Misplaced Pages

:Requests for checkuser/Case/GuardianZ: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser | Case Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:31, 24 November 2006 editThatcher (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users28,287 edits →Oroboros 1: closed← Previous edit Latest revision as of 21:32, 10 February 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(21 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<noinclude> <!-- BEGIN ARCHIVE TEMPLATE --><noinclude>
<!-- <!--
If you are adding a new request for this user please add it above this notice at the top of the page. Only the latest request will appear on the checkuser page. Please don't create a separate page with a different name. If you are adding a new request for this user please add it above this notice at the top of the page. Only the latest request will appear on the checkuser page. Please don't create a separate page with a different name.
Line 7: Line 7:
|} |}
<div style="background: #f5fffa; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px;"> <div style="background: #f5fffa; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px;">
<center>''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a ]. <font color="red">'''Please do not modify it'''</font>.</center> <div style="text-align:center;">''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a ]. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it'''</span>.''</div>
<!-- END ARCHIVE TEMPLATE -->


=== GuardianZ ===
{{rfcu box|case=GuardianZ|filed=20:01, 18 August 2007 (UTC)}}
* {{checkuser|GuardianZ}}
<!-- Do not edit the top two lines. Add suspected sock puppets and IP addresses below this line -->
* {{checkuser|Ebonyskye}}
* '''Code letter:''' B

I suspect ] has evaded an ] by editing as ]. After concluding that GuardianZ edits with a negative bias towards Midnight Syndicate, the arbitration decision banned GuardianZ from editing any articles related to ] or ] and Ebonyskye has edited both articles as well as adding significant content to ], an article about a Nox Arcana release. She has added original research to the Darklore Manor article accusing Midnight Syndicate of copying a Nox Arcana album concept. The writing style (comments on talk pages and edit descriptions) of the two users is also very similar. Also, she’s just edited the ] article in a way which, consistent with her edits as GuardianZ, shows a clear bias towards Joseph Vargo of Nox Arcana. - ] 20:01, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

{{declined}} The edit's by GuardianZ are stale. ''']''' 19:20, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
:I don't really understand this decision and am thinking that I may not have explained myself properly. ] is barred from editing any articles related to ] or ] through a ] by the arbitration committee. While she is no longer active as GuardianZ, I believe she has created a new user name, ], to circumvent this arbitration decision. I thought that a checkuser was the appropriate place to determine if they are the same person. If a checkuser is not appropriate, is there somewhere else I should be reporting this? Thank you, ] 20:53, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

If the pattern of edits is such that you are pretty sure it's the same person, try reporting your information (you'll need to supply a pattern as above, preferably with a few more diffs, not just an allegation) at ]... ordinary disruptive users would be reported at ] or ] ++]: ]/] 22:38, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
:Thanks, Lar. I ended up filing a report at ] and got the result I was expecting - Ebonyskye is a new incarnation GuardianZ. - ] 02:11, 23 August 2007 (UTC)



=== GuardianZ ===
* {{checkuser|GuardianZ}}
<!-- Do not edit the top two lines. Add suspected sock puppets and IP addresses below this line -->
* {{checkuser|Peacekpr}}
* {{checkip|66.213.21.32}}
* {{checkip|68.9.37.233}}

* '''Code letter:''' F

I suspect ] has evaded a block by editing as ]. On November 20 it was confirmed that ] is ] and they were blocked for sockpuppetry and disruption of the ] article.

On November 21 the ] account was created. Several hours later ] made his/her first edit, an investigation into ]. All of ]'s edits have been involving the ] content dispute case, it seems that this account was created for a sole purpose. If ] is truly ], then he/she has violated Misplaced Pages policy by evading a block. ] 02:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

{{inconclusive}} ] (]:]) 16:27, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

'''Does this mean I am cleared of the charges?''' I did not have a sockpuppet, not Oroboros or Peacekpr and have been trying for a week to login, and my IP has never changed. Dionyseus just placed a notice on my user page that I was a "proven" sockpuppet, and this says otherwise. ] 14:54, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
:No, these are two seperate cases. This case was a request to check to see if you were ]. The result of that check was "inconclusive". ] 15:09, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Well, I wasn't asking you ]. I would like a re-check. As I said my IP has never changed and I do not have any other user account. Plus Oroboros signed in under a different IP , which you and Skinny tried to hide by "archiving" the page. ] 08:02, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
:That's a lie, ] removed your message and warned you not to continue evading your block. ] 08:09, 30 November 2006 (UTC)


=== Oroboros 1 === === Oroboros 1 ===
Line 33: Line 73:
{{confirmed}} ] Co., ] 22:00, 20 November 2006 (UTC) {{confirmed}} ] Co., ] 22:00, 20 November 2006 (UTC)


<center>''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. <font color=red>'''Please do not modify it.'''</font></br>Subsequent requests related to this user should be made ''above'', in a new section.</center></div> <div style="text-align:center;">''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span><br />Subsequent requests related to this user should be made ''above'', in a new section.''</div></div>
</br> </br>
</noinclude> </noinclude>

Latest revision as of 21:32, 10 February 2023

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser/Case/GuardianZ}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.


GuardianZ

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch
Filed: 20:01, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

I suspect GuardianZ has evaded an arbitration decision by editing as Ebonyskye. After concluding that GuardianZ edits with a negative bias towards Midnight Syndicate, the arbitration decision banned GuardianZ from editing any articles related to Midnight Syndicate or Nox Arcana and Ebonyskye has edited both articles as well as adding significant content to Darklore Manor, an article about a Nox Arcana release. She has added original research to the Darklore Manor article accusing Midnight Syndicate of copying a Nox Arcana album concept. The writing style (comments on talk pages and edit descriptions) of the two users is also very similar. Also, she’s just edited the Dungeons & Dragons (album) article in a way which, consistent with her edits as GuardianZ, shows a clear bias towards Joseph Vargo of Nox Arcana. - Skinny McGee 20:01, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

no Declined The edit's by GuardianZ are stale. Voice-of-All 19:20, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

I don't really understand this decision and am thinking that I may not have explained myself properly. GuardianZ is barred from editing any articles related to Midnight Syndicate or Nox Arcana through a decision by the arbitration committee. While she is no longer active as GuardianZ, I believe she has created a new user name, Ebonyskye, to circumvent this arbitration decision. I thought that a checkuser was the appropriate place to determine if they are the same person. If a checkuser is not appropriate, is there somewhere else I should be reporting this? Thank you, Skinny McGee 20:53, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

If the pattern of edits is such that you are pretty sure it's the same person, try reporting your information (you'll need to supply a pattern as above, preferably with a few more diffs, not just an allegation) at Misplaced Pages:Suspected sock puppets... ordinary disruptive users would be reported at WP:AN/I or WP:3RR ++Lar: t/c 22:38, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, Lar. I ended up filing a report at WP:AE and got the result I was expecting - Ebonyskye is a new incarnation GuardianZ. - Skinny McGee 02:11, 23 August 2007 (UTC)


GuardianZ

  • Code letter: F

I suspect User:GuardianZ has evaded a block by editing as User:Peacekpr. On November 20 it was confirmed that User:GuardianZ is User:Oroboros_1 and they were blocked for sockpuppetry and disruption of the Midnight Syndicate article.

On November 21 the User:Peacekpr account was created. Several hours later User:Peacekpr made his/her first edit, an investigation into User:SkinnyMcgee. All of User:Peacekpr's edits have been involving the Midnight Syndicate content dispute case, it seems that this account was created for a sole purpose. If User:Peacekpr is truly User:GuardianZ, then he/she has violated Misplaced Pages policy by evading a block. Dionyseus 02:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

 Inconclusive Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 16:27, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Does this mean I am cleared of the charges? I did not have a sockpuppet, not Oroboros or Peacekpr and have been trying for a week to login, and my IP has never changed. Dionyseus just placed a notice on my user page that I was a "proven" sockpuppet, and this says otherwise. GuardianZ 14:54, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

No, these are two seperate cases. This case was a request to check to see if you were User:Peacekpr. The result of that check was "inconclusive". Dionyseus 15:09, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Well, I wasn't asking you Dionyseus. I would like a re-check. As I said my IP has never changed and I do not have any other user account. Plus Oroboros signed in under a different IP , which you and Skinny tried to hide by "archiving" the page. GuardianZ 08:02, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

That's a lie, User:khoikhoi removed your message and warned you not to continue evading your block. Dionyseus 08:09, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Oroboros 1

  • Code letter: C, E

I suspect both User:Oroboros_1 and User:GuardianZ are the same person. They are edit warring on the Midnight Syndicate article, both trying to push a Joseph Vargo promo. In the article's talk page, apparently Oroboros_1 forgot to sign in and replied using the 68.9.37.233 IP address. 68.9.37.233 then noticed that she was not signed on, so she edited out the IP address and replaced it with her username 'Oroboros_1'. On November 10, GuardianZ edits the article with the edit summary "adding footnotes in support of statements. correcting quotation marks. combining duplicate references (print with web links))". The article was reverted, and then GuardianZ forgot to log in and as IP address 68.9.37.233 she reverted the article with the edit summary "My footnotes for references re-added, minus reference to people, but with statements cited. PS. Skinny, please use talk page for all future dialog."

3RR diffs:

GuardianZ, 22:27, November 16, 2006

GuardianZ, 23:50, November 16, 2006

GuardianZ, 05:56, November 17, 2006

Oroboros_1, 17:37, November 17, 2006 Dionyseus 20:30, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

 Confirmed The Uninvited Co., Inc. 22:00, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.