| Revision as of 06:47, 2 December 2006 editZvesda~enwiki (talk | contribs)14 edits Most Scholars Do Not Feel Exclusivity of Ukraine← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 13:57, 8 December 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,303,756 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Holodomor/Archive 20) (bot |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{controversial}} |
|
{{Talk header}} |
|
|
{{Contentious topics/talk notice|topic=e-e|style=long}} |
|
{{Talkheader}} |
|
|
|
{{Controversial}} |
|
{{FAOL|Ukrainian|uk:Голодомор в Україні 1932-1933 років}} |
|
|
|
{{Calm}} |
|
] | ] | ] | ] |
|
|
|
{{Round in circles|search=no}} |
|
|
{{On this day|date1=2007-11-24|oldid1=173515234|date2=2008-11-22|oldid2=253428170|date3=2009-11-28|oldid3=328209906|date4=2010-11-27|oldid4=399047133|date5=2014-11-22|oldid5=634961783|date6=2015-11-28|oldid6=692522926|date7=2016-11-26|oldid7=751417093|date8=2017-11-25|oldid8=811990408|date9=2018-11-24|oldid9=870343114|date10=2019-11-23|oldid10=927581845}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|1= |
|
|
{{WikiProject Ukraine|importance=Top}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Soviet Union |importance=High |rus=yes |rus-importance=high |hist=yes}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Death|importance=High}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Human rights|importance=Top}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Philosophy|importance=High|ethics=yes}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography|importance=High}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Ethnic groups|importance=High}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Discrimination|importance=High}} |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{Annual readership}} |
|
|
{{Section sizes}} |
|
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|
| algo=old(90d) |
|
|
| archive=Talk:Holodomor/Archive %(counter)d |
|
|
| counter=20 |
|
|
| maxarchivesize=150K |
|
|
| archiveheader={{tan}} |
|
|
| minthreadsleft=1 |
|
|
| minthreadstoarchive=1 |
|
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
== Cats == |
|
== Holodomor == |
|
|
{{Moved discussion from|User talk:Manyareasexpert#Holodomor| ] (]) 20:14, 8 September 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
|
Hi. I see you reverted my changes. The secondary source bringing the events into connection actually exists and it was mentioned as one of the reference but wasn't made the main thing (Timothy Snyder, "Covert Polish Missions Across the Soviet Ukrainian Border, 1928-1933", 2005). Would it be okay if I rework with making it more prominent and add the primary sources as additional justification, or should I not mention them at all? <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 20:08, 8 September 2024 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
:Greetings! I scrolled through Snyder and he has a chapter on the famine so adding him would be fine. I'm generally against adding something based on primary sources as the article is already pretty large by itself and we have lots of secondary sources covering the subject. So why use primary ones. ] (]) 20:19, 8 September 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::Declaring Holodomor a "natural event" that happened due to bad weather conditions rather than an intentional "clean up" of Ukrainian society is a popular propaganda point of those, who deny Holodomor as a genocide based on the assumed lack of intention. Thus, I considered it important to also include the primary sources (such as the "Report to the Seventeenth Party Congress", which states that Ukrainian nationalism became the "chief danger" since it "linked up with the interventionists") that support the claim about the relationships between Prometheus/"Polish agents" activities and Holodomor established by Snyder and several other Ukrainian researches. But I will follow your suggestion and will only stick to the secondary sources. ] (]) 08:56, 14 September 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::There is already some info on attack on nationalism in the article, which could be extended. ] (]) 09:17, 14 September 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::But its not up for debate, we have the sources all modern scholarship views it as fully intentional. ] (]) 05:09, 4 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Semi-protected edit request on 23 November 2024 == |
|
No genocide, no democide. Nothing. What happend? Another "plot of the Russians editors" or just inadvertence of administrators?--] 15:11, 7 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{Edit semi-protected|Holodomor|answered=yes}} |
|
:Instead of suspecting an existence of a "plot" and being deluded that a makes or breaks ] as such, consider getting a wikipedia account, then pick a section in the Holodomor article and contribute towards an ] version. If you think that the Holodomor was genocide then make sure the arguments for it being so are reflected in the main article and cited with scholarly citations. As you can probably see from the reference section, currently this article heavily cites a work by the Davies et. al., in effect Davies et. al. pov is heavily reflected. --] <sup>]</sup> 19:20, 7 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
The term Holodomor (death by hunger, in Ukrainian) refers to the starvation of millions of Ukrainians in 1932–33 as a result of Soviet policies. The Holodomor can be seen as the culmination of an assault by the Communist Party and Soviet state on the Ukrainian peasantry, who resisted Soviet policies. This assault occurred in the context of a campaign of intimidation and arrests of Ukrainian intellectuals, writers, artists, religious leaders, and political cadres, who were seen as a threat to Soviet ideological and state-building aspirations. ] (]) 19:39, 23 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:{{Not done}}: please provide ] that support the change you want to be made.<!-- Template:ESp --> ⸺(])] 20:18, 23 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
no democide?--] 18:40, 8 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:Alex Kov, having to deal with you is very annoying. You continue to refuse to sign in. You do not engage in talk page discussions, you insist on unreferenced or poorly referenced changes. Such attitutde is widely considered trollish. --] 18:46, 8 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
::I have returned democide. I think it is appropriate ] 00:18, 9 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
I am replacing the massive ]'s paste of the off-site material to this talk page with a link: |
|
|
*Andrea Graziosi, , Conference on ''Soviet Totalitarianism in Ukraine: History and Legacy"'', September 2 - 6, 2005, Kiev, Ukraine. |
|
|
First of all this pasting violated the copyright as the message at the bottom stated "All rights reserved. Coyping only with the written permission from the publisher." But even if it were not copyrighted, pasting of massive texts to the talk pages is extremely unhelpful as it makes discussion impossible by obscuring what editors are trying to say. Please do not do it. --] 22:17, 9 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Spin-off: ]== |
|
|
POV fork or a very bad title for a subarticle.--<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</span></sub> 16:54, 26 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
: Was just created today by some user... What would you advise, Piotrus? -- ] <sup>]</sup> 16:57, 26 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
I prodded the fork and restored the text back. This is an extremely important aspect and needs discussed in the main article. --] 19:59, 26 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Lemkin line == |
|
|
|
|
|
Again, you can coin a marketing slogan, but not "genocide"- putting it as simply as humanly possible. ] 22:48, 26 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:We are not familiar with Lemkin's statements on whether H was Genocide. We know two things. Lemkin was first to define what a G is, the term belongs to him. He spoke at the meeting. The article says exactly this. --] 22:51, 26 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::You are absolutely right Irpen, thanks for fixing. I retract my objections. ] 22:57, 26 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Question regarding refs == |
|
|
|
|
|
Currently, there are two methods for references that are used in this article plus a separate section for notes, and this has no logical organization. Am I wrong? I'd like to get all the sources cited in one way to ease verification and standardize. --] <sup>]</sup> 15:53, 28 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:Actually, it's worse than that. The way the refs set up there are references with numbers like and linked to nowhere. The last sentence of ''Politicization of the famine'' section is redundant anyhow. ] 12:50, 29 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Debate is over == |
|
|
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/6193266.stm UKRAINE RULES IT IS GENOCIDE, DEBATE IS OVER! {{unsigned|Andrewuoft}} |
|
|
: Wow, what an art of persuasion, I'm impressed. You study Cicero, don't you? Or Demosthenes, maybe... Slightly more seriously, Turks still do not recognize Armenian genocide. So for you, it means it does not exists... Hmm... So next time, please refrain from such posts. |
|
|
: Oh, and new posts go to the bottom of the page, not top. -- ] <sup>]</sup> 18:52, 30 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
A partisan opinion like this is not anything valuable. It is a violation of NPOV policy to mention this in the article. The fact is that the international community does not take into serious consideration these fabricated fairy tales. As has been exhaustively debated on this discussion board, the opinion that this famine was man-made and exclusive to Ukraine has been thoroughly discredited. The Polonized Ukrainians don't even have their facts straight. They claim that "up to 10 million" died even though the archives show 1.5 million deaths. ] |
|
|
|
|
|
:Jacob Peters, you repeat the troll's mistakes by refusing to acknowledge what has been explained to you multiple times. 1.5 millions is as bogus as 10 millions. The real number is in between. It has been shown at the talk and in the article why the 1.5 mln number is impossible. Please be serious if you want your input to be respected. Don't approach the article with the political agenda to push like some here. --] 23:22, 30 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
You are lying with the claim that it has been explained multiple times that the 1.5 million can be contested. The declassified Soviet archives vindicate the figure whereas the "7 to 10 million" figure is absolutely unsubstantiated. |
|
|
|
|
|
] |
|
|
|
|
|
:Accusation in lying is a personal attack. 7-10 million is unsubtsantiated indeed. 1.5 million is unrealistic either as Soviet archives are self-contradictory. '''Recorded excess deaths''' are indeed 1.5 million. However recorded death statistics does not add up to the census data. Demographs concider these two censuses to be accurate. As such, the data derived from the census is more reliable and gives 4.5 million. This has been explained at this very page to you and others (now in archives) as well as in the article. Sources are provided. --] 02:04, 1 December 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
If only you'd be familiar with the material you are addressing. The 1.5 million figure is in fact based on '''revised''' registration data. The earlier versions showed about 600 thousand fewer deaths in Ukraine. |
|
|
|
|
|
] |
|
|
|
|
|
== Extraordinarily POV Intro == |
|
|
|
|
|
''Most modern scholars agree that the famine was caused by the policies of the government of the ] under ], rather than by natural reasons'' |
|
|
|
|
|
:Bullshit above is manifest. Whereas we are told that "most modern scholars" agree the famine was caused by the government, yet half of the sources listed were published before the Soviet archives were declassified. The source by Davies and Wheatcroft is blatantly misrepresented as they do not agree that the famine was caused by the government. They as well as Mark Tauger extensively document natural factors that crashed the harvest. ] |
|
|
|
|
|
::False. Scholars agree or disagree on the idea Soviet gov's plotted to inflict hunger on Ukrainians, but there is no dispute that the grain was collected ny the gov to filfill quotas, the result was the Famine, the aid effort was delayed and botched. As such, the famine was preventable but was not prevented due to the Soviet policies. It is the gov policies that caused it and not weather. Tauger and Davies confirm that as they go lengths on discussing the aid effort and collection. --] 02:24, 1 December 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Title Change == |
|
|
|
|
|
This nonesense has to end. The major scholarly sources devoted specifically to this famine such as "Years of Hunger" by Davies and Wheatcroft and writings by Mark Tauger refer to this period simply as the Soviet famine rather than some propagandistic nationalist term like "Golodomor". The fact that famine was not limited to Ukraine and that the Soviet government tried to assist regions struck by famine totally discredits an intent or an insinuation of national exclusivity. |
|
|
|
|
|
Major recent writings published on this famine include: |
|
|
|
|
|
''Natural Disaster and Human Actions in the '''Soviet Famine of 1931-1933''''', Tauger |
|
|
|
|
|
''Stalin, Grain Stocks and the '''Famine of 1932-1933'''"'', Davies, Wheatcroft, and Tauger in ''Slavic Review'' |
|
|
|
|
|
Notice the total absence of the term "Golodomor" |
|
|
|
|
|
] |
|
|
|
|
|
Bravo Jacob Peters, my stalinist genius! In your brilliant opinion, historians like James Mace, Hubert Laszkiewicz, Andrea Graziosi, Yuriy Shapoval, Gerhard Simon, Orest Subtelny, Mauro Martini, Nicolas Werth, Stephane Courtois, Roman Serbyn, Ferdinando Adornato, Federigo Argentieri, Ettore Cinnella, Massimo De Angelis, Gabriele De Rosa, Renzo Foa, Oxana Pachlovska, Vittorio Strada, Victor Zaslavski, Alain Besançon, Francesco Perfetti, Lucio Vilari, Rudolf Mark, Egbert Jahn, Wilfried Jilge, Dmytro Zlepko, Wolodomyr Kosyk, Daniel Beauvois, Jean-Lois Panné, Etienne Thevenin, they are ignorant! |
|
|
|
|
|
BRAVO BRAVO BRAVO BRAVO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
] 00:06, 1 December 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
James Mace headed a propaganda campaign for the US government. Falsely remarked that famine occurred from "crop seizure". Not an unbiased source. None of those authors you've named have been involved in any notable discourse about the famine in scholarly journals. |
|
|
|
|
|
] |
|
|
|
|
|
:I would like to strongly condemn the unproposed article moves that were made. Soviet famine would be a legit article as well and, besides, a broader article already exists. ]. The article on the specifically Ukrainian famine has every right to exist. So, the move to ] is out of question. The move to the ] may be discussed but first propsoed and dicussed and then decided, not the other way around. --] 02:16, 1 December 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Was the Holodomor genocide?== |
|
|
|
|
|
''Today, the heads of state, governments or parliaments of 26 countries'' |
|
|
|
|
|
:26 countries meaning that this is the minority of the international community. It is particularly absent of credibility considering that most of these countries conduct a deliberately anti-Russian policy. 26 countries of 192 in the United Nations is insufficient to put through a resolution calling this "genocide". ] |
|
|
|
|
|
::First, the fact that other countries recognize the Famine as Genocide is notable and definetely belongs to the article. ], Minister for Foreign Affairs of UA, in a recent interview I read mentioned 10 countries though. This needs to be figured out but there is no debate that such information is notable for a Misplaced Pages without Jacob's editoriolizing that "those countries are members of NATO", etc. --] 02:12, 1 December 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::::Jacob Peters: Please provide the list of countries, which studied the issue of Holodomor, and following the study decided that it should not be recognized as genocide. |
|
|
|
|
|
''Robert Conquest, the author of one of the most important Western studies published prior to the declassifying of the the Soviet archives, concluded that the famine of 1932–33 was artificial—that is a deliberate ], if not genocide committed as part of ]'s ].'' |
|
|
|
|
|
:Yet more ass-kissing of Conquest. Since he did not have access to the archives, it was impossible for him to conclude anything. He therefore did not conclude that the famine was artificial or deliberate. His work has been shreaded by Wheatcroft and Davies. Conquest falsely remarked that the 1932 harvest was no worse than the previous year's. ] |
|
|
::First, Conquest's work is not useless although, incomplete, as archives were not accessible to him. He indeed admitted lately in his correspondance to Davies that he agrees with the latter that Genocide strictly speaking does not apply. However, Conquest provides lots of factual data and is useful. He is particularly notable in covering the history of the Famine coverage as his book was the most comprehensive work for its time. --] 02:12, 1 December 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
''These documents show that Moscow singled out Ukraine, while regions outside it were allowed to receive humanitarian aid.'' |
|
|
|
|
|
:This is absolutely false as declassified Politburo and Sovnarkom decrees show that the state delivered famine relief to the Ukraine ] |
|
|
::It seems like you only write and never read responses. Yes, aid was given but there was a special directive to give aid only to those who are sent to the fields. Ref was given. --] 02:12, 1 December 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
''According to the US Government Commission on the Ukrainian Famine () the seizure of the 1932 crop by the Soviet authorities was the main reason of the famine.'' |
|
|
|
|
|
:These findings have been discredited. Plus, a propaganda campaign sponsored by the US government is not exactly a reliable, NPOV, scholarly source. Grain collections by the government in 1932 were only 80% of the total of previous years. ] |
|
|
::At the same time, the Soviets deliberately withheld the state reserve grain until the last moment and made it available for aid only when the devastating famine was raging. This is actually said by Tauger himself. --] 02:12, 1 December 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
===A few questions=== |
|
|
The important questions on ] that needs to be addressed are: |
|
|
*(1) Why were the borders of Ukrainian SSR sealed off by the Soviet authorities? |
|
|
*(2) If it was a harvest failure, why was the burden of that failure not simply shared across the Soviet Union? |
|
|
*(3) Why were all kinds of meal confiscated? What was the punishment for? |
|
|
The questions are borrowed from {{unsigned|KPbIC}} |
|
|
|
|
|
::Let me answer them: |
|
|
::#It was not only Ukrainian borders, there were checkpoints throughout the USSR |
|
|
::#Well the actual harvest failure in other parts of the Soviet Union was even worse, take the ] where <small>В огромной Курганской области (соизмеримой с тогдашней УССР) и в Центрально-Черноземной области (также житнице) в том же 33-м точно так же дошло до повсеместного каннибализма. На Урале за невыполнения плана хлебозаготовок изымалось тех же 100% запасов. А на Поволжье дело доходило до публичных порок. В этих областях голод был гораздо ощутимей, чем на Черниговщине. В Центрально-Черноземной области в 33-м погибло по разным оценкам от 200 до 850 тыс.человек. В Челябинской, Пермской, Свердловской обл. – свыше 87 тысяч. Поволжье и Сибирь – порядка 10% населения. |
|
|
::#Please reference the latter.--] 18:09, 1 December 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
*(1) In response to the question "Why were the borders of Ukrainian SSR sealed off by the Soviet authorities?", you mentioned that not only the borders of Ukraine were sealed but the military checkpoints (загранотряды) were set throughout the USSR. It still does not answer why in particular the Ukrainian regions affected by famine were sealed. True that the genocide was not only limited to Ukrainians, but in particular, it was <u>genocide of Ukrainians</u>. |
|
|
|
|
|
*(2) In response to "Why was the burden of that failure not simply shared across the Soviet Union" you provided some evidences that the other regions in the other time periods also unproportionally suffered. Still, going back to Ukraine in 1932/33 the facts are that at the end of the day, the Ukrainian population shrunk substantially (-15% between 1926 and 1937), while the other nationalities of USSR, such as Russians, Tatars, Uzbeks, Armenians substantially grew (all more than +20% over the same time). At the end of the day, peasants were dying, and proletariat was ruling. It was not just that one part of population benefited and the other part did not. It was up to the level when the other part was losing, and was losing up to the <u>death</u>. That was <u>genocide</u>. |
|
|
|
|
|
*(3) You asked for evidence of confiscation of all kinds of food. Let me cite James E. Mace, PhD, Prof. of Political Science, , who refers to the documents published in "Holod 1932-1933 rokiv na Ukrayini: ochyma istorykiv, movoiu dokumentiv" (Kyiv, 1990) |
|
|
|
|
|
:*<i>Consider the decree of November 18, 1932 (pp. 250-260). It calls for an immediate audit of all bread resources in the collective and individual farms to be followed by the seizure of all such resources except for a seed reserve (ordered seized on December 24 - p. 296), the seizure of all advances extended members of delinquent kolhosps, and - most interestingly to me - instituted <u>a series of fines in kind for those "maliciously" undermining the grain seizures including a 150% supplement to one's annual meat quota (take the cow, pig, and/or chickens!) and authorizing the seizure of other foodstuffs</u>. Subsequent reports on fulfillment of this monument of socialist legality make clear included such commercially priceless crops as potatoes and beans. Isn't it amazing that they would take from households without any bread whatever else edible they could find but not intend that somebody might miss a meal?</i> |
|
|
|
|
|
:*<i>On December 6, 1932, the Soviet Ukrainian press published a decree to put on the chorna doshka (black board to denounce those who had underfulfilled) six villages found to be maliciously undermining the grain procurements (seizures actually, since the regime didn't pay), to be extended within a week to 82 districts or about 20% of the republic. The local apparats of such dens of iniquity were to be <u>thoroughly purged</u> (i.e., arrested), <u>the local stores closed with all goods removed from them, and the area itself blockaded</u> so that people could not go to seek victuals elsewhere. But, of course, nobody, of course, actually INTENDED that they might occasionally miss a meal. </i> |
|
|
|
|
|
:*<i>One most interesting document could be published only in part in the abovementioned collection of Party documents. This is a December 14, 1932 decision of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party (bolshevik) and Sovnarkom of the USSR of December 14, 1932 on the grain procurements in Ukraine, the North Caucasus, and the Western oblast, signed by I. Stalin and V. Molotov. This document is instructive in how UNINTENTIONALLY the then supreme self-consecrated leaders of the world proletariat, Stalin and Molotov, saw to the situation. <br>"5. The CC and SNK tells party and Soviet organizations of the Soviet Union that the malicious enemies of the party, working class, and collectivized peasantry are <u>saboteurs of the grain procurements</u> with party cards in their pockets... In relation to those turncoats and enemies of Soviet power and the collective farms the CC and SNK commits itself to <u>severe repression, to sentencing them to 5-10 years in a concentration camp, and under known conditions execution</u>." {{unsigned|KPbIC}} |
|
|
|
|
|
Well I shall not challenge the validity of the sources, they are right, but in particular none that you claim ''True that the genocide was not only limited to Ukrainians, but in particular, it was <u>genocide of Ukrainians</u>''. That IMO is an OR interpretation, because for absolutely all claims, none are specific that it was a deliberate attempt to '''ethnically''' cleanse Ukraine. Yes it was a genocide, even I share that viewpoint, but it was a <u>social</s> genocide NOT national. And here my refrences and your agree, because in any case all fingers point to peasants as targets, not their ethnicity, so its fair to assume that ] can qualify for the genocide cat, but <s>H</s>Golodomor alone cannot, not in the way its presented in the article here. To be truly honest with you, I think the Ukrainian state is playing with fire on the bones of those died, with ridiculous bills being passed such as fines for public denial and so on. Instead, it should concentrate on approaching Russia and Kazakhstan to form an independent multi-national commission with full access to FSB archives that would neutrally analyze the records, and only after the enquiry concludes on weather the events of 1932-1933 were genocide based on whatever scale, then debates will end. However something tells me that the truth on what the commission produces will be quite different on what some Ukrainian politicians want people to believe, for them its very convinient to use the historical fact of a Ukrainian National Genocide in their programmes. Talking about population drops then I give you our favourite demoscope for the 1939 census look at the age statistics for say and . Both show the amount of people born at the age six and seven at about half of what they were prior and after, so I am not sure where the two precent population statistics came from... Again same conclusions, '''whilst there is evidence that only SUGGEST a social genocide, there are none that PROVE that it was a NATIONAL genocide'''. --] 02:10, 2 December 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:Guys, both of you, it is nice that we now returned to the discussion about sources with no trolling. Here is some more points for you and comments. First, all the relevant archives by now ''are'' opened and all serious latest research is based on such archives. Among the Ukrainian scholars, the most serious work was done by Stanislav Kulchytsky. Among the Western ones, the most important study is that by Davies and Wheatcroft. When either of the authors cite the archives, they both come up with the exact same numbers, although they do not always interprete them the same way. |
|
|
|
|
|
:In the by Kulchytsky in Zerkalo, the author mentions that the Famine should be viewed as a Genocide but not against the ethnic Ukrainians but of the population of "Ukraine as a state", citizens of Ukraine. This view differs from each of the ones you presented but is an interesting one. At the same article, Kulchytsky accepts that this is different from the narrow definition of Genocide given by the UN convention. The author makes good points that seeing it with such a narrow context is too restrictive and the Genocide in the meaning "of the People of Ukraine" indeed took place. The same author in earlier works also called for non-politicized and scientific approach as only with statements backed with serious scholarly research we may address the international community with calls for the recognision of the events as a Genocide. At the same time, I did not read the entire book by Davies, but I read some of it. It is certainly a thorough scholarly study as well; and in no way it is a Stalinist apologist bull although some editor here uses the book as to push ''his own'' appologist stuff into the article. Davies disagrees with applicability of Genocide while he does document the deaths of the millions. |
|
|
|
|
|
:The term "national Genocide" in English is misleading as "nationality" means both "citizenship" and "ethnicity". We may discuss the applicability of each of this concepts and say which researcher supports each. Finally, IMO what KK calls "Social Genocide" and the definition suggested by Kulchytsky is not mutually exclusive. --] 02:51, 2 December 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
::I can only agree with you here, by national I meant Национальный, and I must say that if we talk about genocide in 1932-1933 then it has to include '''all''' areas affected, in particular the Kurgan Oblast, where, as my ref says, cannibalism was observed. Now that is genocide in all respects and purposes, but for that case is there a point to treat the events in Ukraine as different? --] 03:07, 2 December 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:::Here is where it gets tricky. The only definition of Genocide that no one really questions is the UN one. It does not mean that this is the only possible definition, but we start talking semantics here as if the term's definition is not universally agreed, its application may not be universally agreed either. I do believe the article should state all mainstream points of view and even mention the Stalinist POV which, despite being a fringe one, is notable for historic puproses. The article does that already. However, Category:Genocide is a different issue. As per ] Misplaced Pages guidline (see #8) "Categories appear without annotations, so be careful of NPOV when creating or filling categories. Unless it is self-evident and uncontroversial that something belongs in a category, it should not be put into a category." I will be returning to the major work on this article. --] 03:30, 2 December 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Protect? == |
|
|
Maybe this page should be locked. It looks like a few editors are determined to keep moving and blanking the page. ] 00:16, 1 December 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:I will look into this after dinner, and will protect if it seems needed. While I am cooking and eating, you can speed up my job by providing diff's for the last few days of vandalism. ]<small> <sup>(Need help? ])</sup></small> 02:32, 1 December 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:Here are a few of them ] 02:49, 1 December 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
Normalcy can be gradually restored in a much better was with less collatoral damage. ] and ] both deserve a block. The first one for edit warring, utter denial to listen to others and the blatant undiscudded move of an article. LuisMatosRibeiro for sterile revert warring (inluding from 82.155 IPs), personal attacks and refusal to discuss as well. Luis also violated 3RR by shifting his revertion spree between the account and the 82... IPs. Since both users do use IPs for editing, and both user's IPs are changing from time to time (see eg. 82... IPs in recent months history), additionally the article needs ''semiprotection''. I don't think complete protection is necessary. I will try to start cleaning up the mess. Won't do everything today, but the most blatant stuff. --] 02:56, 1 December 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:This is alot more indepth than I thought,you should go to ]. I have not done much in the area of protection yet. ]<small> <sup>(Need help? ])</sup></small> 03:37, 1 December 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Most Scholars Do Not Feel Exclusivity of Ukraine == |
|
|
|
|
|
Mark Tauger wrote the following in a review about the slanderous "Black Book of Communism: |
|
|
|
|
|
'''''''Most serious scholars now do not accept the view that this was exclusively a Ukrainian famine''''''' |
|
|
|
|
|
Case closed. The fact most scholars do not consider this to have occurred exclusively in Ukraine means that the version of this article has to be reverted to the improved "Soviet Famine" title. |
|
|
|
|
|
http://www.as.wvu.edu/history/Faculty/Tauger/Tauger,%20Chapter%20for%20Roter%20Holocaust%20book%20b.pdf |
|
Hi. I see you reverted my changes. The secondary source bringing the events into connection actually exists and it was mentioned as one of the reference but wasn't made the main thing (Timothy Snyder, "Covert Polish Missions Across the Soviet Ukrainian Border, 1928-1933", 2005). Would it be okay if I rework with making it more prominent and add the primary sources as additional justification, or should I not mention them at all? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Krispe13 (talk • contribs) 20:08, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
The term Holodomor (death by hunger, in Ukrainian) refers to the starvation of millions of Ukrainians in 1932–33 as a result of Soviet policies. The Holodomor can be seen as the culmination of an assault by the Communist Party and Soviet state on the Ukrainian peasantry, who resisted Soviet policies. This assault occurred in the context of a campaign of intimidation and arrests of Ukrainian intellectuals, writers, artists, religious leaders, and political cadres, who were seen as a threat to Soviet ideological and state-building aspirations. 2A02:A31D:A19C:F000:2D37:491E:AD61:4711 (talk) 19:39, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
.svg){kind=small}
,_Emblem_of_Russia_(1991%E2%80%931992).svg)
Moved from User talk:Manyareasexpert § Holodomor – ManyAreasExpert (talk) 20:14, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ⸺(Random)staplers 20:18, 23 November 2024 (UTC)