| Revision as of 02:34, 23 November 2006 editDavidRF (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,573 edits →Haydn Symphonies← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 23:18, 2 May 2024 edit undoMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,133,055 edits →Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C: new sectionTag: MassMessage delivery | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Message | |||
| Deja Messages Ici Bitte | |||
| | bgcolor = #gray | |||
| | border-color = #black | |||
| | color = #black | |||
| | linkcolor = #orange | |||
| }} | |||
| {{TOCleft}} | |||
| -------------- | -------------- | ||
| {{archivebox| | |||
| #] | |||
| #] | |||
| #] | |||
| #] | |||
| #] | |||
| #] | |||
| #] | |||
| #]}} | |||
| == January 2023 == | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| == Thank You == | |||
| ] Thank you for ] to Misplaced Pages. It appears that you copied or moved text from ] into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Misplaced Pages's content, here or elsewhere, ] does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Misplaced Pages, this is supplied at minimum in an ] at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and ] to the copied page, e.g., <code>copied content from <nowiki>]</nowiki>; see that page's history for attribution</code>. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{tl|copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at ]. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-copying --> ] ] 14:32, 3 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
| I appreciate your reply, and I have posted a deletion review. I am trying to remain alot calmer now, and will handle this issue through the proper channels. This was just one of many things that was hampering my various projects this week. So I have been on edge a bit about them. Thanks again --] 19:09, 1 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::Hey thanks for the warm welcome. It's nice to meet someone here who realizes that I am more than some guy trying to spam his project. It gets pretty old talking to people that treat me like a 12 year old (and are more than likely younger than me anyways). I do have one question though, about how long do deletion reviews take to be resolved usually? Thanks again, and I'll try my best to contribute as much usefull info as I can to the articles I take interest in. --] 18:02, 2 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] moved to draftspace == | |||
| == Appologies == | |||
| Thanks for your contributions to ]. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because '''it has no sources'''. | |||
| My appologies for the caps. I tried to get a deletion review, but couldn't figure out how to post it? I'm sure this doesn't matter to you, but imagine how upset you would be if you spent the last three years creating a new genre of music, to not only be disrespected, but outright ripped off. On top of that have a bunch of people on wikipedia tell you that what you have spent years creating is not notable because it doesn't meet the notability guidelines set by wikipedia. And the main reason was because of the fact that I choose to give away my music, and concentrate on the art of actually creating art, instead of dealing with record labels (who will try to screw me at every given opportunity). So according to these "notability" guidelines, I will never be a notable artist? Yet I can have my very ideas ripped off, and the bands that do it have valid wikipedia pages? So yeah imagine how pissed off that would make you? --] 10:15, 1 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while. | |||
| Please see more information at ]. | |||
| == OH HELL NO!! == | |||
| When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ] (]) 19:20, 6 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| HOW DARE YOU!!! You deleted links to the article Vernian Process in the List of Steampunk works article, by claiming they were SPAM... Yet those links were originally posted there by someone who had nothing to do with that project. In fact the only reason I created a wiki article for that project was because I saw that someone else had mentioned my project their first! So how can you possibly call that SPAM?? Not to mention the fact that there are a number of bands in that list that have nothing to do with the Steampunk genre. Yet they are still linked. In fact V.P. was the very first Steampunk oriented music project. | |||
| <blockquote>'''Unsourced with unclear claim to notability.'''</blockquote> | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| == AN/I discussion becoming more about you == | |||
| Hello again... I know I've already told you about this, but ] is becoming more and more about you, and I wanted to make sure that you have a chance to speak your mind there. Just making sure :). ] ] 16:00, 28 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| == About the Daniel Zimmerman Article == | |||
| Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 19:29, 6 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
| While I am not discussing that article any more on that discussion page, I did want to bring this to your attention. ] - I would argue that the page meets the first 2 criteria (of which only one has to be true to be considered to be important enough for inclusion). This article expands on both the ] and the ] notable alumni pages. Articles that meet the importance guidelines are not required to have the subject be "notable". I acknoledge my ignorance on the guidelines about writing articles pertaining to myself and appologize to the Wiki community for doing so. ] 17:49, 28 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message == | |||
| == Thanks! == | |||
| Aw, shucks. Thanks a million, mate. Are you leaving? We wish you'd stay... ] ] 01:58, 30 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| ==]== | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">]</div> | |||
| What was that about? - <b>]</b><small> ]/]/]</small> 00:44, 3 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| :Left a message at ] - <b>]</b><small> ]/]/]</small> 02:00, 3 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| ::Response there as well. - <b>]</b><small> ]/]/]</small> 03:02, 3 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| == Wow! == | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small> | |||
| Your page was vandalized, check it out. The modifications made were not consistent with the interpretation of your name in Greek, and were therefore reverted! :-) ] <sup><font size="-2">] ] ]</font></sup> 21:18, 12 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| </div> | |||
| ==]== | |||
| </div> | |||
| Thanks for your note. Problem is, I think that the Bayreuth circle is a non-topic, hence my edits. There was no organisation as such. The term was originally used in respect of the audiences at Bayreuth at the end of the 19th century, espcially perhaps in respect of the original subscribers to Wagnerˇs project. Then Nazi propagandists used the term in an updated sense to promote Hitler as a leader of German culture. Then Holocaust industry historians seized on this latter use. It is all a lot of fuss about nothing, or at most about a group of almost non-entities. In my view, it doesn´t even deserve a Misplaced Pages article....I only made my edits when my suggestion to delete the article was voted down.....--] 13:55, 23 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2023/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1187131902 --> | |||
| : Many thanks for your further comments - but I have more than enough on my plate at present without becoming an administrator! Basically I suggest the article should be rewritten so as to distinguish between the 'Bayreuth Circle' as: | |||
| :* a casual name used by cultural historians for supporters of Bayreuth in the last years of the 19th century | |||
| :* an informal name used by cultural historians to refer to Winifred Wagner and her personal circle of friends and relatives | |||
| :* a term used by Nazi propagandists to enable them to place Hitler in the 'inner circle' of German culture by playing on his acquaintance with Winifred Wagner and her family | |||
| :* a term used by holocaust industry historians, often confusing the three above uses, as 'evidence' to link Wagner with Hitler and vice versa. | |||
| :*(and there may be some other definitions as well....) | |||
| == Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C == | |||
| :I am up to my eyeballs at present with academic and professional work. However if you or others wish to commence rewriting the article I will be very glad to comment/contribute. All best regards --] 17:05, 24 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| <section begin="announcement-content" /> | |||
| ==], ]== | |||
| :''] '' | |||
| Please do not resort to bad faith personal attacks on AfDs. I do not want to go into mediation over this. ] <sup>(])</sup> 16:52, 8 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *This is regarding the ] ]. ] <sup>(])</sup> 17:52, 8 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| **No, it doesn't help, because while I informed editors of similar articles about the AfD to see what they might think, I did not contact parties outside of Misplaced Pages, which is what is in question right now. ] <sup>(])</sup> 19:43, 8 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Dear Wikimedian, | |||
| ==]== | |||
| Both ] and I seem to think that if the articles are radically shortened and put in a ] (per ] for lesser important characters), there'd be no need for deletion. I'd even be willing to do the grunt work. Would you please return to the deletion debate and consider changing your vote? - ]|] 09:27, 23 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process. | |||
| == ] == | |||
| This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the ] to learn more about voting and voter eligibility. | |||
| Hi. I see you've weighed in on this AfD. I just noticed that ] has substantially cleaned up the article, and I think ] is worth another look. Regards, ] 06:33, 15 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please ]. | |||
| ==Citations, citations== | |||
| Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well. | |||
| In view of what your robust comments ] (salutes are rare and very welcome!), you might be interested to see ]. We read: ''If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact us on the Good Article project ] or you may contact me personally''; I've already done the latter. -- ] 08:48, 26 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| On behalf of the UCoC project team,<section end="announcement-content" /> | |||
| == GAs == | |||
| ] 23:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Hi Eus, | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:RamzyM (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=Universal_Code_of_Conduct/Coordinating_Committee/Election/2024/Previous_voters_list&oldid=26721206 --> | |||
| Frantic with real-world work at the moment, so just sneaking in a bit of WP here and there. GA sucks, I'm afraid, and there's a concern among a number of people that it dilutes the few editorial/review resources we have away from the only processes (IMV) that really matter: FAC, and FAR/C. Perhaps PR too, but it's moribund, isn't it. | |||
| I'd prefer to end the GA thing altogether: it just doen'st mean much, and if it's made to mean something, it will duplicate the FA process. | |||
| Perhaps we need a page with advice on referencing ....? It seems to be a weeping boil at the moment. ] 01:49, 29 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| The article about ] may have been unclear about when the school opened, but I edited the article to make it clear that the school is already open, albeit at a temporary location. It will move to the groups of the university in 2007. Could you please take another look at ] ? --] (] | ] 06:50, 2 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == RfA thanks == | |||
| {| style="border:1px solid black; background:#dfe8fe; padding:3px;" align=center | |||
| |] | |||
| | Thank you for participating in my ], which passed with a tally of '''66/11/5'''. I learned quite a bit during the process, and I expect to be learning a lot more in the days ahead. As I stated in the request itself, I respect your decision to oppose me based on my short tour of duty, but I hope I can earn your trust. I will be taking things slowly (and doing a lot of re-reading), but please let me know if there is anything I can do to improve in my new capacity. -- ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 13:55, 6 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| == A Tree Full of Secrets == | |||
| I prodded ] for two reasons. The first is that bootlegs are generally considered to lack the notability for an article. Yes, I agree that Pink Floyd had a lot of great ideas and songs that never made it onto albums. These are worth noting and discussing on WP. But articles about bootleg albums are about bootleg albums, not about the material they contain. "Tree" is not the first bootleg to compile PF rarities, and it wont be the last. The second reason I prodded the article is that besides a tracklist, it's devoid of any useful information. If the article explained the sources and history of the material to any degree, I would have a harder time deciding to prod it (as I did with ], for example). BTW, thanks for going through the prods. I occasionally do, but it can be tedious. I also prodded several more bootlegs that day; several others I just added to . You might find it worthwhile to go through those. Cheers --] 11:51, 13 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Yeah, it's hard to tell on those. They all have some degree of notability, but only because each is tangentially related to another band or artist. I think merge tags might be more appropriate. The articles are well written, I just can't imagine people reading about, for example, ] unless they're looking for the history of ]. -] 12:09, 13 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| Please review this newest AfD, your opinion would be appreciated. ] <sup>(])</sup> 00:42, 18 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Thank you == | |||
| My administratorship candidacy succeeded with a final tally of 81/0/1. I appreciate your support. Results are at ]. Warmly, ''']''' 02:50, 18 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| I believe the decision to delete this article was made in error, so I have asked for a ]. Since you were involved in the AfD on this, I wanted to inform you so that you might weigh in. ] <sup>(])</sup> 17:30, 19 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Haydn Symphonies == | |||
| OK. I like the idea of a template. I reformatted 83 and 88-96 to match your stuff. One question, at what point does the harpsichord & continuo become an anachronism for the scoring and should no longer be included (with the exception of #98's throwback in the finale)? ] 04:28, 22 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :OK. I finished 97-104 just now. I think there are a few earlier ones that could use the reformatting as well, but I'll leave that to you. ] 02:34, 23 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 23:18, 2 May 2024
| Please leave a new message. |
 Archives |
January 2023
Thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages. It appears that you copied or moved text from Jean Jullien into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Misplaced Pages's content, here or elsewhere, Misplaced Pages's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Misplaced Pages, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from ]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Misplaced Pages:Copying within Misplaced Pages. Thank you. /wiae /tlk 14:32, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Allgemeine Literatur-Zeitung moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Allgemeine Literatur-Zeitung. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. FuzzyMagma (talk) 19:20, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Christian Friedrich Michaelis (philosopher)
The article Christian Friedrich Michaelis (philosopher) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unsourced with unclear claim to notability.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:29, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C
- You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.
This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.
The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.
Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.
On behalf of the UCoC project team,