| Revision as of 16:54, 17 November 2006 editQ Jenkins (talk | contribs)18 edits Do not vandalize user pages.← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 16:05, 23 November 2015 edit undoMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,133,055 edits →ArbCom elections are now open!: new section | ||
| (48 intermediate revisions by 30 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ⚫ | == Update == | ||
| {| class="messagebox" style="background: AntiqueWhite;" | |||
| After consultation with the local authorities and the TelCo, the series of hangup calls I received after getting what I believed were spurrious death threats were an unrelated automated phone calling system (Which was apparently deeply distressed about the entire event). I apologize for alarming anyone. Additionally, I claim this username as my own. ] - ] 15:33, 11 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| |- | |||
| |This talk page is '''automatically archived''' by Werdnabot. Any sections older than '''7''' days are automatically archived to ''']'''. Sections without timestamps are not archived | |||
| |- | |||
| |}<!-- BEGIN WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE --><!-- This page is automatically archived by Werdnabot-->{{User:Werdnabot/Archiver/Linkhere}} <!--This is an empty template, but transcluding it counts as a link, meaning Werdnabot is directed to this page - DO NOT SUBST IT --><!--Werdnabot-Archive Age-7 DoUnreplied-Yes Target-User talk:JBKramer/Archive/{{CURRENTMONTHABBREV}}06--><!--END WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE--> | |||
| == This month's MCB Collaboration of the Month article is Peripheral membrane protein! == | |||
| == Molecular and Cellular Biology Wikiproject Newsletter == | |||
| {{MCB AID|current=Peripheral membrane protein|last=RNA interference}} – ]] 18:55, 14 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Molecular and Cellular Biology/Newsletter/October 2006}} | |||
| The Arbitration Committee has rendered decisions passing a motion to apply discretionary sanctions remedies to the case linked above. Any uninvolved administrator may, on his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working in the area of conflict ("articles which relate to pseudoscience, broadly interpreted") if, despite being warned, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. | |||
| archsign ] 15:29, 17 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| The final text of the motions can be found at the case page linked above. | |||
| == Permanent deletion of record for Ewart's RfC; even my own contribution history == | |||
| Is this acceptable on a wiki? Even my own contribution history of edits at Ewart's RfC has been . As you know the RfC was not vandalism. ] 13:41, 8 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| — ] <sup>]</sup> ''for the Arbitration Committee,'' 14:55, 28 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Reponded on your talk. ] 13:46, 8 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | == Civility == | ||
| Hi, I noticed you have written material on and shown an interest in civility on wikipedia. I have created a poll page to gauge community feelings on how civility is managed in practice currently at ], so input from as many people as possible is welcomed. ] (] '''·''' ]) 23:57, 29 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| == My question on the science reference desk == | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 16:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| What's wrong with it? Why have you repeatedly removed it as vandalism? --] 13:34, 13 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692039973 --> | |||
| :User is asking idiotic questions about seagulls, disrupting the Reference Desk. His non-serious question is non-serious. ] 13:37, 13 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::What's with the attitude? Despite your assuming bad faith on my part, my question was serious and not intended as vandalism/disruption/trolling at all. --] 13:42, 13 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::: Of course not. ] 13:53, 13 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | == |
||
| Thanks very much for your offer of assistance. Can you take a look at ], a page I intend to link to when I remove comments, and tell me what you think of it? You coulld of course use that, or your own variation, when you remove stuff. -- ] 18:09, 13 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :That's a valid point, and one I've thought about. My feeling is that I am implicitly using my authority as an administrator to insist that people not restore the comments, and that they have a right to claim that I'm misusing my position on that basis. Do you think this is wrong, or should I make it more clear, or what? -- ] 18:43, 13 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::How's it look now? -- ] 18:56, 13 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == RE: Medical advice == | |||
| Thanks, but my question was about something that happened a few years ago, and it's out of curiousity, not necessity. I'm not sure it contravenes the medical advice rule... ] 18:19, 13 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Re Thanks== | |||
| Thank you for protecting the article. At some point, the wrong version will be the one I prefer, but in the meanwhile, hopefully discussion will break out. ] 17:42, 14 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :No worries. Well, logically and neutrally i had to restore the version just before the unprotection. Otherwise, my protection would not have made sense. -- '']'' <small>]</small> 17:49, 14 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Re: Miltopia == | |||
| Sure. I suppose I figured such a condition was more or less common sense, but it wouldn't hurt to spell it out explicitly. Will do that in just a moment. ] 15:42, 15 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == You are being used as an excuse to revert war. == | |||
| ], who desperatly wants information removed from some article about some indian guru is using your statement that individual incidents discussed in a Salon.com article should not be included in the article about some indian guru is actually a licence on his part to engage in revert wars in an attempt to remove all mention of said article - in fact, his most recent statement was that you are "the voice of consensus." I am frusterated and disengaging. ] 20:05, 15 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :I'll look at it. I don't usually have time, but caught up and bored. ] 20:08, 15 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Stalin== | |||
| Yes, they probably are. :) //] 22:51, 15 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == RFA Thanks == | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid {{{border|blue}}}; background-color: {{{color|#0F8}}};" | |||
| !colspan="2" align="center" style=" background-color: #0F3;" | '''Thanks!''' | |||
| |- | |||
| !colspan="2" align="center" | Thanks for your input on my (nearly recent) ], which regretfully achived no consensus, with votes of 68/28/2. I am grateful for the input received, both positive and in opposition, and I'd like to thank you for your participation. | |||
| |- | |||
| !colspan="2" align="right" | ] 05:34, 16 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| ==Democratic Underground dispute== | |||
| I will take a look at that and post my opinion on the talkpage. Regards, ] 22:55, 16 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Mediation Cabal == | |||
| Please see: ]. Thank you. ] 12:18, 17 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | == |
||
| What you did is considered "Vandalism" and if you do not stop, I will report you on the Administrators Notice Board, per the Vandalism Policy. Thank you for your consideration. ] 16:54, 17 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:05, 23 November 2015
Update
After consultation with the local authorities and the TelCo, the series of hangup calls I received after getting what I believed were spurrious death threats were an unrelated automated phone calling system (Which was apparently deeply distressed about the entire event). I apologize for alarming anyone. Additionally, I claim this username as my own. Hipocrite - «Talk» 15:33, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
This month's MCB Collaboration of the Month article is Peripheral membrane protein!
| Peripheral membrane protein The Molecular and Cellular Biology WikiProject's current Collaboration of the Month article is Peripheral membrane protein. |
– ClockworkSoul 18:55, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Pseudoscience
The Arbitration Committee has rendered decisions passing a motion to apply discretionary sanctions remedies to the case linked above. Any uninvolved administrator may, on his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working in the area of conflict ("articles which relate to pseudoscience, broadly interpreted") if, despite being warned, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process.
The final text of the motions can be found at the case page linked above.
— Coren for the Arbitration Committee, 14:55, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Civility
Hi, I noticed you have written material on and shown an interest in civility on wikipedia. I have created a poll page to gauge community feelings on how civility is managed in practice currently at Misplaced Pages:Civility/Poll, so input from as many people as possible is welcomed. Casliber (talk · contribs) 23:57, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)