Revision as of 04:10, 2 February 2019 editVycl1994 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users125,820 edits →Conservation← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 05:25, 11 December 2024 edit undo97.113.83.209 (talk)No edit summary | ||
(70 intermediate revisions by 27 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Insect biodiversity''' accounts for a large proportion of all ] on the planet—over half of the estimated 1.5 million organism ] described are classified as ]s.<ref name="PNAS Species diversity">{{cite journal|last1=N. E. Stork, J. McBroom, C. Gely, and A. J. Hamilton|title=New approaches narrow global species estimates for beetles, insects, and terrestrial arthropods|journal=PNAS|date=16 June 2015|volume=112|issue=24|pages=7519–7523|url=http://www.pnas.org/content/112/24/7519.full.pdf|accessdate=21 September 2017|doi=10.1073/pnas.1502408112|pmc=4475949}}</ref><ref name="Smithsonian - Insect numbers">{{cite web|last1=Smithsonian|title=Numbers of Insects (Species and Individuals)|url=https://www.si.edu/spotlight/buginfo/bugnos|website=BugInfo|publisher=Smithsonian Institution|accessdate=21 September 2017}}</ref> | '''Insect biodiversity''' accounts for a large proportion of all ] on the planet—over half of the estimated 1.5 million organism ] described are classified as ]s.<ref name="PNAS Species diversity">{{cite journal|last1=N. E. Stork, J. McBroom, C. Gely, and A. J. Hamilton|title=New approaches narrow global species estimates for beetles, insects, and terrestrial arthropods|journal=PNAS|date=16 June 2015|volume=112|issue=24|pages=7519–7523|url=http://www.pnas.org/content/112/24/7519.full.pdf|accessdate=21 September 2017|doi=10.1073/pnas.1502408112|pmid=26034274|pmc=4475949|bibcode=2015PNAS..112.7519S|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref name="Smithsonian - Insect numbers">{{cite web|last1=Smithsonian|title=Numbers of Insects (Species and Individuals)|url=https://www.si.edu/spotlight/buginfo/bugnos|website=BugInfo|publisher=Smithsonian Institution|accessdate=21 September 2017}}</ref> | ||
] species, showing just over half of these to be insects]] | ] species, showing just over half of these to be insects]] | ||
== |
==Species diversity== | ||
Estimates of the total number of insect species or those within specific ] are often highly variable. Globally, averages of these predictions estimate there are around 1.5 million beetle species and 5.5 million insect species with around 1 million insect species currently found and described.<ref name="Stork2018">{{cite journal |last1=Stork |first1=Nigel E. |title=How Many Species of Insects and Other Terrestrial Arthropods Are There on Earth? |journal=Annual Review of Entomology |date=7 January 2018 |volume=63 |issue=1 |pages=31–45 |doi=10.1146/annurev-ento-020117-043348}}</ref> | Estimates of the total number of insect species or those within specific ] are often highly variable. Globally, averages of these predictions estimate there are around 1.5 million ] species and 5.5 million insect species, with around 1 million insect species currently found and described.<ref name="Stork2018">{{cite journal |last1=Stork |first1=Nigel E. |title=How Many Species of Insects and Other Terrestrial Arthropods Are There on Earth? |journal=Annual Review of Entomology |date=7 January 2018 |volume=63 |issue=1 |pages=31–45 |doi=10.1146/annurev-ento-020117-043348|pmid=28938083 |s2cid=23755007 |doi-access=free }}</ref> Between 950,000–1,000,000 of all described ] species are considered insects, so over 50% of all described ]s (1.8 million species) are insects (see illustration). With only 950,000 known non-insects, if the actual total number of insects is 5.5 million, they may represent over 80% of the total, and with only about 20,000 new species of all organisms being described each year, most insect species likely will remain undescribed, unless species descriptions greatly increase in rate. | ||
Of the 24 identified ]s of insects, five dominate in terms of numbers of described species, namely ] (beetles), ] (] and ]s), ] (] and ]es), ] (]s, ]s, ]s and ]) and ] (]s, e.g. ]s, ]s, ]s, ]s and ]s). At least 900,000 described species — about 90% of all known insects — belong to the five aforementioned orders, each of which has over 100,000 species, while the next (sixth) most diverse order, ] (]s, ]s and ]s), has just under 24,000 species. | |||
Between 950,000–1,000,000 of all described species are insects, so over 50% of all described eukaryotes (1.8 million) are insects (see illustration). With only 950,000 known non-insects, if the actual number of insects is 5.5 million, they may represent over 80% of the total, and with only about 20,000 new species of all organisms being described each year, most insect species likely will remain undescribed, unless species descriptions greatly increase in rate. Of the 24 orders of insects, four dominate in terms of numbers of described species, with at least 670,000 species included in ], ], ] and ]. | |||
