User talk:Kendrick7: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 22:19, 30 November 2006 editJoshuaZ (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers31,657 edits Daniel's edit← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 19:15, 15 July 2024 edit undoIvanvector (talk \| contribs)Checkusers, Administrators52,139 edits Notification: listing of How the sausage gets made at WP:Redirects for discussion.Tag: Twinkle
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{not around\|3=16 May 2021}}
	<!-- BEGIN WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE --><!-- This page is automatically archived by Werdnabot-->{{User:Werdnabot/Archiver/Linkhere}} <!--This is an empty template, but transcluding it counts as a link, meaning Werdnabot is directed to this page - DO NOT SUBST IT --><!--Werdnabot-Archive Age-(90) DoUnreplied-Yes Target-User talk:Kendrick7/Archive/{{CURRENTMONTHABBREV})--><!--END WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE-->
			{{Tutnum IV}}

	{\| class="infobox" width="150"		{\| class="infobox" width="150"
	\|- align="center"		\|- align="center"
	\| ]		\| ]
			'''Archive'''
	''']'''
	----		----
	\|- align="center"		\|- align="center"
	\| ]		\| ]
			\|- align="center"
			\| ]
			\|- align="center"
			\| ]
			\|- align="center"
			\| ]
			\|- align="center"
			\| ]
			\|- align="center"
			\| ]
			\|- align="center"
			\| ]
			\|- align="center"
			\| ]
			\|- align="center"
			\| ]
			\|- align="center"
			\| ]
			\|- align="center"
			\| ]
			\|- align="center"
			\| ]
			\|- align="center"
			\| ]
			\|- align="center"
			\| ]
	\|}		\|}
	{\| class="messagebox" style="background: SkyBlue;"		{\| class="messagebox" style="background: SkyBlue;"
	\|-
	\|{{message}}
	\|-		\|-
	\|}		\|}

			== ] of ] ==
	== Re:deleted talk section ==
			]

			The article ] has been ] because of the following concern:
	Its not up to you to decide what can and cannot remain on a talk page. Removing discussion like you just did can result in a block. Do not attempt to pull such a stunt again.- ] \| ] 17:29, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
			<blockquote>'''Only passing mentions, no significant coverage that I could find.'''</blockquote>

			While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
	:I don't think you in any way committed a blockable offense or were trying to pull a stunt. ] 17:42, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

			You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
	:The "asperations" in this case were relevant to the discussion, as it showed that a consistently problematic editor had returned under the guise of a new username trying to cause more of the same kind of problems that he had been for more than 6 months now.- ] \| ] 18:28, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

			Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 17:38, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
	== ] ==
			==] nomination of ]==
			]
			{{Quote box\|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read ].</p><p>You may want to consider using the ] to help you create articles.</p>\|width=20%\|align=right}}
			A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a ], at ]. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

			If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the {{Querylink\|Special:Log\|qs=type=delete&page=Christopher+Heinz\|deleting administrator}}, or if you have already done so, you can place a request ]. <!-- Template:Db-repost-notice --><!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> <span style="color:DarkGray">...</span> ] <sub>]</sub> 17:10, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
	A good book that I am currently reading: ]. Instead of dealing with SlimVirgin directly on a position as what is currently happening with the marriage section, it may be useful to back up and try a different approach. It can be frustrating but if you read the book, it helps with understanding the dynamic. I'm busy until next weekend but after that I'll stop talking so much. --] 23:53, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
	::See also ]. --] 01:36, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

			==Disambiguation link notification for September 27==
	== Idea ==

			An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
	It can be very difficult to add things to the AoIa page (see more removals ) but I have found in the past that it is significantly easier to create and edit pages that provide useful context. An article that outlines the history, development and factors for success (or influence) of the anti-apartheid movement both in South African and in the international community would be very valuable both in outlining history as well as providing a study for what other movements should do, what hurdles to expect and how long the path can be. --] 04:03, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
			:]<!-- ( \| )-->
	:It's all too easy to add junk to the Aola page, though occasionally some of it gets removed as well. The Aola page is already very long, and it doesn't need an explanation of what Apartheid was; Apartheid is likely the most famous system of racial discrimination the world, all the more so because of its current popularity as an epithet. And Misplaced Pages is not a platform for activism, nor should it be used to teach "other movements" what they should do. ]<sup><small><font color="DarkGreen">]</font></small></sup> 04:38, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
			::added a link pointing to ]
	:Deodar was making a suggestion to start a ''new article'' describing the history of the movement to abolish South African apartheid. Absolutely nothing wrong with that. ] 09:24, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
			:]<!-- ( \| )-->
			::added a link pointing to ]

