Misplaced Pages

Psychic: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:22, 25 January 2019 view source65.74.99.58 (talk) Removed obscure examples of psychics in fiction, replaced with more well-known ones.Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit← Previous edit Latest revision as of 13:57, 6 December 2024 view source Enervation (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,437 editsm Psychic fraudTags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit App section source 
(121 intermediate revisions by 80 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Person claiming extrasensory perception abilities}}
{{other uses}} {{Other uses}}
{{Paranormal|state=expanded|image=PsychicBoston.jpg|caption=Storefront psychic ] in ]}} {{Paranormal|state=expanded|image=PsychicBoston.jpg|caption=Storefront psychic ] in ]}}


A '''psychic''' is a person who claims to use ] (ESP) to identify information hidden from the normal ]s, particularly involving ] or ], or who performs acts that are apparently inexplicable by natural laws. Although many people believe in psychic abilities, the scientific consensus is that there is no proof of the existence of such powers, and describe the practice as ]. The word "psychic" is also used as an adjective to describe such abilities. In this meaning, this word has two synonyms, which are ''parapsychic'' and ''metapsychic''. A '''psychic''' is a person{{Efn|The word "psychic" is also used as an adjective to describe such abilities.}} who claims to use powers rooted in ], such as ] (ESP), to identify information hidden from the normal ]s, particularly involving ] or ]; or who performs acts that are apparently inexplicable by natural laws, such as ] or ]. Although many people believe in ], the scientific consensus is that there is no proof of the existence of such powers, and describes the practice as ].


Psychics encompass people in a variety of roles. Some are theatrical performers, such as ], who use various techniques, e.g., ], ], and ], to produce the appearance of such abilities for entertainment purposes. A large industry and network exists whereby people advertised as psychics provide advice and counsel to clients.<ref name="nisbet">{{Cite journal|author=Matthew Nisbet |date=May–June 1998 |title=Psychic telephone networks profit on yearning, gullibility |magazine=] |url=http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2843/is_/ai_20615402 }}{{dead link|date=May 2017 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> Some famous psychics include ], ], ], ],<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.hitn.tv/en/dialogo/050113_cambios_en_el_planeta_y_por_el_planeta/invitados |title=Archived copy |accessdate=2014-06-28 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20150402105414/http://www.hitn.tv/en/dialogo/050113_cambios_en_el_planeta_y_por_el_planeta/invitados |archivedate=2015-04-02 |df= }}</ref> ],<ref name="ftc">{{Cite web|title=FTC Charges "Miss Cleo" with Deceptive Advertising, Billing and Collection Practices|publisher=]|date=February 14, 2002|url=http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2002/02/accessresource.htm}}</ref> ], ], and ]. Psychic powers are asserted by ]s and in practices such as ] and even ].<ref name="Flim-Flam!">{{Cite book|author=James Randi|authorlink=James Randi|title=Flim-Flam! Psychics, ESP, Unicorns, and Other Delusions|publisher=Prometheus Books|pages=173–195|year=1982|ISBN=0-87975-198-3 Psychics encompass people in a variety of roles. Some are theatrical performers, such as ], who use various techniques, e.g. ], ], and ], to produce the appearance of such abilities for entertainment purposes. A large industry and network exist whereby people advertised as psychics provide advice and counsel to ].<ref name="nisbet">{{Cite journal|author=Matthew Nisbet|author-link=Matthew Nisbet |date=May–June 1998 |title=Psychic telephone networks profit on yearning, gullibility |journal=] |url=http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2843/is_/ai_20615402 }}{{dead link|date=May 2017 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> Some famous psychics include ], ], ], ], ],<ref name="ftc">{{Cite web|title=FTC Charges "Miss Cleo" with Deceptive Advertising, Billing and Collection Practices|publisher=]|date=February 14, 2002|url=http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2002/02/accessresource.htm|access-date=October 6, 2008|archive-date=August 28, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080828180436/http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2002/02/accessresource.htm|url-status=live}}</ref> ], ], and ]. Psychic powers are asserted by ]s and in practices such as ] and even ].<ref name="Flim-Flam!">{{Cite book|author=James Randi|author-link=James Randi|title=Flim-Flam! Psychics, ESP, Unicorns, and Other Delusions|publisher=Prometheus Books|pages=173–195|year=1982|isbn=978-0-87975-198-2
}}</ref> }}</ref>


Critics attribute psychic powers to intentional trickery or to self-].<ref name="Gracely">{{Cite web |last=Gracely, Ph.D. |first=Ed J. |title=Why Extraordinary Claims Demand Extraordinary Proof |work=PhACT |year=1998 |url=http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/extraproof.html |access-date=2007-07-31 |archive-date=2013-01-15 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130115045852/http://quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/extraproof.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="nova">{{Cite episode | title = Psychic Debunking | series = ] | network = ] | airdate = April 15, 1993 | season = 19 | number = 3}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|title=She Told Them Boy was Dead. Crystal Ball Fails Psychic in MO. Kidnap|newspaper=]|date=January 18, 2007|url=http://www.nydailynews.com/news/2007/01/18/2007-01-18_she_told_them_boy_was_dead_crystal_ball_.html|location=New York|access-date=2008-10-07|archive-date=2008-12-07|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081207174902/http://www.nydailynews.com/news/2007/01/18/2007-01-18_she_told_them_boy_was_dead_crystal_ball_.html|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Shooting crap:Alleged psychic John Edward actually gambles on hope and basic laws of statistics.|author=Shari Waxman|date=June 13, 2002|work=]|url=http://dir.salon.com/story/people/feature/2002/06/13/probability/index.html|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110607014609/http://dir.salon.com/story/people/feature/2002/06/13/probability/index.html|archive-date=June 7, 2011}}</ref> In 1988 the ] gave a report on the subject and concluded there is "no scientific justification from research conducted over a period of 130 years for the existence of ]".<ref name=NAS>{{Cite book|editor1=Druckman, D. |editor1-link=Daniel Druckman |editor2=Swets, J. A.|year=1988|title=Enhancing Human Performance: Issues, Theories and Techniques|publisher=National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.|page=22|isbn=978-0-309-07465-0}}</ref> A study attempted to repeat recently reported parapsychological experiments that appeared to support the existence of ]. Attempts to repeat the results, which involved performance on a memory test to ascertain if post-test information would affect it, "failed to produce significant effects" and thus "do not support the existence of psychic ability" of this kind.<ref>{{cite journal |vauthors=Ritchie SJ, Wiseman R, French CC |title=Failing the future: three unsuccessful attempts to replicate Bem's 'retroactive facilitation of recall' effect |journal=PLOS ONE |volume=7 |issue=3 |pages=e33423 |year=2012 |pmid=22432019 |pmc=3303812 |doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0033423 |bibcode=2012PLoSO...733423R |doi-access=free }}</ref>
Critics attribute psychic powers to intentional trickery or to self-].<ref name="Gracely">{{Cite web|last=Gracely, Ph.D. |first=Ed J. |title=Why Extraordinary Claims Demand Extraordinary Proof |work=PhACT |year=1998 |url=http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/extraproof.html
|accessdate=2007-07-31}}</ref><ref name="nova">{{Cite episode | title = Psychic Debunking | series = ] | network = ] | airdate = April 15, 1993 | season = 19 | seriesno = | number = 3}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|title=She Told Them Boy was Dead. Crystal Ball Fails Psychic in MO. Kidnap|newspaper=]|date=January 18, 2007|url=http://www.nydailynews.com/news/2007/01/18/2007-01-18_she_told_them_boy_was_dead_crystal_ball_.html|location=New York}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|title=Shooting crap:Alleged psychic John Edward actually gambles on hope and basic laws of statistics.|author=Shari Waxman|date=June 13, 2002|publisher=]|url=http://dir.salon.com/story/people/feature/2002/06/13/probability/index.html|deadurl=yes|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110607014609/http://dir.salon.com/story/people/feature/2002/06/13/probability/index.html|archivedate=June 7, 2011|df=}}</ref> In 1988 the ] gave a report on the subject and concluded there is "no scientific justification from research conducted over a period of 130 years for the existence of ]".<ref name=NAS>{{Cite book|author=Druckman, D. and Swets, J. A. eds.|year=1988|title=Enhancing Human Performance: Issues, Theories and Techniques|publisher=National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.|page=22|isbn=0-309-07465-7}}</ref> A study attempted to repeat recently reported parapsychological experiments that appeared to support the existence of precognition. Attempts to repeat the results, which involved performance on a memory test to ascertain if post-test information would affect it, "failed to produce significant effects", and thus "do not support the existence of psychic ability",<ref>{{cite journal |vauthors=Ritchie SJ, Wiseman R, French CC |title=Failing the future: three unsuccessful attempts to replicate Bem's 'retroactive facilitation of recall' effect |journal=PLoS ONE |volume=7 |issue=3 |pages=e33423 |year=2012 |pmid=22432019 |pmc=3303812 |doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0033423 |url=}}</ref> and is thus categorized as a ].


Psychics are frequently featured in ]. The ] franchise, for example, features "Force-sensitive" beings that can see into the future and move objects telepathically. People with psychic powers also appear regularly in ], such as in some of the works of ] or ], amongst many others. Psychics are sometimes featured in ] and ]. Examples of fiction featuring characters with psychic powers include the '']'' franchise, which features "]-sensitive" beings who can see into the future and move objects telekinetically, along with '']'' and some of the works of ], amongst many others.