{| |
{| class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align: center" | ||
|+ Estimates of total insect species<ref name="Stork2018"/> | |||
|+ Number of described ] insect species<ref name="Stork2018"/> | |||
|- | |- | ||
! scope="col" | Order | ! scope="col" | Order | ||
! scope="col" | |
! scope="col" | Extant species described | ||
|- | |- | ||
! scope="row" | ] | ! scope="row" | ] | ||
Line 28: | Line 29: | ||
| 23,855 | | 23,855 | ||
|- | |- | ||
! scope="row" | ] | ! scope="row" | ] | ||
| 3,014 | | 3,014 | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 34: | Line 35: | ||
| 463 | | 463 | ||
|- | |- | ||
! scope="row" | ] | ! scope="row" | ] | ||
| 34 | | 34 | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 75: | Line 76: | ||
! scope="row" | ] | ! scope="row" | ] | ||
| 386,500 | | 386,500 | ||
|- | |||
!] | |||
|5,868 | |||
|- | |- | ||
! scope="row" | ] | ! scope="row" | ] | ||
Line 97: | Line 101: | ||
| 757 | | 757 | ||
|} | |} | ||
The fossil record concerning insects stretches back for hundreds of millions of years. It suggests there are ongoing background levels of both ] and ]. Very occasionally, the record also appears to show mass extinctions of insects. The ] saw the greatest level of ], with the ] being the second highest. Insect diversity has recovered after past mass extinctions, due to periods where new species originate with increased frequency, though the recovery can take millions of years.<ref name=fossil>{{citation |journal=American Entomologist |date=1 January 2005 |volume=51 |pages= 14–29|title=The fossil record of insect extinction: new approaches and future directions|first=Conrad|last=Labandeira |doi=10.1093/ae/51.1.14|doi-access=free}}</ref> | |||
===In the Holocene=== | |||
Several studies seemed to indicate that some insect populations are in decline in the late 20th and early 21st centuries, and has also been popularized as the ]. For many studies, factors such as abundance, biomass, and species richness are often found to be declining for some, but not all locations in many studies; some species are in decline while others are not.<ref name="Thomas2019">{{cite journal |last1=Thomas |first1=Chris D. |last2=Jones |first2=T. Hefin |last3=Hartley |first3=Sue E. |title="Insectageddon": A call for more robust data and rigorous analyses |journal=Global Change Biology |volume=25 |issue=6 |pages=1891–1892 |date=18 March 2019 |doi=10.1111/gcb.14608|pmid=30821400 |bibcode=2019GCBio..25.1891T |doi-access=free }}</ref> Every species is affected in different ways by changes in the environment, and it cannot be inferred that there is a consistent decrease across different insect groups. When conditions change, some species easily adapt to the change while others struggle to survive.<ref name=Reckhaus>{{cite book|last=Reckhaus |first=Hans-Dietrich |title=Why Every Fly Counts: A Documentation about the Value and Endangerment of Insects |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=TVcoDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA2 |year=2017|publisher=Springer International Publishing |isbn=978-3-319-58765-3 |pages=1–5}}</ref> | |||
Concerns of ] in the holocene have been attributed to habitat loss from land use changes such as urbanization or agricultural use,<ref name="Tscharntke2005">{{cite journal |last1=Tscharntke |first1=Teja |last2=Klein |first2=Alexandra M. |last3=Kruess |first3=Andreas |last4=Steffan-Dewenter |first4=Ingolf |last5=Thies |first5=Carsten |title=Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity and ecosystem service management |journal=Ecology Letters |date=August 2005 |volume=8 |issue=8 |pages=857–874 |doi=10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00782.x|s2cid=54532666 |doi-access=free |bibcode=2005EcolL...8..857T }}</ref><ref>{{cite book |title=Insect-plant interactions in a crop protection perspective |isbn=978-0-12-803324-1 |pages=313–320|date=2017-01-19 |publisher=Academic Press }}</ref> ] use,<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Braak |first1=Nora |last2=Neve |first2=Rebecca |last3=Jones |first3=Andrew K. |last4=Gibbs |first4=Melanie |last5=Breuker |first5=Casper J. |title=The effects of insecticides on butterflies – A review |journal=Environmental Pollution |date=November 2018 |volume=242 |issue=Pt A |pages=507–518 |doi=10.1016/j.envpol.2018.06.100|pmid=30005263 |bibcode=2018EPoll.242..507B |s2cid=51625489 |url=https://radar.brookes.ac.uk/radar/items/fddc88d3-25f2-4274-9321-2f9b3b72047a/1 }}</ref> ],<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Wagner |first1=David L. |last2=Van Driesche |first2=Roy G. |title=Threats Posed to Rare or Endangered Insects by Invasions of Nonnative Species |journal=Annual Review of Entomology |date=January 2010 |volume=55 |issue=1 |pages=547–568 |doi=10.1146/annurev-ento-112408-085516|pmid=19743915 }}</ref> and artificial lighting.<ref name="Owens2018">{{cite journal |last1=Owens |first1=Avalon C. S. |last2=Lewis |first2=Sara M. |title=The impact of artificial light at night on nocturnal insects: A review and synthesis |journal=Ecology and Evolution |date=November 2018 |volume=8 |issue=22 |pages=11337–11358 |doi=10.1002/ece3.4557|pmid=30519447 |pmc=6262936 |bibcode=2018EcoEv...811337O }}</ref> The use of increased quantities of ]s and ]s on crops have affected not only non-target insect species, but also the plants on which they feed. ] and the introduction of exotic species that compete with the ] ones put the native species under stress, and as a result they are more likely to succumb to pathogens and parasites.<ref name=Reckhaus/> | |||
As of 2017, at least 66 insect species extinctions had been recorded in the previous 500 years, which generally occurred on oceanic islands.<ref name="Briggs2017">{{cite journal |last1=Briggs |first1=John C |title=Emergence of a sixth mass extinction? |journal=Biological Journal of the Linnean Society |date=October 2017 |volume=122 |issue=2 |pages=243–248 |doi=10.1093/biolinnean/blx063|doi-access=free }}</ref> For 203 insect species that had ]-documented population trends in 2013, 33% were in decline with variation in documented species across orders.<ref name=Dirzo2014>{{citation |first1=Rodolfo |last1=Dirzo |authorlink1=Rodolfo Dirzo |first2=Hillary |last2=Young |first3=Mauro |last3=Galetti |first4=Gerardo |last4=Ceballos |first5=Nick |last5=Isaac |first6=Ben |last6=Collen |title=Defaunation in the Anthropocene |journal=] |date=25 July 2014 |volume=345 |number=6195 |pages=401–406 |doi=10.1126/science.1251817 |pmid=25061202 |bibcode=2014Sci...345..401D |s2cid=206555761 |url=http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1436030/1/Collen_Dirzo%20etal%202014%20Science%20Accepted.pdf }}</ref> Most scientific and public attention has been focused on the conservation of larger, charismatic vertebrates, and relatively fewer studies have been done on insect groups, especially ], ] and ]. Data from the past from which to calculate trends is largely unavailable, and what does exist is mostly related to Western Europe and North America. Insect population assessments that have been undertaken were largely concentrated on the more popular insect groups, butterflies and moths, bees, dragonflies and beetles.<ref name="Sánchez-Bayo2019"/> | |||
Some studies have suggested a large proportion of insect species (up to a third of the known species) are threatened with extinction in the 21st century, such as a 2019 review by Sánchez-Bayo and Wyckhuys,<ref name="Sánchez-Bayo2019">{{cite journal |last1=Sánchez-Bayo |first1=Francisco |last2=Wyckhuys |first2=Kris A.G. |title=Worldwide decline of the entomofauna: A review of its drivers |journal=Biological Conservation |date=April 2019 |volume=232 |pages=8–27 |doi=10.1016/j.biocon.2019.01.020|doi-access=free |bibcode=2019BCons.232....8S }}</ref> though ecologist Manu Sanders notes that many of these findings are often biased limited to specific geographic areas and specific groups of species.<ref name="Sanders2019">{{cite web |last1=Saunders |first1=Manu |title=Insectageddon is a great story. But what are the facts? |url=https://ecologyisnotadirtyword.com/2019/02/16/insectageddon-is-a-great-story-but-what-are-the-facts/ |website=Ecology is not a dirty word |accessdate=24 February 2019 |language=en |date=16 February 2019}}</ref> The methodology of the Sánchez-Bayo & Wyckhuys study has been questioned; the search string used to sift through the scientific literature was "(insect* + decline* + survey)". This meant that the authors identified studies finding insect declines, but may have missed those that found increases in insect populations or stability.<ref name="Thomas2019"/><ref name="Sanders2019"/> In assessing the study methodology, an editorial in ] stated, "An unbiased review of the literature would still find declines, but estimates based on this 'unidirectional' methodology are not credible.<ref name="Thomas2019"/> However, according to the authors of that review "more than half of the surveys were obtained from references cited in other reports" and "the 73 insect surveys cover all species in a particular taxon – irrespective of them exhibiting declines, stable or increasing trends in their distribution or abundance".<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Sanchez-Bayo |first1=Francisco |title=Response to "Global insect decline: Comments on Sánchez-Bayo and Wyckhuys (2019)" |journal=Biological Conservation |date=April 2019 |volume=223 |pages=334–335 |doi=10.1016/j.biocon.2019.03.020 |bibcode=2019BCons.233..334S |s2cid=150059494 }}</ref> Entomology professor ] suggested that media reports of an "Ecological Armageddon" may be exaggerated and advocated for more funding to allow better collection of long term data on the decline.<ref name=Leather>{{citation |journal=]|date=20 December 2017 |volume=172 |pages=1–3 |title="Ecological Armageddon" – more evidence for the drastic decline in insect numbers |first=Simon |last=Leather |authorlink1=Simon Leather|doi=10.1111/aab.12410|url=https://hau.collections.crest.ac.uk/17242/1/Simon%20Leather%20Ecological%20Armageddon%20upload.pdf }}</ref> | |||
Claims of pending mass insect extinctions or "insect apocalypse" based on a subset of studies have been popularized in news reports, but often make claims extrapolated beyond the study data or ].<ref name="ESA2019">{{cite web |title=Global Insect Biodiversity: Frequently Asked Questions |url=http://www.entsoc.org/sites/default/files/files/Science-Policy/2019/Global%20Insect%20Biodiversity%20FAQs.pdf |publisher=Entomological Society of America |accessdate=6 March 2019}}</ref> The ] has stated there are not sufficient data to predict an imminent mass extinction of insects.<ref name="ESA2019"/> For some insect groups such as some butterflies, bees, and beetles, declines in abundance and diversity have been documented in European studies. Other areas have shown increases in some insect species, although trends in most regions are currently unknown. It is difficult to assess long-term trends in insect abundance or diversity because historical measurements are generally not known for many species. Robust data to assess at-risk areas or species is especially lacking for arctic and tropical regions and a majority of the southern hemisphere.<ref name="ESA2019"/> | |||
==Conservation== | ==Conservation== | ||
{{More citations needed section|date=May 2024}} | |||
] | ] | ||
While ] is a global problem, conserving habitat for species of insects is uncommon and generally of low priority, although there are exceptions. More commonly insect conservation occurs indirectly, either through the setting aside of large portions of land using "wilderness preservation" as the motive, or through protection of "charismatic vertebrates". Some studies estimate that global insect populations are in rapid decline, perhaps by as much as 80% in recent decades. The ] describes people noticing vastly fewer insects flying into the path of their cars after long drives, and this may reflect worldwide loss of insect ]. | While ] is a global problem, conserving habitat for species of insects is uncommon and generally of low priority, although there are exceptions. More commonly insect conservation occurs indirectly, either through the setting aside of large portions of land using "wilderness preservation" as the motive, or through protection of "charismatic vertebrates". Some studies estimate that global insect populations are in rapid decline, perhaps by as much as 80% in recent decades. The ] describes people noticing vastly fewer insects flying into the path of their cars after long drives, and this may reflect worldwide loss of insect ]. | ||
Single-species insect conservation can preserve other species indirectly; this preservation-by-default is referred to as the ]. Showy insects such as butterflies or large, colourful beetles serve as ], and can expand public awareness and financial contributions for conservation efforts. Wealthy nations such as the United States do list species of concern, and occasionally insects are placed on its Endangered Species List. In 2017 this list had classified over 80 insects as endangered species, the majority of them beetles or butterflies; a significant percentage of these listed insects are native only to the Hawaiian Islands.<ref name="Endangered Species List">{{cite web|last1=US Fish and Wildlife Service|title=Conserving the Nature of America|url=https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp0/pub/SpeciesReport.do?groups=I&listingType=L&mapstatus=1|website=ECOS Environmental Conservation Online System|publisher=US Fish and Wildlife Service|accessdate=21 September 2017}}</ref> Migratory species, such as the well-known monarch butterfly ('']''), are in need of special conservation methods. One species may require several habitat locations, even across international boundaries, for the different periods of their migratory patterns. | Single-species insect conservation can preserve other species indirectly; this preservation-by-default is referred to as the ]. Showy insects such as butterflies or large, colourful beetles serve as ], and can expand public awareness and financial contributions for conservation efforts. Wealthy nations such as the United States do list species of concern, and occasionally insects are placed on its Endangered Species List. In 2017 this list had classified over 80 insects as endangered species, the majority of them beetles or butterflies; a significant percentage of these listed insects are native only to the Hawaiian Islands.<ref name="Endangered Species List">{{cite web|last1=US Fish and Wildlife Service|title=Conserving the Nature of America|url=https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp0/pub/SpeciesReport.do?groups=I&listingType=L&mapstatus=1|website=ECOS Environmental Conservation Online System|publisher=US Fish and Wildlife Service|accessdate=21 September 2017}}</ref> Migratory species, such as the well-known monarch butterfly ('']''), are in need of special conservation methods. One species may require several habitat locations, even across international boundaries, for the different periods of their migratory patterns. | ||
Line 107: | Line 125: | ||
==Agriculture== | ==Agriculture== | ||
In ] ]s, biodiversity is |
In ] ]s, biodiversity is important for the production of food and for ecological services such as the recycling of ]s, regulation of ] and local hydrological processes, and ] of pests.{{citation needed|date=September 2017}} | ||
⚫ | In the United States alone, ] by bees accounts for over ]9 billion of economic ].<ref>{{cite journal |author=W. S. Robinson, R. Nowogrodski & R. A. Morse. |title=Pollination parameters |journal=Gleanings in Bee Culture |volume=117|year=1989|pages=148–152}}</ref> According to some estimates, over ⅓ of the human diet can be traced directly or indirectly to bee pollination.<ref>{{Cite book |author=S. E. McGregor |title=Insect pollination of cultivated crop plants |publisher=USDA Agriculture Handbook 496, Washington, D.C.|year=1976 |url=http://gears.tucson.ars.ag.gov/book/}}</ref> ] have been reported in at least one region or country on every continent except Antarctica, which has no pollinators. The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment <ref>{{cite book |title=Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis |publisher=], Washington, D. C.}}</ref> concluded that with the global decline in the amount of pollinators, there is not a complete loss of fruit or seeds, but a significant decrease in quantity and viability in fruits, and a lower number of seeds. | ||
==Food (human)== | |||
Insects are a nutritional source for much of the animal world. Among humans, over 1000 species of insects have been used as food somewhere in the world. ] is common in ] and ], ], ], and ]. ]s, ]s, ]s, ]s, ]s, ]s, ], and ] ]e are examples of insects that are used as food sources. Insects are high in ], ], and a number of ]s and ]s and can form up to 5-10% of the annual animal protein consumption of certain indigenous groups .<ref>{{cite book |author=P. S. Cranston & P. J. Gullan |title=The Insects: An Outline of Entomology |publisher=Blackwell, Oxford |year=2005 |isbn=1-4051-1113-5}}</ref> Many insects are said to have a nutty flavour, along with a high ]. | |||
⚫ | In the United States alone, ] by bees accounts for over ]9 billion of economic ].<ref>{{cite journal |author=W. S. Robinson, R. Nowogrodski & R. A. Morse. |title=Pollination parameters |journal=Gleanings in Bee Culture |volume=117|year=1989|pages=148–152}}</ref> According to some estimates, over ⅓ of the human diet can be traced directly or indirectly to bee pollination.<ref>{{Cite book |author=S. E. McGregor |title=Insect pollination of cultivated crop plants |publisher=USDA Agriculture Handbook 496, Washington, D.C. |year=1976 |url=http://gears.tucson.ars.ag.gov/book/ |access-date=2007-04-09 |archive-date=2023-03-26 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230326235745/http://gears.tucson.ars.ag.gov/book/ |url-status=dead }}</ref> ] have been reported in at least one region or country on every continent except Antarctica, which has no pollinators. The ] <ref>{{cite book |title=Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis |publisher=], Washington, D. C.}}</ref> concluded that with the global decline in the amount of pollinators, there is not a complete loss of fruit or seeds, but a significant decrease in quantity and viability in fruits, and a lower number of seeds. | ||
==Human culture== | |||
Early human civilisations held insects as an important element within their cultures. Most famously, ] were central religious artifacts within Egyptian culture. ], such as the ] portrayed as a ], is seen in the East as well. The ] viewed ]s as a symbol of birth or immortality, the ] of the ] believe that the ] represents creation and patience, and the ] also created beautiful representations of scarab beetles using colourful stones. | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
*] | *] | ||
*] | |||
==References== | ==References== |
Latest revision as of 05:25, 11 December 2024
Insect biodiversity accounts for a large proportion of all biodiversity on the planet—over half of the estimated 1.5 million organism species described are classified as insects.
Species diversity
Estimates of the total number of insect species or those within specific orders are often highly variable. Globally, averages of these predictions estimate there are around 1.5 million beetle species and 5.5 million insect species, with around 1 million insect species currently found and described. Between 950,000–1,000,000 of all described animal species are considered insects, so over 50% of all described eukaryotes (1.8 million species) are insects (see illustration). With only 950,000 known non-insects, if the actual total number of insects is 5.5 million, they may represent over 80% of the total, and with only about 20,000 new species of all organisms being described each year, most insect species likely will remain undescribed, unless species descriptions greatly increase in rate.
Of the 24 identified orders of insects, five dominate in terms of numbers of described species, namely Coleoptera (beetles), Lepidoptera (butterflies and moths), Diptera (flies and mosquitoes), Hymenoptera (ants, bees, wasps and sawflies) and Hemiptera (true bugs, e.g. cicadas, aphids, leafhoppers, bed bugs and assassin bugs). At least 900,000 described species — about 90% of all known insects — belong to the five aforementioned orders, each of which has over 100,000 species, while the next (sixth) most diverse order, Orthoptera (locusts, grasshoppers and crickets), has just under 24,000 species.
Order | Extant species described |
---|---|
Archaeognatha | 513 |
Zygentoma | 560 |
Ephemeroptera | 3,240 |
Odonata | 5,899 |
Orthoptera | 23,855 |
Phasmatodea | 3,014 |
Embioptera | 463 |
Grylloblattidae | 34 |
Mantophasmatodea | 15 |
Plecoptera | 3,743 |
Dermaptera | 1,978 |
Zoraptera | 37 |
Mantodea | 2,400 |
Blattodea | 7,314 |
Psocoptera | 5,720 |
Phthiraptera | 5,102 |
Thysanoptera | 5,864 |
Hemiptera | 103,590 |
Hymenoptera | 116,861 |
Strepsiptera | 609 |
Coleoptera | 386,500 |
Neuroptera | 5,868 |
Megaloptera | 354 |
Raphidioptera | 254 |
Trichoptera | 14,391 |
Lepidoptera | 157,338 |
Diptera | 155,477 |
Siphonaptera | 2,075 |
Mecoptera | 757 |
The fossil record concerning insects stretches back for hundreds of millions of years. It suggests there are ongoing background levels of both new species appearing and extinctions. Very occasionally, the record also appears to show mass extinctions of insects. The Permian–Triassic extinction event saw the greatest level of insect extinction, with the Cretaceous–Paleogene being the second highest. Insect diversity has recovered after past mass extinctions, due to periods where new species originate with increased frequency, though the recovery can take millions of years.
In the Holocene
Several studies seemed to indicate that some insect populations are in decline in the late 20th and early 21st centuries, and has also been popularized as the windshield phenomenon. For many studies, factors such as abundance, biomass, and species richness are often found to be declining for some, but not all locations in many studies; some species are in decline while others are not. Every species is affected in different ways by changes in the environment, and it cannot be inferred that there is a consistent decrease across different insect groups. When conditions change, some species easily adapt to the change while others struggle to survive.
Concerns of declines in insect abundance in the holocene have been attributed to habitat loss from land use changes such as urbanization or agricultural use, pesticide use, invasive species, and artificial lighting. The use of increased quantities of insecticides and herbicides on crops have affected not only non-target insect species, but also the plants on which they feed. Climate change and the introduction of exotic species that compete with the indigenous ones put the native species under stress, and as a result they are more likely to succumb to pathogens and parasites.
As of 2017, at least 66 insect species extinctions had been recorded in the previous 500 years, which generally occurred on oceanic islands. For 203 insect species that had IUCN-documented population trends in 2013, 33% were in decline with variation in documented species across orders. Most scientific and public attention has been focused on the conservation of larger, charismatic vertebrates, and relatively fewer studies have been done on insect groups, especially Diptera, Orthoptera and Hemiptera. Data from the past from which to calculate trends is largely unavailable, and what does exist is mostly related to Western Europe and North America. Insect population assessments that have been undertaken were largely concentrated on the more popular insect groups, butterflies and moths, bees, dragonflies and beetles.
Some studies have suggested a large proportion of insect species (up to a third of the known species) are threatened with extinction in the 21st century, such as a 2019 review by Sánchez-Bayo and Wyckhuys, though ecologist Manu Sanders notes that many of these findings are often biased limited to specific geographic areas and specific groups of species. The methodology of the Sánchez-Bayo & Wyckhuys study has been questioned; the search string used to sift through the scientific literature was "(insect* + decline* + survey)". This meant that the authors identified studies finding insect declines, but may have missed those that found increases in insect populations or stability. In assessing the study methodology, an editorial in Global Change Biology stated, "An unbiased review of the literature would still find declines, but estimates based on this 'unidirectional' methodology are not credible. However, according to the authors of that review "more than half of the surveys were obtained from references cited in other reports" and "the 73 insect surveys cover all species in a particular taxon – irrespective of them exhibiting declines, stable or increasing trends in their distribution or abundance". Entomology professor Simon Leather suggested that media reports of an "Ecological Armageddon" may be exaggerated and advocated for more funding to allow better collection of long term data on the decline.
Claims of pending mass insect extinctions or "insect apocalypse" based on a subset of studies have been popularized in news reports, but often make claims extrapolated beyond the study data or hyperbolize study findings. The Entomological Society of America has stated there are not sufficient data to predict an imminent mass extinction of insects. For some insect groups such as some butterflies, bees, and beetles, declines in abundance and diversity have been documented in European studies. Other areas have shown increases in some insect species, although trends in most regions are currently unknown. It is difficult to assess long-term trends in insect abundance or diversity because historical measurements are generally not known for many species. Robust data to assess at-risk areas or species is especially lacking for arctic and tropical regions and a majority of the southern hemisphere.
Conservation
This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources in this section. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (May 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
While biodiversity loss is a global problem, conserving habitat for species of insects is uncommon and generally of low priority, although there are exceptions. More commonly insect conservation occurs indirectly, either through the setting aside of large portions of land using "wilderness preservation" as the motive, or through protection of "charismatic vertebrates". Some studies estimate that global insect populations are in rapid decline, perhaps by as much as 80% in recent decades. The windshield phenomenon describes people noticing vastly fewer insects flying into the path of their cars after long drives, and this may reflect worldwide loss of insect abundance.
Single-species insect conservation can preserve other species indirectly; this preservation-by-default is referred to as the umbrella effect. Showy insects such as butterflies or large, colourful beetles serve as flagship species, and can expand public awareness and financial contributions for conservation efforts. Wealthy nations such as the United States do list species of concern, and occasionally insects are placed on its Endangered Species List. In 2017 this list had classified over 80 insects as endangered species, the majority of them beetles or butterflies; a significant percentage of these listed insects are native only to the Hawaiian Islands. Migratory species, such as the well-known monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus), are in need of special conservation methods. One species may require several habitat locations, even across international boundaries, for the different periods of their migratory patterns.
Insect conservation has been labelled in the past as a concern only for the affluent. The developing country of Papua New Guinea has a "happily ever after" ending in their attempts to preserve the world's largest butterfly, Queen Alexandra's birdwing (Ornithoptera alexandrae). This species is restricted to a very small range of habitat due to specificity in their diet. In the international market of insect collecting, the butterfly can retrieve up to US$2000. In 1978, the government of Papua New Guinea set up the Insect Farming and Trading Agency (IFTA) to regulate the exploitation and conservation of Queen Alexandra's birdwing and other valuable butterflies.
Agriculture
In agricultural ecosystems, biodiversity is important for the production of food and for ecological services such as the recycling of nutrients, regulation of microclimate and local hydrological processes, and biological control of pests.
In the United States alone, pollination by bees accounts for over US$9 billion of economic revenue. According to some estimates, over ⅓ of the human diet can be traced directly or indirectly to bee pollination. Losses of key pollinators have been reported in at least one region or country on every continent except Antarctica, which has no pollinators. The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment concluded that with the global decline in the amount of pollinators, there is not a complete loss of fruit or seeds, but a significant decrease in quantity and viability in fruits, and a lower number of seeds.
See also
References
- N. E. Stork, J. McBroom, C. Gely, and A. J. Hamilton (16 June 2015). "New approaches narrow global species estimates for beetles, insects, and terrestrial arthropods" (PDF). PNAS. 112 (24): 7519–7523. Bibcode:2015PNAS..112.7519S. doi:10.1073/pnas.1502408112. PMC 4475949. PMID 26034274. Retrieved 21 September 2017.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - Smithsonian. "Numbers of Insects (Species and Individuals)". BugInfo. Smithsonian Institution. Retrieved 21 September 2017.
