User talk:Morton devonshire: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 07:59, 27 November 2006 view sourceMONGO (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers76,644 edits Arbitration← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 17:10, 28 August 2024 view source MKsLifeInANutshell (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users2,127 edits Notification: listing of The Whole Experience at WP:Articles for deletion.Tag: Twinkle
(792 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{pp\|small=y}}
	<div id="title-override" class="topicon" style="font-size: 188%; padding-top: 0.5em; padding-bottom: 0.1em; float: left; position: absolute; left: 0.5em; top: 1px; width: 90%; background: {{#ifeq:{{PAGENAME}}\|{{FULLPAGENAME}}\|white\|#F8FCFF}}; display:none">Mad Dog Devonshire's talk, ''''']'''''</div>
			{{not around\|date=November 2007}}
	{{User:Morton_devonshire/Head}}
			==My work here is done==
	{{clear}}
			]
			Aye, I've been dodging the conclusion for months. Tweaking the PrisonPlanet.com people kept me in the game, but I can't avoid it anymore: There's just not much Wiki-violatin' vanity-conspiracy-spamology left to delete! I leave it to you all to monitor for the time being -- I'm going on an indefinite Wikibreak, and moving on to more productive enterprises. See you all at the Grove! Cheers to all of you, on both sides of the rabbit hole -- it's been a real pleasure. Call me on the Bat Phone if anything comes up. </font><small><span style="border: 1px solid #F06A0F">]]</span></small><span style="color:#ffffff;"> · </span> 19:11, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
			:Sad to see you go. You take care man! It has been an interesting venture with you here. Peace to you good friend. ] <small>]/]</small> 19:17, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
			:You've done work to be proud of. Take care, ] <sup>]</sup> 01:28, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
			::I hope you can be productive. ] (]) 00:32, 20 December 2007 (UTC)


			Hey Morton,
	<div class="NavHead" style="-moz-border-radius-topright: 10px; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 10px; background: #8FBC8F; text-align: center; padding: 2px; font-size: 120%;"><font face="trebuchet ms" color="#2F4F2F">]'s talk page</font></div>
			just thought you might like to see this piece on you taken from prisonplanet.com;

			You're famous dude!--] (]) 01:51, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
	'''''<big>Please ]. To make a new section, click , or just add a section to the <big>bottom</big> of the page. Remember to use a meaningful header.</big>'''''

			Hey Morton! What have you been up to? Been keeping up with the Joneses? ] (]) 02:38, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
	{\| style="text-align:center; border: 1px solid #000000; background-color:#F8EFFF"
	\|- padding:1em;padding-top:0.5em;"
	\|style="font-size: 85%"\|'''This is a Wi<!-- Misplaced Pages -->kipedia user talk page.'''
	If you find this page on any site other than Wi<!-- Misplaced Pages -->kipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated, and that the user this page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wi<!-- Misplaced Pages -->kipedia itself. The original page is located at http://en.wiki<!---->pedia.org/User_talk:Morton_devonshire.
	\|]
	\|}

			::You go, I'm back. Have fun in the Grove. Say hi to Hilary for me. ;)
	<table style="margin-bottom: 0.5em; margin-top: 10px; border: #3D9140 solid 1px; -moz-border-radius: 10px; background: #E0EEE0;">
			::But seriously, I wonder what really keeps you ticking. Do you really believe you did the right thing?  ] ♫☺♥♪ <small>]</small> 19:18, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
	<tr><td><div style="padding: 8px;">
	<div style="width: 200px; font-size: 96%; float: right; margin-left: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px; background: #8FBC8F; padding: 4px; border: 1px solid #3D9140; -moz-border-radius-topright: 10px; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 10px;">
	<div style="background: #E0EEE0; padding: 1px; -moz-border-radius-topright: 10px; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 10px; text-align: center; margin-bottom: 4px;">Contents</div>
	<div style="<!-- should be added once 15 topics are created height:300px; -->width: 200px; overflow: auto;">
	__TOC__</div></div>

			:In case you ever eventually read this: I didn't know you at the time but you seem to have been doing awesome work. I also borrowed and adapted (and adopted) ], then ] inspired from material on one of your pages. Who knows, maybe other people will also use them in your memory. I hope you're doing well, —]] – 11:22, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
	==Ganser's Work Written With Both Eyes Closed==
	See , where the reviewer easily discredits the so-called scholarly nature of propagandist Daniele Ganser's work.
	:It isn't "so-called" scholarly just because you don't like it, and just because you like the reviewer's opinion more doesn't mean he "easily discredits" anything. Frankly, you don't have the slightest idea what constitutes scholarly nature. Hint: It's not telling you what you want to hear. The fact that you continue to suggest yourself to possess greater expertise than entire university departments is what easily discredits you. Grabbing random pages off the web has nothing to do with "discrediting scholarly nature". Maybe before rambling about "so-called scholarly nature", you familiarize yourself with the concept of peer review. --] 17:22, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
	::OliverH, theres no point getting cross with Morton. His aims here are so hypocritical as to be laughable. He is a caricature wont unto flesh. His world view is so narrow that a cigarette paper of enlightenment could not be slipped between his prejudice and his bigotry, etc.
	::The funniest thing is that he hadn't even read Ganser's book, and sees no reason to, before dismissing it. ... al ] bin ] ''<small>(])</small>'' 17:34, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
	:::I have been published in an academic journal, and was an associate editor for an entire year. I've spaded (i.e. citation and fact-checked) dozens of articles at the doctoral level. Yes, I'm quite familiar with peer-reviewed work, and I'm telling you that Ganser's work would not have passed review where I edited, because a review of his primary sources would have revealed their tabloid nature and outright fabrication. So much for academic rigor. ]<font size=2><font color="Blue">]</font></font>] 18:59, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
	::::Have you read it? ] 18:58, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
	:::::Just been looking through the 960 references in Ganser's book. Can't see any `tabloids'. Which ones are your referring to specifically? ... al ] bin ] ''<small>(])</small>'' 21:16, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
	::::That Ganser's work would not have passed peer review where you edited may well be. The question is whether there would have been academic reasons for it or if it would just have been your lack of scholarly integrity. "Academic rigor" is what your conduct is completely, and utterly, devoid of, because no one considering himself seriously a scholar would "criticise" an academic publication in the defamatory and unscholarly way you are doing it. Most of all, no one would dare raise accusations of fabrication without bringing more than arrogant, jingoistic "everyone who disagrees with me is an idiot" language. No one seriously considering himself a scholar would grab random articles off the web claiming they prove anything, much less that a few lines of unreferences text would debunk an academic publication. Raising allegations of fabrication without any evidence clearly demonstrates the complete and utter lack of scholarly integrity on your part. Your "editing" would fit neatly into a chinese government publication. --] 23:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
	:::::The ''Journal of Intelligence History'' is very scholarly and reputable and they say "Ganser fails to present proof of and an in-depth explanation of the claimed conspiracy...." That's pretty lacking in a book that claims a conspiracy. --] 03:30, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
	::::::Even a cursory examination of the literature would reveal that FM 31-30B is a fake, a document which Ganser accepts without critical examination, and relies upon heavily in forming his conclusions. ]<font size=2><font color="Blue">]</font></font>] 08:57, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
	:::::::Ganser does not accept the FM without criticism and certainly does not 'rely heavily' on it for his conclusions. He mentions it on 3 pages in the book of 300 pages and it is 1 of 960 sources.
	:::::::It is quite clear that you have not read the book.... al ] bin ] ''<small>(])</small>'' 10:08, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
	::::::::Citation to the fabricated Field Manual is enough to call the whole work into question, but that's just the low-hanging fruit. I've read the relevant discussion about the FM, and he's hardly skeptical of its sourcing. ]<font size=2><font color="Blue">]</font></font>] 17:20, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
	:::::::::So you admit you haven't read the book? Don't you think its dishonest to dismiss a book you haven;t read and make comments on that books' `tabloid' sources, when you have no idea what you are talking about? ... al ] bin ] ''<small>(])</small>'' 17:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
	:::::::::Its not a provocation, its a very serious question. Its important for every editor you work with to understand what you think is acceptable behaviour. ... al ] bin ] ''<small>(])</small>'' 17:31, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
	::I personally don't have time to read all the crackpot books. There are enough legitimate historical references to read. But in the context of Misplaced Pages, your reading and interpretation of Ganser is Original Research and reading it is not required to find critical references to it. Other people have found his use of the FM to question all of his conclusions and, indeed, his methods. The only thing I have seen that you have provided to support him is a vague affiliation with a University. Nothing at all though that rises to a peer reviewed substantial historical journal. There are two facts worth noting 1) Ganser wrote it and 2) it is a bunch of baloney. --] 00:35, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

			== The mice have grown bold. ==
	:::This is the best one yet! `Its a conspiracy theory because I haven't read it, and I haven't read it because its a conspiracy'. Further your suggesting that if I read it and you don't, thats Original Research. Ha ha. <strike>Thats the stupidest thing I've ever heard.</strike>
	:::I know you know this, but I'll repeat it again - The book itself has been reviewed and accepted by one of the world's best universities - and here's a list of Ganser's other peer reviewed journal publications .
	:::You attempt to use misquoted wikipedia policy as a mental shield against reality. It doesn't work and just make you look silly. ... al ] bin ] ''<small>(])</small>'' 00:48, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
	::::I take that back. Sorry Tbeatty. The stupidest thing I ever heard was actually Mongo this morning claiming that Occam's Razer was a danger and threat to 'bodily harm'. Its hard to beat that!... al ] bin ] ''<small>(])</small>'' 00:59, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
	:::::You know, I saw the conversation over at ANI earlier today. Seabhcan, why do you want to bring that subject here? ] <small>]/]</small> 01:23, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
	::::::Mainly because its just so delightfully funny! ... al ] bin ] ''<small>(])</small>'' 01:33, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
	:::::::I do not see this as a joking matter. Seabhcan, I am asking you this out of personal request, please stop. Have you not considered what has been discussed at your RfC? ] <small>]/]</small> 01:37, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

			Yes, it's happening again. Eternal vigilance is needed!
	:::::Has no-one a sense of humour around here anymore? ... al ] bin ] ''<small>(])</small>'' 01:53, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
			*]
			*]
			It's dire, Morton. Most dire.--]] 20:46, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

			== Take Two: Request for change in consensus ==
	:::: I presume the logical intuition that has led you to trust Ganser has also lead you to the fallacy that you stated above. I am glad you read Ganser. It means nothing however. I make no claims about whether someone has read Ganser or not read Ganser makes it a conspiracy theory. However, the criticism from third party sources is what is relevant to Misplaced Pages, not your own interpretation. Nor does someone's lack of familiarity with that work make their criticism using third party source less valid than your own. Further, you seem unfamiliar with Ph.D. dissertations. They are reviewed based on the individuals ability to do research and also on it's novelty. Those are the two major requirements. Ganser has done plenty of research and his conclusions and analysis are novel. Whence the Ph.D.

			Take Two: Request for change in consensus. Change title to "Franklin Child Abuse Allegations"
	:::: So here's the deal: If Morton says that the Editors at Historical Review say Ganser is a loon, and you retort with "No, I read it and he is right." Guess who gets to put his stuff in Misplaced Pages? If your retort to Morton's sourced criticism is your own personal interpretation of what you read, well, that and a quarter will get you a phone call in the U.S. (that's probably a Euro where you live). --] 03:39, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

			"A small group of editors can reach a consensual decision, but when the article gains wider attention, others may then disagree. The original group should not block further change on grounds that they already have made a decision. No one person, and no (limited) group of people, can unilaterally declare that community consensus has changed, or that it is fixed and determined."
	:::::Do the editors at historical review say 'he's a loon'? Is that opinion in print and is it peer reviewed? Or is it just some crap you pulled of a blog somewhere? ... al ] bin ] ''<small>(])</small>'' 03:42, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
	::::::I just made it up. Is English your first language? I also made up Historical Review. The policy is that third party verfifiable sources are preferred over your opinion. You can memorize Ganser word-for-word and I won't care what you have to say about it. Only that you can source it. The same is for Morton. If Morton sources "Ganser is a loon." that trumps your "Ganser is right and I meomorized his work in anticipation of making him God-King.". --] 03:49, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

			The existing title "Franklin Coverup Hoax" is, in the opinion of many who have commented (Gyrofrog, Awfultin, Wayne, Tom1976, Conexion, Apostle 12), fatally biased. To start out saying that the subject material is a "hoax" is indefensible, especially when that point of view is hardly universal. A specially called county grand jury used the word "hoax;" that is all. And there is ample reason to believe that those who comprised the jury had a vested interest in protecting local people.
	==Take a look at ]==
	I tagged ] with a db-bio, but someone removed it. I am considering an AfD. The subject just does not seem notable. He chaired a meeting that looks like it was attended by a couple dozen souls at best, another source doesn't seem to exist anymore, and one source is an online petition. He has had a collection of his pamphlets published. I don't think this qualifies for the CT board, or I would have posted on the talk page there. What do you think? If he is truly notable, it isn't established in the article. ] 21:38, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
	:It doesn't seem to have any reliable sources, just citations to blogs. Place a tag on it requesting citations, like <nowiki>{{primary sources}}</nowiki>. If it doesn't get fixed in two weeks, then nom it. ]<font size=2><font color="Blue">]</font></font>] 02:17, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

			In the previous section, various editors commented on their support for, or opposition to, a name change to "Franklin Coverup Incident." Those who commented over the space of several days included Sherurcij, PopeFauveXXIII, Wayne, Orange Mike, Apostle12, and Rosicrucian.
	==Another list of pages==
	*]
	] <sup>]</sup> 14:31, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

			Orange Mike came up with a suggestion: How about "Franklin Child Abuse Allegations"? Neutral, takes no position regarding "hoax" or "coverup" claims.
	==Daniel Pearl==
	Whats up Monty? The President of a country where a thing happens says something interesting on that topic and you call that "undue weight". Its one sentence. Do you think that the President of Pakistan is a 'conspiracy theorist'? ] 20:19, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
	:First, that sort of thing may belong in the Musharraf article, but here (in Daniel Pearl) by itself without examination it is undue weight. Second, my name is not 'Monty' -- if you wish to shorten it, call me Mort, Morty, Matt or MD. Lastly, please refrain from personal characterizations such as "obsession" -- it's not appropriate on Misplaced Pages to make ad hominem attacks. I know you have been warned about this before -- I do not wish to bring an Rfc or Arbcom case against you -- I think they are mostly ineffective. Instead, I will just ask you politely here to stop making insulting comments towards me. Thank you. ]<font size=2><font color="Blue">]</font></font>] 20:39, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

			I '''support''' this newly proposed title change and am asking for additional comments at this time from concerned editors. ] (]) 20:20, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
	::You are very sensitive to criticism, Mo-ty, but I don't 'attack' you. I am sensitive to your attacks on wikipedia content. If you believe the comment by the president of Pakistan on the case is 'undue weight' why do you leave the next comment which states, "The U.S. Government believes that Khalid Shaikh Mohammed conspired in the kidnapping." Is this not equally unweighted? Or do you think everything your government says is gospel? I will remove this statement also for the time being. ] 20:51, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
	:::Say it with me: "Morty". I know you can do it. ]<font size=2><font color="Blue">]</font></font>] 21:10, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
	::::How about Devon Mortonshire? Feel like answering the question yet? ] 21:12, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
	:::::Baloney, this looks like borderline trolling. Just thought you ought to know. ] <small>]/]</small> 21:36, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
	::::::I agree. Thanks for your support. Mo-ty needs to learn to put his fanatical nationalism to one side when he edits. ] 21:45, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
	:::::::Here, I am not "supporting" you - especially since you cannot have a discussion without attempting to push someone’s buttons. ] <small>]/]</small> 21:53, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

			== Image:TinFoilHat_Superfriends.jpg listed for deletion ==
	::::::::Oh, but pushing Mo-ty's buttons is so easy and fun. You should try. Its addictive. ] 21:57, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
			An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. {{#if:\|{{{2}}}\|Thank you.}} ] <sup>]</sup> 15:33, 26 May 2008 (UTC) <!-- Template:Idw -->
	:::::::::So this means you admit that you are trolling? ] <small>]/]</small> 22:22, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

			== Image:Kat_man_doo.png listed for deletion ==
	::::::::No. I'm calling Mo-ty on his biased edits. When I do that he ignores my point and choses to be distracted by my misspelling his name (which is childish - few people ever spell my name correctly yet I take the time to answer their questions anyway) So, Morty, any hope of you explaining why a comment by the US government on an event in Pakistan is acceptable while a comment by the Pakistani government is 'undue weight'? ] 22:31, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
			An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. {{#if:\|{{{2}}}\|Thank you.}} ] ] 23:12, 6 July 2008 (UTC) <!-- Template:Idw -->
	:::::::::First, knock off the insults. You are not accomplishing anything. Second, with your confrontational attitude, I wouldn’t deal with you at all. You got off to a bad start on this one. I wouldn’t keep this harassment up if I were you. Cheers. ] <small>]/]</small> 22:55, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

			== Image:Morton_hoodie.png listed for deletion ==
	:::::::::To be honest, I don't think it would make any difference. After months and years of dealing with people like morty, TDS, Mongo, and the rest, it is clear that they have no interest in wikipedia. They are here to push their personal nationalistic bias. History, citation, reality, take a back seat to promotion of their personal myths. ] 23:09, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
			An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. {{#if:\|{{{2}}}\|Thank you.}} <!-- Template:Idw --> ] ] 01:35, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
	::::::::::Well, okay, if you feel that way, I'll let you have a chance to prove it.--] 07:39, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

			==Fair use rationale for File:Purple punch.jpg==
	==RfC==
			Thanks for uploading or contributing to ''']'''. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under ] but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Misplaced Pages constitutes fair use. Please go to ] and edit it to include a ].
	I have opened a request for comment at ]. ] <sup>]</sup> 20:07, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

			If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on ]. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no fair use rationale-notice --> ] (]) 17:38, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
	==OMG==
	How did you do that thing with the title of your talk page, I must learn. ] 22:16, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
	:All of the formatting is borrowed from ]. One trick learned from him is that he also uses a header which is a separate page that he has built, and then inserts using the page name inside little two sets of opening and closing paranthesis. See his page and the one marked Head to see what I mean. ]<font size=2><font color="Blue">]</font></font>] 02:42, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

			==AfD==
	==Olbermann/Rumsfeld edit war==
			Please see: ].] (]) 17:04, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
	Hi, I started a topic in the Keith Olbermann discussion about the recent edit war. I invite you to contribute. Thanks, ] 09:05, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

			== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
	=='Nother conspiracy==
	What needs deleting. See here. This one may take some off-wiki work, but I'm sure you'll manage to get her scrubbed anyway. Cheers. 23:13, 20 November 2006 (UTC){{unsigned\|150.203.2.85}}
	:Now, now. Must play nice here. ]<font size=2><font color="Blue">]</font></font>] 23:32, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
	:: Don't trouble yourself Mort. I've already faxed Rove, and the helicopters are spinning up as I post this. - ] 00:24, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
	::: ]??? ] <small>]/]</small> 19:18, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
	:::: Not just any black helicopters. We have our own ! - ] 19:52, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
	:::::Awesome pic. Blackhawks? ]<font size=2><font color="Blue">]</font></font>] 21:01, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
	::::Here's another two cruft articles: ] and ]. There are editors suggesting it was some kind of conspiracy! Silly people - we all know conspiracies never happen. These were clearly cases of suicide and/or lone gunmen. Get de-crufting! ... al ] bin ] ''<small>(])</small>'' 21:35, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
	:::You are more than welcome to start your own conspiracy notice board. I would keep it in your own space though. ] <small>]/]</small> 21:49, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
	::::Na, I trust Morty to route out all this conspiracy stuff. I know he doesn't just do it for America-related conspiracy theories. That would be biased. ... al ] bin ] ''<small>(])</small>'' 21:55, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
	:::::I know we all joke about conspiracy theories, and most of them are of little consequence because they are so outlandish. Those are the ones I'm most interested in eliminating here because they are not described widely by reputable sources. With respect to the two honorable gentlemen, Prime Minister Hariri and Mr. Gemayel, I will ask kindly that you not joke about their deaths. My friends in Beirut are heartbroken, and tell me that there are at least a dozen more assasinations carried out by Syrian agents that we haven't yet heard about in the Western press. No, not a laughing matter at all. ]<font size=2><font color="Blue">]</font></font>] 00:22, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
	::::::I can assure you that Hariri and Gemayel are not the butt of my joke. But I note with interest that you seem to believe the conspiracy theories regarding Syria's involvement. Have you seen any evidence of it? ... al ] bin ] ''<small>(])</small>'' 00:37, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
	:::::::: I'd say Syria at the behest of their masters, Iran. There are conspiracies in the world, they just don't involve teh hand of Rove crumpling the WTC. - ] 00:56, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
	:::::::::True or not, there is no evidence of that theory publicly available. I'm interested why you choose to believe it? ... al ] bin ] ''<small>(])</small>'' 01:17, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
	:::::::::: ] told me it was true. :O - ] 01:30, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
	:::::::::::I see. Why think for yourself when you have someone to do it for you, eh? ... al ] bin ] ''<small>(])</small>'' 01:33, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
	::::::::::::You catch on quick! ] 01:36, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
	::::::::::Iran isn't Syria's master as they are not particularly aligned religiously or ideologically. However they both support the terrorist group Hizbollah. They both support terrorism against Israel and they both thwart Democracy in Lebanon by undermining the legitimate government. Neither country wants Lebanon to go the way of Jordan and Egypt - namely peace and prosperity while bordering Israel. --] 01:36, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

			<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].
	:::::::::Peace and prosperous! Egypt and Jordan? Read up on them, they are both brutal dictatorships with massive poverty and unemployment. Egypt recently passed a law making it illegal to accuse a public official of corruption!
	:::::::::Israel isn't exactly interested in a democratic Lebanon either. ... al ] bin ] ''<small>(])</small>'' 01:40, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

			The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
	::::::::::I don't have to read any more about them as I've been to Israel, Egypt, Jordan and Lebanon and have seen it. Israel certainly wants a democratic Lebanon that controls it's borders. It also wants a democratic Palestine that controls it's borders. It's like saying they don't want a democratic Egypt or Jordan. Certainly they do. --] 01:47, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

			Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ] (]) 21:15, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
	:::::::::If Israel wanted a democratic Palestine independently in control of its own borders why has it built hundreds of settlements throughout the west bank? Do it intend that the settlers will become Palestinian citizens when the new state is formed? ... al ] bin ] ''<small>(])</small>'' 01:53, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

			== Notification of automated file description generation ==
	::::::::::What do the West Bank settlements have to do with Palestine democracy? The west bank is what it is. There are few if any Palestinians in the settlements. Talking about west bank settlements is about as pointless as talking about right of return. But to help you out, Israel is building a fence to define the border so that settlements cease to be an issue. One side of the fence is Israel, the other side can be a democratic palestine. --] 03:25, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
			Your upload of ] or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

			This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions ]. Thanks!<!--Template:Un-botfill--> ''Message delivered by ] (])'' 14:53, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
	:::::::::This is a common misconception. The settlements are distributed right across the west bank and are connected with each other by a vast network of highways which the Palestinians need permits to cross. The West Bank is no longer a single continuous territory but an archipelago of Palestinian land, literally walled in by a sea of Israeli controlled land and roads. You can't make a country out of that. Its a prison. ... al ] bin ] ''<small>(])</small>'' 11:33, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

			== ] ==
	==One user's view==
	Hey guy. I saw where "stone" censored your questioning his . I was thinking of confronting him about it myself, but he doesn’t look to friendly. I’ll just let his comments at the RfC suffice to let everyone see his "good faith". I didn’t know I was part of a cabal. I didn’t know someone could make accusations like that and get away with it. ] <small>]/]</small> 20:04, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
	:Here is where I am “honored” as part of the . In his own words: ''I have been frequenting one of the boards on which this cabal of page vandals -- devonshire, junglecat, tdc, nuclearzero and their sockpuppets…'' Pretty strong statement. I am surprised no one has called him on it. ] <small>]/]</small> 20:57, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
	::I placed a warning on ] -- depending upon his response you may want to chime in as well. ]<font size=2><font color="Blue">]</font></font>] 01:45, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
	:::You know what is ironic about it? Look who he lists as a "page vandal" - someone he endorsed in the RfC! ] <small>]/]</small> 01:50, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
	::::Years ago I attended a campaign workshop put on by the ] (heh, it was free and I was a broke campaign staffer who wanted to meet chicks). They said: “There are no permanent friends, only permanent interests.” I guess they (the Liberals) really mean it. ]<font size=2><font color="Blue">]</font></font>] 01:55, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
	:::::HeHe, well I wouldn’t go that far. I left a message as well on his talk page. I hope he will consider his statement and help us to come to a peaceful solution. I don’t think those kind of remarks are helping tensions. I have a feeling this whole situation could get bad. I hope not. ] <small>]/]</small> 02:20, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

			{{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 13:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
	==History of Soviet espionage in the United States==
			<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692007949 -->
			==File source problem with File:Blood hound missile.jpg==
			]
			Thank you for uploading ''']'''. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the ] status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the ].

			If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a ] and ask for a chance to fix the problem.<!-- Template:You can request undeletion -->
	I do not believe your recent edit of ] was proper given the unresolved conflict in the Discussion page. The fact that you have edited that talk page indicates you are aware the dispute was unresolved. Please revert your edit until the unresolved citation dispute is resolved via mediation or by the addition of requested citations. ] 19:30, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

			Please refer to the ''']''' to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Misplaced Pages. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a . If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no source-notice --> ] <sup>]</sup> 09:55, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
	: I did it myself. If you happen to know the citations and page numbers for the unsourced fact tagged passages, please post them. ] 19:53, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
			== File:Can you hear me now.png listed for discussion ==
			] A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw --> ] ] ] 00:46, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

			== Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago ==
	==Striver's Request==
	Hi Morton. I know this is kind of off-topic and not directly involved to Misplaced Pages, but considering our many contributions to the encyclopedia, I'm sure they can expend us a few bits of data.

			{{User QAIbox
	I wonder if you are willing to take a pledge?
			\| title = Awesome
			\| image = Cscr-featured.svg
			\| image_upright = 0.35
			\| bold = ]
			}}
			--] (]) 06:23, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
			== ] of ] ==
			]

			The file ] has been ] because of the following concern:
	If you ever find yourself in the situation were you find yourself believing that the USA government actually did or allowed 911 to happen, then you will inform openly to everyone you know about your strong efforts to destroy as many articles as possible that represented that point of view on Misplaced Pages, in contrast to hiding your current and previous actions. Deal?
			<blockquote>Personal file, no foreseeable encyclopedic use</blockquote>

			While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
	It should not be any problem for you to make such a pledge, since you believe that you will never find yourself in such situation, right? In fact, don't even answer me, just make up your mind about the pledge, and make it a firm pledge, if you choose to do so.

			You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
	Peace. --] 01:29, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
	:Striver, you are an earnest guy who seems genuinely concerned about these issues, and I respect that. Let me say with all seriousness that if the leadership of my country were implicated in the 9/11 attacks, that I would not waste my time writing about it on Misplaced Pages. I would go to the streets, and take direct action to overthrow my government. And I don't mean 'direct action' in the way the Anarchists mean it. I wouldn't be alone. We are a People who threw-off the Tyrant, and push come to shove, would do it again. We have lots of faults, we Americans, but tolerance for getting shoved around by the elites is not one of them. Long live the Republic! And Happy Thanksgiving to you in The Netherlands(?). Peace to you, my Brother. ]<font size=2><font color="Blue">]</font></font>] 02:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
	::This is almost the exact same thing I have mentioned to Striver as well...and I repeat it...had the U.S. Government been responsible for 9/11, we would be in the midsts of a revolution.--] 17:31, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

			Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 21:33, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
	== Arbitration ==
			== ] of ] ==
			]

			The file ] has been ] because of the following concern:
	I have opened a case of arbitration at --] 07:59, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
			<blockquote>Personal file, no foreseeable encyclopedic use</blockquote>

			While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].

			You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].

			Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 21:36, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
			== ] of ] ==
			]

			The file ] has been ] because of the following concern:
			<blockquote>Personal file, no foreseeable encyclopedic use</blockquote>

			While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].

			You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].

			Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 21:45, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
			== ] of ] ==
			]

			The file ] has been ] because of the following concern:
			<blockquote>Misuse of wikipedia as a webhost, no foreseeable encyclopedic use</blockquote>

			While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].

			You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].

			Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 21:46, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
			== ] of ] ==
			]

			The file ] has been ] because of the following concern:
			<blockquote>Misuse of wikipedia as a webhost, no foreseeable encyclopedic use</blockquote>

			While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].

			You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].

			Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 21:46, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
			== ] of ] ==
			]

			The file ] has been ] because of the following concern:
			<blockquote>Misuse of wikipedia as a webhost, no foreseeable encyclopedic use</blockquote>

			While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].

			You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].

			Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 22:44, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
			== ] of ] ==
			]

			The file ] has been ] because of the following concern:
			<blockquote>unused, low-res, no obvious use</blockquote>

			While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].

			You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].

			Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify -->

			<span style="color:red;font-weight:bold;">This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the ] of each individual file for details.</span> Thanks, ] (]) 01:01, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
			== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
			<div class="afd-notice">
			<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0;">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].

			The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

			Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> <b>] ]</b> 17:10, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 17:10, 28 August 2024

This user may have left Misplaced Pages. Morton devonshire has not edited Misplaced Pages since November 2007. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

My work here is done

Aye, I've been dodging the conclusion for months. Tweaking the PrisonPlanet.com people kept me in the game, but I can't avoid it anymore: There's just not much Wiki-violatin' vanity-conspiracy-spamology left to delete! I leave it to you all to monitor for the time being -- I'm going on an indefinite Wikibreak, and moving on to more productive enterprises. See you all at the Grove! Cheers to all of you, on both sides of the rabbit hole -- it's been a real pleasure. Call me on the Bat Phone if anything comes up. MortonDevonshire Yo · 19:11, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Sad to see you go. You take care man! It has been an interesting venture with you here. Peace to you good friend. JungleCat Shiny!/Oohhh! 19:17, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

You've done work to be proud of. Take care, Tom Harrison 01:28, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

I hope you can be productive. Mujinga (talk) 00:32, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Hey Morton, just thought you might like to see this piece on you taken from prisonplanet.com;

You're famous dude!--Cantsi Wontsi (talk) 01:51, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Hey Morton! What have you been up to? Been keeping up with the Joneses? SkeenaR (talk) 02:38, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

You go, I'm back. Have fun in the Grove. Say hi to Hilary for me. ;)

But seriously, I wonder what really keeps you ticking. Do you really believe you did the right thing?  Xiutwel ♫☺♥♪ (talk) 19:18, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

In case you ever eventually read this: I didn't know you at the time but you seem to have been doing awesome work. I also borrowed and adapted (and adopted) one of your user boxes, then created another one inspired from material on one of your pages. Who knows, maybe other people will also use them in your memory. I hope you're doing well, —Paleo Neonate – 11:22, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

The mice have grown bold.

Yes, it's happening again. Eternal vigilance is needed!

It's dire, Morton. Most dire.--Rosicrucian 20:46, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Take Two: Request for change in consensus

Take Two: Request for change in consensus. Change title to "Franklin Child Abuse Allegations"

"A small group of editors can reach a consensual decision, but when the article gains wider attention, others may then disagree. The original group should not block further change on grounds that they already have made a decision. No one person, and no (limited) group of people, can unilaterally declare that community consensus has changed, or that it is fixed and determined."

The existing title "Franklin Coverup Hoax" is, in the opinion of many who have commented (Gyrofrog, Awfultin, Wayne, Tom1976, Conexion, Apostle 12), fatally biased. To start out saying that the subject material is a "hoax" is indefensible, especially when that point of view is hardly universal. A specially called county grand jury used the word "hoax;" that is all. And there is ample reason to believe that those who comprised the jury had a vested interest in protecting local people.

In the previous section, various editors commented on their support for, or opposition to, a name change to "Franklin Coverup Incident." Those who commented over the space of several days included Sherurcij, PopeFauveXXIII, Wayne, Orange Mike, Apostle12, and Rosicrucian.

Orange Mike came up with a suggestion: How about "Franklin Child Abuse Allegations"? Neutral, takes no position regarding "hoax" or "coverup" claims.

I support this newly proposed title change and am asking for additional comments at this time from concerned editors. Apostle12 (talk) 20:20, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:TinFoilHat_Superfriends.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:TinFoilHat_Superfriends.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly 15:33, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Image:Kat_man_doo.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Kat_man_doo.png, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 23:12, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:Morton_hoodie.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Morton_hoodie.png, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 01:35, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Purple punch.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Purple punch.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Misplaced Pages constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 17:38, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

AfD

Please see: Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/The terrorists have won (2nd nomination).Kitfoxxe (talk) 17:04, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Karen Russell for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Karen Russell is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Karen Russell until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dennis Bratland (talk) 21:15, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Can you hear me now.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:53, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Blood hound missile.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Blood hound missile.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Misplaced Pages. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly 09:55, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Can you hear me now.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Can you hear me now.png, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 00:46, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago

Awesome
Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:23, 1 August 2017 (UTC)