==History== ==History==


===Etymology=== ===Etymology===
The word "psychic" is derived from the ] word ''psychikos'' ("of the mind" or "mental"), and refers in part to the human mind or psyche (ex. "psychic turmoil"). The Greek word also means "soul". In ], the maiden ] was the deification of the human ]. The word derivation of the Latin ''psȳchē'' is from the Greek ''psȳchḗ'', literally "breath", derivative of ''psȳ́chein'', to breathe or to blow (hence, to live).<ref>Henry George Liddell; Robert Scott, ''A Greek-English Lexicon'', </ref> The word "psychic" is derived from the ] word ''psychikos'' ("of the mind" or "mental"), and refers in part to the human mind or psyche (ex. "psychic turmoil"). The Greek word also means "soul". In ], the maiden ] was the deification of the human ]. The word derivation of the Latin ''psȳchē'' is from the Greek ''psȳchḗ'', literally "breath", derivative of ''psȳ́chein'', to breathe or to blow (hence, to live).<ref>Henry George Liddell; Robert Scott, ''A Greek-English Lexicon'', {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211023003900/http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.04.0057:entry=yuxh/&highlight=psyche |date=2021-10-23 }}</ref>


French astronomer and ] ] is credited as having first used the word psychic, while it was later introduced to the ] by ] in the 1870s.<ref name="Melton1">{{Cite book|title=Encyclopedia of Occultism & Parapsychology|chapter=Psychics|last=Melton|first=J.G.|publisher=]|year=1996|isbn=978-0-8103-9487-2}}</ref> French astronomer and ] ] is credited as having first used the word psychic, while it was later introduced to the ] by ] in the 1870s.<ref name="Melton1">{{Cite book|title=Encyclopedia of Occultism & Parapsychology|chapter=Psychics|last=Melton|first=J.G.|publisher=]|year=1996|isbn=978-0-8103-9487-2}}</ref>


===Early seers and prophets=== ===Early seers and prophets===
Elaborate systems of ] and ] date back to ancient times. Perhaps the most widely known system of early civilization fortune-telling was ], where practitioners believed the relative positions of ] could lend insight into people's lives and even predict their future circumstances. Some fortune-tellers were said to be able to make ] without the use of these elaborate systems (or in conjunction with them), through some sort of direct apprehension or ] of the future. These people were known as seers or ]s, and in later times as ] (French word meaning "clear sight" or "clear seeing") and psychics. Elaborate systems of ] and ] date back to ancient times. Perhaps the most widely known system of early civilization fortune-telling was ], where practitioners believed the relative positions of ] could lend insight into people's lives and even predict their future circumstances.{{Citation needed|date=August 2024}} Some fortune-tellers were said to be able to make ] without the use of these elaborate systems (or in conjunction with them), through some sort of direct apprehension or ] of the future.{{Citation needed|date=August 2024}} These people were known as seers or ]s, and in later times as ] (French word meaning "clear sight" or "clear seeing") and psychics.


Seers formed a functionary role in early civilization, often serving as advisors, priests, and judges.<ref name="Melton1" /> A number of examples are included in biblical accounts. The book of ] (Chapter 9) illustrates one such functionary task when ] is asked to find the donkeys of the future king ].<ref name="bible"></ref> The role of prophet appeared perennially in ancient cultures. In ], the priests of the sun deity ] at ] acted as seers. In ancient ] seers were referred to as ''nabu'', meaning "to call" or "announce".<ref name="Melton1" /> Seers formed a functionary role in early civilization, often serving as advisors, priests, and judges.<ref name="Melton1" /> A number of examples are included in biblical accounts. The book of ] (Chapter 9) illustrates one such functionary task when ] is asked to find the donkeys of the future king ].<ref name="bible">{{Cite web|url=https://www.mechon-mamre.org/p/pt/pt08a09.htm|title=1 Samuel 9 / Hebrew - English Bible / Mechon-Mamre|website=www.mechon-mamre.org|access-date=2021-12-23|archive-date=2021-12-23|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211223213102/https://www.mechon-mamre.org/p/pt/pt08a09.htm|url-status=dead}}</ref> The role of prophet appeared perennially in ancient cultures. In ], the priests of the sun deity ] at ] acted as seers. In ancient ] seers were referred to as ''nabu'', meaning "to call" or "announce".<ref name="Melton1" />


The ] is one of the earliest stories in ] of prophetic abilities. The ], the priestess presiding over the ] of ] at ], was believed to be able to deliver ] inspired by Apollo during rituals beginning in the 8th century BC.<ref name="Morgan">Morgan 1990, p. 148.</ref> It is often said that the Pythia delivered oracles in a frenzied state induced by vapors rising from the ground, and that she spoke gibberish, believed to be the voice of Apollo, which priests reshaped into the enigmatic prophecies preserved in Greek literature. Other scholars believe records from the time indicate that the Pythia spoke intelligibly, and gave prophecies in her own voice.<ref> The ] is one of the earliest stories in ] of prophetic abilities. The ], the priestess presiding over the ] of ] at ], was believed to be able to deliver ] inspired by Apollo during rituals beginning in the 8th century BC.<ref name="Morgan">Morgan 1990, p. 148.</ref> It is often said that the Pythia delivered oracles in a frenzied state induced by vapors rising from the ground, and that she spoke gibberish, believed to be the voice of Apollo, which priests reshaped into the enigmatic prophecies preserved in Greek literature. Other scholars believe records from the time indicate that the Pythia spoke intelligibly, and gave prophecies in her own voice.<ref>
*{{Cite book|title=The Delphic Oracle: Its Responses and Operations|last=Fontenrose|first=Joseph|year=1978|pages=196–227}} *{{Cite book|title=The Delphic Oracle: Its Responses and Operations|last=Fontenrose|first=Joseph|year=1978|pages=196–227}}
*{{Cite journal|title=The Voice at the Centre of the World: The Pythia's Ambiguity and Authority|last=Maurizio|first=Lisa|postscript=<!--None-->}} (in {{Cite book|title=Making Silence Speak: Women's Voices in Greek Literature and Society|last1=Lardinois|first1=Andre|last2=McClure|first2=Laura|pages=38–54|publisher=]|year=2001}})</ref> The Pythia was a position served by a succession of women probably selected from amongst a guild of priestesses of the temple. The last recorded response was given in 393 AD, when the emperor ] ordered pagan temples to cease operation. Recent geological investigations raise the possibility that ] gas caused the Pythia's state of inspiration.<ref> *{{Cite journal|title=The Voice at the Centre of the World: The Pythia's Ambiguity and Authority|last=Maurizio|first=Lisa}} (in {{Cite book|title=Making Silence Speak: Women's Voices in Greek Literature and Society|last1=Lardinois|first1=Andre|last2=McClure|first2=Laura|pages=38–54|publisher=]|year=2001}})</ref> The Pythia was a position served by a succession of women probably selected from amongst a guild of priestesses of the temple. The last recorded response was given in 393 AD, when the emperor ] ordered pagan temples to cease operation. Recent geological investigations raise the possibility that ] gas caused the Pythia's state of inspiration.<ref>*{{Cite journal|doi=10.1081/CLT-120004410|title=The Delphic Oracle: A Multidisciplinary Defense of the Gaseous Vent Theory|last1=Spiller|first1=Henry A.|last2=Hale|first2=John R.|last3=de Boer|first3=Jelle Z.|journal=Clinical Toxicology|volume=40|issue=2|year=2000|pages=189–196|pmid=12126193|s2cid=38994427}}
*{{Cite journal|doi=10.1081/CLT-120004410|title=The Delphic Oracle: A Multidisciplinary Defense of the Gaseous Vent Theory|last1=Spiller|first1=Henry A.|last2=Hale|first2=John R.|last3=de Boer|first3=Jelle Z.|journal=Clinical Toxicology|volume=40|issue=2|year=2000|pages=189–196|pmid=12126193}}
*{{Cite journal|doi=10.1130/0091-7613(2001)029<0707:NEFTGO>2.0.CO;2|title=New Evidence for the Geological Origins of the Ancient Delphic Oracle|last1=de Boer|first1=J.Z.|last2=Hale|first2=J.R.|last3=Chanton|first3=J.|journal=Geology|volume=29|issue=8|year=2001|pages=707–711}} *{{Cite journal|doi=10.1130/0091-7613(2001)029<0707:NEFTGO>2.0.CO;2|title=New Evidence for the Geological Origins of the Ancient Delphic Oracle|last1=de Boer|first1=J.Z.|last2=Hale|first2=J.R.|last3=Chanton|first3=J.|journal=Geology|volume=29|issue=8|year=2001|pages=707–711}}
*{{Cite journal|title=Questioning The Delphic Oracle|author1=John R. Hale|author2=Jelle Zeilinga de Boer|author3=Jeffrey P. Chandon|author4=Henry A. Spiller|magazine=]|date=August 2003}} *{{Cite magazine|title=Questioning The Delphic Oracle|author1=John R. Hale|author2=Jelle Zeilinga de Boer|author3=Jeffrey P. Chandon|author4=Henry A. Spiller|magazine=]|date=August 2003|volume=289|issue=2|pages=66–73|doi=10.1038/scientificamerican0803-66|pmid=12884540|bibcode=2003SciAm.289b..66H}}
*{{Cite web|title=The Prophet Of Gases|author=Betsy Mason|work=Science Now|date=October 2, 2006|url=http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2006/10/prophet-gases}}</ref> *{{Cite web|title=The Prophet Of Gases|author=Betsy Mason|work=Science Now|date=October 2, 2006|url=https://www.science.org/content/article/prophet-gases|access-date=June 30, 2022|archive-date=August 25, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220825104702/https://www.science.org/content/article/prophet-gases|url-status=live}}</ref>


One of the most enduring historical references to what some consider to be psychic ability is the prophecies of ] (1503–1566), often ] to Nostradamus, published during the ] period. Nostradamus was a ] ] and seer who wrote collections of ] that have since become famous worldwide and have rarely been out of print since his death. He is best known for his book ''Les Propheties'', the first edition of which appeared in 1555. Taken together, his written works are known to have contained at least 6,338 ]s or prophecies,<ref name="chevignard">{{Cite book|title=Présages de Nostradamus|last=Chevignard|first=Bernard|year=1999}}</ref> as well as at least eleven annual calendars. Most of the quatrains deal with disasters, such as plagues, earthquakes, wars, floods, invasions, murders, droughts, and battles – all undated. One of the most enduring historical references to what some consider to be psychic ability is the prophecies of ] (1503–1566), often ] to Nostradamus, published during the ] period. Nostradamus was a French ] and seer who wrote collections of ] that have since become famous worldwide and have rarely been out of print since his death. He is best known for his book ''Les Propheties'', the first edition of which appeared in 1555. Taken together, his written works are known to have contained at least 6,338 ]s or prophecies,<ref name="chevignard">{{Cite book|title=Présages de Nostradamus|last=Chevignard|first=Bernard|year=1999}}</ref> as well as at least eleven annual calendars. Most of the quatrains deal with disasters, such as plagues, earthquakes, wars, floods, invasions, murders, droughts, and battles – all undated.


Nostradamus is a controversial figure. His many enthusiasts, as well as the popular press, credit him with predicting many major world events. Interest in his work is still considerable, especially in the media and ]. By contrast, most academic scholars maintain that the associations made between world events and Nostradamus' quatrains are largely the result of misinterpretations or mistranslations (sometimes deliberate) or else are so tenuous as to render them useless as evidence of any genuine predictive power.<ref name="lemesurier">{{Cite book|title=The Unknown Nostradamus|last=Lemesurier|first=Peter|year=2003}}</ref> Nostradamus is a controversial figure. His many enthusiasts, as well as the popular press, credit him with predicting many major world events. Interest in his work is still considerable, especially in the media and ]. By contrast, most academic scholars maintain that the associations made between world events and Nostradamus' quatrains are largely the result of misinterpretations or mistranslations (sometimes deliberate) or else are so tenuous as to render them useless as evidence of any genuine predictive power.<ref name="lemesurier">{{Cite book|title=The Unknown Nostradamus|last=Lemesurier|first=Peter|year=2003}}</ref>


In addition to the belief that some historical figures were endowed with a predisposition to psychic experiences, some psychic abilities were thought to be available to everyone on occasion. For example, the belief in prophetic dreams was common and persistent in many ancient cultures.<ref name="Melton2">{{Cite book|last=Melton |first=J. G. |title=Dreams. In Encyclopedia of Occultism & Parapsychology |publisher=] |year=1996 |pages= |isbn=978-0-8103-9487-2}}</ref> Englishwoman ] demonstrated psychic abilities from her youth and foresaw historical events in the 16th century.<ref name="Porche Vaughan 2005 p. 31">{{cite book | last=Porche | first=J. | last2=Vaughan | first2=D. | title=Psychics and Mediums in Canada | publisher=Dundurn Press | year=2005 | isbn=978-1-77070-167-0 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=c-FNbSjucn4C&pg=PA31 | access-date=2023-05-30 | page=31 | archive-date=2023-05-30 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230530013652/https://books.google.com/books?id=c-FNbSjucn4C&pg=PA31 | url-status=live }}</ref> In addition to the belief that some historical figures were endowed with a predisposition to psychic experiences, some psychic abilities were thought to be available to everyone on occasion. For example, the belief in prophetic dreams was common and persistent in many ancient cultures.<ref name="Melton2">{{Cite book|last=Melton |first=J. G. |title=Dreams. In Encyclopedia of Occultism & Parapsychology |publisher=] |year=1996 |isbn=978-0-8103-9487-2}}</ref>


===Nineteenth-century progression=== ===Nineteenth-century progression===
] (1877–1945) was a psychic of the 20th century and made many highly publicized predictions.]] ] (1877–1945) was a psychic of the 20th century and made many highly publicized predictions.]]
In the mid-nineteenth century, ] became prominent in the United States and the United Kingdom. The movement's distinguishing feature was the belief that the ]s of the dead could be contacted by ]s to lend insight to the living.<ref name="Carroll1">{{Cite book|last=Carroll |first=Bret E. |title=Spiritualism in Antebellum America |publisher=Indiana University Press |year=1997 |pages= |isbn=0-253-33315-6}}</ref>{{Page needed|date=September 2010}} The movement was fueled in part by anecdotes of psychic powers. One such person believed to have extraordinary abilities was ], who gained fame during the ] period for his reported ability to levitate to various heights and speak to the dead.<ref name="Podmore">{{Cite book|last=Podmore |first=Frank |title=Mediums of the Nineteenth Century |publisher=University Books |year=1997 |pages= |isbn=0-253-33315-6}}</ref> In the mid-nineteenth century, ] became prominent in the United States and the United Kingdom. The movement's distinguishing feature was the belief that the spirits of the dead could be contacted by ]s to lend insight to the living.<ref name="Carroll1">{{Cite book|last=Carroll |first=Bret E. |title=Spiritualism in Antebellum America |publisher=Indiana University Press |year=1997 |isbn=978-0-253-33315-5}}</ref>{{Page needed|date=September 2010}} The movement was fueled in part by anecdotes of psychic powers. One such person believed to have extraordinary abilities was ], who gained fame during the ] period for his reported ability to levitate to various heights and speak to the dead.<ref name="Podmore">{{Cite book|last=Podmore |first=Frank |title=Mediums of the Nineteenth Century |publisher=University Books |year=1997 |isbn=978-0-253-33315-5}}</ref>


As the Spiritualist movement grew other comparable groups arose, including the ], which was co-founded in 1875 by ] (1831–1891). Theosophy coupled spiritualist elements with ] and was influential in the early 20th century, later influencing the ] movement during the 1970s. Blavatsky herself claimed numerous psychic powers.<ref name="Melton3">Melton. Chapter "Theosophical Society"</ref> As the Spiritualist movement grew, other comparable groups arose, including the ], which was co-founded in 1875 by ] (1831–1891). Theosophy coupled spiritualist elements with ] and was influential in the early 20th century, later influencing the ] movement during the 1970s. Blavatsky herself claimed numerous psychic powers.<ref name="Melton3">Melton. Chapter "Theosophical Society"</ref>


===Late twentieth century=== ===Late twentieth century===
By the late twentieth century psychics were commonly associated with ] culture.<ref>Diane Daniel ''The Boston Globe'' (Calendar cover story cache 1999)</ref> ]s and advertising for psychics were very common from the 1960s on, as readings were offered for a fee and given in settings such as over the phones, in a home, or at psychic fairs.<ref>Wendy Haskett ''LATimes.com'', August 15, 1987</ref> By the late twentieth century, psychics were commonly associated with ] culture.<ref>Diane Daniel {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110927092203/http://cache.boston.com/globe/calendar/features/psychics/printable.shtml |date=2011-09-27 }} ''The Boston Globe'' (Calendar cover story cache 1999)</ref> ]s and advertising for psychics were common from the 1960s on, as readings were offered for a fee and given in settings such as over the phone, in a home, or at psychic fairs.<ref>Wendy Haskett ''LATimes.com'', August 15, 1987</ref>


==Popular culture== ==Popular culture==


===Belief in psychic abilities=== ===Belief in psychic abilities===
In a survey, reported in 1990, of members of the National Academy of Sciences, only 2% of respondents thought that ] had been scientifically demonstrated, with another 2% thinking that the phenomena happened sometimes. Asked about research in the field, 22% thought that it should be discouraged, 63% that it should be allowed but not encouraged, and 10% that it should be encouraged; ]s were the most hostile to ] of all the specialties.<ref name="mcconnell">McConnell, R.A., and Clark, T.K. (1991). "National Academy of Sciences' Opinion on Parapsychology" Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research, 85, 333–365.</ref><ref name="stokes">Douglas M. Stokes, , Journal of Parapsychology, Sept, 1992, Retrieved July 4, 2009</ref> In a 1990 survey of members of the National Academy of Sciences, only 2% of the respondents thought that ] had been scientifically demonstrated, with another 2% thinking that the phenomena happened sometimes. Asked about research in the field, 22% thought that it should be discouraged, 63% that it should be allowed but not encouraged, and 10% that it should be encouraged; ]s were the most hostile to ] of all the specialties.<ref name="mcconnell">McConnell, R.A., and Clark, T.K. (1991). "National Academy of Sciences' Opinion on Parapsychology" Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research, 85, 333–365.</ref><ref name="stokes">Douglas M. Stokes, , Journal of Parapsychology, Sept, 1992, Retrieved July 4, 2009</ref>


A survey of the beliefs of the general United States population about paranormal topics was conducted by ] in 2005.<ref name=gallup>{{Cite web|url=http://www.gallup.com/poll/16915/Three-Four-Americans-Believe-Paranormal.aspx |title=Three in Four Americans Believe in Paranormal |author=David W. Moore |date=June 16, 2005 |publisher=] |accessdate=2008-10-08 }}<br>, Skeptical Inquirer, accessed October 28, 2006</ref> The survey found that 41 percent of those polled believed in ] and 26 percent believed in ]. 31 percent of those surveyed indicated that they believe in telepathy or psychic communication. A survey of the beliefs of the general United States population about paranormal topics was conducted by ] in 2005.<ref name=gallup>{{Cite web |url=http://www.gallup.com/poll/16915/Three-Four-Americans-Believe-Paranormal.aspx |title=Three in Four Americans Believe in Paranormal |author=David W. Moore |date=June 16, 2005 |publisher=] |access-date=2008-10-08 |archive-date=2017-09-19 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170919195101/https://news.gallup.com/poll/16915/three-four-americans-believe-paranormal.aspx |url-status=live }}<br>, Skeptical Inquirer, accessed October 28, 2006</ref> The survey found that 41 percent of those polled believed in ] and 26 percent believed in ]. 31 percent of those surveyed indicated that they believe in telepathy or psychic communication.


A poll of 439 college students conducted in 2006 by researchers Bryan Farha of ] and Gary Steward of ], suggested that college seniors and graduate students were more likely to believe in psychic phenomena than college freshmen.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Paranormal Beliefs – An Analysis of College Students|url=http://www.allthingspsychic.com/PsychicBeliefPoll.html}}</ref> Twenty-three percent of college freshmen expressed a belief in paranormal ideas. The percentage was greater among college seniors (31%) and graduate students (34%).<ref>Britt, R.: LiveScience, January 2006, Retrieved September 18, 2007.</ref> The poll showed lower belief in psychic phenomena among science students than social science and education students. A poll of 439 college students conducted in 2006 by researchers Bryan Farha of ] and Gary Steward of ], suggested that college seniors and graduate students were more likely to believe in psychic phenomena than college freshmen.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.allthingspsychic.com/PsychicBeliefPoll.html|title=Paranormal Belief Poll|website=www.allthingspsychic.com|access-date=2021-12-23|archive-date=2021-12-23|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211223213103/https://www.allthingspsychic.com/PsychicBeliefPoll.html|url-status=live}}</ref> Twenty-three percent of college freshmen expressed a belief in paranormal ideas. The percentage was greater among college seniors (31%) and graduate students (34%).<ref>Britt, R.: {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070714192645/http://www.livescience.com/strangenews/060121_paranormal_poll.html |date=2007-07-14 }} LiveScience, January 2006, Retrieved September 18, 2007.</ref> The poll showed lower belief in psychic phenomena among science students than social science and education students.


Some people also believe that anyone can have psychic abilities which can be activated or enhanced through the study and practice of various disciplines and techniques such as meditation and divination, with a number of books and websites being dedicated to instruction in these methods.<ref>{{cite book |last=Chauran|first=Alexandra |title=So You Want To Be a Psychic Intuitive''|publisher=Llewellyn Worldwide|year=2012|isbn =0738730653 }}</ref> Another popular belief is that psychic ability is hereditary, with a psychic parent passing his or her abilities on to their children.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Psychics – myths & misconceptions|url=http://www.hark.net.au/articles/psychics_info.htm|accessdate=April 25, 2007}}</ref> Some people also believe that anyone can have psychic abilities which can be activated or enhanced through the study and practice of various disciplines and techniques such as meditation and divination, with a number of books and websites being dedicated to instruction in these methods.<ref>{{cite book |last=Chauran|first=Alexandra |title=So You Want To Be a Psychic Intuitive|publisher=Llewellyn Worldwide|year=2012|isbn =978-0738730653 }}</ref> Another popular belief is that psychic ability is hereditary, with a psychic parent passing their abilities on to their children.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Psychics – myths & misconceptions|url=http://www.hark.net.au/articles/psychics_info.htm|access-date=April 25, 2007|archive-date=April 16, 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070416104517/http://www.hark.net.au/articles/psychics_info.htm|url-status=dead}}</ref>


===Science fiction=== ===Science fiction===
{{unreferenced section|date=September 2017}} {{unreferenced section|date=September 2017}}
Psychic abilities are common in ], often under the term "]". They may be depicted as innate and heritable, as in ]'s '']'', ]'s '']'', ]'s ] series or setting, and the television series '']''. Another recurring ] is the conveyance of psychic power through psychoactive drugs, as in the '']'' novels and indirectly in the '']'' films, as well as the ghosts in the ] franchise. Somewhat differently, in ]'s '']'' and ]'s '']'', psychic abilities may be achieved by any human who learns the proper mental discipline, known as ''kything'' in the former work. Popular movies include '']''. Psychic characters are also common in ] ]s, for instance ], ] and ] as well as many others from the Marvel comics' "]". More characters include the characters Raven Baxter and Booker Baxter from the ] ] and its spin-off ]. The Disney Channel Original Series ] features recurring characters Cara and Sara, who are twin psychics claimed to be the descendants of the ], their visions also contrast their personalities (Cara is a Goth that sees only positive visions, while Sara is always in a good mood despite only seeing negative visions). Psychic abilities are common in ], often under the term "]". They may be depicted as innate and heritable, as in ]'s '']'', ]'s '']'', ]'s ] series or setting, and the television series '']''. Another recurring ] is the conveyance of psychic power through ]s, as in the '']'' novels and indirectly in the '']'' films, as well as the ghosts in the '']'' franchise. Somewhat differently, in ]'s '']'' and ]'s '']'', psychic abilities may be achieved by any human who learns the proper ], known as ''kything'' in the former work. Popular movies include '']''. Psychic characters are also common in ], for instance ], ] and ] as well as many others from the Marvel Comics' ]. More characters include the characters Raven Baxter and Booker Baxter from the ] '']'' and its spin-off '']''. The Disney Channel Original Series '']'' features recurring characters Cara and Sara, who are twin psychics claimed to be the descendants of the ], their visions also contrast their personalities (Cara is a ] that sees only positive visions, while Sara is always in a good mood despite only seeing negative visions).


==Criticism and research== ==Criticism and research==
] whose results have been criticized as being misinterpreted as evidence for ]]] ] has attempted to use ] to test for ], mild sensory deprivation in the ] to test for ], and research trials conducted under contract by the U.S. government to investigate ]. Critics such as Ed J. Gracely say that this evidence is not sufficient for acceptance, partly because the intrinsic probability of psychic phenomena is very small.<ref name="Gracely"/> ] whose results have been criticized as being misinterpreted as evidence for ]]] ] has attempted to use ] to test for ], mild sensory deprivation in the ] to test for ], and research trials conducted under contract by the U.S. government to investigate ]. Critics such as Ed J. Gracely say that this evidence is not sufficient for acceptance, partly because the intrinsic probability of psychic phenomena is very small.<ref name="Gracely"/>


Critics such as ] and the ] suggest that parapsychology has methodological flaws that can explain the experimental results that parapsychologists attribute to paranormal explanations, and various critics have classed the field as ]. This has largely been due to lack of replication of results by independent experimenters.<ref name=NSF2006>{{Cite journal|format= |title=Science and Engineering Indicators 2006 |publisher=] |year=2006 |url=https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind06/c7/c7s2.htm#c7s2l3 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://wayback.archive-it.org/5902/20150818094952/https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind06/c7/c7s2.htm |archivedate=2015-08-18 |df= }}</ref><ref name=Hyman>{{Cite journal|last=Hyman |first=Ray |authorlink=Ray Hyman |title=Evaluation of the program on anomalous mental phenomena |journal=The Journal of Parapsychology |volume=59 |issue=1 |year=1995 |url=http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2320/is_n4_v59/ai_18445600 |archive-url=https://archive.is/20120709142606/http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2320/is_n4_v59/ai_18445600 |dead-url=yes |archive-date=2012-07-09 |accessdate=2007-07-30 }}</ref><ref name=Akers>{{Cite journal |author=Akers, C. |title=Methodological Criticisms of Parapsychology, Advances in Parapsychological Research 4 |publisher=PesquisaPSI |year=1986 |url=http://www.pesquisapsi.com/books/advances4/7_Methodological_Criticisms.html |accessdate=2007-07-30 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20070927223348/http://www.pesquisapsi.com/books/advances4/7_Methodological_Criticisms.html |archivedate=2007-09-27 |df= }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal Critics such as ] and the ] suggest that parapsychology has methodological flaws that can explain the experimental results that parapsychologists attribute to paranormal explanations, and various critics have classed the field as ]. This has largely been due to a lack of replication of results by independent experimenters.<ref name=NSF2006>{{Cite journal|title=Science and Engineering Indicators 2006 |publisher=] |year=2006 |url=https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind06/c7/c7s2.htm#c7s2l3 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://wayback.archive-it.org/5902/20150818094952/https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind06/c7/c7s2.htm |archive-date=2015-08-18 }}</ref><ref name=Hyman>{{Cite journal|last=Hyman |first=Ray |author-link=Ray Hyman |title=Evaluation of the program on anomalous mental phenomena |journal=The Journal of Parapsychology |volume=59 |issue=1 |year=1995 |url=http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2320/is_n4_v59/ai_18445600 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20120709142606/http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2320/is_n4_v59/ai_18445600 |url-status=dead |archive-date=2012-07-09 |access-date=2007-07-30 }}</ref><ref name=Akers>{{Cite journal |author=Akers, C. |title=Methodological Criticisms of Parapsychology, Advances in Parapsychological Research 4 |publisher=PesquisaPSI |year=1986 |url=http://www.pesquisapsi.com/books/advances4/7_Methodological_Criticisms.html |access-date=2007-07-30 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070927223348/http://www.pesquisapsi.com/books/advances4/7_Methodological_Criticisms.html |archive-date=2007-09-27 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal
|author=Child, I.L. |author=Child, I.L.
|title=Criticism in Experimental Parapsychology, Advances in Parapsychological Research 5 |title=Criticism in Experimental Parapsychology, Advances in Parapsychological Research 5
Line 71: Line 70:
|year=1987 |year=1987
|url=http://www.pesquisapsi.com/books/advances5/6_Criticism_in_Experimental.html |url=http://www.pesquisapsi.com/books/advances5/6_Criticism_in_Experimental.html
|accessdate=2007-07-30 |access-date=2007-07-30
|deadurl=yes |url-status=dead
|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20070927223410/http://www.pesquisapsi.com/books/advances5/6_Criticism_in_Experimental.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070927223410/http://www.pesquisapsi.com/books/advances5/6_Criticism_in_Experimental.html
|archivedate=2007-09-27 |archive-date=2007-09-27
}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Wiseman |first=Richard |author2=Smith, Matthew |title=Exploring possible sender-to-experimenter acoustic leakage in the PRL autoganzfeld experiments – Psychophysical Research Laboratories |journal=The Journal of Parapsychology |year=1996 |url=http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2320/is_n2_v60/ai_18960809 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20120709230555/http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2320/is_n2_v60/ai_18960809 |url-status=dead |archive-date=2012-07-09 |access-date=2007-07-30 |display-authors=etal }}</ref>
|df=
}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Wiseman |first=Richard |authorlink= |author2=Smith, Matthew |title=Exploring possible sender-to-experimenter acoustic leakage in the PRL autoganzfeld experiments – Psychophysical Research Laboratories |journal=The Journal of Parapsychology |year=1996 |url=http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2320/is_n2_v60/ai_18960809 |archive-url=https://archive.is/20120709230555/http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2320/is_n2_v60/ai_18960809 |dead-url=yes |archive-date=2012-07-09 |accessdate=2007-07-30 |display-authors=etal }}</ref>


The evidence presented for psychic phenomena is not sufficiently verified for scientific acceptance, and there exist many non-paranormal alternative explanations for claimed instances of psychic events. ], who generally believe that there is some evidence for psychic ability, disagree with critics who believe that no psychic ability exists and that many of the instances of more popular psychic phenomena such as ], can be attributed to non-paranormal techniques such as ], ], or even self-].<ref name=critandcont1>EBauer, berhard (1984) " {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070621043016/http://www.psy.gu.se/EJP/EJP1984Bauer.pdf |date=2007-06-21 }}", Department of Psychology, University of Freiburg, European Journal of Parapsychology, 5, 141–166 (2007-02-09)</ref><ref name=mediumship1>O'Keeffe, Ciarán and Wiseman Richard (2005) " {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070207093521/http://www.psy.herts.ac.uk/wiseman/papers/MediumBJP.pdf |date=2007-02-07 }}", British Journal of Psychology, 96, 165–17</ref> Cold reading techniques would include psychics using flattery, intentionally making descriptions, statements or predictions about a person vague and ambiguous, and surreptitiously moving on to another prediction when the psychic deems the audience to be non-responsive.<ref>{{cite book |last = Wiseman |first = Richard |authorlink = Richard Wiseman |date = 2011 |title = ''Paranormality'' |pages=36-38}}</ref> ] such as ], ] and ] have demonstrated techniques and results similar to those of popular psychics, but they present physical and psychological explanations as opposed to paranormal ones.{{cn|date=November 2018}} The evidence presented for psychic phenomena is not sufficiently verified for scientific acceptance, and there exist many non-paranormal alternative explanations for claimed instances of psychic events. ], who generally believe that there is some evidence for psychic ability, disagree with critics who believe that no psychic ability exists and that many of the instances of more popular psychic phenomena such as ], can be attributed to non-paranormal techniques such as ], ], or even self-].<ref name=critandcont1>EBauer, berhard (1984) " {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070621043016/http://www.psy.gu.se/EJP/EJP1984Bauer.pdf |date=2007-06-21 }}", Department of Psychology, University of Freiburg, European Journal of Parapsychology, 5, 141–166 (2007-02-09)</ref><ref name=mediumship1>O'Keeffe, Ciarán and Wiseman Richard (2005) " {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070207093521/http://www.psy.herts.ac.uk/wiseman/papers/MediumBJP.pdf |date=2007-02-07 }}", British Journal of Psychology, 96, 165–17</ref> Cold reading techniques would include psychics using flattery, intentionally making descriptions, statements or predictions about a person vague and ambiguous, and surreptitiously moving on to another prediction when the psychic deems the audience to be non-responsive.<ref>{{cite book |last = Wiseman |first = Richard |author-link = Richard Wiseman |date = 2011 |title = ''Paranormality'' |pages=36–38}}</ref> ] such as ], ] and ] have demonstrated techniques and results similar to those of popular psychics, but they present physical and psychological explanations as opposed to paranormal ones.{{citation needed|date=November 2018}}


In January 2008 the results of a study using ] were published. To provide what are purported to be the most favorable experimental conditions, the study included appropriate emotional stimuli and had participants who are biologically or emotionally related, such as twins. The experiment was designed to produce positive results if ], ] or ] occurred, but despite this no distinguishable neuronal responses were found between psychic stimuli and non-psychic stimuli, while variations in the same stimuli showed anticipated effects on patterns of brain activation. The researchers concluded that "These findings are the strongest evidence yet obtained against the existence of paranormal mental phenomena."<ref name=MK>{{Cite journal |vauthors=Moulton ST, Kosslyn SM |title=Using neuroimaging to resolve the psi debate |journal=Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience |volume=20 |issue=1 |pages=182–92 |date=January 2008 |pmid=18095790 |doi=10.1162/jocn.2008.20.1.182 |url=http://www.creativespirit.net/psiresearch/neuroimagepsi.pdf |access-date=2017-11-01 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170812011925/http://www.creativespirit.net/psiresearch/neuroimagepsi.pdf |archive-date=2017-08-12 |dead-url=yes |df= }}</ref> ] had cautioned the researchers against the wording of said statement.<ref>Science contradicts Psi, Skeptical Inquirer, July/August 2008</ref> In January 2008 the results of a study using ] were published. To provide what are purported to be the most favorable experimental conditions, the study included appropriate emotional stimuli and had participants who are biologically or emotionally related, such as twins. The experiment was designed to produce positive results if ], ] or ] occurred, but despite this, no distinguishable neuronal responses were found between psychic stimuli and non-psychic stimuli, while variations in the same stimuli showed anticipated effects on patterns of brain activation. The researchers concluded that "These findings are the strongest evidence yet obtained against the existence of paranormal mental phenomena."<ref name=MK>{{Cite journal |vauthors=Moulton ST, Kosslyn SM |title=Using neuroimaging to resolve the psi debate |journal=Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience |volume=20 |issue=1 |pages=182–92 |date=January 2008 |pmid=18095790 |doi=10.1162/jocn.2008.20.1.182 |url=http://www.creativespirit.net/psiresearch/neuroimagepsi.pdf |access-date=2017-11-01 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170812011925/http://www.creativespirit.net/psiresearch/neuroimagepsi.pdf |archive-date=2017-08-12 |url-status=dead }}</ref> ] had cautioned the researchers against the wording of said statement.<ref>Science contradicts Psi, Skeptical Inquirer, July/August 2008</ref>


A detailed study of ] predictions about missing persons and murder cases has found that despite her repeated claims to be more than 85% correct, "Browne has not even been mostly correct in a single case".<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Shafer | first1 = R | last2 = Jadwiszczok | first2 = A. | year = 2010 | title = Psychic defective: Sylvia Browne's history of failure | url = http://www.csicop.org/si/show/psychic_defective_sylvia_brownes_history_of_failure/ | journal = ] | volume = 34 | issue = 2| pages = 38–42 }}</ref> Concerning the television psychics, ] states that testing psychics in a studio setting is difficult as there are too many areas to control: the psychic could be getting help from anyone on the set. The editor controls everything; they can make a psychic look superior or ridiculous depending on direction from the producer. In an ] ''exposé'' of ] and ] they discovered that what was actually said on the tape day, and what was broadcast to the public were "substantially different in the accuracy. They're getting rid of the wrong guesses... Once you pull back the curtain and see how it's done, it's not impressive at all."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2007-09-21/news/0709210538_1_psychics-james-van-praagh-reality-tv |title=Putting Psychics to the Test|publisher=] |date=2011-09-21 |accessdate=2011-09-12}}</ref> A detailed study of ] predictions about missing persons and murder cases found that despite her repeated claims to be more than 85% correct, "Browne has not even been mostly correct in a single case".<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Shafer | first1 = R | last2 = Jadwiszczok | first2 = A. | year = 2010 | title = Psychic defective: Sylvia Browne's history of failure | url = http://www.csicop.org/si/show/psychic_defective_sylvia_brownes_history_of_failure/ | journal = ] | volume = 34 | issue = 2 | pages = 38–42 | access-date = 2010-05-13 | archive-date = 2012-12-23 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20121223092014/http://www.csicop.org/si/show/psychic_defective_sylvia_brownes_history_of_failure/ | url-status = live }}</ref> Concerning the television psychics, ] states that testing psychics in a studio setting is difficult as there are too many areas to control: the psychic could be getting help from anyone on the set. The editor controls everything; they can make a psychic look superior or ridiculous depending on direction from the producer. In an ] ''exposé'' of ] and ] they discovered that what was actually said on the tape day, and what was broadcast to the public were "substantially different in the accuracy. They're getting rid of the wrong guesses... Once you pull back the curtain and see how it's done, it's not impressive at all."<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.chicagotribune.com/2007/09/21/putting-psychics-to-the-test/ |title=Putting Psychics to the Test |newspaper=] |date=2011-09-21 |access-date=2011-09-12 |archive-date=2012-10-07 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121007044842/http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2007-09-21/news/0709210538_1_psychics-james-van-praagh-reality-tv |url-status=live }}</ref>


], Chief Investigator for the ], and producer and presenter of ''The Skeptic Zone'' podcast sought to answer the question “Can self-proclaimed psychics predict unlikely future events with any greater accuracy than chance?”<ref name="Palmer">{{Cite web |last=Palmer |first=Rob |date=March–April 2022 |title=The Great Australian Psychic Prediction Project: Pondering the Published Predictions of Prominent Psychics |url=https://skepticalinquirer.org/2022/02/the-great-australian-psychic-prediction-project-pondering-the-published-predictions-of-prominent-psychics/ |access-date=29 January 2023 |website=Skeptical Inquirer |archive-date=1 February 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230201191853/https://skepticalinquirer.org/2022/02/the-great-australian-psychic-prediction-project-pondering-the-published-predictions-of-prominent-psychics/ |url-status=live }}</ref> To answer that question he launched "The Great Australian Psychic Prediction Project". Over the course of 12 years, Saunders and then Saunders and his international team of skeptics - Michelle Bijkersma, Kelly Burke, ], Adrienne Hill, Louis Hillman, Wendy Hughes, Paula Lauterbach, Dr. Angie Mattke, Rob Palmer, and Leonard Tramiel - searched through Australian published media for individuals making psychic or otherwise paranormal predictions.<ref name="Palmer" />
] ] has summarized a number of techniques, which she says are used by psychics to create their effects.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Gerbic|first1=Susan|authorlink= Susan Gerbic|title=Ten Tricks of the Psychics I Bet You Didn’t Know|url=https://www.csicop.org/specialarticles/show/ten_tricks_of_the_psychics_i_bet_you_didnrsquot_know|website=CSI|publisher=Committee for Skeptical Inquiry|accessdate=23 March 2018}}</ref>

The goal of the Great Australian Psychic Prediction Project was to collect and then vet the accuracy of every published psychic prediction in Australia since the year 2000. The team analyzed over 3800 predictions made by 207 psychics over the years 2000 to 2020. While a few of the psychic predictions were about events outside of Australia, the predictions primarily focused on celebrities, scandals, natural disasters, weather patterns, sports, and real estate trends.<ref name="Saunders">{{cite web |last1=Saunders |first1=Richard |title=The Great Australian Psychic Prediction Project |url=https://www.skeptics.com.au/wp-content/uploads/magazine/The%20Skeptic%20Volume%2041%20(2021)%20No%204.pdf |publisher=The Skeptic |access-date=29 January 2023 |archive-date=6 January 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230106165737/https://www.skeptics.com.au/wp-content/uploads/magazine/The%20Skeptic%20Volume%2041%20%282021%29%20No%204.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref>

The results of the analysis of the predictions found that psychics were correct 11% of the time, wrong 35% of the time, and that some predictions were too vague to characterize (19%) or the predicted outcome was so obvious it was to be expected (15%). Two percent of the predictions were unable to be categorized.<ref name="Saunders" />

The main conclusions of the Great Australian Psychic Prediction Project were:<ref name="Palmer" /> <br>“Psychics are appallingly bad at predicting future events.” <br> “Most predictions were too vague, expected, or simply wrong.” <br> “Most of what happens is not predicted, and most of what is predicted does not happen.”

The Project confirmed that even when considering the margin of error, it is difficult to come to any other conclusion except that people who claim to see into the future cannot do so with a rate of success better than that of educated guesswork, chance, or luck.<ref name="Saunders" />

==Psychic fraud==
In an article reported by Pat Foran in ], an Ontario woman, known as Marie Jean, depressed after having to sell her home, began seeing a psychic who went by the name of Maha Dev. Marie Jean reported that Dev claimed she was surrounded by "evil spirits" and that "(her) life could be in danger and (her) sons could lose their lives." The initial payment requested was $10,000 to remove the spirits, but in subsequent visits Dev indicated that the spirits were "too strong" and more money was needed. In total, the woman paid $46,000 before deciding she had been "duped." After Marie Jean reported the incident to CTV News, CTV News contacted the psychic. While Dev did not admit to knowing the woman, the money was refunded in full the next day.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Foran |first1=Pat |title='I feel used': Ont. woman hands over nearly $50K to psychic who promised to cleanse her of evil spirits |url=https://toronto.ctvnews.ca/i-feel-used-ont-woman-hands-over-nearly-50k-to-psychic-who-promised-to-cleanse-her-of-evil-spirits-1.6935519?ICID=ref_fark |website=CTV News |publisher=CTV News |access-date=29 June 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240621183624/https://toronto.ctvnews.ca/i-feel-used-ont-woman-hands-over-nearly-50k-to-psychic-who-promised-to-cleanse-her-of-evil-spirits-1.6935519?ICID=ref_fark |archive-date=21 June 2024}}</ref>

Falling for a psychic scam can result in a loss of one's entire life savings. In an example given in an article by Rob Palmer<ref name="Harm">{{cite web |last1=Palmer |first1=Rob |title=Belief in Psychics: What's the Harm and Who's to Blame? |url=https://skepticalinquirer.org/exclusive/belief-in-psychics-whats-the-harm-and-whos-to-blame/ |publisher=Skeptical Inquirer |access-date=17 November 2022 |archive-date=17 November 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221117235555/https://skepticalinquirer.org/exclusive/belief-in-psychics-whats-the-harm-and-whos-to-blame/ |url-status=live }}</ref> a woman gave a psychic $41,642 over a period of 10 weeks. The woman had contacted Palmer for help, who put her in contact with ], a private investigator who specializes in psychic fraud cases. Palmer had previously written articles about Nygaard and the work he was doing.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Palmer |first1=Rob |title=Introducing Psychic-Busting Private Eye Bob Nygaard (Part 1) |url=https://skepticalinquirer.org/exclusive/introducing-psychic-busting-private-eye-bob-nygaard-part-1/ |publisher=Skeptical Inquirer |access-date=2022-11-18 |archive-date=2018-08-23 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180823204858/https://www.csicop.org/specialarticles/show/introducing_psychic-busting_private_eye_bob_nygaard_part_1 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=Palmer |first1=Rob |title=Introducing Psychic-Busting Private Eye Bob Nygaard (Part 2) |url=https://skepticalinquirer.org/exclusive/introducing-psychic-busting-private-eye-bob-nygaard-part-2/ |publisher=Skeptical Inquirer |access-date=2022-11-18 |archive-date=2022-11-18 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221118001059/https://skepticalinquirer.org/exclusive/introducing-psychic-busting-private-eye-bob-nygaard-part-2/ |url-status=live }}</ref>

It is apparently difficult to get cases of psychic fraud prosecuted as a crime. Palmer states "when someone reports to law enforcement that they are a victim of this type of fraud, they are often turned away and told it is a civil matter." Palmer goes on to discuss ] and other famous "psychics" who were proven to be frauds.<ref name="Harm"/> Investigator ] states that "scammers use various psychological principles to ensnare their prey". Their state of mind, belief in psychic abilities, unhappiness with something happening in their lives and looking for answers. The psychic will instruct the client not to tell their friends or family as they know they may be warned away from the psychic.

With curse removal, the psychic may say that the magic will not work or get worse if they do tell anyone about their involvement with the psychic. The con games from psychics, according to Radford, can "play out over the course of weeks, months, or even years." The psychic is playing the long game and looking to extract as much money as possible. Radford claims that when a victim realizes they have been scammed, often they are too embarrassed to come forward.<ref name="Radford 2017">{{cite journal |last1=Radford |first1=Ben |author-link=Ben Radford|title=Psychic Arrested in Exorcism Scam |journal=Skeptical Inquirer |date=2017 |volume=41 |issue=1 |pages=12–13 |publisher=Committee for Skeptical Inquirer}}</ref>

] ] has summarized a number of techniques, which she says are used by psychics to create their effects.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Gerbic|first1=Susan|author-link=Susan Gerbic|title=Ten Tricks of the Psychics I Bet You Didn't Know|url=https://www.csicop.org/specialarticles/show/ten_tricks_of_the_psychics_i_bet_you_didnrsquot_know|website=CSI|date=23 March 2018|publisher=Committee for Skeptical Inquiry|access-date=23 March 2018|archive-date=24 March 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180324101552/https://www.csicop.org/specialarticles/show/ten_tricks_of_the_psychics_i_bet_you_didnrsquot_know|url-status=live}}</ref>


==See also== <!-- Please respect alphabetical order --> ==See also== <!-- Please respect alphabetical order -->
{{columns-list|colwidth=20em| {{Columns-list|colwidth=20em|
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
Line 102: Line 120:
* ] * ]
}} }}

== Notes ==
{{Notelist}}


==References== ==References==
Line 108: Line 129:
==External links== ==External links==
{{Wiktionary|psychic}} {{Wiktionary|psychic}}
{{Commonscat-inline|Psychics}} {{Commons category-inline|Psychics}}
<!-- <!--
ATTENTION! DO NOT ADD OR REMOVE LINKS WITHOUT DISCUSSION AND CONSENSUS ON THE TALK PAGE. OTHERWISE THEY WILL BE REMOVED OR REPLACED. ATTENTION! DO NOT ADD OR REMOVE LINKS WITHOUT DISCUSSION AND CONSENSUS ON THE TALK PAGE. OTHERWISE THEY WILL BE REMOVED OR REPLACED.
Line 117: Line 138:


{{Parapsychology|state=collapsed}} {{Parapsychology|state=collapsed}}
{{Authority control}}


] ]
]
] ]
]

Latest revision as of 13:57, 6 December 2024

Person claiming extrasensory perception abilities For other uses, see Psychic (disambiguation).
Part of a series on the
Paranormal
Storefront psychic fortuneteller in Boston
Main articles
Skepticism
Parapsychology
Related

A psychic is a person who claims to use powers rooted in parapsychology, such as extrasensory perception (ESP), to identify information hidden from the normal senses, particularly involving telepathy or clairvoyance; or who performs acts that are apparently inexplicable by natural laws, such as psychokinesis or teleportation. Although many people believe in psychic abilities, the scientific consensus is that there is no proof of the existence of such powers, and describes the practice as pseudoscience.

Psychics encompass people in a variety of roles. Some are theatrical performers, such as stage magicians, who use various techniques, e.g. prestidigitation, cold reading, and hot reading, to produce the appearance of such abilities for entertainment purposes. A large industry and network exist whereby people advertised as psychics provide advice and counsel to clients. Some famous psychics include Edgar Cayce, Ingo Swann, Peter Hurkos, Janet Lee, Miss Cleo, John Edward, Sylvia Browne, and Tyler Henry. Psychic powers are asserted by psychic detectives and in practices such as psychic archaeology and even psychic surgery.

Critics attribute psychic powers to intentional trickery or to self-delusion. In 1988 the U.S. National Academy of Sciences gave a report on the subject and concluded there is "no scientific justification from research conducted over a period of 130 years for the existence of parapsychological phenomena". A study attempted to repeat recently reported parapsychological experiments that appeared to support the existence of precognition. Attempts to repeat the results, which involved performance on a memory test to ascertain if post-test information would affect it, "failed to produce significant effects" and thus "do not support the existence of psychic ability" of this kind.

Psychics are sometimes featured in science fiction and fantasy fiction. Examples of fiction featuring characters with psychic powers include the Star Wars franchise, which features "Force-sensitive" beings who can see into the future and move objects telekinetically, along with Dungeons & Dragons and some of the works of Stephen King, amongst many others.

History

Etymology

The word "psychic" is derived from the Greek word psychikos ("of the mind" or "mental"), and refers in part to the human mind or psyche (ex. "psychic turmoil"). The Greek word also means "soul". In Greek mythology, the maiden Psyche was the deification of the human soul. The word derivation of the Latin psȳchē is from the Greek psȳchḗ, literally "breath", derivative of psȳ́chein, to breathe or to blow (hence, to live).

French astronomer and spiritualist Camille Flammarion is credited as having first used the word psychic, while it was later introduced to the English language by Edward William Cox in the 1870s.

Early seers and prophets

Elaborate systems of divination and fortune-telling date back to ancient times. Perhaps the most widely known system of early civilization fortune-telling was astrology, where practitioners believed the relative positions of celestial bodies could lend insight into people's lives and even predict their future circumstances. Some fortune-tellers were said to be able to make predictions without the use of these elaborate systems (or in conjunction with them), through some sort of direct apprehension or vision of the future. These people were known as seers or prophets, and in later times as clairvoyants (French word meaning "clear sight" or "clear seeing") and psychics.

Seers formed a functionary role in early civilization, often serving as advisors, priests, and judges. A number of examples are included in biblical accounts. The book of 1 Samuel (Chapter 9) illustrates one such functionary task when Samuel is asked to find the donkeys of the future king Saul. The role of prophet appeared perennially in ancient cultures. In Egypt, the priests of the sun deity Ra at Memphis acted as seers. In ancient Assyria seers were referred to as nabu, meaning "to call" or "announce".

The Delphic Oracle is one of the earliest stories in classical antiquity of prophetic abilities. The Pythia, the priestess presiding over the Oracle of Apollo at Delphi, was believed to be able to deliver prophecies inspired by Apollo during rituals beginning in the 8th century BC. It is often said that the Pythia delivered oracles in a frenzied state induced by vapors rising from the ground, and that she spoke gibberish, believed to be the voice of Apollo, which priests reshaped into the enigmatic prophecies preserved in Greek literature. Other scholars believe records from the time indicate that the Pythia spoke intelligibly, and gave prophecies in her own voice. The Pythia was a position served by a succession of women probably selected from amongst a guild of priestesses of the temple. The last recorded response was given in 393 AD, when the emperor Theodosius I ordered pagan temples to cease operation. Recent geological investigations raise the possibility that ethylene gas caused the Pythia's state of inspiration.

One of the most enduring historical references to what some consider to be psychic ability is the prophecies of Michel de Nostredame (1503–1566), often Latinized to Nostradamus, published during the French Renaissance period. Nostradamus was a French apothecary and seer who wrote collections of prophecies that have since become famous worldwide and have rarely been out of print since his death. He is best known for his book Les Propheties, the first edition of which appeared in 1555. Taken together, his written works are known to have contained at least 6,338 quatrains or prophecies, as well as at least eleven annual calendars. Most of the quatrains deal with disasters, such as plagues, earthquakes, wars, floods, invasions, murders, droughts, and battles – all undated.

Nostradamus is a controversial figure. His many enthusiasts, as well as the popular press, credit him with predicting many major world events. Interest in his work is still considerable, especially in the media and in popular culture. By contrast, most academic scholars maintain that the associations made between world events and Nostradamus' quatrains are largely the result of misinterpretations or mistranslations (sometimes deliberate) or else are so tenuous as to render them useless as evidence of any genuine predictive power.

Englishwoman Mother Shipton demonstrated psychic abilities from her youth and foresaw historical events in the 16th century. In addition to the belief that some historical figures were endowed with a predisposition to psychic experiences, some psychic abilities were thought to be available to everyone on occasion. For example, the belief in prophetic dreams was common and persistent in many ancient cultures.

Nineteenth-century progression

Edgar Cayce (1877–1945) was a psychic of the 20th century and made many highly publicized predictions.

In the mid-nineteenth century, Modern Spiritualism became prominent in the United States and the United Kingdom. The movement's distinguishing feature was the belief that the spirits of the dead could be contacted by mediums to lend insight to the living. The movement was fueled in part by anecdotes of psychic powers. One such person believed to have extraordinary abilities was Daniel Dunglas Home, who gained fame during the Victorian period for his reported ability to levitate to various heights and speak to the dead.

As the Spiritualist movement grew, other comparable groups arose, including the Theosophical Society, which was co-founded in 1875 by Helena Blavatsky (1831–1891). Theosophy coupled spiritualist elements with Eastern mysticism and was influential in the early 20th century, later influencing the New Age movement during the 1970s. Blavatsky herself claimed numerous psychic powers.

Late twentieth century

By the late twentieth century, psychics were commonly associated with New Age culture. Psychic readings and advertising for psychics were common from the 1960s on, as readings were offered for a fee and given in settings such as over the phone, in a home, or at psychic fairs.

Popular culture

Belief in psychic abilities

In a 1990 survey of members of the National Academy of Sciences, only 2% of the respondents thought that extrasensory perception had been scientifically demonstrated, with another 2% thinking that the phenomena happened sometimes. Asked about research in the field, 22% thought that it should be discouraged, 63% that it should be allowed but not encouraged, and 10% that it should be encouraged; neuroscientists were the most hostile to parapsychology of all the specialties.

A survey of the beliefs of the general United States population about paranormal topics was conducted by The Gallup Organization in 2005. The survey found that 41 percent of those polled believed in extrasensory perception and 26 percent believed in clairvoyance. 31 percent of those surveyed indicated that they believe in telepathy or psychic communication.

A poll of 439 college students conducted in 2006 by researchers Bryan Farha of Oklahoma City University and Gary Steward of University of Central Oklahoma, suggested that college seniors and graduate students were more likely to believe in psychic phenomena than college freshmen. Twenty-three percent of college freshmen expressed a belief in paranormal ideas. The percentage was greater among college seniors (31%) and graduate students (34%). The poll showed lower belief in psychic phenomena among science students than social science and education students.

Some people also believe that anyone can have psychic abilities which can be activated or enhanced through the study and practice of various disciplines and techniques such as meditation and divination, with a number of books and websites being dedicated to instruction in these methods. Another popular belief is that psychic ability is hereditary, with a psychic parent passing their abilities on to their children.

Science fiction

This section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (September 2017) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Psychic abilities are common in science fiction, often under the term "psionics". They may be depicted as innate and heritable, as in Alfred Bester's The Demolished Man, A. E. van Vogt's Slan, Anne McCaffrey's Talents universe series or setting, and the television series Babylon 5. Another recurring trope is the conveyance of psychic power through psychoactive drugs, as in the Dune novels and indirectly in the Scanners films, as well as the ghosts in the StarCraft franchise. Somewhat differently, in Madeleine L'Engle's A Wind in the Door and Robert A. Heinlein's Stranger in a Strange Land, psychic abilities may be achieved by any human who learns the proper mental discipline, known as kything in the former work. Popular movies include The Initiation of Sarah. Psychic characters are also common in superhero comics, for instance Jean Grey, Professor X and Emma Frost as well as many others from the Marvel Comics' X-Men. More characters include the characters Raven Baxter and Booker Baxter from the Disney Channel Original Series That's So Raven and its spin-off Raven's Home. The Disney Channel Original Series American Dragon: Jake Long features recurring characters Cara and Sara, who are twin psychics claimed to be the descendants of the Oracle of Delphi, their visions also contrast their personalities (Cara is a Goth that sees only positive visions, while Sara is always in a good mood despite only seeing negative visions).

Criticism and research

Participant of a Ganzfeld Experiment whose results have been criticized as being misinterpreted as evidence for telepathy

Parapsychological research has attempted to use random number generators to test for psychokinesis, mild sensory deprivation in the Ganzfeld experiment to test for extrasensory perception, and research trials conducted under contract by the U.S. government to investigate remote viewing. Critics such as Ed J. Gracely say that this evidence is not sufficient for acceptance, partly because the intrinsic probability of psychic phenomena is very small.

Critics such as Ray Hyman and the National Science Foundation suggest that parapsychology has methodological flaws that can explain the experimental results that parapsychologists attribute to paranormal explanations, and various critics have classed the field as pseudoscience. This has largely been due to a lack of replication of results by independent experimenters.

The evidence presented for psychic phenomena is not sufficiently verified for scientific acceptance, and there exist many non-paranormal alternative explanations for claimed instances of psychic events. Parapsychologists, who generally believe that there is some evidence for psychic ability, disagree with critics who believe that no psychic ability exists and that many of the instances of more popular psychic phenomena such as mediumism, can be attributed to non-paranormal techniques such as cold reading, hot reading, or even self-delusion. Cold reading techniques would include psychics using flattery, intentionally making descriptions, statements or predictions about a person vague and ambiguous, and surreptitiously moving on to another prediction when the psychic deems the audience to be non-responsive. Magicians such as James Randi, Ian Rowland and Derren Brown have demonstrated techniques and results similar to those of popular psychics, but they present physical and psychological explanations as opposed to paranormal ones.

In January 2008 the results of a study using neuroimaging were published. To provide what are purported to be the most favorable experimental conditions, the study included appropriate emotional stimuli and had participants who are biologically or emotionally related, such as twins. The experiment was designed to produce positive results if telepathy, clairvoyance or precognition occurred, but despite this, no distinguishable neuronal responses were found between psychic stimuli and non-psychic stimuli, while variations in the same stimuli showed anticipated effects on patterns of brain activation. The researchers concluded that "These findings are the strongest evidence yet obtained against the existence of paranormal mental phenomena." James Alcock had cautioned the researchers against the wording of said statement.

A detailed study of Sylvia Browne predictions about missing persons and murder cases found that despite her repeated claims to be more than 85% correct, "Browne has not even been mostly correct in a single case". Concerning the television psychics, James Underdown states that testing psychics in a studio setting is difficult as there are too many areas to control: the psychic could be getting help from anyone on the set. The editor controls everything; they can make a psychic look superior or ridiculous depending on direction from the producer. In an Independent Investigations Group exposé of John Edward and James Van Praagh they discovered that what was actually said on the tape day, and what was broadcast to the public were "substantially different in the accuracy. They're getting rid of the wrong guesses... Once you pull back the curtain and see how it's done, it's not impressive at all."

Richard Saunders, Chief Investigator for the Australian Skeptics, and producer and presenter of The Skeptic Zone podcast sought to answer the question “Can self-proclaimed psychics predict unlikely future events with any greater accuracy than chance?” To answer that question he launched "The Great Australian Psychic Prediction Project". Over the course of 12 years, Saunders and then Saunders and his international team of skeptics - Michelle Bijkersma, Kelly Burke, Susan Gerbic, Adrienne Hill, Louis Hillman, Wendy Hughes, Paula Lauterbach, Dr. Angie Mattke, Rob Palmer, and Leonard Tramiel - searched through Australian published media for individuals making psychic or otherwise paranormal predictions.

The goal of the Great Australian Psychic Prediction Project was to collect and then vet the accuracy of every published psychic prediction in Australia since the year 2000. The team analyzed over 3800 predictions made by 207 psychics over the years 2000 to 2020. While a few of the psychic predictions were about events outside of Australia, the predictions primarily focused on celebrities, scandals, natural disasters, weather patterns, sports, and real estate trends.

The results of the analysis of the predictions found that psychics were correct 11% of the time, wrong 35% of the time, and that some predictions were too vague to characterize (19%) or the predicted outcome was so obvious it was to be expected (15%). Two percent of the predictions were unable to be categorized.

The main conclusions of the Great Australian Psychic Prediction Project were:
“Psychics are appallingly bad at predicting future events.”
“Most predictions were too vague, expected, or simply wrong.”
“Most of what happens is not predicted, and most of what is predicted does not happen.”

The Project confirmed that even when considering the margin of error, it is difficult to come to any other conclusion except that people who claim to see into the future cannot do so with a rate of success better than that of educated guesswork, chance, or luck.

Psychic fraud

In an article reported by Pat Foran in CTV News-Toronto, an Ontario woman, known as Marie Jean, depressed after having to sell her home, began seeing a psychic who went by the name of Maha Dev. Marie Jean reported that Dev claimed she was surrounded by "evil spirits" and that "(her) life could be in danger and (her) sons could lose their lives." The initial payment requested was $10,000 to remove the spirits, but in subsequent visits Dev indicated that the spirits were "too strong" and more money was needed. In total, the woman paid $46,000 before deciding she had been "duped." After Marie Jean reported the incident to CTV News, CTV News contacted the psychic. While Dev did not admit to knowing the woman, the money was refunded in full the next day.

Falling for a psychic scam can result in a loss of one's entire life savings. In an example given in an article by Rob Palmer a woman gave a psychic $41,642 over a period of 10 weeks. The woman had contacted Palmer for help, who put her in contact with Bob Nygaard, a private investigator who specializes in psychic fraud cases. Palmer had previously written articles about Nygaard and the work he was doing.

It is apparently difficult to get cases of psychic fraud prosecuted as a crime. Palmer states "when someone reports to law enforcement that they are a victim of this type of fraud, they are often turned away and told it is a civil matter." Palmer goes on to discuss Thomas John and other famous "psychics" who were proven to be frauds. Investigator Ben Radford states that "scammers use various psychological principles to ensnare their prey". Their state of mind, belief in psychic abilities, unhappiness with something happening in their lives and looking for answers. The psychic will instruct the client not to tell their friends or family as they know they may be warned away from the psychic.

With curse removal, the psychic may say that the magic will not work or get worse if they do tell anyone about their involvement with the psychic. The con games from psychics, according to Radford, can "play out over the course of weeks, months, or even years." The psychic is playing the long game and looking to extract as much money as possible. Radford claims that when a victim realizes they have been scammed, often they are too embarrassed to come forward.

Skeptical activist Susan Gerbic has summarized a number of techniques, which she says are used by psychics to create their effects.

See also

Notes

  1. The word "psychic" is also used as an adjective to describe such abilities.

References

  1. Matthew Nisbet (May–June 1998). "Psychic telephone networks profit on yearning, gullibility". Skeptical Inquirer.
  2. "FTC Charges "Miss Cleo" with Deceptive Advertising, Billing and Collection Practices". FTC. February 14, 2002. Archived from the original on August 28, 2008. Retrieved October 6, 2008.
  3. James Randi (1982). Flim-Flam! Psychics, ESP, Unicorns, and Other Delusions. Prometheus Books. pp. 173–195. ISBN 978-0-87975-198-2.
  4. ^ Gracely, Ph.D., Ed J. (1998). "Why Extraordinary Claims Demand Extraordinary Proof". PhACT. Archived from the original on 2013-01-15. Retrieved 2007-07-31.
  5. "Psychic Debunking". NOVA. Season 19. Episode 3. April 15, 1993. PBS.
  6. "She Told Them Boy was Dead. Crystal Ball Fails Psychic in MO. Kidnap". NY Daily News. New York. January 18, 2007. Archived from the original on 2008-12-07. Retrieved 2008-10-07.
  7. Shari Waxman (June 13, 2002). "Shooting crap:Alleged psychic John Edward actually gambles on hope and basic laws of statistics". Salon.com. Archived from the original on June 7, 2011.
  8. Druckman, D.; Swets, J. A., eds. (1988). Enhancing Human Performance: Issues, Theories and Techniques. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C. p. 22. ISBN 978-0-309-07465-0.
  9. Ritchie SJ, Wiseman R, French CC (2012). "Failing the future: three unsuccessful attempts to replicate Bem's 'retroactive facilitation of recall' effect". PLOS ONE. 7 (3): e33423. Bibcode:2012PLoSO...733423R. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0033423. PMC 3303812. PMID 22432019.
  10. Henry George Liddell; Robert Scott, A Greek-English Lexicon, entry for psyche Archived 2021-10-23 at the Wayback Machine
  11. ^ Melton, J.G. (1996). "Psychics". Encyclopedia of Occultism & Parapsychology. Thomson Gale. ISBN 978-0-8103-9487-2.
  12. "1 Samuel 9 / Hebrew - English Bible / Mechon-Mamre". www.mechon-mamre.org. Archived from the original on 2021-12-23. Retrieved 2021-12-23.
  13. Morgan 1990, p. 148.
    • Fontenrose, Joseph (1978). The Delphic Oracle: Its Responses and Operations. pp. 196–227.
    • Maurizio, Lisa. "The Voice at the Centre of the World: The Pythia's Ambiguity and Authority". {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help) (in Lardinois, Andre; McClure, Laura (2001). Making Silence Speak: Women's Voices in Greek Literature and Society. Princeton University Press. pp. 38–54.)
  14. *Spiller, Henry A.; Hale, John R.; de Boer, Jelle Z. (2000). "The Delphic Oracle: A Multidisciplinary Defense of the Gaseous Vent Theory". Clinical Toxicology. 40 (2): 189–196. doi:10.1081/CLT-120004410. PMID 12126193. S2CID 38994427.
  15. Chevignard, Bernard (1999). Présages de Nostradamus.
  16. Lemesurier, Peter (2003). The Unknown Nostradamus.
  17. Porche, J.; Vaughan, D. (2005). Psychics and Mediums in Canada. Dundurn Press. p. 31. ISBN 978-1-77070-167-0. Archived from the original on 2023-05-30. Retrieved 2023-05-30.
  18. Melton, J. G. (1996). Dreams. In Encyclopedia of Occultism & Parapsychology. Thomson Gale. ISBN 978-0-8103-9487-2.
  19. Carroll, Bret E. (1997). Spiritualism in Antebellum America. Indiana University Press. ISBN 978-0-253-33315-5.
  20. Podmore, Frank (1997). Mediums of the Nineteenth Century. University Books. ISBN 978-0-253-33315-5.
  21. Melton. Chapter "Theosophical Society"
  22. Diane Daniel What's in the cards Just how well do the seers see? Archived 2011-09-27 at the Wayback Machine The Boston Globe (Calendar cover story cache 1999)
  23. Wendy Haskett Psychic Fairs Aim for Aura of Fun in Mind Reading LATimes.com, August 15, 1987
  24. McConnell, R.A., and Clark, T.K. (1991). "National Academy of Sciences' Opinion on Parapsychology" Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research, 85, 333–365.
  25. Douglas M. Stokes, Research in Parapsychology, 1990: Abstracts and Papers from the Thirty-Third Annual Convention of the Parapsychological Association, Journal of Parapsychology, Sept, 1992, Retrieved July 4, 2009
  26. David W. Moore (June 16, 2005). "Three in Four Americans Believe in Paranormal". Gallup News Service. Archived from the original on 2017-09-19. Retrieved 2008-10-08.
    Gallup poll shows that Americans' belief in the paranormal persists, Skeptical Inquirer, accessed October 28, 2006
  27. "Paranormal Belief Poll". www.allthingspsychic.com. Archived from the original on 2021-12-23. Retrieved 2021-12-23.
  28. Britt, R.: "Higher Education Fuels Stronger Belief in Ghosts" Archived 2007-07-14 at the Wayback Machine LiveScience, January 2006, Retrieved September 18, 2007.
  29. Chauran, Alexandra (2012). So You Want To Be a Psychic Intuitive. Llewellyn Worldwide. ISBN 978-0738730653.
  30. "Psychics – myths & misconceptions". Archived from the original on April 16, 2007. Retrieved April 25, 2007.
  31. "Science and Engineering Indicators 2006". National Science Board. 2006. Archived from the original on 2015-08-18. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  32. Hyman, Ray (1995). "Evaluation of the program on anomalous mental phenomena". The Journal of Parapsychology. 59 (1). Archived from the original on 2012-07-09. Retrieved 2007-07-30.
  33. Akers, C. (1986). "Methodological Criticisms of Parapsychology, Advances in Parapsychological Research 4". PesquisaPSI. Archived from the original on 2007-09-27. Retrieved 2007-07-30. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  34. Child, I.L. (1987). "Criticism in Experimental Parapsychology, Advances in Parapsychological Research 5". PesquisaPSI. Archived from the original on 2007-09-27. Retrieved 2007-07-30. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  35. Wiseman, Richard; Smith, Matthew; et al. (1996). "Exploring possible sender-to-experimenter acoustic leakage in the PRL autoganzfeld experiments – Psychophysical Research Laboratories". The Journal of Parapsychology. Archived from the original on 2012-07-09. Retrieved 2007-07-30.
  36. EBauer, berhard (1984) "Criticism and Controversy in Parapsychology – An Overview Archived 2007-06-21 at the Wayback Machine", Department of Psychology, University of Freiburg, European Journal of Parapsychology, 5, 141–166 (2007-02-09)
  37. O'Keeffe, Ciarán and Wiseman Richard (2005) "Testing alleged mediumship: Methods and results Archived 2007-02-07 at the Wayback Machine", British Journal of Psychology, 96, 165–17
  38. Wiseman, Richard (2011). Paranormality. pp. 36–38.
  39. Moulton ST, Kosslyn SM (January 2008). "Using neuroimaging to resolve the psi debate" (PDF). Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 20 (1): 182–92. doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.20.1.182. PMID 18095790. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2017-08-12. Retrieved 2017-11-01.
  40. Science contradicts Psi, Skeptical Inquirer, July/August 2008
  41. Shafer, R; Jadwiszczok, A. (2010). "Psychic defective: Sylvia Browne's history of failure". Skeptical Inquirer. 34 (2): 38–42. Archived from the original on 2012-12-23. Retrieved 2010-05-13.
  42. "Putting Psychics to the Test". Chicago Tribune. 2011-09-21. Archived from the original on 2012-10-07. Retrieved 2011-09-12.
  43. ^ Palmer, Rob (March–April 2022). "The Great Australian Psychic Prediction Project: Pondering the Published Predictions of Prominent Psychics". Skeptical Inquirer. Archived from the original on 1 February 2023. Retrieved 29 January 2023.
  44. ^ Saunders, Richard. "The Great Australian Psychic Prediction Project" (PDF). The Skeptic. Archived (PDF) from the original on 6 January 2023. Retrieved 29 January 2023.
  45. Foran, Pat. "'I feel used': Ont. woman hands over nearly $50K to psychic who promised to cleanse her of evil spirits". CTV News. CTV News. Archived from the original on 21 June 2024. Retrieved 29 June 2024.
  46. ^ Palmer, Rob. "Belief in Psychics: What's the Harm and Who's to Blame?". Skeptical Inquirer. Archived from the original on 17 November 2022. Retrieved 17 November 2022.
  47. Palmer, Rob. "Introducing Psychic-Busting Private Eye Bob Nygaard (Part 1)". Skeptical Inquirer. Archived from the original on 2018-08-23. Retrieved 2022-11-18.
  48. Palmer, Rob. "Introducing Psychic-Busting Private Eye Bob Nygaard (Part 2)". Skeptical Inquirer. Archived from the original on 2022-11-18. Retrieved 2022-11-18.
  49. Radford, Ben (2017). "Psychic Arrested in Exorcism Scam". Skeptical Inquirer. 41 (1). Committee for Skeptical Inquirer: 12–13.
  50. Gerbic, Susan (23 March 2018). "Ten Tricks of the Psychics I Bet You Didn't Know". CSI. Committee for Skeptical Inquiry. Archived from the original on 24 March 2018. Retrieved 23 March 2018.

External links

Media related to Psychics at Wikimedia Commons

Parapsychology
Outline
Topics
Active organizations
Defunct organizations
People
Publications
Categories: