Misplaced Pages

:Requests for page protection: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:44, 30 November 2006 view sourceSteel (talk | contribs)20,265 edits →{{La|List of Serb war criminals}}: declined← Previous edit Latest revision as of 19:15, 24 December 2024 view source Cyberbot I (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors1,716,376 edits Clerking main page and moving requests to appropriate subpages.Tag: Manual revert 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{noadminbacklog}}<!-- Do not hide or modify this, a bot named "Cyberbot I" will manage it automatically.--><noinclude><!-- Please put protection templates *inside* the noinclude, because this page is transcluded. -->{{Short description|Wikimedia noticeboard for requesting protection of pages}}{{/Header}}{{Floating link|class=sysop-show|Administrator instructions|Administrator instructions}}{{pp-move-indef|small=yes}}{{#ifeq:{{PROTECTIONLEVEL:edit}}|autoconfirmed|{{pp|1=vandalism|action=edit|small=yes|expiry=}}}}<!-- Put interwikis at the Wikidata entry and categories in /Header instead of this page -->
<!--{{Adminbacklog}}-->
__FORCETOC__</noinclude><!-- Do not hide or modify this, a bot named "Cyberbot I" will manage it automatically-->
<!--############################################################
<!-- DO NOT EDIT THIS PAGE. The formatting is enforced by Cyberbot. To make changes, please contact Cyberpower678. -->
DO NOT DELETE/MOVE SECTIONS WITHOUT DISCUSSION FIRST!
VoABot will not archive this page if the format is changed.
############################################################-->
{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/Header}}


<!-- Please copy the following example code to add a new entry at the bottom of the correct subpage:
==Current requests for protection==
=== ] ===
{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/PRheading}}
* {{pagelinks|Example}} ~~~~
<!--##############################################################
-->
PLEASE PLACE NEW REQUESTS AT THE TOP OF THIS SECTION!


== Current ] in protection level ==
Add ===={{La|THE ARTICLE NAME}}====as the request title
{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/Button protect}}{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/Increase}}
<!-- DO NOT PUT NEW REQUESTS HERE. GO TO THE SUBPAGE ABOVE -->


== Current ] in protection level ==
###############Please only edit below this line.###############-->
{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/Button unprotect}}{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/Decrease}}
<!-- DO NOT PUT NEW REQUESTS HERE. GO TO THE SUBPAGE ABOVE -->


== Current ] to a protected page ==
===={{La|List of Serb war criminals}}====
{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/Button edit}}{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/Edit}}
'''Semi-protection'''/Alternatively '''Full-protection'''
<!-- DO NOT PUT NEW REQUESTS HERE. GO TO THE SUBPAGE ABOVE -->
] is putting up the article ] for deletion. I wrote the article and it simply lists notorious people, members of serb army, who commited horrible attrocities during the wars on the Balkans. I feel like that user Duja want's, in some way, to hide these crimes and even perhaps deny them by constantly putting up, a totally fundamental and true article, for deletion. Please intervene with this problem by, for example, unabeling him to edit this specific article. This sort of things make wikipedia a sorrowful place which really hurts to see. Greetings ] 14:26, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
:{{RFPP|d}} -- ] 14:44, 30 November 2006 (UTC)


== Handled requests ==
===={{La|Toyotomi Hideyoshi}}====
''A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at ].''
'''Semi-protection''' Excessive reverts to a NPOV version by anonymous users (most likely one person using several IP addresses) despite discussion in the talk page. --] 11:59, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
:{{RFPP|s}} vandalism ] 13:37, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

===={{La|Harry Whittington}}====
'''Semi-protection''' Excessive NPOV vandalism by anonymous users. --] 10:37, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
*Do you mean POV by any chance? There's nothing wrong with a ]|] 13:27, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

===={{La|Totse}}====
'''Semi-protection''' There is currently a 'feud' going on between the members of Totse and a televangelist, and they have taken to vandalising the Totse article for whatever reason. It should calm down in a few days. ] 08:17, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

