Misplaced Pages

User talk:Timeshifter: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:25, 4 December 2006 editTimeshifter (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers50,392 edits Regarding reversions made on December 03, 2006 to [] article← Previous edit Latest revision as of 05:06, 25 December 2024 edit undoMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,135,113 edits Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 26: new sectionTag: MassMessage delivery 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Skip to bottom}}{{Misplaced Pages:WikiSloth/topicon}}{{NoAutosign}}{{Tinc}}
Hello Timeshifter! ''']''' to ]!


== Top ==
Here are some tips to help you get started:
{{hatnote|'''Note.''' If you want a pageviews link in the '''tools menu''' see ]. For a pageviews link '''below all article and talk page titles''' turn on Xtools at the bottom of the appearance section of ].}}
{{skip to TOC}}
{{Babel|en|fr-2}}
{{message
| border-color = #9998ff
| bgcolor = #fffdf9
}}
{{Ds/aware|acu|ps}}
{{collapse top|Subpage Index. Prefix is User talk:}}
{{Special:Prefixindex/User talk:Timeshifter/}}
{{collapse bottom}}
----
{{Signpost-subscription}}
Just another guy with a PC. See my Commons user page: '''].'''<br>
'''''The Signpost, Tech News, The Bugle,''''' and '''''Centralized discussion''''' are transcluded on this page: '''].'''


User talk here is not archived. Old talk is deleted. '''Users are allowed to remove anything from their talk pages. See ]''' and other wikipedia guidelines/policies. Like Misplaced Pages articles over time, people change, and there is little point in referring to past stale arguments and discussions.
* If you haven't already, please add your name to the ] to let others know a little about yourself.
* Read the ], and feel free to experiment in the ].
* Eventually, you might want to read the ] and ].
* If you need ], post a question at the ] or ask me on ].
* Explore, ], and, most importantly, have fun!


'''To keep the discussion in one thread some comments added here are moved to the user talk page of the author.''' I reply there. I also watchlist that talk page for awhile in order to note when the user there replies. Harassing comments are also sometimes moved off this talk page. Sometimes the original author is offended by their own harassing comments, and my reply, on their user talk page. They then remove both from their talk page. I guess the light from their own verbal reflection offends them. One can find removed comments by using the history link on a talk page. Inappropriately-applied warning templates, etc.. are also removed from this talk page. '''Sometimes I remove stuff from my talk page for no particular reason, or for many varied reasons.''' Removal of comments from my talk page implies nothing. Don't take it personally. Unless I have requested otherwise, feel free to leave new messages on my talk page.
Good luck!<br/>
] ] 23:19, 9 October 2005 (UTC)


----
P.S. One last helpful hint. To sign your posts like I did above (on ], for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type &#126;&#126;&#126; (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (4 tildes). You should always sign talk pages (also called "discussion" pages), but not articles.
----
----
----


__TOC__
==New Pro-cannabis userbox==
{{User:Disavian/Userboxes/pro-cannabis|stamp|right}}
If you would like to have this on your userpage, just add '''<nowiki>{{User:Disavian/Userboxes/pro-cannabis}}</nowiki>''' to your userpage, and the box at right will appear on it. Also, if used in your user space, the page will be listed on ]. If you would like to share it with someone else, type '''<nowiki>{{User:Disavian/Userboxes/pro-cannabis|stamp|right}}</nowiki>'''


== Once again, help!! ==
Also, consider weighing in on the ].


I had an image from Flickr from a photographer I just dealt with. He made the mistake of changing his copyright license to a Creative Commons one--but not one we accept. I took his word for it that he removed copyright in favor of Creative Commons, but since I'd just uploaded two of his photos with a correct one we accept, it was my oversight that he made a mistake and I didn't check it. The result of this was that the photo was not accepted in Commons for upload. Fine. But now I can't get the damned thing to upload it now that the license is correct! How '''RUDE'''. I've been uploading photos for years- more than any other editor I know of on the en.wikipedia. It is for this photo: . How can I fix this? --] (]) 14:38, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
Stand up and be counted while you still can,


:You have GOT to be the coolest Wikisloth with super-powers that I ever met!! For a Sloth, you sure move at a quick pace!! :) Do you wear a "super cape", I wonder? That would really complete the whole outfit and mystique.. I keep trying to think of things I could maybe do for you since you are such a blessing and a help... Hmmm. Did you ever contact ] before his untimely demise? Is there perhaps a photo of someone that I can search for on your behalf? Just say the words. I feel a great debt to you for your help over these years. --] (]) 12:00, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
] 16:49, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
==License tagging for Image:Incarceration rates worldwide.gif==
Thanks for uploading ]. Misplaced Pages gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Misplaced Pages, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an ] applied to the ] indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.


== Boyd Bushman Entry Deleted ==
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
*]
*]


Could you believe the dark hearts won in deleting this entry? And now an article I started is also up for deletion by some nobody called LuckyLouie. --] (]) 21:24, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
This is an automated notice by ]. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at ]. 01:03, 26 August 2006 (UTC)


Timeshifter, would you be able to give your honest opinion regarding the deletion of Boyd's page? I think my suggestions at the discussion are fair and at least his memory as a scientist should be in wiki, regardless of the mention of any alien stuff. --] (]) 20:19, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
:The image is in the public domain. The November Coalition statistical graphs page says "These graphs are in the public domain." Near the bottom of the page. http://november.org/graphs - It seems there is currently no suitable category in the drop-down menu of the wikipedia image uploading page for this. Someone else had the same problem. See . They were told it was OK, and to put the template {{tl|PD-release}} on the image page. --] 01:26, 26 August 2006 (UTC)


Not sure if you or someone else is working on reintroducing this entry. I'm also not sure if you've come across this .


The has two U.S. Airforce contracts; and with many independent source citations.
==Incarceration==
Thanks for your intervention. I don't think this is as serious as it might initially appear because it only happened, I believe, because an image link had two external links in it, which is very unusual. I've always been impressed with AWB's ability to deal with nested ]] and ], I will pass this detail on to the developers. I will also scan for other occurrences to check for other errors. Thanks again. ''] ]'' 09:13 ] ] (GMT).
:Yep, I found, I think, about 24 articles with two or more nested s, only a few had ISBNs, so I was able to ensure the problem did not re-occur for this project. And of course programmers count "0, 1, many" so I hope that AWB will be made perfect soon! Any comments to my talk page please. ''] ]'' 11:06 ] ] (GMT).


It is interesting how other deleted pages usually have a trail of information, but Boyd's has nothing. I didn't get to read what the final verdict was ( other than obvious deletion ). --] (]) 21:38, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
:::You said also that Smackbot caused the image not to show up due to 2 external links being in an image caption. One of the links was at the end of a caption. ISBNs were not a part of this particular problem. But are you saying that 24 images did not show up after that run of Smackbot? And has the problem been fixed? I need to know whether I can put 2 external links in a caption, especially if one link is at the end of the caption where the brackets stack up and confuse the bot. What about 3 or 4 external links in a caption? Does the problem only occur if one of the links is at the end of the image caption? --] 19:24, 31 August 2006 (UTC)


== Van Morrison song ==
::::No I forget the details, but I think one other article had been broken, possibly. The problem with the tool has been fixed ] by the main developer and author of the tool, so apart from people using old versions, which won't last long (the tool itself will insist on being updated), you should be fine to put what you like. In fact you shouldn't worry too much anyway because it's easy to roll back an edit if needed. ''] ]'' 20:28 ] ] (GMT).


I might have been buzzing through the disambig. page for the Van Morrison/Robbie Robertson song, "Caravan", seen here: ] which they played during the filmed final concert "The Last Waltz" - if it's just my need for glasses please forgive me. Hopefully I'll have a computer soon. --] (]) 11:10, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
:::::Thanks. It looks like the problem has been fixed. The other note about it on the same page says that the problem was occuring with just one external link in the caption too, if the link was at the end of the caption. But it has been fixed in any case.--] 11:32, 1 September 2006 (UTC)


== Photo from sr: wiki == == New discussion system ==


What you saw was Flow.
Yes, photo was taken in Belgrade, and it is Global Million Marijuana March first in Belgrade in 2005. Correct month i don't know but i can ask user who send that image about that. Licence for image is ]. --<small>]] &bull; </small> 19:45, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
* The WMF has been eliminating most of their talk pages (user pages and some major mainspace pages), so you're forced to use Flow if you want to contact them to discuss problems with their projects. A particular problem is that they switched over all official contacts points related to Flow itself! That is particular problem for discussing Flow bugs. (Writing about the bug *in* Flow triggers the problem!)
:I just find out that MMM was holded in May 7 2005 in Belgrade and that there was about 50 participators. --<small>]] &bull; </small> 19:51, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
* You've only seen the tip of the iceberg. The list of problems with Flow is 142 feet long. Copy-paste is broken. A simple revert destroyed my original comment. Problems with templates. History is a disaster. The reply-threading turns modest-size discussions into unreadable spaghetti. You can't delete your own comments, much less someone else's. (You "hide" it, which leaves a link for it on the board.) IMO the biggest issue is that Flow does not store an accurate stable copy of what you write! Flow can <u>randomly rewrite your formatting codes and nowikis etc.</u> The way Flow works is kind of like translating your text into Russian, then translating it from Russian back to English when someone views or edits it. Sometimes those bugs can mangle your entire post into garbage during the rewrite. In fact Flow preforms that round-trip translation every time you try to preview what you wrote. So you preview, return to editing your wikitext, and Flow has REWRITTEN your wikitext! It's like editing on quicksand. There's no "truetext", everything Flow shows you is an illusion created on the fly.
* It seems the WMF still wants to eventually get Flow deployed, but the good news is that they've realized that there are serious objections here. They have been *trying* to improve their relations with the community ever since the superprotect incident, with limited success. Putting Flow on hold has been one of the successes. The current official policy is that no Flow pages will be deployed without local consensus requesting it. I think they are hoping the tiny wikis start accepting it, and that eventually all the 'obstructionist-change-averse editors' get dragged along into the wonderful future. BTW there's a doc page where "Admins" and the most "Experienced" editors are defined as the change-averse groups. Lols.
* There used to be 7 Flow pages on EnWiki. Activity has dropped to zero on every board where Flow gets deployed. One board was the Flow testing board: it died and was never fixed after an admin tried testing admin tools on it. I had a pair of abandoned boards deleted at MFD. I have another abandoned board at MFD with unanimous deletes so far. I have an open RFC at a dead wikiproject to roll back Flow - I *think* its passing but running an RFC inside Flow is a disaster. We can't move the discussion posts down to a separate discussion area, it's almost impossible to tell who is replying to who, and it is difficult to figure out which posts are !votes. Anyway, assuming it passes, that will leave us with two dead Flow pages. It's possible that EnWiki will be Flow-free in a month or two. I need to contact some of the other language Wikis with Flow to see if they want to move forward with Flow or start rolling it back. ] (]) 17:28, 24 December 2015 (UTC)


