User talk:Centrx: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 19:28, 4 December 2006 editMusical Linguist (talk \| contribs)13,591 edits →Edit War at User:Certified.Gangsta ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 21:08, 13 November 2024 edit undoBD2412 (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, IP block exemptions, Administrators2,448,763 edits Notification: listing of SI at WP:Redirects for discussion.Tag: Twinkle
Line 1:		Line 1:
			Centrx, I have reblocked you under the authority of the Arbitration Committee. This new block was placed with talk page access removed. If you would like to appeal this block and/or the removal of your admin rights, please email us at arbcom-l{{@}}lists.wikimedia.org. Thank you. ] <sup>(]/]/])</sup> 23:44, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
	{{TOCright}}
	<center>
	{\| style="border: 1px solid #ffc9c9; background-color:#FFFFF3"
	\|- padding:1em;padding-top:0.5em;"
	\|<center>This is a <span style="white-space: nowrap"><span>Wi<!-- Misplaced Pages -->ki</span><span>pedia</span></span> user talk page, not an encyclopedic article.</center>
	<center><big>'''<span class="plainlinks"></span>'''</big></center>
	*If you leave me a message, I will generally reply here unless you ask otherwise.
	*If I leave you a message, you may reply there unless it was not recent.
	*Please sign your messages with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>.
	\|}
	</center>

	==~~=Archives=~~==		== Email ==
	{\|
	\|
	*]
	\|
	*]
	\|
	*]
	\|
	*]
	\|
	*]
	\|
	*]
	\|}

			{{you've got mail}}
	== Saxo Bank ==

			== A bowl of strawberries for you! ==
	I noticed your comments on the ] wiki page, and I was wondering if you could also evaluate ]
	It seems like they are basically two different companys in the same industry
	--DrewWiki 05:52, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
	:] has the same problem with sources and unknown notability, though it is not written like an advertisement. —]→] • 05:55, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

			{\| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
	== ] ==
			\|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" \| ]
			\|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" \| i like it subhaskhajanchi 10:32, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
			\|}

			== ] ==
	I have added some sources concerning the notability to ]. --] 13:04, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

			I recreated the redirect ], which it appears you only deleted because it's original creator was a sock. If that wasn't your reason feel free to re-delete. ] (]) 08:56, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
	I also try to add content (see talk page and article ), but it is very annoying when ] always tries to start some fight. Sorry, I had to revert his new/old/new/old edit in his favourite External link section . Is there a chance that someone moderates his ]? I have no problem to ] under the same conditions. --] 00:54, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
			:and ]. ] (]) 09:03, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
			::Centrx has been desysopped and blocked without access to this page; he won't be responding. --''']]]''' 16:34, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
			== ] of ] ==
			]] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].Hammer<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> <span style="color:green">'''Ten Pound Hammer'''</span> • <sup>(])</sup> 15:55, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
			==MfD nomination of ]==
			], a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ] and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of ] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> ] ] 21:32, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

			== C.I.N. ==
	What is the reason that all three of you seem to be interested only in this article? —]→] • 01:16, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

			Hi Centrx. I noticed you deleted the page for ] ] group ] quite some time ago. Is there any particular reason why? This is a notable group whose article I wanted to contribute to, who put ] on the map and not only do sites like '''allmusic'''<ref>http://www.allmusic.com/album/94-mobstas-mw0000967032</ref><ref>http://www.discogs.com/CIN-94-Mobstas/release/477810</ref><ref>http://a1yola.com/c-i-n-richmond-roulette/</ref><ref>http://www.discogs.com/CIN-Richmond-Roulette/release/843264</ref><ref>http://www.cduniverse.com/search/xx/music/pid/1495619/a/richmond+roulette.htm</ref><ref>http://www.mtv.com/artists/b-dub-from-the-mob-cin-presents/</ref><ref>http://www.rapmusicguide.com/item/20/C.I.N._Richmond_Roulette.html</ref><ref>http://www.allmusic.com/album/world-war-1-the-mixx-tape-mw0000309428</ref><ref>http://cdtrrracks.com/bid3683713.html</ref> cover the group significantly, but the subject is covered by ] ] and ] standards and backed up by other internet sources like ''Rap Music Guide'' and there are ''probably'' multiple hip hop magazine print sources out there in referencing or reviewing the music that have yet to be dug up. ] (]) 00:59, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
	:Please have a look at ] and you will see that I am also interested in other articles (also in the ) when there is enough time... Only someone disturbs constructive work all the time, and that leads to endless talks like this one. That particular person has a very long list of contributions, please have a look at that, too, and then compare the quality of the edits. And since this is definitely not the first time we try to explain this, please have a closer look at the you recently deleted. It is all explained over and over. Another good read is that section on ]. Next question, please ;-) --] 02:28, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

			;References
	:And while we are talking here ] '''claims some copyright problem he is not able to prove and the link to panotools.org for the n-th time'''. Can someone please block him? He has a real world copyright problem on his site panotools.info, and that is the reason why the link to his domain is deleted from the Panotools article on Misplaced Pages. He doesn't know the difference between terms like trademark and copyright, copies content wherever he is not stopped and builds a ] to fake members of his non existent group. but he is not able to accept that. --] 02:47, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
			{{reflist}}

			== A barnstar for you! ==
	Please block ] from editing here on the Misplaced Pages. His group took the PanoTools groups copyrighted resources to start their group. They violated the Yahoo Groups Terms of Service by using our groups member list and sent a false and deceptive e-mail to our members saying the group has moved. ]

			{\| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
	Centrx, I won't revert his latest . This already leads to another little edit fight and I don't want to end on the ] page). May I just point you to ''']'''. It's not possible to insert all the information that Wuz and I parked on the talk page today into the article with those endless crap over the links. And no, that's no reason to delete the link to panotools.org since it's a valuable resource. John has no interest in creating a good article. --] 03:55, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
			\|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" \| ]

			\|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" \| '''The Original Barnstar'''

			\|-
	The two authors posting here (Carl & Thomas) were part of a small group of PanoTools members that used our member list, use our group name and advertise they are the new PanoTools group. They have taken the PanoTools archives and wiki. Just look at the page hit counts between wiki versions and you will see that the PanoTools group is the caretaker of the original PanoTools wiki project. They left an establisted group to start another of their own free will. The were never ban or asked to leave.
			\|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" \| make youtr own emial dont let someone chilling you at that.......... mathews 18:48, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

			\|}
	I have tried to add content here but Thomas and Carl delete, revert or redirect all my contribution. (view history of the ] page. ]

	The content on the PanoTools site is property of the PanoTools group members. The NG group has taken these resources without permission.

	Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:John_Spikowski"

	== ] ==

	This case is now closed and the results have been published at the link above.

	Fresheneesz may be placed on probation if he continues to disrupt policy pages. Such action shall be by a successful motion at ] by any member of the Arbitration Committee after complaints received from one or more users.

	For the Arbitration Committee --] 03:46, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

	== All Saints Academy ==

	hey, why was the All Saints page deleted from wikipedia? Me and a few other people from the school had spent a lot of time editing the page with newer information.
	:This article contains no reliable sources independent of the school. Misplaced Pages is not a directory of schools. —]→] • 22:06, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

	== ] ==

	Why was the article for this topic deleted?!?!
	:If you are referring to ], it was deleted because Misplaced Pages is an encyclopedia, the articles of which must be verifiable in reliable published sources independent of the subject. —]→] • 22:14, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

	I do not know what the 'Seven Sorrows' you are speaking of, I am referring to the Stan Lee online comic called "The 7th Portal" -- as can be found here (not the article in question, but an archive of T7P webisodes): http://www.stanleereturns.org/7thportal.php -- which was linked to the Stan Lee article
	:Responded at ]. —]→] • 00:21, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

	== ] ==

	Please see this talk page, I've made a suggestion about the template which is worth considering. --] 01:25, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
	:Responded there. —]→] • 06:36, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

	==Special Request==
	Hi, since you're awake, and aware of the background, would it be possible to Sprotect ] ? The IP's are starting to turn up...] <font color ="green">]</font > 06:56, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

	Note: It's not actually bad, yet...I'm just anticipating a flood : ) ] <font color ="green">]</font > 06:59, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

	:I don't think I am familiar with this...? —]→] • 06:59, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

	Of course you're not; I'm losing my mind and my vision at the same time. I was somehow convinced that you placed the tag at the top of . I have no idea why...I'm really losing it. Please disregard, I promise I'll get some therapy, or at least some sleep. ] <font color ="green">]</font > 07:04, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

	== Hello- Your Revision Was Appreciated.... Mine Was Blocked! ==

	Recently Gwernol removed my addition of a non DMOZ listing, and ignored my request that DMOZ not be the only listing reference as it has been a CLOSED directory for years riddled with problems or self interested editors.(Misplaced Pages article).

	When Gwernol (admin) complained about an alternate refernce which unlike DMOZ had articles, and was NOT advertising site, I corrected the link and discussed it... Updating it to the exact article which was a longer URL. Within mili-seconds I was "Blocked" and Gwernol assumed the worst, and used his advantage as a speed admin to block my correction, frustrating my good efforts... to fix the problem.

	It was very upsetting and the site is Misplaced Pages, not GwernolPedia.. he had an ethical obligation to read the changes and notes.. before showing his swiftness at Wiki!

	Please review my last change and the link and determin if it was appropriate for Gwernol to not have checked!

	Thanks..

	Link to history with Gwernol and my corrections

	] <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]){{#if:15:54, 3 December 2006 (UTC)\| 15:54, 3 December 2006 (UTC)\|}}.</small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->

	== Removing. ==

	Hello! Please don't take offense in my saying but, why did you remove my "deception"? I don't mind that it's gone but only if there is some kind of rule saying I shouldn't have it. I'm sorry for the inconvenience and misunderstanding. Cheers! (Could you respond on my talk page, please? Thanks!) </font></font>—<font style="background:white" size="1">''''']''''']]]</font> 18:37, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
	:Sorry, but I just think you should reply to his/her quary since the rules say that you shouldn't edit smeone's user page unless if you have their consent. ] 22:22, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
	::I know the rules quite well, and that does not apply in this case. —]→] • 22:22, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

	:::I for one would like to know the reasoning behind the removal as well. -- ''''']'''''] <small>22:25, 3 December 2006 (])</small>

	The purpose of user pages is to facilitate contributions to the encyclopedia. They are not for juvenile practical jokes. —]→] • 22:28, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

	== Why is John Zachman protected? ==

	I understand that the material was deleted because of copyright violation, but wouldn't it have been simpler, and kinder, to have simply replaced the article with a few words and a pointer to the copied URL, plus references to his book, the Zachman framework, etc. I believe John has quite enough stature in his chosen area of the IT business to be "notable", and this way colleagues and admirers will be free to add material if they wish. ] 19:10, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
	*The copyvio had been repeatedly re-created over several months.
	*The text was an unorganized dump. It was not even clear what the person did, let alone if he was notable.
	—]→] • 20:14, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

	== Re: Portmanteau ==

	Thank you for your post! I'm glad someone read my pet-peeve list :) I didn't know the facts behind your first point, and I 100% agree with your second point concerning the wikilink usage. I've never been able to express so academically or clearly the reasons that use of ''portmanteau'' should go, so I haven't taken much action, but I think you've said it just right. Any ideas on what wording we can replace it with? -- ] (]) 19:47, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
	:"combination" or "blend". "Blend" is the right linguistic term (and some ]-fan merged it into that article, which was totally inappropriate, if anything the merge would be the other way around and we would be rid of it), and has a clear meaning, but "combination" still has the right meaning and is also understandable. Also, in some cases no replacement word is necessary; the sentence has sometimes been a mutated cludge just to fit in the favorite word, like "it is a portmanteau word derived from a combination of the words..." and things like this can often be replaced with just a straightforward sentence like "derived from". Also, Misplaced Pages not being a dictionary, it would be quite fine to simply say that "'''Televangelism''' is ] ]". A problem someone related to this is the cluttering of the introduction with pronunciations and etymologies; to correct this, I have been thinking about making a template to include this information. —]→] • 20:28, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

	== ] and the ] ==

	Hi Centrx,

	you were used by a contributor ] engaged in a content dispute on the ] page to block me via a sockpuppet address using bogus IPvandal notices so that he representing the organization and its interests can dominate the page. You locked the page and removed the evidence I presented to you.

	*I put in a request to have the page unlocked, I would like you to do so. The difference of opinion is not vandalism.

	Thank you. ] 22:53, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

	:You do not appear to be blocked. The page is protected against edits by new and unregistered users. —]→] • 22:56, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

	== Edit War at User:Certified.Gangsta ==

	He's removing your warnings and reinstating the deceptive banner. ]] 23:17, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
	:Don't worry about it. —]→] • 23:23, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

	Do you mind explaining your page move on wigger? How is your 1 second block on me justified?--] 00:02, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
	:The 1 second block is so that you cannot remove the administrative warning. --] <small>]</small> 00:03, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
	:I did not move the page; I redirected it. Misplaced Pages is not a dictionary. The 1 second block is explained in the block summary, and is to record the warning that you removed from your talk page, to ensure that this sort of behavior does not slip by unresolved. —]→] • 00:05, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

	I don't see you in any position to block me since we're in a content dispute. The page history is itself an archive. Also note that, your edits on "Chinese" have been reverted by another admin. You are also wrong since wigger is not necessarily an ethnic slur so your page move seems more or less personal opinion. people who are unaffected by hip hop culture fail to understand the meaning of the term. Wigger is not derogatory. It can be a compliment. Some rappers are self-proclaimed wiggers. Merging this article to a List of ethnic slur is very offensive to the people who use the term in good faith and distort a lot info. for people who are really wanting to know the meaning of the term. It needs to be cleanup not merge.----] 00:08, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
	:Aside from the fact that a content dispute does not begin by you accusing the other party of vandalism and threatening to have them banned, I have little interest in the minutiae you are arguing. Chronic revert warring is not allowed. Accusing established editors of vandalism and threating to have them banned is not allowed. Whatever the term "wigger" means, you can add that to . —]→] • 00:18, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

	Centrx, I'm very concerned at your one-second block of Certified.Gangsta. Removal of warnings is discouraged, but not forbidden, and the block seems an inappropriate form of intimidation, regardless of your intentions. As I said ], people have the right not to have their block logs tainted for trivial reasons. In that section of the Noticeboard, there was no support for the idea of giving one-second blocks. The argument is sometimes made that warnings need to be left in place in order to save time for RC patrollers who might want to know if a vandal has been warned before reporting him at ], but in the case of a logged-on user who isn't a vandal, there's no urgency. It's not as if he's adding the word "poop" to four articles every minute and you need to see all the previous warnings before blocking him. If you warned him for something, and he removed your message, you could simply keep an eye on him. There's absolutely no need to force him to keep displayed on his talk page something that he doesn't want. And the bad feeling that might potentially arise from the practice of admins giving one-second blocks in order to enforce something that isn't even policy by far outweighs any possible benefits. Please, ''please'' don't do that again. By the way, I know nothing of his history. Your accusation that he spends a lot of time revert warring and making false accusations of vandalism may well be accurate, in which case I wouldn't oppose a ''proper'' block for disruption, provided that warning was given. But a one-second block for removing warnings, for someone who must already have been annoyed at others descending on his talk page, could ''never'', in my opinion, be justified. ] ] 19:28, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

			== Template talk:Short pages monitor ==
	== Votes ==

			You may be interested in the discussion at ]. —] (]) 23:43, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
	Most were left bare intentionally. At most, I can share privately by email - if you care - but I submit you're a grown wo/man and can figure it out. I'll be happy to share if you direct specific questions. - <b>]</b><small> ]</small> 00:55, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
			== Htpp listed at ] ==
			]
			An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Htpp'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you have not already done so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> - ] ('']'') ('']'') <small>(Formerly '''TheChampionMan1234''')</small> 09:53, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
			== Nomination for deletion of Template:Dated copyvio ==
			]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> <span style="color:green">'''Ten Pound Hammer'''</span> • <sup>(])</sup> 19:20, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
			== List of fictional gynoids and female cyborgs listed at ] ==
			]
			An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''List of fictional gynoids and female cyborgs'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you have not already done so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> <sub><small>] (])</small></sub> 22:57, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

			== ] ==
	== Miami Coral Park High School ==

			Hey! If you're interested, I started a ] for the game '']''. Feel free to add any or add your own!-]<span style="background-color:#ff0000; color: #e8ff00"> (])</span> 04:55, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
	Not that I disagree with you deleting the article, it really was possibly the worst one out there, but the article was part of an entire group of articles about every public high school in the Miami Area, and now it's missing, so I'm just here to say that I may go ahead and rewrite that page (not restore it, but rewrite it anew) that way it's the not the only school missing from the list, so if you see it pop up again with me as author, then don't redelete it, unless you have any objections, then feel free to voice them! Thanks. -- ] / <sup><font color="blue">]</font></sup> / <sup><font color="blue">]</font></sup> 02:16, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
	:Considering it is just going to sit there for another year gaining dust, and it is going to be a maintenance hassle due to all the vandalism, I doubt that's a good use of your time, or a good use of time for anyone trying to correct errors later. It makes more sense to get rid of the template that makes it falsely appear like there is some important gap in coverage. —]→] • 02:19, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
	::It would be better to merge all the verifiable information into one, good article on the Miami-Dade public school system rather than have several articles with no reliable sources. —]→] • 02:21, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

	== * poke * ==		== Template:User Christian ==

			Why has tl:User_Christian repeatedly been deleted? There are comparable {{tl\|User Muslim}}, {{tl\|User hindu}}, {{tl\|User Buddhist}}, {{tl\|User atheist}}, {{tl\|User Catholic}}, {{tl\|User Orthodox Christian}}, as well as countless other user templates where users can self-identify: {{tl\|User LGBT}}, {{tl\|User humanist}}, {{tl\|User Skeptic}}, {{tl\|User nihilist}}, etc. — <span style="font-family:gill sans">]</span> ] 20:59, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
	--<small>] ]</small> 11:45, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
			== "]" listed at ] ==
			]
			The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink\|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 13#SI}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> ] ] 21:08, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 21:08, 13 November 2024

Centrx, I have reblocked you under the authority of the Arbitration Committee. This new block was placed with talk page access removed. If you would like to appeal this block and/or the removal of your admin rights, please email us at arbcom-llists.wikimedia.org. Thank you. Hersfold 23:44, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Email

Hello, Centrx. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

A bowl of strawberries for you!

i like it subhaskhajanchi 10:32, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Contains

I recreated the redirect Contains, which it appears you only deleted because it's original creator was a sock. If that wasn't your reason feel free to re-delete. Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 08:56, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

and Gives. Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 09:03, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Centrx has been desysopped and blocked without access to this page; he won't be responding. --Rs chen 7754 16:34, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:The Battle Hymn of the Republic

Template:The Battle Hymn of the Republic has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.Hammer Ten Pound Hammer • 15:55, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Wisepiglet/North American Union

User:Wisepiglet/North American Union, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/User:Wisepiglet/North American Union and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Wisepiglet/North American Union during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 21:32, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

C.I.N.

Hi Centrx. I noticed you deleted the page for hardcore gangsta rap group C.I.N. quite some time ago. Is there any particular reason why? This is a notable group whose article I wanted to contribute to, who put Richmond, California on the map and not only do sites like allmusic cover the group significantly, but the subject is covered by WP:MUSIC WP:BIOG and WP:CALIFORNIA standards and backed up by other internet sources like Rap Music Guide and there are probably multiple hip hop magazine print sources out there in referencing or reviewing the music that have yet to be dug up. Ben0kto (talk) 00:59, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

References

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	make youtr own emial dont let someone chilling you at that.......... mathews 18:48, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Template talk:Short pages monitor

You may be interested in the discussion at Template talk:Short pages monitor#Need to define and possibly rethink this template. —Anomalocaris (talk) 23:43, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Htpp listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Htpp. Since you had some involvement with the Htpp redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 09:53, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Dated copyvio

Template:Dated copyvio has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • 19:20, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

List of fictional gynoids and female cyborgs listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of fictional gynoids and female cyborgs. Since you had some involvement with the List of fictional gynoids and female cyborgs redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 22:57, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedians who like NationStates

Hey! If you're interested, I started a series of userboxes for the game NationStates. Feel free to add any or add your own!-🐦Do☭torWho42 (⭐) 04:55, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Template:User Christian

Why has tl:User_Christian repeatedly been deleted? There are comparable {{User Muslim}}, {{User hindu}}, {{User Buddhist}}, {{User atheist}}, {{User Catholic}}, {{User Orthodox Christian}}, as well as countless other user templates where users can self-identify: {{User LGBT}}, {{User humanist}}, {{User Skeptic}}, {{User nihilist}}, etc. — the Man in Question (in question) 20:59, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

"SI" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect SI has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 13 § SI until a consensus is reached. BD2412 T 21:08, 13 November 2024 (UTC)