===={{La|Crop circle}}====
'''Full protection'''. ] has been flaming on the talk page for this article, with various highly dubious 'evidence' of unspecified anamolies around crop circles. He has recently been adding this material to the article, with no support from other editors (one of his main reasons for including the material was that no editors had objected, or, more likely, had bothered to respond to the flaming). I at one point debunked all of the 'evidence' he offered, over the course of several hours and iterations. I eventually concluded that he would not accept any of mine, or other editors', reasoning, and ceased to reply in hopes of the flaming eventually dying out. I am loath to request a block on Tommysun, because he has not blatantly vandalized, but I request protection of the article until there is an obvious consensus, either for his additions or against them. I personally am against them, but if there were consesus for addition, I would not object. Based on his pattern of taking absence of disapproval as approval, I suspect that he will keep adding the contested material in the absence of protection. ] 08:12, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

===={{La|Demographics of Taiwan}}====
'''Semi-protection''', this is the other page that needs semi-protection. 71.106.x.x refuses to join the ] co-ordination and claims to be a "Watchdog" with others monitoring Taiwan-related pages. This is not constructive to work outside a team especially when he joins in at the last hour of the edits to insert politically motivated wordings. Semi-protection is needed to prevent anonymous users making political statements. They can't be bothered to register on Misplaced Pages, can't be bothered to join the project group, it just shows there is no commitment to work constructively and that their purpose is one of politics only. Please semi-protect the pages. — ] 07:41, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

===={{La|Taiwanese people}}====
'''Semi-protection''', 71.106.x.x, who had been blocked once before, is continuing to make political edits. I had requested semi-protection three times but admins declined citing "not enough activity", why should we engage in an edit war just to protect sensitive pages from anonymous edits? — ] 07:41, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

===={{La|Lamb of God (band)}}====
'''Semi protection''' Article has been under constant fire by anon vandals recently, and at the request of ], we'd like to get this one semi-protected, at least untill the vandalism slows down. Thanks! ] 07:03, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
:{{RFPP|p}} multiple IP vandalism ] 14:30, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

===={{la|Plate tectonics}}====
It's nearing the end of a school term, and this article is getting a lot of extremely bitter visitors. There's been enough disruption that it could stand to be semi-protected until people get over it. --] 05:21, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

===={{La|Steroids}}====
It seems that this page has been vandalized more frequently than other chemicals because it is a class of chemicals associated with sex and ]. --] 04:55, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
:{{RFPP|nea}} - presumed you meant ] article not the redirect page ] ] 14:17, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

===={{La|Subway (restaurant)}}====
'''Semi protection''' Some major major vandalism has hit this page over the last few days, maybe a week, including the line ''IF YOU'RE DOING A REPORT ON SUBWAY YOU SHOULD PROBABLY STOP READING THIS ARTICLE RIGHT NOW BECAUSE WE MESSED IT UP.'' I tried looking the the edit histories, but I can't figure out the real edits from the vandalism, maybe it should be protected until someone who knows something about it gets a chance to get on it.«»](<sup>]</sup> <sub>]</sub>) 04:17, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
*Someone fixed the article. If the vandalism continues, please send me a note. - ]|] 13:32, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
::{{RFPP|d}} problems appear to be resolved ] 14:12, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

===={{la|Cuban Missile Crisis}}====
'''Semi protection''' This article is prone to vandalism by anonymous users. In the last three days, only one change has not been reverted as vandalism. -- ] 03:44, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
:{{RFPP|s}} multiple IP vandalsim ] 14:08, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

===={{La|Kofun period}}====
'''Full Protection''' Continuous vandalism from ] and his obvious anonymous IP's. ] 00:58, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
:{{RFPP|p}} ongoing edit war ] 13:53, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

==Current requests for unprotection==
{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/URheading}}
<!--##############################################################
PLEASE PLACE NEW REQUESTS AT THE TOP OF THIS SECTION!

Add ===={{La|THE ARTICLE NAME}}====as the request title

###############Please only edit below this line.###############-->

===={{La|Polonium}}====
Unprotection requested yesterday, declined with suggestion of seeking consensus on the talk page. A request posted the talk page at that time has gotten no responses at all, i.e. nobody there has supported keeping it protected, much less there being consensus for protection. So I think it should be unprotected. In general, pages should be unprotected unless there's consensus to protect, not the other way around. ] 06:37, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
*{{RFPP|nu}} The article was semi-protected because it was subject to vandalism by anonymous users. Registered users can still edit it. Since Polonium is in the news it is reasonable to assume the vandalism is going to continue for a while. - ]|] 13:35, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

==Current requests for significant edits to a protected page==
{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/SRheading}}
<!--##############################################################
PLEASE PLACE NEW REQUESTS AT THE TOP OF THIS SECTION!

Add ===={{La|THE ARTICLE NAME}}====as the request title

###############Please only edit below this line.###############-->

===={{La|Breast implant}}====

Last night I requested that the Breast Implant article be unprotected because the protected version is NPOV and contains numerous factual errors. The protected version was drastically revised by a plastic surgeon who deleted almost any mention of implant problems, even from peer-reviewed published research and FDA regulatory guidelines. The protected version also includes promotional web sites where plastic surgeons pay to be listed -- thus turning this article into unpaid advertisements for specific doctors.<p>

I explained several of the errors, omisions, and problems on the Discussion page. Several readers agreed with me. At one point the article was unprotected and someone (not me) reverted it back to a better version of the article that I had worked on. Success! Several people agreed with the new, more accurate version, including 2 doctors, a public health professional, and others who didn't identify their expertise. <p>

Then a little while later, it was reverted back to the inaccurate, biased version and protected by Samir, a monitor (I think) who tells us to "duke it out." Of course, we can't duke it out, because the plastic surgeon who wrote the current version is happy that it is protected and has no incentive to compromise. He won't listen to reason, even when we give him direct quotes from the articles he has cited incorrectly. <p>

I'm also confused by the notion of "duking it out." This is a medical article, not a movie review. If a statement is factually untrue it should be corrected regardless of how many people think the statement is accurate and how good they are at duking it out. <p>

As a former faculty member at Yale and Vassar, and current director of a research institute, I have published on this issue and other health issues. I would be glad to explain every edit that needs to be made. Can you help me to improve the article and then protect it from future vandalism? Misplaced Pages will lose good editors if their hard work is ignored and they are told to "duke it out." ] 00:02, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
:This page was protected after the following series of reversions over a 24 hour period: , , , , , , , , . I think discussion needs to take place here. Even a casual glance at ] and the numerous ad hominem attacks against myself for protecting this page will show that "duking it out" is an apt synopsis of what's going on at that article -- ] 03:15, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

==Fulfilled/denied requests==
===={{la|Francesco Patrizi}}====
'''Protection''' Unsupported nationalistic edits by ]. This user inisist to inpose Nationalistic POV in several Dalmatia related article. --] 13:56, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
:{{RFPP|b}}. Edit warring users blocked by another admin. -- ] 22:37, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

===={{La|Gracenote}}====
Severe edit war. Was semi-protected for a while, which effectively only stopped one side of the edit war. A mediation request has been filed, but not responded to. ~ ''''']'''''<sup>(]|])</sup> 22:04, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
:{{RFPP|d}}. There hasn't been much protection-requiring warring for a few days. Re-request if it starts up again. -- ] 22:39, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

===={{la|Whitty Street}}====
Lots of previous vandalism --] 21:46, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
:{{RFPP|nea}} -- ] 21:47, 29 November 2006 (UTC)


===={{la|Motorola RAZR V3}}====
'''Full protection''' The article is already semi-protected because of a user repeatedly spamming modding links. Said individual has indicated that he will continue adding said links, and has registered an account to get around semi-protection. ] 03:23, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
:Wouldn't banning the account then be the better action? -] <small><sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub></small> 03:30, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
::He's already gone through three or four anon. IPs; I wouldn't expect a name ban to slow him down very much. ] 03:36, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

===={{la|Leonardo da Vinci}}====
'''Semi-protection''' the article is constantly attacked by anonymous IP vandals.] <font color="purple">]</font> 02:59, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

:{{RFPP|s}}--] <sup>(])</sup> 03:44, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

===={{la|Sweetest Day}}====
'''Protection''' The Sweetest Day article is under seige by anonymous editors who are removing content. Please protect all images linked to the Sweetest Day page through these photos: . Thank you. ] 23:51, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

:Just a sidenote, this looks more like an edit war. ] 00:28, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
::It's sophisticated '''vandalism''' disguised as an edit war. ] 00:47, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
:::No, this is one editor refusing to acknowledge that consensus is against him. There is no reason to protect this.--] 01:08, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
::::Agree with Isotope. See also ] for more history. ] 01:12, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
:::::These editors are maintaining the Sweetest Day article as a promotional tool for industry. Sorry, I thought Misplaced Pages was an encyclopedia. My mistake. ] 02:24, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
::::::For the record, I have no connection to, nor do I care about, the industry surrounding Sweetest Day. ] 03:58, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
* What has been happening on the ] page is the most highly deceptive form ] possible. It has really opened my eyes to the ] issues facing Misplaced Pages. Just read to see what images and '''facts''' are being edited out of the article. Keep in mind that many of the "grainy images" have news articles attached to them, news articles which clearly demonstrate how Sweetest Day really began. Industry is using Misplaced Pages to rewrite America's history in order to sell products. Not very encyclopedic, in my opinion. Again, please protect and allow a truly encyclopedic and comprehensive article about Sweetest Day to be created on Misplaced Pages. Improved quality images are on the way. ] 06:05, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
::Could I comment the IP address is static, so further warnings and if appropriate blocks could be used, instead of semi-page protection? ] 11:12, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

===={{la|ECW December to Dismember}}====
'''Semi-Protection''' For the same reason as WWE Armageddon. This happens with just about every WWE PPV. ] 01:01, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

:] '''Semi-protected''' due to heavy ]. ''']]''' 01:44, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

===={{La|Westboro Baptist Church}}====
'''Semi-Protection''' Continuous vandalism from different IP addresses. ] 00:47, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

:] '''Semi-protected''' due to heavy ]. ''']]''' 01:42, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

===={{la|Lady Sovereign}}====
'''Semi-Protection''' Already had to re-create the page once. Very heavy vandalism, mostly done by random IPs. ] 00:25, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

:] '''Semi-protected''' due to heavy ]. ''']]''' 01:42, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

===={{la|Spinosaurus}}====
'''Semi-Protection''' - This is my first request ever, so sorry if I get the formatting wrong. This article has been a reverting zone between a few (or possibly one editor using many) ip addresses & a few new users, & experienced editors who are frequent on the dinosaur scene, such as ]. I'm requesting a semi-protection as the constant addition of wrong information to the Spinosaurus article is tiresome to constantly revert & is harmful to the article. The editors who are writing the article are experienced in the field of dinosaurs, and have sources. Although the "vandalism" (if you could call it that) has been happeneing in a speradic fashion over a length of time, the ip address's hinderance is becoming an annoyance. It is also confusing newer editors who have seen the page's numerous different editions of information (re: Spinosaurus talk). Anyway, I'll support what ever descision the admin makes that closes this request. Thanks, ] 00:21, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

:] Unfortunately, there is not enough recent activity to ] ] at this time. Just ] and revert any vandalism. ''']]''' 01:45, 30 November 2006 (UTC)


===={{La|Asuka period}}====
'''Full Protection''' Continuous vandalism from ] and his obvious anonymous IP's. ] 00:58, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
:I think a block of the user would be better... Erm, am I allowed to say anything on this page? ] 01:13, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
:Ummm... Why is this in this section? I'm not an admin, so I can't block anyone or protect anything lol... ? ] 01:33, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

===={{la|WWE Armageddon}}====
'''Semi-Protection''' The same thing that happens with almost every WWE PPV article starting a few weeks before the event, anon IP's and new users keep adding in rumored matches and matches announced during TV tapings despite the fact that there always a warning there saying not to add in matches that haven't been announced on TV or the companie's website. ] 00:44, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
:{{RFPP|s}} -- ] 00:48, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

===={{la|Blood}}====
'''Semi-protection''' Consistent anonymous vandalism ] 00:21, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

:] There is not enough recent activity to ] ] at this time. Just ] and revert any vandalism. ''']]''' 00:38, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

===={{la|Edgar Allen Poe}}====
'''SemiProtection''' - heavy vandalism. ]<sup>]]</sup> 00:18, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

:] '''Semi-protected''' due to heavy ]. ''']]''' 00:37, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

===={{la|women}}====
semi-protect.lots of sexist/misogynist vandalism from ips.] 23:32, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

:] '''Semi-protected''' due to heavy ]. ''']]''' 00:35, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 19:15, 24 December 2024

Wikimedia noticeboard for requesting protection of pages "WP:RFP" and "WP:RPP" redirect here. You may also be looking for Misplaced Pages:Requests for permissions, Misplaced Pages:Requesting copyright permission, or Misplaced Pages:Random page patrol.
Noticeboards
Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes.
General
Articles and content
Page handling
User conduct
Other
Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards
    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.
    Shortcuts

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Skip to requests for protection
    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level Request protection
    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level Request unprotection
    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here Request edit
    this header: view • edit



    Archives

    2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024



    Current requests for increase in protection level

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level Request protection Shortcuts

    Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


    Lyal S. Sunga

    Reason: Introduction of misleading and inaccurate information on a persistent basis by one user "Jlanansh" who insists on changes to the biography of Lyal S. Sunga, despite the fact that the page has been up for years and has been edited and backed up by authoritative sources without previous difficulty. This is a case of vandalism. 101.56.25.252 (talk) 14:48, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

    Question: Have you attempted to communicate with the editor? I see no template or discussion about this in pagetalk or usertalk. BusterD (talk) 18:50, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
    User:Jlanansh seems to have started a talk thread entitled COI, and had one dismissive reply (from the ip requester here) which didn't engage on the (unsourced) accusation. If I'm reading correctly, Jlanansh hasn't edited the page since they posted the talk thread. BusterD (talk) 18:58, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
    Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. BusterD (talk) 19:02, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

    Pocoyo

    Reason: Too much vandalism in page; Adding in fake networks, airdates, and episode titles. Kiff Chatterly (talk) 15:19, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

    Teja Sajja

    Reason: IP ADDRESS Wantedly targeting DOB of Teja Sajja. Despite multiple undo attempts repeated vandalism continues. Hakuna matatya (talk) 17:05, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

    Battle of Pipli Sahib

    Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Paramandyr (talk) 17:25, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

    User(s) blocked: 2a02:c7c:6601:d000::/64 (talk · contribs). Block extended and promoted from partial to site-wide. Favonian (talk) 18:21, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

    Battle of Jamrud

    Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Paramandyr (talk) 17:35, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

    User(s) blocked: 2a02:c7c:6601:d000::/64 (talk · contribs). Block extended and promoted from partial to site-wide. Favonian (talk) 18:22, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

    Current requests for reduction in protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level Request unprotection Shortcuts

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Shortcuts

    Lil Dicky

    Reason: Lil Dicky was semi-protected back in 2019. Now that five years have passed, could the semi-protection be lifted? 174.93.89.27 (talk) 19:19, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

    Pinging @Materialscientist --Ahecht (TALK
    PAGE    ) 19:43, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
    Ahecht, Materialscientist has disabled pings according to their talk page. 174.93.89.27, please ask the protecting administrator on their talk page before making a request for unprotection here. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:06, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
    Not done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:06, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

    Current requests for edits to a protected page

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here Request edit Shortcut

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Misplaced Pages:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Misplaced Pages:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
    Further information: Misplaced Pages:Edit requests


    Israel–Hamas war

    Change 16,000 civilians (May 2024) to 16,000 civilians (May 2024)

    Source 42 has these numbers and source 43 doesn't Alderman pained dios finnish (talk) 18:48, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

    Handled requests

    A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/Archive.