| Revision as of 20:25, 22 November 2006 editOmnilord (talk | contribs)141 edits Repaired some > with : and replied to WLU← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 03:36, 1 January 2024 edit undoZinnober9 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers51,391 editsm Fixed Lint errors on this page (table tag errors) | ||
| (78 intermediate revisions by 36 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{not around|3=29 July 2008}} | |||
| {{user WikiProject Sword of Truth}} | {{user WikiProject Sword of Truth}} | ||
| {{clear}} | |||
| ==T. Goodkind== | |||
| ==T. Goodkind== | |||
| I would like to extend a welcome. I see you have taken a good look at Goodkind’s page. Some good work I see. Although Terry has no Internet, he would like some to add some content and pertinent facts. Can you help? Mystar 05:12, 11 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| {| id="usertags" class="noprint" style="border: 1px solid #999; background: #fff; margin: 0 0 .5em 1em; text-align: center; padding: 5px; float: {{{float|right}}}; clear: {{{clear|right}}}; " | |||
| | | |||
| {|style="border:0px solid #e6e1ff; background-color:transparent;" align=right | |||
| |{{WM|center|User:Mystar|05}} | |||
| |} | |||
| |} | |||
| : I am giving you this award for your worka on the barnstar project. on Sword of truth. ] 02:43, 25 February 2007 (UTC) ] 02:43, 25 February 2007 (UTC) ] 02:43, 25 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| I would like to extend a welcome. I see you have taken a good look at Goodkind’s page. Some good work I see. Although Terry has no Internet, he would like some to add some content '''and''' pertinent facts. Can you help? Mystar 05:12, 11 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Sure, I'd love to help. I'm always looking to improve the status and quality of articles on Terry Goodkind and his books. Let me know what you need help with, and I'll see if I can be of assistance. - ] 14:40, 11 July 2006 (UTC) | :Sure, I'd love to help. I'm always looking to improve the status and quality of articles on Terry Goodkind and his books. Let me know what you need help with, and I'll see if I can be of assistance. - ] 14:40, 11 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ==Plot Introductions== | ==Plot Introductions== | ||
| Line 10: | Line 20: | ||
| Ok, take it easy. - ] 15:13, 6 September 2006 (UTC) | Ok, take it easy. - ] 15:13, 6 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| No offence, but the info contained within the Plot summery is fine, it is nothing more than would be found on any info site or any book description. They only give pertinent info and no spoilers. | No offence, but the info contained within the Plot summery is fine, it is nothing more than would be found on any info site or any book description. They only give pertinent info and no spoilers. | ||
| Line 35: | Line 44: | ||
| :Thanks alot. I'll send you one soon. ] 11:56, 7 September 2006 (UTC) | :Thanks alot. I'll send you one soon. ] 11:56, 7 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| == Bastique == | |||
| Hey Mystar, technically you didn't provide the information. I did. And thank you for the compliment on the T'lan Imass page. Feel free to add content if you've read the books.] 23:19, 22 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Ahhh well always looking for a way to break your word. I truly expected you to be a person who kept her word. I truly did. ANd I ''did'' provide you with proof... I gave you ''ONE'' of the names of the admins I spoke with. But we can ALL now see that you are not going to keep your word and just how good your word truly is. using a ploy like that is just bad form and weak.--] 01:25, 23 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | ==]== | ||
| The ] is now up and running. Thought you might like to know. It still has a long way to go before it'll look truly respectable, but it's a start. - ] 18:50, 25 September 2006 (UTC) | The ] is now up and running. Thought you might like to know. It still has a long way to go before it'll look truly respectable, but it's a start. - ] 18:50, 25 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| If you have something to discuss regarding page edits, please do so on talk pages of the articles, or on my own talk page. Using the edit summary gives me no chance to reply and does not allow you to disclose the full rationale for your edits. ] 18:13, 30 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == User notice: temporary 3RR block == | |||
| <div style="background-color: #f9f9f9; border: 1px solid red; padding: 3px;"> | |||
| ==Regarding reversions made on ] ] to ]== | |||
| {| class="user-block" | |||
| || ] | |||
| || You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the ]. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. | |||
| |}<!-- Template:3RR5 --> The duration of the is 12 hours. ] 09:13, 1 October 2006 (UTC)</div> | |||
| My dear Mr. Connolley, I offer up my sincere regrets. I see your point and I will take my medicine, as a man should. | |||
| After discussing it at length with several admins, I have come to see your point and heartily agree in my error. I was acting in Good Faith that what I saw as open contempt and vandalisms toward Terry Goodkind's page (see any contribs by WLU to assure your self of bad faith editing and edit warring), I was on the IRC channel while this was occurring and was asking for advise and help. Even they felt she was exerting overt ownership and was in the wrong. But that doesn’t make me right; I did err, and should be held accountable. I do appreciate your intervening and your insight. I am still relatively new to Misplaced Pages and not up to speed on all the guidelines and rules. I am learning and your efforts have added me in being a better editor. | |||
| Today I spend a great deal of time with a couple of admins and most notably ]. JWSchmidt, helped me get a clear picture of my actions and what things I can do in the future to circumvent such actions again. As I told the Admins on the channel, I'll not disagree or postulate any unfairness. I’m a grown man as I will stand up and take my medicine. I will also not speak to WLU's actions as they speak for themselves ass do her contribs, nor will I presume to hypothesize on WLU's current torrent of attacks. | |||
| I am sorry for my actions, and shall endeavor to try harder. | |||
| --] 00:54, 2 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == WLU's rant == | |||
| I guess youleave me no choice but to lower myself to your petty squable and post such thens as your attacks, bad faith, page ownership admissions, removing other posters comments etc. how truly OCD petty...--] 01:46, 9 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| This is not a rant, and this is not a petty squabble. This is the first step in a dispute mediation process in which both our conducts will be weighed against each other, and binding arbitration could result. I will end my request and not pursue this further if you stop stalking me and stop making tendentious, inflammatory edits. ] 03:02, 9 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Again kindly stop editing my talk page. You are wrong this is petty...on your part. Pot calling th eKettle black and all... While I am in no way completely innocent of past actions, they were in the past. I have conducted my actions with Good Faith, and most of them checking first with several Misplaced Pages people and admins before making them. Yeah I have proof don't worry :) | |||
| You have removed other users comments, edited in bad faith, owned pages and attacked me as well as admitted you having an agenda against Goodkind where you started all this crapola.. It really is in your contribs you cannot hide it. Removing other users commentaries is not a very good thing to do. | |||
| As I've said. Yours agenda is clear. You dislike Goodkind, haven't even read him, yet you feel totally knowledgeable in attempting to add content that you know nothing about. Simply allowing other to think for yourself and make your mind up for you. You read a rant and think it justified, when you haven’t even taken the time or initiative to verify it for yourself.... seems to me there is a huge problem with that. | |||
| OH your "BFF Terry" also didn't earn you and brownie points. It is attacks and aggressive name calling/smearing that marks your agenda clearly. | |||
| In the future please refrain from ugliness of that sort. It is very unbecoming of a lady. | |||
| In short, you may well try and get an action taken against me, but you are causing a great deal of exasperation along the way, simply because you have an agenda (your admission), which doesn’t bode well for your position. I’ve been editing in good faith. I’ve made some good edits, you simply cannot stand to have them stand is the problem. I happen to know a great deal of many herbal remedies. Your attack against me for taking an interest in that page is an attack and unwarranted. Things like trying to stir up trouble also go against Wiki policy. Trying to incite angst among users is a no no… so an admin just told me. That is not my problem. Page ownership is an overall Wiki problem. | |||
| I know I’ve been aggressive in the past, with good reason. One of them was banned, and as I’ve stated I’ve plenty of outside proof of planed attacks on TG’s pages as well as sources out side Wiki that specifically incite people to do what was being done. | |||
| BUT, my edits as of late are and have been good ones, and have also been discussed with seasoned Wikipedians before I made them. I spend a great deal of time on Misplaced Pages IRC discussing these things. I’d take a gooooood long look in the mirror | |||
| before I moved forward were I you. The pot calling the kettle black isn’t going to sit well with anyone. | |||
| Stop owning pages, stop with your agenda, be an honorable person of your word and act in good faith and we will be just fine. | |||
| The choice is yours. --] 03:33, 9 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hello, I'm sorry it's been awhile, and I'm not sure if all of you are still interested in formal mediation, but I recently agreed to mediate that case. Please either accept or reject me as a mediator there, and if you accept, please let me know if you would prefer public or ] mediation. If it's a stale issue, just say so. ] (]|]|]) 16:00, 14 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Back== | ==Back== | ||
| Hi Mystar, glad to see you're back. I don't think you've missed much (as you can tell, I haven't made almost any edits recently, 'cause I've been busy focusing on other things). Lunch would be nice - but unfortunately I live in Ann Arbor, not Lansing :-) - so it's kinda far for lunch. Thanks for the offer though - ] 01:41, 18 October 2006 (UTC) | Hi Mystar, glad to see you're back. I don't think you've missed much (as you can tell, I haven't made almost any edits recently, 'cause I've been busy focusing on other things). Lunch would be nice - but unfortunately I live in Ann Arbor, not Lansing :-) - so it's kinda far for lunch. Thanks for the offer though - ] 01:41, 18 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
| == Reply == | |||
| Though doubtless you'll either erase or edit my message, here's my reply to your thoughts. | |||
| :I find your apparent and unconcern for your misinformation sad. What you may not be aware of is that you so called "carefully referenced information" was in fact wrong. | |||
| == Thanks for your well wishes == | |||
| See, you say 'misinformation' and call my information wrong, yet you have yet to provide anything beyond your own experience to back it up. If my information is so wrong, so glaringly, obviously wrong, and you're not just bluffing, it should be pretty easy to find something to back up your assertion. | |||
| Hi there, I'm sorry for not responding earlier. Thanks for your well wishes, and also allow me to offer my condolences for your daughter. Thanks again, --] 02:15, 31 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :You continue to own pages where people constantly have to go behind you and fix your misinformation. | |||
| ==Smiley Award== | |||
| Actually Ron, I think the exact same thing about you. Generally in my efforts to fix the stuff you post I end up finding out something else useful to put up on the page that improves it, so it's not a lost cause, but it really does take time away from other things I'd rather be doing on Misplaced Pages. | |||
| Feel free to place this award on your user page, as a token of appreciation for your contributions. If you're willing to help spread the good cheer to others, please see the project page for the Random Smiley Award at: ] | |||
| :The sad part of it is that usually people walk away because they have lives and have no desire to get into an edit war...unlike you. | |||
| <div style="clear:right; float:right; width:300px; background-color:#f9f0C9; border: 1px solid #888850; padding:2px;">]<small>For your contributions to Misplaced Pages and humanity in general, you are hereby granted the coveted <b>]</b><br/>originated by ] <br/>(])</small></div> | |||
| Is this you being funny again? Do you see the contradiction here? We've both been tagged for breaking the 3 revert rule, and we've both reverted each other's edits on the Cat's Claw page what, twice today? Anything you accuse me of, you have done as well. Do you not see the contradiction? | |||
| --] <small>('']'')</small> 21:52, 31 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Again I'm asking you to stop your incessant edit warring and page owning. | |||
| ==Sword of Truth Wiki Invite== | |||
| You mean like replacing the reference in a scholarly, peer-reviewed journal where it discusses the involvement of Cat's Claw in kidney failure? I think that's a whole lot more useful than a general warning that CC should be used with caution like other herbals. If you have a reason to remove the reference, please let me know what it is. That's the thing I find most frustrating about trying to edit with you, you never seem to justify yours. I can't even argue with you 'cause usually the most I've got to go on is stuff like "I talked to Terry and he said it was so." How is anyone supposed to build consensus or a verifiable entry with that? | |||
| Thanks for the invite. I have joined the SOT wiki project. I will do what I can to improve the pages, mostly with plot summaries / character pages. ] 23:03, 20 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :You mock what is for me and many people who suffer with Lupus the fact that taking the wrong things can indeed kill. Placing incorrect information can lead to many kinds of adverse reactions. | |||
| ==AfD notice== | |||
| One would hope Misplaced Pages would be a starting point, not a final diagnosis. I also think the warning about kidney failure is sufficient to dissuade people from going to the herbal section rather than the doctor. Again, a reason to keep that particular information in. | |||
| I notice that you have edited the Sword of Truth pages, and are a member of the Sword of Truth project; as such, I felt that you should know that the pages are currently being considered for deletion ] | |||
| :How sad for you that you make a mockery of such things. As I so stated on the talk page I show your information to be incorrect. | |||
| And it was voted a Speedy Keep! ] 05:27, 27 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Um, no you didn't unless I missed something. You put up that quote that said CC has been used to treat a whole list of conditions, of which SLE was one of them. I don't know how that contradicts my point that manufacturers claim it can be used to treat SLE. Seems to support it, unless there is a subtle point I'm missing. | |||
| ==]== | |||
| :Lupus and Lupus SLE are two different things and require differing methods. And then we have the fact that you are adding needless Information and information that has already been placed. | |||
| This arbitration case has closed and the decision is available at the link above. {{user|WLU}} and {{user|Mystar}} are prohibited from interacting with each other or commenting on each other, directly or indirectly, on any Misplaced Pages page, and may be blocked for up to one week for each violation. For the purpose of this remedy, any edit by either WLU or Mystar to one of the articles over which they had previously been in conflict (including, but not limited to, ] and ]) shall be considered an interaction with the other party. For the arbitration committee, ] 12:33, 23 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| See, the thing is every time I look for lupus, what comes up is SLE. When people refer to lupus, they seem to be referring to SLE. I realize there's five kinds of lupus on Misplaced Pages alone and a bunch of other ones on the Internet, but it seems that Lupus=SLE for the most part. Perhaps you should create pages discussing the more specific aspects of whatever lupus you are talking about that isn't SLE, drug-induced Lupus Erythematosus, Lupus nephritis, Lupus pernio,or Lupus vulgaris, the five kinds that are currently on wikipedia. I'm too busy trying to find time to edit the Steven Erikson articles. And in response to your concrete comment about Lupus not equalling SLE, I altered the link so now the article on CC links specifically to SLE, the type of lupus referenced in the weblink that says CC was used to treat SLE. Specific feedback I will edit for, but as heartfelt as your electronic sighs seem to be, they are less convincing than a web article with a references section. I'm not sure what your academic background is, but mine leans heavily towards double-blinded placebo trials (and qualitative research oddly enough). | |||
| == Thanks == | |||
| :Anyone who comes in behind you and fixes anything, your ego will not allow it to stand, No you have to go reedit in a lame attempt to show your page ownership. | |||
| Thanks for your welcome and helpful links. I appreciate it. ] 07:20, 27 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Um, I think you'd find that rather inaccurate, if you check my contributions, which you apparently seem to do. I generally have issues with your edits since they seem to be pretty spiteful and not particularly helpful (by the way, will you '''PLEASE''' correct the damage to the lupus article? There are still two treatment sections, and I don't know the difference between "Known Treatment" and (regular?) "Treatment". The introduction of the page is designed to provide a brief preview of the rest of the article - there should be no information there that's not in the main body. You breaking it up into two sections just messes it up. That is "Lupus Erythematosus" specifically). If I owned pages, I would have re-worked that one months ago. | |||
| == ] == | |||
| :Providing correct and pertinent information is not a frivolous endeavor. As I have said in the past. | |||
| I just wanted to inform you that stubbiness of an article isn't a particularly good deletion argument, and the band clearly passes WP:MUSIC, as it has members from a number of famous, notable bands-<span style="font-family:stop; color:purple;">K</span>]<span style="font-family:stop; color:blue;">ng</span>]]] 03:47, 28 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| I think you need a comma splice in there, not a period. | |||
| == Have a good time == | |||
| :People use Misplaced Pages as research for their well-being and better health ....not just for facts. | |||
| I hope you have a good time at your summit. Hit me up when you get back, I have some ideas for a trans-wiki of Ice and Fire material that might also pertain to the Sword of Truth articles (and would get us both out from under wikipedia's rules.) ] 03:11, 2 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Misplaced Pages (and research in general) should be a collection of facts. Specific research should also include interpretation, Misplaced Pages should not. People may be using wikipedia for info regarding health, so I '''left in the section about how Cat's Claw might have caused kidney failure''' for that reason. That's a sore point, and one of the reasons I suspect and correct your edits. | |||
| :I'm sorry this relpy is so late in coming. As I was talking about before there was some discussion about taking the more superfluous Ice and Fire articles and moving them to a private wiki. We were going to tras-wiki them over to a dedicated wiki but the request was denied. I have some hope that this will change in the near future but if not there has been talk of hosting the software and domain by the folks. The main benefit to doing this is that we would be able to get as crufty and indepth with the material as we wanted to and we wouldn't be constrained by the vast host of rules that govern fictional (or any other) material here at wikipedia. | |||
| :All this got me to thinking that you too might want to consider doing the same with the Sword of Truth material. I know that you admin/own the terrygoodkind.net site and so it would be really easy for you to host your own wiki over there! You and whom ever else you want could be the administrtors, you could set up your own rules and could restrict or open the ability to edit the wiki to a few people or anyone that would want to edit. The standard just requires registration which would make it easier to curb vandalism. | |||
| :You need to behave and take this seriously. | |||
| :If I remember correctly there is already a Sword of Truth "themed" wikia over at wikia.com but I'm not sure who runs it, you migh want to get in touch with him, or just host one yourself. Anyway my plan was to try and get all the Song of Ice and Fire pages with the exception of the main ] article and all the individual novel pages trans wikied. Then we would just link to the seperate wiki in the external links sections of these articles. Hit me up and tell me what you think of the idea (both for Ice and Fire and Sword of Truth) when you get some time. Feel free to do so either on my talk page or personal email, whatever is easier for you. Cheers. ] 14:47, 20 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| You need to play fair, which means saying, for real, why, with references or at least justification, why you make the changes you do, if they are being contested. That's why I spend the time on the talk pages. Also, it's Misplaced Pages, it's fun, and it's publically editable. Half the changes on the site involve the word penis for God's sake. You can't take it that seriously. | |||
| :With such things as medicine, herbal remedies, homeopathic remedies, such information is too valuable to treat in such a silly manor as you do. Yes people’s lives do depend on such PROPER information. | |||
| == Confessor == | |||
| I would think that people's lives depend on their doctors mostly. I would not expect someone with lupus (again, Lupus erythematosus) to solely use wikipedia for diagnosis and treatment. Misplaced Pages should be a starting point for research (hence the references), not a finishing point. I edit in the manner that I do so my information is justified and verfiable, which I do not think of as silly. Again, I would categorize many of your edits as spiteful. But why should we be the ones to decide, let's take it up with arbitration? Since you feel so strongly that you are in the right, you should have no problem with this. Now, I'm expecting you to delete this right away (thank God again for diffs and history) without a reply, because I don't think there's much you could say. Go ahead. I'll be posting it on my page as well. | |||
| Heyyy thanks for the message. Yeah I'm a big fan of Goodkind... a new one, I'll admit, but I'm very compelled by the philosophy and have been forced to reconsider my opinion on Ayn Rand. hahaha. Yeah, I'm currently in the middle of Naked Empire. I'm seriously thinking about NOT reading Chainfire untill Confessor is out... so far the cliffhangers and such and just the general way the story compells me has been managable because I can always get the next book, and I won't have that luxury at the end of Phantom! | |||
| <br><br> | |||
| Thanks for your kind words, I know I'm pretty bad, hahaha, I just copied a lot of the coding from the other books' pages and filled in the proper info. Glad to know more experienced types are around to make everything right. | |||
| <br><br> | |||
| Anyway, see ya around the pages! | |||
| <br>--] 09:09, 22 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Come on man == | |||
| Thanks for not calling me a girl, and generally items such as this should be posted on user talk pages, not discussion. | |||
| Please don't edit the SoT main page, I don't want anything to blow back up esp after the ArbCom case. If you need some minor changes made or anything I'll be more than happy to make them for you. Still waiting to hear back on the Transwiki deal too. Take care. ] 16:43, 27 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ] 20:19, 17 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Actually the SOT page is well within my right to edit. As it was stated, I will refrain from the TG page. I clarified this with the arbcom team. As the SOT page was not in the area of contention, as well as WLU openly stating she/he had no problem with my editing that page. | |||
| Last time I waste my time with you…. Again leave me out of your delusional witch-hunts | |||
| As for the Transwiki thing, I'm all for it. I've only had limited access as of late due to my heavy travel schedule. I just finished up my last speaking engagement for a bit, so I'll have more time to devote to working on it. ] 01:31, 29 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Huh? What are you talking about? | |||
| :Okay, I had been under the impression from the ArbCom that the SoT main page was also included. There is no really stress on getting anything moved ''now'' so no worries about getting anything done right away. I'll talk to you about it when you get some extra time, later. ] 05:40, 29 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| You edit in bad faith and have a serious problem. | |||
| == Thanks == | |||
| :Specifically... what pages, what edits? I just don't know what you are talking about because your only rationalization is during your edit summary, which is often too general for me to respond to specific points. For instance, in the Cat's claw article, you talk about a "nonworking" reference. The reference works, it's just in paper. Go to a university library and look it up, or check it out on Google scholar. Because I'm a student I have access to many, many more on-line journal articles than most people, and that's what I use when I'm referencing. Assuming I edit in bad faith simply because it is me contravenes the fact that I'm actually referencing my changes. I'm not doing it willy-nilly, I'm basing it on what I can find in scholarly secondary peer-reviewed publications. | |||
| Thanks for your comments. I know what you mean about work, I have just had to finish up a few big projects, which has kept me, unfortunatly, occupied. I have begun to write up new pages for Kahlan and Richard Rahl, and will post them soon so they can be edited/torn apart. I cant decide wether to simply edit and update the existing pages on the characters and leave them where they are, or rewrite them and add them to the all encompassing characters page. Any thoughts? ] 14:59, 24 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Let me explain…Wiki is not your soapbox and is not here to allow you to try and teach “ME” a lesion that you think I need. Sadly you are the one with the problem. You carry on about how my edits are causing your stress and your stomach to knot up.. That would be “your” problem not mine. I suggest you find another fixation to nit pick and leave me the hell alone. | |||
| ==Back== | |||
| They make me angry because you never, ever justify what you do, you just do it. Please, engage in a dialogue, we can find common ground in understanding why each other does what they do. Right now all I can see is that you seem to be spitefully editing my contributions because you don't like me, ''because you never say WHY you make the changes you do''. | |||
| Yup, I'm back. I probably won't be as active as I was once upon a time, but I'll be around to help with minor cleanups and projects. - ] 17:08, 6 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| You started out harassing me, by your OWN admission. I find it laughable (as do many others) that you want me banned… Soooo you are hard at work trying to provoke me and twist my words in a lame attempt at such a stupid goal. Good God get a grip girl! | |||
| :Uh, already clarified I'm not female, so please respect my statement of gender. I'm not twisting your words, 'cause you never say anything substantial. | |||
| ::This is the first time I've seen you clarify that little gender aspect and I've been following this thing all along. | |||
| Editing IS a serious thing AND a privilege! You again make a mockery of it. Misplaced Pages is not here to force me to interact with you. | |||
| :No, but if we are editing the same pages, particularly if you stalked me to a page you have never touched before (eccentric contraction, Cat's claw, Barbara Hambly for three), you are forced to interact with me if you make contentious edits. | |||
| “WLU-See, you say 'misinformation' and call my information wrong, yet you have yet to provide anything beyond your own experience to back it up. If my information is so wrong, so glaringly, obviously wrong, and you're not just bluffing, it should be pretty easy to find something to back up your assertion.” | |||
| WOWZERS!!!! Yet my edits are the ones correcting you and providing PEOPLER information. Take Lupus SLE…for instance… I had to correct the PROPER information and you refused to allow it to stand… When it is the proper information and reference. I call that backing it up dudette! I’m also chuckling at your obtuse attempt at calling me wrong, when your own words proved me correct. The information refer to it as SLE deal with it or nor I don’t care. I do care that the info is correct and proper. | |||
| :What proper information? I'm pretty sure if you had a reference, I'd let it stand. I've got years of training writing referenced scientific papers, so if you've got actual references to backup what you are saying, I should leave it alone. Specifics please. Again, male, not female. Your sentence "The information refer to it as SLE deal with it or nor I don’t care. I do care that the info is correct and proper" seems to imply that you don't care if the information refers to SLE or another type of lupus, as long as it backs up what you consider proper information. This disturbs me, as the corollary implies that you would rather have information you believe to be true posted rather than information written by researchers be posted. That's pretty much completely contrary to the principles of wikipedia, and essentially makes it your soapbox. | |||
| You started out attacking me on Goodkind’s pages and you also got called out for a lame attempt at removing talk page info… AND because I edited GRRM’s pages… I laugh because even your buddies called my edits GOOD ONES! J How about that… Yes it only enraged you further to taunt me more… As can be seen in your own admission ad harassing me. | |||
| :When did I remove talk page info? When I was archiving? That information was all in the archive, I didn't remove it. Also, you've removed or altered information I've posted on the talk pages more than once. I have diffs if you'd like to see them. And if your information on the GRRM page is still up, that's cause they're worthwhile, but if I keep changing other stuff you put up, it's 'cause it doesn't make sense, it contradicts my references, or the article itself, or a simple logical deduction (such as your constant edits regarding SLE versus Lupus versus Systemic Lupus Erythematosus). Also, I don't have any buddies on GRRM's page, the only person I really have interacted with at length is Crawdad, Moody, maybe Werthead. | |||
| ::I'm not 100% sure, but I think that was not directed at you WLU, but rather NeoFreak. | |||
| “WLU- I would think that people's lives depends on their doctors mostly. I would not expect someone with lupus (again, Lupus erythematosus) to solely use wikipedia for diagnosis and treatment. Misplaced Pages should be a starting point for research (hence the references), not a finishing point”. | |||
| Yes indeed! BUT as I have been to many many Lupus support Groups and contiue to interact with them. BUT that is as much of my priviet life as I will allow. | |||
| :So we agree, people should not use wikipedia as their only source of information, only as a starting point. I'm not sure what relevance your discussion of support groups provides. | |||
| You keep babbeling about “arbitration”. I’m amused. If you feel you need help I encourage you to seek it both here and professionally in your home town. Seeing as you seem to be unable to handle someone correcting your edits and unable to admidt errors as well. Arbitration is not going to be several people telling you what you want to hear. | |||
| :Arbitration can result in either or both of us being banned from editing wikipedia, temporarily or indefinitely. No professional help involved. I don't have a problem with people correcting my errors, if they can find them. Arbitration could have negative affects on both of us, so I'm following the proceedures I should, including mediation. Should mediation fail and you keep acting as you are, then I'll talk to arbitration. But before they even look at my/our case, they have to be sure I've tried mediation. Hence the dialogue and mediation posting under both our names on the mediation page. | |||
| ::again, I ask, why are you still so keenly interested in a topic you have admited you loath and know next to nothing about outside the first book? | |||
| By your own admission | |||
| “WLU to Omnilord- | |||
| '''I want to see Mystar banned''' 'cause he's been wikistalking me, 'cause he doesn't engage in actual discussion with anyone who disagrees with him, 'cause he uses wikipedia policies punitively (and improperly), ''''cause he's generally a crappy editor and 'cause he's generally disruptive.''' You could argue the same about me, but I don't think this holds in recent months. Anyway, I'm happy enough if he just ameliorates his conduct to civil and reasonable. '''As for wanting TG shamed, I'd say I've downgraded to wanting at least the fact that his books involve strong and explicit violence, torture, etc.''' It was my main reaction to reading WFR, and the reason I stopped reading at that point”. | |||
| From . | |||
| :Ever think about or wonder why I wrote that, why I might think that? Part of it goes back to my constant desire to understand why you make the changes you do, which you never discuss. Also, is it so unreasonable to want posted on the Sword of Truth page the mention of torture? I mean come on, 80 pages alone in WFR of him being beaten on, that's not something you want an 8 year old reading, is it? And, have you not wikistalked me in the past? Have you not had '''many''' people point out these things before? Incidentally, I altered the diff to be a link, it's more compact. Feel free to change it back. | |||
| ::There is nothing against informing article reads that the books are intended for a mature audience. What is being disputed is the underhanded method of trying to insert a negative bias because of the content and taking the content at face value or out of context without giving any credit to the meaning of it. The 80 pages of torture had a grand total of about 2-3 pages of anything gory. The rest was describing the psychology of what happens to a person who is tortured. In the story, it was used to show that sometimes people who inflict pain do so because they were driven mad by pain, driven so insane that they would be able to torture another human. It was also used to show that there is evil in the world, that good people can do evil deeds, and that evil deeds have consequences. | |||
| ::What you and those like you have been trying to do is make it sound like the books are all about graphic torture and sexual sadomasochism. That is flat out and entirely incorrect information which you are most certifiably NOT -BY YOUR OWN ADMISSION OF NOT READING THE BOOKS AFTER WIZARD's FIRST RULE- qualified to make judgement calls on nor should you be editing until you have a solid understanding of the material you are attempting to make more encyclopedic because by doing so you may inadvertantly change the meaning of the article, or worse, as has been seen in the past, purposely change it to have a nagative bias. | |||
| ::Again, familiarize yourself with the full scope of the material and don't edit until you do. | |||
| See you’re the one with the problem… not me. Your own witch-hunt is disgusting. | |||
| ==AfD nomination of ]== | |||
| WIkipedia police is to edit! BOLDLY! I've done that. Misplaced Pages is not your soapbox to call me a "crappy editor" | |||
| ]An article that you have been involved in editing, ], has been listed for ]. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:adw --> ] (]) 17:16, 20 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ] 02:12, 21 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Minor edits == | |||
| :If you want to actually discuss with me, I'll give you the diffs and places that I base my statement on, I'll tell you why I thought it was a bad edit, and you can tell me why you thought it was a good one. And if you've got problems with mine, we can do the same. It'll be a dialogue. ] 19:15, 22 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| I noticed some recent changes you made to the article ] which, though they significantly changed the content of the paragraph, were marked as minor edits. Please reserve use of the minor edit checkbox for spelling, grammar, and punctuation fixes, layout changes, adding links, or other changes '''which do not change the meaning of the text.''' Marking major edits as minor is considered poor etiquette, and may cause some editors to take offense. See ] for more information. While I do not disagree with the changes you made, you should keep this in mind to avoid any problems in the future. I have made a ] to be sure anybody watching the page has a chance to review your changes. Have a nice day! ] 20:20, 4 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thats the other thing, stop typing to sound like you're riding on a high horse, it is extremely condesending and is half the reason you and other like NeoFreak get almost no respect from people like mystar. ] 20:25, 22 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == |
== Invitation == | ||
| {| class="messagebox standard-talk" cellpadding="5" style="background-color:#ffffff; padding: 0.5em; border: 2px solid #aaaaaa; -moz-border-radius:20px;" | |||
| |- | |||
| | style="width:90px;" | ] | |||
| | <big>'''WikiProject Objectivism'''</big><br />Salutations, {{BASEPAGENAME}}. I notice you were once a participant in the inactive ] and I am excited to inform you that I have resuscitated the project. I was not active in the original project, so your experience and ideas would be most valuable. If you're interested in taking part, please consider changing your inactive status in the ] and joining the discussion on the ].<br/> | |||
| Yours in enlightened self-interest, ] 00:52, 15 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| |{{shortcut|WP:A=A|WP:AYN|WP:RAND}} | |||
| |- | |||
| |} | |||
| ==]== | |||
| It is with great trepidation that I even reply to you as most exchanges we've had in the past were less than constuctive. I'm not going to argue that validity of my 3RR entry as that will be decided there or the "bad faith" editing accusations because that's an argument that is going no where. As for the "long standing version" you are almost correct. The old version of the Goodkind page had the phrase in question removed for the same reasons I removed it this time. This version was accepted by everyone (check history and Talk logs) as acceptable. Not until I deployed for about a month was this phrase put back in. I took this corrective action after I got back by changing it back to the agreed upon version. The logs speak for themselves. ] 22:15, 21 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| No where near as funny as ], but does it deserve to be deleted? -] (]) 21:39, 10 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==An Invite to join Novels WikiProject== | |||
| I've re-read the 3RR rules and you are in fact correct about the 3RR rules, my apologies. Still I'm letting my report stand for reasons you can see on the report board. ] 22:22, 21 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| <div style="margin: 0.5em; border: 2px lightsteelblue solid; background: whitesmoke; padding: 1em;" > | |||
| {| | |||
| |- | |||
| |] | |||
| Hi, you are cordially invited to join the ]! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of topics related to fiction books often referred to as "Novels". We make no length distinction so all narrative prose fiction is of interest. This includes Novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories. Articles about the works themselves and the forms and genres. | |||
| |- | |||
| {{#if:Steven Erikson, The Sword of Truth| | |||
| {{!}}As you have shown an interest in ''']''' we thought you might like to take an interest in this well established WikiProject. | |||
| }} | |||
| |- | |||
| {{#ifeq:|yes| | |||
| {{!}}You might like to take an extra interest in our ''']''' | |||
| }} | |||
| |- | |||
| {{#ifeq:|yes| | |||
| {{!}}You might like to take an extra interest in our ''']''' | |||
| }} | |||
| |- | |||
| {{#ifeq:|yes| | |||
| {{!}}You might like to take an extra interest in our ''']''' | |||
| }} | |||
| |- | |||
| {{#ifeq:|yes| | |||
| {{!}}You might like to take an extra interest in our ''']''' | |||
| }} | |||
| |- | |||
| {{#ifeq:yes|yes| | |||
| {{!}}You might like to take an extra interest in our ''']''' | |||
| }} | |||
| |- | |||
| {{#ifeq:|yes| | |||
| {{!}}You might like to take an extra interest in our ''']''' | |||
| }} | |||
| |- | |||
| {{#ifeq:|yes| | |||
| {{!}}You might like to take an extra interest in our ''']''' | |||
| }} | |||
| |- | |||
| {{#ifeq:|yes| | |||
| {{!}}You might like to take an extra interest in our ''']''' | |||
| }} | |||
| |- | |||
| {{#ifeq:|yes| | |||
| {{!}}You might like to take an extra interest in our ''']''' | |||
| }} | |||
| |- | |||
| {{#ifeq:yes|yes| | |||
| {{!}}You might like to take an extra interest in our ''']''' | |||
| }} | |||
| |- | |||
| {{#ifeq:|yes| | |||
| {{!}}You might like to take an extra interest in our ''']''' | |||
| }} | |||
| |- | |||
| |We look forward to welcoming you to the project! ] (]) 18:05, 20 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| </div> | |||
| == ''Atlas Shrugged'' Article == | |||
| My response to you | |||
| Hello! As a member of Wiki Project Objectivism would you please see ] on the excessive coverage of fictional technology, etc. in ''Atlas Shrugged'' and my proposal to replace it with more coverage of the meaning of the events in that novel. Thanks. —] (]) 03:44, 7 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| The sad fact is that I did violate the 3RR. I was wrong and I did apologize. I also explained myself and took my punishment like a man, as I was wrong. But as is Neofreak's fashion he uses past mistakes as a tool to try and beat down people with them. Sad indeed. | |||
| Early on I edited his precious A song of Ice and Fire pages. They were good edits and his fellows even said so, yet Neofreak felt it nessary to retaliate and that he did. | |||
| == ] == | |||
| To that end we have since set up a Misplaced Pages project and it is going well. Sadly Neofreak feels it is nessary to pop in from time to time and revert something adding chiding remarks like “fanboy” to illicit retaliation. The fact is that we have a consensus on the terminology he keeps trying to remove what he doesn’t like. That being anything he thinks that puts Goodkind in a positive light. The wording he keeps removing is sourced, factual and proper. It was agreed upon by consensus and it has stood for some time. | |||
| I am clearing the participant list at ] due to inactivity. Please add yourself again if you want to participate. --] (]) 22:20, 23 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| My edits have been in good faith and my long past attitude toward spite removed. | |||
| As anyone reading my contribs can see I edit in good faith and with proper referenced material. I cannot help it if two wikistalkers are out to get me and they will do everything they can to make me look bad. Again fact is I edit as per protocols BOLDLY! And that is not a crime. Defending my work is not a crime. I never have any problems save with Neofreak and one other user. So to say I’m a bad person as Neofreak does would be a lie | |||
| == Trackers Task Force == | |||
| {{mbox|image=]|text= | |||
| Well it is all to clear that NeoFreak has an issue the real problem is that it is with anyone who disagrees with him. Neofreak started editing Goodkind's pages in retaliation to an edit or two I made on his beloved A song of Ice and Fire, even his associates said they were good edits. So Neofreak mad a mad plunge into edit warring on the Goodkind pages..,but I digress... | |||
| Hello, Mystar! I'd like to invite you to join the ]. If you are interested in ] series The Trackers, you are perfect for this Misplaced Pages Project! Just add your name to the ] to join! The task force is under construction, so maybe you can help. Goodbye!!! ] (]) 22:48, 22 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| }} | |||
| == ] == | |||
| We have a Wiki project for these pages and are working to bring them into better standing. Neofreak is aware of this and as you can see has not joined. The wording we have has been there for a while and was agreed upon by consensus. It is all to clear in reading Neofreak's past contribs to these Goodkind pages he has a burr under his bonnet about Goodkind (as do a few ASOIAF fans) and as such seeks out every opportunity to disrupt the work being done and then also spits out a word or two like the "fanboy" comment trying to illicit retaliatory warring. | |||
| I seek only to correct what we have as agreement with other people on the project. To that end Neofreak is the one who was the vandal.] 22:56, 21 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :Are you talking to me or did you just want this rant on the record? ] 01:09, 22 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692013717 --> | |||
Latest revision as of 03:36, 1 January 2024
 | This user may have left Misplaced Pages. Mystar has not edited Misplaced Pages since 29 July 2008. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
 | This user is a member of the Sword of Truth task force. |
T. Goodkind
| |||||||
- I am giving you this award for your worka on the barnstar project. on Sword of truth. Smith Jones 02:43, 25 February 2007 (UTC) Smith Jones 02:43, 25 February 2007 (UTC) Smith Jones 02:43, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
I would like to extend a welcome. I see you have taken a good look at Goodkind’s page. Some good work I see. Although Terry has no Internet, he would like some to add some content and pertinent facts. Can you help? Mystar 05:12, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- Sure, I'd love to help. I'm always looking to improve the status and quality of articles on Terry Goodkind and his books. Let me know what you need help with, and I'll see if I can be of assistance. - Runch 14:40, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
Plot Introductions
Hi Mystar, I see you've been rewriting the plot introductions to the books in the SoT series. I'm not questioning the factual validity of your edits (after all, I have a feeling you know the series much better than I do), but I do think that in several instances you put too much information in the intros. After all, the introduction is supposed to give the reader a very general idea of the novel without (ideally) giving away any plot details from the novel itself. In that sense, I think the general gist of the original plot intros may have been better (in some instances).
That being said, when I have a chance, I might try and trim down some of the sections you've written to try and keep the sections accurate while removing anything that might be construed as "spoilers". It might take me a few days to get around to it though, I've been pretty busy lately.
Ok, take it easy. - Runch 15:13, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
No offence, but the info contained within the Plot summery is fine, it is nothing more than would be found on any info site or any book description. They only give pertinent info and no spoilers.
HOWEVER!!! The rest of the pages are abysmal! Sorry to have to say it, but the book plot summaries are so full of misinterpretation and supposition/conjecture they need to be redone. I've already started and will be doing all of them, so that they will reflect proper information and not people assuming that this or that happened.
I will be up front and lay it out, the people placing the whole criticism thing in Naked Empire and Pillars, are in the minority. They only so called criticism calling it too "preachy" are a select few. You will not find that on any professional review, nor will you find it on any thing other than a select few other authors message boards. I simply will not allow such smearing attempts to succeed. We can state the reality of the content and that it has some long discourses from Richard helping the Bandakar to understand what they are misunderstanding, and some directives of understanding to help the reader better understand and grasp the contextual inference of the book. We can make statements without using words that are placed there to demoralize someone reading it in an attempt to dissuade them from reading it and to pre condition them to what they would read. Further, it is acceptable to place information to assist a reader, but not to make up the mind of the one looking for information.....as we have seen.
As I've said, I've several pages of info and content from several people stating the fact they are openly asking people to make such posts on Goodkind's Wiki page, and egging them on. Not to mention these same people suggesting that negative content be placed etc. All you gotta do is ask. Mystar 22:57, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
- Just please keep in mind that they need to be written in an encyclopedic tone. This is not a fansite or an advertisement page. Please see the pillars of creation page for more information and links. NeoFreak 06:43, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
It is written as such. But also keep in mind that it needs to be written and worded properly.Mystar 11:29, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
- Can I email you about that stuff you gathered together for me? NeoFreak 11:32, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
indeed. mystar@chartermi.net
Mystar 11:38, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks alot. I'll send you one soon. NeoFreak 11:56, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Sword of Truth
The Sword of Truth WikiProject is now up and running. Thought you might like to know. It still has a long way to go before it'll look truly respectable, but it's a start. - Runch 18:50, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
Back
Hi Mystar, glad to see you're back. I don't think you've missed much (as you can tell, I haven't made almost any edits recently, 'cause I've been busy focusing on other things). Lunch would be nice - but unfortunately I live in Ann Arbor, not Lansing :-) - so it's kinda far for lunch. Thanks for the offer though - Runch 01:41, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for your well wishes
Hi there, I'm sorry for not responding earlier. Thanks for your well wishes, and also allow me to offer my condolences for your daughter. Thanks again, --Kyoko 02:15, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Smiley Award
Feel free to place this award on your user page, as a token of appreciation for your contributions. If you're willing to help spread the good cheer to others, please see the project page for the Random Smiley Award at: User:Pedia-I/SmileyAward
originated by Pedia-I
(Explanation and Disclaimer)
--TomasBat (Talk) 21:52, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Sword of Truth Wiki Invite
Thanks for the invite. I have joined the SOT wiki project. I will do what I can to improve the pages, mostly with plot summaries / character pages. Aericanwizard 23:03, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
AfD notice
I notice that you have edited the Sword of Truth pages, and are a member of the Sword of Truth project; as such, I felt that you should know that the pages are currently being considered for deletion MPoint
And it was voted a Speedy Keep! Mystar 05:27, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/WLU-Mystar
This arbitration case has closed and the decision is available at the link above. WLU (talk · contribs) and Mystar (talk · contribs) are prohibited from interacting with each other or commenting on each other, directly or indirectly, on any Misplaced Pages page, and may be blocked for up to one week for each violation. For the purpose of this remedy, any edit by either WLU or Mystar to one of the articles over which they had previously been in conflict (including, but not limited to, Terry Goodkind and Lupus Erythematosus) shall be considered an interaction with the other party. For the arbitration committee, Thatcher131 12:33, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for your welcome and helpful links. I appreciate it. Appleworm 07:20, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Sethian (band)
I just wanted to inform you that stubbiness of an article isn't a particularly good deletion argument, and the band clearly passes WP:MUSIC, as it has members from a number of famous, notable bands-K@ngie 03:47, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Have a good time
I hope you have a good time at your summit. Hit me up when you get back, I have some ideas for a trans-wiki of Ice and Fire material that might also pertain to the Sword of Truth articles (and would get us both out from under wikipedia's rules.) NeoFreak 03:11, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- I'm sorry this relpy is so late in coming. As I was talking about before there was some discussion about taking the more superfluous Ice and Fire articles and moving them to a private wiki. We were going to tras-wiki them over to a wikia dedicated wiki but the request was denied. I have some hope that this will change in the near future but if not there has been talk of hosting the software and domain by the westeros folks. The main benefit to doing this is that we would be able to get as crufty and indepth with the material as we wanted to and we wouldn't be constrained by the vast host of rules that govern fictional (or any other) material here at wikipedia.
- All this got me to thinking that you too might want to consider doing the same with the Sword of Truth material. I know that you admin/own the terrygoodkind.net site and so it would be really easy for you to host your own wiki over there! You and whom ever else you want could be the administrtors, you could set up your own rules and could restrict or open the ability to edit the wiki to a few people or anyone that would want to edit. The standard just requires registration which would make it easier to curb vandalism.
- If I remember correctly there is already a Sword of Truth "themed" wikia over at wikia.com but I'm not sure who runs it, you migh want to get in touch with him, or just host one yourself. Anyway my plan was to try and get all the Song of Ice and Fire pages with the exception of the main A Song of Ice and Fire article and all the individual novel pages trans wikied. Then we would just link to the seperate wiki in the external links sections of these articles. Hit me up and tell me what you think of the idea (both for Ice and Fire and Sword of Truth) when you get some time. Feel free to do so either on my talk page or personal email, whatever is easier for you. Cheers. NeoFreak 14:47, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Confessor
Heyyy thanks for the message. Yeah I'm a big fan of Goodkind... a new one, I'll admit, but I'm very compelled by the philosophy and have been forced to reconsider my opinion on Ayn Rand. hahaha. Yeah, I'm currently in the middle of Naked Empire. I'm seriously thinking about NOT reading Chainfire untill Confessor is out... so far the cliffhangers and such and just the general way the story compells me has been managable because I can always get the next book, and I won't have that luxury at the end of Phantom!
Thanks for your kind words, I know I'm pretty bad, hahaha, I just copied a lot of the coding from the other books' pages and filled in the proper info. Glad to know more experienced types are around to make everything right.
Anyway, see ya around the pages!
--DragonGuyver 09:09, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Come on man
Please don't edit the SoT main page, I don't want anything to blow back up esp after the ArbCom case. If you need some minor changes made or anything I'll be more than happy to make them for you. Still waiting to hear back on the Transwiki deal too. Take care. NeoFreak 16:43, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Actually the SOT page is well within my right to edit. As it was stated, I will refrain from the TG page. I clarified this with the arbcom team. As the SOT page was not in the area of contention, as well as WLU openly stating she/he had no problem with my editing that page.
As for the Transwiki thing, I'm all for it. I've only had limited access as of late due to my heavy travel schedule. I just finished up my last speaking engagement for a bit, so I'll have more time to devote to working on it. Mystar 01:31, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- Okay, I had been under the impression from the ArbCom that the SoT main page was also included. There is no really stress on getting anything moved now so no worries about getting anything done right away. I'll talk to you about it when you get some extra time, later. NeoFreak 05:40, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for your comments. I know what you mean about work, I have just had to finish up a few big projects, which has kept me, unfortunatly, occupied. I have begun to write up new pages for Kahlan and Richard Rahl, and will post them soon so they can be edited/torn apart. I cant decide wether to simply edit and update the existing pages on the characters and leave them where they are, or rewrite them and add them to the all encompassing characters page. Any thoughts? OptumusPatronus 14:59, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
Back
Yup, I'm back. I probably won't be as active as I was once upon a time, but I'll be around to help with minor cleanups and projects. - Runch 17:08, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Confessor (Sword of Truth)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Confessor (Sword of Truth), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Confessor (Sword of Truth). Thank you. Freederick (talk) 17:16, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Minor edits
I noticed some recent changes you made to the article The Sword of Truth which, though they significantly changed the content of the paragraph, were marked as minor edits. Please reserve use of the minor edit checkbox for spelling, grammar, and punctuation fixes, layout changes, adding links, or other changes which do not change the meaning of the text. Marking major edits as minor is considered poor etiquette, and may cause some editors to take offense. See Help:Minor edit for more information. While I do not disagree with the changes you made, you should keep this in mind to avoid any problems in the future. I have made a dummy edit to be sure anybody watching the page has a chance to review your changes. Have a nice day! Dansiman 20:20, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Invitation
.jpg)
|
WikiProject Objectivism Salutations, Mystar. I notice you were once a participant in the inactive WikiProject Objectivism and I am excited to inform you that I have resuscitated the project. I was not active in the original project, so your experience and ideas would be most valuable. If you're interested in taking part, please consider changing your inactive status in the list of participants and joining the discussion on the talkpage. Yours in enlightened self-interest, Skomorokh 00:52, 15 June 2008 (UTC) |
Shortcuts |
May contain nuts
No where near as funny as The Truth, but does it deserve to be deleted? -HarryAlffa (talk) 21:39, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
An Invite to join Novels WikiProject
 Hi, you are cordially invited to join the Novels WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of topics related to fiction books often referred to as "Novels". We make no length distinction so all narrative prose fiction is of interest. This includes Novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories. Articles about the works themselves and the forms and genres. |
| As you have shown an interest in Steven Erikson, The Sword of Truth we thought you might like to take an interest in this well established WikiProject. |
| You might like to take an extra interest in our Fantasy task force |
| You might like to take an extra interest in our Sword of Truth task force |
| We look forward to welcoming you to the project! Alan16 (talk) 18:05, 20 February 2009 (UTC) |
Atlas Shrugged Article
Hello! As a member of Wiki Project Objectivism would you please see my post on the excessive coverage of fictional technology, etc. in Atlas Shrugged and my proposal to replace it with more coverage of the meaning of the events in that novel. Thanks. —Blanchette (talk) 03:44, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Objectivism
I am clearing the participant list at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Objectivism due to inactivity. Please add yourself again if you want to participate. --Karbinski (talk) 22:20, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
Trackers Task Force
 | Hello, Mystar! I'd like to invite you to join the Trackers Task Force. If you are interested in Patrick Carman's series The Trackers, you are perfect for this Misplaced Pages Project! Just add your name to the support list to join! The task force is under construction, so maybe you can help. Goodbye!!! Hidividedby5 (talk) 22:48, 22 June 2010 (UTC) |
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)