Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring: Difference between revisions

< Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 09:53, 27 January 2019 view sourceCharlesdrakew (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers52,316 edits Adding new report for Jimka1. (TW)← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 23:13, 17 January 2025 view source AlexBachmann (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users2,225 edits →User: reported by User:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}} (Result: ): new section
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{Short description\|Noticeboard for edit warring}}
	<!--Adds protection template automatically if semi-protected--><noinclude>{{#if:{{PROTECTIONLEVEL:edit}}\|{{pp\|small=yes}}}}</noinclude>__NEWSECTIONLINK__{{no admin backlog}}{{/Header}}] ]
			{{pp-sock\|small=yes}}
			<!--Adds protection template automatically if semi-protected--><noinclude>{{#if:{{PROTECTIONLEVEL:edit}}\|{{pp\|small=yes}}}}__NEWSECTIONLINK__{{no admin backlog}}{{/Header}}] ]
			{{pp-move\|small=yes}}
	{{User:MiszaBot/config		{{User:MiszaBot/config
	\|archiveheader = {{Administrators' noticeboard navbox all}}		\|archiveheader = {{Administrators' noticeboard navbox all}}
	\|maxarchivesize = 250K		\|maxarchivesize = 250K
	\|counter = ~~383~~		\|counter = 491
	\|algo = old(~~48h~~)		\|algo = old(2d)
	\|key = 0a3bba89e703569428f2aab1add75bd7d7d1583d2d1f397783aee23fda62b06f		\|key = 0a3bba89e703569428f2aab1add75bd7d7d1583d2d1f397783aee23fda62b06f
	\|archive = Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive%(counter)d		\|archive = Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive%(counter)d
			}}</noinclude>
	}}</noinclude><!--<?xml version="1.0"?><api><query><pages><page pageid=" ns="4" title="Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring"><revisions><rev>=Reports=>
			<!-- NOTE: THE BOTTOM IS THE PLACE FOR NEW REPORTS. -->

	NOTE: THE BOTTOM IS THE PLACE FOR NEW REPORTS. -->
	== ] reported by ] (Result: blocked) ==

			== ] reported by ] (Result: Page protected) ==
	'''Page:''' {{pagelinks\|Peter Lemongello}} and {{pagelinks\|The Crests}}<br />
	'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks\|Plemongello}}

			'''Page:''' {{pagelinks\|Fadlo R. Khuri}} <br />
	'''Previous version reverted to:'''
			'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks\|94.187.8.87}}

			'''Previous version reverted to:'''
	'''Diffs of the user's reverts on ]:'''
	#
	#
	#
	#
	#

			'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
	'''Previous version reverted to:'''
			#
			#
			#
			#
			#
			#

	'''~~Diffs~~ of ~~the~~ ~~user's~~ ~~reverts~~ on ]~~:'''~~		'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' ]
	#
	#
	#
	#
	#

	'''Diff of ~~edit~~ ~~warring~~ / ~~3RR~~ ~~warning~~:'''		'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''

	'''Diff of ~~attempt~~ to ~~resolve~~ ~~dispute~~ ~~on article~~ talk page:'''		'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:'''

	<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br />		<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br />
			This is a straight-forward case of edit warring by an unregistered editor (using multiple accounts). This material was also the subject an edit war in 2022. There may be genuine ] concerns but edit warring without participating in the Talk page section specifically opened to discuss this material is not acceptable. ] (]) 12:06, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
			:{{AN3\|p\|three days}} by {{u\|Randykitty}} ] (]) 22:47, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

			== ] reported by ] (Result: Page protected) ==
	A COI warning was given as well as requests to use the talk page to request edits and as well as comments in edit summaries <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </small>
	:Blocked both this user and IP 68.169.210.168 for 24 hours for 3RR violation — Martin <small>(] · ])</small> 23:31, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
	::Follow-up: ] has just had their account renamed to ]. That editor ] that he is not the subject of the article (Peter Lemongello) but is just a fan. ] (]) 18:24, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
	::: The editor, now named BillyB1950, has again broken the ] on ], re-adding the same content which has been disputed and reverted by three other editors. ] (]) 07:14, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

			'''Page:''' {{pagelinks\|Bulgaria–North Macedonia relations}}
	== ] reported by ] (Result: blocked) ==

			'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks\|46.217.186.173}}
	;Page: {{pagelinks\|Safavid dynasty family tree}}
	;User being reported: {{userlinks\|Pikermerle}}

	;Previous version reverted to:		'''Previous version reverted to:'''

	;Diffs of the user's reverts:		'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
			# {{diff2\|1269599524\|13:03, 15 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"
	# {{diff2\|880002250\|18:51, 24 January 2019 (UTC)}} "why are you deleting sourced content that I have taken the time to write? I don't understand the hostility"
			# {{diff2\|1269595946\|12:38, 15 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"
	# {{diff2\|880001518\|18:47, 24 January 2019 (UTC)}} ""
			# {{diff2\|1269506198\|01:10, 15 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"
	# {{diff2\|879999295\|18:34, 24 January 2019 (UTC)}} "well, the long standing content is based on early 20th century "academia" and was disproven by modern day researchers"
			# {{diff2\|1269480789\|22:21, 14 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"
	# {{diff2\|879998817\|18:31, 24 January 2019 (UTC)}} "Everything that I've said is sourced. You have a problem with it, you take it to the talk page"
			# {{diff2\|1269469278\|21:11, 14 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (]) FASISM TOWARDS MACEDONIA"

	;Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:		'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
	# {{diff2\|~~879998790~~\|18:31, 24 January ~~2019~~ (UTC)}} "~~Caution~~: ~~Unconstructive~~ ~~editing.~~ (])"		# {{diff2\|1269596351\|12:41, 15 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Warning: Edit warring on ]."
	# {{diff2\|880002555\|18:53, 24 January 2019 (UTC)}} "Warning: Three-revert rule. (])"

	;Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:		'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''


			<u>'''Comments:'''</u> Persistent edit warring. ] (]) 13:08, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
	;<u>Comments:</u>
			*{{AN3\|p}} ] ] 20:23, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

			== ] reported by ] (Result: Blocked from article for 72 hours) ==
	"Brand new" account (created ), trying to change long-standing well sourced content on numerous articles through sheer edit-warring. Even though I and others ({{ping\|HistoryofIran}}) have requested him, on numerous occassions, to refer to the talk page (per ] and ]]), he does not care at all. Looking at the evidence, in combination with the fact that he ''instantly'' removed the 3RR warning from his talk page, I think its safe to say that this account is here on a ] ]. - ] (]) 18:58, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
	:Your absolute first interaction with me consisted in deleting everything that I've written, dismissing it as "historical revisionism" (despite me actually attempting to correct early twentieth-century historical revisionism with modern-day research) and attacking me for being a new user. I only deleted the "warnings" that you posted on my talk page, because you deleted those that I put on yours. I am here to complement outdated and disproven content with new, academically-backed material. Please try to be civil, and don't be of bad faith. ] (]) 19:06, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
	::It appears that Pikermerle has already broken ] at ]. Their version of the article always includes the unqualified claim that 'the Safavids were ]', while the prior version used more cautious language. They have now made this replacement five times, which gives them a total of four reverts. They may be able to avoid a block if they will agree to wait for consensus before making any more edits about the Safavids. ] (]) 19:48, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
	:::Unfortunately Pikermerle went on to make a further revert, even after this olive branch. I have blocked for 24 hours. — Martin <small>(] · ])</small> 22:54, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
	::::What "further revert" and which "olive branch" are you referring to? I stopped editing these articles the moment I received a warning about the 3rd revert rule. The fact that you would block me after I stopped editing the articles and moved the discussion to the talk page is either a stupid mistake or highly ill-intentioned. ] (]) 23:32, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

			'''Page:''' {{pagelinks\|Russo-Turkish War (1735–1739)}}
	== ] reported by ] (Result: blocked) ==

			'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks\|Asafviki}}
	;Page: {{pagelinks\|Venezuela}}
	;User being reported: {{userlinks\|Gutterball1219}}

	;Previous version reverted to:		'''Previous version reverted to:'''

	;Diffs of the user's reverts:		'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
			# {{diff2\|1269613200\|14:40, 15 January 2025 (UTC)}} "I understood you at the beginning but now I think you are doing this unnecessarily. All the sources are reliable and you can take a look if you want.İf you really have a sound reason tell me the truth please."
	# {{diff2\|880078017\|05:36, 25 January 2019 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 880077753 by ] (]) Last edit claimed to fixed grammar, vandalized information instead"
	# {{diff2\|~~880077332~~\|05:28, 25 January ~~2019~~ (UTC)}} "~~Undid~~ ~~revision~~ ~~880077256~~ by ] ~~(])~~"		# {{diff2\|1269609369\|14:13, 15 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Can you please tell me why you reverted my edit?i just want to know where am I doing wrong."
			# {{diff2\|1269569554\|09:06, 15 January 2025 (UTC)}} "I am making my edit since there has been no objection to the mentioned sources for 3 days."
	# {{diff2\|880076335\|05:17, 25 January 2019 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 880076205 by ] (])"
	# {{diff2\|880076175\|05:16, 25 January 2019 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 880076064 by ] (])"
	# {{diff2\|880076026\|05:14, 25 January 2019 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 880075926 by ] (])"
	# {{diff2\|880075854\|05:12, 25 January 2019 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 880075825 by ] (])"
	# {{diff2\|880075777\|05:11, 25 January 2019 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 880075691 by ] (])"
	# {{diff2\|880075658\|05:10, 25 January 2019 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 880075582 by ] (])"
	# {{diff2\|880075518\|05:08, 25 January 2019 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 880075367 by ] (])"

	;Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:		'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
	# {{diff2\|~~880077511~~\|05:30, 25 January ~~2019~~ (UTC)}} "Warning: ~~Disruptive~~ ~~editing~~. ~~(])~~"		# {{diff2\|1269613702\|14:43, 15 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Warning: Edit warring."

	;Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:		'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''

	*]

	;<u>Comments:</u>		<u>'''Comments:'''</u>
	Ongoing talk this editor has not engaged in

			Also LOUT socking with ]. --<span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">]--]</sup> 15:16, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
	;<u>Rebuttal:</u>
	*Ban ~~me,~~ ~~you~~ ~~cowards~~. ] (]) 06:02, 25 January ~~2019~~ (UTC)		:{{AN3\|b\|72 hours}} from article; hopefully in that time someone can explain what they are doing wrong. ] (]) 22:52, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
	*Blocked Gutterball1219 and Knowledgekid87 for clear 3RR violations — Martin <small>(] · ])</small> 08:55, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

	== ] reported by ] (Result: ~~Both~~ ~~blocked~~) ==		== ] reported by ] (Result: Blocked 48 hours) ==

	'''Page:''' {{pagelinks\|~~Ras~~ el ~~hanout~~}} ~~<br />~~		'''Page:''' {{pagelinks\|SmartLynx Airlines Estonia}}
	'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks\|AZSH}}

			'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks\|TG-article}}
	'''Previous version reverted to:'''

			'''Previous version reverted to:'''

	'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''		'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
			# {{diff2\|1269668652\|20:12, 15 January 2025 (UTC)}} "/* Accidents and incidents */"
	# 14 january, 02:40
			# {{diff2\|1269664490\|19:49, 15 January 2025 (UTC)}} "/* Accidents and incidents */"
	# 15 january 01:24
	# 15 january 02:19
	# 15 january 03:01

			'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
	Four reverts within 25 hours 10 days ago, and now :
			# {{diff2\|1269638908\|17:20, 15 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Warning: Three-revert rule on ]."

			'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''
	# 25 january 01:40
	# 26 january 00:19
	# 26 january 01:23
	# 26 january 01:30

	'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' and several other users warned AZSH in recent times :

			<u>'''Comments:'''</u>
	'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' , , , , etc ...

			Also edit warring at ], ], ] and ]. User has been told to discuss edits on talk pages on multiple occasions, and seemingly refuses to do so. ] (]) 20:18, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
	<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br />

			:@] This is not a 3RR violation. I see two reverts. ] ] 20:20, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
	This user edit-warred against another user some 10 days ago (see the above diffs) with 4 reverts within 25 hours, now he's edit-warring against me, with 4 reverts within 24 hours and refuses to give a legit explanation for his removal of sourced content. Moreover, he told me that "''they don't need me''" for the thread, thus refusing to engage in a constructive discussion : . I would welcome the eye of an admin in order to stop the disruption caused by the reported editor. Best regards.<b><span style="color:orange">---Wikaviani </span></b><sup><small><b>] ]</b></small></sup> 02:03, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
			::No it’s not a 3RR violation - but it’s a user that’s consistently edit warring across multiple pages and refusing to engage in talk pages, which is why I believe it still belongs on the edit warring noticeboard.
			::Edit: I’ll get the rest of the diffs here in a sec… I used Twinkle for the original report. ] (]) 20:22, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
			:::* ] - {{diff2\|1269663239\|reversion 1}}, {{diff2\|1269667404\|reversion 2}} (which was following a pertial reinstatement of their already reverted content)
			:::* ] - {{diff2\|1269638888\|partial reinstatement}} of reverted content, followed by {{diff2\|1269666092\|reinstating}} his reverted edit
			:::* ] - {{diff2\|1269664088\|reinstating}} their previously reverted content
			:::* ] - {{diff2\|1269664490\|reinstates}} their reverted edit, then {{diff2\|1269668652\|again partially reinstating}} their reverted edit.
			:::* ] - legitimately and in good faith {{diff2\|1269497042\|alters}} a template, but then after being reverted {{diff2\|1269636269\|doubles down}} and reinstates the edit.
			:::The user has previously been blocked for this exact same behaviour by ], and is nt responding to talk page messages. ] (]) 20:36, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
			::::{{AN3\|b\|48 hours}} ] (]) 22:57, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

			== ] reported by ] (Result: Blocked 24h) ==
	* {{AN3\|bb\|24 hours}} ], ], ] 02:20, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

			'''Page:''' {{pagelinks\|Wolf Man (2025 film)}}
	== ] reported by ] (Result: Protected) ==

			'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks\|190.201.157.28}}
	;Page: {{pagelinks\|Jagdish Tytler}}
	;User being reported: {{userlinks\|103.204.87.39}}