			(].) --] (]) 10:23, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
	== Posting to the Pump ==

			== Notice of neutral point of view noticeboard discussion ==
	OK, thanks. I'm glad you approve. I'll copy/paste it directly to the (Assistance) forum. BTW - it's a real pleasure to have a polite difference of opinion with someone who's behaviour is so eminently reasonable and civil. :) --] <sup>]</sup> 00:14, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

			] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is ].The discussion is about the topic ].<!--Template:NPOVN-notice--> Thank you. ] <small>(please ] on reply)</small> 01:44, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
	I posted it as "Request for opinions". Now I guess we just wait....--] <sup>]</sup> 00:18, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
			== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
			<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].

			The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
	== misleading sections ==

			Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> ] (]) 04:42, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
	Those titles are really misleading, if you think about it. What are we supposed to do with arguments from sources that express no opinion one way or another? -- ]<sup>]</sup> 09:02, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

			== ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message ==
	:I don't understand your question. Can you give me an example of an arguments from a source that does not express an opinion? ] 09:07, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

			<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
	I didn't make the heading more specific because the section itself is a mishmash. It doesn't tell a coherent story. I'll have to think about this some more. ] 17:38, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
			<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y\|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data\|2020\|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

	== Allegations of ... ==

	Sorry for reverting you there. I should have talked first. ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 07:37, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
	:I prefer the facts and concepts first too, I think. Don't worry; we'll get there in the end. :-) ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 07:57, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

	==]==
	There are still some duplications and out of order stuff. Gotta run though. Best. --] 22:41, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

	== A voting? ==

	Look at this: .
	Is it it a force deployment or voting? Please give your opinion about this. --] 20:07, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

	:You know, the problem is that some of them have favored trolling to edit warring. When '''obvious sourced facts''' can not be included in articles, and labeling other editors job as vandalism(for gaining more reverts) becomes regular, what else we can do? Every reasonable and useful information that is added usually removed by them. You know, the main problem with wikipedia '''with enough number of unfaithful editors''' any article can be ruined, and unfortunately this is happening. This really makes wikistress, and for me it's difficult to face this uncivility. Do you remember what's happened to ]? --] 15:11, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

	I though you may want to look at ] if you want to ask questions from Avraham. --] 15:11, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

	== The pen is mightier...in popular culture ==

	I was just thinking if such a section would be appropriate. For example in the 1990 Batman movie the Joker says in a memorable scene: "The pen, is truly mightier than the sword!". I'm sure there are many other examples like that.--] 15:35, 14 November 2006 (UTC)


	==DYK==
	{\| class="messagebox standard-talk"
	\|-
	\|]
	\|On ], ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ].
	\|} <!-- ], ] --> --'']'' <sup>]</sup> 02:30, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

			The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
	== Vandalism warning ==

			If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx\|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. ] (]) 01:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
	Please do not remove content from Misplaced Pages, as you did . It is considered ]. If you would like to experiment, please use the ]. Thank you. <!-- Template:Test2a (Second level warning) --> ←] <sup>]]</sup> 01:36, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
			</td></tr>
	:Another editor, ], deleted the article, as he ]. Sorry for your confusion! -- ]<sup>]</sup> 02:23, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
			</table>
			<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2020/Coordination/MMS/01&oldid=990307860 -->
			== ] of ] ==
			]

			The article ] has been ] because of the following concern:
	== Hamas covenant ==
			<blockquote>'''Does not meet ]'''</blockquote>

			While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
	I agree with your decision to remove the link to "Islamofascism". However, the Hamas covenant most certainly does call for the destruction of Israel.

			You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
	"Israel will exist and will continue to exist until Islam will obliterate it, just as it obliterated others before it."

			Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 00:19, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
	"It strives to raise the banner of Allah over every inch of Palestine," i.e. eliminate the Jewish state standing on it
			== ] of ] ==
			]

			The article ] has been ] because of the following concern:
	"'''There is no solution for the Palestinian question except through Jihad'''. Initiatives, proposals and international conferences are all a waste of time and vain endeavors."
			<blockquote>'''Does not meet ] as notability is not inherited from author.'''</blockquote>

			While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
	Etc., etc. It does not in these specific words say: "our goal is to destroy the State of Israel." But that's what it essentially says. Don't be so ridiculously literal.

			You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
	-Jprg1966

			Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 00:23, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
	Update: Fair enough. I apologize if I mistook your actions for being randomly defensive of Hamas.

			== "Misplaced Pages:FAKENEWS" listed at ] ==
	== Israeli Apartheid ==
			]
			A discussion is taking place to address the redirect ]. The discussion will occur at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> —] (] '''·''' ]) 18:08, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

			== ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message ==
	Can you please help stop the edit wars and take a look?] 20:46, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

			<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
	== Leo Frank ==
			<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y\|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data\|2021\|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

			The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
	Frank was murdered before the entire process could be completed. Take the subject of the film ], Randal Dale Evans, for example. This is a very famous wrongful conviction, his entire appeal process only succeeded in commuting the original death sentence to life imprisonment, after Errol Morris made the film where the actual killer (who was already on death row for another murder) confessed, Randal Dale Evans was released after a new trial. Now suppose that after the first unsuccessful appeal process but before the film, Evans was murdered in prison. By your logic Evans would not have been wrongfully convicted because he was never declared innocent by the court system even though he obviously would have been. I hope you see the parrallels with the case of Leo Frank. The Frank case is not just cited by lay people, it is also famous among legal experts as a wrongful conviction.- ] \| ] 01:47, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

			If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx\|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)</small>
	====
			</td></tr>
			</table>
			<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2021/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1056562944 -->
			== "New Catechism" listed at ] ==
			]
			An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect ] and has thus listed it ]. This discussion will occur at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 01:25, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
			== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
			<div class="afd-notice">
			<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].

			The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
	Please ] 10:27, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

			Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
	==Right==
			<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ]<sup><small style="font-size:80%;">(])</small></sup> 02:26, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
	No one needs me as a spam guard... but when you've got an editor to a CfD it helps to have spam fighters like myself. ''(]])'' 03:02, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
			== "Heavies" listed at ] ==
			]
			An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect ] and has thus listed it ]. This discussion will occur at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 03:32, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

			== ] of ] ==
	== ] ==
			]

			The article ] has been ] because of the following concern:
	Why do you make edit to articles you have no clue about? At least you should have read that article before removing ]. As per your claim that "he led a rebelion against the Nazis", please read its article: ]. ] 08:44, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
			<blockquote>'''Sources do not establish ] is met'''</blockquote>

			While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
	== Gerald Fredrick Toben ==

			You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
	Hey dude, I notice you've been removing lots of people from the anti-semite category. I reckon Toben fits into this category, and I think that Toben would probably agree. He doesn't really hide the fact that he hates Jews. His website was also found by the Federal Court of Australia to "vilify Jews." What do you reckon? ] 08:51, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

			Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify -->
	== Wendy Campbell ==

			'''<span style="color: red;">This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the ] of each individual page for details.</span>''' Thanks, ] (]) 09:00, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
	Sorry, but its not libel. Read ] under defenses: you'll see that several of them apply here: First of all, truth is an absolute defense: For her to claim libel, she must conclusively show that the claim is false. Second, she is a public figure, under the case law resulting from New York vs. Sullivan, our speech regarding her is protected unless it can be shown that it meets the following conditions (all of them): It is false, we knew it was false, and we had malicious intent or reckless disregard for her reputation. None of that is the case here. Thanks. ] ] ] ] ] 09:34, 24 November 2006 (UTC) (a law student).
			== "]" listed at ] ==
			]
			The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink\|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 11#According to John}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 07:06, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
			== "]" listed at ] ==
			]
			The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink\|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 15#The Secret Team: The CIA and Its Allies in Control of the United States and the World and JFK: The CIA, Vietnam, and the Plot to Assassinate John F. Kennedy}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 00:38, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
			== "]" listed at ] ==
			]
			The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink\|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 2#Hamas militants}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 23:14, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
			== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
			<div class="afd-notice">
			<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].

			The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
	I see it. Remember the standard in wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. The fact is there are two sourced claims of anti-semitism. While I personally think the category should be renamed "alleged anti-semites", it's survived something like 4 CFDs.

			Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 20:49, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
	Furtheremore, while truth is an absolute defense to libel, so is a good faith claim about a public figure the claimant believes to be the truth. The burden of libel in the united states is on the plaintiff, not the defendant. If Wendy Campbell has a problem with it, wikipedia has a libel email hotline she's welcome to mail, however we're not a censored project, and if she wants to claim libel, she must prove the falsehood of that claim. ] ] ] ] ] 09:48, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
			== "]" listed at ] ==
			]
			The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink\|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 28#Job creators}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 21:48, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

			== ] of ] ==
	But she's not a reliable source because it's not verifiable. Remember what constitutes a reliable source: Another wikipedia article is not a reliable source. Jerusalem Post is a fact-checked primary source, as is Sue Blackwell. Thats 2 reliable sources to 0. If Wendy Campbell came out in the new york times tomorrow, then you'd have a point, but that hasn't happened. And I shouldn't have to point out that it is a guideline that the subjects of articles should not interfere on the editing of their own articles as they cannot possibly maintain a neutral point of view. I'm going to revert and add the category back in. I'm asking you not to remove it until you can find a RELIABLE source that says she is not: by reliable I mean a fact checked publication that is not a blog, personal web page, or the subject of the article itself. If not, I'll bring the page to WP:AN where they can debate whether claiming libel constitutes a violation of WP:NLT, but I hate to waste their time when the facts clearly support that I'm right. So please, allow the category to stay unless you can find such data, or better yet, create a new category called "alleged anti-semites". ] ] ] ] ] 09:59, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
			]

			The article ] has been ] because of the following concern:
	Just noticed my last edit came off a little threatening. I didn't mean it like that, just that I don't plan on violating 3RR, and the people at WP:AN, while good natured, take forever to solve any sort of content dispute regarding libel claims. Sorry if you misread it somehow ] ] ] ] ] 10:04, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
			<blockquote>'''Fails ]. No extensive coverage, google news yields only 2 sources.'''</blockquote>

			While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
	No no no, I'm not saying that SHE's not a reliable source, I'm saying that she's not a reliable source on wikipedia due to the "anyone can edit, and anyone can claim to be anyone else), and she's not a reliable source on her own personal pages (due to the personal page aspect not being a RS, and due to the guideline on people not editing their own articles). What I'm saying is she's only be a reliable source if she was commenting in a reliable secondary source: a newspaper, magazine, etc. THAT would be acceptable. But there is nothing to that. And I don't follow your analogy: If the NY times claims I like ice cream, and I hate ice cream, it doesn't matter: unless I get the new york times to retract their statement or publish something saying I like ice cream, or unless I come out publically in the washington post saying "Ice cream sucks, popcorn for life", I belong in the "People who like ice cream category". ] ] ] ] ] 10:17, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

			You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
	The NYT is always a reliable source because they're assumed to be fact checked. Therefore, they would not publish it without it being true, (or opinion, which does not conform to the scale of truth). I agree with you that the category sucks, but we have to work within the framework we're given. The proper solution in my belief, is to include a footnote to Wendy's claim within the article, claiming that Wendy disputes that she is an anti-semite. That way, its included in the category, but anyone interested in the topic will clearly see that it is disputed. ] ] ] ] ] 10:41, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

			Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify -->

			'''<span style="color: red;">This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the ] of each individual page for details.</span>''' Thanks, ] (]) 10:01, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

			==] nomination of ]==
			]
			{{Quote box\|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read ].</p><p>You may want to consider using the ] to help you create articles.</p>\|width=20%\|align=right}}
			A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not ] how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the ], such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about ].

			If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the {{Querylink\|Special:Log\|qs=type=delete&page=Hurt+Hardy\|deleting administrator}}. <!-- Template:Db-notability-notice --> ] (]) 23:13, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
			== ] of ] ==
			]

			The article ] has been ] because of the following concern:
	If you hadn't noticed, there is a 3rd source of antisemitic comments, I just saw on the talk page, which also makes a good argument that the lack of commentary is due to her fringe position: reposted below:
			<blockquote>'''Does not meet the notability requirements of WP:CRIME'''</blockquote>

			While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].

			You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].

			Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 01:02, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
	==Category:Anti-Semitic people==
			== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
	Thanks for fixing my talk page. Had it categorised me as grumpy mild-xenophone, that would have been reasonably accurate. I've been trying to remove stuff from ] too, but I haven't got very far. It seems superfluous to me to have anti-Semitic and Holocaust denier and neo-Nazi. I mean, can anyone point to a philo-Semitic neo-Nazi or Holocaust denier ? If there was an Arrow Cross or Iron Guard category, lots of Hungarians and Romanians could be cleared out too. Anyway, thanks again. ] ] 00:58, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
			<div class="afd-notice">
	==Judaism and Christianity==
			<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].
	See http://whatjewsbelieve.org/explanation09.html . Excellent explanation, written by a Rabbi. --] \| <small>'']''</small> 09:47, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
	:Repeat. --] \| <small>'']''</small> 22:52, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
	::It is quite easy. Accepting a dead heretic as Messiah is abandoning Judaism. All Jewish authorities agree on that. The Messiah must be 1) alive and 2) recognized as being such by the Jewish leadership. Jesus is dead, has been dead for 2006 years. And he was not recognized by the Jewish leadership, neither then nor now, as being the Messiah. The Jewish leadership determined that he violated Torah law, and that's it. Then he is not the Messiah. Accepting Jesus as Messiah constitutes a full and complete renunciation of Judaism. --] \| <small>'']''</small> 08:22, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

			The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
	== Daniel's edit ==

			Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 01:09, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
	Regarding your comment I'm particularly puzzled by his edit since that was the one source which I think everyone agrees is reliable. ] 22:19, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
			== "]" listed at ] ==
			]
			The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink\|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 15#How the sausage gets made}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> ] (<sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub>) 19:15, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 19:15, 15 July 2024

This user may have left Misplaced Pages. Kendrick7 has not edited Misplaced Pages since 16 May 2021. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

This editor is a **Tutnum of the Encyclopedia** and is entitled to display this **Book of Knowledge with Coffee Cup Stain, Cigarette Burn, and Chewed Broken Pencil**.

Archive
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

Proposed deletion of Edward Adam

The article Edward Adam has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only passing mentions, no significant coverage that I could find.

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kj cheetham (talk) 17:38, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Christopher Heinz

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Christopher Heinz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Christopher Heinz. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ... discospinster _talk 17:10, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 27

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Christopher Heinz

added a link pointing to Pittsburg

Henry J. Heinz

added a link pointing to Birmingham, Pennsylvania

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Notice of neutral point of view noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is White supremacy and the Proud Boys.The discussion is about the topic Proud Boys. Thank you. ItsPugle (please ping on reply) 01:44, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Brighteon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brighteon is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Brighteon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 04:42, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of COBRA (Joseph R. Rosenberger novel series)

The article COBRA (Joseph R. Rosenberger novel series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:NBOOK

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Proposed deletion of COBRA (Timothy Zahn novel series)

The article COBRA (Timothy Zahn novel series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:NBOOK as notability is not inherited from author.

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

"Misplaced Pages:FAKENEWS" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Misplaced Pages:FAKENEWS. The discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 23#Misplaced Pages:FAKENEWS until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 18:08, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

"New Catechism" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect New Catechism and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 2#New Catechism until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 01:25, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Rosemont Seneca Partners for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rosemont Seneca Partners is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Rosemont Seneca Partners until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

AlexEng 02:26, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

"Heavies" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Heavies and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 8#Heavies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. TraderCharlotte (talk) 03:32, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Daniel Tzvetkoff

The article Daniel Tzvetkoff has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sources do not establish WP:BIO is met

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

"According to John" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect According to John has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 11 § According to John until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 07:06, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

"The Secret Team: The CIA and Its Allies in Control of the United States and the World and JFK: The CIA, Vietnam, and the Plot to Assassinate John F. Kennedy" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect The Secret Team: The CIA and Its Allies in Control of the United States and the World and JFK: The CIA, Vietnam, and the Plot to Assassinate John F. Kennedy has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 15 § The Secret Team: The CIA and Its Allies in Control of the United States and the World and JFK: The CIA, Vietnam, and the Plot to Assassinate John F. Kennedy until a consensus is reached. Grorp (talk) 00:38, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

"Hamas militants" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Hamas militants has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 2 § Hamas militants until a consensus is reached. GnocchiFan (talk) 23:14, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Six phases of a big project for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Six phases of a big project is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Six phases of a big project until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 20:49, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

"Job creators" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Job creators has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 28 § Job creators until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 21:48, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Loïc Jean-Albert

The article Loïc Jean-Albert has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:BIO. No extensive coverage, google news yields only 2 sources.

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Hurt Hardy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Hurt Hardy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

Proposed deletion of Hurt Hardy

The article Hurt Hardy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet the notability requirements of WP:CRIME

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Nomination of Hurt Hardy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hurt Hardy is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Hurt Hardy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

GuyBanks (talk) 01:09, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

"How the sausage gets made" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect How the sausage gets made has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 15 § How the sausage gets made until a consensus is reached. Ivanvector (/_Edits) 19:15, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

Categories: