| Revision as of 17:58, 29 April 2019 editB-bot (talk | contribs)Bots532,577 edits Notification that File:Thenewmarketwizards.jpg is orphaned and will be deleted in seven days per WP:CSD#F5← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 06:31, 4 January 2025 edit undoGrorp (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users12,651 editsNo edit summary | ||
| (103 intermediate revisions by 46 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{User:Cirt/Quality improvement |
{{User:Cirt/Quality improvement}} | ||
| {{talkheader}} | {{talkheader}} | ||
| {{not around|3=24 April 2016}} | |||
| {{WikiProjectGATasks}} | {{WikiProjectGATasks}} | ||
| {| align=lef !important; | {| align=lef !important; | ||
| Line 28: | Line 27: | ||
| <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 16:10, 11 January 2018 (UTC)</small> | |||
| == Greetings and Salutations == | |||
| ] collection.|]] | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| : To ]: | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 02:47, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| : Hello! | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 23:01, 26 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| : Congratulations! | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 23:17, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| : You have been included in my first, and possibly only, Very Early Christmas List! | |||
| : As an earnest fellow believer in Santa Claus, and possibly in Our Redeemer Liveth as well, you may wonder how you got on this list. | |||
| : I have no idea! | |||
| : That's my story and I'm sticking to it. | |||
| : Unless I tracked down the connection in our user talk archives, in which case you know who you are! | |||
| : Or not. | |||
| : All the best for you and yours this Christmas 2018 and New Year 2019! | |||
| : – ] ] 02:35, 19 December 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ==Orphaned non-free image File:Market wizards.jpg== | |||
| ] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
| Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 17:47, 29 April 2019 (UTC) | |||
| ==Orphaned non-free image File:Thenewmarketwizards.jpg== | |||
| ] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
| Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 17:58, 29 April 2019 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 06:31, 4 January 2025
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| This is Cirt's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24Auto-archiving period: 3 months  |
| WikiProject Good Articles: Open Tasks This project identifies, organizes and improves good articles on Misplaced Pages. | |
|
|
| Good article criteria | Statistics | GAN Report | Changes log Nominations list | edit | |
Centralized discussion
|
|
AFD/T • T-7 • T-8 • T-2 • Relisted • AFDO • WP:DELSORT: Sexuality and gender, Law, Internet, News, Medicine • AFD tool links • WP:DRV • WP:MFD • AIV • RFUB • UAA/CAT • RFPP • PER • CSD • AB • FAR • FAC urgents • TFAR • RSN • BLPN • FTN • GAN Topic lists • Article alerts: Freedom of speech • Human rights • Journalism • Sexology and sexuality • LGBT studies • Feminism • Women • Gender Studies • Women artists • Women's History • Women scientists • Women writers • Medicine • Law • Internet • Internet culture • Comedy • U.S. Supreme Court cases
| ||||||||||
Shout out for Social Justice Warrior article
Hi Cirt, A quick note to say that I gave you a shout out for your work on the "Social Justice Warrior" Misplaced Pages article. My review of the article is part of the Wackipedia series on The Outline.
Wackipedia - Social Justice Warrior
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Stephenbharrison (talk • contribs) 16:10, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Portland Monthly
Portland Monthly has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:47, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Lobster (magazine)
Lobster (magazine) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 23:01, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for WSJ Magazine
WSJ Magazine has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 23:17, 1 January 2025 (UTC)