| Revision as of 18:53, 24 January 2019 editLouisAragon (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers71,814 edits Warning: Three-revert rule. (TW)← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 22:53, 24 January 2019 edit undoMSGJ (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators130,796 edits You have been blocked from editing for violation of the three-revert rule on Safavid dynasty family tree. (TW) | ||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ⚫ | == January 2019 == | ||
| ] Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an ]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.{{Break}}''-''<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 18:53, 24 January 2019 (UTC) | |||
| == Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion == | |||
| ] | |||
| Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at ] regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on ]. The thread is ]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. ] (]) 18:58, 24 January 2019 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | == January 2019 == | ||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px">]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''24 hours''' for ] and violating the ], as you did at ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ].</div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the ], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. — Martin <small>(] · ])</small> 22:53, 24 January 2019 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-3block --> | |||
Latest revision as of 22:53, 24 January 2019
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. The thread is Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Pikermerle reported by User:LouisAragon (Result: ). Thank you. LouisAragon (talk) 18:58, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
January 2019
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 22:53, 24 January 2019 (UTC)