	;Previous version reverted to:		'''Previous version reverted to:'''

	;Diffs of the user's reverts:		'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
	# {{diff2\|~~880232144~~\|05:32, 26 January ~~2019~~ (UTC)}} "~~Restore last good, no BLP vio~~"		# {{diff2\|1269704227\|23:38, 15 January 2025 (UTC)}} ""
			# {{diff2\|1269703995\|23:36, 15 January 2025 (UTC)}} ""
	# {{diff2\|880231113\|05:20, 26 January 2019 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 880230474 by ] (]) notable event relevant to investigation details"
			# {{diff2\|1269673354\|20:42, 15 January 2025 (UTC)}} "/* Reception */"
	# {{diff2\|880226536\|04:28, 26 January 2019 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 880207862 by ] (]) I hear you are tag teaming and has no prior history here but ].."
			# {{diff2\|1269640157\|17:28, 15 January 2025 (UTC)}} ""
	# {{diff2\|880141192\|16:39, 25 January 2019 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 880034627 by ] (]) no consensus for this"
	# {{diff2\|879978253\|16:13, 24 January 2019 (UTC)}} "remove undue information per talk page, a CBI statement needs no separate section"

	;Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:		'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
			# {{diff2\|1269704229\|23:38, 15 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Warning: Three-revert rule on ]."

			'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''
	#
			# No, but level 4 warning previously given on editors talk page

			<u>'''Comments:'''</u>
	;Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
			{{AN3\|b\|24 hours}} ] (]) 21:31, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
	# {{diff2\|880040775\|23:18, 24 January 2019 (UTC)}} "/* Undue weightage to the accusations and removal of the subjects statement */ re"

			== ] reported by ] (Result: Page protected for a month) ==
	;<u>Comments:</u>

			'''Page:''' {{pagelinks\|Until Dawn (film)}}
	This IP user is showing ] issues and repeatedly reverting to his of the article. He has thrice removed reliably sourced content citing frivolous reasons and has twice restored ] violations (poorly sourced statements attributed to a living person) ''<span style="text-shadow:0px 0px .3em LightSkyBlue;">]]</span>'' 06:12, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

			'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks\|2607:FEA8:7221:F600:60E4:6CE4:B415:E562}}
	* This IP is clearly a sock of somebody or other, not to mention the clear ] in the diff 3. What do they mean by "{{tq\|I hear}}". Hear from whom? They have no prior interaction with me. (By the way, the subject, ], is in the news. Plenty of people with "no prior history" would be watching this page.) -- ] (]) 13:05, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
	* I also notice that the IP has full protection of the page, repeating the same ridiculous ] naming me, '''and then''' did a revert: {{diff2\|880232144\|05:32, 26 January 2019}}. A clear effort to game the system. -- ] (]) 14:07, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
	* Also It would be interesting to know how this IP and Qualitist reached this page in the first place, immediately after I edited it, and only to revert my edits. (], ], ])--''<span style="text-shadow:0px 0px .3em LightSkyBlue;">]]</span>'' 15:17, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
	::{{AN3\|p}} – 3 days by ]. ] (]) 17:21, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
	:::The IP 103.204.87.39, who has certainly made a lot of reverts, has that may be of interest. ] (]) 17:27, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

			'''Previous version reverted to:'''
	== ] reported by ] (Result: Blocked 24 hours) ==

			'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
	'''Page:''' {{pagelinks\|Emma Sulkowicz}} <br />
			# {{diff2\|1269723705\|01:44, 16 January 2025 (UTC)}} ""
	'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks\|Indygirl15}}
			# {{diff2\|1269722106\|01:34, 16 January 2025 (UTC)}} ""
			# {{diff2\|1269715862\|00:48, 16 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (]) Okay, the vandalism has gone on long enough, you are removing accurate information, and you have engaged in this obsession for days, just accept the information and let it go"
			# {{diff\|oldid=1269684805\|diff=1269714293\|label=Consecutive edits made from 00:39, 16 January 2025 (UTC) to 00:40, 16 January 2025 (UTC)}}
			## {{diff2\|1269714124\|00:39, 16 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (]) Enough with the vandalism already"
			## {{diff2\|1269714293\|00:40, 16 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (]) Stop with the vandalism, its accurate information"

			'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
	'''Previous version reverted to:''' (in a bio of a person who uses "they" pronouns)
			# {{diff2\|1269716711\|00:53, 16 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Caution: Removal of content, blanking on ]."
			# {{diff2\|1269716853\|00:54, 16 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Warning: Three-revert rule on ]."

			'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''
			# {{diff2\|1269719613\|01:15, 16 January 2025 (UTC)}} "/* We edit by consensus */ new section"

			<u>'''Comments:'''</u>
			I was just about to report this IP user here until I noticed you already did it a few mins ago...

			Anyways, the IP user has actually made five reverts not four, here's the fifth (or actually, the first) one: ].

			The report is missing "previous version reverted to:" so here it is: ]

			Regards, — ] ] 03:40, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
			:{{AN3\|p}} for one month by {{noping\|ToBeFree}} ] (]) 21:32, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

			== ] reported by ] (Result: Reporter blocked 2 weeks) ==

			'''Page:''' {{pagelinks\|Kajari}} <br />
			'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks\|Adrikshit}}

			'''Previous version reverted to:'''

	'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''		'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
	#		#
	#		#
	#		#
	#		#

	#

	#

	#

	#
	#		'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''

	# (continued edit warring even after being warned on their talk page by me and by another user)
			'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''

	'''Diff of ~~edit~~ ~~warring~~ / ~~3RR~~ ~~warning~~:''' ~~and~~		'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:'''

	<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br />		<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br />
			{{AN3\|nb\|two weeks}} by {{noping\|ToBeFree}} ] (]) 21:37, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

	~~Clear~~ ~~case~~ of ] ~~(and~~ ~~DIDNTHEARTHAT)?~~ ] (]) 06:12, 26 January ~~2019~~ (UTC)		:I have also added a CTOPS notice to the article talk page. ] (]) 21:38, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
			::And Aman has been alerted to contentious topics, too. ] (]) 21:40, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

			== ] reported by ] (Result:indefinitely partially blocked) ==
	The comment is a clear indication that the editor intends to continue with these edits, as they have. ] (]) 06:15, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
	*{{AN3\|blocked\| 24 hours}} and warned of discretionary sanctions. ] (]) 07:51, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

			'''Page:''' {{pagelinks\|Killing_of_Wong_Chik_Yeok}}
	== ] reported by ] (Result: Blocked per SPI) ==

			'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks\|Janessian}}
	;Page: {{pagelinks\|Jean Wyllys}}
	;User being reported: {{userlinks\|Damonshady}}

	;Previous version reverted to:		'''Previous version reverted to:'''

	;Diffs of the user's reverts:		'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
			# {{diff\|oldid=1269356091\|diff=1269786107\|label=Consecutive edits made from 11:20, 16 January 2025 (UTC) to 11:24, 16 January 2025 (UTC)}}
	# {{diff2\|880266643\|12:19, 26 January 2019 (UTC)}} "Check the talk page"
			## {{diff2\|1269785771\|11:20, 16 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Posting the photo of a deceased tagged to such an intense tragic story would greatly hurt the family. Imagine this is your daughter mug shot, killed by her husband, with her summarised tragic story plastered for the world to see. All I did was to remove her picture and you youngsters spare no effort in reverting it."
	# {{diff2\|880265221\|12:03, 26 January 2019 (UTC)}} "What are you talking about?? And why are you reverting to a version full of typos and outdated information? Nothing new was added so no need for sources!"
			## {{diff2\|1269786107\|11:24, 16 January 2025 (UTC)}} "This man, worked hard his whole life, faithful his entire life, fell ill to a mental illness, does not deserve to have his face tagged to a summarised wrong version of the story for the entire world to see. Imagine this is your brother, who spent his old age in agony. Are you sure this is the right thing to do? What good does it serve to publish pictures of an old case other than to serve what grandiose ideology?"
	# {{diff\|oldid=880260538\|diff=880264910\|label=Consecutive edits made from 11:42, 26 January 2019 (UTC) to 12:00, 26 January 2019 (UTC)}}
	## {{diff2\|880263191\|11:42, 26 January 2019 (UTC)}} "Previous revert was disrespectful to people who spent time making good faith, productive edits. No reason to revert at all!"
	## {{diff2\|880263941\|11:49, 26 January 2019 (UTC)}} "Wording"
	## {{diff2\|880264523\|11:55, 26 January 2019 (UTC)}} "Repositioning // This section still need some work done in order to achieve a neutral point of view"
	## {{diff2\|880264869\|11:59, 26 January 2019 (UTC)}} "/* Controversies */ can someone more experienced fix this section? It gives to much weight to one side and doesn’t have sources"
	## {{diff2\|880264910\|12:00, 26 January 2019 (UTC)}} "/* Controversies */ fixed typo"

	;Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:		'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
	# {{diff2\|880265685\|12:08, 26 January 2019 (UTC)}} "Warning: Three-revert rule on ]. (])"

	;Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

			'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''

	;<u>Comments:</u>

			<u>'''Comments:'''</u>
	Invloved in large dispute with ] - has been reported to SPI by them. ] (]) 12:23, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
	:I refuse any involvement in sockpuppetry and I’m sorry if I violated any rule. I made good faith, productive edits and this guy is reverting me for no reason! Can someone be reasonable and check my contributions? I have no intention at all to disrupt Misplaced Pages. I didn’t add any new information that requires a source. I even tried to get reasonings from him but nevertheless, I’m being accused of using multiple accounts? I’m not even pov pushing, I don’t have any agenda! Just tried to contribute to WP but it seems I’m not welcomed here. Actually I don’t even care about being blocked, I just ask you please to check my edits and decide for yourself if they’re disruptive. --] (]) 12:32, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
	*{{AN3\|ab}} at SPI as a sock. ]<sup>]</sup> 16:52, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

			User appears to be slow edit warring at this point. JBW has already banned them once for edit warring. ] (]) 19:18, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
	==] reported by ] (Result: Page protected) ==

			:I would also point out that before their first ban for edit warring @] was making comments with a seeming intent to intimidate users that reverted his edits. ] (]) 19:20, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
	;Page: {{pagelinks\|Jean Wyllys}}
	;User being reported: {{userlinks\|Coltsfan}}

			:: {{u\|Isabelle Belato}} has indefinitely partially blocked Janessian from the ] article. ] (]) 21:07, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
	;Previous version reverted to:

			== ] reported by ] (Result: Blocked 24 hours from editing articles) ==
	;Diffs of the user's reverts:
	# {{diff2\|880265015\|12:01, 26 January 2019 (UTC)}} "changes made ignoring or extrapolating the sources; ] and ]"
	# {{diff\|oldid=880229587\|diff=880260538\|label=Consecutive edits made from 11:14, 26 January 2019 (UTC) to 11:14, 26 January 2019 (UTC)}}
	## {{diff2\|880260517\|11:14, 26 January 2019 (UTC)}} "non constructive changes that don't agree with the sources or don't have any"
	## {{diff2\|880260538\|11:14, 26 January 2019 (UTC)}} ""
	# {{diff2\|880213956\|02:28, 26 January 2019 (UTC)}} ""

			'''Page:''' {{pagelinks\|Capitalism}} <br />
	;Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
			'''Page:''' {{pagelinks\|Free market}} <br />
	# {{diff2\|880265718\|12:08, 26 January 2019 (UTC)}} "Warning: Three-revert rule on ]. (])"
			'''Page:''' {{pagelinks\|Extreme poverty}} <br />
			'''Page:''' {{pagelinks\|Distribution of wealth}} <br />
			'''Page:''' {{pagelinks\|Poverty reduction}} <br />
			'''Page:''' {{pagelinks\|Trickle-down economics}} <br />

			'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks\|Timeshifter}}
	;Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

			POV pushing: added the EXACT same graph of (historical US minimum wage) to 36 articles and edit-warring to keep it there.

			'''Previous version reverted to:'''
	;<u>Comments:</u>

			'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
	As per my report a moment ago - this is the other user invloved. ] (]) 12:25, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
			#
	:{{ping\|RhinosF1}} Three changes were made by me (only two being me reverting someone, no 3RR here) and then things were taken to the talk page. You even put in the diffs there that were about spacing in the paragraphs, not changes in the content. That's hardly a EW, under any light. ] (]) 12:39, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
			#
	::You seem to be trying to discuss but I've added information on yourself to allow the full case to be seen. ] (]) 12:42, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
			#
	:::{{AN3\|p}} – 5 days. ] (]) 17:46, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
			#




			'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''

			'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''

			'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:'''

			<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br />

			This is an ad hominem attack: "POV pushing: added the EXACT same graph of (historical US minimum wage) to 36 articles and edit-warring to keep it there." I would appreciate if Avatar317 would please stop with the ad hominem attacks in the edit summaries. They violate ].

			I stand by most of my insertions of the chart:
			*]

			I agree with some of Avatar317's removals. Other removals seemed to be stalking to see where I added the chart. The regular editors of articles are capable of making up their own minds.

			I addressed Avatar317's points in my edit summaries. But he sometimes did not address my points in his 2nd reversions.

			I would appreciate not being stalked. And we can always go to the talk page for the articles he regularly edits. --] (]) 23:52, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

			:Every article I reverted you on was on my Watchlist. I did not (yet) go through the list of your edits other than to count them.
			:You've been around long enough that you should know that per ] "The responsibility for achieving consensus for inclusion is on those seeking to include disputed content."; so you COULD have started discussions rather than continuing to push that content into all those articles.
			:Which article did you NOT revert my removal? I don't see even one. ---''']]''' 00:05, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
			::]. And in ] you changed the location which I don't mind.
			::And you '''could''' have addressed my points in your 2nd edit summary instead of doing a kneejerk 2nd reversion in some cases without directly addressing my points. That would save some time before going to the talk page.
			::And please see ] if you are thinking of following me around to the other articles where the chart is posted. --] (]) 00:23, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
			:::All of your "points" are Original Research ] based on your BELIEF that the chart is relevant to the 36 articles you added it to. Again: "The responsibility for achieving consensus for inclusion is on those seeking to include disputed content."
			:::And if you post the same content into many articles, I will revert those which are inappropriate the same way I would go over a new editor's edits who adds spam to many articles. In case you can't tell, I have an interest in Economics, and keeping extraneous content out of Misplaced Pages. Hounding would be following you to articles OTHER than ones I have an interest in. ---''']]''' 01:25, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
			*{{AN3\|b\|24 hours}} from editing articles. ] applies. ] (]) 01:50, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

	== ] reported by ] (Result: ~~indef~~) ==		== ] reported by ] (Result: Blocked one week) ==

	'''Page:''' {{pagelinks\|~~Greta~~ ~~Thunberg~~}} <br />		'''Page:''' {{pagelinks\|Aubrey Plaza}} <br />
	'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks\|~~1Goldberg2~~}}		'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks\|Ibeaa}}

	'''Previous version reverted to:'''		'''Previous version reverted to:'''

	'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''		'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
	* ~~and ] violation in which ed changed ] from saying she's a "climate activist" to a "climate prostitute"~~		#
	* ~~to restore "prositute"~~		#
	* ~~to restore "prositute"~~		#
	* ~~to restore "prositute"~~		#
	* ~~to restore "prositute"~~		#
	* ~~to restore "prositute"~~		#
	* Other vandalism, not 3RR shortly after the last diff above ~~first sentence of the lead at global warming to "Global warming is fake..."~~		#
			#
			#
			#
			#

	'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning''' and '''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page'''</br> </br>
	Due to the vandalism and BLP vio I did not bother issuing a 3RR notice before filing this report. I did, however, leave a . <del>I don't think they have any contribs after I left the DS notice.</del> DONTBITE is great when inexperienced users make oopsies but this case presents abundant objective evidence of bad faith, so I skipped the handholding. After posting the DS alert, this user added an inflammatory comment in this thread (see below, or if it later disappears see ). ] (]) 13:17, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
	*:That was not mistake. I politically attacked this disgusting left for her lies. And there is no global warming--] (]) 13:07, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
	* {{AN3\|b\| indef}} I can't see that as anything but a severe BLP violation and simple vandalism. Blocked until they can return to rationality. ] ] 13:29, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

	== ] reported by ] (Result: Blocked) ==

			'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' ;
	;Page: {{pagelinks\|Accession of Macedonia to NATO}}
	;User being reported: {{userlinks\|Ljuvlig}}

			'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:'''
	;Previous version reverted to:

			<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br />
	;Diffs of the user's reverts:
			Single purpose account dedicated to removing relevant and properly sourced content. Their only excuse is: "''guys im gonna be honest idk why im doing this''". ] (]) 17:19, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
	# {{diff2\|880324164\|20:16, 26 January 2019 (UTC)}} "It's not balanced having two pics saying "fuck", "kill" nato, atleast one pro and one con if a of the photos is gonna be up."
			*{{AN3\|b\|one week}}. ] (]) 17:26, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
	# {{diff2\|880287628\|15:54, 26 January 2019 (UTC)}} "It's no idea to threaten by writing on my talk page, you are changing your story, first you say a majority are against then you say some are, based on what? Nothing, no sources, just cause you feel that Nato isn't good for Macedonia doesn't mean grafiti is acceptable."
			*:Left CTOPS notice on talk page. ] (]) 20:14, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
	# {{diff2\|880286590\|15:43, 26 January 2019 (UTC)}} "Where are the sources that you say are true, that the majority are anti-Nato. The Wiki text says otherwise."
	# {{diff2\|880286067\|15:38, 26 January 2019 (UTC)}} "No they are not, it says a bit further up that "NATO membership in general is supported by 85.2% of the population." This is anti-nato propaganda. And makes the article not neutral."
	# {{diff2\|880285192\|15:30, 26 January 2019 (UTC)}} "Not relevant, graffiti from some random person(s) shouldn't take up the articles points."

			== ] reported by ] (Result: Blocked 72 hours) ==
	;Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
	*
	*

			'''Page:''' {{pagelinks\|Timur}}

			'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks\|Tamerlanon}}
	;Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
	# {{diff2\|880307793\|18:23, 26 January 2019 (UTC)}} "/* Pics in article */Cmt"

			'''Previous version reverted to:'''
	;<u>Comments:</u>
	*Made another revert . ] (]) 20:48, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
	::{{AN3\|b}} – 24 hours. ] (]) 06:42, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

			'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
	== ] reported by ] (Result: ) ==
			# {{diff2\|1270047251\|17:28, 17 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Timur was born in 1336, it is impossible to be in 1320"
			# {{diff2\|1270045995\|17:21, 17 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Timur's Birth Date is 1336 If You Say 1320 Source?"
			# {{diff2\|1270040416\|16:50, 17 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Timur was in his 70s in his last years before his death. It is impossible for him to be over 85 years old."
			# {{diff2\|1269989123\|11:04, 17 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Discussion: He was born in 1320. Give a source?"
			# {{diff2\|1269974575\|09:18, 17 January 2025 (UTC)}} ""
			# {{diff2\|1269974278\|09:16, 17 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Timur was in his 70s in his last years before his death. It is impossible for him to be over 85 years old."
			# {{diff\|oldid=1269967855\|diff=1269969911\|label=Consecutive edits made from 08:24, 17 January 2025 (UTC) to 08:40, 17 January 2025 (UTC)}}
			## {{diff2\|1269968118\|08:24, 17 January 2025 (UTC)}} ""
			## {{diff2\|1269969911\|08:40, 17 January 2025 (UTC)}} ""
			# {{diff2\|1269966433\|08:11, 17 January 2025 (UTC)}} ""

			'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
	;Page: {{pagelinks\|Sofia Airport}}
			# {{diff2\|1269972530\|09:01, 17 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Caution: Unconstructive editing on ]."
	;User being reported: {{userlinks\|Jimka1}}
			# {{diff2\|1269987649\|10:54, 17 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Warning: Edit warring."

			'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''
	;Previous version reverted to:
			# {{diff2\|1269994020\|11:44, 17 January 2025 (UTC)}} "/* Birthdate */ ping"

			<u>'''Comments:'''</u>
	;Diffs of the user's reverts:
			*{{AN3\|b\|72 hours}}. ] (]) 17:46, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
	# {{diff2\|880394823\|05:23, 27 January 2019 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 880325530 by ] (]) )As before, none of you bother to discuss this in the talk page. Please take a time just for once to refer to Garretka (talk) 22:52, 6 December 2018 (UTC). Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Sofia_Airport"
	# {{diff2\|880274848\|13:48, 26 January 2019 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 880262024 by ] (]) Not really cool by threatening user blockage. You had previously said to discuss this in the talk page and none is being involved in this endless and pointless spam theory. Go along and block, at least the other users are aware of this bizarre meddling."
	# {{diff2\|880144399\|17:03, 25 January 2019 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 880120104 by ] (]) In the talk page, a professional pilot has given both yourself and your lad suggestions but you passively chose to ignore. Instead of passively undoing articles, give us examples. References have been borrowed from other nearby airports."

	~~;Diffs of edit~~ warring ~~/ 3RR~~ ~~warning:~~		== Edit-warring IP ==
	# {{diff2\|880262174\|11:32, 26 January 2019 (UTC)}} "/* Edit warring */ new section"

			The IP has been deleting sourced information in the article of ] </nowiki>] </nowiki>] </nowiki>] </nowiki>] </nowiki>] since 1st of January and edit-warring on the article of ] </nowiki>] </nowiki>] </nowiki>] and ] </nowiki>] </nowiki>] </nowiki>]. It appears that the user wants to have everything "Albanian" removed.
	;Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
			They also removed "Albanian" from the article of ] and replaced it with Serbian. </nowiki>] As I can't notify IPs about ongoing discussions, I will leave it like that. It appears that the user possesses no will for encyclopedic cooperation. ] (]) 19:51, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

			:{{AN3\|m}} ] (]) 20:07, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
			::It's an IP that has no will for encyclopedic cooperation. Since when do we need to open discussions with them? I've seen admins blocking IPs by other users just notifying them on their talkpage. And I did provide diffs. ] (]) 20:13, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
			:::I know it seems bureaucratic, but we have that form for ''a reason''. It makes it much easier to review these reports. It shouldn't take you too much time to re-enter it properly. ] (]) 20:17, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
			::::And by the way, you ''can'' notify the IP about this; they ''do'' have ]. It seems from the history that although they recently blanked it (which ]), others have used it in the past to notify them of things like ... reports here. ] (]) 20:24, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

			{{subst:AN3 report\|diffs=# {{diff2\|1270072743\|19:50, 17 January 2025 (UTC)}} ""
	;<u>Comments:</u>
			# {{diff\|oldid=1270003652\|diff=1270044450\|label=Consecutive edits made from 17:06, 17 January 2025 (UTC) to 17:13, 17 January 2025 (UTC)}}
			## {{diff2\|1270043159\|17:06, 17 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] ([[User talk Sorry, but they don't stand up historically.To claim that stout is a strong version of mild ale is just embarrassing!"
			## {{diff2\|1270044450\|17:13, 17 January 2025 (UTC)}} ""
			# {{diff2\|1270000487\|12:34, 17 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (]) Irrelevant unless it's properly sourced"
			# {{diff\|oldid=1263595504\|diff=1269993652\|label=Consecutive edits made from 11:39, 17 January 2025 (UTC) to 11:41, 17 January 2025 (UTC)}}
			## {{diff2\|1269993388\|11:39, 17 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Stout has never been a type of ale, weak sourcing too."
			## {{diff2\|1269993652\|11:41, 17 January 2025 (UTC)}} "/* Oatmeal stout */Not notable"\|warnings=\|resolves=
			# {{diff2\|1270073178\|19:53, 17 January 2025 (UTC) on User talk:Haldraper}} "Warning: Edit warring on ]."\|pagename=Stout\|orig=\|comment=See also the reverts at ]. Haldraper has crossed the 3RR in both cases. ]. ] 22:43, 17 January 2025 (UTC)\|uid=Haldraper}}

			== ] reported by ] (Result: ) ==

			'''Page:''' {{pagelinks\|Christianity in Kosovo}}, {{pagelinks\|Astius}}, {{pagelinks\|John Koukouzelis}}, {{pagelinks\|Angelina of Serbia}} <br />
			'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks\|187.36.171.230}}

			'''Previous version reverted to:''' Christianity in Kosovo: , Astius: , John Koukouzelis:

			'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
			# </nowiki>] </nowiki>] </nowiki>] </nowiki>] </nowiki>]
			# </nowiki>] </nowiki>] </nowiki>]
			# </nowiki>] </nowiki>] </nowiki>]
			# </nowiki>]



			'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' -

			'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' -, but

			'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:'''

			<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br />

	~~Three~~ ~~reverts~~ ~~today~~ ~~and~~ ~~many~~ ~~more~~ in ~~previous~~ ~~days~~ ~~including~~ ~~four~~ on ~~one~~ ~~day~~. ~~Persistent~~ ~~spammer~~ and ~~original~~ ~~researcher~~. ] (]) 09:53, 27 January ~~2019~~ (UTC)		It seems like the user indeed adds suitable content for content that relates to Serbia. Therefore, a topic ban for Kosovo and Albania would be convenient. I don't know if that's possible here, though. ] (]) 23:13, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 23:13, 17 January 2025

Noticeboard for edit warring

v t e Noticeboards
Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes.
General	Administrators Main Incidents Bots Bureaucrats Centralized discussion Closure requests Education Interface admins Main Page errors Open proxies VRT Oversight User permissions
Articles, content	Biographies of living persons Copyrights Questions on media Problems Dispute resolution External links Fringe theories Neutral point of view Original research Pending changes Reliable sources Resource requests Scalable vector graphics Spam Blacklist Whitelist Style Titleblacklist Translation
Page handling	History merges Mergers Splits Moves Protection Importation XfD Articles Redirects Categories Templates Files Miscellany Undeletion
User conduct	Conflict of interest Contributor copyright Edit warring and 3RR Sanctions Personal restrictions General sanctions Contentious topics Sockpuppets Usernames (Requests for comment) Vandalism
Other	Arbitration Committee noticeboard Requests Enforcement Edit filters Requested False positives Questions Help desk Teahouse Reference desk New articles Requests for comment Village pump Policy Technical Proposals Idea lab WMF Miscellaneous WikiProject proposals Discussions for discussion
Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards

Welcome to the edit warring noticeboard Shortcuts

Update this page

This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule.

See this guide for instructions on creating diffs for this report.
If you see that a user may be about to violate the three-revert rule, consider warning them by placing {{subst:uw-3rr}} on their user talk page.

You must notify any user you have reported.

You may use {{subst:An3-notice}} ~~~~ to do so.

You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Additional notes

When reporting a user here, your own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand WP:REVERT and the definitions below first.
The format and contents of a 3RR/1RR report are important, use the "Click here to create a new report" button below to have a report template with the necessary fields to work from.
Possible alternatives to filing here are dispute resolution, or a request for page protection.
Violations of other restrictions, like WP:1RR violations, may also be brought here. Your report should include two reverts that occurred within a 24-hour period, and a link to where the 1RR restriction was imposed.

Definition of edit warring

Edit warring is a behavior, typically exemplified by the use of repeated edits to "win" a content dispute. It is different from a bold, revert, discuss (BRD) cycle. Reverting vandalism and banned users is not edit warring; at the same time, content disputes, even egregious point of view edits and other good-faith changes do not constitute vandalism. Administrators often must make a judgment call to identify edit warring when cooling disputes. Administrators currently use several measures to determine if a user is edit warring.

Definition of the three-revert rule (3RR)

An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Violations of this rule normally attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Any appearance of gaming the system by reverting a fourth time just outside the 24-hour slot is likely to be treated as a 3RR violation. See here for exemptions.

Sections older than 48 hours are archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Twinkle's ARV can be used on the user's page to more easily report their behavior, including automatic handling of diffs.

