| Revision as of 00:50, 29 November 2006 edit131.94.167.215 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 00:25, 2 February 2007 edit undoTheronJ (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,139 edits Removed page from Cat:Temp to preserve it, and left explanatory note in comments |
| (11 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{| class="messagebox standard-talk plainlinks" style="padding:5px; width:auto;" |
|
{{indefblocked}} |
|
|
|
| ] |
|
|
|
|
|
| '''This user has been ] from editing Misplaced Pages.'''<br /><small>(see: • ] • • )</small> |
|
{{unblock|There is no reason for this. What threat is there? It sounds "close" to a threat? I did not threaten and this was in very, very bad faith. I should be unblocked immediatly. I have done nothing wrong. Anyone that reviews what has been going on will understand this. I asked for my account to be deleted and there was a legitamate discussion going on. I was receiving ADVICE. This is another example of an admin over-reacting over advice and HELP seeking. Blocked for seeking help and advice? When others were helping me too? Please unblock me.}} |
|
|
|
|}<!-- Template:Indefblockeduser --> |
|
|
|
|
|
<!--Note: I removed this article from Cat:Temp at Mizha13's suggestion. I request that this page be kept - the user was created primarily to harass me, and I would like to keep the history available in case he pops up again; I may need access to the diffs showing prior warnings or attempts at dispute resolution. See generally Misplaced Pages:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Archive63#Account_Deletion_Request for a discussion where we agreed to blank this page but keep it. Thanks, TheronJ--> |
|
after you asked that it be "deleted". I "deleted" (read: blocked) it. <tt style="color:#161;">RadioKirk<small> (]|]|])</small></tt> 23:45, 28 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
Well I think your corse of actions seem fair...however, the reasons for doing it are wrong. I would have liked for you to talk to me as I had requested. If my suggestion violated a rule...then I did not know. It is just wrong that people act without thinking to open a discussion. Don't you think that is wrong too? |
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you for deleting the talk page. It was too much. I would like to suggest that the talk page be blocked from editing by other users for now. |
|
|
|
|
|
Now...PLEASE DO NOT TAKE NEGATIVE ACTION FOR ASKING...would it be possible to block edits on the user-talk page for now while unblocking the ability to edit? |
|
|
|
|
|
I think the blocking could have been a positive move if it had been done in good faith. I do not think it was but would accept some kind of positive response as an apology. |
|
|
|
|
|
Furthermore, I find the irony that blocking me completly violates Libertarian principles. Please consider. |
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you. ] 23:54, 28 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:The talk page has not been deleted; its history remains. Editing by others cannot be blocked unless in cases of clear vandalism; that has not happened. You asked that the account be "deleted"; that cannot happen unless it is blocked. If you're asking that other users somehow not "bother" you as a result of your edits, the only way that will happen is if you don't edit any more. Taking all these into consideration, I took the course of action I felt was necessary. If you have more of an explanation, please do so. <tt style="color:#161;">RadioKirk<small> (]|]|])</small></tt> 00:04, 29 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you for your response. Now that the account is blocked, will you please delete it? |
|
|
|
|
|
Now, there are CLEAR examples of vandalism on my page...Indeed, I emphasise the fact that aggressive action took place without a clear understanding of the facts. The reason why I asked for my account to be deleted was vandalism by people I have NEVER had any interaction with. I ask that you "take these into consideration." Look at just today's history. It is weird. I havn't edited in a month. |
|
|
|
|
|
Now that you know some more facts...and the account is blocked...please delete my account? Talk page? Ban edits because of clear vandalism? |
|
|
|
|
|
Change must happen with this account in one way or another. |
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you, |
|
|
] 00:17, 29 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:Which are you suggesting, that legitimate warnings from other users are vandalism, or that blanking them yourself is vandalism? <tt style="color:#161;">RadioKirk<small> (]|]|])</small></tt> 00:22, 29 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
I did not blank them. Some weird person did and they may even know me...I don't know. But I know what sock puppets are and I am not one. That reply assumes too much and is unfair...but does not contridict earlier actions. |
|
|
|
|
|
This is why there should be a deletion and/or a block from editing the page. |
|
|
|
|
|
I have provided a fair case for deletion. If you need more of an explination, please request. |
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you, |
|
|
] 00:29, 29 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:The only edits by ] are to the IP's talk page and this talk page, to give a seemingly unprovoked warning to ] and to report that user to ]. You are currently editing from 131.94.167.215, both of which resolve to Florida International University. If you're not a sockpuppet, you're a meatpuppet. Requests denied. You may request further review or, better yet, move on to your next project. <tt style="color:#161;">RadioKirk<small> (]|]|])</small></tt> 00:41, 29 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
You don't understand. Furthermore, you accused me of being a meatpuppet, which is wrong and I believe a serious offense. Once again, another action without knowing all the facts, which is why it is important to end this page. |
|
|
|
|
|
I want to show to you why it is important why ] has vandalized my page...WHICH I DO NOT APPROVE. |
|
|
If I approved of it, I would not be upset by it. I am being fully transparent. |
|
|
|
|
|
Can you not see why this page must be deleted? |
|
|
] 00:50, 29 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