- ^ Stork, Nigel E. (7 January 2018). "How Many Species of Insects and Other Terrestrial Arthropods Are There on Earth?". Annual Review of Entomology. 63 (1): 31–45. doi:10.1146/annurev-ento-020117-043348. PMID 28938083. S2CID 23755007.
- Labandeira, Conrad (1 January 2005), "The fossil record of insect extinction: new approaches and future directions", American Entomologist, 51: 14–29, doi:10.1093/ae/51.1.14
- ^ Thomas, Chris D.; Jones, T. Hefin; Hartley, Sue E. (18 March 2019). ""Insectageddon": A call for more robust data and rigorous analyses". Global Change Biology. 25 (6): 1891–1892. Bibcode:2019GCBio..25.1891T. doi:10.1111/gcb.14608. PMID 30821400.
- ^ Reckhaus, Hans-Dietrich (2017). Why Every Fly Counts: A Documentation about the Value and Endangerment of Insects. Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–5. ISBN 978-3-319-58765-3.
- Tscharntke, Teja; Klein, Alexandra M.; Kruess, Andreas; Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf; Thies, Carsten (August 2005). "Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity and ecosystem service management". Ecology Letters. 8 (8): 857–874. Bibcode:2005EcolL...8..857T. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00782.x. S2CID 54532666.
- Insect-plant interactions in a crop protection perspective. Academic Press. 2017-01-19. pp. 313–320. ISBN 978-0-12-803324-1.
- Braak, Nora; Neve, Rebecca; Jones, Andrew K.; Gibbs, Melanie; Breuker, Casper J. (November 2018). "The effects of insecticides on butterflies – A review". Environmental Pollution. 242 (Pt A): 507–518. Bibcode:2018EPoll.242..507B. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2018.06.100. PMID 30005263. S2CID 51625489.
- Wagner, David L.; Van Driesche, Roy G. (January 2010). "Threats Posed to Rare or Endangered Insects by Invasions of Nonnative Species". Annual Review of Entomology. 55 (1): 547–568. doi:10.1146/annurev-ento-112408-085516. PMID 19743915.
- Owens, Avalon C. S.; Lewis, Sara M. (November 2018). "The impact of artificial light at night on nocturnal insects: A review and synthesis". Ecology and Evolution. 8 (22): 11337–11358. Bibcode:2018EcoEv...811337O. doi:10.1002/ece3.4557. PMC 6262936. PMID 30519447.
- Briggs, John C (October 2017). "Emergence of a sixth mass extinction?". Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 122 (2): 243–248. doi:10.1093/biolinnean/blx063.
- Dirzo, Rodolfo; Young, Hillary; Galetti, Mauro; Ceballos, Gerardo; Isaac, Nick; Collen, Ben (25 July 2014), "Defaunation in the Anthropocene" (PDF), Science, 345 (6195): 401–406, Bibcode:2014Sci...345..401D, doi:10.1126/science.1251817, PMID 25061202, S2CID 206555761
- ^ Sánchez-Bayo, Francisco; Wyckhuys, Kris A.G. (April 2019). "Worldwide decline of the entomofauna: A review of its drivers". Biological Conservation. 232: 8–27. Bibcode:2019BCons.232....8S. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2019.01.020.
- ^ Saunders, Manu (16 February 2019). "Insectageddon is a great story. But what are the facts?". Ecology is not a dirty word. Retrieved 24 February 2019.
- Sanchez-Bayo, Francisco (April 2019). "Response to "Global insect decline: Comments on Sánchez-Bayo and Wyckhuys (2019)"". Biological Conservation. 223: 334–335. Bibcode:2019BCons.233..334S. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2019.03.020. S2CID 150059494.
- Leather, Simon (20 December 2017), ""Ecological Armageddon" – more evidence for the drastic decline in insect numbers" (PDF), Annals of Applied Biology, 172: 1–3, doi:10.1111/aab.12410
- ^ "Global Insect Biodiversity: Frequently Asked Questions" (PDF). Entomological Society of America. Retrieved 6 March 2019.
- US Fish and Wildlife Service. "Conserving the Nature of America". ECOS Environmental Conservation Online System. US Fish and Wildlife Service. Retrieved 21 September 2017.
- W. S. Robinson, R. Nowogrodski & R. A. Morse. (1989). "Pollination parameters". Gleanings in Bee Culture. 117: 148–152.
- S. E. McGregor (1976). Insect pollination of cultivated crop plants. USDA Agriculture Handbook 496, Washington, D.C. Archived from the original on 2023-03-26. Retrieved 2007-04-09.
- Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis. World Resources Institute, Washington, D. C.