| Revision as of 20:20, 1 December 2006 editAlbinomite (talk | contribs)62 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 17:15, 3 December 2006 edit undoJpgordon (talk | contribs)Checkusers, Administrators82,308 editsm Reverted edits by Albinomite (talk) to last version by Sugaar | ||
| (14 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ¡Albino, te pido que no escribas nada comprometedor en mi pagina pues hay un loco aqui que lo traduce todo! | ¡Albino, te pido que no escribas nada comprometedor en mi pagina pues hay un loco aqui que lo traduce todo! | ||
| J'inciterai le jour prochain un vote de direction à la page "noire," ta presence sera absolument nécessaire, au même que l'apparition des autres (L. et M. inclus).--] 20:20, 1 December 2006 (UTC) | J'inciterai le jour prochain un vote de direction à la page "noire," ta presence sera absolument nécessaire, au même que l'apparition des autres (L. et M. inclus). Nous complèterons la colonisation de la page "noire," ça sera vraiment magnifique.--] 20:20, 1 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
| Understood. This is all above aboard, we are giving them no legitimate reason to complain, anyhow they are all insane (''locos como una cabra'').--] 02:35, 2 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Well if you don't actually make any edits to pages, you might get some people complaining. If you make changes against consensus you might get people complaining. If you make racist and sexist comments on talk pages you might get some complaining. In all you have already done enough to make quite a lot of people suspicious of you and your motives. I don't think you have any idea how robust wikipedia is. Any serious breach of correct procedure, or any attempts to interfere with the normal editing of pages will just get reverted. There is probably enough evidence already to get you investigated for ]. Just some friendly advice, there is very little actual long term damage you can do here, we are all equal here. If you try to "take over" an article then you will probably get a block, or even a ban. Comments like are not helpful. This is not only irrelevant to the discussion, it is (possibly deliberately) inflmatory, besides being complete nonsense. ] 05:43, 2 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::If you want to make a comment about a specific quote on the talk page, then it's best to include your comment directly under what you are refering to. You should also indent your comment. It is extremely unclear what you are refering to by your comment and by where you have placed it. Sorry for saying your post was not relevant (though it's still nonsense), I can see what you mean now. Also please do not call other users "mad" or "crazy" or ''locos'', this is a personal attack. I don't care what you think of me, you probaly think of me the same way I think of you. Our politics naturally make us suspicious of each other. We still need to be civil to each other, and it is still a breach of wikipedia rules to call other editors names or imply that they are mentally ill. ] 06:10, 2 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Black People talk page == | |||
| It is fine to archive '''old discussions''', but it is inappropriate to archive ongoing threads, and especially discussions that were started just a couple of days ago. Also, do not remove talk page templates, which included a navigation to archives or earlier discussions. Thanks. --] 07:39, 2 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Who are "Us"? == | |||
| What do you mean by "us" in your comment ? Misplaced Pages is a very transparent and open site, would you mind to explain why you, Balino-Antimod and Albinomite (and possibly others) act as an organization? | |||
| And, by the way, please (again) refrain from ]. --] 08:25, 2 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| And also posting bogus warnings like you did is harassment. Take it in account, you can be blocked and even banned if you continue with this aggressive attitude. --] 08:29, 2 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 17:15, 3 December 2006
¡Albino, te pido que no escribas nada comprometedor en mi pagina pues hay un loco aqui que lo traduce todo!
J'inciterai le jour prochain un vote de direction à la page "noire," ta presence sera absolument nécessaire, au même que l'apparition des autres (L. et M. inclus). Nous complèterons la colonisation de la page "noire," ça sera vraiment magnifique.--Albinomite 20:20, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Understood. This is all above aboard, we are giving them no legitimate reason to complain, anyhow they are all insane (locos como una cabra).--LaBotadeFranco 02:35, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
- Well if you don't actually make any edits to pages, you might get some people complaining. If you make changes against consensus you might get people complaining. If you make racist and sexist comments on talk pages you might get some complaining. In all you have already done enough to make quite a lot of people suspicious of you and your motives. I don't think you have any idea how robust wikipedia is. Any serious breach of correct procedure, or any attempts to interfere with the normal editing of pages will just get reverted. There is probably enough evidence already to get you investigated for meatpuppetry. Just some friendly advice, there is very little actual long term damage you can do here, we are all equal here. If you try to "take over" an article then you will probably get a block, or even a ban. Comments like this are not helpful. This is not only irrelevant to the discussion, it is (possibly deliberately) inflmatory, besides being complete nonsense. Alun 05:43, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
- If you want to make a comment about a specific quote on the talk page, then it's best to include your comment directly under what you are refering to. You should also indent your comment. It is extremely unclear what you are refering to by your comment and by where you have placed it. Sorry for saying your post was not relevant (though it's still nonsense), I can see what you mean now. Also please do not call other users "mad" or "crazy" or locos, this is a personal attack. I don't care what you think of me, you probaly think of me the same way I think of you. Our politics naturally make us suspicious of each other. We still need to be civil to each other, and it is still a breach of wikipedia rules to call other editors names or imply that they are mentally ill. Alun 06:10, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
Black People talk page
It is fine to archive old discussions, but it is inappropriate to archive ongoing threads, and especially discussions that were started just a couple of days ago. Also, do not remove talk page templates, which included a navigation to archives or earlier discussions. Thanks. --Ezeu 07:39, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
Who are "Us"?
What do you mean by "us" in your comment here? Misplaced Pages is a very transparent and open site, would you mind to explain why you, Balino-Antimod and Albinomite (and possibly others) act as an organization?
And, by the way, please (again) refrain from personal attacks. --Sugaar 08:25, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
And also posting bogus warnings like you did here is harassment. Take it in account, you can be blocked and even banned if you continue with this aggressive attitude. --Sugaar 08:29, 2 December 2006 (UTC)