Revision as of 15:59, 26 January 2019 editResnjari (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users27,461 edits →3rr: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 18:16, 19 June 2019 edit undoDrmies (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators406,514 edits Notification: nomination of Bioinvent at articles for deletion. (TW) | ||
(12 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== edit warring == | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to ] with others, to avoid editing ], and to ], rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
Points to note: | |||
<blockquote>Article lacks proper secondary sourcing; nothing in here makes it somehow automatically notable.</blockquote> | |||
# '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;''' | |||
# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' | |||
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases, it may be appropriate to ]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be ] from editing.'''<!-- Template:uw-ew -->] (]) 15:45, 26 January 2019 (UTC) | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
== 3rr == | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
] Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an ]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 01:10, 19 June 2019 (UTC) | |||
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr -->] (]) 15:59, 26 January 2019 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> ] (]) 18:16, 19 June 2019 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 18:16, 19 June 2019
Proposed deletion of Bioinvent
The article Bioinvent has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Article lacks proper secondary sourcing; nothing in here makes it somehow automatically notable.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Drmies (talk) 01:10, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Bioinvent for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bioinvent is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Bioinvent until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 18:16, 19 June 2019 (UTC)