Misplaced Pages

:Requests for checkuser/Case/PANONIAN: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser | Case Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:36, 26 November 2006 editDaniel (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators75,502 edits →PANONIAN: -cat← Previous edit Latest revision as of 21:44, 10 February 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(9 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<noinclude>
<!--
If you are adding a new request for this user please add it above this notice at the top of the page. Only the latest request will appear on the checkuser page. Please don't create a separate page with a different name.
-->
{| class="messagebox"
| style="text-align: center" | If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add </br><span style="font-size: 125%">'''<nowiki>{{</nowiki>{{FULLPAGENAME}}<nowiki>}}</nowiki>'''</span></br> to the checkuser page . Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on ] (but will still appear here).
|}
<div style="background: #f5fffa; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px;">
<div style="text-align:center;">''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a ]. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it'''</span>.''</div>
=== PANONIAN === === PANONIAN ===
* {{checkuser|PANONIAN}} * {{checkuser|PANONIAN}}
Line 17: Line 26:
PANONIAN has apparently left wikipedia (). However, as there have been death threats, I think this checkuser should still be done. We need to know who is going around threatening to execute people. --] 22:47, 25 November 2006 (UTC) PANONIAN has apparently left wikipedia (). However, as there have been death threats, I think this checkuser should still be done. We need to know who is going around threatening to execute people. --] 22:47, 25 November 2006 (UTC)


<s><tt><nowiki>{{Declined}}</nowiki></tt>, only because we don't have an <tt><nowiki>{{unnecessary}}</nowiki></tt> template.</s> {{unnecessary}}. If the IPs are going around making death threats, block them until hell freezes over. If users are making death threats, ditto. If blocking the IPs doesn't stop the accounts, then come back here and ask us to block the IPs used by the accounts. <span style="font-family: Verdana">] ]</span> 00:51, 26 November 2006 (UTC) <s><code><nowiki>{{Declined}}</nowiki></code>, only because we don't have an <code><nowiki>{{unnecessary}}</nowiki></code> template.</s> {{unnecessary}}. If the IPs are going around making death threats, block them until hell freezes over. If users are making death threats, ditto. If blocking the IPs doesn't stop the accounts, then come back here and ask us to block the IPs used by the accounts. <span style="font-family: Verdana">] ]</span> 00:51, 26 November 2006 (UTC)


:First three (PANONIAN + 212.200.175.214 / 212.200.175.59) was edit warring with me, broke the 3RR (here: , , , , , , ), and it is obvious, that they are the same person in reality (for ex: ). :First three (PANONIAN + 212.200.175.214 / 212.200.175.59) was edit warring with me, broke the 3RR (here: , , , , , , ), and it is obvious, that they are the same person in reality (for ex: ).
Line 24: Line 33:


I see PANONIAN's recent quit only a way (trick?) to avoid blocking. --] <sup>] :-)</sup> 01:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC) I see PANONIAN's recent quit only a way (trick?) to avoid blocking. --] <sup>] :-)</sup> 01:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Only CheckUser can show whether those IPs were really used by PANONIAN or they simply joined in. The most recent edit war between VinceB and PANONIAN has been here for a while. Without any evidence from CheckUser, it is very rude to say that a user with a record of 27,114 edits since 2004 and six barnstars "wrote death threats" or that he broke 3RR. ] 04:38, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
:::He broke 3RR once before. And I may suggest you to read some of his first edits, back in 2004. What you listed here are just aggravating circumstances, and makes the question even bigger, that how could this happen. Anyway, I'm not struggling with ] :)--] <sup>] :-)</sup> 14:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
A checkuser is necessary to determine who made the death threats. We've blocked the IP addresses and disposable accounts, we still need to block the main account of whoever it was. We can't do that without a checkuser. --] 13:10, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

{{Unrelated}}. No evidence of PANONIAN on any of those IPs. <span style="font-family: Verdana">] ]</span> 11:39, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
<div style="text-align:center;">''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span><br />Subsequent requests related to this user should be made ''above'', in a new section.''</div></div>
</br>
</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 21:44, 10 February 2023

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser/Case/PANONIAN}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

PANONIAN

  • Code letters: A, E

Just see IP's contribs. We have a dispute about this. IP is Serbian, and simply reverting my contribs to PANONIAN's versions, several times this means the 4th revert to that version. Vince 15:23, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

It is more than obvious, even if the IP's does not match with PANONIAN, that they are sock- or meatpuppets of him, since it (they) simply continued the edit war, what PANONIAN started by reverting. No such "coincidences" happen. And I had some death sentences (15:42 & 15:59) immediately after I asked for this checkuser at 15:23. --Vince 16:32, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Comment: As noted, WhiteEagleSerbianPride and the IP's have been announcing "death sentences" against editors. Recommend priority attention. Newyorkbrad 18:30, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

PANONIAN has apparently left wikipedia (). However, as there have been death threats, I think this checkuser should still be done. We need to know who is going around threatening to execute people. --Tango 22:47, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

{{Declined}}, only because we don't have an {{unnecessary}} template. no Unnecessary. If the IPs are going around making death threats, block them until hell freezes over. If users are making death threats, ditto. If blocking the IPs doesn't stop the accounts, then come back here and ask us to block the IPs used by the accounts. Essjay (Talk) 00:51, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

First three (PANONIAN + 212.200.175.214 / 212.200.175.59) was edit warring with me, broke the 3RR (here: , , , , , , ), and it is obvious, that they are the same person in reality (for ex: same edit within' 30 min).
Plus: 212.200.175.122 is in the same range as the other two IPs, and it had the same edit, as WhiteEagleSerbianPride (talk · contribs) - so I'm pretty sure, that all of these are the same, so this literally means, that PANONIAN was the one, who wrote death threats to me, so by yr logic he should be blocked indef. --Vince 01:24, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

I see PANONIAN's recent quit only a way (trick?) to avoid blocking. --Vince 01:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Only CheckUser can show whether those IPs were really used by PANONIAN or they simply joined in. The most recent edit war between VinceB and PANONIAN has been here for a while. Without any evidence from CheckUser, it is very rude to say that a user with a record of 27,114 edits since 2004 and six barnstars "wrote death threats" or that he broke 3RR. Tankred 04:38, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

He broke 3RR once before. And I may suggest you to read some of his first edits, back in 2004. What you listed here are just aggravating circumstances, and makes the question even bigger, that how could this happen. Anyway, I'm not struggling with editcountitis :)--Vince 14:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

A checkuser is necessary to determine who made the death threats. We've blocked the IP addresses and disposable accounts, we still need to block the main account of whoever it was. We can't do that without a checkuser. --Tango 13:10, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Red X Unrelated. No evidence of PANONIAN on any of those IPs. Essjay (Talk) 11:39, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.