Talk:Efforts to impeach George W. Bush: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 03:25, 29 September 2019 editJohn Broughton (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers35,683 edits →top: reassessing as "C" class← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 14:21, 10 November 2024 edit undoTom.Reding (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Template editors3,807,897 editsm blpo=yes + blp=no/null → blp=other; cleanupTag: AWB
(21 intermediate revisions by 18 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Talk header}}		{{Talk header}}
	{{BLP others}}
	{{Calm}}		{{Calm}}
	{{WikiProject United States\|class=C\|importance=low\|USGov=yes\|USGov-importance=low\|USPresidents=yes\|USPresidents-importance=low}}
	{{User:MiszaBot/config
	\|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}}
	\|maxarchivesize = 45K
	\|counter = 14
	\|minthreadsleft = 7
	\|algo = old(45d)
	\|archive = Talk:Movement to impeach George W. Bush/Archive %(counter)d
	}}
	{{Old XfD multi		{{Old XfD multi
	\| date = 31 July 2005		\| date = 31 July 2005
Line 28:		Line 18:

	}}		}}
			{{WikiProject banner shell\|blp=other\|class=C\|1=
	{{Archive box\|auto=yes}}
			{{WikiProject United States\|importance=Low\|USGov=yes\|USGov-importance=Low\|USPresidents=yes\|USPresidents-importance=Low\|DC=yes\|DC-importance=\|TX=yes\|TX-importance=low}}

			{{WikiProject Military history\|class=C\|b1=no\|b2=yes\|b3=yes\|b4=yes\|b5=yes\|Aviation=yes\|US=yes}}
	==AFD merge==
			{{WikiProject Bush family \|importance=Low}}

			{{WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography\|importance=Low\|terrorism=yes\|terrorism-imp=Low}}
	==Trump on Impeachment==
			{{WikiProject Connecticut\|importance=Low}}
			{{WikiProject Conservatism\|importance=Low}}
			{{WikiProject Politics\|importance=Low\|American=yes\|American-importance=Top}}
			}}
			{{User:MiszaBot/config
			\|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}}
			\|maxarchivesize = 45K
			\|counter = 15
			\|minthreadsleft = 7
			\|algo = old(45d)
			\|archive = Talk:Efforts to impeach George W. Bush/Archive %(counter)d
			}}
			{{Archives\|auto=yes}}

			== Trump on Impeachment ==
	"Property mogul and diehard Republican Donald Trump told CNN on Wednesday that President George W. Bush misled the US into the Iraq War and should have been impeached when the Democrats took control of Congress in 2006." {{cite news \| url=http://web.archive.org/web/20081019225344/http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5jEwnQC3h5l3nVJ7w4uNs7V3YBDoQ \| title=Bush should have been impeached: Donald Trump \| date=Oct 15, 2008 \| publisher=]}} {{cite news \| url=http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/10/15/trump-i-wanted-bush-impeached/ \| title=Trump: I wanted Bush impeached \| date=October 15, 2008 \| publisher=]}} <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </small>		"Property mogul and diehard Republican Donald Trump told CNN on Wednesday that President George W. Bush misled the US into the Iraq War and should have been impeached when the Democrats took control of Congress in 2006." {{cite news \| url=http://web.archive.org/web/20081019225344/http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5jEwnQC3h5l3nVJ7w4uNs7V3YBDoQ \| title=Bush should have been impeached: Donald Trump \| date=Oct 15, 2008 \| publisher=]}} {{cite news \| url=http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/10/15/trump-i-wanted-bush-impeached/ \| title=Trump: I wanted Bush impeached \| date=October 15, 2008 \| publisher=]}} <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </small>

	==~~References~~==		== Obama ==
			This article doesn't mention ] once. That's kind of a problem. I know WP:DOITYOURSELF or whatever, but I just don't have the time. ] (]) 01:18, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

	{{Reflist}}

	==Obama==

	This article doesn't mention ] once. That's kind of a problem. I know WP:DOITYOURSELF or whatever, but I just don't have the time. ] (]) 01:18, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
	:Why in the world would it mention Obama? ] (]) 01:19, 31 March 2009 (UTC)		:Why in the world would it mention Obama? ] (]) 01:19, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
	:: Indeed, Obama never called for the impeachment of Bush, nor even hinted at it or responded favorably to any suggestion of it, that I can find. No connection, no place in the article. ] ] 02:15, 31 March 2009 (UTC)		:: Indeed, Obama never called for the impeachment of Bush, nor even hinted at it or responded favorably to any suggestion of it, that I can find. No connection, no place in the article. ] ] 02:15, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
Line 50:		Line 49:
	:This is because Obama opposed the WAR IN IRAQ, so thusly he would've opposed Bush. The obama point looks ], though.--] (]) 22:23, 3 October 2010 (UTC)		:This is because Obama opposed the WAR IN IRAQ, so thusly he would've opposed Bush. The obama point looks ], though.--] (]) 22:23, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

	==~~Movement~~ ~~to==~~OR==		== OR ==

	I feel that this article, by its very nature is ]. Without a ] that describes this supposed 'Movement to impeach George W. Bush' as a movement (like you might find for the '60s anti-war movement, for example) we are left to cobble together any and all calls for impeachment, which is exactly what this article does. This is clearly OR, the description of a previously undocumented 'movement'.		I feel that this article, by its very nature is ]. Without a ] that describes this supposed 'Movement to impeach George W. Bush' as a movement (like you might find for the '60s anti-war movement, for example) we are left to cobble together any and all calls for impeachment, which is exactly what this article does. This is clearly OR, the description of a previously undocumented 'movement'.

Line 57:		Line 55:

	Agreed. ] (]) 02:23, 14 September 2009 (UTC)		Agreed. ] (]) 02:23, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
	: Bush has been out of office for nearly eight months now, and yet over the weekend I saw four cars with "Impeach Bush" bumper stickers. I have no objection to renaming the article ], but impeachment is a political process driven at least in part by the sentiments of citizens, which relates the collective expression such sentiments by citizens to whatever official action follows. ] ] 02:56, 14 September 2009 (UTC)		:Bush has been out of office for nearly eight months now, and yet over the weekend I saw four cars with "Impeach Bush" bumper stickers. I have no objection to renaming the article ], but impeachment is a political process driven at least in part by the sentiments of citizens, which relates the collective expression such sentiments by citizens to whatever official action follows. ] ] 02:56, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

	::Sure, I cant argue with the fact that impeachment is a political process, but that is ok, because we can easily document politics. Collective sentiment, on the other hand, is not so easy to document without performing OR. ] (]) 13:30, 14 September 2009 (UTC)		::Sure, I cant argue with the fact that impeachment is a political process, but that is ok, because we can easily document politics. Collective sentiment, on the other hand, is not so easy to document without performing OR. ] (]) 13:30, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Line 70:		Line 68:

	This article was edited and fought over by thousands of people while Bush was in office, it would routinely see dozens of edits per day for years on end. Now two or three editors have basically gutted it of all its former content without much discussion because no one cares anymore that Bush is no longer President. Anyway, the material is all there in the edit history for anyone who wishes to go back and look at what this article used to be like. ] (]) 22:30, 1 September 2010 (UTC)		This article was edited and fought over by thousands of people while Bush was in office, it would routinely see dozens of edits per day for years on end. Now two or three editors have basically gutted it of all its former content without much discussion because no one cares anymore that Bush is no longer President. Anyway, the material is all there in the edit history for anyone who wishes to go back and look at what this article used to be like. ] (]) 22:30, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
	:: What is a good date to read for a complete version? ] (]) 07:37, 11 February 2015 (UTC)		::What is a good date to read for a complete version? ] (]) 07:37, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
	:: includes more extensive coverage of local community efforts and public opinion polls. ] ] 17:38, 11 February 2015 (UTC)		:: includes more extensive coverage of local community efforts and public opinion polls. ] ] 17:38, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
	:Is there no ] on impeachment? Like, ''being in office''? (For the record, I think W. belongs in Gitmo, but honestly...) ] ]~~</font>~~ 08:10, 2 January 2011 (UTC)		:Is there no ] on impeachment? Like, ''being in office''? (For the record, I think W. belongs in Gitmo, but honestly...) ] ] 08:10, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

	==Requested move==
	<div class="boilerplate" style="background-color: #efe; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px dotted #aaa;"><!-- Template:RM top -->
	:''The following discussion is an archived discussion of a ]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. ''

	The result of the move request was '''page moved'''. <font face="New York"><span style="background-color:black; color:gray;">], ]</span></font> 10:18, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

	----

	] → ] — Current title requires ] ties together disparate impeachment efforts into previously undocumented 'movement'. — ] (]) 13:47, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

	===Survey===
	:''Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with'' <code><nowiki>'''Support'''</nowiki></code> ''or'' <code><nowiki>'''Oppose'''</nowiki></code>'', then sign your comment with'' <code><nowiki>~~~~</nowiki></code>''. Since ], please explain your reasons, taking into account ].''

	*

	===Discussion===
	:''Any additional comments:''
	*Note: Reformatted request for the WP:RM page. ] (]) 17:46, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
	:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a ]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div><!-- Template:RM bottom -->

	==Related discussion - ]==

	I have nominated ] for deletion. Since that organization is related to the subject matter of this page, editors here may wish to opine at ]. ] ] 15:37, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

	Here's another relevant AfD - ]. Cheers! ] ] 16:27, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

	==saved references ==

	The following section will be used to save refs that might be needed later, but dont quite fit in at the moment.

	originally Web-posted by ] member ] (D-Calif.)

	UN Committee against Torture report
	* BBC, May 19, 2006
	* CBS News, May 19, 2006

	] (]) 17:51, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

	==First pass==

	Ive made a first pass at cleaning up this article, including removing the most obvious ] and detailing the Kucinich/Wexler Impeachment resolution. Obviously, at this point, more needs to be done to detail the a fore mentioned resolution, better organize the information and expand on the claims. ] (]) 19:46, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

	:Yes, congrats for removing from Misplaced Pages any mention that private citizens of the United States were interested in seeing Bush impeached. In an attempt to remove bias you've actually created a very biased history article. ] (]) 22:34, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

	==Tags removed, radical refactoring==

	Seeing as this article has undergone a dramatic re-editing, I have removed the POV and citations tags. My feeling is that those tags reasonably applied to the previous versions of this article, but not really to this new incarnation. If anyone disagrees, feel free to re-add any tags necessary and discuss here. ] (]) 18:38, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

	:If it was me, I would restore a large part of the article as it was previously, at least as it was around Nov 2008. It was really pretty good, the POV tags were mostly unwarranted. The article as it is now is incomplete and biased by way of excluding important elements. ] (]) 22:37, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
	::I disagree, what is there reflects the actual charges against George W. Bush and represents the major gripes against him as president. Other charges and events, while interesting, weren't really substantative and, in most cases, nothing more than examples of citizens expressing their disatisfaction w/President Bush. ] (]) 13:48, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

	==Tree ornament ==

	I have removed the following <small>Every year, the ] is decorated by ] from all ] throughout the United States. To assist in this task, each member of ] solicits a contribution from local artists in their district. In 2008, Representative ] selected an artist from his district, Deborah Lawrence, to submit an ornament for the tree. Lawrence wrote in ] "Impeach Bush" on her ornament. Initially, Lawrence's ornament was selected to be hung on the National Christmas Tree,<ref>{{cite news\|url=http://voices.washingtonpost.com/reliable-source/2008/12/rs-ornament2.html\|title=Christmas Colors for the White House: Red, White and Impeach\|date=], 2008\|publisher=]\|first1=Roxanne\|last1=Roberts\|first2=Amy\|last2=Argetsinger\|authorlink1=Roxanne Roberts\|authorlink2=Amy Argetsinger}}</ref> but following publication of the fine print on the ornament, the ornament was removed from the tree.<ref>{{cite news\|url=http://voices.washingtonpost.com/reliable-source/2008/12/ornament_update.html\|title=White House Won't Hang Christmas Impeachment Ornament\|date=], 2008\|publisher=]\|first1=Roxanne\|last1=Roberts\|first2=Amy\|last2=Argetsinger\|authorlink1=Roxanne Roberts\|authorlink2=Amy Argetsinger}}</ref></small> because it no longer fits in to the subject of this article. Efforts to impeach GWB are just that, actual attempts to impeach, as opposed to minor acts of defiance and protest. This tree ornament is just that, a minor protest that happened to get some press. Read the rest of the article, you will notice it consists entirely of actual legislative and political moves, making this ornament thing out of place. ] (]) 13:24, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
	: I agree. This is an advocation, not an "effort". While public opinion polling is relevant as an indicator of political impetus, this lone act is neither a barometer of public opinion, nor an action with any legal significance as a move towards an actual impeachment. ] ] 14:59, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
	::The arguments presented here are very reasonable, and I agree with this consensus.
	::My apologies for . I did not see this discussion at the time I made that edit.
	::] (]) 17:54, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

	{{Reflist-talk}}

	==Link 1 404==		==Link 1 404==

Latest revision as of 14:21, 10 November 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Efforts to impeach George W. Bush article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15Auto-archiving period: 45 days

Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

Keep, 20 January 2009, see discussion.
Keep, 19 October 2006, see discussion.
Keep, 7 May 2006, see discussion.
Keep, 31 July 2005, see discussion.

While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.

This article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States: District of Columbia / Presidents / Texas / Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Washington, D.C. portal This article is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia.
	This article is supported by WikiProject United States Presidents (assessed as Low-importance).
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

Military history: Aviation / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Bush family (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bush family, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Bush familyWikipedia:WikiProject Bush familyTemplate:WikiProject Bush familyBush family

Crime and Criminal Biography: Terrorism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Terrorism task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Connecticut Low‑importance

	Connecticut portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: American Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Top-importance).

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15

This page has archives. Sections older than 45 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 7 sections are present.

Trump on Impeachment

"Property mogul and diehard Republican Donald Trump told CNN on Wednesday that President George W. Bush misled the US into the Iraq War and should have been impeached when the Democrats took control of Congress in 2006." "Bush should have been impeached: Donald Trump". AFP. Oct 15, 2008. "Trump: I wanted Bush impeached". CNN. October 15, 2008. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Terjen (talk • contribs)

Obama

This article doesn't mention Barack Obama once. That's kind of a problem. I know WP:DOITYOURSELF or whatever, but I just don't have the time. Bsimmons666 (talk) 01:18, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Why in the world would it mention Obama? Soxwon (talk) 01:19, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Indeed, Obama never called for the impeachment of Bush, nor even hinted at it or responded favorably to any suggestion of it, that I can find. No connection, no place in the article. bd2412 T 02:15, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

HUH???!!!! What does Obama have to do with any of this? And why would his not being mentioned be "kind of a problem"??!!!! This person makes no sense at all! (Yakofujimato (talk) 22:49, 10 October 2009 (UTC))

This is because Obama opposed the WAR IN IRAQ, so thusly he would've opposed Bush. The obama point looks better in his biography, though.--Cymbelmineer (talk) 22:23, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

OR

I feel that this article, by its very nature is OR. Without a reliable source that describes this supposed 'Movement to impeach George W. Bush' as a movement (like you might find for the '60s anti-war movement, for example) we are left to cobble together any and all calls for impeachment, which is exactly what this article does. This is clearly OR, the description of a previously undocumented 'movement'.

I think the best solution is to rename this article Efforts to impeach George W. Bush or something like that and remove anything that is not an impeachment resolution or related to an official action. Bonewah (talk) 14:19, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Agreed. ] (talk) 02:23, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Bush has been out of office for nearly eight months now, and yet over the weekend I saw four cars with "Impeach Bush" bumper stickers. I have no objection to renaming the article Efforts to impeach George W. Bush, but impeachment is a political process driven at least in part by the sentiments of citizens, which relates the collective expression such sentiments by citizens to whatever official action follows. bd2412 T 02:56, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Sure, I cant argue with the fact that impeachment is a political process, but that is ok, because we can easily document politics. Collective sentiment, on the other hand, is not so easy to document without performing OR. Bonewah (talk) 13:30, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

That is simply inaccurate. The article never intended to prove there was a collective movement, the word movement was never being used in a collective sense, the lead section explained very clearly what the article covered. Article titles on Misplaced Pages are place holders and not meant to be taken literal. They nuance of an article title is explained in the lead section. Also, the article documented very well popular sentiment towards impeachment, this is an important part of American history that has been entirely wiped off of Misplaced Pages. Congrats. Green Cardamom (talk) 22:30, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

This whole thing falls seriously short of meeting the reasonable definition of a movement. It seems as if only fringe far left political figures like Wexler, Conyers and Kuchinich were pushing this. This effort never gathered the support of mainstream liberals or Democrats, and never had a realistic chance of success. To call this ill fated distraction a "movement" is a bit much. Nobody seriously thought that this would work, nor did anyone believe that this had much support, even with skewed, questionable Canadian polls to the contrary. I've seen polls that birthers (similar crackpots to the impeachers) have commissioned that state 55% of Americans believe Obama was born in Kenya. Should we give them a 'Movement to Impeach Obama' page??? This was a bunch of far left nonsense, and was never a widespread "movement".(Yakofujimato (talk) 23:03, 10 October 2009 (UTC))

Ok I am going to request a page move (this might be controversial, so ill avoid just doing it) on or about October 16 unless anyone objects here. My proposal is to move this page to Efforts to impeach George W. Bush and narrow it's scope to only concrete impeachment actions, like Wexler, Conyers and Kuchinich's impeachment attempts. After this move I intend to remove at least the Treatment of detainees, NSA warrantless surveillance controversy, U.N. Charter and any other section not covered in the afore mentioned impeachment attempts. After that, I propose we expand the description of what was included in the impeachment attempts and describe them in more detail. Bonewah (talk) 13:35, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Check that, I will add the template today as there is a backlog of at least a few days. Bonewah (talk) 13:47, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

This article was edited and fought over by thousands of people while Bush was in office, it would routinely see dozens of edits per day for years on end. Now two or three editors have basically gutted it of all its former content without much discussion because no one cares anymore that Bush is no longer President. Anyway, the material is all there in the edit history for anyone who wishes to go back and look at what this article used to be like. Green Cardamom (talk) 22:30, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

What is a good date to read for a complete version? GangofOne (talk) 07:37, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

This version includes more extensive coverage of local community efforts and public opinion polls. bd2412 T 17:38, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Is there no statute of limitations on impeachment? Like, being in office? (For the record, I think W. belongs in Gitmo, but honestly...) TREKphiler 08:10, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Link 1 404

Link 1 is no longer working. I will see if there is an alternate, or if not I will have to re-write most of the article.--Cymbelmineer (talk) 22:25, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Bonewah (talk) 23:22, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Efforts to impeach George W. Bush. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070214092150/http://www.startribune.com:80/587/story/960880.html to http://www.startribune.com/587/story/960880.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:46, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Seems like this article should be renamed

This article is exclusively about one attempt to impeach GWB. The title implies there were multiple attempts. Perhaps the name should be changed?

The 'Political views and actions' section covers some other (admittedly minor) attempts at impeachment. Still, what would you propose as a name change? Bonewah (talk) 13:44, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

It is honestly sad that there is even a page like this, or one for Obama, or one for Trump, or any political figure where a vote never even took place, much less an impeachment itself. Creating a record of something that a few people attempted to do but were unable to achieve, with its own specific page, is an odd course of action and undeniably a by-product of the left-leaning viewpoints of Misplaced Pages that seriously tilted that way during the presidency of George W. Bush.

One could substantiate a case for a single page titled "Efforts to impeach U.S. Presidents" with some effectiveness, but it is really hard to justify the existence of any of these pages as stand alone articles, regardless of how much click-bait style articles the editors are using to source the material. Reading through the talk page on the Obama impeachment article is rather interesting, watching editors trip over themselves trying to find a way to justify both removing the Obama page, while defending the Bush or Cheney pages. I say remove them all.RTShadow (talk) 16:34, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Irrespective of the outcomes of these efforts, these pages document historical facts well-reported in reliable sources. bd2412 T 16:49, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Efforts to impeach George W. Bush. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to rtsp://video1.c-span.org/15days/e071008_kucinich.rm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100218032405/http://feralhouse.com/titles/kulchur/35_articles_of_impeachment_the.php to http://feralhouse.com/titles/kulchur/35_articles_of_impeachment_the.php
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081029115506/http://feralhouse.com/titles/images/BushImpeachment.pdf to http://feralhouse.com/titles/images/BushImpeachment.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:01, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Categories: