Misplaced Pages

:Suspected sock puppets/Midsyndicate: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Suspected sock puppets Browse history interactivelyContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:16, 28 November 2006 editPeacekpr (talk | contribs)78 edits SSP evidence  Latest revision as of 14:14, 28 November 2006 edit undoSkinny McGee (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,608 edits doesn't make sense 
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
===]===

*] and ] are the same. User also appears to have created sleeper socks ] and ]. All of the rest are inconclusive. Report: ] *] and ] are the same. User also appears to have created sleeper socks ] and ]. All of the rest are inconclusive. Report: ]


Line 21: Line 23:
'''Comments''' '''Comments'''
* The case ] seems to have begun much earlier than I realized and I may have improperly listed a puppet as the master. ] 03:16, 28 November 2006 (UTC) * The case ] seems to have begun much earlier than I realized and I may have improperly listed a puppet as the master. ] 03:16, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

*This is getting ridiculous. I'm beginning to feel like I'm being stalked. Your only Misplaced Pages edits are aimed at discrediting me and it's really getting crazy. Anyway, I was reviewing ] and it clearly states that "cases of sockpuppetry older than one week are useless." Midsyndicate has not had any activity on Misplaced Pages since February 2006. Indeed, almost every one of the names you list as my suspected sock puppets falls well outside this standard. I've looked up the most recent edits of each -
:*] - February 19, 2006
:*] - February 20, 2006
:*] - October 22, 2006
:*] - October 22, 2006
:*] - October 20, 2006
:*] - November 17, 2006
:*] - November 1, 2006
I'm not anybody's sockpuppet and I don't believe this even qualifies for investigation. - ] 03:51, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

* Um, well, that statement right there above, which was posted as I tried to follow through posting the evidence page, while on this very report proves SkinnyMcGee is a sock of Midsyndciate, does it not? Please note again ] that Skinny McGee is a sock and has 2 more sleepers in reserve. Why not 8 or 10? ] 04:46, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

::That doesn't even make any sense. - ] 14:14, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

I might note that Skinny McGee removed the template from the Midsyndicate user page before adding his remark here. ] 04:50, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
:Yet another false claim. It was me who removed the template from ] userpage, and I removed it because the previous checkuser report ] filed determined that ] is not ]. . ] 04:58, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

The first SSP investigation request did not specify the MASTER puppet being Midsyndicate. I did not properly make the request. That is why I am doing it again in the right order, hopefully. ] 11:13, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 14:14, 28 November 2006

User:Midsyndicate

  • To gather more info on inconclusive results above, I am requesting another check to include older users.

List of suspects in order of appearance

diffs (for more recent diffs, please see the case noted above).

  • 67.140.86.158 made edit that is same promotional material as posted by Lizstjames.
  • After promotional material was rv, 67.140.86.158 posted same again
  • Same material again rv by Midsyndicate who claims to be Edward Douglas (band founder) which shows that he is editing his own bio and also indicates his disfavor of former partner.
  • 162.40.19.208 refers to "disgruntled former business partner" in summary. ...
  • Skinny_McGee's numerous reversions and removal of verifiable sources also are summarized with "disgruntled business partner" which indicate that Skinny McGee and 162.40.19.208 and Midsyndicate, if not same, are all working under same agenda.

Comments

  • This is getting ridiculous. I'm beginning to feel like I'm being stalked. Your only Misplaced Pages edits are aimed at discrediting me and it's really getting crazy. Anyway, I was reviewing Misplaced Pages:Suspected_sock_puppets and it clearly states that "cases of sockpuppetry older than one week are useless." Midsyndicate has not had any activity on Misplaced Pages since February 2006. Indeed, almost every one of the names you list as my suspected sock puppets falls well outside this standard. I've looked up the most recent edits of each -

I'm not anybody's sockpuppet and I don't believe this even qualifies for investigation. - Skinny McGee 03:51, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

That doesn't even make any sense. - Skinny McGee 14:14, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

I might note that Skinny McGee removed the template from the Midsyndicate user page before adding his remark here. Peacekpr 04:50, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Yet another false claim. It was me who removed the template from User:Midsyndicate userpage, and I removed it because the previous checkuser report User:Peacekpr filed determined that User:Midsyndicate is not User:Skinny McGee. . Dionyseus 04:58, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

The first SSP investigation request did not specify the MASTER puppet being Midsyndicate. I did not properly make the request. That is why I am doing it again in the right order, hopefully. Peacekpr 11:13, 28 November 2006 (UTC)