Revision as of 08:29, 9 October 2019 view sourceLectonar (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators43,293 edits →Uncharted 4: A Thief's End: cmt← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 01:17, 30 December 2024 view source Cyberbot I (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors1,718,181 edits Clerking main page and moving requests to appropriate subpages.Tag: Manual revert | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<noinclude><!-- Please put protection templates *inside* the noinclude, because this page is transcluded --> |
{{noadminbacklog}}<!-- Do not hide or modify this, a bot named "Cyberbot I" will manage it automatically.--><noinclude><!-- Please put protection templates *inside* the noinclude, because this page is transcluded. -->{{Short description|Wikimedia noticeboard for requesting protection of pages}}{{/Header}}{{Floating link|class=sysop-show|Administrator instructions|Administrator instructions}}{{pp-move-indef|small=yes}}{{#ifeq:{{PROTECTIONLEVEL:edit}}|autoconfirmed|{{pp|1=vandalism|action=edit|small=yes|expiry=}}}}<!-- Put interwikis at the Wikidata entry and categories in /Header instead of this page --> | ||
__FORCETOC__ |
__FORCETOC__</noinclude><!-- Do not hide or modify this, a bot named "Cyberbot I" will manage it automatically--> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT THIS PAGE. The formatting is enforced by Cyberbot. To make changes, please contact Cyberpower678. --> | |||
⚫ | <!-- Please copy the following example code to add a new entry at the bottom of the correct |
||
⚫ | <!-- Please copy the following example code to add a new entry at the bottom of the correct subpage: | ||
=== ] === | === ] === | ||
* {{pagelinks|Example |
* {{pagelinks|Example}} ~~~~ | ||
~~~~ | |||
--> | --> | ||
== Current requests for increase in protection level == | == Current ] in protection level == | ||
⚫ | {{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/Button protect}}{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/Increase}} | ||
<!-- DO NOT PUT NEW REQUESTS HERE. GO TO THE SUBPAGE ABOVE --> | |||
=== ] === | |||
* {{pagelinks|1=Opinion polling for the 2019 Portuguese legislative election}} | |||
'''Temporary semi-protection:''' High level of IP disruption; IP ] has taken over the article and keeps adding the same homemade content in a clear violation of ], ], ] and ]. ]<sup>]</sup> 17:27, 8 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
:{{RFPP|aiv}} ] (]) 05:59, 9 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
=== ] === | |||
* {{pagelinks|Visa Waiver Program}} | |||
'''Semi-protection:''' persistent IP vandalism. ] (]) 20:02, 8 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
=== ] === | |||
* {{pagelinks|1=Human nose}} | |||
'''Temporary semi-protection:''' Persistent ]. ] (]) 20:42, 8 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
===]=== | |||
* {{pagelinks|Uncharted 4: A Thief's End}} | |||
'''Temporary semi-protection:''' Edit warring since 4 October, with one editor warring against a couple of others, despite an ongoing discussion on the talk page. I've just failed a GAN at the article (the nominator is the main one warring) – not quite at 3RR, but a locked article should focus things on the talk page. – ] (]) 20:55, 8 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
:{{RFPP|d}} Semi-protection would have no effect. Warn and report to ANEW, not inclined to cut off all editing due to only two users. ] (]) 02:49, 9 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
::Bringing this one back: that's an unsatisfactory response. For a start it's at least three users, and it's been going on for over three days. Report to ANEW? I've clearly stated that it doesn't rise to 3RR (it's spread over more than 24 hours, which means it'll get bounced out of there straight away and I'll be accused of forum shopping). If you want to enable edit warring, that's fine, but at least make sure you get the facts right in your dismissive statement. - ] (]) 07:18, 9 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
:::{{RFPP|n}} 3RR is just a limit for occasions when an edit war is happening fairly quickly, but it is not per se the definition of "edit warring", or a prerequisite for a report at ANEW. Edit wars do occur frequently without breaking the three-revert rule. I am with ST47 here...a report to said board would be the better solution imho, as the disruption doesn't (yet) warrant full protection. ] (]) 08:29, 9 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
=== ] === | |||
* {{pagelinks|1=Tyson Foods}} | |||
'''Temporary semi-protection:''' Persistent ] – Vandalism by several IPs and new users within past week. ] (]) 23:18, 8 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
:{{RFPP|nea}} Was a spike around the 7th. ] (]) 06:05, 9 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
=== ] === | |||
* {{pagelinks|1=Salvador Panelo}} | |||
'''Temporary semi-protection:''' Persistent ] – Persistent vandalism of the spokesperson of a controversial president. ] (]) 23:29, 8 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
=== ] === | |||
* {{pagelinks|1=Activision Blizzard}} | |||
'''Semi-protection:''' Persistent ]. ] (]) 06:24, 9 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
*'''Automated comment:''' One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—]<small><sub style="margin-left:-13.5ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">]:Online</sub></small> 07:43, 9 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
=== ] === | |||
* {{pagelinks|1=William Mitchell Ramsay}} | |||
'''Temporary semi-protection:''' Persistent ] – Not sure why school children Utah have taken an interest in the subject, but it has not been constructive. Perhaps a month of protection will suffice. ] (]) 06:52, 9 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
=== ] === | |||
* {{pagelinks|1=Mihirakula}} | |||
'''Temporary semi-protection:''' Persistent ] – An IP-hopper falsifying "Etymology" section since August 2019. They always add their personal commentary to that section, e.g. see this recent diff and revision history. ] (]) 08:13, 9 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
== Current requests for reduction in protection level == | |||
⚫ | {{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/ |
||
== Current |
== Current ] in protection level == | ||
⚫ | {{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/Button unprotect}}{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/Decrease}} | ||
{{See|Misplaced Pages:Edit requests}} | |||
<!-- DO NOT PUT NEW REQUESTS HERE. GO TO THE SUBPAGE ABOVE --> | |||
⚫ | {{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/ |
||
== Current ] to a protected page == | |||
Create a level 3 header with a link to the article in question, then a {{((}}Pagelinks{{))}} template and then the reason. It looks like this: {{pagelinks|Example}} ''your request here.'' <code><nowiki>~~~~</nowiki></code> | |||
{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/Button edit}}{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/Edit}} | |||
<!-- DO NOT PUT NEW REQUESTS HERE. GO TO THE SUBPAGE ABOVE --> | |||
== Handled requests == | == Handled requests == | ||
''A |
''A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at ].'' |
Latest revision as of 01:17, 30 December 2024
Wikimedia noticeboard for requesting protection of pages "WP:RFP" and "WP:RPP" redirect here. You may also be looking for Misplaced Pages:Requests for permissions, Misplaced Pages:Requesting copyright permission, or Misplaced Pages:Random page patrol.Noticeboards | |
---|---|
Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes. | |
General | |
Articles, content | |
Page handling | |
User conduct | |
Other | |
Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards |
Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here. | ||
---|---|---|
Shortcuts
Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection) After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level Request unprotection Request a specific edit to a protected page Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here Request edit |
Archives |
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 |
Current requests for increase in protection level
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level Request protection ShortcutsPlace requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Suchir Balaji
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IPs changing suicide to murder without sources. ''']''' (talk • contribs) 12:40, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
2025 New Orleans truck attack
Reason: BLPCRIME vandalism. Borgenland (talk) 13:35, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
2023 Asia Cup
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing from multiple IPs. Annh07 (talk) 14:13, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—Talk to my owner:Online 15:10, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Malinaccier. Favonian (talk) 15:30, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Michael Myers (Halloween)
Temporary semi-protection: Despite two previous protections, LTA User:Jinnifer continues to attempt to make the same repeated edit they have for months, using IP addresses. NJZombie (talk) 16:04, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked: 135.84.203.253 (talk · contribs).
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:15, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level Request unprotection ShortcutsBefore posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
ShortcutsRamkripalyadavg
Reason: Request unprotection We are unable to create an article for this....... . Janufff (talk) 02:45, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Janufff: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—Talk to my owner:Online 02:52, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Janufff: Make a draft for this. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v 02:52, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Not unprotected – Please create a sourced version of this article in a subpage or your userspace. When this is done, please make the request again, or ask any administrator to move the page for you. Favonian (talk) 14:04, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Show Me series
Reason: It was recreated same other page article Cardinals vs Royals closed as redirect at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Cardinals–Royals rivalry (3rd nomination) I think this protection is no longer need because no one gonna use this page anymore since is deleted per CSD G4 applies. 173.219.25.75 (talk) 06:15, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Insofar as I can actually grok this request, that isn't an argument for unprotection; in fact repeated deletions (of any sort, not just G4) is grounds for a salting. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v 08:56, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Not unprotected – Favonian (talk) 14:05, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Request a specific edit to a protected pagePlease request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here Request edit Shortcut
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}}
,{{Edit template-protected}}
,{{Edit extended-protected}}
, or{{Edit semi-protected}}
to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Misplaced Pages:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}
template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Misplaced Pages:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Baahubali 2: The Conclusion
I would like to request that... (The upper range of Bahubali 2's gross is stated as 2500 crore. This is incorrect as only one source mentions it and even there the insinuation is that both part 1 and 2 collectively did this number.) . Darius bactria (talk) 10:20, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Talk:Baahubali 2: The Conclusion is not protected. Favonian (talk) 14:00, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/Archive.