| Revision as of 15:54, 30 November 2006 editPluto.2006 (talk | contribs)201 edits →Edit war← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 11:09, 10 July 2024 edit undoQwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs)Bots, Mass message senders4,012,747 editsm Removed deprecated parameters in {{Talk header}} that are now handled automatically (Task 30)Tag: paws [2.2] |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{Talk header|search=yes}} |
|
{{controversial}} |
|
{{controversial}} |
|
{{Calm talk}} |
|
{{Calm}} |
|
|
{{Round in circles}} |
|
{{WP India|class=B|importance=top|auto=yes}} |
|
|
|
{{Article history|action1=FAC |
|
{{fac-contested}} |
|
|
|
|action1result=not promoted |
|
{| class="infobox" width="150" |
|
|
|
|action1date=2004-08-27, 07:01:14 |
|
|- align="center" |
|
|
|
|action1oldid=5528036 |
|
| ] |
|
|
|
|action1link=Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/Archived nominations/Index/July 2004#Carnatic music |
|
''']''' |
|
|
|
|currentstatus=FFAC}} |
|
---- |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|1= |
|
|- align="center" |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject India|importance=mid|music=yes|music-importance=Top|telangana=yes|telangana-importance=high}} |
|
| ] ] |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Music/Music genres task force}} |
|
|} |
|
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|
|archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}} |
|
|
|maxarchivesize = 150K |
|
|
|counter = 5 |
|
|
|minthreadsleft = 3 |
|
|
|minthreadstoarchive = 2 |
|
|
|algo = old(180d) |
|
|
|archive = Talk:Carnatic music/Archive %(counter)d |
|
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Semi-protected edit request on 28 December 2022 == |
|
== Article ] '''should be article of Carnatic music''' == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{Edit semi-protected|Carnatic music|answered=yes}} |
|
Article ] '''should be article of Carnatic music''' not for article of modern artist. I found lot of and repeated images of same person. If any body would like please put images particular person's article. Other wise Quality of article should be Stub. I feel somebody trying to put some unfamiliar composers images to show they are very famous. |
|
|
|
Hello, the line 'Most compositions are in Kannada and Tamil, with a few in Telugu, Malayalam and Sanskrit.'is making a complete misunderstanding in the entire carnatic music and telugu community. The majority of the carnatic compositions are in telugu language, and I'm not sure why here this was misinterpreted. The trio of carnatic music are from telugu language community. The great Annamacharya, Tyagaraja, Shyama Sastri, Ramadasa, Mysore vasudevachar, Sadasiva brahmendra, and many more whose keertanas are being performed at the majority of carnatic festivals and these are in TELUGU Language. So, how it was mentioned that 'few in telugu'? Please replace this phrase on a priority basis. ] (]) 04:50, 28 December 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
:] '''Not done:''' please provide ] that support the change you want to be made.<!-- Template:ESp --> ] (]) 16:36, 28 December 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
::Please find the relevant information in the below articles. |
|
|
::Carnatic Music Book1 (Complete).pdf (nios.ac.in) |
|
|
::Telugu is an apt language for classical music: Vishaka Hari | Events Movie News - Times of India (indiatimes.com) |
|
|
::Trinity of Carnatic music - Misplaced Pages |
|
|
::List of Carnatic composers - Misplaced Pages |
|
|
::If you could observe the links above and in particular the list of carnatic composers languages section, you can see how many 'TELUGU' language compositions are available and the composers. I again request to change the above language to Telugu first so that it will not get misguided. ] (]) 07:22, 30 December 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,. Waiting for the response ] (]) 18:44, 4 January 2023 (UTC) |
|
And I am afraid of the works of Mr ]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hello Team, I've provided you the required sources. Can you let me know what's causing the delay in updating the data here ??? ] (]) 14:55, 8 January 2023 (UTC) |
|
Rgds ] 11:27, 24 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for updating the correct information regarding language correction ] (]) 06:37, 17 January 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Disruptive edits == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
@ ]. Please check the edits by ] on this page. Not only did he not provide a single source to back up his claim, but actively removed content which has been cited from multiple independent academic sources (both Indian and western). Clear case of disruptive editing. ] (]) 10:02, 30 September 2023 (UTC) |
|
To All, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:The source nowhere mentions the claimed information in the article ] (]) 10:45, 30 September 2023 (UTC) |
|
This is the article of Carnatic muisc not for modern artists. |
|
|
|
::@], @]: The source that seems central to one of the edits doesn't seem to support anything in the related paragraph. We may need a deeper discussion about how much material is unsourced and in need of removal. —''']''' (]) 18:31, 1 October 2023 (UTC) |
|
] 05:48, 25 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
:: Vijaya Ramaswamy does mention Telugu predominating in the evolution of Carnatic music. Another one mentions that most compositions are in Telugu and Sanskrit. That is what is written in those sentences. ] (]) 06:14, 4 October 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Karnataka folk song main points == |
|
Images aren't a necessity for this article, and why some musicians get their images over others is also another issue. For now, until this is resolved, I shall delete the images. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please ] (]) 12:00, 7 November 2023 (UTC) |
|
If DKP's credit for being the first female to sing RTP on stage is ommitted, then descriptions of both MSS and Brinda, as well as Jon B Higgins will be deleted. |
|
|
|
|
|
This is the only fair way to handle it. ] 06:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
Yes you are correct, this is article of Carnatic music not modern artists or Vocalist. |
|
|
] 07:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I guess both the above are ]s of a single user. Destructive edits are reprehensible and people can get banned for not following wikipedia's policies. Kindly read ] and ]. <span class="sigSrkris" style="background:gold;color:#FF0000"><big>ॐ</big> ] (] | ])</span> 12:30, 25 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
I believe you're now guilty of defamation. ] 06:22, 26 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think we need an admin to protect this page from edit-warring and destructive edits made by a few members. <span class="sigSrkris" style="background:gold;color:#FF0000"><big>ॐ</big> ] (] | ])</span> 08:59, 26 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
Haha, I am guilty of defamation for thinking aloud that ] might be your ]? ROTFL <span class="sigSrkris" style="background:gold;color:#FF0000"><big>ॐ</big> ] (] | ])</span> 09:24, 26 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To Admin/ All |
|
|
|
|
|
'''User ]''' misusing his power to edit in wikipedia. His comments is like the comments in stupid message boards. This kind of work have to stop. |
|
|
What I done for this article is that I removed some images, and external link from this article . Here each user trying to put images of some vocalist to show that they are famous. If it continues all users will put to show their friends and relatives who belong to carnatic music. So it will became the article of Vocalist. |
|
|
I found that the link I removed from the wikipedia may be the personal website of user ]. And some images removed by me was also uploaded by him. That made him hatred against me. I have no relation with ]. And requesting to take action against user ] by calling me ]. |
|
|
|
|
|
I suggesting is that wikipeida is not a private website of any users. |
|
|
by ] 05:12, 27 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== READ before making further changes please == |
|
|
|
|
|
There are several issues that need to be discussed with respect to this article. These involve external links, modern artists, images and nature and learning of Carnatic music. Until consensus is reached on these topics, please avoid making edits (especially contestable ones) in those areas especially. |
|
|
|
|
|
1) External links - the issue is of what is acceptable and what is not. |
|
|
|
|
|
2) Modern artists - the issue is whether to include extra information about female yesteryear artists or not, and whether to include information on Jon Higgins. (if we do include this info, where do we draw the line? if we don't, are we just listing artists?) |
|
|
|
|
|
3) Images - whether it is neutral, appropriate and relevant to include images of modern artists throughout the Carnatic music page. The pictures that were up: |
|
|
|
|
|
a) MSS EMI Record Cover |
|
|
b) Ariyakudi |
|
|
c) DKP and DKJ with respect to RTP |
|
|
d) DK Pattammal |
|
|
e) Madurai Mani Iyer |
|
|
f) concert pics including mysore v and palghat, balamuralikrishna, and n.ramani |
|
|
g) Chembai |
|
|
h) Balamuralikrishna |
|
|
i) Jon B Higgins |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
] 07:43, 26 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With respect to 1), see ]. |
|
|
|
|
|
With respect to 3), pictures are avoidable altogether. There are so many composers and musicians to provide a netural point of view by just providing images of a few of them, exclusively, over others. Perhaps the only picture that is neutral in its inclusion is the tanpura - this I will leave up to someone else to insert, hopefully in the appropriate section of the article. |
|
|
|
|
|
] 02:50, 27 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:According to ] "Articles that use more than one image should present a variety of material near relevant text." In this context would you object to the use of some images located near relevant text? ] 11:34, 28 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
::I might, depending on the circumstances. Could you specify such circumstances? |
|
|
|
|
|
::My idea for the modern artists section was adding the image of the first artist mentioned per para. (considering Purandaradasar -first mentioned composer- was added in the composers section as opposed to the Trinity). A couple of people disagreed, one insisting I was undoing their painstaking work without remaining neutral. So all contentious images (which aren't a necessity for the article in the first place) have been removed unless/until consensus is reached to maintain ]. |
|
|
|
|
|
::In the context of your quote however, it may be fair to insert an image of a faceless musician putting anudhrutham (tAlA) with their hands OR in the concerts sections (or shruti section) inserting an image of a tanpura....] 01:38, 29 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:::I suggest you have a look at the ] and ] articles to see how ] has been interpreted. ] 12:52, 29 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
I can plainly say I have prior experience with certain users outside wikipedia, and they are upto no good. I would urge every serious editor to check the antecedents of users to find their nature of contributions and use it to understand them better. This is not a tirade on any particular user, but yes, it helps to identify trolls. I am sorry if this personally offends anyone, because that was not what I intended to do. Thanks <span class="sigSrkris" style="background:gold;color:#FF0000"><big>ॐ</big> ] (] | ])</span> 14:46, 30 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Removal of vernacular scripts == |
|
|
|
|
|
User Srkris unilaterally removed all the south Indian scripts from the article on (labelling it a 'minor edit!) without discussing his actions in the talk pages. As this a collaborative project any such actions need to be discussed and consensus reached in the talk pages. However there is an ongoing discussion at the Village pump regarding the usefulness of these vernacular scripts in an English language encyclopedia. Until this issue is resolved, and to maintain neutrality, I'm removing Sanskrit also from the article. This article is not about the Sanskrit term, rather it is about Carnatic music. Thanks ] <sup><em>]/]</em></sup> 19:08, 28 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
Karnataka Sangeetham (both words) are sanskrit, so sanskrit's inclusion appears fine. However this is not an etymology 101 class to include the same thing in all vernaculars. This is not only 90% useless (being unreadable), its also like making the same thing said in several languages just to make it appear politically correct. |
|
|
|
|
|
Secondly, I '''did not''' remove any content. I merely commented the relevant text out. The text is still there in the edit page and can be displayed once the comments are removed. Some people who probably hate sanskrit might have a problem including it without including their other favourite languages. Other than this, I dont think there's any purpose served by inclusion of all languages. <span class="sigSrkris" style="background:gold;color:#FF0000"><big>ॐ</big> ] (] | ])</span> 19:59, 28 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:The title of the article is "Carnatic music" and not ''Karnataka Sangeetham''. Sanskrit is equally unreadable to 99.999999% of the population of this world. In this scale keeping Sanskrit is also useless. I am not in favour of ''any'' vernacular scripts in any English language article. They only lead to useless and non-productive arguments. |
|
|
:Whether you used the html hide tag or deleted the scripts is irrelevant to the outcome. You removed them from the article without discussion and marking the edit a minor one. I would recommend you not to make any unfounded assumptions about other editors' likes and dislikes. Keep the discussion to the subject in hand. Thanks |
|
|
:] <sup><em>]/]</em></sup> 21:48, 28 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dear Parthi, |
|
|
|
|
|
I am sorry that, I am a Keralaite, In Kerala we saying '''Karnataka Sangeetham |
|
|
''', I know Sanskrit. In Sanskrit It also saying '''Karnataka Sangeetham |
|
|
'''. I think In Telugu Also it saying same as '''Karnataka Sangeetham'''. I an very neighbor to Tamil Nadu but I don't know how pronounce in Tamil Karnatka santham/ Carnatic music. |
|
|
|
|
|
There was an spelling mistake in Sanskrit text. It was pronunce like Karnataka sangeeth (in Hindi)or "sangeetha" (in sanskrit). |
|
|
But I think that was mistake by some who know Hindi. |
|
|
|
|
|
I know your Passion of Tamil Language. But we have to tolerate with all language. |
|
|
Carnatic music and Karnataka Sangeetham is same as Madras and Chennai. or Cochin and Kochi. |
|
|
Carnatic music is the colonial name of Karnataka Sangeetham. |
|
|
|
|
|
] 04:41, 29 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::], whether I have a passion for Tamil or not is irrelevant. I don't hate any language. the point under discussion is whether Sanskrit should remain in the article when the rest of the south Indian scripts were removed unilaterally. The name of the article is '''Carnatic music''', which is a recognised English name. We don't need any script other than English on this page. Thanks- ] <sup><em>]/]</em></sup> 05:11, 29 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::I have nothing against Sanskrit, but I hate people 'piggybacking' Hindi on Sanskrit into many Hindu/Sanskrit related articles. I am '''sure''' that this is '''NOT''' the case on this article, but still, I am for either using ''all'' scripts or not using ''any'' vernacular script. IMO, the Devanagari script(not Sanskrit) is ''least'' representative of Carnatic music. ] 22:08, 28 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:::Personally, I think, where possible, sticking to English (and no vernacular script) is the way to go. However, this bit doesn't bother me as most people skip it when reading - usually because they don't understand....] 01:42, 29 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is commonly called "karnataka sangeetham" by everyone who knows anything about carnatic music. '''Its a very common term, and is in fact the commonest term'''. '''Obviously English Misplaced Pages will have its article names in english''', but that is no reason not to include the most common native term by which it is called. '''And it is in Sanskrit, so it is represented in its own script'''. I see no problems so far! '''Problems arise only when people find a need to push their own languages''' just because sanskrit happens to be there. I'm a tamil myself, and '''I feel nothing is wrong in having only sanskrit, and not having a pressing need to say the same thing in all vernacular scripts''' <span class="sigSrkris" style="background:gold;color:#FF0000"><big>ॐ</big> ] (] | ])</span> 15:04, 29 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
::The title of the article says '''Carnatic music''' and that is sufficient. What it is known as in other languages need not appear in the lead paragraph. If you want you can insert an infobox with other scripts and transliterations. Again let me patiently recommend you not to assume anything on the likes and dislikes of other editors. Don't use words you may have to retract. - ] <sup><em>]/]</em></sup> 19:08, 29 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
There is a discussion going on in village pump, and the majority votes are to include the main native script relating to the Indian articles, neither to include many relevant scripts, nor to not include any script. As such, two or three minority users cant force their opinions on the rest like this! <span class="sigSrkris" style="background:gold;color:#FF0000"><big>ॐ</big> ] (] | ])</span> 14:41, 30 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Repeated addition of www.rasiakas.org in the EL section == |
|
|
|
|
|
According to ] links to forum websites are to be avoided. ] specifically forbids inclusion of websites owned by one of the editors of the article. The website in question breaks both these guidelines. Whether this website adds value to this article may be determined by the following guidelines: |
|
|
#Articles about any organization, person, web site, or other entity should link to the official site if any. |
|
|
#An article about a book, a musical score, or some other media should link to a site hosting a copy of the work if none of the "Links normally to be avoided" criteria apply. |
|
|
#Sites that contain neutral and accurate material that cannot be integrated into the Misplaced Pages article due to copyright issues, amount of detail (such as professional athlete statistics, movie or television credits, interview transcripts, or online textbooks) or other reasons. |
|
|
#Sites with other meaningful, relevant content that is not suitable for inclusion in an article, such as reviews and interviews. |
|
|
|
|
|
IMO the site does not meet any of this. I am a member of this forum and all I see is what happens in any forum. There are other reputed sources for carnatic music than a forum. |
|
|
- ] <sup><em>]/]</em></sup> 19:33, 28 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have told already, both personally and publicly to those concerned, that: |
|
|
|
|
|
1. Misplaced Pages does not prohibit an editor's website from being included as an external link by a third party.<br> |
|
|
2. The website in question is not referenced in the article in any way to compromise NPOV<br> |
|
|
3. It is not a forum website. It is a website which also includes a forum, among other non-forum content. Again forum thread reference is not an issue here at all. Else all websites containing forums should be debarred?<br> |
|
|
4. None of the other policies of Misplaced Pages are broken by its inclusion.<br> |
|
|
5. What is a genuine or reliable website is anyone's lookout, its merely a perception, not an empirical fact. I dont think my website includes any propoganda material or illegal stuff. |
|
|
|
|
|
Anyone can check that both the times it was included (and removed), it was not I who pushed for it or included it. |
|
|
|
|
|
Removing the link therefore, appears to me to be motivated by other extraneous considerations not having anything to do with wikipedia's policies. <span class="sigSrkris" style="background:gold;color:#FF0000"><big>ॐ</big> ] (] | ])</span> 19:50, 28 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
::*But you are pushing for its reinclusion. |
|
|
::*It is irrelevant how this site is dressed up. The introductory page of this site defines itself as "This site is about discussions and sharing of knowledge about Indian music." - meaning this is a discussion forum. It also requires registration to participate. |
|
|
::*The website does not add any neutral information that is not already contained in the article. All the information contained in the site is discussion between members on the subject of music. |
|
|
::*The inclusion of the link breaks ], ] |
|
|
::] <sup><em>]/]</em></sup> 22:05, 28 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Agree with ], according to ] "use of Misplaced Pages to link to a website that you own, maintain or are acting as an agent for is strongly recommended against". ] 22:11, 28 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::::Unfortunately, rasikas is primarily a forum with other stuff running off it, which is quite the contrary when compared to a site like Carnatica. The other issue is with neutrality. At previous moments, and at this moment in time, I'm sorry to say that the link is inappropriate for this article. ] 01:58, 29 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*'''Please note that pushing for its exclusion and pushing for its inclusion are both "pushing", and one is no better than the other'''. The only fact that remains is that it was twice added to EL by outsiders, and both times removed on flimsy grounds or misunderstanding. |
|
|
*Words mean nothing, '''substance should be over for'''m. The website contains non-forum content also. It is not a forum website, but a website on music that also happens to contain a forum. Merely because forum appears to be conspicous is not enough to call it a forum website. |
|
|
*It is clear that the website is not a propoganda website, and it is also clear that '''external links exist mainly for content that cant be included on wikipedia due to various reasons'''. |
|
|
*Any new user would immediately parrot wikipedia's guidelines without understanding the issue. We all know the guidelines. Its not I who put the link to my website in the first place. I am seeking objectivity and fairness. Its so easy to dismiss my views thinking "he's pushing for his website". '''It takes real objectivity to understand that I am asking for objectivity'''. Its a vicious circle. Some dont understand while some pretend to not understand <span class="sigSrkris" style="background:gold;color:#FF0000"><big>ॐ</big> ] (] | ])</span> 14:53, 29 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::As an interested party, your pushing for the reinclusion of the link is in violation of ]. WP guidelines are not there to pick and choose. They are there to maintain the integrity of the project. Two members (myself and Vocalist) of the forum have openly stated here that it is simply a forum website and not a website containing a forum. Forums are to avoided because of the unreliable information that tend to be found there. Thanks - ] <sup><em>]/]</em></sup> 19:13, 29 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Looking at the link, it does appear to be a chat forum. Could you detail what useful information is contained? ] 19:21, 29 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Let's briefly see what this non-forum form website contains other than the forum: |
|
|
:::*An events calendar |
|
|
:::*An occasional blog by Srkris |
|
|
:::*List of links |
|
|
:::How is this relevant to the article? -] <sup><em>]/]</em></sup> 00:31, 30 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
::::In order to understand the background to this issue, it will be useful to highlight ]'s past actions regarding this link. This user has a habit of to his articles. I have been watching his to see where else he . |
|
|
::::Regards ] <sup><em>]/]</em></sup> 21:13, 29 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::::::User Venu, When you explain the background, do it properly. Interested users may see User Venu's contribution . Now It's been 1-2 months User venu with the support of an admin started his wiki-stalking against User:kris .User:venu should stop this and should keep wikipedia off his personal disputes.-] 07:41, 30 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::User Bharatveer why don't you complain against me like your friend Srkris did? All can see how Srkris's complaint turned out and . - ] <sup><em>]/]</em></sup> 09:39, 30 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::::::::As a general note for all 3 concerned Wikipedians, I do wish this would be a place NOT for personal disputes. '''Please assume good faith and civility with other editors''', at least from now. The URL in question is contestable from both sides, with some valid arguments on either side. As a general note, external links should be kept to a minimum. If someone (not anyone in particular!) wants to include rasikas.org without going into dispute resolution etc., then the next step is to specify the link further to the relevant material (eg;, rasikas.org/Purandaradasar or Carnatica.net/Music Handbook - IF SUCH LINKS EXISTED). Otherwise, such links will need to be deleted. The options are there. Take your pick. ] 10:40, 30 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Venu62 is pushing for its exclusion since the very beginning and he does appear to have a vested interest against its inclusion, I have also in the past complained against his ] and harassment tactics, and I feel this is one way where he loves to play the devil's advocate against me. There seems to be a deliberate attempt to mask his perceived bad-faith actions by quoting wikipedia's guidelines out of their spirit. Ncmvocalist is long known to me as a member in the forum of the website under discussion and he is not in my good books, so there is no wonder he allies with Venu. A4ay's history on Misplaced Pages (as well as those of Ncmvocalist) are very clear from their contributions and talk pages, and I would urge Addhoc to see their history before treating all these editors as genuine folks. |
|
|
|
|
|
'''Besides all this, the link being repeatedly removed does not violate any of wikipedia's policies, and stands on its own merits. I would request Addhoc to point at any violations and I can suitably convince him/her that there is no violation involved. I am not prepared to answer the others since each has an axe to grind against me.''' <span class="sigSrkris" style="background:gold;color:#FF0000"><big>ॐ</big> ] (] | ])</span> 14:35, 30 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Changes to capitalisation == |
|
|
|
|
|
Refer to ]... ] 15:20, 29 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Edit war == |
|
|
|
|
|
Could I suggest this edit war is a waste of time. If there are two sides in a dispute, one side attempting to include several images and the other side hoping not to include any, eventually there is going to be a compromise of just including a few. Pretending otherwise and continuing the edit war is pointless. In this context, could we agree on an interim compromise of including two images? ] 19:05, 29 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah.... ] 10:10, 30 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I am sorry to say that some people simply remove images without seeking other longtime editors views, besides doing a lot of objectionable things here, and when they are taken to task for their actions, they pretend to suddenly act civil without realizing that they were once pushing for inclusion of other images which were equally irrelevant. Although I agree that relevant sections in the article should have corresponding images, I am amused to see crocodiles shedding tears. Having said that, I support addhoc and appreciate his help in his efforts to mediate a solution. <span class="sigSrkris" style="background:gold;color:#FF0000"><big>ॐ</big> ] (] | ])</span> 14:54, 30 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi All, |
|
|
I won't support user ]. Because It is very easy to understand that his aim is that make ] as a great. Actually Chembai is great but his works will make hatred against him. |
|
|
|
|
|
His first works in wikipeida was '''Uploading ]'s image'''. Second is '''replacing trinity images with chembai's image'''. Third is Put '''URL of checmai's website'''. He also put not only chembai's but also '''a website rasika.org''' in almost all articles. And he edited about ] lot of things in article ]. These are his first works of user ]. It is sure either he is a fan or a relative of ]. What ever be any body have any doubt check his oldest works in History.You can see lot of Chembai's images in lot of article. Just look at ] article , You can see the image of chembai again. What is the important of that iamge ? there with a big size. |
|
|
|
|
|
] 15:54, 30 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
Hello, the line 'Most compositions are in Kannada and Tamil, with a few in Telugu, Malayalam and Sanskrit.'is making a complete misunderstanding in the entire carnatic music and telugu community. The majority of the carnatic compositions are in telugu language, and I'm not sure why here this was misinterpreted. The trio of carnatic music are from telugu language community. The great Annamacharya, Tyagaraja, Shyama Sastri, Ramadasa, Mysore vasudevachar, Sadasiva brahmendra, and many more whose keertanas are being performed at the majority of carnatic festivals and these are in TELUGU Language. So, how it was mentioned that 'few in telugu'? Please replace this phrase on a priority basis. 124.123.172.49 (talk) 04:50, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
Hello Team, I've provided you the required sources. Can you let me know what's causing the delay in updating the data here ??? Raghu0007128 (talk) 14:55, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Highway 89 (talk) 16:36, 28 December 2022 (UTC)