| Revision as of 06:53, 27 December 2004 editNeutrality (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators165,397 edits →[]← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 02:07, 10 February 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| === ] === | === ] === | ||
| ] from the ]]] | ] from the ]]] | ||
| ''This image was previously a featured picture and was renominated as it never went through the featured picture candidates process.'' | ''This image was previously a featured picture and was renominated as it never went through the featured picture candidates process.'' | ||
| * '''Oppose'''. Lovely image, shame about the clouds. ] • ] 03:04, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC) | * '''Oppose'''. Lovely image, shame about the clouds. ] • ] 03:04, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC) | ||
| * '''Oppose'''. Sadly, though. It'd be a really nice image if it weren't so darn blurry over more than half of it. ]|] 09:18, 2004 Dec 22 (UTC) | * '''Oppose'''. Sadly, though. It'd be a really nice image if it weren't so darn blurry over more than half of it. ]|] 09:18, 2004 Dec 22 (UTC) | ||
| * Support. Keep it. You're still able to make out many interesting features from it. ] 10:21, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC) | * Support. Keep it. You're still able to make out many interesting features from it. ] 10:21, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC) | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| *'''Support''' - Though not perfect its interesting. I also don't like the blurred elements and scan lines, but it is still more real and direct than the Earthlights composite. - ] 11:20, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC) | *'''Support''' - Though not perfect its interesting. I also don't like the blurred elements and scan lines, but it is still more real and direct than the Earthlights composite. - ] 11:20, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Support'''. -] | ] 08:53, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC) | *'''Support'''. -] | ] 08:53, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Oppose |
*'''Oppose'''. ]<sup>]</sup> 06:53, Dec 27, 2004 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Support'''. Nice ] '''/''' ] 00:19, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Oppose'''. ] ] 08:32, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC) | |||
| * '''Oppose''' Much too blurry to give me any pleasure - ] 11:14, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ** '''Not retained as a featured picture: +5 / -7 ''' - ] 20:16, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC) | |||
| <br style="clear:both;" /> | <br style="clear:both;" /> | ||
Latest revision as of 02:07, 10 February 2023
London ISS
This image was previously a featured picture and was renominated as it never went through the featured picture candidates process.
- Oppose. Lovely image, shame about the clouds. ed g2s • talk 03:04, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Oppose. Sadly, though. It'd be a really nice image if it weren't so darn blurry over more than half of it. grendel|khan 09:18, 2004 Dec 22 (UTC)
- Support. Keep it. You're still able to make out many interesting features from it. Enochlau 10:21, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Oppose Sadly tooo blury ] 12:17, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Oppose--ZayZayEM 00:51, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Support -- it is striking how much this resembles fractured glass. --Elijah 05:50, 2004 Dec 24 (UTC)
- Support - Though not perfect its interesting. I also don't like the blurred elements and scan lines, but it is still more real and direct than the Earthlights composite. - Solipsist 11:20, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Support. -Lommer | 08:53, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Oppose. Neutrality 06:53, Dec 27, 2004 (UTC)
- Support. Nice Dmn / Դմն 00:19, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Oppose. James F. (talk) 08:32, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Oppose Much too blurry to give me any pleasure - Adrian Pingstone 11:14, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Not retained as a featured picture: +5 / -7 - Solipsist 20:16, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)