Revision as of 15:48, 3 December 2006 view sourceLord of the Isles (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,358 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 22:16, 21 December 2024 view source Helper201 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users85,406 edits I assume this is what was meant. | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Political party in the United Kingdom}} | |||
{{Infobox_British_Political_Party | | |||
{{pp|reason=Returning indefinite semi-protect after end of EC|small=yes}} | |||
party_name = Labour Party | | |||
{{use British English|date=January 2020}} | |||
party_articletitle = Labour Party (UK) | | |||
{{Use dmy dates|date=November 2023}} | |||
party_logo = ] | | |||
{{Infobox political party | |||
leader = ] | | |||
| name = Labour Party | |||
chairman = ] | | |||
| logo = Labour Party (UK) logo.svg | |||
foundation = ], ] | | |||
| logo_size = 250px | |||
ideology = ], ] | | |||
| colorcode = {{party color|Labour Party (UK)}} | |||
position = ] | | |||
| leader1_title = ] | |||
international = ] | | |||
| leader1_name = ] | |||
european = ] | | |||
| leader2_title = ] | |||
europarl = ] | | |||
| leader2_name = ] | |||
colours = ]| | |||
| leader3_title = ] | |||
headquarters = 39 Victoria Street<br>], SW1H 0HA | | |||
| leader3_name = ] | |||
website = | |||
| leader4_title = ] | |||
| leader4_name = Hollie Ridley | |||
| leader5_title = ] | |||
| leader5_name = ] | |||
| founded = {{start date and age|1900|02|27|df=yes|br=yes}}{{sfn|Brivati|Heffernan|2000|ps=: "On 27 February 1900, the Labour Representation Committee was formed to campaign for the election of working class representatives to parliament."}}{{sfn|Thorpe|2008|p=8}}<br>(as the ]) | |||
| headquarters = ]<br>{{plainlist| | |||
*20 Rushworth Street,<br>]<br>SE1 0SS<ref>{{cite web |url=https://labour.org.uk/ |title=Labour |work=The Labour Party |access-date=7 December 2024}}</ref> | |||
*Labour Central,<br>Kings Manor,<br> ]<br>NE1 6PA<ref>{{cite web |url=https://labour.org.uk/contact/ |title=Contact |publisher=Labour Party |access-date=14 September 2020 |archive-date=24 September 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200924174125/https://labour.org.uk/contact/ |url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
}} | }} | ||
| student_wing = ] | |||
The '''Labour Party''' has been, since its founding in the early 20th century, the principal ] of the ] in the ]. It is currently the party of ] in the United Kingdom and in national and regional assemblies in ] (in coalition with the ]), ], and in the ] holds the ] although with the ] having no majority grouping. It won a ] in the ] under the leadership of ]—its first general election victory since ] and the first general election since 1970 in which it had exceeded 40% of the popular vote. The Labour Party won another large majority in the ] in the ] and a smaller one (reduced from 403 to 356 seats) in ]. | |||
| youth_wing = ] | |||
| womens_wing = ] | |||
| wing2_title = LGBT wing | |||
| wing2 = ] | |||
| membership_year = March 2024 | |||
| membership = {{decrease}} 366,604<ref name="Membership, March 2024">{{cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2024/mar/30/labour-membership-falls-by-23000-over-gaza-and-green-policies |title=Labour membership falls by 23,000 over Gaza and green policies |first=Toby |last=Helm |work=The Guardian |date=30 March 2024 |access-date=30 March 2024}}</ref> | |||
| ideology = {{ubl|<!-- Please discuss on talk page before changing. --> | |||
|] | |||
}} | |||
| position = ]{{refn|<ref name="auto1">{{cite web |url=https://edition.cnn.com/2024/07/04/europe/uk-election-europe-populist-surge-intl/index.html |title=As Europe turns right, why has a center-left party won by a landslide in the UK? |publisher=] |first=Luke |last=McGee |date=5 July 2024 |access-date=8 July 2024 |archive-date=5 July 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240705023128/https://edition.cnn.com/2024/07/04/europe/uk-election-europe-populist-surge-intl/index.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="auto2">{{cite web |title=Europe's Center-Left Can Learn a Lot From Scholz, Sanchez and Starmer |date=20 September 2023 |url=https://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/spain-sanchez-scholz-germany/ |publisher=] |access-date=8 July 2024 |archive-date=8 July 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240708184116/https://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/spain-sanchez-scholz-germany/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="auto4"/><ref name="auto3"/>{{sfn|Budge|2008|pp=26–27|}}}} | |||
| european = ] | |||
| international = ]<br />] (observer) | |||
| affiliation1_title = Affiliate party | |||
| affiliation1 = ]<br />(]) <br />{{collapsible list|title = Former affiliates:|]<br>(1906–1932)||]<br>(1916–1920)|]<br>(1918–1939/1942)}} | |||
| affiliation2_title = Other affiliations | |||
| affiliation2 = ] (Northern Ireland) | |||
| colours = {{colour box|{{party colour|Labour Party (UK)}}|border=darkgray}} ] | |||
| governing_body = ] | |||
| slogan = ''Change Begins'' (2024)<ref>{{cite news|title='Change begins now', says Sir Keir Starmer in first speech after winning general election|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2024/07/05/keir-starmer-first-speech-labour-biggest-party-holborn/|author=The Telegraph|publisher=The Telegraph|access-date=18 October 2024}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|first=Andrew|last=Sparrow|url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/live/2024/sep/17/keir-starmer-gifts-labour-conservatives-lib-dems-uk-politics-news-latest-updates?CMP=share_btn_url&page=with%3Ablock-66e9a11e8f086ad2b4929b15#block-66e9a11e8f086ad2b4929b15|title=Labour unveils 'Change Begins' as conference slogan|publisher=The Guardian|date=17 September 2024|access-date=18 October 2024}}</ref> | |||
| anthem = "]"{{parabr}}] | |||
| symbol = ] | |||
| blank2_title = ] | |||
| blank2 = {{plainlist| | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
}} | |||
| blank3_title = ] | |||
| blank3 = ] (PLP) | |||
| seats1_title = ] | |||
| seats1 = {{composition bar|402|650|hex={{party color|Labour Party (UK)}}}} | |||
| seats2_title = ] | |||
| seats2 = {{composition bar|{{HOL|LAB}}|{{HOL|TOTAL}}|hex={{party color|Labour Party (UK)}}}} | |||
| seats3_title = ] | |||
| seats3 = {{composition bar|22|129|hex={{party color|Labour Party (UK)}}}} | |||
| seats4_title = ] | |||
| seats4 = {{composition bar|30|60|hex={{party color|Labour Party (UK)}}}} | |||
| seats5_title = ]{{ref label|a|nb}} | |||
| seats5 = {{composition bar|11|12|hex={{party color|Labour Party (UK)}}}} | |||
| seats6_title = ] | |||
| seats6 = {{composition bar|11|25|hex={{party color|Labour Party (UK)}}}} | |||
| seats7_title = ] | |||
| seats7 = {{composition bar|17|37|hex={{party color|Labour Party (UK)}}}} | |||
| seats8_title = ] | |||
| seats8 = {{composition bar|10|16|hex={{party color|Labour Party (UK)}}}} | |||
| seats9_title = ]{{ref label|b|nb}}<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://opencouncildata.co.uk/ |title=Open Council Data UK – compositions councillors parties wards elections |website=opencouncildata.co.uk |access-date=19 December 2022 |archive-date=30 April 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210430183531/http://opencouncildata.co.uk/ |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
| seats9 = {{composition bar|6474|18740|hex={{party color|Labour Party (UK)}}}} | |||
| footnotes = <small>{{note|a||] and 11 ] mayors.}}<br />{{note|b||Councillors of local authorities in England (including 25 aldermen of the ]) and Scotland, principal councils in Wales and local councils in Northern Ireland.}}</small> | |||
| flag = | |||
| website = {{Official URL}} | |||
| country = the United Kingdom | |||
| seats10 = {{composition bar|155|371|hex={{party colour|Labour Party (UK) | |||
}}}} | |||
| seats10_title = ] | |||
}} | |||
{{Social democracy sidebar}} | |||
{{labour|sp=uk|expanded=parties}} | |||
The '''Labour Party''' is a ] that sits on the ] of the political spectrum.<ref>{{Cite news |last1=Abou-Chadi |first1=Tarik |last2=Gingrich |first2=Jane |date=2021-05-09 |title=It's not just in Britain – across Europe, social democracy is losing its way |url=https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/may/09/not-just-britain-across-europe-social-democracy-losing-way |access-date=2024-07-17 |work=The Observer |language=en-GB |issn=0029-7712 |archive-date=13 September 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240913233645/https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/may/09/not-just-britain-across-europe-social-democracy-losing-way |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |date=11 October 2023 |title=Britain's Labour Party embraces supply-side social democracy |url=https://www.economist.com/britain/2023/10/11/britains-labour-party-embraces-supply-side-social-democracy |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240718054136/https://www.economist.com/britain/2023/10/11/britains-labour-party-embraces-supply-side-social-democracy |archive-date=18 July 2024 |access-date=2024-07-17 |newspaper=The Economist |issn=0013-0613}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Clarkson |first=Alexander |date=2023-09-20 |title=Europe's Center-Left Can Learn a Lot From Scholz, Sanchez and Starmer |url=https://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/spain-sanchez-scholz-germany/ |access-date=2024-07-17 |website=World Politics Review |language=en-US |archive-date=8 July 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240708184116/https://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/spain-sanchez-scholz-germany/ |url-status=live }}</ref> The party has been described as an alliance of ], ] and ]ists.<ref name="Worley2009">{{cite book|author=Matthew Worley|title=The Foundations of the British Labour Party: Identities, Cultures and Perspectives, 1900–39|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Fki0YScKbA8C&pg=PA1|year=2009|publisher=Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.|isbn=978-0-7546-6731-5|pages=1–2}}</ref> It is one of ] in the United Kingdom, along with the ]. The party has been led by ] since 2020, who became ] in July 2024. Since the ], the Labour Party has been the ] and the largest political party in the ], followed by the Conservative Party and the ]. As of 2024, there have been seven Labour ] and fourteen Labour ]. The party traditionally holds the annual ] during ], at which debates and voting take place, and senior Labour figures promote party policy. | |||
The Labour Party was founded in 1900, having emerged from the ] and ]. It was electorally weak before the ], but in the early 1920s overtook the ] to become the main opposition to the Conservative Party, and briefly formed a minority government under ] in 1924. In 1929, Labour for the first time became the largest party in the House of Commons with 287 seats, but fell short of a majority, forming another minority government. In 1931, in response to the ], MacDonald formed ] with Conservative and Liberal support, which led to his expulsion from the party. Labour was soundly defeated by his coalition in the 1931 election, winning only 52 seats, but began to recover in 1935, with 154 seats. | |||
The Labour Party grew out of the ] movement and ] political parties of the 19th century; thus it officially espouses ].<ref></ref> Under Tony Blair's leadership, however, the party has adopted a number of ]-oriented policies following its failures in the general elections of ] and ], most notably. This has led many observers to style the Labour Party as ] or ] rather than democratic socialist. | |||
During the ], Labour served in the ], after which it won a majority in the 1945 election. ] enacted extensive ] and established the modern ] and ] before losing power in 1951. Under ] and ], Labour again governed ] and ]. The party then entered a period of intense internal division which ended in the defeat of its left wing by the mid-1980s. After electoral defeats to the Conservatives in 1987 and 1992, ] took the party to the ] as part of his ] project, which governed under Blair and then ] from 1997 to 2010. After further electoral defeats in the 2010s, ] again moved Labour to the political centre from 2020 and has governed since 2024. | |||
==Party constitution and structure== | |||
], Leader of the Labour Party since 1994]] | |||
The Labour Party is a membership organisation consisting of ], ], ], and the ], with which it has an electoral agreement. Members who are elected to parliamentary positions take part in the ] (PLP) and European Parliamentary Labour Party (EPLP). The party's decision-making bodies, on a national level, formally include the ] (NEC), ], and ] (NPF) — although in practice the Parliamentary leadership has the final say. Questions of internal party democracy have frequently provoked disputes in the party. | |||
Labour is the largest party in the ] (Welsh Parliament), being the only party in the ]. Labour is a member of the ] and the ], and holds observer status in the ]. The party includes semi-autonomous ], ], ] and ]; it supports the ] (SDLP) in Northern Ireland, while still organising there. {{As of|March 2024}}, Labour has 366,604 registered members. | |||
For many years, Labour has had a policy of ] ] and the ] by consent, and had not allowed residents of ] to apply for membership, instead supporting the ] ] (SDLP). Labour has a ] element in its ranks, many of whom assisted in the foundation in 1995 of the ] lead by ]. McCartney was Member of Parliament (MP) for ] from 1995 until 2001, and remains an ] (MLA) and the party's leader. The 2003 Labour Party Conference accepted legal advice that the party could not continue to prohibit residents of the province joining, but the National Executive has decided not to organise or contest elections there. | |||
== History == | |||
The party had 201,374 members on 31 December, 2004 according to accounts filed with the ]. In that year it had an income of about £29,000,000 (of which £3,500,000 from membership fees) and expenditure of about £32,000,000. | |||
{{main|History of the Labour Party (UK)|History of the socialist movement in the United Kingdom}} | |||
=== Origins to 1890s=== | |||
Party electoral manifestos have not contained the term ''socialism'' since 1992 although when Clause 4 was abolished the words "the Labour Party is a democratic socialist party" were added to the party's constitution. | |||
], (1856–1915), first leader of the Labour Party contingent in the House of Commons]] | |||
The origins of what became the Labour Party emerged in the late 19th century. It represented the interests of the labour unions and more generally the growing urban working class. Hundreds of thousands of workers had recently gained voting rights by laws passed in ]. Many different trade unions flourished in the industrial districts. Their leaders used the ] revival tradition to find ways to rally the membership. Several small ] organizations formed and wanted power based on the ]; the most influential was the ], which was made up of ] reformers. ] worked for cooperation among the unions and left-wing groups such as his small ] (ILP).<ref>Martin Pugh, ''Speak for Britain!: a new history of the Labour Party'' (1910), pp. 14–50. </ref> | |||
=== Labour Representation Committee (1900–1906) === | |||
==History== | |||
{{main|Labour Representation Committee (1900)}} | |||
===Early years=== | |||
The Labour Party was formed by unions and left-wing groups to create a distinct political voice for the working class in Britain. In 1900 the ] (TUC), an umbrella body for most unions, sponsored a national conference to unite into a single party that would sponsor candidates for the House of Commons. The conference created the ] (LRC), as a coalition of separate groups with ] as secretary. The fearsome issue for labour was the 1901 ] legal decision which made most strikes illegal; the urgent goal was to get Parliament to reverse it. The LRC cut a secret deal with the ]: they would not compete against each other in the ].<ref>Frank Bealey, "The Electoral Arrangement between the Labour Representation Committee and the Liberal Party," ''Journal of Modern History'' 28#4 (1956), pp. 353–373 {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240701112156/https://www.jstor.org/stable/1871799 |date=1 July 2024 }}</ref> Voters gave the Liberals a landslide with 397 seats out of 664; the new LRC won 29 seats. The LRC renamed itself "The Labour Party", with veteran MP Keir Hardie narrowly winning the role of leader of the ] (PLP).<ref>Pugh, ''Speak for Britain!'', pp. 52–68.</ref> | |||
The Labour Party's origins lie in the late 19th century numeric increase of the urban proletariat and the extension of the ] to ] males, when it became apparent that there was a need for a political party to represent the interests and needs of those groups ] judgement, which limited certain types of picketing]. Some members of the trade union movement became interested in moving into the political field, and after the extensions of the franchise in 1867 and 1885, the ] endorsed some trade-union sponsored candidates. In addition, several small socialist groups had formed around this time with the intention of linking the movement to actual political policies. Among these were the ], the intellectual and largely ] ], the ] and the ]. | |||
=== Early years (1906–1923) === | |||
]In 1899 a ] member of the Amalgamated Society of Railway Servants, Thomas R. Steels, proposed in his union branch that the ] call a special conference to bring together all the left-wing organisations and form them into a single body which would sponsor Parliamentary candidates. The motion was passed at all stages by the TUC, and this special conference was held at the Memorial Hall, Farringdon Street, ] on February 27-28, 1900. The meeting was attended by a broad spectrum of working-class and left-wing organisations; trade unions representing about one third of the membership of the TUC delegates. | |||
] | |||
The Labour Party's first national conference in Belfast in 1907 helped shape many of its key policies. Never fully resolved was the puzzle of where the final decisions ought to lie—in the annual conference? the Parliamentary Labour Party (PLP)? The local chapters? The Trade Union Congress (which brought together the heads of most unions)? The conference created a "conscience clause" allowing diversity of opinions rather than a rigid orthodoxy. Irish politics proved to be so different that the Party simply quit Ireland and worked only in England, Scotland and Wales. In 1908–1910 the Party supported the momentous and largely successful Liberal battles in favor of a welfare state and against the Unionist/Conservative Party and against the veto power of the House of Lords. Growth continued, with 42 Labour MPs elected to the House of Commons in the December 1910 general election. During World War I, the party experienced internal divisions over support for the war effort, but also saw one of its top leaders ], serve in the powerful war cabinet.<ref>{{cite book |chapter-url=https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057/9780230595583_2 |doi=10.1057/9780230595583_2 |chapter=Out of the bowels of the Movement: The Trade Unions and the Origins of the Labour Party 1900–18 |title=The Labour Party |date=2000 |last1=Taylor |first1=Robert |pages=8–49 |isbn=978-0-333-74650-9 |access-date=2 July 2024 |archive-date=13 September 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240913233623/https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057/9780230595583_2 |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
The Conference created an association called the ] (LRC), meant to coordinate attempts to support MPs, MPs sponsored by trade unions and representing the working-class population. It had no single leader. In the absence of one, the Independent Labour Party nominee ] was elected as Secretary. He had the difficult task of keeping the various strands of opinions in the LRC united. The October 1900 'Khaki election' came too soon for the new party to effectively campaign. Only 15 candidatures were sponsored, but two were successful: ] in ] and ] in ]. | |||
After the war, the party focused on building a strong constituency-based support network and adopted a comprehensive statement of policies titled "Labour and the New Social Order". In 1918, ] was added to Labour's constitution, committing the party to work towards common ownership of the means of production, distribution, and exchange. Socialism was vaguely promised, but there was no effort made to draw up detailed plans on what that would mean or how it could be accomplished.<ref>Stanley Shapiro, "The Passage of Power: Labor and the New Social Order." ''Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society'' 120.6 (1976): 464–474. </ref> | |||
Support for the LRC was boosted by the 1901 ], a dispute between strikers and a railway company that ended with the union ordered to pay £23,000 damages for a strike. The judgement effectively made strikes illegal since employers could recoup the cost of lost business from the unions. The apparent acquiescence of the Conservative government of ] to industrial and business interests (traditionally the allies of the ] in opposition to the Conservative's landed interests) intensified support for the LRC against a government that appeared to have little concern for the industrial proletariat and its problems. The LRC won two by-elections in 1902–1903. | |||
The ] greatly expanded the electorate, enfranchising all men and most women. The party concentrated its appeal on the new electorate with considerable success among working men, but far less success among women. As the Liberal Party collapsed, Labour became the official opposition to the Conservative government. Its support for the war effort demonstrated that the Labour Party was a patriotic and moderate force that solved problems and did not threaten class warfare.<ref>Keith Laybourn, "The rise of Labour and the decline of Liberalism: the state of the debate." ''History'' 80.259 (1995): 207–226. </ref> | |||
] | |||
In the ], the LRC won 29 seats — helped by the secret 1903 pact between ] and ] Chief Whip ], which aimed at avoiding Labour/Liberal contests in the interest of removing the Conservatives from office. | |||
=== Labour forms a government (1923–1924)=== | |||
In their first meeting after the election, the group's Members of Parliament decided adopt the name "The Labour Party" (], ]). ], who had taken a leading role in getting the party established, was elected as Chairman of the Parliamentary Labour Party (in effect, the Leader), although only by one vote over ] after several ballots. In the party's early years, the ] (ILP) provided much of its activist base as the party did not have an individual membership until 1918 and operated as a conglomerate of affiliated bodies until that date. The ] provided much of the intellectual stimulus for the party. One of the first acts of the new Liberal government was to reverse the Taff Vale judgement. | |||
{{Main|First MacDonald ministry}} | |||
The ] was a pivotal achievement with the formation of the first Labour government. The Conservatives called for high tariffs. Labour and Liberals both wanted free trade. Labour leader ] formed a minority government with Liberal support that lasted 10 months. The only domestic achievement was the ], which expanded the large-scale public housing program that started in 1919 with support from all three major parties.<ref>David Marquand, ''Ramsay Macdonald''(1977), pp. 297–328.</ref> MacDonald was much more successful in foreign policy. He helped end the impasse over German payment of reparations by enlisting Washington to launch the Dawes Plan. Much more controversial was his decision to recognize the Soviet Union.<ref>Marquand, ''Ramsay Macdonald''(1977), pp. 329–356.</ref> That ignited an anti-Communist backlash that exploded four days before the 1924 election in the fake ] in which Kremlin supposedly called for revolutionary uprising by British workers. ] saw the Conservatives return to power, benefiting from the Zinoviev letter and the continuing collapse of the Liberal vote. The Labour share of the popular vote went up, but it lost seats. Above all the moderation of the Macdonald government put to rest the lingering fears that a Labour victory would produce a violent class war.<ref>Paul W. Doerr, ''British Foreign Policy, 1919-1939'' (1998), pp. 78–83.</ref> | |||
===The failed general strike (1926–1929) === | |||
The recession of 1908-09 and subsequent rise in unemployment led to increased industrial unrest and desire for radical change among the working class led to increasing support for ] and for change through parliament. In the two 1910 elections, Labour gained 40 and then 42 seats. Support grew further for Labour during the 1910–1914 period along with an unprecedented level of industrial action with ], ], cotton workers, ], ] and many other groups all organising strikes and with many sympathy strikes also occurring. This was no doubt helped by the sometimes heavy-handed measures of the Liberal government (e.g., ]'s sending troops to the ] in 1910 against coal miners, with some fatalities resulting). | |||
In 1925–26, coal sales fell and the mining companies demanded an increase in hours and a cut in wages. The miners were totally opposed and planned a strike. The TUC coalition of unions decided it would support the miners by a nationwide general strike that would paralyze most of the national economy. A strike was postponed when the Conservative government offered a subsidy for wages, but it also prepared to deal with the threatened general strike. Meanwhile, the TUC failed to make preparations. It ignored the Labour Party in and out of Parliament and in turn party leaders opposed a national strike. The ] failed after 9 days as the government plan devised by Winston Churchill proved highly effective in keeping the economy open while minimizing violence. In the long run, however, the episode tended to strengthen working class support for Labour, and it gained in the 1929 general election, forming a second government with Liberal help.<ref>Marquand, ''Ramsay Macdonald'' (1977), pp. 422–440, 483–488.</ref> | |||
=== Second Labour Ministry in 1929 and failures in 1930s === | |||
===The lead up to the first Labour government (1923)=== | |||
{{Main|Second MacDonald ministry}} | |||
During the ] the Labour Party split between supporters and opponents of the conflict and opposition within the party to the war grew as time went on. ], a notable anti-war campaigner, resigned as leader of the Parliamentary Labour Party and ] became the main figure of authority within the Party and was soon accepted into ]'s War Cabinet. | |||
], first Labour prime minister (1924 and 1929–1931).]] | |||
Once again with Liberal help, MacDonald became prime minister following the successful ]. There were some promising achievements in foreign policy, notably the ] that seemed to resolve the issue of German reparations, and the ] of 1930 that limited submarine construction.<ref>Paul W. Doerr, ''British Foreign Policy, 1919–1939'' (1998) pp.106–107, 119–120.</ref> Some minor legislation was passed, notably a ]. Overnight in October 1929 the world economy plunged into the ], and no party had an answer as tax revenue plunged, unemployment doubled to 2.5 million (in late 1930), prices fell, and government spending on unemployment benefits soared. Conditions became much worse in 1931 as the banks became unable to loan the government enough to cover the growing deficit. In an era before ], the strong consensus among experts was for the government to balance its budget.<ref>Hugh Dalton, ''Principles of public finance'' (1954) p. 213–220 .</ref> | |||
Spending was cut again and again but MacDonald and his ] ] argued that the only way to get an emergency loan from New York banks was to cut unemployment benefits by 10%. They pointed out that cost of food was down 15% and overall prices were down 10%. But in the cabinet most Labour members were vehemently opposed—they demanded new taxes on the rich instead. MacDonald gave up and on 23 August went to King ] and resigned the government. Unexpectedly the monarch insisted that the only patriotic solution was for MacDonald to stay and form an all-party "national government" with the Conservatives, which he did the next day. The Labour Party felt betrayed and expelled MacDonald and Snowden. | |||
Despite mainstream Labour Party's support for the Coalition, the ] was instrumental in opposing mobilisation through organisations such as the ] and a Labour Party affiliate, the ] organised a number of unofficial strikes. | |||
The new ] kept Macdonald and Snowden and two others, replacing the rest of the Laborites with Conservatives. The ] Labour had 6.3 million votes (31 percent), down from 8.0 million and 37 percent in 1929. Nevertheless, it was reduced to a helpless minority of only 52 members, chiefly from coal mining districts. The old leadership was gone. One bright note came in 1934 when ] led Labour to take control of the ] for the first time ever.<ref>Pelling, ''A Short History of the Labour Party,'' pp.63–79.</ref><ref>R. Bassett, ''Nineteen thirty-one political crisis'' (1958) pp. 127–182. </ref> | |||
In the ], Labour recovered to 8.0 million votes (38 percent), and ] became Minority Leader. The Party now had 154 seats but had minimal influence in Parliament. At the local level union leaders, led by ], successfully defeated Communist infiltration.<ref>Andrew Thorpe, ''Britain in the 1930s'' (1992) pp. 41–49.</ref> In foreign policy a strong pacifist element made it slow to support the government's rearmament program. As the threat from ] escalated, the Party gradually abandoned its pacifist stance and came to support re-armament, largely due to the efforts of Bevin and ]. By 1937 they had persuaded the Party to oppose ]'s policy of ].<ref>Pelling, ''A Short History of the Labour Party,'' pp.79–87.</ref><ref>L. C. B. Seaman, ''Post-Victorian Britain: 1902-1951'' (1966) pp. 205–246.</ref> However, as late as April 1939 the Party strongly opposed conscription for the Army.<ref>Kenneth Harris, ''Attlee'' (1982) pp.161–162.</ref> | |||
] resigned from the Cabinet in 1917 amidst calls for Party unity. The growth in Labour's local activist base and organisation was reflected in the elections following the War, with the ] movement now providing its own resources to the ] after the armistice. The Co-operative Party later reached an electoral agreement with the Labour Party. | |||
=== Wartime coalition (1940–1945) === | |||
The Liberal Party split — between supporters of leader David Lloyd George and former leader ] allowed the Labour Party to co-opt some of the Liberals' support, and by the ] Labour had supplanted the ] as the second party in the United Kingdom and as the official opposition to the ]. | |||
{{see also|Churchill war ministry}} | |||
The party returned to power in May 1940, with about a third of the seats in the ] under Churchill. Attlee was given a new position as ]. He was in charge of the cabinet when Churchill was absent, and handled domestic affairs, working closely with Bevin as ].<ref>John Bew, ''Clement Attlee'' (2017) pp.245–336.</ref> The war set in motion profound demands for reform. This mood was epitomised in the ] of 1942, by the Liberal economist ]. The ''Report'' assumed that the maintenance of full employment would be the aim of post-war governments, and that this would provide the basis for the ]. Immediately upon its release, it sold hundreds of thousands of copies. All major parties committed themselves to fulfilling this aim, but the Labour Party was seen by the electorate as the party most likely to follow it through.<ref>Steven Fielding, "What did 'the people' want?: the meaning of the 1945 general election". ''Historical Journal'' 35#3 (1992): 623–639 {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170302033054/http://www.jstor.org/stable/2639633 |date=2 March 2017 }}.</ref> | |||
=== Attlee government (1945–1951) === | |||
Labour's main electoral bases resided in the industrial areas of ], the ], ] and ]. Because of the concentrated geographical nature of Labour's support, industrial downturns tended to hit Labour voters directly. Anecdotal evidence suggests that party membership was often working-class but also included many middle-class radicals, former liberals and socialists. Accordingly, the more middle-class branches in London and the South of England tended to be more left-wing and radical than those in the primary industrial areas. | |||
{{main|Attlee ministry}} | |||
], the first Labour Prime Minister, 1924, 1929–35 (])]] | |||
], Prime Minister (1945–1951)]] | |||
With the victory in Europe, the coalition broke up in May 1945. The ] gave Labour a landslide victory, as they won 12 million votes (50% of the total) and 393 seats.<ref>William Harrington, and Peter Young. ''The 1945 revolution'' (1978) pp. 186-206 ''''</ref> The Labour government proved the most radical in British history. It presided over a policy of nationalising major industries and utilities including the ], coal mining, the steel industry, electricity, gas and inland transport (including railways, road haulage and canals). It developed and implemented the "cradle to grave" ]. It created the ] (NHS), which gave publicly funded medical treatment for all.<ref>John Bew, ''Clement Attlee: The Man Who Made Modern Britain''(Oxford UP, 2017) pp. 397–409. </ref> | |||
Nationalisation primarily affected weak and poorly managed industries, opening the hope that centralized planning would reverse the decline. Iron and steel, however, were already well-run and nationalization was denounced and later reversed by the Conservatives.<ref>John Singleton, "Labour, the Conservatives and nationalisation." in ''The political economy of nationalisation in Britain, 1920–1950'' (1995): 13-33.</ref> | |||
=== The first Labour government (1924)=== | |||
{{mainarticle|First Labour Government (UK)}} | |||
Labour formed its first government with Liberal support in January 1924, with ] as ]; the government collapsed after only nine months when the Liberals voted for a Select Committee inquiry, which MacDonald had declared to be a vote of confidence. The ensuing ] saw the publication, four days before polling day, of the notorious ], which implicated Labour in a plot for a Communist revolution in Britain, and the Conservatives were returned to power. The Zinoviev letter is now generally believed to have been a forgery. | |||
The economy was precarious during the age of austerity, as wartime restrictions and rationing continued, and the wartime bombing damage was slowly being rebuilt at great cost.<ref>David Kynaston, ''Austerity Britain, 1945–1951'' (2008)</ref> The Treasury depended heavily on American money, especially ] at a low 2% interest rate, and the gift of $2.694 billion in ] funds. Canada also provided gifts and $1.25 billion in loans.<ref>Derek H. Aldcroft, ''The British Economy: Volume 1 The Years of Turmoil, 1920-1951'' (1986) pp.206, 209. .</ref><ref>Michael J. Hogan, ''The Marshall Plan: America, Britain and the Reconstruction of Western Europe, 1947-1952'' (Cambridge Up, 1987), pp. 29, 31, 48, 82–84.</ref><ref>Kenneth O. Morgan, ''Labour in Power, 1945-1951'' (1984) pp.270–272, 366.</ref><ref>Norman Moss, ''Picking up the Reins: America, Britain and the Postwar World''(Duckworth, 2008) pp.131–151.</ref> | |||
===The split under MacDonald=== | |||
] | |||
The ] left the Labour Party for the first time as the largest grouping in the House of Commons with 37.1% of the popular vote (actually slightly less than the Conservatives) and 287 seats, although still reliant on Liberal support to form a minority government. | |||
The government began the process of dismantling the ], starting with independence to India and Pakistan in 1947, followed by Burma (Myanmar) and Ceylon (Sri Lanka) the following year. It ] to the United Nations in 1948.<ref>Bew, ''Clement Attlee'' (2017) pp. 426–443.</ref> Elsewhere independence movements were much weaker and London's policy was to keep the Empire in business.<ref>John Darwin. "The Crisis of Empire, 1945–48." in ''Britain and Decolonisation: The retreat from empire in the post-war world'' (1988): 69-125.</ref> | |||
Soon after the election there was a worldwide collapse in share values that was the forerunner of the ]. After consultation with ], Ramsey MacDonald and other Labour MP's including most cabinet ministers entered into a coalition with most of the Conservatives and Liberals in what was known as the ]. Ramsey MacDonald remained Prime Minister but was expelled from the Labour Party along with many others who joined in the new government. Ramsey MacDonald sought re-election in ] and created a new ] party, made up of those Labour ministers and other Labour MP's who accepted the coalition. | |||
Under ]'s leadership, London pushed Washington into an anti-Communist coalition that launched the ] in 1947 and established the ] military alliance against the USSR in 1949.<ref>Robert Frazier, "Did Britain Start the Cold War? Bevin and the Truman Doctrine" ''The Historical Journal'' (1984) 27#3:715-727. doi:10.1017/S0018246X00018045</ref> Furthermore, independent of Washington London committed large sums to developing a secret ].<ref>Richard Gott, “The Evolution of the Independent British Deterrent.” ''International Affairs'' 39#2 (1963), pp. 238–52. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2611300.</ref> | |||
===Opposition during the time of the National Government=== | |||
] was elected in 1931 as Labour leader succeeding Ramsey MacDonald but lost his seat in the 1931 General Election (in which Labour got 30.8% of the popular vote and 52 seats) and was succeeded as leader in 1932 by pacifist ], disagreements over Foreign Policy notably in relation to George Lansbury's opposition to any notion of applying sanctions against Italy, George Lansbury resigned during the 1935 Labour Party Conference and was succeeded by ] who achieved a major revival in Labour's fortunes in the ] winning a similar number of votes to those Labour attained in 1929 and actually at 38% of the popular vote the highest percentage of those turning out to vote that Labour had ever achieved and with 154 seats a major step in its recovery with the National Government increasingly being in effect a government of the Conservative Party and allies lead by Conservative leader ] and the main three party structure beginning to re-emerge after a period of fragmentation. | |||
In the ], Labour narrowly lost to Churchill's Conservatives, despite receiving the larger share of the popular vote. Its 13.9 million vote total was the highest ever. Most of its innovation were accepted by the Conservatives and Liberals and became part of the "]" that lasted until the Thatcher era of the 1980s.<ref>Brian Harrison, “The Rise, Fall and Rise of Political Consensus in Britain since 1940.” ''History'' 84#274 (1999), pp. 301–24. </ref> | |||
Labour achieved a number of remarkable by-election upsets in the later part of the 1930's despite the world depression having come to an end and unemployment falling. | |||
=== Internal feuds (1951–1964) === | |||
===Wartime Coalition=== | |||
], Leader of the Opposition (1955–1963).|upright]] | |||
] | |||
Labour spent 13 years in opposition. It suffered an ideological split, between the left-wing followers of ] (known as ]) and the right-wing following ] (known as ]). The economy recovered as Conservatives hung together and chanted, "You Never Had It So Good.".<ref>Jeremy Black, '' A history of Britain: 1945 to Brexit'' ( Indiana University Press, 2017) p. 130.</ref><ref>Peter Hennessy, ''Having it so good: Britain in the fifties'' (Penguin UK, 2007).</ref> The ageing Attlee contested the ], which saw Labour lose ground; he retired and was replaced by Gaitskell. Internal squabbling now focused on the issues of ], Britain's entry into the ] (EEC), and ] of the Labour Party Constitution, with its commitment to nationalisation. Gaitskell led Labour to a third consecutive defeat at the ] despite the party appearing more united than it had been for some time. Gaitskell responded by attempting to remove Clause IV (the nationalisation clause) from the party constitution, but this was unsuccessful. Gaitskell died suddenly in 1963, and cleared the way for ] to lead the party.<ref>Alastair J. Reid and Henry Pelling, ''A Short History of the Labour Party'' (12th ed. 2005) pp.94–103 .</ref> | |||
When ] resigned as Prime Minister after the defeat at ] in 1940, incoming Prime Minister ] decided that it was important to bring the other main parties into the government and have a Wartime Coalition similar to that in the First World War, Clement Attlee became ] for the remainder of the duration of the War in Europe although the Coalition broke up after Nazi Germany was defeated while the Allies were still fighting the Japanese. | |||
=== Wilson as leader (1964–1974) === | |||
===Post-War victory to the 1960s=== | |||
{{main|Labour government, 1964–1970}} | |||
With the end of the war in Europe in May 1945, Labour resolved not to repeat the Liberals' error of 1918, and withdrew from the government to contest the ] (July 5) in opposition to Churchill's Conservatives. Surprising many observers (especially overseas), Labour won a landslide majority, reflecting voters' perception of it as the party most able to guide the country through the early years of peace. | |||
], Prime Minister (1964–1970 and 1974–1976)]] | |||
A downturn in the economy and a series of scandals in the early 1960s had engulfed the Conservative government by 1963. The Labour Party returned to government with a 4-seat majority under Wilson in the ] but a landslide increased its majority to 96 in the ].<ref>Ben Pimlott, ''Harold Wilson'' (HarperCollins, 1992) pp.282–309, 395–404. </ref><ref>David E. Butler, and Anthony King, ''The British General Election of 1966'' (1966) pp.1-22 .</ref> | |||
Labour was responsible for a number of sweeping social and cultural reforms mostly under the leadership of ] ] such as the abolition of the ]; the legalisation of ]; loosening restrictions on ], the abolition of ], and legislation to ]<ref>Peter Dorey, "Social and Sexual Liberalisation," in Andrew S. Crines and Kevin Hickson, eds., ''Harold Wilson: The Unprincipled Prime Minister?: A Reappraisal of Harold Wilson'' (Biteback Publishing, 2016) pp.165–203.</ref> | |||
Clement Attlee's government was one of the most radical British governments of the 20th century. It presided over a policy of selective ] (the ], coal, electricity, gas, the railways and iron & steel). It developed the "cradle to grave" ] under health minister ]. And to this day the party still considers the creation in 1948 of Britain's tax-funded ] its proudest achievement. | |||
The government put heavy emphasis on expanding opportunities through education: ] was expanded at the secondary level and the ] created for adults.<ref>Jane Martin, "Education Policy," in Crines and Hickson, eds., ''Harold Wilson'' (2016) pp.131–148.</ref> | |||
With the ] under way, Attlee's government secretly decided to proceed with the development of Britain's ], in opposition to the pacifist and anti-nuclear stances of a large element inside the Labour Party. Defence became one of the divisive issues for Labour itself, especially defence spending (which reached 10% of GDP in 1950 during the ]). ] eventually left the government over this issue and the introduction of ] which Harold Wilson (]) also resigned over. The government also faced a fuel crisis and a balance of payments crisis in 1947. Labour narrowly lost the ] to the Conservatives (in a coalition with the ], despite their receiving a larger share of the popular vote and, in fact, their highest vote ever numerically. | |||
Wilson's first period as Prime Minister coincided with a period of relatively low unemployment and economic prosperity, it was however hindered by significant problems with a large trade deficit which it had inherited from the previous government. The first three years of the government were spent in an ultimately doomed attempt to stave off the continued devaluation of the pound. Labour went on to unexpectedly lose the ] to the Conservatives under ].<ref>Philip Ziegler, ''Harold Wilson: The Authorized Biography Life of Lord Wilson of Rievaulx'' (Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1993) PP.346–354 .</ref> Labour in opposition kept Wilson as Leader. The 1970s proved a difficult time to be in government for both the Conservatives and Labour due to the ], which caused high inflation and a global recession. The Labour Party was returned to power again under Wilson a few days after the ], forming a minority government with the support of the ]s.<ref>David Butler, ''The British general election of February 1974'' (1974) pp.10–26, 270–273. </ref> In a bid to gain a majority, Prime Minister Wilson soon called an election for ]. Labour won a slim majority of three, gaining 18 seats taking its total to 319.<ref>Ziegler, ''Harold Wilson'' pp Death.400–421 .</ref> | |||
Throughout the 1950s and early 1960s, the party was split between moderate modernisers led by ] (associated with the main trade unions), and the more radical socialist elements within the party. This split, and the popularity of the Conservative governments of the period (which themselves had felt obliged to preserve most of the changes made by the Attlee government and build on many of these), kept the party out of power for thirteen years although they still got a substantial vote in 1955 comparable to their 1950 vote but the ] saw Labour returning almost to their lower levels of support of the 1930's. | |||
=== Majority to minority (1974–1979) === | |||
], Labour Prime Minister 1964–1970 and 1974-1976]] | |||
{{main|Labour government, 1974–1979}} | |||
A downturn in the economy, along with a series of scandals in the early 1960s (the most notorious being the ]), engulfed the Conservative government by 1963. The Labour party returned to government with a wafer-thin 4 seat majority under ] in the ], and increased their majority to 98 in ] remaining in power until the ] which contrary to expectations during the campaign they lost. | |||
], Prime Minister (1976–1979)]] | |||
In March 1974 Wilson was appointed prime minister ]; he called a ] in October 1974, which gave Labour a small majority. During his second term as prime minister, Wilson oversaw the ] that confirmed the UK's membership of the ].<ref>Ziegler, ''Wilson'' (1995) pp. 400–491.</ref> | |||
When Wilson suddenly announced his retirement in March 1976, Callaghan ] to be elected Leader of the Labour Party; he was appointed prime minister on 5 April 1976. By now Labour had lost its narrow majority. To stay in power Callaghan made a ] with the ]. While this initially proved stable, it could not survive in the face of major industrial disputes and widespread strikes in the 1978–79 "]", as well as the defeat of the ]. Minor parties joined the ] to pass a ] in Callaghan on 28 March 1979. Callaghan led Labour to defeat at the ] and was replaced by Conservative ]. The 1979 defeat marked the beginning of 18 years in opposition for the Labour Party, the longest in its history. According to historian ], the fall of Callaghan meant the passing of an old obsolete system, as well as the end of ], ], subsidised welfare payments, and labour union power.<ref>Kenneth O. Morgan, ''Britain Since 1945: The People's Peace'' (Oxford UP, 2001). p. 437.</ref> | |||
The 1960s Labour government had a different emphasis from its 1940s predecessor. ] famously referred to the "white heat of technology", referring to the modernisation of British industry. This was to be achieved through the swift adoption of new technology, aided by government-funded infrastructure improvements and the creation of large high-tech public sector corporations guided by a Ministry of Technology. Economic planning through the new Department for Economic Affairs was to improve the ], whilst Labour carefully targeted taxation aimed at "luxury" goods and services. | |||
=== Thatcherism and Labour's civil war (1979–1992) === | |||
Labour had difficulty managing the economy under the "Keynesian consensus" and the international markets instinctively mistrusted the party. Events derailed much of the initial optimism, especially a ] which mounted until 1967 when the government was forced into ] of the pound and pressure on sterling was intensified by disagreements over US foreign policy. ] publicly supported America's ] but refused to provide British assistance. This infuriated ] who in response felt little obligation to support the pound. For much of the remaining Parliament the government followed stricter controls in public spending and the necessary austerity measures caused consternation amongst the Party membership and the trade unions, unions which by this time were gaining ever greater political power. | |||
{{see also|Shadow Cabinet of Michael Foot|Shadow Cabinet of Neil Kinnock|Social Democratic Party (UK)}} | |||
], Leader of the Opposition (1980–1983)|upright]] | |||
] and as the official logotype from 1980 to 1987, more specifically under Foot's leadership.|left]] | |||
Following 1979 the Labour Party found itself overwhelmed by the Conservative government led by a highly aggressive ]. From the right she largely rejected the ] on economic and social policies that had bipartisan support since the 1950s. At first Thatcher's economic reforms were doing poorly. Argentina's invasion of a British possession in the ] in Spring 1982 transformed British politics. Thatcher's aggressive reaction produced a smashing victory and national elation, guaranteeing Conservatives a massive landslide victory in the ]. Thatcher's successful ] further weakened the Labour base. It took a decade for Labour to recover.<ref>Kenneth O. Morgan, ''The People's Peace'' (2001) pp 456–478, 490–491, 500–501.</ref> | |||
Labour's inward turn flared into a civil war between left and right. The party came under the control of young middle-class left-wing activists in the local constituencies. The left was led by ] and ]. They were keen on radical proposals as presented in the 1983 manifesto entitled "The New Hope for Britain". It called for extensive nationalisation of industry, with heavily centralized economic planning, and many additional controls on business.<ref>The 1983 manifesto entitled "The New Hope for Britain" {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150924123945/http://www.politicsresources.net/area/uk/man/lab83.htm |date=24 September 2015 }}</ref> It demanded unilateral nuclear disarmament and withdrawal from the European Community. Labour's manifesto was a repudiation of the ] from the left. It alienated so many moderates, skilled workers and the general public that it was ridiculed as the "]." Some top leaders quit the Labour Party and formed a new ], but it could not survive. After Labour's massive defeat in the ], ] replaced Foot. He defeated the left wing, reversed the highly controversial Manifesto proposals, expelled extremist factions like the Trotskyist ], and began a process of modernization and acceptance of many Thatcherite innovations.<ref>Peter Jenkins, ''Mrs. Thatcher's Revolution: The Ending of the Socialist Era'' (1988) pp. 102-128. </ref><ref>Brian Brivati and Richard Heffernan, eds. ''The Labour Party: A Centenary History'' (2000) pp. 112-142, 376-377.</ref> | |||
Labour in the 1960s made major steps in introducing the ] notably the legalisation of ] and ], and the abolition of the ] (except for a small number of offences - notably ]) and various legislation addressing ] and ]. Another significant achievement was the creation of the ]. In Wilson's defence, his supporters also emphasise the easing of ] for non-contributory welfare benefits, the linking of pensions to earnings, and the provision of industrial-injury benefits. | |||
=== Modernisers take charge (1992–1997)=== | |||
===The 1970s=== | |||
], ensured that the red flag image would disappear, with the party's new symbol being the gentle emblem of the red rose.<ref>Kenneth Morgan, ''Britain since 1945: The People's Peace'' (2001) p.510.</ref> This was the party's logo from 1987 to 2007.|upright]] | |||
In the ], ]'s Conservatives narrowly defeated Harold Wilson's government reflecting some disillusionment amongst many who had voted Labour in 1966. The Conservatives quickly ran into difficulties, alienating ] and many Unionists in their own party by imposing direct rule on Ulster. ] resigned the Conservative whip and joined the ], switching from his ] seat to ], and advising those on the British mainland to vote Labour because of the issues of EEC entry and immigration (Edward Heath had decided to admit entry to ] ] expelled by ]). | |||
In November 1990, Thatcher resigned and was succeeded by the less confrontational Thatcherite ]. Opinion polls had shown Labour comfortably ahead of the Conservatives largely because of Thatcher's introduction of the highly unpopular ], combined with the fact that the economy was ]. Major replaced the poll tax but Kinnock energized Labour with the theme "It's Time for a Change", after more than a decade of unbroken Conservative rule.<ref>Dennis Kavanaugh, "Opposition" in Dennis Kavanaugh and Anthony Selden, eds ''The Major Effect'' (1994) pp. 145-153.</ref> The ] gave Conservatives a victory with a much-reduced majority of 21. It was a deeply disappointing result for Labour. For the first time in over 30 years there was serious doubt among the public and the media as to whether Labour could ever return to government. Kinnock resigned as leader and was succeeded by ].<ref>David Butler, and Dennis Kavanagh, eds ''The British General Election of 1992'' (1992) pp.247–275. </ref> | |||
], Leader of the Opposition (1983–1992)]] | |||
The damage to the economy on ] in September 1992 undermined the Conservative reputation for superior economic competence. By December, Labour had a comfortable lead in the opinion polls. The recession ended in early 1993 and was followed by a sharp fall in unemployment, together with sustained economic growth. Nevertheless, the Labour lead in the polls remained strong. Smith died suddenly in May 1994, and ] became leader. | |||
Once again the battle resumed between the old guard on the left and the younger "modernisers". The old guard argued that they were regaining strength under Smith's strong leadership. Blair, the leader of the modernisers, warned that the long-term weaknesses had to be reversed. He argued that the party was too locked into a base that was shrinking, since it was based on the working-class, on trade unions and on residents of subsidised council housing. Blair said that the rapidly growing middle class was largely ignored, as well as more ambitious working-class families. He argued that they aspired to become middle-class and accepted the Conservative argument that traditional Labour was holding ambitious people back with higher tax policies. To present a fresh face and new policies to the electorate, ] needed more than fresh leaders; it had to jettison outdated policies, argued the modernisers.<ref>David Butler and Dennis Kavanagh, eds., ''The British general election of 1997'' (1997), pp 46–67.</ref> Calling on the slogan, "]" Blair defeated the union element and ended ] by leaders of labour unions.{{sfn|Rentoul|2001|pp=206–218}} Blair and the modernisers called for radical adjustment of Party goals by repealing "Clause IV", the historic commitment to nationalisation of industry. This was achieved in 1995.{{sfn|Rentoul|2001|pp=249–266}} | |||
Labour returned to power again a few weeks after the ] forming a minority government with Ulster Unionist support. The Conservatives were unable to form a government as they had fewer seats, even though they had received more votes. It was the first General Election since 1924 in which both main parties received less than 40% of the popular vote, and was the first of six successive General Elections in which Labour failed to reach 40% of the popular vote. In a bid for Labour to gain a majority, a second election was soon called for ] in which Labour, still with Harold Wilson as leader, scraped a majority of 5, gaining just 18 seats and taking their total to 319. | |||
=== New Labour (1994–2010) === | |||
The 1970s proved to be a very difficult time for the Heath, Wilson and Callaghan administrations. Faced with a mishandled oil crisis, a consequent world-wide economic downturn, and a badly suffering British economy, governments took an ] approach, and companies such as ] were ]. Pressure on ] compounded these problems, and by the middle of the decade 1½ million people were unemployed in the United Kingdom — a previously unthinkable figure. | |||
{{main|New Labour}} | |||
{{see also|Premiership of Tony Blair|Premiership of Gordon Brown}} | |||
{{further|Shadow Cabinet of Tony Blair|First Blair ministry|Second Blair ministry|Third Blair ministry|Brown ministry}}]Blair continued to move the party further to the centre, abandoning the largely symbolic ] at the 1995 mini-conference in a strategy to increase the party's appeal to "]". The political philosophy of New Labour was influenced by the party's development of ]' ] which attempted to provide a synthesis between ] and ]. | |||
], Prime Minister (1997–2007)]] | |||
] was first termed as an alternative branding for the Labour Party, dating from a conference slogan first used by the Labour Party in 1994, which was later seen in a draft manifesto published by the party in 1996, called '']''. It was a continuation of the trend that had begun under the leadership of ]. New Labour as a name has no official status, but remains in common use to distinguish modernisers from those holding to more traditional positions, normally referred to as "Old Labour". | |||
{{blockquote|New Labour is a party of ideas and ideals but not of outdated ideology. What counts is what works. The objectives are radical. The means will be modern.<ref name="Labour-Party.org.uk">{{cite web|url=http://www.labour-party.org.uk/manifestos/1997/1997-labour-manifesto.shtml |title=new Labour because Britain deserves better |publisher=Labour Party |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080731030954/http://www.labour-party.org.uk/manifestos/1997/1997-labour-manifesto.shtml |archive-date=31 July 2008}}</ref>}} | |||
Britain had entered the ] in 1973 while Edward Heath was Prime Minister. Although Harold Wilson and the Labour party had opposed this, in government Wilson switched to backing membership, but was defeated in a special one day Labour conference on the issue<ref>http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/april/26/newsid_2503000/2503155.stm</ref> leading to a national referendum on which the yes and no campaigns were both cross-party - the referendum voted in 1975 to continue Britain's membership by two thirds to one third. This issue later caused catastrophic splits in the Labour Party in the 1980's, leading to the formation of the ]. In the initial legislation during the Heath Government, the Bill affirming Britain's entry was only passed because of a rebellion of 72 Labour MP's led by ] and including future leader ], who voted against the Labour whip and along with Liberal MP's more than countered the effects of Conservative rebels who had voted against the Conservative Whip.<ref>http://www.ampltd.co.uk/digital_guides/cabinet_papers_series_3_part_7/Brief-Chronology-1970-to-1974.aspx</ref> | |||
The Labour Party won the ] in a landslide victory with a parliamentary majority of 179; it was the largest ever Labour majority, and at the time the largest swing to a political party achieved since ]. Over the next decade, a wide range of progressive social reforms were enacted,<ref name="Nigel has written a key list">{{cite web |url=http://www.paultruswell.org.uk/files/300%20Gains.pdf |title=Nigel has written a key list |publisher=Paultruswell.org.uk |access-date=23 July 2015 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061023031150/http://www.paultruswell.org.uk/files/300%20Gains.pdf |archive-date=23 October 2006}}</ref><ref name="Reforms – ISSA">{{cite web |url=http://www.issa.int/Observatory/Country-Profiles/Regions/Europe/United-Kingdom/Reforms2/(id)/3242 |title=Reforms – ISSA |publisher=Issa.int |date=7 January 2004 |access-date=31 May 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160123181245/https://www.issa.int/Observatory/Country-Profiles/Regions/Europe/United-Kingdom/Reforms2/(id)/3242 |archive-date=23 January 2016 |url-status=dead}}</ref> with millions lifted out of poverty during Labour's time in office largely as a result of various tax and benefit reforms.<ref name="dwp.gov.uk">{{cite web |title=Making a difference: Tackling poverty – a progress report |url=http://www.dwp.gov.uk/docs/tackling-poverty.pdf |website=] |access-date=29 August 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110808155642/http://www.dwp.gov.uk/docs/tackling-poverty.pdf |archive-date=8 August 2011}}</ref><ref name="Poverty.org.uk">{{cite web |url=http://www.poverty.org.uk/01/index.shtml |title=UK: numbers in low income |publisher=The Poverty Site |access-date=31 May 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100713230703/http://www.poverty.org.uk/01/index.shtml |archive-date=13 July 2010}}</ref><ref name="oecd.org">{{cite web |url=http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/54/46/45649480.pdf |title=Work, Family, Health, and Well-Being: What We Know and Don't Know about Outcomes for Children |website=] |access-date=26 September 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150721080703/http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/54/46/45649480.pdf |archive-date=21 July 2015 |url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
The Labour Party itself had adopted a left-wing agenda, 'Labour's Programme 1973', a document which pledged to bring about a 'fundamental and irreversible shift in the balance of power and wealth in favour of working people and their families.' This programme referred to a 'far reaching ] between workers and the Government.' Wilson publicly accepted many of the policies of the Programme but the condition of the economy allowed little room for manoeuvre. However, the Government did succeed in replacing the ''Family Allowance'' with the more generous ], and introduced ]. | |||
Among the early acts of Blair's government were the establishment of the ], the ] of power to Scotland, Wales and ], major changes to the regulation of the banking system and the re-creation of a citywide government body for London, the ], with its own elected-]. Combined with a Conservative opposition that had yet to organise effectively under ], and the continuing popularity of Blair, Labour went on to win the ] with a similar majority, dubbed the "quiet landslide" by the media.<ref name="The Daily Telegraph">{{cite news |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/topics/christmas/6873367/QI-Our-Quite-Interesting-Quiz-of-the-Decade-compiled-by-the-elves-from-the-TV-show.html |title=QI: Our Quite Interesting Quiz of the Decade, compiled by the elves from the TV show |work=] |date=26 December 2009 |access-date=14 May 2010 |first1=John |last1=Mitchinson |first2=Justin |last2=Pollard |first3=Molly |last3=Oldfield |first4=Andy |last4=Murray |location=London |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100524074119/http://www.telegraph.co.uk/topics/christmas/6873367/QI-Our-Quite-Interesting-Quiz-of-the-Decade-compiled-by-the-elves-from-the-TV-show.html |archive-date=24 May 2010 |url-status=live}}</ref> In 2003 Labour introduced ], government top-ups to the pay of low-wage workers. | |||
In 1976, faced with declining health and citing his desire to retire on his sixtieth birthday, Wilson surprisingly stood down as Labour Party leader and Prime Minister, and was replaced by ]. The latter immediately removed a number of left-wingers (such as ]) from the cabinet. The autumn of 1976 saw the Labour Government being forced ask the ] (IMF) for a loan to ease the economy through its financial troubles. Conditions attached to the loan required the adoption of a more free-market economic programme and a move away from the party's traditional policies. In the end, the Labour Government did not take out the IMF loan, causing some to question if it was actually needed in the first place. | |||
A perceived turning point was when Blair controversially allied himself with US President ] in supporting the ], which caused him to lose much of his political support.<ref name="Deutsche Welle">{{cite news |url=http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,,745536,00.html |title=European Opposition To Iraq War Grows | Current Affairs |work=] |date=13 January 2003 |access-date=13 April 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120123164522/http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,,745536,00.html |archive-date=23 January 2012 |url-status=live}}</ref> The ], among many, considered the war illegal and a violation of the ].<ref name="Tucker2015">{{cite book |first=Spencer C. |last=Tucker |title=U.S. Conflicts in the 21st Century: Afghanistan War, Iraq War, and the War on Terror [3 volumes]: Afghanistan War, Iraq War, and the War on Terror |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=d8EnCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA83|date=14 December 2015 |publisher=] |isbn=978-1-4408-3879-8 |page=83 |access-date=7 June 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161215101037/https://books.google.com/books?id=d8EnCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA83 |archive-date=15 December 2016 |url-status=live |via=]}}</ref>{{sfn|McClintock|2010|p=150}} The Iraq War was deeply unpopular in most western countries, with Western governments divided in their support<ref name="Bennhold">{{cite web|last=Bennhold |first=Katrin |url=http://www.iht.com/articles/2004/08/28/sochi_ed3_.php |title=Unlikely alliance built on opposition to Iraq war now raises questions |work=International Herald Tribune |date=28 August 2004 |access-date=13 April 2010 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081207073550/http://www.iht.com/articles/2004/08/28/sochi_ed3_.php |archive-date=7 December 2008}}</ref> and under pressure from ].<ref>{{cite news |last1=Fishwick |first1=Carmen |title='We were ignored': anti-war protesters remember the Iraq war marches |url=https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/jul/08/we-were-ignored-anti-war-protestors-remember-the-iraq-war-marches |access-date=10 October 2017 |work=] |date=8 July 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171011022219/https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/jul/08/we-were-ignored-anti-war-protestors-remember-the-iraq-war-marches |archive-date=11 October 2017 |url-status=live}}</ref> The decisions that led up to the Iraq war and its subsequent conduct were the subject of the ].<ref>{{cite news |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |title=Chilcot report: key points from the Iraq inquiry |url=https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/jul/06/iraq-inquiry-key-points-from-the-chilcot-report |access-date=10 October 2017 |work=] |date=6 July 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171011022052/https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/jul/06/iraq-inquiry-key-points-from-the-chilcot-report |archive-date=11 October 2017 |url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
In the same year as Callaghan became leader, the party in ] suffered the breakaway of two MPs into the ] (SLP). Whilst ultimately the SLP proved no real threat to the Labour Party's strong Scottish electoral base it did show that the issue of Scottish ] was becoming increasingly contentious, especially after the discovery of ]. | |||
], Prime Minister (2007–2010)]]In the ], Labour was re-elected for a third term, but with a reduced majority of 66 and popular vote of only 35.2%. Blair announced in September 2006 that he would step down as leader within the year, though he had been under pressure to quit earlier than May 2007 in order to get a new leader in place before the ] which were expected to be disastrous for Labour.<ref name="I will quit within a year – Blair">{{Cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/5322094.stm |title=I will quit within a year – Blair |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061117032828/http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/5322094.stm |archive-date=17 November 2006 |work=] |date=7 September 2007}}</ref> In the event, the party did lose power in Scotland to a minority ] government at the ] and, shortly after this, Blair resigned as Prime Minister and was replaced by the ], ].<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2007/may/04/scotland.devolution |title=SNP wins historic victory |author=Patrick Wintour |work=The Guardian |date=4 May 2007 |access-date=16 June 2023 |archive-date=23 March 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170323055546/https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2007/may/04/scotland.devolution |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6243558.stm |title=Blair resigns as prime minister |publisher=BBC News |date=27 June 2007 |access-date=16 June 2023 |archive-date=13 September 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170913084307/http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6243558.stm |url-status=live }}</ref> Brown coordinated the UK's response to the ].<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/business-13032013 |title=Gordon Brown admits 'big mistake' over banking crisis |publisher=BBC News |date=11 April 2011 |access-date=16 June 2023 |archive-date=16 June 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230616145625/https://www.bbc.com/news/business-13032013 |url-status=live }}</ref> Membership of the party also reached a low falling to 156,205 by the end of 2009: over 40 per cent of the 405,000 peak reached in 1997 and thought to be the lowest total since the party was founded.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/2475301/Labour-membership-falls-to-historic-low.html |location=London |work=] |first1=James |last1=Kirkup |first2=Rosa |last2=Prince |title=Labour Party membership falls to lowest level since it was founded in 1900 |date=30 July 2008 |access-date=2 April 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180417044145/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/2475301/Labour-membership-falls-to-historic-low.html |archive-date=17 April 2018 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="parliament.uk">{{Cite web |url=http://www.parliament.uk/commons/lib/research/briefings/snsg-05125.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130121000000/http://www.parliament.uk/commons/lib/research/briefings/snsg-05125.pdf |url-status=dead |title=John Marshall: Membership of UK political parties; House of Commons, SN/SG/5125; 2009, page 9 |archive-date=21 January 2013}}</ref> | |||
Ultimately the Labour government of 1974-79 fell victim to a small majority eroded by by-election losses, economic problems, industrial unrest and the political difficulties of Scottish and Welsh devolution, although an arrangement negotiated in 1977 with the Liberals known as the ] and a succession of deals with nationalist parties did help to prolong the government's life. | |||
In the ] on 6 May that year, Labour with 29.0% of the vote won the second largest number of seats (258).<ref>{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/election2010/results/ |title=Election 2010 results |publisher=BBC News |access-date=16 June 2023 |archive-date=14 April 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100414102452/http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/election2010/results/ |url-status=live }}</ref> The Conservatives with 36.5% of the vote won the largest number of seats (307), but ], meaning that Labour could still remain in power if they managed to form a coalition with at least one smaller party.<ref name="guardian.co.uk">{{Cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2010/may/07/uk-election-results-data-candidates-seats |title=UK election results: data for every candidate in every seat |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170328091628/https://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2010/may/07/uk-election-results-data-candidates-seats |archive-date=28 March 2017 |work=] |location=London |date=7 May 2010}}</ref> However, the Labour Party would have had to form a coalition with more than one other smaller party to gain an overall majority; anything less would result in a minority government.<ref name="Wintour">{{cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/wintour-and-watt/2010/may/07/gordon-brown-rainbow-coalition |title=General election 2010: Can Gordon Brown put together a rainbow coalition? |date=7 May 2010 |work=] |location=London |first=Patrick |last=Wintour |access-date=15 December 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170328094703/https://www.theguardian.com/politics/wintour-and-watt/2010/may/07/gordon-brown-rainbow-coalition |archive-date=28 March 2017 |url-status=live}}</ref> On 10 May 2010, after talks to form a coalition with the ] broke down, Brown announced his intention to stand down as Leader before the Labour Party Conference but a day later resigned as both Prime Minister and party leader.<ref name="The Independent">{{cite news |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/gordon-brown-to-resign-as-labour-leader-1970273.html |title=Gordon Brown to resign as Labour leader |date=10 May 2010 |work=] |location=London |first1=Trevor |last1=Mason |first2=Jon |last2=Smith |access-date=2 September 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100513014237/http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/gordon-brown-to-resign-as-labour-leader-1970273.html |archive-date=13 May 2010 |url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
In 1979, the country faced the disastrous "]" that reflected badly upon public opinion of the government's ability to run the country, and in the ], Labour suffered electoral defeat to the ] led by ]. The numbers voting Labour hardly changed between February 1974 and 1979, but in 1979 the Conservative Party achieved big increases in support in the Midlands and South of England, mainly from the ailing Liberals, and benefited from a surge in turnout. | |||
=== Opposition (2010–2024) === | |||
===The Thatcher years=== | |||
{{see also|Labour Party leadership of Ed Miliband|Labour Party leadership of Jeremy Corbyn}} | |||
The aftermath of the 1979 election defeat saw a period of bitter internal rivalry in the Labour Party which had become increasingly divided between the ever more dominant left wingers under ] and ] (whose supporters dominated the party organisation at the grassroots level), and the right under ]. | |||
{{further|Shadow Cabinet of Ed Miliband|Shadow Cabinet of Jeremy Corbyn}} | |||
], Leader of the Opposition (2010–2015)]] | |||
] won the subsequent ].<ref name="Harman made acting Labour leader">{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/election_2010/8676333.stm |work=] |title=Harman made acting Labour leader |date=11 May 2010 |access-date=11 May 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170902190645/http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/election_2010/8676333.stm |archive-date=2 September 2017 |url-status=live}}</ref> Miliband emphasised "responsible capitalism" and greater ] to rebalance the economy away from ].<ref name="Miliband">{{cite web |last=Miliband |first=Ed |author-link=Ed Miliband |title=Building a responsible capitalism |work=Juncture (IPPR) |date=25 May 2012 |url=http://www.ippr.org/junctures/166/9200/building-a-responsible-capitalism |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120526093233/http://www.ippr.org/junctures/166/9200/building-a-responsible-capitalism |url-status=dead |archive-date=26 May 2012 |access-date=5 June 2012}}</ref> He advocated for more regulation of banks and energy companies<ref name="New Statesman">{{Cite news |title=Ed Miliband's Banking Reform Speech: The Full Details |url=http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2014/01/ed-milibands-banking-reform-speech-full-details |work=] |access-date=5 October 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150721052136/http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2014/01/ed-milibands-banking-reform-speech-full-details |archive-date=21 July 2015 |url-status=live}}</ref> and often addressed the need to challenge vested interests<ref>{{cite news |title=Ed Miliband: Surcharge culture is fleecing customers |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-16624805 |access-date=5 June 2012 |work=] |date=19 January 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120122003700/http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-16624805 |archive-date=22 January 2012 |url-status=live}}</ref> and increase inclusivity in British society.<ref name="The Labour Party">{{cite web |title=Ed Miliband speech on Social Mobility to the Sutton Trust|url=http://www.labour.org.uk/ed-miliband-speech-on-social-mobility-to-the-sutton-trust,2012-05-21 |publisher=The Labour Party |access-date=5 June 2012 |date=21 May 2012 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120524060329/http://www.labour.org.uk/ed-miliband-speech-on-social-mobility-to-the-sutton-trust,2012-05-21 |archive-date=24 May 2012}}</ref> He adopted the "]" branding in 2012. The ] voted to abolish ] in 2011,<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2011/jul/06/labour-abolish-shadow-cabinet-elections |title=Labour MPs vote to abolish shadow cabinet elections |date=6 July 2011 |access-date=26 July 2011 |work=] |last=Neild |first=Barry |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151003224028/http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2011/jul/06/labour-abolish-shadow-cabinet-elections |archive-date=3 October 2015 |url-status=live}}</ref> ratified by the National Executive Committee and Party Conference. Henceforth the leader of the party chose the ] members.<ref name="bbc-20110926">{{cite news |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-15056108 |title=John Prescott calls for Labour shadow cabinet reshuffle |work=] |date=26 September 2011 |access-date=31 October 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170906190641/http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-15056108 |archive-date=6 September 2017 |url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
In March 2014, the party reformed internal election procedures, including replacing the ] system with "]". Mass membership was encouraged by creating a class of "registered supporters" as an alternative to full membership. ] members would also have to explicitly opt in rather than opt out of paying a political levy to the party.<ref name=independent-20140228>{{cite news |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/tony-blair-backs-ed-milibands-internal-labour-reforms-9161291.html |title=Tony Blair backs Ed Miliband's internal Labour reforms |author=Andrew Grice |newspaper=] |location=London |date=28 February 2014 |access-date=26 July 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150822220516/http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/tony-blair-backs-ed-milibands-internal-labour-reforms-9161291.html |archive-date=22 August 2015 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref name=guardian-20140301>{{cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/blog/2014/mar/01/labour-votes-on-membershipunion-reforms-at-special-conference-politics-live-blog |title=Miliband wins vote on Labour party reforms with overwhelming majority |author=Andrew Sparrow |newspaper=] |date=1 March 2014 |access-date=24 August 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150923120123/http://www.theguardian.com/politics/blog/2014/mar/01/labour-votes-on-membershipunion-reforms-at-special-conference-politics-live-blog |archive-date=23 September 2015 |url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
The Thatcher government was determined not to be deflected from its agenda as the Heath government had been. A ] budget in 1980 led to substantial cuts in welfare spending and an initial short-term sharp rise in unemployment. The Conservatives reduced or eliminated state assistance for struggling private industries, leading to large redundancies in many regions of the country, notably in Labour's heartlands. However, Conservative legislation extending the right for residents to buy council houses from the state proved very attractive to many Labour voters. (Labour had previously suggested this idea in their 1970 election manifesto, but had never acted on it.) | |||
In September 2014, Labour outlined plans to cut the government's ] deficit and balance the budget by 2020, excluding investment. The party carried these plans into the ],<ref>{{cite news |title=Is Osborne right that a smaller state means a richer UK? |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-29409022 |work=] |access-date=5 October 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141002040634/http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-29409022 |archive-date=2 October 2014 |url-status=live}}</ref> which Labour lost. Its representation fell to 232 seats in the House of Commons.<ref name="How many seats did Labour win">{{cite news |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/generalelection/how-many-seats-did-labour-win-10233557.html |work=] |location=London |title=How many seats did Labour win?|date=8 May 2015 |access-date=8 May 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150510003244/http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/generalelection/how-many-seats-did-labour-win-10233557.html |archive-date=10 May 2015 |url-status=live}}</ref> The party lost 40 of its 41 seats in Scotland to the ].<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/SNP/11586534/scottish-election-results-2015-live.html |work=] |location=London |title=Scotland election 2015 results: SNP landslide amid almost total Labour wipeout – as it happened |date=8 May 2015 |access-date=8 May 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150508215633/http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/SNP/11586534/scottish-election-results-2015-live.html |archive-date=8 May 2015 |url-status=live}}</ref>], Leader of the Opposition (2015–2020)]] | |||
The election of ] (CND) veteran Michael Foot to the leadership disturbed many Atlanticists in the Party. Other changes increased their concern; the constituencies were given the ability to easily deselect sitting MPs, and a new voting system in leadership elections was introduced that gave party activists and affiliated trade unions a vote in different parts of an electoral college. It led to the decision by the ] (former Labour cabinet ministers) on ], ], to issue the 'Limehouse Declaration', and to form the ]. The departure of even more members from the centre and right further swung the party to the left, but not quite enough to allow Tony Benn to be elected as Deputy Leader when he challenged for the job at the September 1981 party conference. | |||
After the 2015 general election, Miliband resigned as party leader and Harriet Harman again became interim leader.<ref name="edresigns">{{cite news |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/health-32633388 |work=] |title=Labour election results: Ed Miliband resigns as leader |date=8 May 2015 |access-date=8 May 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150508052003/http://www.bbc.com/news/health-32633388 |archive-date=8 May 2015 |url-status=live}}</ref> Labour held a ] in which ], then a member of the ],<ref name="Mason">{{cite news |last=Mason |first=Rowena |title=Labour leadership: Jeremy Corbyn elected with huge mandate |url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/sep/12/jeremy-corbyn-wins-labour-party-leadership-election |access-date=12 September 2015 |work=] |location=London |date=12 September 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150917033507/http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/sep/12/jeremy-corbyn-wins-labour-party-leadership-election |archive-date=17 September 2015 |url-status=live}}</ref> was considered a fringe candidate when the contest began, receiving nominations from just 36 MPs, one more than the minimum required to stand, and the support of just 16 MPs.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Eaton |first1=George |title=The epic challenges facing Jeremy Corbyn as Labour leader |url=http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/uk/2015/09/epic-challenges-facing-jeremy-corbyn-labour-leader |access-date=20 September 2015 |work=] |date=12 September 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150923085835/http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/uk/2015/09/epic-challenges-facing-jeremy-corbyn-labour-leader |archive-date=23 September 2015 |url-status=live}}</ref> The Labour Party saw a flood of membership applications during the leadership election, with most of the new members thought to be Corbyn supporters.<ref name=bbc-20150812>{{cite news |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-33892407 |title=Labour leadership: Huge increase in party's electorate |publisher=] |date=12 August 2015 |access-date=15 September 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150929072843/http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-33892407 |archive-date=29 September 2015 |url-status=live}}</ref> Corbyn was elected leader with 60% of the vote. Membership continued to climb after his victory;<ref name="ibtimes">{{cite news |url=http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/jeremy-corbyn-membership-labour-party-has-doubled-since-2015-general-election-1523171 |title=Jeremy Corbyn: Membership of Labour party has doubled since 2015 general election |work=International Business Times |date=8 October 2015 |access-date=11 October 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161205131359/http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/jeremy-corbyn-membership-labour-party-has-doubled-since-2015-general-election-1523171 |archive-date=5 December 2016 |url-status=live}}</ref> one year later it had grown to more than 500,000, making it the largest political party in Western Europe.<ref name="nytimes">{{cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/25/world/europe/jeremy-corbyn-labour-party-leader.html?_r=0 |title=Jeremy Corbyn Is Re-elected as Leader of Britain's Labour Party |work=] |date=24 September 2016 |access-date=11 October 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170904012747/https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/25/world/europe/jeremy-corbyn-labour-party-leader.html?_r=0 |archive-date=4 September 2017 |url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
] | |||
Led by an increasingly unpopular Michael Foot, the party went into the ] with a manifesto dominated by the politics of the party's far-left wing. The manifesto contained pledges for abolition of the ], unilateral nuclear disarmament, withdrawal from the ], withdrawal from ] and the most radical and extensive ] agenda that Labour had ever stood on including nationalisation of industry and banks. The Bennites were in the ascendency and there was very little that moderates could do to resist or moderate the manifesto, many also hoped that a landslide defeat would discredit Michael Foot and the hard left of the party. Labour MP and former minister ] famously described the 1983 election manifesto as "the longest suicide note in history". The Conservatives considered the 1983 Labour manifesto as being so unpopular that they actually printed a number of copies of it to distribute it for free and indeed Labour was possibly only saved from far more substantial collapse by tactical voting by Alliance supporters and Conservative supporters worried by the effects of the possible scale of the Conservative majority in removing checks on the Government, notably Conservative cabinet minister ] statements during the campaign that big majorities caused bad government. | |||
Tensions soon developed in the parliamentary party over Corbyn's leadership, particularly after the ].<ref name="guardian-20160627">{{cite news |last1=Syal |first1=Rajeev |last2=Perraudin |first2=Frances |last3=Slawson |first3=Nicola |date=27 June 2016 |title=Shadow cabinet resignations: who has gone and who is staying |newspaper=] |url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jun/26/labour-shadow-cabinet-resignations-jeremy-corbyn-who-has-gone |url-status=live |access-date=8 July 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160722213447/http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jun/26/labour-shadow-cabinet-resignations-jeremy-corbyn-who-has-gone |archive-date=22 July 2016}}</ref> Many in the party were angered that Corbyn did not campaign strongly against Brexit;<ref>{{Cite news |last1=Asthana |first1=Anushka |last2=Syal |first2=Rajeev |last3=Elgot |first3=Jessica |date=28 June 2016 |title=Labour MPs prepare for leadership contest after Corbyn loses confidence vote |language=en-GB |work=The Guardian |url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jun/28/jeremy-corbyn-loses-labour-mps-confidence-vote |access-date=28 July 2023 |issn=0261-3077 |archive-date=28 June 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160628171010/http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jun/28/jeremy-corbyn-loses-labour-mps-confidence-vote |url-status=live }}</ref> he had been only a "lukewarm" supporter of remaining in the European Union and refused to join ] in campaigning for the ].<ref>{{Cite web |last=McTague |first=Tom |date=25 June 2016 |title=How David Cameron blew it |url=https://www.politico.eu/article/how-david-cameron-lost-brexit-eu-referendum-prime-minister-campaign-remain-boris-craig-oliver-jim-messina-obama/ |access-date=28 July 2023 |website=Politico |language=en |archive-date=19 November 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201119202218/https://www.politico.eu/article/how-david-cameron-lost-brexit-eu-referendum-prime-minister-campaign-remain-boris-craig-oliver-jim-messina-obama/ |url-status=live }}</ref> 21 members of the ] resigned after the referendum.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Elgot |first=Jessica |date=27 June 2016 |title=Labour crisis: the most powerful lines from shadow cabinet resignations |language=en-GB |work=The Guardian |url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jun/27/most-powerful-lines-labour-shadow-cabinet-resignations |access-date=28 July 2023 |issn=0261-3077}}</ref> Corbyn lost a ] among Labour MPs by 172–40,<ref name="Elgot">{{cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jun/28/jeremy-corbyn-loses-labour-mps-confidence-vote |title=Jeremy Corbyn suffers heavy loss in Labour MPs confidence vote |newspaper=] |last1=Asthana |first1=Anushka |last2=Elgot |first2=Jessica |last3=Syal |first3=Rajeev |date=28 June 2016 |access-date=28 June 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160628171010/http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jun/28/jeremy-corbyn-loses-labour-mps-confidence-vote |archive-date=28 June 2016 |url-status=live}}</ref> triggering a ], which he won decisively with 62% support among Labour party members.<ref name="BBC240916">{{cite news |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-37461219 |title=Labour leadership: Jeremy Corbyn defeats Owen Smith |work=] |date=24 September 2016 |access-date=24 September 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160924105517/http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-37461219 |archive-date=24 September 2016 |url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
Much of the press attacked both the Labour party's manifesto and its style of campaigning, which tended to rely upon public meetings and canvassing rather than media (although given that Michael Foot was so unpopular a low profile probably lessened Labour's collapse). By contrast, the Conservatives ran a professional campaign which played on the voters' fears of a repeat of the Winter of Discontent. To add to this, the Thatcher government's popularity rose sharply on a wave of patriotic feeling following victory in the ]. | |||
In April 2017, Prime Minister Theresa May called a ] for June 2017.<ref name=":0">{{cite news |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/uk-39628713 |title=Theresa May seeks general election |date=18 April 2017 |work=] |access-date=18 April 2017 |language=en-GB |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170815231711/http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/uk-39628713 |archive-date=15 August 2017 |url-status=live}}</ref> Corbyn resisted pressure from within the Labour Party to call for a referendum on the eventual Brexit deal, instead focusing on healthcare, education and ending austerity.<ref name="nyt230918">{{cite news |last=Castle |first=Stephen |date=23 September 2018 |title=Jeremy Corbyn, at Labour Party Conference, Faces Pressure on New Brexit Vote |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/23/world/europe/uk-labour-party.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191206134404/https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/23/world/europe/uk-labour-party.html |archive-date=6 December 2019 |work=]}}</ref> Although Labour started the campaign as far as 20 points behind, it defied expectations by gaining 40% of the vote, its greatest share since ] and the biggest increase in vote share in a single general election since ].<ref name="londoneconomic">{{cite news |last=Griffin |first=Andrew |date=9 June 2017 |title=Corbyn gives Labour biggest vote share increase since 1945 |publisher=The London Economic |url=http://www.thelondoneconomic.com/news/corbyn-gives-labour-biggest-vote-share-increase-since-1945/09/06/ |url-status=live |access-date=10 June 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170611180523/http://www.thelondoneconomic.com/news/corbyn-gives-labour-biggest-vote-share-increase-since-1945/09/06/ |archive-date=11 June 2017}}</ref> The party gained a net 30 seats with the Conservatives losing their overall majority.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jun/11/labour-can-win-majority-if-it-pushes-for-new-general-election-within-two-years |title=Labour can win majority if it pushes for new general election within two years |last=Travis |first=Alan |date=11 June 2017 |work=] |access-date=24 July 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170724002649/https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jun/11/labour-can-win-majority-if-it-pushes-for-new-general-election-within-two-years |archive-date=24 July 2017 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.ft.com/content/60d5a46e-3575-11e7-bce4-9023f8c0fd2e |title=The UK Conservative party's deal with DUP is the easy part |first=James |last=Blitz |website=Financial Times |date=26 June 2017 |access-date=21 June 2024 |archive-date=21 June 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240621142644/https://www.ft.com/content/60d5a46e-3575-11e7-bce4-9023f8c0fd2e |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
After a landslide defeat at the 1983 election, Michael Foot immediately resigned and was replaced by ], initially considered a firebrand left-winger, he proved to be more pragmatic than Foot and progressively moved the party to the centre; banning left-wing groups such as the ] and reversing party policy on EEC membership and withdrawal from NATO, bringing in ] as Director of Communications to modernise the party's image, and embarking on a policy review which reported back in 1985. | |||
From 2016, the Labour Party faced criticism for failing to deal with ]. Criticism was also levelled at Corbyn.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-43523445 |title=Jeremy Corbyn regrets comments about 'anti-Semitic' mural |date=23 March 2018 |work=] |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191213073631/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-43523445 |archive-date=13 December 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.politicshome.com/news/uk/political-parties/labour-party/jeremy-corbyn/news/97795/jeremy-corbyn-defends-%E2%80%98zionists-and |title=Jeremy Corbyn defends 'Zionists and English irony' comments |last=Coulter |first=Martin |date=25 August 2019 |website=PoliticsHome |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190622232103/https://www.politicshome.com/news/uk/political-parties/labour-party/jeremy-corbyn/news/97795/jeremy-corbyn-defends-%E2%80%98zionists-and |archive-date=22 June 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.theguardian.com/news/2019/may/01/jeremy-corbyn-rejects-antisemitism-claim-over-book-foreword |title=Jewish leaders demand explanation over Corbyn book foreword |last1=Stewart |first1=Heather |first2=Sarah |last2=Marsh |date=1 May 2019 |website=] |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191018063020/https://www.theguardian.com/news/2019/may/01/jeremy-corbyn-rejects-antisemitism-claim-over-book-foreword |archive-date=18 October 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-45027582 |title=Jeremy Corbyn apologises over 2010 Holocaust event |date=1 August 2018 |website=] |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191219121209/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-45027582 |archive-date=19 December 2019}}</ref> The ] cleared the party of widespread antisemitism, but identified an "occasionally toxic atmosphere".<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-36672022 |title=Chakrabarti inquiry: Labour not overrun by anti-Semitism |website=BBC News |date=30 June 2016 |access-date=14 January 2024 |archive-date=30 June 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160630121456/http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-36672022 |url-status=live }}</ref> High-profile party members, including ],<ref>{{Cite news |last=Crerar |first=Pippa |last2= |first2= |date=21 May 2018 |title=Ken Livingstone quits Labour after antisemitism claims |work=The Guardian |url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/may/21/ken-livingstone-quits-labour-after-antisemitism-claims |access-date=29 July 2023 |issn=0261-3077 |archive-date=30 July 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230730212322/https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/may/21/ken-livingstone-quits-labour-after-antisemitism-claims |url-status=live }}</ref> ]<ref name="q481">{{cite web | title=Peter Willsman: Labour suspends NEC member over anti-Semitism remarks | website=BBC News | date=31 May 2019 | url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-48472977 | access-date=23 September 2024}}</ref> and ],<ref>{{Cite web |last=Speare-Cole |first=Rebecca |date=7 November 2019 |title=Chris Williamson to stand as independent MP after Labour ban |url=https://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/general-election-news-latest-chris-williamson-to-stand-as-independent-mp-after-labour-bans-him-from-party-a4280721.html |access-date=29 July 2023 |website=Evening Standard |archive-date=29 July 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230729093505/https://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/general-election-news-latest-chris-williamson-to-stand-as-independent-mp-after-labour-bans-him-from-party-a4280721.html |url-status=live }}</ref> left the party or were suspended over antisemitism-related incidents. In 2018, internal divisions emerged over adopting the IHRA ], with those opposed arguing the definition limits ] including criticism of the state of ]. 68 ] criticised the leadership for its stance.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/jul/16/labour-party-must-listen-to-the-jewish-community-on-defining-antisemitism|title=Labour party must listen to the Jewish community on defining antisemitism|date=16 July 2018|website=The Guardian|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191017174506/https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/jul/16/labour-party-must-listen-to-the-jewish-community-on-defining-antisemitism|archive-date=17 October 2019}}</ref> The issue was cited by a number of Labour MPs who left the party to create ], a new political party made up of ex-Conservative and ex-Labour MPs.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.itv.com/news/granada/2019-02-18/luciana-berger-quits-the-labour-party-over-institutional-anti-semitism/|title=Luciana Berger quits the Labour party over 'institutional anti-semitism'|date=18 February 2019|website=ITV|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191203192558/https://www.itv.com/news/granada/2019-02-18/luciana-berger-quits-the-labour-party-over-institutional-anti-semitism/|archive-date=3 December 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/ephraim-mirvis-what-will-become-of-jews-in-britain-if-labour-forms-the-next-government-ghpsdbljk|title=What will become of Jews in Britain if Labour forms the next government?|last=Mirvis|first=Ephraim|date=25 November 2019|website=The Times|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191128024726/https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/ephraim-mirvis-what-will-become-of-jews-in-britain-if-labour-forms-the-next-government-ghpsdbljk|archive-date=28 November 2019}}</ref> | |||
At the ], the party was again defeated in a landslide, but had at least re-established itself as the clear challengers to the Conservatives and gained 20 seats reducing the Conservative majority to 102 from 143 in 1983, despite a sharp rise in turnout. Challenged for the leadership by ] in 1988, Neil Kinnock easily retained the leadership claiming a mandate for his reforms of the party. Re-organisation resulted in the dissolution of the ], which was thought to be harbouring ] ] groups. It also resulted in a more centralised communication structure, enabling a greater degree of flexibility for the leadership to determine policy, react to events, and direct resources. | |||
In the ], Labour campaigned on a manifesto widely considered the most radical in decades, more closely resembling Labour's politics of the 1970s than subsequent decades. These included plans to nationalise the country's biggest energy firms, the National Grid, the water industry, Royal Mail, the railways and the broadband arm of ].<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/commentisfree/2016/aug/15/the-parallels-between-jeremy-corbyn-and-michael-foot-are-almost-all-false- |title=The parallels between Jeremy Corbyn and Michael Foot are almost all false |last=Mason |first=Paul |work=] |date=15 August 2016 |access-date=20 December 2019 |issn=0261-3077 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190403204612/https://www.theguardian.com/politics/commentisfree/2016/aug/15/the-parallels-between-jeremy-corbyn-and-michael-foot-are-almost-all-false |archive-date=3 April 2019 |url-status=live}}</ref> The election saw Labour win its lowest number of seats since 1935.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Collier |first=Ian |date=14 December 2019|title=General election: Jeremy Corbyn to quit as Labour leader after disastrous night |url=https://news.sky.com/story/general-election-jeremy-corbyn-to-stand-down-as-labour-leader-after-disastrous-night-11885159 |access-date=19 December 2020 |work=] |archive-date=6 January 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210106141000/https://news.sky.com/story/general-election-jeremy-corbyn-to-stand-down-as-labour-leader-after-disastrous-night-11885159 |url-status=live}}</ref> Following Labour's defeat in the ] Corbyn announced that he would stand down as leader.<ref>{{cite news |date=13 December 2019 |title=Jeremy Corbyn: 'I will not lead Labour at next election' |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2019-50766114 |access-date=17 September 2023 |publisher=BBC News |archive-date=14 December 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191214155812/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2019-50766114 |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
During this time the Labour Party emphasised the abandonment of its links to high taxation and old-style nationalisation, which aimed to show that the party was moving away from the left of the political spectrum and towards the centre. It also became actively pro-European, supporting further moves to ]. | |||
In 2020, a report by the ] found the party responsible for three ] breaches, including harassment and political interference in antisemitism complaints, but did not directly implicate Corbyn.<ref name="auto">{{Cite news |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-54731222 |title=What does the Labour anti-Semitism report say? |work=] |date=29 October 2020 |access-date=7 December 2020 |archive-date=20 November 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201120235700/https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-54731222 |url-status=live}}</ref> In response, Corbyn said “One antisemite is one too many, but the scale of the problem was also dramatically overstated for political reasons by our opponents inside and outside the party, as well as by much of the media.”<ref>{{Cite web |title=Jeremy Corbyn rejects overall findings of EHRC report on antisemitism in Labour {{!}} Labour {{!}} The Guardian |url=https://amp.theguardian.com/politics/2020/oct/29/jeremy-corbyn-rejects-findings-of-report-on-antisemitism-in-labour |access-date=2024-12-07 |website=amp.theguardian.com}}</ref> The ] concluded allegations of antisemitism were weaponised by opponents of Corbyn and that hostility towards Corbyn inside the party from his opponents contributed to the party’s ineffective handling of antisemitism complaints and undermined the party’s leader and election campaigns.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2022-07-19 |title=Anti-Semitism used as factional weapon within Labour, says report |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-62226042.amp |access-date=2024-12-07 |website=BBC News |language=en-gb}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Stewart |first=Heather |last2=Elgot |first2=Jessica |date=2022-07-19 |title=Key takeaways from the Forde report on Labour factionalism |url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/jul/19/key-takeaways-forde-report-labour-factionalism |access-date=2024-12-07 |work=The Guardian |language=en-GB |issn=0261-3077}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Forde |first=Martin |title=The Forde Report |url=https://labour.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/The-Forde-Report.pdf |journal=The Forde Report}}</ref> | |||
=== Return to government (2024–present) === | |||
{{Main|Premiership of Keir Starmer|Starmer ministry}}], Prime Minister (2024–present)]] | |||
On 4 April 2020, ] was elected as Leader of the Labour Party amidst the ].<ref>{{Cite news |date=4 April 2020 |title=Keir Starmer elected as new Labour leader |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-52164589 |url-status=live |access-date=4 April 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200425080229/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-52164589 |archive-date=25 April 2020}}</ref> During ], Starmer repositioned the party from the ] toward the ], and emphasised the importance of eliminating ]. Starmer led Labour to victory in the local elections in ] and ]. In 2023, Starmer set out five missions for ], targeting issues such as economic growth, health, clean energy, crime and education.<ref>{{Cite news |last1=Mason |first1=Chris |last2=Whannel |first2=Kate |date=23 February 2023 |title=Keir Starmer unveils Labour's five missions for the country |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-64739371 |access-date=5 July 2024 |work=] |archive-date=7 July 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240707072442/https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-64739371 |url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
During the ], Labour maintained a strong poll lead, with ] focusing on economic growth, planning system reform, infrastructure, clean energy, healthcare, education, childcare, constitutional reform, and strengthening workers' rights.<ref>{{Cite web |date=23 May 2024 |title=Labour manifesto 2024: Find out how Labour will get Britain's future back |url=https://labour.org.uk/updates/stories/labour-manifesto-2024-sign-up/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240613141625/https://labour.org.uk/updates/stories/labour-manifesto-2024-sign-up/ |archive-date=13 June 2024 |access-date=12 June 2024 |website=The Labour Party}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |title=Labour Party Manifesto 2024 |url=https://labour.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Labour-Party-manifesto-2024.pdf |journal=Labour Party Manifesto 2024 |access-date=13 June 2024 |archive-date=14 June 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240614003615/https://labour.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Labour-Party-manifesto-2024.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> It pledged a new ] to achieve ] by 2030, a "Green Prosperity Plan", reducing patient waiting times and "rebuilding the NHS", reforming public services, and public ownership of the ] and local bus services.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Reid |first=Jenni |date=13 June 2024 |title=Britain's Labour Party pledges 'wealth creation' as it targets landslide election victory |url=https://www.cnbc.com/2024/06/13/uk-general-election-2024-labour-publishes-manifesto-.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240613173116/https://www.cnbc.com/2024/06/13/uk-general-election-2024-labour-publishes-manifesto-.html |archive-date=13 June 2024 |access-date=13 June 2024 |website=CNBC |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=13 June 2024 |title=Starmer launches Labour's pro-business, pro-worker manifesto with £7.35bn of new taxes |url=https://nz.news.yahoo.com/starmer-hopes-labour-pro-business-103304717.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240613173115/https://nz.news.yahoo.com/starmer-hopes-labour-pro-business-103304717.html |archive-date=13 June 2024 |access-date=13 June 2024 |website=Yahoo News}}</ref> The manifesto also pledged to give votes to 16 year olds, reform the ], and to tax private schools, with money generated going into improving state education.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Mason |first=Rowena |date=13 June 2024 |title=Change and growth: five key takeaways from the Labour manifesto launch |url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/article/2024/jun/13/change-and-growth-five-key-takeaways-from-the-labour-manifesto-launch |access-date=13 June 2024 |work=The Guardian |issn=0261-3077}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last1=Gibbons |first1=Amy |last2=Sigsworth |first2=Tim |date=16 May 2024 |title=Labour Party manifesto 2024: Keir Starmer's election promises |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/0/labour-party-pledges-manifesto-general-election-voters/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240706003421/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2024/07/05/labour-party-pledges-manifesto-general-election-voters/ |archive-date=6 July 2024 |access-date=13 June 2024 |work=The Telegraph |issn=0307-1235}}</ref> | |||
== John Major and a fourth successive defeat== | |||
By the time of the ], the party had reformed to such an extent that it was perceived as a credible government-in-waiting. Most opinion polls showed the party to have a slight lead over the Conservatives, although rarely sufficient for a majority. However, the party ended up 8% behind the Conservatives in the popular vote in one of the biggest surprises in British electoral history. Although Labour's support was comparable to the February and October 1974 and May 1979 General Elections, the overall turnout was much larger. | |||
Starmer led Labour to a landslide victory with a majority of 174, with a popular vote share of 33.7%,<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c4nglegege1o |title=General election 2024 in maps and charts |website=BBC News |date=6 July 2024 |access-date=8 July 2024 |archive-date=8 July 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240708035327/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c4nglegege1o |url-status=live }}</ref> ending fourteen years of Conservative government with Labour becoming the largest party in the ].<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c4nglegege1o |title=General election 2024 in maps and charts |website=BBC News |date=6 July 2024 |access-date=8 July 2024 |archive-date=8 July 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240708035327/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c4nglegege1o |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name=":112">{{Cite web |last=Brown |first=Faye |date=5 July 2024 |title='Change begins now', Starmer says - as Labour win historic landslide |url=https://news.sky.com/story/the-labour-party-has-won-this-general-election-sunak-concedes-defeat-13162921 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240705091108/https://news.sky.com/story/the-labour-party-has-won-this-general-election-sunak-concedes-defeat-13162921 |archive-date=5 July 2024 |access-date=5 July 2024 |website=]}}</ref> He succeeded ] as prime minister on 5 July 2024, becoming the first Labour prime minister since Gordon Brown in 2010 and the first one to win a general election since Tony Blair in ].<ref name=":12">{{Cite news |last=Mason |first=Rowena |date=5 July 2024 |title=Keir Starmer promises 'stability and moderation' in first speech as PM |url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/article/2024/jul/05/keir-starmer-first-speech-prime-minister-pm-labour-downing-street |access-date=5 July 2024 |work=] |issn=0261-3077 |archive-date=7 July 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240707072441/https://www.theguardian.com/politics/article/2024/jul/05/keir-starmer-first-speech-prime-minister-pm-labour-downing-street |url-status=live }}</ref> One of Starmer's first cabinet appointments was ] as Chancellor, which made her the first woman to hold the office.<ref>{{Cite news |date=2024-07-05 |title=Rachel Reeves Goes for Growth as UK's First Female Chancellor |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-07-05/rachel-reeves-goes-for-growth-as-uk-s-first-female-chancellor |access-date=2024-07-05 |work=Bloomberg.com |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2024-07-08 |title=Rachel Reeves: First female chancellor a 'game-changer' says MP |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cnl05pyw8yjo |access-date=2024-07-09 |website=BBC News |language=en-GB |archive-date=9 July 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240709134404/https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cnl05pyw8yjo |url-status=live }}</ref> The ] outlined 39 pieces of legislation that Labour proposed, including ] to ], strengthen the rights of workers, and to give areas of England ].<ref name="Growth2">{{Cite web |date=17 July 2024 |title=Starmer pledges growth with building and rail reforms |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c903d09jwk7o |accessdate=17 July 2024 |website=BBC News |publisher=BBC |archive-date=31 August 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240831053821/https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c903d09jwk7o |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2024-07-15 |title=Key points in King's Speech at a glance |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c51y7pqy1v3o |access-date=2024-07-25 |website=BBC News |language=en-GB |archive-date=29 August 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240829120054/https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c51y7pqy1v3o |url-status=live }}</ref>{{clear}}<!--This section is meant to be just a summary. Please do not add too much detail – the "History of the Labour Party (UK)" article is intended for detailed additions--> | |||
In the party's post mortem on why it had lost, it was considered that the 'Shadow Budget' announced by ] had opened the way for Conservatives to attack the party for wanting to raise taxes. In addition, a triumphalist party rally held in ] eight days before the election, was generally considered to have backfired. Kinnock resigned after the defeat, blaming Conservative-supporting newspapers for Labour's failure and ], despite his involvement with the Shadow Budget, was elected to succeed him. | |||
== Ideology == | |||
Smith's leadership once again saw the re-emergence of tension between those on the party's left and those identified as 'modernisers', both of whom advocated radical revisions of the party's stance albeit in different ways. At the 1993 conference, Smith successfully changed the party rules and lessened the influence of the trade unions on the selection of candidates to stand for Parliament by introducing a ] system called OMOV — but only barely, after a barnstorming speech by ] which required Smith to compromise on other individual negotiations. John Smith died suddenly in May 1994 from a heart attack. | |||
{{Socialism in the UK}} | |||
Labour sits on the ] of the political spectrum.{{refn|<ref name="auto1">{{cite web |url=https://edition.cnn.com/2024/07/04/europe/uk-election-europe-populist-surge-intl/index.html |title=As Europe turns right, why has a center-left party won by a landslide in the UK? |publisher=] |first=Luke |last=McGee |date=5 July 2024 |access-date=8 July 2024 |archive-date=5 July 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240705023128/https://edition.cnn.com/2024/07/04/europe/uk-election-europe-populist-surge-intl/index.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="auto2">{{cite web |title=Europe's Center-Left Can Learn a Lot From Scholz, Sanchez and Starmer |date=20 September 2023 |url=https://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/spain-sanchez-scholz-germany/ |publisher=] |access-date=8 July 2024 |archive-date=8 July 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240708184116/https://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/spain-sanchez-scholz-germany/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="auto4"/><ref name="auto3"/>{{sfn|Budge|2008|pp=26–27|}}}} It was formed to provide political representation for the ] in Parliament. The Labour Party gained a socialist commitment with the party constitution of 1918, ] of which called for the "common ownership", or ], of the "means of production, distribution and exchange". Although about a third of British industry was taken into public ownership after the Second World War and remained so until the 1980s, the right of the party was questioning the validity of expanding on this by the late 1950s. Influenced by ]'s book '']'' (1956), the circle around party leader ] felt that the commitment was no longer necessary. An attempt to remove Clause IV from the party constitution in 1959 failed; Tony Blair and New Labour "modernisers" were successful in removing Clause IV in 1994.<ref name="historytoday.com">Martin Daunton {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150721122126/http://www.historytoday.com/martin-daunton/labour-party-and-clause-four-1918-1995 |date=21 July 2015 }}, ''History Review 1995'' (''History Today'' website)</ref><ref>Philip Gould ''The Unfinished Revolution: How New Labour Changed British Politics Forever'', London: Hachette digital edition, 2011, p.30 (originally published by Little, Brown, 1998)</ref><ref name="independent.co.uk">John Rentoul {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170908021337/https://www.independent.co.uk/news/defining-moment-as-blair-wins-backing-for-clause-iv-1611135.html |date=8 September 2017 }}, '']'', 14 March 1995.</ref> | |||
Historically influenced by ], the party favoured ] in the economy and the ] of wealth. Taxation was seen as a means to achieve a "major redistribution of wealth and income" in the October 1974 election manifesto.{{sfn|Lund|2006|p=111}} The party also desired increased rights for workers and a ], including publicly funded healthcare. From the late-1980s onwards, the party adopted ] policies,<ref name="mulholland1">{{cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2011/apr/07/labour-pro-business-ed-miliband |location=London |work=] |first=Helene |last=Mulholland |title=Labour will continue to be pro-business, says Ed Miliband |date=7 April 2011 |access-date=15 December 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170328104934/https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2011/apr/07/labour-pro-business-ed-miliband |archive-date=28 March 2017 |url-status=live}}</ref> leading many observers to describe the Labour Party as ] or the ], rather than democratic socialist.{{sfnm|1a1=Hay|1y=2002|1pp=114–115|2a1=Hopkin|2a2=Wincott|2y=2006|3a1=Jessop|3y=2004|4a1=McAnulla|4y=2006|4pp=118, 127, 133, 141|5a1=Merkel|5a2=Petring|5a3=Henkes|5a4=Egle|5y=2008|5pp=4, 25–26, 40, 66}} Other commentators go further and argue that traditional social democratic parties across Europe, including the British Labour Party, have been so deeply transformed in recent years that it is no longer possible to describe them ideologically as "social democratic",<ref name="Lavelle 2008">{{cite book |title=The Death of Social Democracy, Political Consequences for the 21st Century |last=Lavelle |first=Ashley |year=2008 |publisher=]}}</ref> and that this ideological shift has put new strains on the Labour Party's traditional relationship with the trade unions.{{sfnm|1a1=Daniels|1a2=McIlroy|1y=2009|2a1=McIlroy|2y=2011|3a1=Smith|3y=2009|4a1=Smith|4a2=Morton|4y=2006}} Within the party, differentiation was made between the social democratic and the ] wings of the party, the latter often subscribed to a radical socialist, even ], ideology.{{sfn|Crines|2011|p=161}}<ref name="What's left of the Labour left">{{cite web |title=What's left of the Labour left? |url=http://www.totalpolitics.com/print/161892/whats-left-of-the-labour-left.thtml |publisher=Total Politics |access-date=6 May 2015 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150821005801/http://www.totalpolitics.com/print/161892/whats-left-of-the-labour-left.thtml |archive-date=21 August 2015}}</ref> | |||
==New Labour== | |||
===Origins=== | |||
] | |||
"New Labour" is an alternative branding for the Labour Party dating from a conference slogan first used by the Labour Party in 1994 which was later seen in a draft ] published by the party in 1996, called ''New Labour, New Life For Britain'' and presented by Labour as being the brand of the new reformed party that had in 1995 ditched ] and reduced the Trade Union vote in the electoral college used to elect the leader and deputy leader to have equal weighting with individual other parts of the electoral college. | |||
While affirming a commitment to ],<ref name="constitution"/><ref name=hww>{{cite web |url=http://www.labour.org.uk/how_we_work |title=How we work – How the party works |publisher=Labour Party |access-date=31 May 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130606111421/http://www.labour.org.uk/how_we_work |archive-date=6 June 2013}}</ref> the new version of Clause IV no longer definitely commits the party to public ownership of industry and in its place advocates "the enterprise of the market and the rigour of competition" along with "high quality public services either owned by the public or accountable to them".<ref name="constitution"/> MPs in the ] and the ] see themselves as standard bearers for the radical socialist tradition in contrast to the democratic socialist tradition represented by organisations such as ] and the magazine '']''.<ref name="labourlist.org">{{cite web |last1=Akehurst |first1=Luke |title=Compass and Progress: A tale of two groupings |url=http://labourlist.org/2011/03/compass-and-progress-a-tale-of-two-groupings/ |website=] |access-date=6 May 2015 |date=14 March 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150706111123/http://labourlist.org/2011/03/compass-and-progress-a-tale-of-two-groupings/ |archive-date=6 July 2015 |url-status=live}}</ref> The group ], founded in 1996, represents the centrist position in the party and was opposed to the Corbyn leadership.<ref name="progress-20170302">{{cite news |url=http://www.progressonline.org.uk/2017/03/02/the-problem-is-politics-not-pr/ |title=The problem is politics, not PR |last=Angell |first=Richard |publisher=Progress Online |date=2 March 2017 |access-date=26 July 2017 |quote=few come more 'militant anti-Corbyn' than I |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170917150807/http://www.progressonline.org.uk/2017/03/02/the-problem-is-politics-not-pr/ |archive-date=17 September 2017 |url-status=dead}}</ref><ref name="progress-20170720">{{cite web |url=http://www.progressonline.org.uk/2017/07/20/what-would-jeremy-do/ |title=What would Jeremy do? |publisher=Progress Online |date=20 July 2017 |access-date=24 July 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170808155205/http://www.progressonline.org.uk/2017/07/20/what-would-jeremy-do/ |archive-date=8 August 2017 |url-status=dead}}</ref> In 2015, ] was created by ] as a grass-roots left-wing organisation following ]'s election as party leader. Rather than organising among the ], Momentum is a rank-and-file grouping with an estimated 40,000 members.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/momentum-membership-jeremy-corbyn-green-party-40000-labour-nec-jon-lansman-a8286706.html |title=Momentum: Corbyn-backing organisation now has 40,000 paying members, overtaking Green Party |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180405024730/https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/momentum-membership-jeremy-corbyn-green-party-40000-labour-nec-jon-lansman-a8286706.html |archive-date=5 April 2018 |work=] |first=Ashley |last=Cowburn |date=4 April 2018 |access-date=11 April 2018}}</ref> The party also has a ] faction, the ] society.<ref>{{Cite web |date=3 May 2009 |title=Christian Socialist Movement: Labour party affiliation |url=http://www.thecsm.org.uk/Groups/87275/Christian_Socialist_Movement/About_CSM/Labour_party_affiliation/Labour_party_affiliation.aspx |access-date=8 January 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090503012029/http://www.thecsm.org.uk/Groups/87275/Christian_Socialist_Movement/About_CSM/Labour_party_affiliation/Labour_party_affiliation.aspx |archive-date=3 May 2009}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |editor-first=Thomas |editor-last=Kurian |title=The Encyclopedia of Political Science |publisher=CQ Press |location=Washington D.C. |date=2011 |page=1555}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Routledge |first=Paul |date=22 May 1994 |title=Labour revives faith in Christian Socialism |work=] on Sunday}}</ref> | |||
] was a senior figure in this process, and exercised a great deal of authority in the party following the death of ] and the subsequent election of ] as party leader. | |||
=== Symbols === | |||
The name is primarily used by the party itself in its literature but is also sometimes used by political commentators and the wider ]; it was also the basis of a ] poster campaign of 1997, headlined "New Labour, New Danger". The rise of the name coincided with a rightwards shift of the British political spectrum; for Labour, this was a continuation of the trend that had begun under the leadership of ]. "Old Labour" is sometimes used by commentators to describe the older, more left-wing members of the party, or those with strong Trade Union connections. | |||
Labour has long been identified with red, a ] traditionally affiliated with socialism and the ]. Prior to the red flag logo, the party had used a modified version of the classic 1924 shovel, torch, and quill emblem. In 1924, a brand-conscious Labour leadership had devised a competition, inviting supporters to design a logo to replace the 'polo mint' like motif that had previously appeared in party literature. The winning entry, emblazoned with the word "Liberty" over a design incorporating a torch, shovel, and quill symbol, was popularised through its sale, in badge form, for a shilling. The party conference in 1931 passed a motion "That this conference adopts Party Colours, which should be uniform throughout the country, colours to be red and gold".<ref name="ReferenceA">"Labour Party Annual Conference Report", 1931, p. 233.</ref> During the New Labour period, the colour purple was also used, and the party has employed other colours in certain areas according to local tradition.<ref>{{Cite news |date=3 May 2015 |title=The seats where Tories weren't blue and Labour wasn't red |language=en-GB |work=] |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-32510493 |access-date=2 July 2023 |archive-date=2 July 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230702094333/https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-32510493 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Abrams |first=Fran |date=20 April 1997 |title=Election '97: Labour go from red to purple |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/election-97-labour-go-from-red-to-purple-1268462.html |access-date=2 July 2023 |work=] |language=en |archive-date=2 July 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230702094336/https://www.independent.co.uk/news/election-97-labour-go-from-red-to-purple-1268462.html |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
], originally the official flag and symbol of the Labour Party.]] | |||
], ], ] and ] are most commonly cited as the creators and architects of "New Labour". They were among the most prominent advocates of the shift in European ] during the 1990s, known as the "]". The use of "New" echoes slogans in ], particularly those of the Democratic Party, such as ] ] (which indeed Labour has used as the name for its Welfare to Work programmes since 1997), ] ] and ] ] and in Canada with the founding of the left-leaning ] in 1961. | |||
Since the party's inception, the ] has been Labour's official symbol; the flag has been associated with socialism and revolution ever since the 1789 ] and the ]. The ], a symbol of socialism and social democracy, was adopted as the party symbol in 1986 as part of a rebranding exercise and is now incorporated into the party logo.<ref name="The Telegraph">{{cite news |title=The long and the short about Labour's red rose |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/4263355/The-long-and-the-short-about-Labours-red-rose.html |access-date=31 August 2014 |work=] |location=London |date=26 June 2001 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140903182029/http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/4263355/The-long-and-the-short-about-Labours-red-rose.html |archive-date=3 September 2014 |url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
The red flag became an inspiration, which resulted in the composition of "]", the official party anthem since its inception, being sung at the end of party conferences and on various occasions such as in Parliament in February 2006 to mark the centenary of the Labour Party's founding. It still remains in use, although attempts were made to play down the role of the song during New Labour.<ref name="bbc">{{cite news |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-12759902 |work=] |first=Helen |last=Grady |title=Blue Labour: Party's radical answer to the Big Society? |date=21 March 2011 |access-date=20 June 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180915233157/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-12759902 |archive-date=15 September 2018 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="Hoggart">{{cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2007/sep/28/labourconference.politicalcolumnists |title=Red Flag rises above a dodgy future |first=Simon |last=Hoggart |author-link=Simon Hoggart |work=] |location=London |date=28 September 2007 |access-date=21 December 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131002143642/http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2007/sep/28/labourconference.politicalcolumnists |archive-date=2 October 2013 |url-status=live}}</ref> The song "]", based on a ] poem, is also traditionally sung at the end of party conferences with The Red Flag.<ref name="Telegraph.co.uk">{{cite news |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/labour/8796628/Ed-Miliband-sings-The-Red-Flag-and-Jerusalem-at-the-Labour-Party-Conference.html |title=Video: Ed Miliband sings The Red Flag and Jerusalem at the Labour Party Conference |date=29 September 2011 |work=] |location=London |access-date=2 April 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180909073707/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/labour/8796628/Ed-Miliband-sings-The-Red-Flag-and-Jerusalem-at-the-Labour-Party-Conference.html |archive-date=9 September 2018 |url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |date=19 September 2022 |title=Labour conference: National Anthem to open event |language=en-GB |work=] |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-62960726 |access-date=2 July 2023 |archive-date=2 July 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230702092857/https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-62960726 |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
The "modernisation" of Labour party policy and the unpopularity of ]'s Conservative government greatly increased Labour's appeal to "]". The party was concerned not to put off potential voters who had previously supported the Conservatives, and pledged to keep to the spending plans of the previous government, and not to increase the basic rate of income tax. After being unexpectedly defeated for a fourth consecutive time in the ], the party won the ] with a landslide majority of 179. Following a second and third election victory in the ] and the ], the name has diminished in significance. "New Labour" as a name has no official status but remains in common use to distinguish modernisers from those holding to more traditional positions who normally are referred to as "Old Labour". | |||
== Constitution and structure == | |||
===In government=== | |||
{{quote box | |||
] ]|right]] | |||
| title = ] (1995) | |||
One of the first acts of the 1997 Labour government was to give the ] operational independence in its setting of interest rates, a move mentioned neither in the manifesto nor during the election campaign. Labour held to its pledges to keep to the spending plans set by the Conservatives, causing strain with those members of the party who had hoped that the landslide would lead to more radical and increased spending. | |||
| quote = The Labour Party is a ] party. It believes that by the strength of our common endeavour we achieve more than we achieve alone, so as to create for each of us the means to realise our true potential and for all of us a community in which power, wealth and opportunity are in the hands of the many, not the few, where the rights we enjoy reflect the duties we owe, and where we live together, freely, in a spirit of solidarity, tolerance and respect. | |||
| source = Party Constitution, Labour Party Rule Book<ref name="constitution">{{cite web |title=Labour Party Rule Book |url=https://labour.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Rule-Book-2023-FINAL_web_v3.pdf |publisher=Labour Party |access-date=4 January 2023 |date=2023 |archive-date=5 July 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240705171502/https://labour.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Rule-Book-2023-FINAL_web_v3.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
| width = 25% | |||
| align = right | |||
}} | |||
The Labour Party is a membership organisation consisting of individual members and ], ], ] and the ], with which it has an electoral agreement. Members who are elected to parliamentary positions take part in the ] (PLP). Prior to ] in January 2020, members also took part in the ] (EPLP). | |||
The party's decision-making bodies on a national level formally include the ] (NEC), ] and ] (NPF)—although in practice the Parliamentary leadership has the final say on policy. The 2008 Labour Party Conference was the first at which affiliated trade unions and Constituency Labour Parties did not have the right to submit motions on contemporary issues that would previously have been debated.<ref name="Anger over 'union debate limit'">{{cite news |title=Anger over 'union debate limit' |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7002618.stm |work=] |date=19 September 2007 |access-date=13 April 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170908173252/http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7002618.stm |archive-date=8 September 2017 |url-status=live}}</ref> Labour Party conferences now include more "keynote" addresses, guest speakers and question-and-answer sessions, while specific discussion of policy now takes place in the National Policy Forum. | |||
Since 1997 Labour's economic policies have sought to take a middle way between the more centralised ] approach of past Labour governments and the ] approach of the Conservative government from 1979 to 1997. Consequently one of the most popular policies introduced was Britain's first ], a policy negotiated by Labour's affiliated trade unions in return for accepting the change to Clause IV of the party constitution. This was a significant part of Labours history as it indicates the drastic change from Old, to New Labour. There have also been various programmes targeted at specific sections of the population; the target for reducing ] was achieved by 2000. Chancellor ] oversaw the SureStart scheme intended for young families, a new system of ] for those working with below-average incomes and an energy allowance provided to pensioners during the winter. By most statistical measures, unemployment has fallen from just over 1.5 million in 1997 to around the one million mark. | |||
The Labour Party is an ] without a ], and the Labour Party Rule Book legally regulates the organisation and the relationship with members.<ref name=lgn-20150917>{{cite news |url=http://www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=24388%3Aunincorporated-associations-and-elections&catid=49%3Acomment-a-analysis-articles&Itemid=9 |title=Unincorporated associations and elections |first=Athelstane |last=Aamodt |newspaper=Local Government Lawyer |date=17 September 2015 |access-date=21 September 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160110152117/http://www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=24388%3Aunincorporated-associations-and-elections&catid=49%3Acomment-a-analysis-articles&Itemid=9 |archive-date=10 January 2016 |url-status=live}}</ref> The ] represents the party on behalf of the other members of the Labour Party in any legal matters or actions.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2007/51.html |title=Watt (formerly Carter) (sued on his own on behalf of the other members of the Labour Party) (Respondent) v. Ahsan (Appellant) |publisher=] |work=The Lords of Appeal |id= UKHL 51 |date=18 July 2007 |access-date=2 October 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150517225223/http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2007/51.html |archive-date=17 May 2015 |url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
Other moves appear to contradict the above. For example in December 1997, 47 left-wing Labour MPs rebelled when the government carried through the previous administration's plans to cut the benefits paid to new single-parents. Tuition fees for university students were also introduced with no a debate within the ] itself. The government also promoted wider use of ] and the ], which were opposed particularly by trade unions as a form of ]. | |||
=== Membership and registered supporters === | |||
The New Labour government has been closer to corporate business interests than any previous Labour government. Several Policy Taskforces in 1997 and 1998 included industrialists and business leaders such as ], a former chairman of ], ] of the supermarket dynasty, and ''Alec Reed'' of ]. There have been various reports regarding the effect of such close links, in policies such as the ]s, the deregulation of utilities, privatisation, and the tendency to ] government services. | |||
] | |||
As of 31 December 2010, under the new leader ], individual membership of the party was 193,261; a historical low for the Party since the 1930s.<ref name="search">{{cite web|url=https://search.electoralcommission.org.uk//Api/Accounts/Documents/826|title=Financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2011|website=search.electoralcommission.org.uk}}</ref> Membership remained relatively unchanged in the following years.<ref name="search"/><ref>{{cite web|url=https://search.electoralcommission.org.uk//Api/Accounts/Documents/15409|title=Financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2013|website=search.electoralcommission.org.uk}}</ref><ref name="search2">{{cite web|url=https://search.electoralcommission.org.uk/Api/Accounts/Documents/17488|title=Financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2015|website=search.electoralcommission.org.uk|access-date=26 July 2023|archive-date=1 July 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230701174044/https://search.electoralcommission.org.uk/Api/Accounts/Documents/17488|url-status=live}}</ref> In August 2015, prior to the ], the Labour Party reported 292,505 full members, 147,134 affiliated supporters (mostly from affiliated ]s and ]) and 110,827 registered supporters; a total of about 550,000 members and supporters.<ref name=independent-20150910>{{cite news |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/labour-leadership-contest-after-88-days-of-campaigning-how-did-labours-candidates-do-10495726.html |title=Labour leadership contest: After 88 days of campaigning, how did Labour's candidates do? |author=Oliver Wright |newspaper=] |date=10 September 2015 |access-date=11 September 2015 |quote=the electorate is divided into three groups: 292,000 members, 148,000 union "affiliates" and 112,000 registered supporters who each paid £3 to take part |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150914020112/http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/labour-leadership-contest-after-88-days-of-campaigning-how-did-labours-candidates-do-10495726.html |archive-date=14 September 2015 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref name=mirror-20150825>{{cite news |url=https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/four-labour-leadership-candidates-rule-6316659 |title=All four Labour leadership candidates rule out legal fight – despite voter count plummeting by 60,000 |first=Dan |last=Bloom |newspaper=] |date=25 August 2015 |access-date=11 September 2015 |quote=total of those who can vote now stands at 550,816 ... The total still eligible to vote are now 292,505 full paid-up members, 147,134 supporters affiliated through the unions and 110,827 who've paid a £3 fee. |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150908123212/http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/four-labour-leadership-candidates-rule-6316659 |archive-date=8 September 2015 |url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
Following the election of ] as leader, individual membership almost doubled to 388,262 in December 2015;<ref name="search2"/> and rose significantly again the following year to 543,645 in December 2016.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230920015435/https://search.electoralcommission.org.uk/Api/Accounts/Documents/20546 |date=20 September 2023 }} ''Labour Party''. July 2018. Retrieved 20 January 2022.</ref> | |||
Labour's second term saw substantial increases in public spending, especially on the ], which the government insisted must be linked to the reforms it was proposing. Spending on education was likewise increased, with schools encouraged to adopt "specialisms". Teachers and their trade unions strongly criticized the Prime Minister's spokesman ] when he stated that this policy meant the end of "the bog-standard ]". | |||
{{As of|December 2017}}, the party had 564,443 full members,<ref name=labour-201807>{{cite web |url=http://search.electoralcommission.org.uk/Api/Accounts/Documents/20546 |title=The Labour Party – Financial statements for the year ending 31 December 2017 |website=Labour Party |date=July 2018 |access-date=20 January 2022 |archive-date=20 January 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220120230152/http://search.electoralcommission.org.uk/Api/Accounts/Documents/20546 |url-status=live }}</ref> a peak since 1980 making it the largest political party in Western Europe.<ref name=huffpost-20170613>{{cite news |url=http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/labour-party-membership-soars-by-33000-in-four-days-since-general-election_uk_59400feee4b0e84514ee930f |title=Labour Party Membership Soars By 35,000 In Just Four Days – After 'Corbyn Surge' In 2017 General Election |last=Waugh |first=Paul |work=] |date=13 June 2017 |access-date=30 June 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170630055010/http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/labour-party-membership-soars-by-33000-in-four-days-since-general-election_uk_59400feee4b0e84514ee930f |archive-date=30 June 2017 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/parliament-and-elections/parliament/uk-political-party-membership-figures-august-2018/ |title=UK political party membership figures: August 2018 |website=House of Commons library |date=3 September 2018 |access-date=4 September 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180903215310/https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/parliament-and-elections/parliament/uk-political-party-membership-figures-august-2018/ |archive-date=3 September 2018 |url-status=live |last1=Audickas |first1=Lukas}}</ref> Consequently, membership fees became the largest component of the party's income, overtaking trade unions donations which were previously of most financial importance, making Labour the most financially well-off British political party in 2017.<ref name=guardian-20180822>{{cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/aug/22/labour-coffers-make-party-richest-in-britain |title=Labour is Britain's richest party – and it's not down to the unions |last=Sabbagh |first=Dan |newspaper=] |date=22 August 2018 |access-date=23 August 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180822203856/https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/aug/22/labour-coffers-make-party-richest-in-britain |archive-date=22 August 2018 |url-status=live}}</ref> As of December 2019, the party had 532,046 full members.<ref name=labour-202007>{{cite web |url=http://search.electoralcommission.org.uk/Api/Accounts/Documents/22602 |title=The Labour Party – Financial statements for the year ending 31 December 2019 |website=The Electoral Commission |date=July 2020 |access-date=20 January 2022 |archive-date=20 January 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220120230151/http://search.electoralcommission.org.uk/Api/Accounts/Documents/22602 |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
] | |||
In terms of foreign policy Labour aspired to put Britain "at the heart of Europe" whilst attempting to maintain military and diplomatic links to the ]. Initially, ], as Foreign Secretary of the first Blair Cabinet, attempted to instigate an "ethical foreign policy". Whilst the next Foreign Secretary ] somewhat downplayed this, the Party has sought to put the promotion of human rights and democracy, and latterly the war against terrorism, at the core of British foreign policy. This has led to a new emphasis on the ], with ministers ] and ] holding some influence within the administration. Tony Blair managed to persuade ] to take a more active role in ] in 1999, and British forces took part in the international coalition which attacked the ] regime in ] in 2001 after the regime refused to hand over ] and expel ] from the country in the aftermath of the ]. | |||
In the ], 490,731 people voted, of which 401,564 (81.8%) were members, 76,161 (15.5%) had affiliated membership and 13,006 (2.6%) were registered supporters. The registered supporter class was abolished in 2021.<ref name=hocl-20220830>{{cite web |url=https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN05125/SN05125.pdf |title=Membership of political parties in Great Britain |last1=Burton |first1=Matthew |last2=Tunnicliffe |first2=Richard |publisher=UK Parliament |work=House of Commons Library |date=30 August 2022 |access-date=25 March 2023 |archive-date=25 March 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230325200441/https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN05125/SN05125.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> By December 2023, the party's membership had fallen to 370,450 members.<ref name=bbc-20240822>{{cite news |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c33n6311577o |title=Party memberships fell in 2023 despite looming election |last=Morton |first=Becky |work=BBC News |date=22 August 2024 |access-date=23 August 2024 |archive-date=22 August 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240822205546/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c33n6311577o |url-status=live}}</ref> In March 2024, it was revealed the party's membership had reduced further to 366,604 members.<ref name="Membership, March 2024"/> | |||
The decision of the UK to fight alongside the United States and a number of forces in smaller numbers from around the world (a majority of UN member governments opposed the war but a large minority supported it) in the ] succeeded in removing ] and the ruthless ] regime in ]. However, the Government's involvement in the invasion caused much public disapproval in the UK, with many calling Tony Blair's credibility into question when questions were raised as to the veracity of intelligence concerning Iraq's ]. This loss of support contributed to the substantial reduction of Labour's majority in the ]. The Blair government has also attempted to crack down on the perceived threat of terrorism since the ] in the ], eliciting claims that they are undermining civil liberties and the rule of law. | |||
=== |
==== Northern Ireland ==== | ||
For many years, Labour held to a policy of not allowing residents of ] to apply for membership,<ref name="labour.org.uk">{{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.labour.org.uk/join/form.html |title=Labour Party membership form }}, ca. 1999. Retrieved 31 March 2007. "Residents of Northern Ireland are not eligible for membership."</ref> instead supporting the ] (SDLP) which informally takes the Labour whip in the House of Commons.<ref name="Understanding Ulster"> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110806163814/http://cain.ulst.ac.uk/issues/politics/docs/alcock.htm |date=6 August 2011 }} by Antony Alcock, Ulster Society Publications, 1997. Chapter II: The Unloved, Unwanted Garrison. Via Conflict Archive on the Internet. Retrieved 31 October 2008.</ref> The 2003 Labour Party Conference accepted legal advice that the party could not continue to prohibit residents of the province joining,<ref name="Labour NI ban overturned">{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/northern_ireland/3154222.stm |title=Labour NI ban overturned |work=] |date=1 October 2003 |access-date=31 May 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130307232249/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/northern_ireland/3154222.stm |archive-date=7 March 2013 |url-status=live}}</ref> and whilst the National Executive has established a regional constituency party it has not yet agreed to contest elections there. In December 2015 a meeting of the members of the Labour Party in Northern Ireland decided unanimously to contest the ].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.labourpartyni.org/lpni_prepare_to_fight_elections |title=LPNI prepare to fight elections |work=Labour Party in Northern Ireland |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160114113356/http://www.labourpartyni.org/lpni_prepare_to_fight_elections |archive-date=14 January 2016}}</ref> The Labour Party in Northern Ireland moved a model motion, in July 2020, for Labour's NEC to allow them a "Right to Stand".<ref name=LabourNI>{{cite web |url=https://www.labourpartyni.org/2020/07/04/labour-party-northern-ireland-model-statement-on-right-to-stand/ |date=4 July 2020 |access-date=23 January 2022 |title=Labour Party Northern Ireland model statement on Right to Stand |publisher=]}}</ref> The motion noted how the SDLP's alliance with ], a member-party of the ] in the Republic of Ireland, had meant that it was campaigning against the ], which it saw as questioning "the legitimacy of Labour's sister party relationship".<ref name=LabourNI/> | |||
=== Trade union link === | |||
], ]]] | |||
{{see also|Trade unionism in the United Kingdom}} | |||
] showing their support for the Labour party on their ] offices during the 2015 general election.]] | |||
The ] is the co-ordinating structure that supports the policy and campaign activities of affiliated union members within the Labour Party at the national, regional and local level.<ref name="ReferenceB">{{cite web |url=http://www.labour.org.uk/tulo/ |access-date=10 February 2014 |url-status=dead |title=Trade Union and Labour Party Liaison Organisation (TULO) |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140122125049/http://www.labour.org.uk/tulo/ |archive-date=22 January 2014}}</ref> | |||
As it was founded by the unions to represent the interests of working-class people, Labour's link with the unions has always been a defining characteristic of the party. In recent years this link has come under increasing strain, with the ] being expelled from the party in 2004 for allowing its branches in Scotland to affiliate to the left-wing ].<ref name="RMT 'breached' Labour party rules">{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/3432409.stm |title=RMT 'breached' Labour party rules |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170908172047/http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/3432409.stm |archive-date=8 September 2017 |work=] |date=27 January 2004}}</ref> Other unions have also faced calls from members to reduce financial support for the Party<ref name="Labour's link to unions in danger">{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/3810417.stm |title=Labour's link to unions in danger |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170908172107/http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/3810417.stm |archive-date=8 September 2017 |work=] |date=16 June 2004}}</ref> and seek more effective political representation for their views on ], ] cuts and the anti-] laws.<ref name="TUC Congress Voices">{{cite web |url=http://www.congressvoices.org/2009/84-political-representation-of-members/ |title=CWU resolution to TUC Congress 2009 |publisher=] |access-date=13 April 2010 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100621194852/http://www.congressvoices.org/2009/84-political-representation-of-members/ |archive-date=21 June 2010}}</ref> Unison and ] have both threatened to withdraw funding from constituency MPs and Dave Prentis of ] has warned that the union will write "no more blank cheques" and is dissatisfied with "feeding the hand that bites us".<ref name="Dunton">{{cite magazine |last=Dunton |first=Jim |url=http://www.lgcplus.com/policy-and-politics/latest-policy-and-politics-news/unison-no-more-blank-cheques-for-labour/5002935.article |title=Unison: "no more blank cheques' for Labour |magazine=Local Government Chronicle |date=17 June 2009 |access-date=13 April 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150721171120/http://www.lgcplus.com/policy-and-politics/latest-policy-and-politics-news/unison-no-more-blank-cheques-for-labour/5002935.article |archive-date=21 July 2015 |url-status=live}}</ref> Union funding was redesigned in 2013 after the ].<ref name="BBC News">{{cite news |title=Miliband urges 'historic' changes to Labour's union links |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-23234340 |work=] |date=9 July 2013 |access-date=20 June 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181028015528/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-23234340 |archive-date=28 October 2018 |url-status=live}}</ref> The ], which "severed links" with Labour in 2004, re-joined the party under Corbyn's leadership in 2015.<ref>{{cite news |author1=Features |title=Corbyn has brought back Labour, so the FBU brought back the firefighters |url=https://www.morningstaronline.co.uk/a-6ac6-Corbyn-has-brought-back-Labour,-so-the-FBU-brought-back-the-firefighters |access-date=16 January 2017 |work=] |date=24 December 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170118032356/https://www.morningstaronline.co.uk/a-6ac6-Corbyn-has-brought-back-Labour,-so-the-FBU-brought-back-the-firefighters |archive-date=18 January 2017 |url-status=dead}}</ref> | |||
New Labour (as a series of values) is often characterised as a belief in 'no rights without responsibilities' -- that a citizen should recognise that one possesses responsibilities linked with any legal rights they hold. The concept of a 'stakeholder society' is quite prominent in New Labour thinking. As noted above, New Labour thought also embraces the notion of the "Third Way", although critics point to the lack of any concise statement of its meaning. The term "Third Way" has since fallen from use. | |||
=== European and international affiliation === | |||
The name "New Labour" has also been widely satirised. Critics associate the new name with an unprecedented use of '] in the party's relationship with media. The ] attempted to tarnish the new Labour tag during the 1997 election campaign using the slogan 'New Labour, New Danger'. After ]'s budgets became more and more ], '']'' magazine began to call the party 'New' Labour. Oddly, it continues to do so even when discussing privatisation or pro free-market Labour initiatives (a frequent theme, especially in "Doing the Rounds", the medical column, and "In the Back", the investigative section). ''Private Eye'' also uses the term when mentioning the more authoritarian aspects of Labour policy; in this context the ironic inverted commas would normally be more appropriate around ''Labour'' rather than ''New''. | |||
The Labour Party was a founder member of the ] (PES). The European Parliamentary Labour Party's 10 ] were part of the ] (S&D), the second largest ]. The Labour Party was represented by ] in the PES presidency.<ref name="ReferenceC">{{cite web |url=http://www.labour.org.uk/labour-in-europe |title=Party of European Socialists |access-date=10 February 2014 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131208113936/http://www.labour.org.uk/labour-in-europe |archive-date=8 December 2013}}</ref> | |||
The party was a member of the ] between 1923 and 1940.<ref name="books.google.com">{{cite book |last=Kowalski |first=Werner |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ehBMAQAAIAAJ |title=Geschichte der sozialistischen arbeiter-internationale: 1923–1940 |language=de |trans-title=History of the Socialist Workers' International: 1923–1940 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161202203949/https://books.google.com/books/about/Geschichte_der_Sozialistischen_Arbeiter.html?id=ehBMAQAAIAAJ |archive-date=2 December 2016 |location=Berlin |publisher=Dt. Verl. d. Wissenschaften |date=1985 |via=]}}</ref> Since 1951, the party has been a member of the ], which was founded thanks to the efforts of the Clement Attlee leadership. In February 2013, the Labour Party NEC decided to downgrade participation to observer membership status, "in view of ethical concerns, and to develop international co-operation through new networks".<ref name="Black">{{cite web |last=Black |first=Ann |url=http://www.leftfutures.org/2013/02/report-from-labours-january-executive |title=Report from Labour's January executive |publisher=Leftfutures.org |date=6 February 2013 |access-date=31 May 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150617225505/http://www.leftfutures.org/2013/02/report-from-labours-january-executive/ |archive-date=17 June 2015 |url-status=live}}</ref> Labour was a founding member of the ] international founded in co-operation with the ] and other social-democratic parties on 22 May 2013.<ref name="Spiegel.de">{{cite news |url=http://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/progressive-alliance-sozialdemokraten-gruenden-weltweites-netzwerk-a-901352.html |title=Progressive Alliance: Sozialdemokraten gründen weltweites Netzwerk |language=de |trans-title=Progressive Alliance: Social Democrats establish global network |newspaper=] |date=22 May 2013 |publisher=Spiegel.de |access-date=31 May 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150721152051/http://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/progressive-alliance-sozialdemokraten-gruenden-weltweites-netzwerk-a-901352.html |archive-date=21 July 2015 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="Vorwurf: SPD spaltet die Linken">{{cite web |url=http://kurier.at/politik/ausland/vorwurf-spd-spaltet-die-linken/13.418.163 |title=Vorwurf: SPD "spaltet die Linken" |language=de |trans-title=Accusation: SPD "splits the left" |publisher=Kurier.At |date=22 May 2013 |access-date=31 May 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150810160149/http://kurier.at/politik/ausland/vorwurf-spd-spaltet-die-linken/13.418.163 |archive-date=10 August 2015 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="Morgenweb.de">{{cite web |url=http://www.morgenweb.de/nachrichten/politik/150-jahre-spd/vorwarts-in-eine-ungewisse-zukunft-1.1044259 |title=Vorwärts in eine ungewisse Zukunft – 150 Jahre SPD |language=de |trans-title=Forward to an uncertain future – 150 years of the SPD |publisher=Morgenweb.de |date=22 May 2013 |access-date=31 May 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150721153627/http://www.morgenweb.de/nachrichten/politik/150-jahre-spd/vorwarts-in-eine-ungewisse-zukunft-1.1044259 |archive-date=21 July 2015 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |url=http://www.dw.de/sozialdemokratische-parteien-gr%C3%BCnden-neues-b%C3%BCndnis/a-16830338 |title=Sozialdemokratische Parteien gründen neues Bündnis |language=de |trans-title=Social democratic parties found new alliance |work=] |access-date=26 December 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150426175344/http://www.dw.de/sozialdemokratische-parteien-gr%C3%BCnden-neues-b%C3%BCndnis/a-16830338 |archive-date=26 April 2015 |url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
In left-wing circles, the name "New Labour" or Neo Labour is used ]ly to refer to the perceived domination of the Labour Party by its right-wing. Indeed, some socialists argue that Labour has become so fond of ] policies that it is ] rather than ]. Whilst in theory the Labour Party has remained a social democratic organisation, there remain unresolved questions regarding the centralised and highly personalised style of Tony Blair's leadership. Some critics see this as a sign of creeping ].{{fact}} There also appears to be a tendency to create policy "on the hoof", to coincide with opinions expressed in the media and newspapers. Former Shadow Cabinet member ] characterised the resulting policy confusion as a "soufflé of good intentions." | |||
== Electoral performance == | |||
==Labour's third successive term from 2005== | |||
{{Main|Electoral history of the Labour Party (UK)}} | |||
] being called. This one is seen in ] in mid-January 2005.]] | |||
For all detailed election results involving the Labour Party including: general elections, devolved national elections, London Assembly, London Mayoral, combined authority and European Parliament elections see: ]. | |||
The party's popularity and membership have steadily declined since 2001 . Labour won the ] with only 35.3% of the total vote and a majority of 66. Their majority is now 64 following a ] loss to the ]. | |||
In all general elections since ], Labour has been either the governing party or the ].<ref name=":8"/> | |||
Tony Blair's third term has been dominated even more than the second by dealing with ]. Shortly after the General Election, in incidents in July 2005 referred to as ], a number of bombs were detonated on buses and tube trains in London. A fortnight later, further attempts were made by terrorists to launch bombings, although these were thwarted. As a result, relations between Labour and ] have become more important. | |||
=== UK general election results === | |||
The Labour government recently faced defeat in the ] over the length of time suspected terrorists could be detained without trial although most of the Terrorism Bill passed into law and a compromise measure on the length of detention without trial did get passed. | |||
{{see also|Elections in the United Kingdom#General elections}} | |||
Following the ], Labour became the Official Opposition after the Conservatives went into ] with the ].<ref name=":8">{{cite web |url=https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-7529/CBP-7529.pdf#page=8 |title=UK Election Statistics: 1918–2023, A Long Century of Elections |last1=Cracknell |first1=Richard |last2=Uberoi |first2=Elise |last3=Burton |first3=Matthew |date=9 August 2023 |website=House of Commons Library |access-date=27 September 2023 |page=8 |archive-date=26 September 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210926002706/https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-7529/CBP-7529.pdf#page=8 |url-status=live }}</ref> Labour's first minority governments came following the ] and ] general elections, the latter being the first time Labour were the largest party in the country by seats won.<ref name=":8"/> They formed their first majority government following the ].<ref name=":8"/> However, after winning the ], Labour would lose the following election in ] to the Conservatives despite gaining the highest share of votes to date at 48.8%.<ref name=":8"/> During the ] election, Labour posted their worst vote share in the post-war period at 27.6%.<ref name=":8"/> In ], a party record of 418 Labour MPs were elected.<ref name=":8"/> At the ], Labour won a landslide victory and returned to government with ] as prime minister.<ref name=":112"/> | |||
{{see also|Elections in the United Kingdom#General elections}} | |||
The introduction of ] presents political and logistical difficulties as ] groups increasingly oppose the creation of a biometric identity database. Despite opposition from the Conservatives, Liberal Democrats and some Labour MPs, the Bill has passed through all of its readings in the Commons so far. However, recent leaked Home Office memos have condemned the scheme as originally devised. | |||
{|class="sortable wikitable" style="text-align:center" | |||
|- | |||
|+ ] | |||
|- | |||
! rowspan=2|Election | |||
! rowspan=2|Leader<ref>{{cite book |first1=Alastair J. |last1=Reid |first2=Henry |last2=Pelling |title=A Short History of the Labour Party |year=2005 |publisher=Palgrave Macmillan |location=New York |isbn=1-4039-9313-0 |page=210|edition=12th }}</ref><ref name="leaders">{{cite news |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-37357314 |title=A quick guide to Labour's leaders |website=BBC News |date=23 September 2016 |access-date=27 September 2023 |archive-date=25 September 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230925224546/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-37357314 |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
! colspan=2|Votes | |||
! colspan=3|Seats | |||
! rowspan=2|Position | |||
! rowspan=2|Result | |||
! rowspan=2|Ref | |||
|- | |||
! No. | |||
! Share | |||
! No. | |||
! {{Tooltip|±|Net seat gain/loss}} | |||
! Share | |||
|- | |||
!] | |||
|rowspan="2"|{{sortname|Keir|Hardie}} | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|62,698 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|1.8 | |||
|style="text-align:center;"|{{Infobox political party/seats|2|670|{{party color|Labour Party (UK)}}}} | |||
|{{increase}} 2 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|0.3 | |||
|4th | |||
|{{no2|]–]}} | |||
|<ref>{{cite book |first=F. W. S. |last=Craig |author-link=F. W. S. Craig |title=British General Election Manifestos, 1900–1974 |year=1975 |publisher=Macmillan |location=London |isbn=0-333-17154-3 |page=1}}</ref> | |||
|- | |||
!] | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|321,663 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|5.7 | |||
|style="text-align:center;"|{{Infobox political party/seats|29|670|{{party color|Labour Party (UK)}}}} | |||
|{{increase}} 27 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|4.3 | |||
|{{steady}} 4th | |||
|{{no2|]}} | |||
|<ref>{{cite book |first=F. W. S. |last=Craig |title=British General Election Manifestos, 1900–1974 |year=1975 |publisher=Macmillan |location=London |isbn=0-333-17154-3 |page=7}}</ref> | |||
|- | |||
!data-sort-value="1910.1"|] | |||
|{{sortname|Arthur|Henderson}} | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|505,657 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|7.6 | |||
|style="text-align:center;"|{{Infobox political party/seats|40|670|{{party color|Labour Party (UK)}}}} | |||
|{{increase}} 11 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|6.0 | |||
|{{steady}} 4th | |||
|{{no2|Liberal minority}} | |||
|<ref>{{cite book |first=F. W. S. |last=Craig |title=British General Election Manifestos, 1900–1974 |year=1975 |publisher=Macmillan |location=London |isbn=0-333-17154-3 |page=14}}</ref> | |||
|- | |||
!data-sort-value="1910.2"|] | |||
|{{sortname|George Nicoll|Barnes}} | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|371,802 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|7.1 | |||
|style="text-align:center;"|{{Infobox political party/seats|42|670|{{party color|Labour Party (UK)}}}} | |||
|{{increase}} 2 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|6.3 | |||
|{{steady}} 4th | |||
|{{no2|Liberal minority}} | |||
|<ref name="CraigFWS23">{{cite book |first=F. W. S. |last=Craig |title=British General Election Manifestos, 1900–1974 |year=1975 |publisher=Macmillan |location=London |isbn=0-333-17154-3 |page=23}}</ref> | |||
|- | |||
!]{{efn|The first election held under the ] in which all men over 21, and most women over the age of 30 could vote, and therefore a much larger electorate.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.parliament.uk/about/living-heritage/transformingsociety/parliament-and-the-first-world-war/legislation-and-acts-of-war/acts-of-war---representation-of-the-people-act-1918--/ |title=Representation of the People Act 1918 |website=UK Parliament |access-date=6 October 2023 |archive-date=10 November 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231110172925/https://www.parliament.uk/about/living-heritage/transformingsociety/parliament-and-the-first-world-war/legislation-and-acts-of-war/acts-of-war---representation-of-the-people-act-1918--/ |url-status=live }}</ref>}} | |||
|{{sortname|William|Adamson}} | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|2,245,777 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|20.8 | |||
|style="text-align:center;"|{{Infobox political party/seats|57|707|{{party color|Labour Party (UK)}}}} | |||
|{{increase}} 15 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|8.1 | |||
|{{steady}} 4th | |||
|{{no2|]–Conservative}} | |||
|{{refn|<ref name=":1617"/><ref>{{cite book |first=F. W. S. |last=Craig |title=British General Election Manifestos, 1900–1974 |year=1975 |publisher=Macmillan |location=London |isbn=0-333-17154-3 |page=27}}</ref>}} | |||
|- | |||
!] | |||
|{{sortname|J. R.|Clynes}} | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|4,237,349 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|29.7 | |||
|style="text-align:center;"|{{Infobox political party/seats|142|615|{{party color|Labour Party (UK)}}}} | |||
|{{increase}} 85 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|23.1 | |||
|{{increase}} 2nd | |||
|{{no2|Conservative}} | |||
|{{refn|<ref name=":1617"/><ref>{{cite book |first=F. W. S. |last=Craig |title=British General Election Manifestos, 1900–1974 |year=1975 |publisher=Macmillan |location=London |isbn=0-333-17154-3 |page=35}}</ref>}} | |||
|- | |||
!] | |||
|rowspan="3"|{{sortname|Ramsay|MacDonald}} | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|4,439,780 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|30.7 | |||
|style="text-align:center;"|{{Infobox political party/seats|191|615|{{party color|Labour Party (UK)}}}} | |||
|{{increase}} 49 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|30.1 | |||
|{{steady}} 2nd | |||
|{{yes2|Labour minority}} | |||
|{{refn|<ref name=":1617"/><ref>{{cite book |first=F. W. S. |last=Craig |title=British General Election Manifestos, 1900–1974 |year=1975 |publisher=Macmillan |location=London |isbn=0-333-17154-3 |page=44}}</ref>}} | |||
|- | |||
!] | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|5,489,087 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|33.3 | |||
|style="text-align:center;"|{{Infobox political party/seats|151|615|{{party color|Labour Party (UK)}}}} | |||
|{{decrease}} 40 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|24.6 | |||
|{{steady}} 2nd | |||
|{{no2|Conservative}} | |||
|{{refn|<ref name=":1617"/><ref>{{cite book |first=F. W. S. |last=Craig |title=British General Election Manifestos, 1900–1974 |year=1975 |publisher=Macmillan |location=London |isbn=0-333-17154-3 |page=54}}</ref>}} | |||
|- | |||
!]{{efn|First election held under the ] which gave all women aged over 21 the vote.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.parliament.uk/mps-lords-and-offices/offices/commons/media-relations-group/news/on-this-day-on-30-may-1929-women-vote-on-same-terms-as-men-for-first-time-in-general-election/ |title=On this day in May 1929 women vote in general election on same terms as men |website=UK Parliament |date=30 May 2018 |access-date=6 October 2023 |archive-date=10 November 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231110172924/https://www.parliament.uk/mps-lords-and-offices/offices/commons/media-relations-group/news/on-this-day-on-30-may-1929-women-vote-on-same-terms-as-men-for-first-time-in-general-election/ |url-status=live }}</ref>}} | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|8,370,417 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|37.1 | |||
|style="text-align:center;"|{{Infobox political party/seats|287|615|{{party color|Labour Party (UK)}}}} | |||
|{{increase}} 136 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|47.0 | |||
|{{increase}} 1st | |||
|{{yes2|Labour minority}} | |||
|{{refn|<ref name=":1617"/><ref>{{cite book |first=F. W. S. |last=Craig |title=British General Election Manifestos, 1900–1974 |year=1975 |publisher=Macmillan |location=London |isbn=0-333-17154-3 |page=69}}</ref>}} | |||
|- | |||
!] | |||
|{{sortname|Arthur|Henderson}} | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|6,649,630 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|30.9 | |||
|style="text-align:center;"|{{Infobox political party/seats|52|615|{{party color|Labour Party (UK)}}}} | |||
|{{decrease}} 235 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|8.5 | |||
|{{decrease}} 2nd | |||
|{{no2|Conservative–Liberal–]}} | |||
|{{refn|<ref name=":1617"/><ref>{{cite book |first=F. W. S. |last=Craig |title=British General Election Manifestos, 1900–1974 |year=1975 |publisher=Macmillan |location=London |isbn=0-333-17154-3 |page=89}}</ref>}} | |||
|- | |||
!] | |||
|rowspan="5"|{{sortname|Clement|Attlee}} | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|8,325,491 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|38.0 | |||
|style="text-align:center;"|{{Infobox political party/seats|154|615|{{party color|Labour Party (UK)}}}} | |||
|{{increase}} 102 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|25.0 | |||
|{{steady}} 2nd | |||
|{{no2|Conservative–]–National Labour}} | |||
|{{refn|<ref name=":1617"/><ref>{{cite book |first=F. W. S. |last=Craig |title=British General Election Manifestos, 1900–1974 |year=1975 |publisher=Macmillan |location=London |isbn=0-333-17154-3 |page=101}}</ref>}} | |||
|- | |||
!] | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|11,967,746 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|48.0 | |||
|style="text-align:center;"|{{Infobox political party/seats|393|640|{{party color|Labour Party (UK)}}}} | |||
|{{increase}} 239 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|61.0 | |||
|{{increase}} 1st | |||
|{{yes2|Labour}} | |||
|<ref name=":1617"/> | |||
|- | |||
!] | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|13,266,176 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|46.1 | |||
|style="text-align:center;"|{{Infobox political party/seats|315|625|{{party color|Labour Party (UK)}}}} | |||
|{{decrease}} 78 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|50.4 | |||
|{{steady}} 1st | |||
|{{yes2|Labour}} | |||
|<ref name=":1617"/> | |||
|- | |||
!] | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|13,948,883 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|48.8 | |||
|style="text-align:center;"|{{Infobox political party/seats|295|625|{{party color|Labour Party (UK)}}}} | |||
|{{decrease}} 20 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|47.2 | |||
|{{decrease}} 2nd | |||
|{{no2|Conservative}} | |||
|<ref name=":1617"/> | |||
|- | |||
!] | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|12,405,254 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|46.4 | |||
|style="text-align:center;"|{{Infobox political party/seats|277|630|{{party color|Labour Party (UK)}}}} | |||
|{{decrease}} 18 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|44.0 | |||
|{{steady}} 2nd | |||
|{{no2|Conservative}} | |||
|<ref name=":1617"/> | |||
|- | |||
!] | |||
|{{sortname|Hugh|Gaitskell}} | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|12,216,172 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|43.8 | |||
|style="text-align:center;"|{{Infobox political party/seats|258|630|{{party color|Labour Party (UK)}}}} | |||
|{{decrease}} 19 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|40.1 | |||
|{{steady}} 2nd | |||
|{{no2|Conservative}} | |||
|<ref name=":1617"/> | |||
|- | |||
!] | |||
|rowspan="5"|{{sortname|Harold|Wilson}} | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|12,205,808 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|44.1 | |||
|style="text-align:center;"|{{Infobox political party/seats|317|630|{{party color|Labour Party (UK)}}}} | |||
|{{increase}} 59 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|50.3 | |||
|{{increase}} 1st | |||
|{{yes2|Labour}} | |||
|<ref name=":1617"/> | |||
|- | |||
!] | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|13,096,629 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|48.0 | |||
|style="text-align:center;"|{{Infobox political party/seats|364|630|{{party color|Labour Party (UK)}}}} | |||
|{{increase}} 47 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|57.8 | |||
|{{steady}} 1st | |||
|{{yes2|Labour}} | |||
|<ref name=":1617"/> | |||
|- | |||
!]{{efn|Franchise extended to all 18 to 20-year-olds under the ].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.parliament.uk/about/living-heritage/transformingsociety/electionsvoting/1969-rotp-act/1969-rotp-collections-/1969-sixth-reform-act-/ |archive-date=1 January 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240101172411/https://www.parliament.uk/about/living-heritage/transformingsociety/electionsvoting/1969-rotp-act/1969-rotp-collections-/1969-sixth-reform-act-/ |url-status=dead |title=1969 Representation of the People Act |website=UK Parliament House of Commons Library |access-date=6 October 2023}}</ref>}} | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|12,208,758 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|43.1 | |||
|style="text-align:center;"|{{Infobox political party/seats|288|630|{{party color|Labour Party (UK)}}}} | |||
|{{decrease}} 76 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|45.7 | |||
|{{decrease}} 2nd | |||
|{{no2|Conservative}} | |||
|<ref name=":1617"/> | |||
|- | |||
!data-sort-value="1974.1"|] | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|11,645,616 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|37.2 | |||
|style="text-align:center;"|{{Infobox political party/seats|301|635|{{party color|Labour Party (UK)}}}} | |||
|{{increase}} 13 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|47.4 | |||
|{{increase}} 1st | |||
|{{yes2|Labour minority}} | |||
|<ref name=":1617"/> | |||
|- | |||
!data-sort-value="1974.2"|] | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|11,457,079 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|39.3 | |||
|style="text-align:center;"|{{Infobox political party/seats|319|635|{{party color|Labour Party (UK)}}}} | |||
|{{increase}} 18 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|50.2 | |||
|{{steady}} 1st | |||
|{{yes2|Labour}} | |||
|<ref name=":1617"/> | |||
|- | |||
!] | |||
|{{sortname|James|Callaghan}} | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|11,532,218 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|36.9 | |||
|style="text-align:center;"|{{Infobox political party/seats|269|635|{{party color|Labour Party (UK)}}}} | |||
|{{decrease}} 50 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|42.4 | |||
|{{decrease}} 2nd | |||
|{{no2|Conservative}} | |||
|<ref name=":1617">{{cite web |url=https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-7529/CBP-7529.pdf |title=UK Election Statistics: 1918–2023, A Long Century of Elections |last1=Cracknell |first1=Richard |last2=Uberoi |first2=Elise |last3=Burton |first3=Matthew |date=9 August 2023 |website=House of Commons Library |access-date=28 September 2023 |pages=16–17 |archive-date=26 September 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210926002706/https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-7529/CBP-7529.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
|- | |||
!] | |||
|{{sortname|Michael|Foot}} | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|8,456,934 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|27.6 | |||
|style="text-align:center;"|{{Infobox political party/seats|209|650|{{party color|Labour Party (UK)}}}} | |||
|{{decrease}} 60 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|32.2 | |||
|{{steady}} 2nd | |||
|{{no2|Conservative}} | |||
|<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.parliament.uk/globalassets/documents/commons-information-office/m09.pdf |title=General Election Results, 9 June 1983 |website=House of Commons Public Information Office |access-date=27 September 2023 |archive-date=26 November 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201126023124/https://www.parliament.uk/globalassets/documents/commons-information-office/m09.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
|- | |||
!] | |||
|rowspan="2"|{{sortname|Neil|Kinnock}} | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|10,029,807 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|30.8 | |||
|style="text-align:center;"|{{Infobox political party/seats|229|650|{{party color|Labour Party (UK)}}}} | |||
|{{increase}} 20 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|35.2 | |||
|{{steady}} 2nd | |||
|{{no2|Conservative}} | |||
|<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.parliament.uk/globalassets/documents/commons-information-office/m11.pdf |title=General Election Results, 1987 |website=House of Commons Public Information Office |access-date=27 September 2023 |archive-date=23 October 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201023011516/https://www.parliament.uk/globalassets/documents/commons-information-office/m11.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
|- | |||
!] | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|11,560,484 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|34.4 | |||
|style="text-align:center;"|{{Infobox political party/seats|271|651|{{party color|Labour Party (UK)}}}} | |||
|{{increase}} 42 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|41.6 | |||
|{{steady}} 2nd | |||
|{{no2|Conservative}} | |||
|<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.parliament.uk/globalassets/documents/commons-information-office/m13.pdf |title=General Election Results |website=House of Commons Public Information Office |access-date=27 September 2023 |archive-date=14 November 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201114185026/https://www.parliament.uk/globalassets/documents/commons-information-office/m13.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
|- | |||
!] | |||
|rowspan="3"|{{sortname|Tony|Blair}} | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|13,518,167 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|43.2 | |||
|style="text-align:center;"|{{Infobox political party/seats|418|659|{{party color|Labour Party (UK)}}}} | |||
|{{increase}} 145 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|63.6 | |||
|{{increase}} 1st | |||
|{{yes2|Labour}} | |||
|<ref>{{cite web |url=https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/RP01-38/RP01-38.pdf |title=General Election results, 1 May 1997 |website=House of Commons Library |date=29 March 2001 |access-date=26 September 2023 |archive-date=26 September 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230926225550/https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/RP01-38/RP01-38.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
|- | |||
!] | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|10,724,953 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|40.7 | |||
|style="text-align:center;"|{{Infobox political party/seats|412|659|{{party color|Labour Party (UK)}}}} | |||
|{{decrease}} 6 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|62.7 | |||
|{{steady}} 1st | |||
|{{yes2|Labour}} | |||
|<ref>{{cite web |url=https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/RP01-54/RP01-54.pdf |title=General Election results, 7 June 2001 |website=House of Commons Library |date=18 June 2001 |access-date=26 September 2023 |archive-date=27 November 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231127162028/https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/RP01-54/RP01-54.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
|- | |||
!] | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|9,552,436 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|35.2 | |||
|style="text-align:center;"|{{Infobox political party/seats|355|646|{{party color|Labour Party (UK)}}}} | |||
|{{decrease}} 47 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|55.0 | |||
|{{steady}} 1st | |||
|{{yes2|Labour}} | |||
|<ref>{{cite web |title=General Election 2005 |url=https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/RP05-33/RP05-33.pdf |website=] |access-date=21 July 2023 |archive-date=11 August 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220811091535/https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/RP05-33/RP05-33.pdf |url-status=live |pages=32, 92}}</ref> | |||
|- | |||
!] | |||
|{{sortname|Gordon|Brown}} | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|8,606,517 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|29.0 | |||
|style="text-align:center;"|{{Infobox political party/seats|258|650|{{party color|Labour Party (UK)}}}} | |||
|{{decrease}} 90 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|40.0 | |||
|{{decrease}} 2nd | |||
|{{no2|Conservative–]}}<ref>{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/election_2010/8677552.stm |title=Election 2010 Timeline: How coalition was agreed |website=BBC News |date=13 May 2010 |access-date=26 September 2023 |archive-date=6 September 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170906140456/http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/election_2010/8677552.stm |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
|<ref>{{cite web |url=https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/RP10-36/RP10-36.pdf |title=General Election 2010 |website=House of Commons Library |date=2 February 2011 |access-date=2 October 2023 |pages=30, 86 |archive-date=8 October 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231008074838/https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/RP10-36/RP10-36.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
|- | |||
!] | |||
|{{sortname|Ed|Miliband}} | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|9,347,324 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|30.4 | |||
|style="text-align:center;"|{{Infobox political party/seats|232|650|{{party color|Labour Party (UK)}}}} | |||
|{{decrease}} 26 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|35.7 | |||
|{{steady}} 2nd | |||
|{{no2|Conservative}} | |||
|{{refn|<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/ng-interactive/2015/may/07/live-uk-election-results-in-full |title=UK 2015 general election results in full |work=The Guardian |date=7 May 2015 |access-date=26 September 2023 |archive-date=13 September 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190913214657/https://www.theguardian.com/politics/ng-interactive/2015/may/07/live-uk-election-results-in-full |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-7186/CBP-7186.pdf |title=General Election 2015 |website=House of Commons Library |date=28 July 2015 |access-date=2 October 2023 |archive-date=6 October 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231006204311/https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-7186/CBP-7186.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref>}} | |||
|- | |||
!] | |||
|rowspan="2"|{{sortname|Jeremy|Corbyn}} | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|12,877,918 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|40.0 | |||
|style="text-align:center;"|{{Infobox political party/seats|262|650|{{party color|Labour Party (UK)}}}} | |||
|{{increase}} 30 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|40.3 | |||
|{{steady}} 2nd | |||
|{{no2|Conservative minority<br />(with ])<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2017-40245514 |title=Theresa May and the DUP deal: What you need to know |last=Hunt |first=Alex |website=BBC News |date=26 June 2017 |access-date=26 September 2023 |archive-date=23 November 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181123150803/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2017-40245514 |url-status=live }}</ref>}} | |||
|<ref>{{cite web |url=https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-7979/CBP-7979.pdf |title=General Election 2017: results and analysis |website=House of Commons Library |date=29 January 2019 |access-date=2 October 2023 |pages=8–12 |archive-date=12 November 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191112183438/https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-7979/CBP-7979.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
|- | |||
!] | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|10,269,051 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|32.1 | |||
|style="text-align:center;"|{{Infobox political party/seats|202|650|{{party color|Labour Party (UK)}}}} | |||
|{{decrease}} 60 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|31.1 | |||
|{{steady}} 2nd | |||
|{{no2|Conservative}} | |||
|<ref>{{cite web |url=https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-8749/CBP-8749.pdf |title=General Election 2019: results and analysis |website=House of Commons Library |date=28 January 2020 |access-date=2 October 2023 |pages=8–12 |archive-date=18 November 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211118043715/https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-8749/CBP-8749.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
|- | |||
!] | |||
|{{sortname|Keir|Starmer}} | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|9,686,329 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|33.7 | |||
|style="text-align:center;"|{{Infobox political party/seats|411|650|{{party color|Labour Party (UK)}}}} | |||
|{{increase}} 209 | |||
|style="text-align:right;"|63.4 | |||
|{{increase}} 1st | |||
|{{yes2|Labour}} | |||
|<ref>{{cite news |work=] |url=https://ig.ft.com/uk-general-election/2024/results/ |access-date=8 July 2024 |archive-date=8 July 2024 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20240708064248/https://ig.ft.com/uk-general-election/2024/results/ |url-status=live |title=Live results: The winners in every seat}}</ref> | |||
|} | |||
] | |||
; Note: | |||
{{notelist}} | |||
== Leadership == | |||
The government faces continued controversy over the Education Reform Bill. This provides for greater financial autonomy for state schools, whilst reducing ] control, and has provoked a large parliamentary rebellion, forcing the leadership to depend on support from the opposition Conservative Party. The Bill has also resulted in outspoken criticism from those formerly in the mainstream of the Party, such as former leader ]. | |||
=== Leaders of the Labour Party since 1906 === | |||
<!-- Several articles link to this section. --> | |||
{{main|Leader of the Labour Party (UK)}} | |||
Source:<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-37357314 |title=A quick guide to Labour's leaders |publisher=BBC News |date=23 September 2016 |access-date=25 September 2023 |archive-date=25 September 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230925224546/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-37357314 |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
{{div col|colwidth=20em}} | |||
* ] (1906–1908) | |||
* ] (1908–1910) | |||
* ] (1910–1911) | |||
* ] (1911–1914) | |||
* ] (1914–1917) | |||
* ] (1917–1921) | |||
* ] (1921–1922) | |||
* ] (]–1931) | |||
* ] (]–1932) | |||
* ] (]–1935) | |||
* ] (]–1955) | |||
* ] (]–1963) | |||
** ] (1963; acting) | |||
* ] (]–1976) | |||
* ] (]–1980) | |||
* ] (]–1983) | |||
* ] (]–1992) | |||
* ] (]–1994) | |||
** ] (1994; acting)<ref name="rule">{{cite web |url=http://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN03938/SN03938.pdf |title=Labour Party Rule Book 2014 |publisher=House of Commons Library |quote=When the party is in opposition and the party leader, for whatever reason, becomes permanently unavailable, the deputy leader shall automatically become party leader on a pro-tem basis. |access-date=26 October 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161025093405/http://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN03938/SN03938.pdf |archive-date=25 October 2016 |url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
* ] (]–2007) | |||
* ] (]–2010) | |||
** ] (2010; acting)<ref name="rule"/> | |||
* ] (]–2015) | |||
** ] (2015; acting) | |||
* ] (]–2020) | |||
* ] (]–present){{div col end}} | |||
===Party |
=== Deputy Leaders of the Labour Party since 1922 === | ||
{{main|Deputy Leader of the Labour Party (UK)}} | |||
{{div col|colwidth=20em}} | |||
* ] (1922–1932) | |||
* ] (1931–1932) | |||
* ] (1932–1935) | |||
* ] (1935–1945) | |||
* ] (1945–1956) | |||
* ] (1956–1959) | |||
* ] (1959–1960) | |||
* ] (1960–1970) | |||
* ] (1970–1972) | |||
* ] (1972–1976) | |||
* ] (1976–1980) | |||
* ] (1980–1983) | |||
* ] (1983–1992) | |||
* ] (1992–1994) | |||
* ] (1994–2007) | |||
* ] (2007–2015) | |||
* ] (2015–2019) | |||
* ] (2020–present) | |||
{{div col end}} | |||
=== Leaders in the House of Lords since 1924 === | |||
The party has suffered from the recent ] scandal involving a number of people from a number of parties, where donors could lend large sums of money for undefined periods (effectively giving money). ] began investigating allegations in April 2006, and continues to do so as of October 2006. There were suggestions that major donors had been encouraged to describe the money they were giving as loans rather than donations. As a consequence, the Labour Party has run up large debts (some sources out this as much as £40 million), and is having difficulty raising further money. Some of their creditors are calling in their loans, leaving the ] in a far more powerful position than before as a vital source of revenue for the party. | |||
{{div col|colwidth=30em}} | |||
* ] (1924–1928) | |||
* ] (1928–1931) | |||
* ] (1931–1935) | |||
* ] (1935–1940) | |||
* ] (1940–1952) | |||
* ] (1952–1955) | |||
* ] (1955–1964) | |||
* ] (1964–1968) | |||
* ] (1968–1974) | |||
* ] (1974–1976) | |||
* ] (1976–1982) | |||
* ] (1982–1992) | |||
* ] (1992–1998) | |||
* ] (1998–2001) | |||
* ] (2001–2003) | |||
* ] (2003–2007) | |||
* ] (2007–2008) | |||
* ] (2008–2015) | |||
* ] (2015–present) | |||
{{div col end}} | |||
=== Labour prime ministers === | |||
This is not exclusively a problem of the Labour Party and other parliamentary parties are facing similar difficulties. Private individuals are less willing to provide donations, and party memberships are falling, leaving all the major parties more heavily reliant on a few rich donors. Both the Labour and Conservative frontbenches are openly considering extending state funding of political parties in the UK, although their rank and file members are dubious, as are the general public. | |||
{|class="sortable wikitable plainrowheaders" | |||
|- | |||
|+Labour prime ministers | |||
|- | |||
!scope="col"|Name | |||
!scope="col"|Portrait | |||
!scope="col"|Country of birth | |||
!scope="col"|Periods in office | |||
|- | |||
!scope="row"|] | |||
|] | |||
|Scotland | |||
|]; ]–]<br />(] and ]) | |||
|- | |||
!scope="row"|] | |||
|] | |||
|England | |||
|]–]; ]–]<br />(]) | |||
|- | |||
!scope="row"|] | |||
|] | |||
|England | |||
|]–]; ]–]; ]; ]–]<br />(], ] Wilson ministries) | |||
|- | |||
!scope="row"|] | |||
|] | |||
|England | |||
|]–]<br />(]) | |||
|- | |||
!scope="row"|] | |||
|] | |||
|Scotland | |||
|]–]; ]–]; ]–]<br />(], ] and ] Blair ministries) | |||
|- | |||
!scope="row"|] | |||
|] | |||
|Scotland | |||
|]–]<br />(]) | |||
|- | |||
!scope="row"|] | |||
|] | |||
|England | |||
|]–present<br />(]) | |||
|} | |||
== See also == | |||
===The May 2006 council elections=== | |||
* ] | |||
In the 4 May ], the Labour Party lost over 300 councillors across England. The gains went largely to the ], who saw their best results since 1992. Elsewhere, the ] and the ] increased their numbers of councillors by 33 and 20 respectively. The election followed the release by the ] of 1,043 foreign prisoners who had been slated for deportation, nurses being made redundant due to deficits within the ] resulting in the Health Secretary being heckled at the annual conference of the ], and revelations about the two year extra-marital affair of ] ] and his assistant private secretary ]. | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
== References == | |||
Following the poor election results, Tony Blair was forced into a planned cabinet reshuffle. Speculation about the date of his departure as leader and Prime Minister continued and intensified up. He announced that the 2006 TUC and Labour Party Conferences would be his last as leader and Prime Minister. | |||
{{reflist|refs= | |||
<ref name="auto3">{{cite news |last1=Peacock |first1=Mike |title=The European centre-left's quandary |url=http://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-europe-left-analysis-idUKKBN0O905M20150524 |access-date=26 May 2015 |work=] |date=8 May 2015 |quote=A crushing election defeat for Britain's Labour party has laid bare the dilemma facing Europe's centre-left. |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150526172436/http://uk.reuters.com/article/2015/05/24/uk-europe-left-analysis-idUKKBN0O905M20150524 |archive-date=26 May 2015 |url-status=dead}}</ref> | |||
===Tony Blair's and John Prescott's retirement from the leadership=== | |||
] announced in 2004 that he planned to stand down as leader. He stated that he would serve a full third term, implying that he would not retire until the last possible date before the General Election after the end of the third term. More recently, under pressure, he has announced that the 2006 TUC and Labour conferences were to be his last as leader and Prime Minister: he would stand down in time for a new leader to be welcomed in by the 2007 conferences. It is not clear when he decided that this was to be his timetable, or if he intended his last act as Prime Minister to be asking the Queen for a dissolution. This may have simply been a poor choice of words. He has since said that it was a mistake to announce it then, and he was simply giving an honest answer to a straight question. Following the alleged ], ], the long serving ], has long been widely expected to succeed Blair and become Labour Leader and Prime Minister. | |||
<ref name="auto4">{{cite web |last1=Dahlgreen |first1=Will |title=Britain's changing political spectrum |url=https://yougov.co.uk/news/2014/07/23/britains-changing-political-spectrum/ |publisher=] |access-date=26 May 2015 |date=23 July 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150526172107/https://yougov.co.uk/news/2014/07/23/britains-changing-political-spectrum/ |archive-date=26 May 2015 |url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
Ex-], ], has said recently he expects there to be a leadership contest when ] steps down. Potential competitors to ] include: | |||
* current ] ] -- he has announced he is not planning to run for any other job than Home Secretary; | |||
* ] ] -- he has announced that there should be a serious contender; | |||
* ] -- he is so far the only declared contender other than Gordon Brown, although he may not be able to get the signatures of the 12.5% of Labour MPs required to proceed as a candidate and has no government experience. | |||
] ] ruled himself out of both the leadership and deputy leadership contests and backed Gordon Brown for the leadership. Tony Blair is refusing to say who he will back in either contest. | |||
}} | |||
The media is increasingly focussing on leadership issues within the Party. ] faced pressure over marital affairs and friendship with Phillip Anschust. ] was under increasing pressure to name the date of his departure, although since the announcement that the 2006 TUC and Labour conferences would be his last as Prime Minister the demands for him to go imminently seem to have subsided. John Prescott confirmed that he would stand down as deputy leader at the same time as Tony Blair left Downing Street. This still leaves Prescott open to possible demands to bring it forward so that it would be on the same day as Tony Blair stands down as leader. Doing so would avoid having elections for leader and deputy leader on separate days which would increase costs. If they are on the same day, the voting forms and literature can go out to members in the same envelopes. | |||
== Bibliography == | |||
===Response to foreign policy issues=== | |||
{{Refbegin|30em}} | |||
It is thought that the ] incursions into the ] in August 2006 were carried out with the tacit support of ], as the government did not call for an immediate ceasefire. This has intensified calls for Blair's resignation and caused further internal disillusionment over the Party's direction. | |||
* {{cite book |last=Barlow |first=Keith |year=2008 |title=The Labour Movement in Britain from Thatcher to Blair |location=Frankfurt |publisher=Peter Lang |isbn=978-3-631-55137-0}} | |||
As of October 2006, '']'' has reported that many British citizens are unhappy with the Labour government's policies regarding ], ], the pensions crisis, treatment of ] workers, and government spending on education and health] to such little effect. However, the British economy has remained steady and this may mean that Labour seems likely to cling on to power, with or without ] support. | |||
* {{cite news |title=Scottish election 2021: The numbers behind the result |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-57047907 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210510084813/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-57047907 |archive-date=10 May 2021 |url-status=live |publisher=] |access-date=7 July 2024}} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Beech |first=Matt |year=2006 |title=The Political Philosophy of New Labour |series=International Library of Political Studies |volume=6 |location=London |publisher=Tauris Academic Studies |isbn=978-1-84511-041-3}} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Bell |first=Geoffrey |year=1982 |title=Troublesome Business: Labour Party and the Irish Question |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-86104-373-6 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/troublesomebusin0000bell}} | |||
* {{cite book |last1=Brivati |first1=Brian |author1-link=Brian Brivati |last2=Heffernan |first2=Richard |year=2000 |title=The Labour Party: A Centenary History |location=Basingstoke |publisher=Macmillan |isbn=978-0-312-23458-4}} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Budge |first=Ian |year=2008 |chapter=Great Britain and Ireland: Variations in Party Government |editor-last=Colomer |editor-first=Josep M. |editor-link=Josep Colomer |title=Comparative European Politics |edition=3rd |location=London |publisher=] |isbn=978-1-134-07354-2}} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Clark |first=Alistair |year=2012 |title=Political Parties in the UK |series=Contemporary Political Studies |location=Basingstoke |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-230-36868-2}} | |||
* {{cite book |last1=Crines |first1=Andrew Scott |year=2011 |title=Michael Foot and the Labour leadership |location=Newcastle upon Tyne |publisher=Cambridge Scholars |isbn=978-1-4438-3239-7}} | |||
* {{cite book |editor1-last=Daniels |editor1-first=Gary |editor2-last=McIlroy |editor2-first=John |year=2009 |title=Trade Unions in a Neoliberal World: British Trade Unions under New Labour |series=Routledge Research in Employment Relations |volume=20 |location=London |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-415-42663-3}} | |||
* Garnett, Mark, Gavin Hyman, and Richard Johnson. ''Keeping the Red Flag Flying: The Labour Party in Opposition Since 1922'' (John Wiley & Sons, 2024). | |||
* {{cite book |last=Hay |first=Colin |author-link=Colin Hay (political scientist) |year=2002 |title=British Politics Today |location=Cambridge |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-7456-2319-1 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/britishpoliticst0000unse}} | |||
* {{cite book |last1=Heath |first1=Anthony F. |author1-link=Anthony Heath |last2=Jowell |first2=Roger M. |author2-link=Roger Jowell |last3=Curtice |first3=John K. |author3-link=John Curtice |year=2001 |title=The Rise of New Labour: Party Policies and Voter Choices: Party Policies and Voter Choices |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-19-152964-1}} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Heppell |first=Timothy |year=2012 |chapter=Hugh Gaitskell, 1955–1963 | |||
|editor-last=Heppell |editor-first=Timothy |title=Leaders of the Opposition: From Churchill to Cameron |location=Basingstoke |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-230-29647-3}} | |||
* {{cite journal |last1=Hopkin |first1=Jonathan |author1-link=Jonathan Hopkin |last2=Wincott |first2=Daniel |author2-link=Daniel Wincott |year=2006 |title=New Labour, Economic Reform and the European Social Model |journal=] |volume=8 |issue=1 |pages=50–68 |doi=10.1111/j.1467-856X.2006.00227.x |issn=1467-856X |citeseerx=10.1.1.554.5779 |s2cid=32060486}} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Jessop |first=Bob |author-link=Bob Jessop |year=2004 |orig-year=2003 |chapter=From Thatcherism to New Labour: Neo-liberalism, Workfarism and Labour-market Regulation |editor-last=Overbeek |editor-first=Henk |title=The Political Economy of European Employment: European Integration and the Transnationalization of the (Un)employment Question |series=RIPE Series in Global Political Economy |location=London |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-203-01064-8 |citeseerx=10.1.1.460.4922}} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Jones |first=Tudor |year=1996 |title=Remaking the Labour Party: From Gaitskell to Blair |location=London |publisher=] |isbn=978-1-134-80132-9}} | |||
* {{cite journal |last=Kelliher |first=Diarmaid |year=2014 |title=Solidarity and Sexuality: Lesbians and Gays Support the Miners 1984–1985 |journal=] |volume=77 |issue=1 |pages=240–262 |doi=10.1093/hwj/dbt012 |s2cid=41955541 |issn=1477-4569 |url=http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/155165/1/155165.pdf |access-date=14 July 2019 |archive-date=22 July 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180722063532/http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/155165/1/155165.pdf |url-status=live}} | |||
* {{cite book |last1=Kenny |first1=Michael |last2=Smith |first2=Martin J. |year=2013 |orig-year=1997 |chapter=Discourses of Modernization: Gaitskell, Blair and Reform of Clause IV |editor1-last=Denver|editor1-first=David |editor2-last=Fisher |editor2-first=Justin |editor3-last=Ludlam |editor3-first=Steve|editor4-last=Pattie |editor4-first=Charles |title=British Elections and Parties Review |volume=7 |location=London |publisher=] |isbn=978-1-135-25578-7}} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Leach |first=Robert |year=2015 |title=Political Ideology in Britain |edition=3rd |location=London |publisher=] |isbn=978-1-137-33255-4}} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Lund |first=Brian |year=2006 |chapter=Distributive Justice and Social Policy|editor1-last=Lavalette |editor1-first=Michael |editor1-link=Michael Lavalette |editor2-last=Pratt|editor2-first=Alan |title=Social Policy: Theories, Concepts and Issues |edition=3rd |location=London |publisher=] |pages=107–123 |isbn=978-1-4129-0170-3}} | |||
* {{cite book |last=McAnulla |first=Stuart |year=2006 |title=British Politics: A Critical Introduction |location=London |publisher=Continuum International Publishing Group |isbn=978-0-8264-6156-8}} | |||
* {{cite book |last=McClintock |first=John |year=2010 |title=The Uniting of Nations: An Essay on Global Governance |edition=3rd |location=Brussels |publisher=Peter Lang |isbn=978-90-5201-588-0}} | |||
* {{cite book |last=McIlroy |first=John |year=2011 |chapter=Britain: How Neo-Liberalism Cut Unions Down to Size |editor1-last=Gall |editor1-first=Gregor |editor1-link=Gregor Gall |editor2-last=Wilkinson |editor2-first=Adrian |editor3-last=Hurd |editor3-first=Richard |editor3-link=Richard Hurd (educator) |title=The International Handbook of Labour Unions: Responses to Neo-Liberalism |location=Cheltenham |publisher=Edward Elgar Publishing |pages=82–104 |isbn=978-1-84844-862-9}} | |||
* {{cite book |last1=Merkel |first1=Wolfgang |last2=Petring |first2=Alexander |last3=Henkes |first3=Christian |last4=Egle |first4=Christoph |year=2008 |title=Social Democracy in Power: The Capacity to Reform |location=London |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-415-43820-9}} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Pugh |first=Martin |author-link=Martin Pugh (author) |year=2011 |orig-year=2010 |title=Speak for Britain! A New History of the Labour Party |location=London |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-09-952078-8 |title-link=Speak for Britain!}} | |||
* {{cite book |last1=Rentoul |first1=John |author1-link=John Rentoul |year=2001 |title=Tony Blair: Prime Minister |location=London |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-316-85496-2}} | |||
* {{cite journal |last1=Riddell |first1=Neil |year=1997 |title=The Catholic Church and the Labour Party, 1918–1931 |journal=Twentieth Century British History |volume=8 |issue=2 |pages=165–193 |doi=10.1093/tcbh/8.2.165 |issn=1477-4674}} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Shaw |first=Eric |year=1988 |title=Discipline and Discord in the Labour Party: The Politics of Managerial Control in the Labour Party, 1951–1987 |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-7190-2483-2}} | |||
* {{cite journal |last=Smith |first=Paul |year=2009 |title=New Labour and the Commonsense of Neoliberalism: Trade Unionism, Collective Bargaining and Workers' Rights |journal=] |volume=40 |issue=4 |pages=337–355 |doi=10.1111/j.1468-2338.2009.00531.x |s2cid=154993304 |issn=1472-9296}} | |||
* {{cite journal |last1=Smith |first1=Paul |last2=Morton |first2=Gary |year=2006 |title=Nine Years of New Labour: Neoliberalism and Workers' Rights |url=http://people.ds.cam.ac.uk/mb65/library/smith-and-morton-2006.pdf |journal=] |volume=44 |issue=3 |pages=401–420 |doi=10.1111/j.1467-8543.2006.00506.x |s2cid=155056617 |issn=1467-8543 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160726030838/http://people.ds.cam.ac.uk/mb65/library/smith-and-morton-2006.pdf |archive-date=26 July 2016 |access-date=26 July 2016}} | |||
* {{cite book |last1=Taylor |first1=A. J. P. |author1-link=A. J. P. Taylor |year=1965 |title=English History: 1914–1945 |location=Oxford |publisher=]}} | |||
* {{cite journal |last1=Thorpe |first1=Andrew |author1-link=Andrew Thorpe |year=1996 |title=The Industrial Meaning of 'Gradualism': The Labour Party and Industry, 1918–1931 |journal=] |volume=35 |issue=1 |pages=84–113 |jstor=175746 |issn=1545-6986 |doi=10.1086/386097 |hdl=10036/19512 |s2cid=155016569 |hdl-access=free}} | |||
* {{cite book |last1=Thorpe |first1=Andrew |author1-link=Andrew Thorpe |author1-mask=3 |year=2001 |title=A History of the British Labour Party |edition=2nd |location=Basingstoke |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-333-92908-7}} | |||
* {{cite book |last1=Thorpe |first1=Andrew |author1-link=Andrew Thorpe |author1-mask=3 |year=2008 |title=A History of the British Labour Party |edition=3rd |location=Basingstoke |publisher=] |isbn=978-1-137-11485-3}} | |||
* {{cite book |last1=Wright |first1=Tony |author1-link=Tony Wright (Cannock Chase MP) |last2=Carter |first2=Matt |author2-link=Matt Carter (politician) |year=1997 |title=The People's Party: The History of the Labour Party |location=London |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-500-27956-4}} | |||
{{Refend}} | |||
== Further reading == | |||
===The bid for a fourth successive Labour victory=== | |||
{{refbegin|30em}} | |||
If the pattern of recent elections is followed, the ] will be held around June 2009, probably on European Elections Day, with the Local Elections most likely moved to be on the same day. | |||
* Bassett, Lewis. "Corbynism: Social democracy in a new left garb." '']'' 90.4 (2019): 777–784 {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230205001645/https://www.academia.edu/40317267/Corbynism_Social_Democracy_in_a_New_Left_Garb |date=5 February 2023 }} | |||
* Brivati, Brian, and Richard Heffernan, eds. ''The Labour Party: A Centenary History'' (2000) {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221123184636/https://link.springer.com/book/10.1057/9780230595583 |date=23 November 2022 }}, 27 chapters by experts | |||
* Davies, A. J. ''To Build a New Jerusalem: Labour Movement from the 1890s to the 1990s'' (1996). | |||
* Driver, Stephen; and Luke Martell. ''New Labour: Politics after Thatcherism'' (], wnd ed. 2006). | |||
* Foote, Geoffrey. ''The Labour Party's Political Thought: A History'' (Macmillan, 1997). | |||
* Harris, Kenneth. ''Attlee'' (1982) | |||
* Kavanagh, Dennis. ''The Politics of the Labour Party'' (Routledge, 2013). | |||
* Morgan, Kenneth O. ''Labour People: Leaders and Lieutenants, Hardie to Kinnock'' (Oxford UP, 1992), scholarly biographies of 30 key leaders. | |||
* Morgan, Kenneth O. "United Kingdom: A Comparative Case Study of Labour Prime Ministers Attlee, Wilson, Callaghan and Blair" ''The Journal of Legislative Studies'' 10.2-3 (2004): 38–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/135723304200032220 | |||
* Pelling, Henry; and Alastair J. Reid. '' A Short History of the Labour Party'' (12th ed. 2005) | |||
* Pimlott, Ben, and Chris Cook, eds. ''Trade unions in British politics: the first 250 years'' (2nd ed. Longman, 1991) | |||
* Plant, Raymond, Matt Beech and Kevin Hickson, eds. ''The Struggle for Labour's Soul: understanding Labour's political thought since 1945'' (2004) | |||
* Rogers, Chris. "'Hang on a Minute, I've Got a Great Idea': From the Third Way to Mutual Advantage in the Political Economy of the British Labour Party." ''British Journal of Politics and International Relations'' 15#1 (2013): 53–69. | |||
* Rosen, Greg, ed. ''Dictionary of Labour Biography''. (Politicos Publishing, 2001), 665pp; 300 short biographies by experts. | |||
* Rosen, Greg. ''Old Labour to New'', ], 2005. | |||
* Seaman, L. C. B. ''Post-Victorian Britain: 1902-1951'' (1966) | |||
* Shaw, Eric. ''The Labour Party since 1979: Crisis and Transformation'' (Routledge, 1994). | |||
* Shaw, Eric. "Understanding Labour Party Management under Tony Blair." ''Political Studies Review'' 14.2 (2016): 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929915623296 | |||
* Taylor, Robert. ''The Parliamentary Labour Party: A History 1906–2006'' (2007). | |||
* Timmins, Nicholas. ''The five giants: a biography of the welfare state'' (2nd ed. 2001) | |||
{{refend}} | |||
== External links == | |||
==Leaders of the Labour Party since 1906== | |||
{{Commons category}} | |||
* {{Official website}} | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* —held at the ] | |||
{{Labour Party (UK)}} | |||
17th February 1906 James Keir Hardie, b. 15th August 1856, d. 26th September 1915 | |||
{{Political parties in the United Kingdom}} | |||
{{Party of European Socialists}} | |||
{{Portal bar|Politics|United Kingdom|Organised labour|Socialism}}{{Authority control}} | |||
] | |||
22nd January 1908 Arthur Henderson, b. 13th September 1863, d. 20th October 1935 | |||
] | |||
] | |||
14th February 1910 George Nicoll Barnes, b. 2nd January 1859, d. 21st April 1940 | |||
] | |||
] | |||
6th February 1911 James Ramsay Macdonald, b. 12th October 1866, d. 9th November 1937 | |||
] | |||
5th August 1914 Arthur Henderson,(see above) | |||
24th October 1917 William Adamson, b. 2nd April 1863, d. 23rd February 1936 | |||
14th February 1921 John Robert Clynes,b. 27th March 1869, d. 23rd October 1949 | |||
21st November 1922 James Ramsay Macdonald, (see above) | |||
1st September 1931 Arthur Henderson, (see above) | |||
25th October 1932 George Lansbury, b. 21st February 1859, d. 7th May 1940 | |||
8th October 1935 Clement Richard Attlee, b. 3rd January 1883, d. 8th October 1967 | |||
14th December 1955 Hugh Todd Naylor Gaitskell, b. 9th April 1906, d. 18th January 1963 | |||
14th February 1963 James Harold Wilson, b. 11th March 1916, d. 24th May 1995 | |||
5th April 1976 Leonard James Callaghan, b. 27th March 1912 | |||
3rd November 1980 Michael Mackintosh Foot, b. 23rd July 1913 | |||
2nd October 1983 Neil Gordon Kinnock, b. 28th March 1942 | |||
18th July 1992 John Smith, b. 13th September 1938, d. 12th May 1994 | |||
21st July 1994 Anthony Charles Lynton Blair, b. 6th May 1953 | |||
==Deputy leaders of the Labour Party since 1922== | |||
* ] 1922–1931 | |||
* Jointly ] 1931–1932 and ] 1931–1932 (died in office) | |||
* ] 1932–1935 | |||
* ] 1935–1945 | |||
* ] 1945–1955 | |||
* ] 1955–1959 | |||
* ] 1959–1960 (died in office) | |||
* ] 1960–1970 | |||
* ] 1970–1972 | |||
* ] 1972–1976 | |||
* ] 1976–1980 | |||
* ] 1980–1983 | |||
* ] 1983–1992 | |||
* ] 1992–1994 | |||
* ] 1994–present. | |||
==See also== | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
==References== | |||
<div class="references-small"> | |||
<references /> | |||
</div> | |||
==Further reading== | |||
<div class="references-small"> | |||
* Raymond Plant, Matt Beech and Kevin Hickson (2004), ''The Struggle for Labour's Soul: understanding Labour's political thought since 1945'', Routledge | |||
* ], '']'', ], 2004, | |||
</div> | |||
==External links== | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
==Other British political parties== | |||
{{British_political_parties}} | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 22:16, 21 December 2024
Political party in the United Kingdom‹ The template Infobox political party is being considered for merging. ›
The Labour Party is a political party in the United Kingdom that sits on the centre-left of the political spectrum. The party has been described as an alliance of social democrats, democratic socialists and trade unionists. It is one of two dominant political parties in the United Kingdom, along with the Conservative Party. The party has been led by Keir Starmer since 2020, who became Prime Minister of the United Kingdom in July 2024. Since the 2024 general election, the Labour Party has been the governing party of the United Kingdom and the largest political party in the House of Commons, followed by the Conservative Party and the Liberal Democrats. As of 2024, there have been seven Labour prime ministers and fourteen Labour ministries. The party traditionally holds the annual Labour Party Conference during party conference season, at which debates and voting take place, and senior Labour figures promote party policy.
The Labour Party was founded in 1900, having emerged from the trade union movement and socialist parties of the 19th century. It was electorally weak before the First World War, but in the early 1920s overtook the Liberal Party to become the main opposition to the Conservative Party, and briefly formed a minority government under Ramsay MacDonald in 1924. In 1929, Labour for the first time became the largest party in the House of Commons with 287 seats, but fell short of a majority, forming another minority government. In 1931, in response to the Great Depression, MacDonald formed a new government with Conservative and Liberal support, which led to his expulsion from the party. Labour was soundly defeated by his coalition in the 1931 election, winning only 52 seats, but began to recover in 1935, with 154 seats.
During the Second World War, Labour served in the wartime coalition, after which it won a majority in the 1945 election. Clement Attlee's government enacted extensive nationalisation and established the modern welfare state and National Health Service before losing power in 1951. Under Harold Wilson and James Callaghan, Labour again governed from 1964 to 1970 and from 1974 to 1979. The party then entered a period of intense internal division which ended in the defeat of its left wing by the mid-1980s. After electoral defeats to the Conservatives in 1987 and 1992, Tony Blair took the party to the political centre as part of his New Labour project, which governed under Blair and then Gordon Brown from 1997 to 2010. After further electoral defeats in the 2010s, Keir Starmer again moved Labour to the political centre from 2020 and has governed since 2024.
Labour is the largest party in the Senedd (Welsh Parliament), being the only party in the current Welsh government. Labour is a member of the Party of European Socialists and the Progressive Alliance, and holds observer status in the Socialist International. The party includes semi-autonomous London, Scottish, Welsh and Northern Irish branches; it supports the Social Democratic and Labour Party (SDLP) in Northern Ireland, while still organising there. As of March 2024, Labour has 366,604 registered members.
History
Main articles: History of the Labour Party (UK) and History of the socialist movement in the United KingdomOrigins to 1890s
The origins of what became the Labour Party emerged in the late 19th century. It represented the interests of the labour unions and more generally the growing urban working class. Hundreds of thousands of workers had recently gained voting rights by laws passed in 1867 and 1884. Many different trade unions flourished in the industrial districts. Their leaders used the Methodist revival tradition to find ways to rally the membership. Several small socialist organizations formed and wanted power based on the working class; the most influential was the Fabian Society, which was made up of middle class reformers. Keir Hardie worked for cooperation among the unions and left-wing groups such as his small Independent Labour Party (ILP).
Labour Representation Committee (1900–1906)
Main article: Labour Representation Committee (1900)The Labour Party was formed by unions and left-wing groups to create a distinct political voice for the working class in Britain. In 1900 the Trades Union Congress (TUC), an umbrella body for most unions, sponsored a national conference to unite into a single party that would sponsor candidates for the House of Commons. The conference created the Labour Representation Committee (LRC), as a coalition of separate groups with Ramsay MacDonald as secretary. The fearsome issue for labour was the 1901 Taff Vale legal decision which made most strikes illegal; the urgent goal was to get Parliament to reverse it. The LRC cut a secret deal with the Liberal Party: they would not compete against each other in the 1906 general election. Voters gave the Liberals a landslide with 397 seats out of 664; the new LRC won 29 seats. The LRC renamed itself "The Labour Party", with veteran MP Keir Hardie narrowly winning the role of leader of the Parliamentary Labour Party (PLP).
Early years (1906–1923)
The Labour Party's first national conference in Belfast in 1907 helped shape many of its key policies. Never fully resolved was the puzzle of where the final decisions ought to lie—in the annual conference? the Parliamentary Labour Party (PLP)? The local chapters? The Trade Union Congress (which brought together the heads of most unions)? The conference created a "conscience clause" allowing diversity of opinions rather than a rigid orthodoxy. Irish politics proved to be so different that the Party simply quit Ireland and worked only in England, Scotland and Wales. In 1908–1910 the Party supported the momentous and largely successful Liberal battles in favor of a welfare state and against the Unionist/Conservative Party and against the veto power of the House of Lords. Growth continued, with 42 Labour MPs elected to the House of Commons in the December 1910 general election. During World War I, the party experienced internal divisions over support for the war effort, but also saw one of its top leaders Arthur Henderson, serve in the powerful war cabinet.
After the war, the party focused on building a strong constituency-based support network and adopted a comprehensive statement of policies titled "Labour and the New Social Order". In 1918, Clause IV was added to Labour's constitution, committing the party to work towards common ownership of the means of production, distribution, and exchange. Socialism was vaguely promised, but there was no effort made to draw up detailed plans on what that would mean or how it could be accomplished.
The Representation of the People Act 1918 greatly expanded the electorate, enfranchising all men and most women. The party concentrated its appeal on the new electorate with considerable success among working men, but far less success among women. As the Liberal Party collapsed, Labour became the official opposition to the Conservative government. Its support for the war effort demonstrated that the Labour Party was a patriotic and moderate force that solved problems and did not threaten class warfare.
Labour forms a government (1923–1924)
Main article: First MacDonald ministryThe 1923 election was a pivotal achievement with the formation of the first Labour government. The Conservatives called for high tariffs. Labour and Liberals both wanted free trade. Labour leader Ramsay MacDonald formed a minority government with Liberal support that lasted 10 months. The only domestic achievement was the Wheatley Housing Act, which expanded the large-scale public housing program that started in 1919 with support from all three major parties. MacDonald was much more successful in foreign policy. He helped end the impasse over German payment of reparations by enlisting Washington to launch the Dawes Plan. Much more controversial was his decision to recognize the Soviet Union. That ignited an anti-Communist backlash that exploded four days before the 1924 election in the fake Zinoviev Letter in which Kremlin supposedly called for revolutionary uprising by British workers. The 1924 election saw the Conservatives return to power, benefiting from the Zinoviev letter and the continuing collapse of the Liberal vote. The Labour share of the popular vote went up, but it lost seats. Above all the moderation of the Macdonald government put to rest the lingering fears that a Labour victory would produce a violent class war.
The failed general strike (1926–1929)
In 1925–26, coal sales fell and the mining companies demanded an increase in hours and a cut in wages. The miners were totally opposed and planned a strike. The TUC coalition of unions decided it would support the miners by a nationwide general strike that would paralyze most of the national economy. A strike was postponed when the Conservative government offered a subsidy for wages, but it also prepared to deal with the threatened general strike. Meanwhile, the TUC failed to make preparations. It ignored the Labour Party in and out of Parliament and in turn party leaders opposed a national strike. The 1926 general strike failed after 9 days as the government plan devised by Winston Churchill proved highly effective in keeping the economy open while minimizing violence. In the long run, however, the episode tended to strengthen working class support for Labour, and it gained in the 1929 general election, forming a second government with Liberal help.
Second Labour Ministry in 1929 and failures in 1930s
Main article: Second MacDonald ministryOnce again with Liberal help, MacDonald became prime minister following the successful 1929 election. There were some promising achievements in foreign policy, notably the Young Plan that seemed to resolve the issue of German reparations, and the London Naval Treaty of 1930 that limited submarine construction. Some minor legislation was passed, notably a noncontroversial expansion of new public housing. Overnight in October 1929 the world economy plunged into the Great Depression, and no party had an answer as tax revenue plunged, unemployment doubled to 2.5 million (in late 1930), prices fell, and government spending on unemployment benefits soared. Conditions became much worse in 1931 as the banks became unable to loan the government enough to cover the growing deficit. In an era before Keynesian economics, the strong consensus among experts was for the government to balance its budget.
Spending was cut again and again but MacDonald and his Chancellor of the Exchequer Philip Snowden argued that the only way to get an emergency loan from New York banks was to cut unemployment benefits by 10%. They pointed out that cost of food was down 15% and overall prices were down 10%. But in the cabinet most Labour members were vehemently opposed—they demanded new taxes on the rich instead. MacDonald gave up and on 23 August went to King George V and resigned the government. Unexpectedly the monarch insisted that the only patriotic solution was for MacDonald to stay and form an all-party "national government" with the Conservatives, which he did the next day. The Labour Party felt betrayed and expelled MacDonald and Snowden. The new National Government, 1931–1935 kept Macdonald and Snowden and two others, replacing the rest of the Laborites with Conservatives. The 1931 election took place on 27 October. Labour had 6.3 million votes (31 percent), down from 8.0 million and 37 percent in 1929. Nevertheless, it was reduced to a helpless minority of only 52 members, chiefly from coal mining districts. The old leadership was gone. One bright note came in 1934 when Herbert Morrison led Labour to take control of the London County Council for the first time ever.
In the 1935 election, Labour recovered to 8.0 million votes (38 percent), and Clement Attlee became Minority Leader. The Party now had 154 seats but had minimal influence in Parliament. At the local level union leaders, led by Ernest Bevin, successfully defeated Communist infiltration. In foreign policy a strong pacifist element made it slow to support the government's rearmament program. As the threat from Nazi Germany escalated, the Party gradually abandoned its pacifist stance and came to support re-armament, largely due to the efforts of Bevin and Hugh Dalton. By 1937 they had persuaded the Party to oppose Neville Chamberlain's policy of appeasement of Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy. However, as late as April 1939 the Party strongly opposed conscription for the Army.
Wartime coalition (1940–1945)
See also: Churchill war ministryThe party returned to power in May 1940, with about a third of the seats in the wartime coalition government under Churchill. Attlee was given a new position as Deputy Prime Minister. He was in charge of the cabinet when Churchill was absent, and handled domestic affairs, working closely with Bevin as Minister of Labour. The war set in motion profound demands for reform. This mood was epitomised in the Beveridge Report of 1942, by the Liberal economist William Beveridge. The Report assumed that the maintenance of full employment would be the aim of post-war governments, and that this would provide the basis for the welfare state. Immediately upon its release, it sold hundreds of thousands of copies. All major parties committed themselves to fulfilling this aim, but the Labour Party was seen by the electorate as the party most likely to follow it through.
Attlee government (1945–1951)
Main article: Attlee ministryWith the victory in Europe, the coalition broke up in May 1945. The 1945 general election gave Labour a landslide victory, as they won 12 million votes (50% of the total) and 393 seats. The Labour government proved the most radical in British history. It presided over a policy of nationalising major industries and utilities including the Bank of England, coal mining, the steel industry, electricity, gas and inland transport (including railways, road haulage and canals). It developed and implemented the "cradle to grave" welfare state. It created the National Health Service (NHS), which gave publicly funded medical treatment for all.
Nationalisation primarily affected weak and poorly managed industries, opening the hope that centralized planning would reverse the decline. Iron and steel, however, were already well-run and nationalization was denounced and later reversed by the Conservatives.
The economy was precarious during the age of austerity, as wartime restrictions and rationing continued, and the wartime bombing damage was slowly being rebuilt at great cost. The Treasury depended heavily on American money, especially the 1946 loan of $3.75 billion at a low 2% interest rate, and the gift of $2.694 billion in Marshall Plan funds. Canada also provided gifts and $1.25 billion in loans.
The government began the process of dismantling the British Empire, starting with independence to India and Pakistan in 1947, followed by Burma (Myanmar) and Ceylon (Sri Lanka) the following year. It relinquished its control over Palestine to the United Nations in 1948. Elsewhere independence movements were much weaker and London's policy was to keep the Empire in business.
Under Ernest Bevin's leadership, London pushed Washington into an anti-Communist coalition that launched the Cold War in 1947 and established the NATO military alliance against the USSR in 1949. Furthermore, independent of Washington London committed large sums to developing a secret nuclear weapons programme.
In the 1951 general election, Labour narrowly lost to Churchill's Conservatives, despite receiving the larger share of the popular vote. Its 13.9 million vote total was the highest ever. Most of its innovation were accepted by the Conservatives and Liberals and became part of the "post-war consensus" that lasted until the Thatcher era of the 1980s.
Internal feuds (1951–1964)
Labour spent 13 years in opposition. It suffered an ideological split, between the left-wing followers of Aneurin Bevan (known as Bevanites) and the right-wing following Hugh Gaitskell (known as Gaitskellites). The economy recovered as Conservatives hung together and chanted, "You Never Had It So Good.". The ageing Attlee contested the general election in 1955, which saw Labour lose ground; he retired and was replaced by Gaitskell. Internal squabbling now focused on the issues of nuclear disarmament, Britain's entry into the European Economic Community (EEC), and Clause IV of the Labour Party Constitution, with its commitment to nationalisation. Gaitskell led Labour to a third consecutive defeat at the 1959 general election despite the party appearing more united than it had been for some time. Gaitskell responded by attempting to remove Clause IV (the nationalisation clause) from the party constitution, but this was unsuccessful. Gaitskell died suddenly in 1963, and cleared the way for Harold Wilson to lead the party.
Wilson as leader (1964–1974)
Main article: Labour government, 1964–1970A downturn in the economy and a series of scandals in the early 1960s had engulfed the Conservative government by 1963. The Labour Party returned to government with a 4-seat majority under Wilson in the 1964 general election but a landslide increased its majority to 96 in the 1966 general election.
Labour was responsible for a number of sweeping social and cultural reforms mostly under the leadership of Home Secretary Roy Jenkins such as the abolition of the death penalty; the legalisation of abortion; loosening restrictions on homosexuality, the abolition of theatre censorship, and legislation to outlaw racial discrimination
The government put heavy emphasis on expanding opportunities through education: Comprehensive education was expanded at the secondary level and the Open University created for adults.
Wilson's first period as Prime Minister coincided with a period of relatively low unemployment and economic prosperity, it was however hindered by significant problems with a large trade deficit which it had inherited from the previous government. The first three years of the government were spent in an ultimately doomed attempt to stave off the continued devaluation of the pound. Labour went on to unexpectedly lose the 1970 general election to the Conservatives under Edward Heath. Labour in opposition kept Wilson as Leader. The 1970s proved a difficult time to be in government for both the Conservatives and Labour due to the 1973 oil crisis, which caused high inflation and a global recession. The Labour Party was returned to power again under Wilson a few days after the February 1974 general election, forming a minority government with the support of the Ulster Unionists. In a bid to gain a majority, Prime Minister Wilson soon called an election for October 1974. Labour won a slim majority of three, gaining 18 seats taking its total to 319.
Majority to minority (1974–1979)
Main article: Labour government, 1974–1979In March 1974 Wilson was appointed prime minister for a second time; he called a snap election in October 1974, which gave Labour a small majority. During his second term as prime minister, Wilson oversaw the referendum that confirmed the UK's membership of the European Communities.
When Wilson suddenly announced his retirement in March 1976, Callaghan defeated five other candidates to be elected Leader of the Labour Party; he was appointed prime minister on 5 April 1976. By now Labour had lost its narrow majority. To stay in power Callaghan made a confidence and supply agreement with the Liberal Party. While this initially proved stable, it could not survive in the face of major industrial disputes and widespread strikes in the 1978–79 "Winter of Discontent", as well as the defeat of the referendum on devolution for Scotland. Minor parties joined the Conservatives to pass a motion of no-confidence in Callaghan on 28 March 1979. Callaghan led Labour to defeat at the 1979 election and was replaced by Conservative Margaret Thatcher. The 1979 defeat marked the beginning of 18 years in opposition for the Labour Party, the longest in its history. According to historian Kenneth O. Morgan, the fall of Callaghan meant the passing of an old obsolete system, as well as the end of corporatism, Keynesian spending programmes, subsidised welfare payments, and labour union power.
Thatcherism and Labour's civil war (1979–1992)
See also: Shadow Cabinet of Michael Foot, Shadow Cabinet of Neil Kinnock, and Social Democratic Party (UK)Following 1979 the Labour Party found itself overwhelmed by the Conservative government led by a highly aggressive Margaret Thatcher. From the right she largely rejected the Post-war consensus on economic and social policies that had bipartisan support since the 1950s. At first Thatcher's economic reforms were doing poorly. Argentina's invasion of a British possession in the Falklands War in Spring 1982 transformed British politics. Thatcher's aggressive reaction produced a smashing victory and national elation, guaranteeing Conservatives a massive landslide victory in the 1983 general election. Thatcher's successful attacks on labour unions in 1984–1985 further weakened the Labour base. It took a decade for Labour to recover.
Labour's inward turn flared into a civil war between left and right. The party came under the control of young middle-class left-wing activists in the local constituencies. The left was led by Michael Foot and Tony Benn. They were keen on radical proposals as presented in the 1983 manifesto entitled "The New Hope for Britain". It called for extensive nationalisation of industry, with heavily centralized economic planning, and many additional controls on business. It demanded unilateral nuclear disarmament and withdrawal from the European Community. Labour's manifesto was a repudiation of the Post-war consensus from the left. It alienated so many moderates, skilled workers and the general public that it was ridiculed as the "longest suicide note in history." Some top leaders quit the Labour Party and formed a new Social Democratic Party, but it could not survive. After Labour's massive defeat in the 1983 General Election, Neil Kinnock replaced Foot. He defeated the left wing, reversed the highly controversial Manifesto proposals, expelled extremist factions like the Trotskyist Militant tendency, and began a process of modernization and acceptance of many Thatcherite innovations.
Modernisers take charge (1992–1997)
In November 1990, Thatcher resigned and was succeeded by the less confrontational Thatcherite John Major. Opinion polls had shown Labour comfortably ahead of the Conservatives largely because of Thatcher's introduction of the highly unpopular poll tax, combined with the fact that the economy was sliding into recession. Major replaced the poll tax but Kinnock energized Labour with the theme "It's Time for a Change", after more than a decade of unbroken Conservative rule. The 1992 general election gave Conservatives a victory with a much-reduced majority of 21. It was a deeply disappointing result for Labour. For the first time in over 30 years there was serious doubt among the public and the media as to whether Labour could ever return to government. Kinnock resigned as leader and was succeeded by John Smith.
The damage to the economy on Black Wednesday in September 1992 undermined the Conservative reputation for superior economic competence. By December, Labour had a comfortable lead in the opinion polls. The recession ended in early 1993 and was followed by a sharp fall in unemployment, together with sustained economic growth. Nevertheless, the Labour lead in the polls remained strong. Smith died suddenly in May 1994, and Tony Blair became leader.
Once again the battle resumed between the old guard on the left and the younger "modernisers". The old guard argued that they were regaining strength under Smith's strong leadership. Blair, the leader of the modernisers, warned that the long-term weaknesses had to be reversed. He argued that the party was too locked into a base that was shrinking, since it was based on the working-class, on trade unions and on residents of subsidised council housing. Blair said that the rapidly growing middle class was largely ignored, as well as more ambitious working-class families. He argued that they aspired to become middle-class and accepted the Conservative argument that traditional Labour was holding ambitious people back with higher tax policies. To present a fresh face and new policies to the electorate, New Labour needed more than fresh leaders; it had to jettison outdated policies, argued the modernisers. Calling on the slogan, "One Member, One Vote" Blair defeated the union element and ended block voting by leaders of labour unions. Blair and the modernisers called for radical adjustment of Party goals by repealing "Clause IV", the historic commitment to nationalisation of industry. This was achieved in 1995.
New Labour (1994–2010)
Main article: New Labour See also: Premiership of Tony Blair and Premiership of Gordon Brown Further information: Shadow Cabinet of Tony Blair, First Blair ministry, Second Blair ministry, Third Blair ministry, and Brown ministryBlair continued to move the party further to the centre, abandoning the largely symbolic Clause Four at the 1995 mini-conference in a strategy to increase the party's appeal to "middle England". The political philosophy of New Labour was influenced by the party's development of Anthony Giddens' Third Way which attempted to provide a synthesis between capitalism and socialism.
New Labour was first termed as an alternative branding for the Labour Party, dating from a conference slogan first used by the Labour Party in 1994, which was later seen in a draft manifesto published by the party in 1996, called New Labour, New Life For Britain. It was a continuation of the trend that had begun under the leadership of Neil Kinnock. New Labour as a name has no official status, but remains in common use to distinguish modernisers from those holding to more traditional positions, normally referred to as "Old Labour".
New Labour is a party of ideas and ideals but not of outdated ideology. What counts is what works. The objectives are radical. The means will be modern.
The Labour Party won the 1997 general election in a landslide victory with a parliamentary majority of 179; it was the largest ever Labour majority, and at the time the largest swing to a political party achieved since 1945. Over the next decade, a wide range of progressive social reforms were enacted, with millions lifted out of poverty during Labour's time in office largely as a result of various tax and benefit reforms.
Among the early acts of Blair's government were the establishment of the national minimum wage, the devolution of power to Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, major changes to the regulation of the banking system and the re-creation of a citywide government body for London, the Greater London Authority, with its own elected-Mayor. Combined with a Conservative opposition that had yet to organise effectively under William Hague, and the continuing popularity of Blair, Labour went on to win the 2001 election with a similar majority, dubbed the "quiet landslide" by the media. In 2003 Labour introduced tax credits, government top-ups to the pay of low-wage workers.
A perceived turning point was when Blair controversially allied himself with US President George W. Bush in supporting the Iraq War, which caused him to lose much of his political support. The UN Secretary-General, among many, considered the war illegal and a violation of the UN Charter. The Iraq War was deeply unpopular in most western countries, with Western governments divided in their support and under pressure from worldwide popular protests. The decisions that led up to the Iraq war and its subsequent conduct were the subject of the Iraq Inquiry.
In the 2005 general election, Labour was re-elected for a third term, but with a reduced majority of 66 and popular vote of only 35.2%. Blair announced in September 2006 that he would step down as leader within the year, though he had been under pressure to quit earlier than May 2007 in order to get a new leader in place before the May elections which were expected to be disastrous for Labour. In the event, the party did lose power in Scotland to a minority Scottish National Party government at the 2007 elections and, shortly after this, Blair resigned as Prime Minister and was replaced by the Chancellor, Gordon Brown. Brown coordinated the UK's response to the 2007–2008 financial crisis. Membership of the party also reached a low falling to 156,205 by the end of 2009: over 40 per cent of the 405,000 peak reached in 1997 and thought to be the lowest total since the party was founded.
In the 2010 general election on 6 May that year, Labour with 29.0% of the vote won the second largest number of seats (258). The Conservatives with 36.5% of the vote won the largest number of seats (307), but no party had an overall majority, meaning that Labour could still remain in power if they managed to form a coalition with at least one smaller party. However, the Labour Party would have had to form a coalition with more than one other smaller party to gain an overall majority; anything less would result in a minority government. On 10 May 2010, after talks to form a coalition with the Liberal Democrats broke down, Brown announced his intention to stand down as Leader before the Labour Party Conference but a day later resigned as both Prime Minister and party leader.
Opposition (2010–2024)
See also: Labour Party leadership of Ed Miliband and Labour Party leadership of Jeremy Corbyn Further information: Shadow Cabinet of Ed Miliband and Shadow Cabinet of Jeremy CorbynEd Miliband won the subsequent leadership election. Miliband emphasised "responsible capitalism" and greater state intervention to rebalance the economy away from financial services. He advocated for more regulation of banks and energy companies and often addressed the need to challenge vested interests and increase inclusivity in British society. He adopted the "One Nation Labour" branding in 2012. The Parliamentary Labour Party voted to abolish Shadow Cabinet elections in 2011, ratified by the National Executive Committee and Party Conference. Henceforth the leader of the party chose the Shadow Cabinet members.
In March 2014, the party reformed internal election procedures, including replacing the electoral college system with "one member, one vote". Mass membership was encouraged by creating a class of "registered supporters" as an alternative to full membership. Trade union members would also have to explicitly opt in rather than opt out of paying a political levy to the party.
In September 2014, Labour outlined plans to cut the government's current account deficit and balance the budget by 2020, excluding investment. The party carried these plans into the 2015 general election, which Labour lost. Its representation fell to 232 seats in the House of Commons. The party lost 40 of its 41 seats in Scotland to the Scottish National Party.
After the 2015 general election, Miliband resigned as party leader and Harriet Harman again became interim leader. Labour held a leadership election in which Jeremy Corbyn, then a member of the Socialist Campaign Group, was considered a fringe candidate when the contest began, receiving nominations from just 36 MPs, one more than the minimum required to stand, and the support of just 16 MPs. The Labour Party saw a flood of membership applications during the leadership election, with most of the new members thought to be Corbyn supporters. Corbyn was elected leader with 60% of the vote. Membership continued to climb after his victory; one year later it had grown to more than 500,000, making it the largest political party in Western Europe.
Tensions soon developed in the parliamentary party over Corbyn's leadership, particularly after the 2016 Brexit referendum. Many in the party were angered that Corbyn did not campaign strongly against Brexit; he had been only a "lukewarm" supporter of remaining in the European Union and refused to join David Cameron in campaigning for the Remain side. 21 members of the Shadow Cabinet resigned after the referendum. Corbyn lost a no-confidence vote among Labour MPs by 172–40, triggering a leadership election, which he won decisively with 62% support among Labour party members.
In April 2017, Prime Minister Theresa May called a snap election for June 2017. Corbyn resisted pressure from within the Labour Party to call for a referendum on the eventual Brexit deal, instead focusing on healthcare, education and ending austerity. Although Labour started the campaign as far as 20 points behind, it defied expectations by gaining 40% of the vote, its greatest share since 2001 and the biggest increase in vote share in a single general election since 1945. The party gained a net 30 seats with the Conservatives losing their overall majority.
From 2016, the Labour Party faced criticism for failing to deal with antisemitism. Criticism was also levelled at Corbyn. The Chakrabarti Inquiry cleared the party of widespread antisemitism, but identified an "occasionally toxic atmosphere". High-profile party members, including Ken Livingstone, Peter Willsman and Chris Williamson, left the party or were suspended over antisemitism-related incidents. In 2018, internal divisions emerged over adopting the IHRA Working Definition of Antisemitism, with those opposed arguing the definition limits free speech including criticism of the state of Israel. 68 rabbis criticised the leadership for its stance. The issue was cited by a number of Labour MPs who left the party to create Change UK, a new political party made up of ex-Conservative and ex-Labour MPs.
In the 2019 general election, Labour campaigned on a manifesto widely considered the most radical in decades, more closely resembling Labour's politics of the 1970s than subsequent decades. These included plans to nationalise the country's biggest energy firms, the National Grid, the water industry, Royal Mail, the railways and the broadband arm of BT. The election saw Labour win its lowest number of seats since 1935. Following Labour's defeat in the 2019 general election Corbyn announced that he would stand down as leader.
In 2020, a report by the Equalities and Human Rights Commission found the party responsible for three Equality Act breaches, including harassment and political interference in antisemitism complaints, but did not directly implicate Corbyn. In response, Corbyn said “One antisemite is one too many, but the scale of the problem was also dramatically overstated for political reasons by our opponents inside and outside the party, as well as by much of the media.” The Forde Report concluded allegations of antisemitism were weaponised by opponents of Corbyn and that hostility towards Corbyn inside the party from his opponents contributed to the party’s ineffective handling of antisemitism complaints and undermined the party’s leader and election campaigns.
Return to government (2024–present)
Main articles: Premiership of Keir Starmer and Starmer ministryOn 4 April 2020, Keir Starmer was elected as Leader of the Labour Party amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. During his tenure as opposition leader, Starmer repositioned the party from the left toward the political centre, and emphasised the importance of eliminating antisemitism within the party. Starmer led Labour to victory in the local elections in 2023 and 2024. In 2023, Starmer set out five missions for his government, targeting issues such as economic growth, health, clean energy, crime and education.
During the 2024 general election, Labour maintained a strong poll lead, with its manifesto focusing on economic growth, planning system reform, infrastructure, clean energy, healthcare, education, childcare, constitutional reform, and strengthening workers' rights. It pledged a new publicly owned energy company to achieve net zero emissions by 2030, a "Green Prosperity Plan", reducing patient waiting times and "rebuilding the NHS", reforming public services, and public ownership of the railway network and local bus services. The manifesto also pledged to give votes to 16 year olds, reform the House of Lords, and to tax private schools, with money generated going into improving state education.
Starmer led Labour to a landslide victory with a majority of 174, with a popular vote share of 33.7%, ending fourteen years of Conservative government with Labour becoming the largest party in the House of Commons. He succeeded Rishi Sunak as prime minister on 5 July 2024, becoming the first Labour prime minister since Gordon Brown in 2010 and the first one to win a general election since Tony Blair in 2005. One of Starmer's first cabinet appointments was Rachel Reeves as Chancellor, which made her the first woman to hold the office. The 2024 State Opening of Parliament outlined 39 pieces of legislation that Labour proposed, including bills to renationalise the railways, strengthen the rights of workers, and to give areas of England devolution powers.
Ideology
Labour sits on the centre-left of the political spectrum. It was formed to provide political representation for the trade union movement in Parliament. The Labour Party gained a socialist commitment with the party constitution of 1918, Clause IV of which called for the "common ownership", or nationalisation, of the "means of production, distribution and exchange". Although about a third of British industry was taken into public ownership after the Second World War and remained so until the 1980s, the right of the party was questioning the validity of expanding on this by the late 1950s. Influenced by Anthony Crosland's book The Future of Socialism (1956), the circle around party leader Hugh Gaitskell felt that the commitment was no longer necessary. An attempt to remove Clause IV from the party constitution in 1959 failed; Tony Blair and New Labour "modernisers" were successful in removing Clause IV in 1994.
Historically influenced by Keynesian economics, the party favoured government intervention in the economy and the redistribution of wealth. Taxation was seen as a means to achieve a "major redistribution of wealth and income" in the October 1974 election manifesto. The party also desired increased rights for workers and a welfare state, including publicly funded healthcare. From the late-1980s onwards, the party adopted free market policies, leading many observers to describe the Labour Party as social democratic or the Third Way, rather than democratic socialist. Other commentators go further and argue that traditional social democratic parties across Europe, including the British Labour Party, have been so deeply transformed in recent years that it is no longer possible to describe them ideologically as "social democratic", and that this ideological shift has put new strains on the Labour Party's traditional relationship with the trade unions. Within the party, differentiation was made between the social democratic and the socialist wings of the party, the latter often subscribed to a radical socialist, even Marxist, ideology.
While affirming a commitment to democratic socialism, the new version of Clause IV no longer definitely commits the party to public ownership of industry and in its place advocates "the enterprise of the market and the rigour of competition" along with "high quality public services either owned by the public or accountable to them". MPs in the Socialist Campaign Group and the Labour Representation Committee see themselves as standard bearers for the radical socialist tradition in contrast to the democratic socialist tradition represented by organisations such as Compass and the magazine Tribune. The group Progress, founded in 1996, represents the centrist position in the party and was opposed to the Corbyn leadership. In 2015, Momentum was created by Jon Lansman as a grass-roots left-wing organisation following Jeremy Corbyn's election as party leader. Rather than organising among the PLP, Momentum is a rank-and-file grouping with an estimated 40,000 members. The party also has a Christian socialist faction, the Christians on the Left society.
Symbols
Labour has long been identified with red, a political colour traditionally affiliated with socialism and the labour movement. Prior to the red flag logo, the party had used a modified version of the classic 1924 shovel, torch, and quill emblem. In 1924, a brand-conscious Labour leadership had devised a competition, inviting supporters to design a logo to replace the 'polo mint' like motif that had previously appeared in party literature. The winning entry, emblazoned with the word "Liberty" over a design incorporating a torch, shovel, and quill symbol, was popularised through its sale, in badge form, for a shilling. The party conference in 1931 passed a motion "That this conference adopts Party Colours, which should be uniform throughout the country, colours to be red and gold". During the New Labour period, the colour purple was also used, and the party has employed other colours in certain areas according to local tradition.
Since the party's inception, the red flag has been Labour's official symbol; the flag has been associated with socialism and revolution ever since the 1789 French Revolution and the revolutions of 1848. The red rose, a symbol of socialism and social democracy, was adopted as the party symbol in 1986 as part of a rebranding exercise and is now incorporated into the party logo.
The red flag became an inspiration, which resulted in the composition of "The Red Flag", the official party anthem since its inception, being sung at the end of party conferences and on various occasions such as in Parliament in February 2006 to mark the centenary of the Labour Party's founding. It still remains in use, although attempts were made to play down the role of the song during New Labour. The song "Jerusalem", based on a William Blake poem, is also traditionally sung at the end of party conferences with The Red Flag.
Constitution and structure
Clause IV (1995)Party Constitution, Labour Party Rule BookThe Labour Party is a democratic socialist party. It believes that by the strength of our common endeavour we achieve more than we achieve alone, so as to create for each of us the means to realise our true potential and for all of us a community in which power, wealth and opportunity are in the hands of the many, not the few, where the rights we enjoy reflect the duties we owe, and where we live together, freely, in a spirit of solidarity, tolerance and respect.
The Labour Party is a membership organisation consisting of individual members and constituency Labour parties, affiliated trade unions, socialist societies and the Co-operative Party, with which it has an electoral agreement. Members who are elected to parliamentary positions take part in the Parliamentary Labour Party (PLP). Prior to Brexit in January 2020, members also took part in the European Parliamentary Labour Party (EPLP).
The party's decision-making bodies on a national level formally include the National Executive Committee (NEC), Labour Party Conference and National Policy Forum (NPF)—although in practice the Parliamentary leadership has the final say on policy. The 2008 Labour Party Conference was the first at which affiliated trade unions and Constituency Labour Parties did not have the right to submit motions on contemporary issues that would previously have been debated. Labour Party conferences now include more "keynote" addresses, guest speakers and question-and-answer sessions, while specific discussion of policy now takes place in the National Policy Forum.
The Labour Party is an unincorporated association without a separate legal personality, and the Labour Party Rule Book legally regulates the organisation and the relationship with members. The General Secretary represents the party on behalf of the other members of the Labour Party in any legal matters or actions.
Membership and registered supporters
As of 31 December 2010, under the new leader Ed Miliband, individual membership of the party was 193,261; a historical low for the Party since the 1930s. Membership remained relatively unchanged in the following years. In August 2015, prior to the 2015 leadership election, the Labour Party reported 292,505 full members, 147,134 affiliated supporters (mostly from affiliated trade unions and socialist societies) and 110,827 registered supporters; a total of about 550,000 members and supporters.
Following the election of Jeremy Corbyn as leader, individual membership almost doubled to 388,262 in December 2015; and rose significantly again the following year to 543,645 in December 2016. As of December 2017, the party had 564,443 full members, a peak since 1980 making it the largest political party in Western Europe. Consequently, membership fees became the largest component of the party's income, overtaking trade unions donations which were previously of most financial importance, making Labour the most financially well-off British political party in 2017. As of December 2019, the party had 532,046 full members.
In the 2020 leadership election, 490,731 people voted, of which 401,564 (81.8%) were members, 76,161 (15.5%) had affiliated membership and 13,006 (2.6%) were registered supporters. The registered supporter class was abolished in 2021. By December 2023, the party's membership had fallen to 370,450 members. In March 2024, it was revealed the party's membership had reduced further to 366,604 members.
Northern Ireland
For many years, Labour held to a policy of not allowing residents of Northern Ireland to apply for membership, instead supporting the Social Democratic and Labour Party (SDLP) which informally takes the Labour whip in the House of Commons. The 2003 Labour Party Conference accepted legal advice that the party could not continue to prohibit residents of the province joining, and whilst the National Executive has established a regional constituency party it has not yet agreed to contest elections there. In December 2015 a meeting of the members of the Labour Party in Northern Ireland decided unanimously to contest the elections for the Northern Ireland Assembly held in May 2016. The Labour Party in Northern Ireland moved a model motion, in July 2020, for Labour's NEC to allow them a "Right to Stand". The motion noted how the SDLP's alliance with Fianna Fáil, a member-party of the Liberal International in the Republic of Ireland, had meant that it was campaigning against the Irish Labour Party, which it saw as questioning "the legitimacy of Labour's sister party relationship".
Trade union link
See also: Trade unionism in the United KingdomThe Trade Union and Labour Party Liaison Organisation is the co-ordinating structure that supports the policy and campaign activities of affiliated union members within the Labour Party at the national, regional and local level.
As it was founded by the unions to represent the interests of working-class people, Labour's link with the unions has always been a defining characteristic of the party. In recent years this link has come under increasing strain, with the RMT being expelled from the party in 2004 for allowing its branches in Scotland to affiliate to the left-wing Scottish Socialist Party. Other unions have also faced calls from members to reduce financial support for the Party and seek more effective political representation for their views on privatisation, public spending cuts and the anti-trade union laws. Unison and GMB have both threatened to withdraw funding from constituency MPs and Dave Prentis of UNISON has warned that the union will write "no more blank cheques" and is dissatisfied with "feeding the hand that bites us". Union funding was redesigned in 2013 after the Falkirk candidate-selection controversy. The Fire Brigades Union, which "severed links" with Labour in 2004, re-joined the party under Corbyn's leadership in 2015.
European and international affiliation
The Labour Party was a founder member of the Party of European Socialists (PES). The European Parliamentary Labour Party's 10 MEPs were part of the Socialists and Democrats (S&D), the second largest group in the European Parliament. The Labour Party was represented by Emma Reynolds in the PES presidency.
The party was a member of the Labour and Socialist International between 1923 and 1940. Since 1951, the party has been a member of the Socialist International, which was founded thanks to the efforts of the Clement Attlee leadership. In February 2013, the Labour Party NEC decided to downgrade participation to observer membership status, "in view of ethical concerns, and to develop international co-operation through new networks". Labour was a founding member of the Progressive Alliance international founded in co-operation with the Social Democratic Party of Germany and other social-democratic parties on 22 May 2013.
Electoral performance
Main article: Electoral history of the Labour Party (UK)For all detailed election results involving the Labour Party including: general elections, devolved national elections, London Assembly, London Mayoral, combined authority and European Parliament elections see: Electoral history of the Labour Party (UK).
In all general elections since 1918, Labour has been either the governing party or the Official Opposition.
UK general election results
See also: Elections in the United Kingdom § General electionsFollowing the 1918 general election, Labour became the Official Opposition after the Conservatives went into coalition with the Liberal Party. Labour's first minority governments came following the 1923 and 1929 general elections, the latter being the first time Labour were the largest party in the country by seats won. They formed their first majority government following the 1945 general election. However, after winning the 1950 general election, Labour would lose the following election in 1951 to the Conservatives despite gaining the highest share of votes to date at 48.8%. During the 1983 election, Labour posted their worst vote share in the post-war period at 27.6%. In 1997, a party record of 418 Labour MPs were elected. At the 2024 general election, Labour won a landslide victory and returned to government with Keir Starmer as prime minister.
See also: Elections in the United Kingdom § General electionsElection | Leader | Votes | Seats | Position | Result | Ref | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No. | Share | No. | ± | Share | |||||
1900 | Keir Hardie | 62,698 | 1.8 | 2 / 670 | 2 | 0.3 | 4th | Conservative–Liberal Unionist | |
1906 | 321,663 | 5.7 | 29 / 670 | 27 | 4.3 | 4th | Liberal | ||
January 1910 | Arthur Henderson | 505,657 | 7.6 | 40 / 670 | 11 | 6.0 | 4th | Liberal minority | |
December 1910 | George Nicoll Barnes | 371,802 | 7.1 | 42 / 670 | 2 | 6.3 | 4th | Liberal minority | |
1918 | William Adamson | 2,245,777 | 20.8 | 57 / 707 | 15 | 8.1 | 4th | Coalition Liberal–Conservative | |
1922 | J. R. Clynes | 4,237,349 | 29.7 | 142 / 615 | 85 | 23.1 | 2nd | Conservative | |
1923 | Ramsay MacDonald | 4,439,780 | 30.7 | 191 / 615 | 49 | 30.1 | 2nd | Labour minority | |
1924 | 5,489,087 | 33.3 | 151 / 615 | 40 | 24.6 | 2nd | Conservative | ||
1929 | 8,370,417 | 37.1 | 287 / 615 | 136 | 47.0 | 1st | Labour minority | ||
1931 | Arthur Henderson | 6,649,630 | 30.9 | 52 / 615 | 235 | 8.5 | 2nd | Conservative–Liberal–National Labour | |
1935 | Clement Attlee | 8,325,491 | 38.0 | 154 / 615 | 102 | 25.0 | 2nd | Conservative–Liberal National–National Labour | |
1945 | 11,967,746 | 48.0 | 393 / 640 | 239 | 61.0 | 1st | Labour | ||
1950 | 13,266,176 | 46.1 | 315 / 625 | 78 | 50.4 | 1st | Labour | ||
1951 | 13,948,883 | 48.8 | 295 / 625 | 20 | 47.2 | 2nd | Conservative | ||
1955 | 12,405,254 | 46.4 | 277 / 630 | 18 | 44.0 | 2nd | Conservative | ||
1959 | Hugh Gaitskell | 12,216,172 | 43.8 | 258 / 630 | 19 | 40.1 | 2nd | Conservative | |
1964 | Harold Wilson | 12,205,808 | 44.1 | 317 / 630 | 59 | 50.3 | 1st | Labour | |
1966 | 13,096,629 | 48.0 | 364 / 630 | 47 | 57.8 | 1st | Labour | ||
1970 | 12,208,758 | 43.1 | 288 / 630 | 76 | 45.7 | 2nd | Conservative | ||
February 1974 | 11,645,616 | 37.2 | 301 / 635 | 13 | 47.4 | 1st | Labour minority | ||
October 1974 | 11,457,079 | 39.3 | 319 / 635 | 18 | 50.2 | 1st | Labour | ||
1979 | James Callaghan | 11,532,218 | 36.9 | 269 / 635 | 50 | 42.4 | 2nd | Conservative | |
1983 | Michael Foot | 8,456,934 | 27.6 | 209 / 650 | 60 | 32.2 | 2nd | Conservative | |
1987 | Neil Kinnock | 10,029,807 | 30.8 | 229 / 650 | 20 | 35.2 | 2nd | Conservative | |
1992 | 11,560,484 | 34.4 | 271 / 651 | 42 | 41.6 | 2nd | Conservative | ||
1997 | Tony Blair | 13,518,167 | 43.2 | 418 / 659 | 145 | 63.6 | 1st | Labour | |
2001 | 10,724,953 | 40.7 | 412 / 659 | 6 | 62.7 | 1st | Labour | ||
2005 | 9,552,436 | 35.2 | 355 / 646 | 47 | 55.0 | 1st | Labour | ||
2010 | Gordon Brown | 8,606,517 | 29.0 | 258 / 650 | 90 | 40.0 | 2nd | Conservative–Liberal Democrats | |
2015 | Ed Miliband | 9,347,324 | 30.4 | 232 / 650 | 26 | 35.7 | 2nd | Conservative | |
2017 | Jeremy Corbyn | 12,877,918 | 40.0 | 262 / 650 | 30 | 40.3 | 2nd | Conservative minority (with DUP confidence and supply) |
|
2019 | 10,269,051 | 32.1 | 202 / 650 | 60 | 31.1 | 2nd | Conservative | ||
2024 | Keir Starmer | 9,686,329 | 33.7 | 411 / 650 | 209 | 63.4 | 1st | Labour |
- Note
- The first election held under the Representation of the People Act 1918 in which all men over 21, and most women over the age of 30 could vote, and therefore a much larger electorate.
- First election held under the Representation of the People (Equal Franchise) Act 1928 which gave all women aged over 21 the vote.
- Franchise extended to all 18 to 20-year-olds under the Representation of the People Act 1969.
Leadership
Leaders of the Labour Party since 1906
Main article: Leader of the Labour Party (UK)Source:
- Keir Hardie (1906–1908)
- Arthur Henderson (1908–1910)
- George Barnes (1910–1911)
- Ramsay MacDonald (1911–1914)
- Arthur Henderson (1914–1917)
- William Adamson (1917–1921)
- J. R. Clynes (1921–1922)
- Ramsay MacDonald (1922–1931)
- Arthur Henderson (1931–1932)
- George Lansbury (1932–1935)
- Clement Attlee (1935–1955)
- Hugh Gaitskell (1955–1963)
- George Brown (1963; acting)
- Harold Wilson (1963–1976)
- James Callaghan (1976–1980)
- Michael Foot (1980–1983)
- Neil Kinnock (1983–1992)
- John Smith (1992–1994)
- Margaret Beckett (1994; acting)
- Tony Blair (1994–2007)
- Gordon Brown (2007–2010)
- Harriet Harman (2010; acting)
- Ed Miliband (2010–2015)
- Harriet Harman (2015; acting)
- Jeremy Corbyn (2015–2020)
- Keir Starmer (2020–present)
Deputy Leaders of the Labour Party since 1922
Main article: Deputy Leader of the Labour Party (UK)- J. R. Clynes (1922–1932)
- William Graham (1931–1932)
- Clement Attlee (1932–1935)
- Arthur Greenwood (1935–1945)
- Herbert Morrison (1945–1956)
- Jim Griffiths (1956–1959)
- Aneurin Bevan (1959–1960)
- George Brown (1960–1970)
- Roy Jenkins (1970–1972)
- Edward Short (1972–1976)
- Michael Foot (1976–1980)
- Denis Healey (1980–1983)
- Roy Hattersley (1983–1992)
- Margaret Beckett (1992–1994)
- John Prescott (1994–2007)
- Harriet Harman (2007–2015)
- Tom Watson (2015–2019)
- Angela Rayner (2020–present)
Leaders in the House of Lords since 1924
- Richard Haldane, 1st Viscount Haldane (1924–1928)
- Charles Cripps, 1st Baron Parmoor (1928–1931)
- Arthur Ponsonby, 1st Baron Ponsonby of Shulbrede (1931–1935)
- Harry Snell, 1st Baron Snell (1935–1940)
- Christopher Addison, 1st Viscount Addison (1940–1952)
- William Jowitt, 1st Earl Jowitt (1952–1955)
- Albert Victor Alexander, 1st Earl Alexander of Hillsborough (1955–1964)
- Frank Pakenham, 7th Earl of Longford (1964–1968)
- Edward Shackleton, Baron Shackleton (1968–1974)
- Malcolm Shepherd, 2nd Baron Shepherd (1974–1976)
- Fred Peart, Baron Peart (1976–1982)
- Cledwyn Hughes, Baron Cledwyn of Penrhos (1982–1992)
- Ivor Richard, Baron Richard (1992–1998)
- Margaret Jay, Baroness Jay of Paddington (1998–2001)
- Gareth Williams, Baron Williams of Mostyn (2001–2003)
- Valerie Amos, Baroness Amos (2003–2007)
- Catherine Ashton, Baroness Ashton of Upholland (2007–2008)
- Janet Royall, Baroness Royall of Blaisdon (2008–2015)
- Angela Smith, Baroness Smith of Basildon (2015–present)
Labour prime ministers
Name | Portrait | Country of birth | Periods in office |
---|---|---|---|
Ramsay MacDonald | Scotland | 1924; 1929–1931 (first and second MacDonald ministries) | |
Clement Attlee | England | 1945–1950; 1950–1951 (Attlee ministry) | |
Harold Wilson | England | 1964–1966; 1966–1970; 1974; 1974–1976 (first, second, third and fourth Wilson ministries) | |
James Callaghan | England | 1976–1979 (Callaghan ministry) | |
Tony Blair | Scotland | 1997–2001; 2001–2005; 2005–2007 (first, second and third Blair ministries) | |
Gordon Brown | Scotland | 2007–2010 (Brown ministry) | |
Keir Starmer | England | 2024–present (Starmer ministry) |
See also
- Labour Representation Committee election results
- List of Labour Party (UK) MPs
- List of organisations associated with the Labour Party (UK)
- List of Labour Party (UK) general election manifestos
- English Labour Network
- Politics of the United Kingdom
- Post-war consensus
- Socialist Labour Party (UK)
- Socialist Party (England and Wales)
References
- Brivati & Heffernan 2000: "On 27 February 1900, the Labour Representation Committee was formed to campaign for the election of working class representatives to parliament."
- Thorpe 2008, p. 8.
- "Labour". The Labour Party. Retrieved 7 December 2024.
- "Contact". Labour Party. Archived from the original on 24 September 2020. Retrieved 14 September 2020.
- ^ Helm, Toby (30 March 2024). "Labour membership falls by 23,000 over Gaza and green policies". The Guardian. Retrieved 30 March 2024.
- ^ McGee, Luke (5 July 2024). "As Europe turns right, why has a center-left party won by a landslide in the UK?". CNN. Archived from the original on 5 July 2024. Retrieved 8 July 2024.
- ^ "Europe's Center-Left Can Learn a Lot From Scholz, Sanchez and Starmer". World Politics Review. 20 September 2023. Archived from the original on 8 July 2024. Retrieved 8 July 2024.
- ^ Dahlgreen, Will (23 July 2014). "Britain's changing political spectrum". YouGov. Archived from the original on 26 May 2015. Retrieved 26 May 2015.
- ^ Peacock, Mike (8 May 2015). "The European centre-left's quandary". Reuters. Archived from the original on 26 May 2015. Retrieved 26 May 2015.
A crushing election defeat for Britain's Labour party has laid bare the dilemma facing Europe's centre-left.
- ^ Budge 2008, pp. 26–27.
- The Telegraph. "'Change begins now', says Sir Keir Starmer in first speech after winning general election". The Telegraph. Retrieved 18 October 2024.
- Sparrow, Andrew (17 September 2024). "Labour unveils 'Change Begins' as conference slogan". The Guardian. Retrieved 18 October 2024.
- "Open Council Data UK – compositions councillors parties wards elections". opencouncildata.co.uk. Archived from the original on 30 April 2021. Retrieved 19 December 2022.
- Abou-Chadi, Tarik; Gingrich, Jane (9 May 2021). "It's not just in Britain – across Europe, social democracy is losing its way". The Observer. ISSN 0029-7712. Archived from the original on 13 September 2024. Retrieved 17 July 2024.
- "Britain's Labour Party embraces supply-side social democracy". The Economist. 11 October 2023. ISSN 0013-0613. Archived from the original on 18 July 2024. Retrieved 17 July 2024.
- Clarkson, Alexander (20 September 2023). "Europe's Center-Left Can Learn a Lot From Scholz, Sanchez and Starmer". World Politics Review. Archived from the original on 8 July 2024. Retrieved 17 July 2024.
- Matthew Worley (2009). The Foundations of the British Labour Party: Identities, Cultures and Perspectives, 1900–39. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. pp. 1–2. ISBN 978-0-7546-6731-5.
- Martin Pugh, Speak for Britain!: a new history of the Labour Party (1910), pp. 14–50. online
- Frank Bealey, "The Electoral Arrangement between the Labour Representation Committee and the Liberal Party," Journal of Modern History 28#4 (1956), pp. 353–373 in JSTOR Archived 1 July 2024 at the Wayback Machine
- Pugh, Speak for Britain!, pp. 52–68.
- Taylor, Robert (2000). "Out of the bowels of the Movement: The Trade Unions and the Origins of the Labour Party 1900–18". The Labour Party. pp. 8–49. doi:10.1057/9780230595583_2. ISBN 978-0-333-74650-9. Archived from the original on 13 September 2024. Retrieved 2 July 2024.
- Stanley Shapiro, "The Passage of Power: Labor and the New Social Order." Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 120.6 (1976): 464–474. online
- Keith Laybourn, "The rise of Labour and the decline of Liberalism: the state of the debate." History 80.259 (1995): 207–226. online
- David Marquand, Ramsay Macdonald(1977), pp. 297–328.
- Marquand, Ramsay Macdonald(1977), pp. 329–356.
- Paul W. Doerr, British Foreign Policy, 1919-1939 (1998), pp. 78–83.
- Marquand, Ramsay Macdonald (1977), pp. 422–440, 483–488.
- Paul W. Doerr, British Foreign Policy, 1919–1939 (1998) pp.106–107, 119–120.
- Hugh Dalton, Principles of public finance (1954) p. 213–220 online.
- Pelling, A Short History of the Labour Party, pp.63–79.
- R. Bassett, Nineteen thirty-one political crisis (1958) pp. 127–182. online
- Andrew Thorpe, Britain in the 1930s (1992) pp. 41–49.
- Pelling, A Short History of the Labour Party, pp.79–87.
- L. C. B. Seaman, Post-Victorian Britain: 1902-1951 (1966) pp. 205–246.
- Kenneth Harris, Attlee (1982) pp.161–162.
- John Bew, Clement Attlee (2017) pp.245–336.
- Steven Fielding, "What did 'the people' want?: the meaning of the 1945 general election". Historical Journal 35#3 (1992): 623–639 online Archived 2 March 2017 at the Wayback Machine.
- William Harrington, and Peter Young. The 1945 revolution (1978) pp. 186-206 online
- John Bew, Clement Attlee: The Man Who Made Modern Britain(Oxford UP, 2017) pp. 397–409. online
- John Singleton, "Labour, the Conservatives and nationalisation." in The political economy of nationalisation in Britain, 1920–1950 (1995): 13-33.
- David Kynaston, Austerity Britain, 1945–1951 (2008)
- Derek H. Aldcroft, The British Economy: Volume 1 The Years of Turmoil, 1920-1951 (1986) pp.206, 209. online.
- Michael J. Hogan, The Marshall Plan: America, Britain and the Reconstruction of Western Europe, 1947-1952 (Cambridge Up, 1987), pp. 29, 31, 48, 82–84.
- Kenneth O. Morgan, Labour in Power, 1945-1951 (1984) pp.270–272, 366.
- Norman Moss, Picking up the Reins: America, Britain and the Postwar World(Duckworth, 2008) pp.131–151.
- Bew, Clement Attlee (2017) pp. 426–443.
- John Darwin. "The Crisis of Empire, 1945–48." in Britain and Decolonisation: The retreat from empire in the post-war world (1988): 69-125.
- Robert Frazier, "Did Britain Start the Cold War? Bevin and the Truman Doctrine" The Historical Journal (1984) 27#3:715-727. doi:10.1017/S0018246X00018045
- Richard Gott, “The Evolution of the Independent British Deterrent.” International Affairs 39#2 (1963), pp. 238–52. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2611300.
- Brian Harrison, “The Rise, Fall and Rise of Political Consensus in Britain since 1940.” History 84#274 (1999), pp. 301–24. online
- Jeremy Black, A history of Britain: 1945 to Brexit ( Indiana University Press, 2017) p. 130.
- Peter Hennessy, Having it so good: Britain in the fifties (Penguin UK, 2007).
- Alastair J. Reid and Henry Pelling, A Short History of the Labour Party (12th ed. 2005) pp.94–103 online.
- Ben Pimlott, Harold Wilson (HarperCollins, 1992) pp.282–309, 395–404. online
- David E. Butler, and Anthony King, The British General Election of 1966 (1966) pp.1-22 online.
- Peter Dorey, "Social and Sexual Liberalisation," in Andrew S. Crines and Kevin Hickson, eds., Harold Wilson: The Unprincipled Prime Minister?: A Reappraisal of Harold Wilson (Biteback Publishing, 2016) pp.165–203.
- Jane Martin, "Education Policy," in Crines and Hickson, eds., Harold Wilson (2016) pp.131–148.
- Philip Ziegler, Harold Wilson: The Authorized Biography Life of Lord Wilson of Rievaulx (Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1993) PP.346–354 online.
- David Butler, The British general election of February 1974 (1974) pp.10–26, 270–273. online
- Ziegler, Harold Wilson pp Death.400–421 online.
- Ziegler, Wilson (1995) pp. 400–491.
- Kenneth O. Morgan, Britain Since 1945: The People's Peace (Oxford UP, 2001). p. 437.
- Kenneth O. Morgan, The People's Peace (2001) pp 456–478, 490–491, 500–501.online
- The 1983 manifesto entitled "The New Hope for Britain" is online here Archived 24 September 2015 at the Wayback Machine
- Peter Jenkins, Mrs. Thatcher's Revolution: The Ending of the Socialist Era (1988) pp. 102-128. online
- Brian Brivati and Richard Heffernan, eds. The Labour Party: A Centenary History (2000) pp. 112-142, 376-377.
- Kenneth Morgan, Britain since 1945: The People's Peace (2001) p.510.
- Dennis Kavanaugh, "Opposition" in Dennis Kavanaugh and Anthony Selden, eds The Major Effect (1994) pp. 145-153.
- David Butler, and Dennis Kavanagh, eds The British General Election of 1992 (1992) pp.247–275. online
- David Butler and Dennis Kavanagh, eds., The British general election of 1997 (1997), pp 46–67.
- Rentoul 2001, pp. 206–218.
- Rentoul 2001, pp. 249–266.
- "new Labour because Britain deserves better". Labour Party. Archived from the original on 31 July 2008.
- "Nigel has written a key list" (PDF). Paultruswell.org.uk. Archived from the original (PDF) on 23 October 2006. Retrieved 23 July 2015.
- "Reforms – ISSA". Issa.int. 7 January 2004. Archived from the original on 23 January 2016. Retrieved 31 May 2013.
- "Making a difference: Tackling poverty – a progress report" (PDF). Department for Work and Pensions. Archived from the original (PDF) on 8 August 2011. Retrieved 29 August 2011.
- "UK: numbers in low income". The Poverty Site. Archived from the original on 13 July 2010. Retrieved 31 May 2013.
- "Work, Family, Health, and Well-Being: What We Know and Don't Know about Outcomes for Children" (PDF). OECD. Archived (PDF) from the original on 21 July 2015. Retrieved 26 September 2013.
- Mitchinson, John; Pollard, Justin; Oldfield, Molly; Murray, Andy (26 December 2009). "QI: Our Quite Interesting Quiz of the Decade, compiled by the elves from the TV show". The Daily Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on 24 May 2010. Retrieved 14 May 2010.
- "European Opposition To Iraq War Grows | Current Affairs". Deutsche Welle. 13 January 2003. Archived from the original on 23 January 2012. Retrieved 13 April 2010.
- Tucker, Spencer C. (14 December 2015). U.S. Conflicts in the 21st Century: Afghanistan War, Iraq War, and the War on Terror [3 volumes]: Afghanistan War, Iraq War, and the War on Terror. ABC-CLIO. p. 83. ISBN 978-1-4408-3879-8. Archived from the original on 15 December 2016. Retrieved 7 June 2016 – via Google Books.
- McClintock 2010, p. 150.
- Bennhold, Katrin (28 August 2004). "Unlikely alliance built on opposition to Iraq war now raises questions". International Herald Tribune. Archived from the original on 7 December 2008. Retrieved 13 April 2010.
- Fishwick, Carmen (8 July 2016). "'We were ignored': anti-war protesters remember the Iraq war marches". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 11 October 2017. Retrieved 10 October 2017.
- "Chilcot report: key points from the Iraq inquiry". The Guardian. 6 July 2016. Archived from the original on 11 October 2017. Retrieved 10 October 2017.
- "I will quit within a year – Blair". BBC News. 7 September 2007. Archived from the original on 17 November 2006.
- Patrick Wintour (4 May 2007). "SNP wins historic victory". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 23 March 2017. Retrieved 16 June 2023.
- "Blair resigns as prime minister". BBC News. 27 June 2007. Archived from the original on 13 September 2017. Retrieved 16 June 2023.
- "Gordon Brown admits 'big mistake' over banking crisis". BBC News. 11 April 2011. Archived from the original on 16 June 2023. Retrieved 16 June 2023.
- Kirkup, James; Prince, Rosa (30 July 2008). "Labour Party membership falls to lowest level since it was founded in 1900". The Daily Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on 17 April 2018. Retrieved 2 April 2018.
- "John Marshall: Membership of UK political parties; House of Commons, SN/SG/5125; 2009, page 9" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 January 2013.
- "Election 2010 results". BBC News. Archived from the original on 14 April 2010. Retrieved 16 June 2023.
- "UK election results: data for every candidate in every seat". The Guardian. London. 7 May 2010. Archived from the original on 28 March 2017.
- Wintour, Patrick (7 May 2010). "General election 2010: Can Gordon Brown put together a rainbow coalition?". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on 28 March 2017. Retrieved 15 December 2016.
- Mason, Trevor; Smith, Jon (10 May 2010). "Gordon Brown to resign as Labour leader". The Independent. London. Archived from the original on 13 May 2010. Retrieved 2 September 2017.
- "Harman made acting Labour leader". BBC News. 11 May 2010. Archived from the original on 2 September 2017. Retrieved 11 May 2010.
- Miliband, Ed (25 May 2012). "Building a responsible capitalism". Juncture (IPPR). Archived from the original on 26 May 2012. Retrieved 5 June 2012.
- "Ed Miliband's Banking Reform Speech: The Full Details". New Statesman. Archived from the original on 21 July 2015. Retrieved 5 October 2014.
- "Ed Miliband: Surcharge culture is fleecing customers". BBC News. 19 January 2012. Archived from the original on 22 January 2012. Retrieved 5 June 2012.
- "Ed Miliband speech on Social Mobility to the Sutton Trust". The Labour Party. 21 May 2012. Archived from the original on 24 May 2012. Retrieved 5 June 2012.
- Neild, Barry (6 July 2011). "Labour MPs vote to abolish shadow cabinet elections". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 3 October 2015. Retrieved 26 July 2011.
- "John Prescott calls for Labour shadow cabinet reshuffle". BBC News. 26 September 2011. Archived from the original on 6 September 2017. Retrieved 31 October 2016.
- Andrew Grice (28 February 2014). "Tony Blair backs Ed Miliband's internal Labour reforms". The Independent. London. Archived from the original on 22 August 2015. Retrieved 26 July 2015.
- Andrew Sparrow (1 March 2014). "Miliband wins vote on Labour party reforms with overwhelming majority". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 23 September 2015. Retrieved 24 August 2015.
- "Is Osborne right that a smaller state means a richer UK?". BBC News. Archived from the original on 2 October 2014. Retrieved 5 October 2014.
- "How many seats did Labour win?". The Independent. London. 8 May 2015. Archived from the original on 10 May 2015. Retrieved 8 May 2015.
- "Scotland election 2015 results: SNP landslide amid almost total Labour wipeout – as it happened". The Daily Telegraph. London. 8 May 2015. Archived from the original on 8 May 2015. Retrieved 8 May 2015.
- "Labour election results: Ed Miliband resigns as leader". BBC News. 8 May 2015. Archived from the original on 8 May 2015. Retrieved 8 May 2015.
- Mason, Rowena (12 September 2015). "Labour leadership: Jeremy Corbyn elected with huge mandate". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on 17 September 2015. Retrieved 12 September 2015.
- Eaton, George (12 September 2015). "The epic challenges facing Jeremy Corbyn as Labour leader". New Statesman. Archived from the original on 23 September 2015. Retrieved 20 September 2015.
- "Labour leadership: Huge increase in party's electorate". BBC News. 12 August 2015. Archived from the original on 29 September 2015. Retrieved 15 September 2015.
- "Jeremy Corbyn: Membership of Labour party has doubled since 2015 general election". International Business Times. 8 October 2015. Archived from the original on 5 December 2016. Retrieved 11 October 2016.
- "Jeremy Corbyn Is Re-elected as Leader of Britain's Labour Party". The New York Times. 24 September 2016. Archived from the original on 4 September 2017. Retrieved 11 October 2016.
- Syal, Rajeev; Perraudin, Frances; Slawson, Nicola (27 June 2016). "Shadow cabinet resignations: who has gone and who is staying". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 22 July 2016. Retrieved 8 July 2016.
- Asthana, Anushka; Syal, Rajeev; Elgot, Jessica (28 June 2016). "Labour MPs prepare for leadership contest after Corbyn loses confidence vote". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on 28 June 2016. Retrieved 28 July 2023.
- McTague, Tom (25 June 2016). "How David Cameron blew it". Politico. Archived from the original on 19 November 2020. Retrieved 28 July 2023.
- Elgot, Jessica (27 June 2016). "Labour crisis: the most powerful lines from shadow cabinet resignations". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 28 July 2023.
- Asthana, Anushka; Elgot, Jessica; Syal, Rajeev (28 June 2016). "Jeremy Corbyn suffers heavy loss in Labour MPs confidence vote". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 28 June 2016. Retrieved 28 June 2016.
- "Labour leadership: Jeremy Corbyn defeats Owen Smith". BBC News. 24 September 2016. Archived from the original on 24 September 2016. Retrieved 24 September 2016.
- "Theresa May seeks general election". BBC News. 18 April 2017. Archived from the original on 15 August 2017. Retrieved 18 April 2017.
- Castle, Stephen (23 September 2018). "Jeremy Corbyn, at Labour Party Conference, Faces Pressure on New Brexit Vote". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 6 December 2019.
- Griffin, Andrew (9 June 2017). "Corbyn gives Labour biggest vote share increase since 1945". The London Economic. Archived from the original on 11 June 2017. Retrieved 10 June 2017.
- Travis, Alan (11 June 2017). "Labour can win majority if it pushes for new general election within two years". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 24 July 2017. Retrieved 24 July 2017.
- Blitz, James (26 June 2017). "The UK Conservative party's deal with DUP is the easy part". Financial Times. Archived from the original on 21 June 2024. Retrieved 21 June 2024.
- "Jeremy Corbyn regrets comments about 'anti-Semitic' mural". BBC News. 23 March 2018. Archived from the original on 13 December 2019.
- Coulter, Martin (25 August 2019). "Jeremy Corbyn defends 'Zionists and English irony' comments". PoliticsHome. Archived from the original on 22 June 2019.
- Stewart, Heather; Marsh, Sarah (1 May 2019). "Jewish leaders demand explanation over Corbyn book foreword". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2019.
- "Jeremy Corbyn apologises over 2010 Holocaust event". BBC News. 1 August 2018. Archived from the original on 19 December 2019.
- "Chakrabarti inquiry: Labour not overrun by anti-Semitism". BBC News. 30 June 2016. Archived from the original on 30 June 2016. Retrieved 14 January 2024.
- Crerar, Pippa (21 May 2018). "Ken Livingstone quits Labour after antisemitism claims". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on 30 July 2023. Retrieved 29 July 2023.
- "Peter Willsman: Labour suspends NEC member over anti-Semitism remarks". BBC News. 31 May 2019. Retrieved 23 September 2024.
- Speare-Cole, Rebecca (7 November 2019). "Chris Williamson to stand as independent MP after Labour ban". Evening Standard. Archived from the original on 29 July 2023. Retrieved 29 July 2023.
- "Labour party must listen to the Jewish community on defining antisemitism". The Guardian. 16 July 2018. Archived from the original on 17 October 2019.
- "Luciana Berger quits the Labour party over 'institutional anti-semitism'". ITV. 18 February 2019. Archived from the original on 3 December 2019.
- Mirvis, Ephraim (25 November 2019). "What will become of Jews in Britain if Labour forms the next government?". The Times. Archived from the original on 28 November 2019.
- Mason, Paul (15 August 2016). "The parallels between Jeremy Corbyn and Michael Foot are almost all false". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on 3 April 2019. Retrieved 20 December 2019.
- Collier, Ian (14 December 2019). "General election: Jeremy Corbyn to quit as Labour leader after disastrous night". Sky News. Archived from the original on 6 January 2021. Retrieved 19 December 2020.
- "Jeremy Corbyn: 'I will not lead Labour at next election'". BBC News. 13 December 2019. Archived from the original on 14 December 2019. Retrieved 17 September 2023.
- "What does the Labour anti-Semitism report say?". BBC News. 29 October 2020. Archived from the original on 20 November 2020. Retrieved 7 December 2020.
- "Jeremy Corbyn rejects overall findings of EHRC report on antisemitism in Labour | Labour | The Guardian". amp.theguardian.com. Retrieved 7 December 2024.
- "Anti-Semitism used as factional weapon within Labour, says report". BBC News. 19 July 2022. Retrieved 7 December 2024.
- Stewart, Heather; Elgot, Jessica (19 July 2022). "Key takeaways from the Forde report on Labour factionalism". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 7 December 2024.
- Forde, Martin. "The Forde Report" (PDF). The Forde Report.
- "Keir Starmer elected as new Labour leader". 4 April 2020. Archived from the original on 25 April 2020. Retrieved 4 April 2020.
- Mason, Chris; Whannel, Kate (23 February 2023). "Keir Starmer unveils Labour's five missions for the country". BBC News. Archived from the original on 7 July 2024. Retrieved 5 July 2024.
- "Labour manifesto 2024: Find out how Labour will get Britain's future back". The Labour Party. 23 May 2024. Archived from the original on 13 June 2024. Retrieved 12 June 2024.
- "Labour Party Manifesto 2024" (PDF). Labour Party Manifesto 2024. Archived (PDF) from the original on 14 June 2024. Retrieved 13 June 2024.
- Reid, Jenni (13 June 2024). "Britain's Labour Party pledges 'wealth creation' as it targets landslide election victory". CNBC. Archived from the original on 13 June 2024. Retrieved 13 June 2024.
- "Starmer launches Labour's pro-business, pro-worker manifesto with £7.35bn of new taxes". Yahoo News. 13 June 2024. Archived from the original on 13 June 2024. Retrieved 13 June 2024.
- Mason, Rowena (13 June 2024). "Change and growth: five key takeaways from the Labour manifesto launch". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 13 June 2024.
- Gibbons, Amy; Sigsworth, Tim (16 May 2024). "Labour Party manifesto 2024: Keir Starmer's election promises". The Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Archived from the original on 6 July 2024. Retrieved 13 June 2024.
- "General election 2024 in maps and charts". BBC News. 6 July 2024. Archived from the original on 8 July 2024. Retrieved 8 July 2024.
- "General election 2024 in maps and charts". BBC News. 6 July 2024. Archived from the original on 8 July 2024. Retrieved 8 July 2024.
- ^ Brown, Faye (5 July 2024). "'Change begins now', Starmer says - as Labour win historic landslide". Sky News. Archived from the original on 5 July 2024. Retrieved 5 July 2024.
- Mason, Rowena (5 July 2024). "Keir Starmer promises 'stability and moderation' in first speech as PM". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on 7 July 2024. Retrieved 5 July 2024.
- "Rachel Reeves Goes for Growth as UK's First Female Chancellor". Bloomberg.com. 5 July 2024. Retrieved 5 July 2024.
- "Rachel Reeves: First female chancellor a 'game-changer' says MP". BBC News. 8 July 2024. Archived from the original on 9 July 2024. Retrieved 9 July 2024.
- "Starmer pledges growth with building and rail reforms". BBC News. BBC. 17 July 2024. Archived from the original on 31 August 2024. Retrieved 17 July 2024.
- "Key points in King's Speech at a glance". BBC News. 15 July 2024. Archived from the original on 29 August 2024. Retrieved 25 July 2024.
- Martin Daunton "The Labour Party and Clause Four 1918–1995" Archived 21 July 2015 at the Wayback Machine, History Review 1995 (History Today website)
- Philip Gould The Unfinished Revolution: How New Labour Changed British Politics Forever, London: Hachette digital edition, 2011, p.30 (originally published by Little, Brown, 1998)
- John Rentoul "'Defining moment' as Blair wins backing for Clause IV" Archived 8 September 2017 at the Wayback Machine, The Independent, 14 March 1995.
- Lund 2006, p. 111.
- Mulholland, Helene (7 April 2011). "Labour will continue to be pro-business, says Ed Miliband". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on 28 March 2017. Retrieved 15 December 2016.
- Hay 2002, pp. 114–115; Hopkin & Wincott 2006; Jessop 2004; McAnulla 2006, pp. 118, 127, 133, 141; Merkel et al. 2008, pp. 4, 25–26, 40, 66.
- Lavelle, Ashley (2008). The Death of Social Democracy, Political Consequences for the 21st Century. Ashgate Publishing.
- Daniels & McIlroy 2009; McIlroy 2011; Smith 2009; Smith & Morton 2006.
- Crines 2011, p. 161.
- "What's left of the Labour left?". Total Politics. Archived from the original on 21 August 2015. Retrieved 6 May 2015.
- ^ "Labour Party Rule Book" (PDF). Labour Party. 2023. Archived (PDF) from the original on 5 July 2024. Retrieved 4 January 2023.
- "How we work – How the party works". Labour Party. Archived from the original on 6 June 2013. Retrieved 31 May 2013.
- Akehurst, Luke (14 March 2011). "Compass and Progress: A tale of two groupings". LabourList. Archived from the original on 6 July 2015. Retrieved 6 May 2015.
- Angell, Richard (2 March 2017). "The problem is politics, not PR". Progress Online. Archived from the original on 17 September 2017. Retrieved 26 July 2017.
few come more 'militant anti-Corbyn' than I
- "What would Jeremy do?". Progress Online. 20 July 2017. Archived from the original on 8 August 2017. Retrieved 24 July 2017.
- Cowburn, Ashley (4 April 2018). "Momentum: Corbyn-backing organisation now has 40,000 paying members, overtaking Green Party". The Independent. Archived from the original on 5 April 2018. Retrieved 11 April 2018.
- "Christian Socialist Movement: Labour party affiliation". 3 May 2009. Archived from the original on 3 May 2009. Retrieved 8 January 2022.
- Kurian, Thomas, ed. (2011). The Encyclopedia of Political Science. Washington D.C.: CQ Press. p. 1555.
- Routledge, Paul (22 May 1994). "Labour revives faith in Christian Socialism". The Independent on Sunday.
- "Labour Party Annual Conference Report", 1931, p. 233.
- "The seats where Tories weren't blue and Labour wasn't red". BBC News. 3 May 2015. Archived from the original on 2 July 2023. Retrieved 2 July 2023.
- Abrams, Fran (20 April 1997). "Election '97: Labour go from red to purple". The Independent. Archived from the original on 2 July 2023. Retrieved 2 July 2023.
- "The long and the short about Labour's red rose". The Daily Telegraph. London. 26 June 2001. Archived from the original on 3 September 2014. Retrieved 31 August 2014.
- Grady, Helen (21 March 2011). "Blue Labour: Party's radical answer to the Big Society?". BBC News. Archived from the original on 15 September 2018. Retrieved 20 June 2018.
- Hoggart, Simon (28 September 2007). "Red Flag rises above a dodgy future". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on 2 October 2013. Retrieved 21 December 2011.
- "Video: Ed Miliband sings The Red Flag and Jerusalem at the Labour Party Conference". The Daily Telegraph. London. 29 September 2011. Archived from the original on 9 September 2018. Retrieved 2 April 2018.
- "Labour conference: National Anthem to open event". BBC News. 19 September 2022. Archived from the original on 2 July 2023. Retrieved 2 July 2023.
- "Anger over 'union debate limit'". BBC News. 19 September 2007. Archived from the original on 8 September 2017. Retrieved 13 April 2009.
- Aamodt, Athelstane (17 September 2015). "Unincorporated associations and elections". Local Government Lawyer. Archived from the original on 10 January 2016. Retrieved 21 September 2015.
- "Watt (formerly Carter) (sued on his own on behalf of the other members of the Labour Party) (Respondent) v. Ahsan (Appellant)". The Lords of Appeal. House of Lords. 18 July 2007. UKHL 51. Archived from the original on 17 May 2015. Retrieved 2 October 2013.
- ^ "Financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2011". search.electoralcommission.org.uk.
- "Financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2013". search.electoralcommission.org.uk.
- ^ "Financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2015". search.electoralcommission.org.uk. Archived from the original on 1 July 2023. Retrieved 26 July 2023.
- Oliver Wright (10 September 2015). "Labour leadership contest: After 88 days of campaigning, how did Labour's candidates do?". The Independent. Archived from the original on 14 September 2015. Retrieved 11 September 2015.
the electorate is divided into three groups: 292,000 members, 148,000 union "affiliates" and 112,000 registered supporters who each paid £3 to take part
- Bloom, Dan (25 August 2015). "All four Labour leadership candidates rule out legal fight – despite voter count plummeting by 60,000". Daily Mirror. Archived from the original on 8 September 2015. Retrieved 11 September 2015.
total of those who can vote now stands at 550,816 ... The total still eligible to vote are now 292,505 full paid-up members, 147,134 supporters affiliated through the unions and 110,827 who've paid a £3 fee.
- "The Labour Party – Financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2017" Archived 20 September 2023 at the Wayback Machine Labour Party. July 2018. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
- "The Labour Party – Financial statements for the year ending 31 December 2017". Labour Party. July 2018. Archived from the original on 20 January 2022. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
- Waugh, Paul (13 June 2017). "Labour Party Membership Soars By 35,000 In Just Four Days – After 'Corbyn Surge' In 2017 General Election". Huffington Post. Archived from the original on 30 June 2017. Retrieved 30 June 2017.
- Audickas, Lukas (3 September 2018). "UK political party membership figures: August 2018". House of Commons library. Archived from the original on 3 September 2018. Retrieved 4 September 2018.
- Sabbagh, Dan (22 August 2018). "Labour is Britain's richest party – and it's not down to the unions". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 22 August 2018. Retrieved 23 August 2018.
- "The Labour Party – Financial statements for the year ending 31 December 2019". The Electoral Commission. July 2020. Archived from the original on 20 January 2022. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
- Burton, Matthew; Tunnicliffe, Richard (30 August 2022). "Membership of political parties in Great Britain" (PDF). House of Commons Library. UK Parliament. Archived (PDF) from the original on 25 March 2023. Retrieved 25 March 2023.
- Morton, Becky (22 August 2024). "Party memberships fell in 2023 despite looming election". BBC News. Archived from the original on 22 August 2024. Retrieved 23 August 2024.
- Labour Party membership form at the Wayback Machine (archive index), ca. 1999. Retrieved 31 March 2007. "Residents of Northern Ireland are not eligible for membership."
- Understanding Ulster Archived 6 August 2011 at the Wayback Machine by Antony Alcock, Ulster Society Publications, 1997. Chapter II: The Unloved, Unwanted Garrison. Via Conflict Archive on the Internet. Retrieved 31 October 2008.
- "Labour NI ban overturned". BBC News. 1 October 2003. Archived from the original on 7 March 2013. Retrieved 31 May 2013.
- "LPNI prepare to fight elections". Labour Party in Northern Ireland. Archived from the original on 14 January 2016.
- ^ "Labour Party Northern Ireland model statement on Right to Stand". Labour Party in Northern Ireland. 4 July 2020. Retrieved 23 January 2022.
- "Trade Union and Labour Party Liaison Organisation (TULO)". Archived from the original on 22 January 2014. Retrieved 10 February 2014.
- "RMT 'breached' Labour party rules". BBC News. 27 January 2004. Archived from the original on 8 September 2017.
- "Labour's link to unions in danger". BBC News. 16 June 2004. Archived from the original on 8 September 2017.
- "CWU resolution to TUC Congress 2009". TUC Congress Voices. Archived from the original on 21 June 2010. Retrieved 13 April 2010.
- Dunton, Jim (17 June 2009). "Unison: "no more blank cheques' for Labour". Local Government Chronicle. Archived from the original on 21 July 2015. Retrieved 13 April 2010.
- "Miliband urges 'historic' changes to Labour's union links". BBC News. 9 July 2013. Archived from the original on 28 October 2018. Retrieved 20 June 2018.
- Features (24 December 2015). "Corbyn has brought back Labour, so the FBU brought back the firefighters". Morning Star. Archived from the original on 18 January 2017. Retrieved 16 January 2017.
- "Party of European Socialists". Archived from the original on 8 December 2013. Retrieved 10 February 2014.
- Kowalski, Werner (1985). Geschichte der sozialistischen arbeiter-internationale: 1923–1940 [History of the Socialist Workers' International: 1923–1940] (in German). Berlin: Dt. Verl. d. Wissenschaften. Archived from the original on 2 December 2016 – via Google Books.
- Black, Ann (6 February 2013). "Report from Labour's January executive". Leftfutures.org. Archived from the original on 17 June 2015. Retrieved 31 May 2013.
- "Progressive Alliance: Sozialdemokraten gründen weltweites Netzwerk" [Progressive Alliance: Social Democrats establish global network]. Der Spiegel (in German). Spiegel.de. 22 May 2013. Archived from the original on 21 July 2015. Retrieved 31 May 2013.
- "Vorwurf: SPD "spaltet die Linken"" [Accusation: SPD "splits the left"] (in German). Kurier.At. 22 May 2013. Archived from the original on 10 August 2015. Retrieved 31 May 2013.
- "Vorwärts in eine ungewisse Zukunft – 150 Jahre SPD" [Forward to an uncertain future – 150 years of the SPD] (in German). Morgenweb.de. 22 May 2013. Archived from the original on 21 July 2015. Retrieved 31 May 2013.
- "Sozialdemokratische Parteien gründen neues Bündnis" [Social democratic parties found new alliance]. Deutsche Welle (in German). Archived from the original on 26 April 2015. Retrieved 26 December 2019.
- ^ Cracknell, Richard; Uberoi, Elise; Burton, Matthew (9 August 2023). "UK Election Statistics: 1918–2023, A Long Century of Elections" (PDF). House of Commons Library. p. 8. Archived (PDF) from the original on 26 September 2021. Retrieved 27 September 2023.
- Reid, Alastair J.; Pelling, Henry (2005). A Short History of the Labour Party (12th ed.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. p. 210. ISBN 1-4039-9313-0.
- "A quick guide to Labour's leaders". BBC News. 23 September 2016. Archived from the original on 25 September 2023. Retrieved 27 September 2023.
- Craig, F. W. S. (1975). British General Election Manifestos, 1900–1974. London: Macmillan. p. 1. ISBN 0-333-17154-3.
- Craig, F. W. S. (1975). British General Election Manifestos, 1900–1974. London: Macmillan. p. 7. ISBN 0-333-17154-3.
- Craig, F. W. S. (1975). British General Election Manifestos, 1900–1974. London: Macmillan. p. 14. ISBN 0-333-17154-3.
- Craig, F. W. S. (1975). British General Election Manifestos, 1900–1974. London: Macmillan. p. 23. ISBN 0-333-17154-3.
- "Representation of the People Act 1918". UK Parliament. Archived from the original on 10 November 2023. Retrieved 6 October 2023.
- ^ Cracknell, Richard; Uberoi, Elise; Burton, Matthew (9 August 2023). "UK Election Statistics: 1918–2023, A Long Century of Elections" (PDF). House of Commons Library. pp. 16–17. Archived (PDF) from the original on 26 September 2021. Retrieved 28 September 2023.
- Craig, F. W. S. (1975). British General Election Manifestos, 1900–1974. London: Macmillan. p. 27. ISBN 0-333-17154-3.
- Craig, F. W. S. (1975). British General Election Manifestos, 1900–1974. London: Macmillan. p. 35. ISBN 0-333-17154-3.
- Craig, F. W. S. (1975). British General Election Manifestos, 1900–1974. London: Macmillan. p. 44. ISBN 0-333-17154-3.
- Craig, F. W. S. (1975). British General Election Manifestos, 1900–1974. London: Macmillan. p. 54. ISBN 0-333-17154-3.
- "On this day in May 1929 women vote in general election on same terms as men". UK Parliament. 30 May 2018. Archived from the original on 10 November 2023. Retrieved 6 October 2023.
- Craig, F. W. S. (1975). British General Election Manifestos, 1900–1974. London: Macmillan. p. 69. ISBN 0-333-17154-3.
- Craig, F. W. S. (1975). British General Election Manifestos, 1900–1974. London: Macmillan. p. 89. ISBN 0-333-17154-3.
- Craig, F. W. S. (1975). British General Election Manifestos, 1900–1974. London: Macmillan. p. 101. ISBN 0-333-17154-3.
- "1969 Representation of the People Act". UK Parliament House of Commons Library. Archived from the original on 1 January 2024. Retrieved 6 October 2023.
- "General Election Results, 9 June 1983" (PDF). House of Commons Public Information Office. Archived (PDF) from the original on 26 November 2020. Retrieved 27 September 2023.
- "General Election Results, 1987" (PDF). House of Commons Public Information Office. Archived (PDF) from the original on 23 October 2020. Retrieved 27 September 2023.
- "General Election Results" (PDF). House of Commons Public Information Office. Archived (PDF) from the original on 14 November 2020. Retrieved 27 September 2023.
- "General Election results, 1 May 1997" (PDF). House of Commons Library. 29 March 2001. Archived (PDF) from the original on 26 September 2023. Retrieved 26 September 2023.
- "General Election results, 7 June 2001" (PDF). House of Commons Library. 18 June 2001. Archived (PDF) from the original on 27 November 2023. Retrieved 26 September 2023.
- "General Election 2005" (PDF). House of Commons Library. pp. 32, 92. Archived (PDF) from the original on 11 August 2022. Retrieved 21 July 2023.
- "Election 2010 Timeline: How coalition was agreed". BBC News. 13 May 2010. Archived from the original on 6 September 2017. Retrieved 26 September 2023.
- "General Election 2010" (PDF). House of Commons Library. 2 February 2011. pp. 30, 86. Archived (PDF) from the original on 8 October 2023. Retrieved 2 October 2023.
- "UK 2015 general election results in full". The Guardian. 7 May 2015. Archived from the original on 13 September 2019. Retrieved 26 September 2023.
- "General Election 2015" (PDF). House of Commons Library. 28 July 2015. Archived (PDF) from the original on 6 October 2023. Retrieved 2 October 2023.
- Hunt, Alex (26 June 2017). "Theresa May and the DUP deal: What you need to know". BBC News. Archived from the original on 23 November 2018. Retrieved 26 September 2023.
- "General Election 2017: results and analysis" (PDF). House of Commons Library. 29 January 2019. pp. 8–12. Archived (PDF) from the original on 12 November 2019. Retrieved 2 October 2023.
- "General Election 2019: results and analysis" (PDF). House of Commons Library. 28 January 2020. pp. 8–12. Archived (PDF) from the original on 18 November 2021. Retrieved 2 October 2023.
- "Live results: The winners in every seat". Financial Times. Archived from the original on 8 July 2024. Retrieved 8 July 2024.
- "A quick guide to Labour's leaders". BBC News. 23 September 2016. Archived from the original on 25 September 2023. Retrieved 25 September 2023.
- ^ "Labour Party Rule Book 2014" (PDF). House of Commons Library. Archived (PDF) from the original on 25 October 2016. Retrieved 26 October 2016.
When the party is in opposition and the party leader, for whatever reason, becomes permanently unavailable, the deputy leader shall automatically become party leader on a pro-tem basis.
Bibliography
- Barlow, Keith (2008). The Labour Movement in Britain from Thatcher to Blair. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. ISBN 978-3-631-55137-0.
- "Scottish election 2021: The numbers behind the result". BBC News. Archived from the original on 10 May 2021. Retrieved 7 July 2024.
- Beech, Matt (2006). The Political Philosophy of New Labour. International Library of Political Studies. Vol. 6. London: Tauris Academic Studies. ISBN 978-1-84511-041-3.
- Bell, Geoffrey (1982). Troublesome Business: Labour Party and the Irish Question. Pluto Press. ISBN 978-0-86104-373-6.
- Brivati, Brian; Heffernan, Richard (2000). The Labour Party: A Centenary History. Basingstoke: Macmillan. ISBN 978-0-312-23458-4.
- Budge, Ian (2008). "Great Britain and Ireland: Variations in Party Government". In Colomer, Josep M. (ed.). Comparative European Politics (3rd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-134-07354-2.
- Clark, Alistair (2012). Political Parties in the UK. Contemporary Political Studies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-0-230-36868-2.
- Crines, Andrew Scott (2011). Michael Foot and the Labour leadership. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars. ISBN 978-1-4438-3239-7.
- Daniels, Gary; McIlroy, John, eds. (2009). Trade Unions in a Neoliberal World: British Trade Unions under New Labour. Routledge Research in Employment Relations. Vol. 20. London: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-42663-3.
- Garnett, Mark, Gavin Hyman, and Richard Johnson. Keeping the Red Flag Flying: The Labour Party in Opposition Since 1922 (John Wiley & Sons, 2024).
- Hay, Colin (2002). British Politics Today. Cambridge: Polity Press. ISBN 978-0-7456-2319-1.
- Heath, Anthony F.; Jowell, Roger M.; Curtice, John K. (2001). The Rise of New Labour: Party Policies and Voter Choices: Party Policies and Voter Choices. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-152964-1.
- Heppell, Timothy (2012). "Hugh Gaitskell, 1955–1963". In Heppell, Timothy (ed.). Leaders of the Opposition: From Churchill to Cameron. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-0-230-29647-3.
- Hopkin, Jonathan; Wincott, Daniel (2006). "New Labour, Economic Reform and the European Social Model". British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 8 (1): 50–68. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.554.5779. doi:10.1111/j.1467-856X.2006.00227.x. ISSN 1467-856X. S2CID 32060486.
- Jessop, Bob (2004) . "From Thatcherism to New Labour: Neo-liberalism, Workfarism and Labour-market Regulation". In Overbeek, Henk (ed.). The Political Economy of European Employment: European Integration and the Transnationalization of the (Un)employment Question. RIPE Series in Global Political Economy. London: Routledge. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.460.4922. ISBN 978-0-203-01064-8.
- Jones, Tudor (1996). Remaking the Labour Party: From Gaitskell to Blair. London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-134-80132-9.
- Kelliher, Diarmaid (2014). "Solidarity and Sexuality: Lesbians and Gays Support the Miners 1984–1985" (PDF). History Workshop Journal. 77 (1): 240–262. doi:10.1093/hwj/dbt012. ISSN 1477-4569. S2CID 41955541. Archived (PDF) from the original on 22 July 2018. Retrieved 14 July 2019.
- Kenny, Michael; Smith, Martin J. (2013) . "Discourses of Modernization: Gaitskell, Blair and Reform of Clause IV". In Denver, David; Fisher, Justin; Ludlam, Steve; Pattie, Charles (eds.). British Elections and Parties Review. Vol. 7. London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-135-25578-7.
- Leach, Robert (2015). Political Ideology in Britain (3rd ed.). London: Palgrave. ISBN 978-1-137-33255-4.
- Lund, Brian (2006). "Distributive Justice and Social Policy". In Lavalette, Michael; Pratt, Alan (eds.). Social Policy: Theories, Concepts and Issues (3rd ed.). London: SAGE Publications. pp. 107–123. ISBN 978-1-4129-0170-3.
- McAnulla, Stuart (2006). British Politics: A Critical Introduction. London: Continuum International Publishing Group. ISBN 978-0-8264-6156-8.
- McClintock, John (2010). The Uniting of Nations: An Essay on Global Governance (3rd ed.). Brussels: Peter Lang. ISBN 978-90-5201-588-0.
- McIlroy, John (2011). "Britain: How Neo-Liberalism Cut Unions Down to Size". In Gall, Gregor; Wilkinson, Adrian; Hurd, Richard (eds.). The International Handbook of Labour Unions: Responses to Neo-Liberalism. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. pp. 82–104. ISBN 978-1-84844-862-9.
- Merkel, Wolfgang; Petring, Alexander; Henkes, Christian; Egle, Christoph (2008). Social Democracy in Power: The Capacity to Reform. London: Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-0-415-43820-9.
- Pugh, Martin (2011) . Speak for Britain! A New History of the Labour Party. London: Vintage Books. ISBN 978-0-09-952078-8.
- Rentoul, John (2001). Tony Blair: Prime Minister. London: Little, Brown and Company. ISBN 978-0-316-85496-2.
- Riddell, Neil (1997). "The Catholic Church and the Labour Party, 1918–1931". Twentieth Century British History. 8 (2): 165–193. doi:10.1093/tcbh/8.2.165. ISSN 1477-4674.
- Shaw, Eric (1988). Discipline and Discord in the Labour Party: The Politics of Managerial Control in the Labour Party, 1951–1987. Manchester University Press. ISBN 978-0-7190-2483-2.
- Smith, Paul (2009). "New Labour and the Commonsense of Neoliberalism: Trade Unionism, Collective Bargaining and Workers' Rights". Industrial Relations Journal. 40 (4): 337–355. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2338.2009.00531.x. ISSN 1472-9296. S2CID 154993304.
- Smith, Paul; Morton, Gary (2006). "Nine Years of New Labour: Neoliberalism and Workers' Rights" (PDF). British Journal of Industrial Relations. 44 (3): 401–420. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8543.2006.00506.x. ISSN 1467-8543. S2CID 155056617. Archived from the original (PDF) on 26 July 2016. Retrieved 26 July 2016.
- Taylor, A. J. P. (1965). English History: 1914–1945. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Thorpe, Andrew (1996). "The Industrial Meaning of 'Gradualism': The Labour Party and Industry, 1918–1931". Journal of British Studies. 35 (1): 84–113. doi:10.1086/386097. hdl:10036/19512. ISSN 1545-6986. JSTOR 175746. S2CID 155016569.
- ——— (2001). A History of the British Labour Party (2nd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave. ISBN 978-0-333-92908-7.
- ——— (2008). A History of the British Labour Party (3rd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-1-137-11485-3.
- Wright, Tony; Carter, Matt (1997). The People's Party: The History of the Labour Party. London: Thames & Hudson. ISBN 978-0-500-27956-4.
Further reading
- Bassett, Lewis. "Corbynism: Social democracy in a new left garb." Political Quarterly 90.4 (2019): 777–784 online Archived 5 February 2023 at the Wayback Machine
- Brivati, Brian, and Richard Heffernan, eds. The Labour Party: A Centenary History (2000) online Archived 23 November 2022 at the Wayback Machine, 27 chapters by experts
- Davies, A. J. To Build a New Jerusalem: Labour Movement from the 1890s to the 1990s (1996).
- Driver, Stephen; and Luke Martell. New Labour: Politics after Thatcherism (Polity Press, wnd ed. 2006).
- Foote, Geoffrey. The Labour Party's Political Thought: A History (Macmillan, 1997).
- Harris, Kenneth. Attlee (1982) online
- Kavanagh, Dennis. The Politics of the Labour Party (Routledge, 2013).
- Morgan, Kenneth O. Labour People: Leaders and Lieutenants, Hardie to Kinnock (Oxford UP, 1992), scholarly biographies of 30 key leaders.
- Morgan, Kenneth O. "United Kingdom: A Comparative Case Study of Labour Prime Ministers Attlee, Wilson, Callaghan and Blair" The Journal of Legislative Studies 10.2-3 (2004): 38–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/135723304200032220
- Pelling, Henry; and Alastair J. Reid. A Short History of the Labour Party (12th ed. 2005) online
- Pimlott, Ben, and Chris Cook, eds. Trade unions in British politics: the first 250 years (2nd ed. Longman, 1991)
- Plant, Raymond, Matt Beech and Kevin Hickson, eds. The Struggle for Labour's Soul: understanding Labour's political thought since 1945 (2004)
- Rogers, Chris. "'Hang on a Minute, I've Got a Great Idea': From the Third Way to Mutual Advantage in the Political Economy of the British Labour Party." British Journal of Politics and International Relations 15#1 (2013): 53–69.
- Rosen, Greg, ed. Dictionary of Labour Biography. (Politicos Publishing, 2001), 665pp; 300 short biographies by experts. online
- Rosen, Greg. Old Labour to New, Politicos Publishing, 2005.
- Seaman, L. C. B. Post-Victorian Britain: 1902-1951 (1966) online
- Shaw, Eric. The Labour Party since 1979: Crisis and Transformation (Routledge, 1994). online
- Shaw, Eric. "Understanding Labour Party Management under Tony Blair." Political Studies Review 14.2 (2016): 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929915623296
- Taylor, Robert. The Parliamentary Labour Party: A History 1906–2006 (2007).
- Timmins, Nicholas. The five giants: a biography of the welfare state (2nd ed. 2001) online
External links
- Official website
- Labour History Group website
- Labour History Archive and Study Centre holds archives of the National Labour Party
- Catalogue of the Labour Party East Midlands Region archives—held at the Modern Records Centre, University of Warwick
Political parties in the United Kingdom | |
---|---|
Legislatures of the United Kingdom (and their current compositions) | |
House of Commons (650) |
|
House of Lords (801) |
|
Scottish Parliament (129) |
|
Senedd (60) |
|
Northern Ireland Assembly (90) |
|
London Assembly (25) |
|
Other parties | |
*Co-operative Party candidates stand jointly with the Labour Party. 5 independent MPs work together in the Independent Alliance technical group. Sinn Féin have elected members and offices at Westminster, but as abstentionists do not take their seats. | |
Party of European Socialists | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
European Parliament group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats | |||||||||||||
Parties |
| ||||||||||||
Presidents | |||||||||||||
Leaders in the European Parliament |
| ||||||||||||
European Commissioners (2024–2029) |
| ||||||||||||
Heads of government |
| ||||||||||||
Heads of state |
|