Misplaced Pages

User talk:KyndFellow: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:32, 22 November 2006 editFred J (talk | contribs)16,207 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 03:16, 5 January 2007 edit undoKyndFellow (talk | contribs)519 edits →[] 
(43 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== ] ==
== Advocate ==
⚫ ]-] 09:30, 5 November 2006 (UTC)


This case is now closed and the results have been published at the link above.
Hi. My apoligize that I don't have the time to look through the entire discussion right now.


*] is indefinitely banned from editing ] and related articles as well as their talk pages. It is presumed that articles regarding any person, business or service or any accommodation or sex tourism destination mentioned on his websites are related articles, but the ban extends to all articles which relate to sexual services or sex tourism destinations.
Yet I want to give you this advice .
*KyndFellow, editing under any username or anonymous ip, is indefinitely placed on Probation. He may be banned from any article or talk page which he disrupts by aggressive biased editing.
*Content questions regarding the appropriateness of mention or links to the sites promoted by KyndFellow are not addressed; those questions being left to editorial discretion exercised in the normal course of editing.
*KyndFellow, should he violate any ban imposed under the terms of this decision, may be blocked for an appropriate period of time.
*Sock or meatpuppets which edit in the same manner and with the same themes as KyndFellow are subject to the remedies imposed on KyndFellow. Indefinite blocks may be imposed on aggressive socks. All blocks and bans to be logged at ].


For the Arbitration Committee --] 06:00, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
As your advocate, I would say that it wouldn't give much to go to arbitration, they are to be used as a last resort. I suggest you first start a ], either on the page or on the user in question. If you find the instructions complicated, contact me again and I'll help you.


: Hi.
May you could also try ]?
: Yes, you are banned from Sex tourism and its talk page. If you do it, you may be reverted and blocked...

: I think you can still collaborate with Devalover to improve the article, as long as you don't edit the article or its talk page.
]-] 05:12, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
⚫ : ]-] 13:35, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. Unfortunately, the commercial links/content you added {{#if:{{{1|}}}| to the page ] }} were inappropriate, as Misplaced Pages is an encyclopedia and should not be used for ] or a collection of ]. See the ] if you'd like to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thanks!<!-- Template:Spam0 --> ] 10:55, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

I am looking into the matter as we speak.

]-] 02:20, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Ok, thanks for your message.

It took me a while to formulate the message on the talk page of ]. I hope it is accurate.

]-] 02:32, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 03:16, 5 January 2007

Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Sex tourism

This case is now closed and the results have been published at the link above.

  • KyndFellow is indefinitely banned from editing sex tourism and related articles as well as their talk pages. It is presumed that articles regarding any person, business or service or any accommodation or sex tourism destination mentioned on his websites are related articles, but the ban extends to all articles which relate to sexual services or sex tourism destinations.
  • KyndFellow, editing under any username or anonymous ip, is indefinitely placed on Probation. He may be banned from any article or talk page which he disrupts by aggressive biased editing.
  • Content questions regarding the appropriateness of mention or links to the sites promoted by KyndFellow are not addressed; those questions being left to editorial discretion exercised in the normal course of editing.
  • KyndFellow, should he violate any ban imposed under the terms of this decision, may be blocked for an appropriate period of time.
  • Sock or meatpuppets which edit in the same manner and with the same themes as KyndFellow are subject to the remedies imposed on KyndFellow. Indefinite blocks may be imposed on aggressive socks. All blocks and bans to be logged at Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Sex tourism#Log of blocks and bans.

For the Arbitration Committee --Srikeit 06:00, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Hi.
Yes, you are banned from Sex tourism and its talk page. If you do it, you may be reverted and blocked...
I think you can still collaborate with Devalover to improve the article, as long as you don't edit the article or its talk page.
Fred-Chess 13:35, 4 January 2007 (UTC)