202607620/. The other editor has argued that the paragraph/section of the article should be removed and cited General Notability Guidelines and Undue Weight as an issue. I may be in the wrong here but I am of the belief that the information warrants mentioning in the article given the stature of the organization within the entertainment industry and the fact that the awards event was covered by a major publication (being ''Variety''). I don't know...maybe give the article and its edit history a look and let me know what you think. Worth noting that I've created an article for the organization here: ]. – ] (]) 05:41, 25 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
| :{{u|BoogerD}}, first off, I would recommend posting that paragraph on the talk page for the opposing editor. -- ''']''''']'' 06:54, 25 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:32, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> | |||
| == American Horror Story dates == | |||
| </div> | |||
| In the episode articles for '']'', editors have assumed that because part of the season takes place in October 2021 (evidenced by a character saying that an email sent on October 20, 2021 was sent {{tq|a week ago}} and the next episode was set on Halloween no more than a few days later), an earlier event (a nuclear missile hit LA starting the titled Apocalypse) must have taken place in early 2020 as the the show says the 2021 events took place 18 months after the bomb hit. They also assume that flashbacks must have taken place in 2017 as these events are described by the show as being {{tq|three years before the bomb}}. What I'm asking is if these assumptions are OR or not? As I believe you don't watch the show, I hope I've explained the situation clearly enough. ]] 14:20, 25 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
| </div> | |||
| :{{u|TedEdwards}}, I don't, I only edit the articles to keep my partner up to date, as she watches it. If you have to put "assume" in your sentence, then it's textbook OR. To include content about the nuclear missile occurring in 2020, a source needs to explicitly state this. Same for the flashbacks. Cheers. -- ''']''''']'' 23:22, 25 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/05&oldid=1258243594 --> | |||
| ==Disputed non-free use rationale for File:The Adventures of Puss in Boots.jpg== | |||
| ] | |||
| Thank you for uploading ''']'''. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Misplaced Pages may not meet the criteria required by ]. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from ] is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an ]; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale. | |||
| If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with ]. If you have any questions, please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-disputed fair use rationale-notice --> — Ирука<sup>]</sup> 11:47, 4 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Slander against you == | |||
| ⚫ | ==] has been nominated for deletion== | ||
| There was an edit by an anon reverted by another anon on ] very recently which basically said something horrid about you by name. That anon needs serious blocking and investigating to see if it's someone we know hiding behind the address. Unlikely they'd be that stupid but you never know. Good hunting. ] (]) 20:27, 26 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
| :{{u|ZarhanFastfire}}, thanks for the heads up. I've had a bit of that recently and I think it's the same editor; take a look at the history of my talk page and the three edits I reverted by the two redlinked-users. To be honest, I'm not overly worried about it; giving them attention is what they want, so I just revert and go on my merry way. All the best! -- ''']''''']'' 01:59, 27 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ::It's now persistent and by multiple IPs. We need protection. I assume you can do this? ] (]) 07:56, 27 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
| :::{{u|ZarhanFastfire}}, not myself, but I've requested page protection. Cheers. -- ''']''''']'' 07:59, 27 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Good because I need to go to bed. ] (]) 08:01, 27 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>] has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 14:14, 11 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
| ⚫ | == |
||
| ⚫ | == ST5 Episode Titles == | ||
| Sorry I missed that I was reverting the edit summary and thanks for catching that. I thought I was reverting only the reference to Ken Kirby, which I could not find a reference for as an actor or character in the series. A stunt person is listed as portraying the character(?) in the IMDB which is rather curious so I am may have missed something there too. ] (]) 02:35, 28 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
| :{{u|Donner60}}, no problems. If that remains unsourced, then sure, you can remove it. I thought I was reverting only the summary-revery, my bad. -- ''']''''']'' 03:05, 29 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ::I meant the plot summary; I think you realized that. I should stay away from that article! I seem to stumble over every time I touch it or write about it! Thanks again. ] (]) 03:38, 29 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | ==] has been nominated for |
||
| I just wanted to ask why you are so insistent that you won't allow anyone to put "Chapter #'s" in front of the remaining episodes. Doesn't the fact that episode 1 of season 5 and the entire previous 4 season's episodes all have that prefix kind of make your point invalid?? I get there isn't an official "source" that "supports" it, but they will 100% have that prefix. I don't know why you keep changing it. The fact that you keep REMOVING the chapter numbers, just makes the titles even MORE inaccurate. ] (]) 02:46, 18 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div> |
||
| :Do you have a source for that? "But last season did it!" ain't a source, it's ]. {{tq|I get there isn't an official "source" that "supports" it}}, oh good, you get it. Then why are we discussing this? -- ]<sub> ]</sub> 02:48, 18 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Trivial == | |||
| == DW WikiProject == | |||
| Is it still not enough to stay on the page? ] (]) 23:28, 29 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
| :{{u|Sebastian James}}, see the article. -- ''']''''']'' 23:28, 29 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ::Pardon me, you are too fast or I am too slow. ] (]) 23:30, 29 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
| I'm not going to deny the fact we've had more than a few disagreements while I've been here. We have however, always been able to move past them (I think I even had to write you apologies once or twice) and continue to collaborate. I also respect you a lot as an editor and appreciate all the work that you've put into project-related articles over the years (both on the back and front end). That said, I'm extremely sorry to see that you have removed yourself as a contributor of the project. Even if it's down the road, I hope that you might eventually see a way forward and continue to contribute. If not, I'll hate to see you go and just wanted to let you know that your effort hasn't gone unnoticed or unappreciated. {{smiley}} ] ] 04:28, 19 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | == |
||
| I too just saw that you removed your name from the list of active participants, and concur with everything TheDoctorWho has said- you and your contributions are very much appreciated. The phasing out of CultBox is not gonna change much for the WikiProject- we have also done the same for Doctor Who News- and we still have several GAs since. Almost, if not all of the info dependent on it can be sourced from other sources as well. ] (]) 14:35, 19 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Hi Alex, | |||
| == Merry Christmas == | |||
| I was wondering if you might take a look at a discussion (see here ]) that I've been pulled into in the last two days. An editor recently removed an episode table from an article I was working on citing a lack of sourcing. However, in the last year-and-a-half of serious editing I've been doing on here, I've been led to believe that such sourcing of titled, directors, writers, and airdates were unnecessary if the episodes of said series have already aired or been released. The two editors engaged in the discussion have stated that this is not the case so I am hoping if you, and potentially other in the WP:TV community might be able to help here. Thanks, ] (]) 04:04, 30 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
| {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 4px solid #FFD700;" | |||
| == Apologies == | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 2px;" | ] | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 2px 2px 0 2px; height: 1.5em;" | '''Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2025!''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | | |||
| ---- | |||
| '''Hello Alex 21, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this ]. Spread the ] by wishing another user a ] and a ], whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2025. <br />Happy editing,'''<br /> | |||
| <b>] ] ]</b> 19:51, 24 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ''{{resize|96%|Spread the love by adding {{tls|Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.}}'' | |||
| If it’s worth anything, I’d like to apologize for my conduct during our Dracula discussion. Regardless of whatever was bugging me at that moment it wasn’t something you deserved to have get put on you. You were absolutely right to move it back to draftspace. And it’ll remain there until filming can be sourced. Sorry again, and hopefully I can be civiler in any future discussions. ] 04:43, 30 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
| |} <b>] ] ]</b> 19:51, 24 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :{{u|Rusted AutoParts}}, no problems. Apologies for my accusations as well, they weren't in overly good faith. All the best. -- ''']''''']'' 04:51, 30 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | == ] == | ||
| Per , Charlotte Ritchie is in the main cast. It says, " will also star Charlotte Richie, Madeline Brewer, Anna Camp and Griffin Matthews". <span style="white-space:nowrap;font-family: Papyrus">] ] </span> 09:17, 25 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 09:17, 25 December 2024
TPS: 142 Home Talk Userboxes Scripts Sandbox 1 | DW | Module: / Sandbox TV Shows Notes Contributions Subpages Uploads
 Archives | |||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:The Adventures of Puss in Boots.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:The Adventures of Puss in Boots.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Misplaced Pages may not meet the criteria required by Misplaced Pages:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Misplaced Pages:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука 11:47, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
Category:Doctor Who concepts has been nominated for deletion
Category:Doctor Who concepts has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Jontesta (talk) 14:14, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
ST5 Episode Titles
I just wanted to ask why you are so insistent that you won't allow anyone to put "Chapter #'s" in front of the remaining episodes. Doesn't the fact that episode 1 of season 5 and the entire previous 4 season's episodes all have that prefix kind of make your point invalid?? I get there isn't an official "source" that "supports" it, but they will 100% have that prefix. I don't know why you keep changing it. The fact that you keep REMOVING the chapter numbers, just makes the titles even MORE inaccurate. 173.56.210.3 (talk) 02:46, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Do you have a source for that? "But last season did it!" ain't a source, it's WP:OR.
I get there isn't an official "source" that "supports" it
, oh good, you get it. Then why are we discussing this? -- Alex_21 TALK 02:48, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
DW WikiProject
I'm not going to deny the fact we've had more than a few disagreements while I've been here. We have however, always been able to move past them (I think I even had to write you apologies once or twice) and continue to collaborate. I also respect you a lot as an editor and appreciate all the work that you've put into project-related articles over the years (both on the back and front end). That said, I'm extremely sorry to see that you have removed yourself as a contributor of the project. Even if it's down the road, I hope that you might eventually see a way forward and continue to contribute. If not, I'll hate to see you go and just wanted to let you know that your effort hasn't gone unnoticed or unappreciated. 
TheDoctorWho (talk) 04:28, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
I too just saw that you removed your name from the list of active participants, and concur with everything TheDoctorWho has said- you and your contributions are very much appreciated. The phasing out of CultBox is not gonna change much for the WikiProject- we have also done the same for Doctor Who News- and we still have several GAs since. Almost, if not all of the info dependent on it can be sourced from other sources as well. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 14:35, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
Merry Christmas
|
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2025! |
|
Hello Alex 21, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2025. Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 19:51, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
You season 5
Per Deadline, Charlotte Ritchie is in the main cast. It says, " will also star Charlotte Richie, Madeline Brewer, Anna Camp and Griffin Matthews". Kailash29792 (talk) 09:17, 25 December 2024 (UTC)