Talk:Reliability of Misplaced Pages/to do: Difference between revisions

< Talk:Reliability of Misplaced Pages Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 19:37, 16 February 2019 editGoingBatty (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers637,154 edits Add more recent examples← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 07:06, 25 October 2019 edit undoTsilb (talk \| contribs)166 edits removed TODO:Expand Lead, because the lead is longer than the length it said it should be expanded to.
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 6:		Line 6:
	\|verify=		\|verify=
	\|cleanup= Merge ] with ].		\|cleanup= Merge ] with ].
	\|expand=		\|expand={{bulleted list
		⚫	\|Should there be something on ] - e.g. the assessment scheme, WikiProjects, featured articles, peer review etc?
	*Expand ] a little bit - three detailed paragraphs would be good for an article of this length.
		⚫	\|Find references where called for
⚫	*Should there be something on ] - e.g. the assessment scheme, WikiProjects, featured articles, peer review etc?
		⚫	\|Add more recent examples
⚫	*Find references where called for
			}}
⚫	*Add more recent examples
	\|disambiguation=		\|disambiguation=
	\|stubs=		\|stubs=
Line 16:		Line 16:
	\|npov=		\|npov=
	\|infobox=		\|infobox=
	\|other= *Discuss changing the subject of the article to something a bit broader (e.g. ], ], ], ], ], ], ] etc) (reliability being a more narrow subject, see ]). Discuss overlap with ] and clarify the scope of the two articles.		\|other= Discuss changing the subject of the article to something a bit broader (e.g. ], ], ], ], ], ], ] etc) (reliability being a more narrow subject, see ]). Discuss overlap with ] and clarify the scope of the two articles.
	}}		}}

Latest revision as of 07:06, 25 October 2019

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Cleanup : Merge Criticism of Misplaced Pages#Systemic bias in coverage with Reliability of Misplaced Pages#Coverage.
Expand :
- Should there be something on Misplaced Pages assessment of itself - e.g. the assessment scheme, WikiProjects, featured articles, peer review etc?
- Find references where called for
- Add more recent examples
Other : Discuss changing the subject of the article to something a bit broader (e.g. quality of Misplaced Pages, quality and comprehensiveness of Misplaced Pages, evaluation of Misplaced Pages, assessment of Misplaced Pages, appraisal of Misplaced Pages, perspectives on Misplaced Pages, reception of Misplaced Pages etc) (reliability being a more narrow subject, see Talk:Reliability of Misplaced Pages#Article name). Discuss overlap with criticism of Misplaced Pages and clarify the scope of the two articles.