Click here to create a new report

Noticeboard archives
Administrators' (archives, search)
349	350	351	352	353	354	355	356	357	358
359	360	361	362	363	364	365	366	367	368
Incidents (archives, search)
1157	1158	1159	1160	1161	1162	1163	1164	1165	1166
1167	1168	1169	1170	1171	1172	1173	1174	1175	1176
Edit-warring/3RR (archives, search)
472	473	474	475	476	477	478	479	480	481
482	483	484	485	486	487	488	489	490	491
Arbitration enforcement (archives)
328	329	330	331	332	333	334	335	336	337
338	339	340	341	342	343	344	345	346	347
Other links
Talk Sockpuppet investigations Backlog

User:94.187.8.87 reported by User:ElKevbo (Result: Page protected)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: User talk:94.187.8.87

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:

Comments:
This is a straight-forward case of edit warring by an unregistered editor (using multiple accounts). This material was also the subject an edit war in 2022. There may be genuine WP:BLP concerns but edit warring without participating in the Talk page section specifically opened to discuss this material is not acceptable. ElKevbo (talk) 12:06, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Page protected for a period of three days by Randykitty Daniel Case (talk) 22:47, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

User:46.217.186.173 reported by User:StephenMacky1 (Result: Page protected)

User being reported: 46.217.186.173 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

13:03, 15 January 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1269596382 by StephenMacky1 (talk)"
12:38, 15 January 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1269506258 by MacaroniPizzaHotDog (talk)"
01:10, 15 January 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1269482182 by StephenMacky1 (talk)"
22:21, 14 January 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1269469326 by JacktheBrown (talk)"
21:11, 14 January 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1269452155 by Fneskljvnl (talk) FASISM TOWARDS MACEDONIA"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

12:41, 15 January 2025 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring on Bulgaria–North Macedonia relations."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments: Persistent edit warring. StephenMacky1 (talk) 13:08, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Page protected EvergreenFir (talk) 20:23, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Asafviki reported by User:Seawolf35 (Result: Blocked from article for 72 hours)

User being reported: Asafviki (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

14:40, 15 January 2025 (UTC) "I understood you at the beginning but now I think you are doing this unnecessarily. All the sources are reliable and you can take a look if you want.İf you really have a sound reason tell me the truth please."
14:13, 15 January 2025 (UTC) "Can you please tell me why you reverted my edit?i just want to know where am I doing wrong."
09:06, 15 January 2025 (UTC) "I am making my edit since there has been no objection to the mentioned sources for 3 days."

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

14:43, 15 January 2025 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

Also LOUT socking with this edit. --Seawolf35 15:16, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Blocked – for a period of 72 hours from article; hopefully in that time someone can explain what they are doing wrong. Daniel Case (talk) 22:52, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

User:TG-article reported by User:Danners430 (Result: Blocked 48 hours)

User being reported: TG-article (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

20:12, 15 January 2025 (UTC) "/* Accidents and incidents */"
19:49, 15 January 2025 (UTC) "/* Accidents and incidents */"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

17:20, 15 January 2025 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Boeing 737 MAX."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

Also edit warring at Batik Air, Boeing 737 MAX, Singapore Airlines Flight 321 and Red Wings Airlines Flight 9268. User has been told to discuss edits on talk pages on multiple occasions, and seemingly refuses to do so. Danners430 (talk) 20:18, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

@Danners430 This is not a 3RR violation. I see two reverts. EvergreenFir (talk) 20:20, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

No it’s not a 3RR violation - but it’s a user that’s consistently edit warring across multiple pages and refusing to engage in talk pages, which is why I believe it still belongs on the edit warring noticeboard.

Edit: I’ll get the rest of the diffs here in a sec… I used Twinkle for the original report. Danners430 (talk) 20:22, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Singapore Airlines Flight 321 - reversion 1, reversion 2 (which was following a pertial reinstatement of their already reverted content)
Batik Air - partial reinstatement of reverted content, followed by reinstating his reverted edit
Red Wings Airlines Flight 9268 - reinstating their previously reverted content
SmartLynx Airlines Estonia - reinstates their reverted edit, then again partially reinstating their reverted edit.
Boeing 737 MAX - legitimately and in good faith alters a template, but then after being reverted doubles down and reinstates the edit.

The user has previously been blocked for this exact same behaviour by User:Canterbury_Tail, and is nt responding to talk page messages. Danners430 (talk) 20:36, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Blocked – for a period of 48 hours Daniel Case (talk) 22:57, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

User:190.201.157.28 reported by User:Flat Out (Result: Blocked 24h)

User being reported: 190.201.157.28 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

23:38, 15 January 2025 (UTC) ""
23:36, 15 January 2025 (UTC) ""
20:42, 15 January 2025 (UTC) "/* Reception */"
17:28, 15 January 2025 (UTC) ""

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

23:38, 15 January 2025 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Wolf Man (2025 film)."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

No, but level 4 warning previously given on editors talk page here

Comments: Blocked – for a period of 24 hours Daniel Case (talk) 21:31, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

User:2607:FEA8:7221:F600:60E4:6CE4:B415:E562 reported by User:Flat Out (Result: Page protected for a month)

User being reported: 2607:FEA8:7221:F600:60E4:6CE4:B415:E562 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

01:44, 16 January 2025 (UTC) ""
01:34, 16 January 2025 (UTC) ""
00:48, 16 January 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1269714333 by MikeAllen (talk) Okay, the vandalism has gone on long enough, you are removing accurate information, and you have engaged in this obsession for days, just accept the information and let it go"
Consecutive edits made from 00:39, 16 January 2025 (UTC) to 00:40, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
1. 00:39, 16 January 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1269684805 by MikeAllen (talk) Enough with the vandalism already"
2. 00:40, 16 January 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1269684573 by MikeAllen (talk) Stop with the vandalism, its accurate information"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

00:53, 16 January 2025 (UTC) "Caution: Removal of content, blanking on Until Dawn (film)."
00:54, 16 January 2025 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Until Dawn (film)."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

01:15, 16 January 2025 (UTC) "/* We edit by consensus */ new section"

Comments: I was just about to report this IP user here until I noticed you already did it a few mins ago...

Anyways, the IP user has actually made five reverts not four, here's the fifth (or actually, the first) one: diff on 18:57, 15 January 2025 (UTC).

The report is missing "previous version reverted to:" so here it is: diff

Regards, — AP 499D25 (talk) 03:40, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Page protected for one month by ToBeFree Daniel Case (talk) 21:32, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Adrikshit reported by User:Aman8188 (Result: Reporter blocked 2 weeks)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:

Comments:
Nominating editor blocked – for a period of two weeks by ToBeFree Daniel Case (talk) 21:37, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

I have also added a CTOPS notice to the article talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 21:38, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

And Aman has been alerted to contentious topics, too. Daniel Case (talk) 21:40, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Janessian reported by User:Insanityclown1 (Result:indefinitely partially blocked)

User being reported: Janessian (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Consecutive edits made from 11:20, 16 January 2025 (UTC) to 11:24, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
1. 11:20, 16 January 2025 (UTC) "Posting the photo of a deceased tagged to such an intense tragic story would greatly hurt the family. Imagine this is your daughter mug shot, killed by her husband, with her summarised tragic story plastered for the world to see. All I did was to remove her picture and you youngsters spare no effort in reverting it."
2. 11:24, 16 January 2025 (UTC) "This man, worked hard his whole life, faithful his entire life, fell ill to a mental illness, does not deserve to have his face tagged to a summarised wrong version of the story for the entire world to see. Imagine this is your brother, who spent his old age in agony. Are you sure this is the right thing to do? What good does it serve to publish pictures of an old case other than to serve what grandiose ideology?"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

User appears to be slow edit warring at this point. JBW has already banned them once for edit warring. Insanityclown1 (talk) 19:18, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

I would also point out that before their first ban for edit warring @Janessian was making comments with a seeming intent to intimidate users that reverted his edits. Insanityclown1 (talk) 19:20, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Isabelle Belato has indefinitely partially blocked Janessian from the Killing of Wong Chik Yeok article. PhilKnight (talk) 21:07, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Timeshifter reported by User:Avatar317 (Result: Blocked 24 hours from editing articles)

User being reported: Timeshifter (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

POV pushing: added the EXACT same graph of (historical US minimum wage) to 36 articles and edit-warring to keep it there.

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:

Comments:

This is an ad hominem attack: "POV pushing: added the EXACT same graph of (historical US minimum wage) to 36 articles and edit-warring to keep it there." I would appreciate if Avatar317 would please stop with the ad hominem attacks in the edit summaries. They violate WP:NPA.

I stand by most of my insertions of the chart:

Commons:File:US federal minimum wage if it had kept pace with productivity. Also, the real minimum wage.png

I agree with some of Avatar317's removals. Other removals seemed to be stalking to see where I added the chart. The regular editors of articles are capable of making up their own minds.

I addressed Avatar317's points in my edit summaries. But he sometimes did not address my points in his 2nd reversions.

I would appreciate not being stalked. And we can always go to the talk page for the articles he regularly edits. --Timeshifter (talk) 23:52, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Every article I reverted you on was on my Watchlist. I did not (yet) go through the list of your edits other than to count them.

You've been around long enough that you should know that per WP:ONUS "The responsibility for achieving consensus for inclusion is on those seeking to include disputed content."; so you COULD have started discussions rather than continuing to push that content into all those articles.

Which article did you NOT revert my removal? I don't see even one. ---Avatar317 00:05, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Economic liberalization. And in Minimum wage in the United States you changed the location which I don't mind.

And you could have addressed my points in your 2nd edit summary instead of doing a kneejerk 2nd reversion in some cases without directly addressing my points. That would save some time before going to the talk page.

And please see Misplaced Pages:Harassment#Wikihounding if you are thinking of following me around to the other articles where the chart is posted. --Timeshifter (talk) 00:23, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

All of your "points" are Original Research WP:OR based on your BELIEF that the chart is relevant to the 36 articles you added it to. Again: "The responsibility for achieving consensus for inclusion is on those seeking to include disputed content."

And if you post the same content into many articles, I will revert those which are inappropriate the same way I would go over a new editor's edits who adds spam to many articles. In case you can't tell, I have an interest in Economics, and keeping extraneous content out of Misplaced Pages. Hounding would be following you to articles OTHER than ones I have an interest in. ---Avatar317 01:25, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Blocked – for a period of 24 hours from editing articles. WP:ONUS applies. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:50, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Ibeaa reported by User:Sundayclose (Result: Blocked one week)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: Soft warning; Second warning

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:

Comments:
Single purpose account dedicated to removing relevant and properly sourced content. Their only excuse is: "guys im gonna be honest idk why im doing this". Sundayclose (talk) 17:19, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Blocked – for a period of one week. Bbb23 (talk) 17:26, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Left CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 20:14, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Tamerlanon reported by User:AirshipJungleman29 (Result: Blocked 72 hours)

User being reported: Tamerlanon (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

17:28, 17 January 2025 (UTC) "Timur was born in 1336, it is impossible to be in 1320"
17:21, 17 January 2025 (UTC) "Timur's Birth Date is 1336 If You Say 1320 Source?"
16:50, 17 January 2025 (UTC) "Timur was in his 70s in his last years before his death. It is impossible for him to be over 85 years old."
11:04, 17 January 2025 (UTC) "Discussion: He was born in 1320. Give a source?"
09:18, 17 January 2025 (UTC) ""
09:16, 17 January 2025 (UTC) "Timur was in his 70s in his last years before his death. It is impossible for him to be over 85 years old."
Consecutive edits made from 08:24, 17 January 2025 (UTC) to 08:40, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
1. 08:24, 17 January 2025 (UTC) ""
2. 08:40, 17 January 2025 (UTC) ""
08:11, 17 January 2025 (UTC) ""

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

09:01, 17 January 2025 (UTC) "Caution: Unconstructive editing on Timur."
10:54, 17 January 2025 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

11:44, 17 January 2025 (UTC) "/* Birthdate */ ping"

Comments:

Blocked – for a period of 72 hours. Bbb23 (talk) 17:46, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Edit-warring IP

The IP 187.36.171.230 has been deleting sourced information in the article of Christianity in Kosovo since 1st of January and edit-warring on the article of Astius and John Koukouzelis . It appears that the user wants to have everything "Albanian" removed. They also removed "Albanian" from the article of Angelina of Serbia and replaced it with Serbian. As I can't notify IPs about ongoing discussions, I will leave it like that. It appears that the user possesses no will for encyclopedic cooperation. AlexBachmann (talk) 19:51, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – malformed report. Please use the "Click here to create a new report" link at the top of this page, which gives a template report, and provide complete diffs. Daniel Case (talk) 20:07, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

It's an IP that has no will for encyclopedic cooperation. Since when do we need to open discussions with them? I've seen admins blocking IPs by other users just notifying them on their talkpage. And I did provide diffs. AlexBachmann (talk) 20:13, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

I know it seems bureaucratic, but we have that form for a reason. It makes it much easier to review these reports. It shouldn't take you too much time to re-enter it properly. Daniel Case (talk) 20:17, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

And by the way, you can notify the IP about this; they do have a talk page. It seems from the history that although they recently blanked it (which they're allowed to do), others have used it in the past to notify them of things like ... reports here. Daniel Case (talk) 20:24, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

{{subst:AN3 report|diffs=# 19:50, 17 January 2025 (UTC) ""

Consecutive edits made from 17:06, 17 January 2025 (UTC) to 17:13, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
1. 17:06, 17 January 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1270003652 by Terrainman ([[User talk Sorry, but they don't stand up historically.To claim that stout is a strong version of mild ale is just embarrassing!"
2. 17:13, 17 January 2025 (UTC) ""
12:34, 17 January 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1269997191 by Terrainman (talk) Irrelevant unless it's properly sourced"
Consecutive edits made from 11:39, 17 January 2025 (UTC) to 11:41, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
1. 11:39, 17 January 2025 (UTC) "Stout has never been a type of ale, weak sourcing too."
2. 11:41, 17 January 2025 (UTC) "/* Oatmeal stout */Not notable"|warnings=|resolves=
19:53, 17 January 2025 (UTC) on User talk:Haldraper "Warning: Edit warring on Porter (beer)."|pagename=Stout|orig=|comment=See also the reverts at Porter (beer). Haldraper has crossed the 3RR in both cases. soetermans. 22:43, 17 January 2025 (UTC)|uid=Haldraper}}

] reported by User:AlexBachmann (Result: )

Previous version reverted to: Christianity in Kosovo: , Astius: , John Koukouzelis:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: -

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: -, but has been warned in the past

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:

Comments:

It seems like the user indeed adds suitable content for content that relates to Serbia. Therefore, a topic ban for Kosovo and Albania would be convenient. I don't know if that's possible here, though. AlexBachmann (talk) 23:13, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Categories: