| Revision as of 08:45, 27 November 2006 editTrialsanderrors (talk | contribs)Administrators17,564 edits Misplaced Pages:Long term abuse/HeadleyDown - Restored, nomination at MfD optional.← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 17:59, 5 September 2022 edit undoHouseBlaster (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators58,044 editsm Fix linter errors (via WP:JWB) |
| (6 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) |
| Line 2: |
Line 2: |
|
{| width = "100%" |
|
{| width = "100%" |
|
|- |
|
|- |
|
! width="50%" align="left" | <font color="gray"><</font> ] |
|
! width="50%" align="left" | <span style="color:gray;"><</span> ] |
|
! width="50%" align="right" | ] <font color="gray">></font> |
|
! width="50%" align="right" | ] <span style="color:gray;">></span> |
|
|} |
|
|} |
|
</div> |
|
</div> |
| Line 9: |
Line 9: |
|
</noinclude> |
|
</noinclude> |
|
|
|
|
|
===21st November 2006=== |
|
===]=== |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
====]==== |
|
|
:{{la|PircBot}} — (]) |
|
|
Deleted for being 'none notable software', but it has 100k+ Google hits and it's a commonly deployed IRC bot framework ] 02:53, 21 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:I'd also like to add that PircBot is heavily referenced in the book 'IRC Hacks' by Paul Mutton, published by O'Reilly . --] 02:59, 21 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
* '''Endorse deletion''' of stub which made no claim to notability. No prejudice against a proper article citing reliable secondary sources. I will userfy the stub is that will help. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 09:40, 21 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
* '''Endorse deletion, userfy''' and recreate if and when it's reliably sourced. ] 18:44, 21 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
====]==== |
|
|
:{{la|WiktionaryZ}} — (]) |
|
|
The article deals with a preparatory project for the Ultimate Wiktionary as part of the Wikimedia Project. ] 01:43, 21 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*'''Endorse deletion''' if the above is the argument for inclusion. See ]. --] 01:57, 21 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
**I think the information is important for the Wikimedia contributors. The article should at least be placed in the Misplaced Pages namespace with a redirect from ]. There is an article on the site on several wikipedias, including ]. This German article better explains the importance of the site and it is in the Misplaced Pages namespace. ] 02:15, 21 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
**See also the coverage on ]. |
|
|
] 02:19, 21 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*'''Endorse own deletion'''. In the article namespace, this fails ] (no media mentions, etc). I would support a move to the project namespace if someone could show how this is relevant to ''Misplaced Pages'', but it doesn't look directly relevant to us, only relevant to Wiktionary, IMO. <tt>].]</tt> 03:04, 21 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*'''Endorse''', given this already exists where it should be, in meta. Maybe put something in Misplaced Pages: namespace if it's relevant to us. ] <small></small> 07:51, 21 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*'''Endorse''', yes, probably belongs in Meta. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 09:41, 21 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*'''Endorse''', at present doesn't belong in main space. We'd probably as standard respond to a statement such as the above with ] a crystal ball, or that if it's simply publicity that ] a vehicle for advertising, I can't see we can hold a wikimedia sponsered project to a lesser standard. --] 15:12, 21 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*'''endorse''' per above. --] 19:00, 21 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*'''Endorse''', it's just not notable right now. Maybe if it ever is finished and does become a huge hit, then it can get its own article. --] 22:07, 21 November 2006 (UTC) |
|