::{{ping|Alsee}} Thanks for all the info on Flow! I had to look up MFD. I see that it is ]. Are there any wikis using LiquidThreads still? The WMF or the devs or whoever is in charge (I have no clue), take simple requests for improvement (such as watchlisting sections of talk pages) and then go crazy with complete rewrites of all the code. Same for the request for a WYSIWYG editor. I just wanted a simple WYSIWYG editor that did the simple stuff, and did it in article sections. But they went crazy and created this monster VE that edits the whole page, and tries to do everything the wikitext editor does and more. I just want VE lite for section editing. Bold, italic, links. --] (]) 13:01, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
== Iraq War infobox ==
Hey Timeshifter, sorry to be such a pain on the Iraq civ cas. I'm just trying to keep the infobox from becoming so long as to be unhelpful. Good edits to the Iraq civil cas, tho--very necessary and I'm glad there's finally someone who's making sure they're up-to-date. <font color="green">]</font> 20:26, 6 November 2006 (UTC)


== Invitation to chat about interactive maps ==
Were you the one who did all those great edits (such as mentioning where to get the info) for the Iraq casualties? If so, good work. ] 03:37, 3 December 2006 (UTC)


Hello, I’m Chris, a ] in the ] at the Wikimedia Foundation. One of the projects we’re working on is to bring ] to Misplaced Pages. If you are interested, I’d like to have an informal conversation with you about your work with ], and ] you all have created. I'd like to learn more about your work and how that might influence the design of interactive maps.
:thanks. I added some additional links to several Iraq casualty pages, and the casualty section of the infobox on the ] page. Also added some links, and some more hidden notes with links, for the template page: ] --] 03:55, 3 December 2006 (UTC)


Please let me know of some good times to chat via email and I can setup a meeting for us. I can be reached at {{No spam|ckoerner|wikimedia.org}}.
==Iraq War, Image stacking==
Can you descibe the problem you were having with "image stacking"? I never heard of this before and now the article isnt formatted around the picture, almost making it better to just remove the image for sake of layout and design. --]<s>]</s> 13:57, 10 November 2006 (UTC)


If you’re not interested, that’s fine. I would appreciate any direction to other editors that have been involved and might be interested.
== ] ==


Have a good day,
We cannot semi-protect a page to stop an edit war. If you are having problems you need to check out our dispute resolution process. Have a look at ]. Thanks—— ] (]) 18:43, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
] (]) 20:46, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
:Feel free to ask me questions on my talk page.


== Need your help with this missing Wikipedian- ==
--] 19:37, 10 November 2006 (UTC). I have moved the anonymous editor's comment to the discussion page for the ] article. This way other editors of the page can comment also. IBC discussion page:
*] --] 19:37, 10 November 2006 (UTC)


Hi, I don't know if there is a procedure to let people know when an editor quits to place a semi-retired placard on their talk page. In the case of Catfish Jim, one of my closest editing friends from the past, his talk page is looking like he's here, when it's just Admin and other bots that deposit info on timed intervals. To my knowledge, he hasn't been working since before I went into a coma three years ago. I think it's March 2012: . I'll leave this to you as an Admin. I'm only doing little edits and am still not healed so, if you don't do something with this, I hope you'll pass it to someone who will. Thanks. --] (]) 13:09, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
== Taba Summit ==


== "420" collaboration ==
Hello Timeshifter, I'm just letting you know that you are in danger of violating the ] policy on ]. If you revert one more time you could be blocked from editing wikipedia.- ] | ] 06:23, 3 December 2006 (UTC)


As a member of ], you are invited to help organize the project's upcoming ''']''', which is scheduled for April 2017. Yes, we're a few months away, but we're hoping to get the ball rolling by getting buy-in from experienced Misplaced Pages editors and seek help fleshing out some goals and ideas for a successful campaign. We also plan to conduct both on-wiki and offlline outreach so non-Wikipedias can also contribute. If you are interested in participating, please sign up and contribute to the ongoing discussions. All editors are welcome! ---] <sub>(])</sub> 16:55, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
:I did not revert. Your edit comment after deleting a whole section of a wikipedia page was "rv OR , we can not add controversial and unsourced material because you seem to think it is 'common knowledge')". By the way that section was written by several people, not just me. I first deleted the more controversial material since it was already covered by another wikipedia page. I added "citation needed" tags. You didn't like that and insisted on deleting the remaining part of that section. So I added the reference links you requested. I added quotes, too. So I don't see how you can claim original research now. See the between when you requested sourced material, and my addition of it. You then deleted the requested sourced material that you asked for. You just blanked that whole section in violation of the wikipedia policy on vandalism: ]. See talk page at ] before blanking again. --] 06:41, 3 December 2006 (UTC)


== Wishlist Survey & cross-wiki watchlist ==
:Your later edit comment was: "removing pov, your sources do not support your conclusion so this is still OR." There was no conclusion made after I added the sourced material. The section then consisted only of quotes with sources. But to further clarify I just added this sentence to the top of that section: "The issue of who ended the negotiations is disputed. There is no consensus. Here are some perspectives:" Feel free to add more perspectives. --] 07:02, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi Timeshifter, You said that you might not see my reply on Meta, so I'll talk to you here. :) I'm on the Community Tech team, and we're still working on the cross-wiki watchlist. As you saw, the cross-wiki watchlist was one of the top requests on the 2015 Community Wishlist Survey, and our team is responsible for working on it. It's still an active project for us. It's held up right now by some changes that we need to make to the database, altering the really huge and scary revision tables. We have to wait for permission and help from the database administrator to make those changes. That's a delay, which is a pain, but once we get that done, we'll keep making progress on the cross-wiki watchlist.


There's another five top wishes from last year's wishlist that we shipped last year, and we're currently working on a few top requests from this year's wishlist -- rewriting Xtools, and warning people after there have been unsuccessful login attempts. I'd be happy to tell you more about our team or the Community Wishlist, if you're interested. Let me know. -- ] (]) 23:42, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Adding citation requested tags does not give a green light to add original research. Furthermore, the references you added did not support the larger argument of the section, when you use references to prove a novel conclusion it is considered original research. It is a difficult policy to understand, I also had a lot of trouble with it when I first began editing wikipedia. Also, please do not accuse others of vandalism when it is obvious that it is not the case.- ] | ] 10:06, 3 December 2006 (UTC)


== Old editing toolbar (2006 version) ==
:There was no conclusion made after I deleted all the previous info in that section and only put quotes with references for them. Show me the conclusions in my last revision. BlueDome also asked the same thing on the talk page: "The section starts with 'The issue of who ended the negotiations is disputed. There is no consensus. Here are some perspectives:' I do not see other conclusions, what are you referring to?" And you have not discussed anything at all on the ] talk page yet. --] 22:39, 3 December 2006 (UTC)


Hey, Timeshifter, I noticed ]. The old toolbar that you posted a screenshot of: ]...is the 2006 editing toolbar, and within the last week or so, it was retired by the WMF. I'm working on reintroducing it as a user-made script, if you want it back; if you want it, you can install it by adding the line (without <nowiki><code></code></nowiki> tags):
--] 05:57, 4 December 2006 (UTC). Here below is of the section "Who ended the peace negotiations?" I had deleted all that was there previously. So there was nothing there from when you blanked the whole section. You did not blank this revision below. Amoruso did, though. 3 times in 24 hours. I pulled out and indented the reference links below, and put them in parentheses, so that people can see and follow them.


<code>mw.loader.load("/search/?title=User:Writ_Keeper/Scripts/legacyToolbar.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript");</code>
---
:The issue of who ended the negotiations is disputed. There is no consensus. Here are some perspectives:
:-
:] of the Israeli peace group ] wrote <ref name=uriavnery> . By ]. ]. Feb. 23, 2002.</ref>: "It was not Arafat who broke off the talks at this critical moment, when the light at the end of the tunnel was clearly visible to the negotiators, but Barak. He ordered his men to break off and return home."
:::(. By ]. ]. Feb. 23, 2002.)
:-
:A ] page <ref name=pbs> .</ref> has this:
::But they had run out of political time. They couldn't conclude an agreement with Clinton now out of office and Barak standing for reelection in two weeks. "We made progress, substantial progress. We are closer than ever to the possibility of striking a final deal," said Shlomo Ben-Ami, Israel's negotiator. Saeb Erekat, Palestinian chief negotiator, said, "My heart aches because I know we were so close. We need six more weeks to conclude the drafting of the agreement."
:::(.)
:-
:From the '']'' David Matz writes <ref name=davidmatz> . By David Matz. ''].'' Vol.10 No.3 2003.</ref> concerning a joint statement <ref name=jointstatement />:
::The Taba negotiation began on Sunday evening, January 21, and ended on Saturday afternoon, January 27 . At the closing press conference, the parties issued this joint statement: “The sides declare that they have never been closer to reaching an agreement and it is thus our shared belief that the remaining gaps could be bridged with the resumption of negotiations following the Israeli election.”
:::(. By David Matz. ''].'' Vol.10 No.3 2003.)
:-
--- --] 05:57, 4 December 2006 (UTC)


...to ]. I'm hoping to get it introduced as an official gadget soon, but in the meantime, that should restore most of the functionality you're used to, I think. HTH, ]&nbsp;]] 18:10, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
== Regarding reversions made on December 03, 2006 to ] article ==


== Double ping ==
<div class="user-block"> ]
You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the ]. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.</div><!-- Template:3RR5 --> &mdash; ]<span class="plainlinks"> </span> 12:58, 3 December 2006 (UTC)


An edit summary mention produces a separate ping so I got two pings for . ] (]) 08:48, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
:Reverting blanking vandalism can be done as many times as necessary according to ]. The only question is whether it is blanking vandalism or not. Amoruso was not engaging in any discussion on the talk page, so it is blanking vandalism. I think you should be blocking him not me. In fact I request a block of Amoruso and Leifern since they are tag-teaming in their blanking vandalism. I went through all the blanking warning templates up to the final warning. According to ] I followed all the instructions necessary to make this request. Leifern took over for Amoruso and is not replying in substance to BlueDome. And Leifern is blanking still without resolving anything in discussion first. That is the polite thing to do. Talk first, and then make changes, before resorting to blanking first, and then non-substantial discussion later. --] 22:09, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
:Oops, sorry. :) -- ] (]) 09:22, 2 July 2019 (UTC)


== Student revision help ==
:Someone else is blanking that section without discussion on the talk page. Tewfik blanked what BlueDome put up in that section. I believe this comes under some kind of complex vandalism guideline. The "complex" link on ] goes to this page: ]. --] 22:33, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi! I am a student editing the page Incarceration of Women in the United States. I saw that you are a main contributor to the Incarceration in the United States article, so I was wondering if you might look over my article and give me any suggestions on what more I could work on? I have mostly focused my attention on the healthcare section, but I'm hoping to submit the entire thing for good article status, so I'd appreciate any feedback you have. Please feel free to post on my talk page!
Thanks, ] (]) 19:19, 13 November 2019 (UTC)


== question re your ideas on editors and various items ==
:I just checked the edit history again. Amoruso started the reverting of the completely new material in that section in question. There was nothing old remaining in that section after I replaced it. At that point no one had reverted anything 3 times in 24 hours. And Moshe did not revert that completely new section. It seems the blanking baton was passed to Amoruso. Amoruso was the first person to revert 3 times. It seems that his use of the word "non encyclopedic" in an edit comment, and on the article talk page, swayed your judgement more than my honest attempts at discussion on the talk page, and my use of the official blanking templates on the article talk page and on Amoruso's user talk page. I also mentioned the blanking in my edit comments. I think you blocked the wrong person. And I am appealing for a ruling from other administrators on this. The use of the phrase "non encyclopedic" should not give license to Amoruso to blank 3 times in a row. His edit comments also said "3RR" and "4RR", which were inaccurate. So I humbly say to you, Nearly Headless Nick, or Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington, I think you have been fooled. Amoruso first reverted the new material in that section. Then he reverted it 2 more times. His 3rd time was the time where he left the edit comment "4RR". When I reverted just after that it was my third time. That I admit to. But I thought reverting obvious vandalism allowed breaking the 3RR rule. From the ] page:


hi. I just happened upon one of your own userboxes. i would like to try to help out. particularly with issues of editor responses, admin conduct. could you please let me know where I can help out? if you reply here, please ping me. thanks!! --] (]) 16:07, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
::Blanking. Removing all or significant parts of articles (sometimes replacing the removed content with profanities) is a common vandal edit. However, significant content removals are usually not considered to be vandalism where the reason for the removal of the content is readily apparent by examination of the content itself, or where a non-frivolous explanation for the removal of apparently legitimate content is provided, linked to, or referenced in an edit summary. Due to the possibility of unexplained good-faith content removal, template:test1a or template:blank, as appropriate, should normally be used as initial warnings for ordinary content removals not involving any circumstances that would merit stronger warnings.


== Updating Template:COVID-19 pandemic death rates ==
:I believe a 2-word "non encyclopedic" edit comment, and talk page comment, is frivolous. And since Amoruso first broke the 3RR rule, I ask that he also be blocked for 24 hours, as I have been blocked. --] 00:30, 4 December 2006 (UTC)


I have created ] with instructions for updating ]. Please advise if you notice any errors.
:On checking the ] page again I find this: "If you violate the three revert rule, after your fourth revert in 24 hours sysops may block you for up to 24 hours. In cases where multiple parties violate the rule, sysops should treat all sides equally." I had not done a 4th revert. See the edit history and the above notes to see why. Amoruso had 3 reverts first, and then I followed with a 3rd revert. As I said above, I honestly thought Amoruso was engaged in simple blanking vandalism. He still hasn't really engaged on the talk page with anyone, including someone named BlueDome. BlueDome is not me, by the way. It seems there is a new series of blanking vandalism going on by Tewfik. I am not a part of that fight since I am blocked. Tewfik has not justified his blanking at all on the talk page. And it seems Leifern is not engaging honestly with BlueDome on the talk page. There are no conclusions as claimed by Leifern. See what I last had in the blanked section. It is posted higher up in reply to Moshe. Or go to . --] 19:21, 4 December 2006 (UTC)


I have included the VBA code of a Word macro to automate the later stages of the update. This should work just as well for ]. I tried to create a macro to automate the whole process, but either the program or my computer does not like large macros. ] (]) 13:33, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
---


It seems I am being blocked past the 24 hour period. When I try to edit pages I get a message that says I am autoblocked, and that to get unblocked I should put this template below on the bottom of my user page. --] 18:33, 4 December 2006 (UTC) :{{u|Dudley Miles}}. Thanks. Looks good. I adjusted and clarified a few things. Check history for explanations. I don't have MS Word. So I can't help there. I use freeware LibreOffice. Of that free office suite I only use Calc. And I am a beginner with it. --] (]) 17:02, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
::Thanks for your help. The explanation in the doc is much clearer after your changes. ] (]) 17:06, 5 September 2020 (UTC)


== Separate but related questions ==
:Buried deep on another page is something about 24-hour autoblocking starting when one tries to edit a page while blocked. If one has never been blocked before, then one does not know that one can't edit a page until one tries to edit a page. So then one reads their user page and finds out that they are blocked for a period of time. In my case for 24 hours. Then I come back after that 24-hour period and find that I am still blocked. Only by much searching through many wikipedia pages does one learn of this secondary autoblock that extends past the first 24 hour block. This is a great way for a blanking team to discourage people and info they dislike from getting on certain pages. Get a blocking newbie like me (with around a thousand edits and very few complaints against me) to revert their blanking vandalism 3 times in 24 hours, and then have to run this gauntlet of unintended (on wikipedia's part) harassment. It is time to change the autoblocking system so that people know they are being blocked for more time beyond what the block states on one's user page. Also, the sections defining simple vandalism need to be rewritten so that it is clear that blanking is not really considered simple vandalism that can be reverted many times in a day just as graffiti can be reverted as often as necessary. Blanking vandalism has to go through the warning template system, but spread out beyond the 24 hour period in order to avoid 3RR traps. Any editor can feel free to copy this info from my user page and use it in discussion concerning clarifying some of these wikipedia policies. --] 20:25, 4 December 2006 (UTC)


First I noticed that you undid the revision at ] however it doesn't seem you have implemented the changes from ] there yet so the table is now no longer scrolling with sticky headers. Are you still planning to re-add those features? If yes is there a reason you're waiting to implement them?{{pb}}Secondly, are you looking to create a table stylesheet that can be used to implement any of these features more generally, it seems to me this might be a good idea going forward if you are aware of any feature requests that have or are likely to recur.{{pb}}Apologies if this has been asked and answered elsewhere I don't really have time to read through any of those discussions in full at the moment; thanks for your help. {{ppor}}{{pb}}<span style="background-color:#EEE; font-size: 1.2em; padding:.15em .45em;"><b>]]</b></span> 00:12, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
:Autoblock lifted. It happened because you tried to edit while you were blocked. Tsk tsk... -- ] ] 20:04, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
{{pb}}Update: OK I just noticed the link to ] on the help talk page; I presume then that this supersedes ]? If so it should probably be redirected to the new table. Second question still stands; although as I mentioned earlier it will have to be a bit before I can start on it, thanks. {{ppor}}{{pb}}<span style="background-color:#EEE; font-size: 1.2em; padding:.15em .45em;"><b>]]</b></span> 00:44, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

:{{u|Quantocius_Quantotius}}. This has been moving very fast. There are now 3 table templates and 2 style sheets.
:2 of the table templates are tables that are on this article page:
:*]
:Those 2 tables use the same style sheet:
:*]

:The CSS style sheet you were working on is this one:
:*]
:It is now only used for this table template:
:*]
:That table template is in this article:
:*]
:'''That table is not supposed to be a scrollable table.'''
:I just updated some of the history here:
:]
:--] (]) 01:10, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

::Thanks for clearing that up. Well if things are moving fast I probably won't be much help. I may drop in briefly every now and then for the next 2-3 weeks but substantive projects will have to wait until towards the end of the month at least. So I'm about to log-out in a few minutes but if you hit me with a ping I'll see it sooner or later.{{pb}}<span style="background-color:#EEE; font-size: 1.2em; padding:.15em .45em;"><b>]]</b></span> 01:11, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

:::{{u|Quantocius_Quantotius}}. I am assuming that the ''']''' does not need the changes you made to it. Since those changes assumed it was a scrollable table. So I will revert your changes. Feel free to add back whatever you think is useful for a non-scrollable table. I haven't been working on that article and its template. Feel free to edit its CSS style sheet now that you know it is for a non-scrollable table.

:::I have been concentrating on the scrollable tables. Feel free to work on the CSS for those scrollable tables. I am a newb at CSS. I wish there was a collapse button to collapse the scrollable tables back to scrollbox size after they have been fully expanded by the "show all" button. --] (]) 01:27, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

::::Belatedly {{done}} please see ]. Let me know if there are any issues or if there are any other templates you would like this feature added to.{{pb}}Sorry for the delay, had a lot more IRL stuff to attend to than I anticipated. If I do get a bit of extra time I was planning on setting up a workspace on ] so we can try to work on some additional css features of general applicability, but I do ask for your patience. I'm already a bit overcommitted to stuff here considering the volunteer time I have available.{{pb}}<span style="background-color:#EEE; font-size: 1.2em; padding:.15em .45em;"><b>]]</b></span> 16:16, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

(unindent). Thanks {{U|Quantocius Quantotius}}! There is a problem though. The collapse button only works on the template page. I just noticed this concerning "Show all" too. It works fine on the template pages. But when the 3 templates are together on ''']''' the buttons only work on the top template. So I guess the classes below are not specific enough. I copied the wikitext below from your recent addition to '''].'''
<syntaxhighlight>
<div class="covid-show-table" style="font-size:80%;font-weight:500;">]]</div><div class="covid-collapse-table" style="font-size:80%;font-weight:500;float: right;">]]</div>
</syntaxhighlight>
I added the collapse part of the above wikitext to:
*''']'''
*''']'''
It works great on the template pages. But in the article with the 3 templates clicking any of the "show all" buttons in any table other than the top one does nothing. So the collapse buttons do not show up on the lower tables. Since they don't expand.

I created a sandbox just for you where you can experiment:
*''']'''
--] (]) 23:31, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

:I asked for help here:
:''']'''
:In the section currently titled: "Need help with multiple templated tables on the same page using the same styles.css"
:--] (]) 06:58, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

::Just noting for the benefit of page watchers that I have given a more detailed explanation over at ].{{pb}}<span style="background-color:#EEE; font-size: 1.2em; padding:.15em .45em;"><b>]]</b></span> 23:03, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

'''''Note:''' See further discussion here: '''].'''''

== Userboxes changes ==

Hey, sorry you didn't like the changes to your user boxes. I was confronted with some particularly anally retentive editors when I first started editing, and they advised me that the rules and guidelines applied to all of Misplaced Pages, not just the articles. So, I guess that is what gave me the impression I should make the changes, but I'm just as happy to leave them the way you had them since you didn't like the changes because I'm not currently retaining my anus. LOL.😀 ] (]) 02:22, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

== Global watchlist - Update 9 ==

<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:#606060; background-color:#f8f8f8; border-width:2px; text-align:left; padding:7px;" class="plainlinks">
Updates associated with ] and the ]:

Hi everyone. As I noted in the last issue, I received a grant last year from the WMF to develop the global watchlist script into an extension. ] has now been deployed on Meta. Visit ] to get started.

That grant has ended, and I have requested another grant to continue development of the extension, and figured subscribers of the newsletter about the user script might be interested. You can see and comment on the grant request at ] - if you support this, I hope you'll consider endorsing the request.

Thanks, --] (]) 00:28, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
----
<div align="center"> Global watchlist user script: ] &bull;&#32; ] &bull;&#32; ]<br>
Global watchlist extension: ]</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:DannyS712@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=User:DannyS712/Global_watchlist/Updates&oldid=21243702 -->

== Wikitext is not ... ==

The use of HTML in wikitext is in fact HTML.

# Please stop edit warring over this. This is non-negotiable.
# John is in the right on this point. You must provide compliant HTML for ].

Thanks. --] (]) 20:09, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

:{{u|Izno}}. I believe you are mistaken. Mediawiki software converts everything it sees into what it puts on the page. The browser sees none of what is in the wikitext until Mediawiki converts it to HTML, CSS, JavaScript, etc..
:<nowiki><ul></nowiki> in the wikitext in the case of side-by-side tables and/or images contributes nothing to accessibility.
:Side-by-side tables and/or images look exactly the same with or without <nowiki><ul></nowiki> in the wikitext.
:We can take this to ] if necessary for more info.
:] do not see wikitext. They only see what the Mediawiki software converts it too.
:And side-by-side tables and/or images look exactly the same to the browser and screenreaders with or without <nowiki><ul></nowiki> in the wikitext.
:Your solution of using a gallery for images is fine too. --] (]) 20:39, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
::I am not mistaken. HTML text in wikitext passes straight through the parser as HTML (both Parser.php and Parsoid) in all cases (with some HTML causing additional changes to how the parser deals with the contained text; &lt;pre> is a notable example). That is why we have an allowed list of HTML and CSS directly in the parser as part of Sanitizer.php: we do not want bad-faith actors to use HTML elements in malevolent ways.
::Subsequently, to provide valid HTML per the HTML standard, &lt;li> must be placed inside either &lt;ol> or &lt;ul>, whether in an actual HTML document or a MediaWiki wikitext document. Perhaps you did not understand the point that John was making.
::(N.b. I am not speaking to wikitext as wikitext just to be clear e.g. <kbd>*</kbd> at the beginning of a line.)
::Invalid HTML is usually, almost always, inaccessible HTML. ] (]) 20:51, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
:::If I may butt in: if y'all are talking about vs. , then I can definitely see a difference, in both the HTML output and the rendered output of the page. Timeshifter's edit is missing the surrounding <code><nowiki><ul></ul></nowiki></code> in the browser HTML, and in the rendered output (at least in my browser), the images are placed closer to the left margin. So it seems that John and Izno are correct. ]&nbsp;]] 21:04, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
::::{{u|Writ Keeper}}. See my reply to Izno. Also, John like Izno was talking about inaccessibility problems, not the left margin. John and I discussed this elsewhere. And he did not show any inaccessibility problems. He just suspected there might be some. --] (]) 21:25, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
::::The edit in question indeed. ] (]) 21:33, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
:{{u|Izno}}. As you said everything has to go through the parser, sanitizer, etc.. And in some cases the HTML is not allowed to be used. Some deprecated HTML for example. Some works. Some doesn't.
:In the case of side-by-side tables '''I am not seeing any inaccessibility problem.''' See:
:''']'''
:In this case <nowiki><ul></nowiki> serves no purpose except to mess up the left margin. Someone complained about this elsewhere. Removing <nowiki><ul></nowiki> fixes that problem, and it is more efficient code. Less to remember.
:'''It allows tables to fit in narrower screens too.''' Since there is no left margin. '''Narrow your browser window on the sandbox page to see.''' The '''horizontal scrollbar shows up sooner''' on the lower set of side-by-side tables that have <nowiki><ul></nowiki>
:'''What inaccessibility problem are you seeing?''' I see none '''when doing without <nowiki><ul></nowiki> in this sandbox case.'''
:--] (]) 21:19, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
::Yeah, no. Bold text that indicates an argument on how your device provides you content isn't how accessibility works. "I like less code" also isn't how we make decisions where accessibility is relevant. Much less conformant HTML. If you personally cannot remember that list item elements must be inside o/ul elements, then you specifically should not revert an editor correcting that issue; if you want to fix any particular display that you do not like, you need to ask how to do that, not revert. In this case, if you want to "fix" the left margin, the way to fix that is to set <code>margin-left: 0</code> on the list item elements. ] (]) 21:33, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
:::{{u|Izno}}. If you google '''<nowiki>style=display:inline-table</nowiki>''' you will see it used in many different ways. Many different ways without <nowiki><ul></nowiki>. I already knew about <code>margin-left:0</code>
:::I also already knew how to fix the problem without it. So I fixed it. You have yet to show me why my fix is incorrect. As in how it is inaccessible. --] (]) 21:44, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
::::You are barking up a totally weird tree if you think my concern has anything remotely to do with CSS display. I am strictly concerned about outputting both valid and accessible HTML, for which you must include ol/ul elements.
::::Regarding accessibility, it's not about you. It is specifically in regard to screen readers. ] (]) 21:50, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
:::::{{u|Izno}}. '''In my first reply to you, I mentioned ].''' You have yet to show me a problem with accessibility. There are many cases in wikitext that don't use the same full HTML that one would use as a webmaster. Long ago I did my share of basic web pages on Tripod, Angelfire, Geocities, etc.. So I know the difference. --] (]) 22:00, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
:::::Indeed, {{tq|'''What inaccessibility problem are you seeing?'''}} is ''precisely'' the wrong question when it comes to screen readers. ]&nbsp;]] 21:55, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
::::::Some people use screenreaders even though they have perfect eyesight. Some developers for example. But I take your point, and I ask everybody: '''What accessibility problems are you claiming?''' If you don't have a screenreader how can you claim anything unless someone with a screenreader tells you something? Send them to '''].''' Ask them if their screenreader detects any difference other than the left margin. --] (]) 22:06, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
:::::::Okay, first of all, it is not the responsibility of people who need accessibility aids to analyze a page for accessibility issues; it is ''our'' responsibility as editors (and as coders) to anticipate and address all such issues proactively. Second of all, look at this: : specifically errors 11 and 12 (further errors suppressed). <code><nowiki>li</nowiki></code> tags are invalid HTML when used the way they are. (Granted, there are a ton of other errors, too, but that doesn't mean it's okay for us to throw a bunch more onto the pile; an analogy to ] comes to mind.) As Izno points out, screen readers parse the HTML structure of a page to present it to their users, and any invalid HTML can cause problems for screen readers; thus, it is incumbent on us as editors to avoid invalid HTML wherever possible, because being proactive about avoiding accessibility issues is our responsibility as editors. We should ''not'' wait until a person who depends on a screen reader to complain; if they complain, ''we have already failed''. I don't think "I like the margin padding better" is reasonable as an excuse to use invalid HTML, especially when the same effect can be accomplished with valid HTML, and "I think the HTML looks better" is ''certainly'' not a reasonable excuse. Do better. ]&nbsp;]] 22:30, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
::::::::I think you are making my case. There are 597 errors on that page. And additional warnings. HTML always has this problem. That is why we have transitional HTML versions, and so on. There will never be perfection.
::::::::Until we get someone with a screenreader to check out the sandbox '''(]),''' we are talking in circles. Mediawiki would be paralyzed if it held up everything until every single change in the mediawiki code was run by someone with a screenreader. And I have heard from someone with a screenreader who pointed out that a Mediawiki problem he experienced was annoying, but that the alternative was worse because it only helped him, but made things seriously worse for far more people. So everything is a balance. I find it annoying that you, John, and Izno are all going on strictly your suspicions, but without any evidence of a problem. I don't think there will be a problem. Screenreaders have no problem with basic tables with a single row of headers. As long as they have captions. That is what we have at ]. See if you can round up someone with a screenreader. I will too. --] (]) 23:00, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
:::::::::Okay, so this conversation is indeed going around in circles, but I think it's for different reasons than the ones you're thinking. You started out by saying there was no difference in the page between your version and JohnFromPinckney's version: {{tq|Side-by-side tables and/or images look exactly the same with or without <nowiki><ul></nowiki> in the wikitext.}} That is demonstrably false, though; there is both a visible difference and a difference in the HTML output. When this was pointed out to you, you said {{tq|In this case <nowiki><ul></nowiki> serves no purpose except to mess up the left margin. Someone complained about this elsewhere. Removing <nowiki><ul></nowiki> fixes that problem}}. So, now, you're saying that you see the difference (in the left margin), and are remivng UL tags deliberately to fix that. But you see how that does not correspond with what you said forty minutes earlier and ten lines above, right? You're moving the goalposts. Now, you're demanding that a person who uses a screen reader come in and prove to you that there's an accessibility issue. But it should not take a blind person with a screenreader to tell you that you're messing up the page to convince you to stop inserting invalid HTML into a page. If there are hundreds of HTML problems with a page, we don't fix it by adding ten more. And honestly, ''the rules of how HTML works'' should be the baseline for any conversation about HTML in Misplaced Pages, even before we get into any questions about accessibility. The burden of proof is on ''you'' to justify why you're breaking the rules of HTML, and "I don't like the margin (which can be fixed with valid HTML)" and "it's nine bytes less code" does not cut it. ]&nbsp;]] 00:42, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

(unindent). I have been clear all along that other than the left margin, the '''visible''' output is the same. Both versions are side by side tables that wrap. Someone else on the Help:Table talk page complained about the left margin. They did not like all the clutter of using '''<nowiki><ul style="margin-left:0px;"></nowiki>''' to get rid of the left margin. I experimented and noticed that getting rid of <nowiki><ul></nowiki> altogether got rid of the left margin. '''This allowed side by side tables to work in narrower screens with simpler wikitext. It is all on the talk page.''' You keep thinking that HTML in wikitext has to follow all the rules of HTML elsewhere. According to '''''' <nowiki><p></nowiki> without <nowiki></p></nowiki> is malformed HTML. But ] says: "Note that the closing tag {{tag|p|c}} is not strictly necessary for MediaWiki installations that output HTML 5 (such as Misplaced Pages)." There are many other examples of allowed HTML use in wikitext that does not follow the HTML rules elsewhere.--] (]) 02:00, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
:...Okay, I'm not sure how this isn't clear yet, but none of us are concerned about what the HTML looks like ''in the wikitext'' (i.e. in the edit box, when you're editing the page). Of course ''that'' doesn't have to be valid HTML, because it hasn't gone through the Mediawiki parser to become true HTML yet. What we're all talking about is the ''output HTML of the rendered page'' (i.e. what you see if you view the page like a reader would and right-click to view source). The edits you're making are causing errors in the ''output HTML'', *not* the wikitext. As I explained on VPT, the example you give eith the <nowiki><p></nowiki> tag is not a relevant comparison. The reason the page says that the closing p tag is optional is because, when the wikitext containing an unclosed p tag goes through the Mediawiki parser, the parser will automatically close the p tag for you. So, while there is an unclosed p tag in the ''wikitext'', there is no unclosed p tag in the ''output HTML'', because the parser fixes it for you. But the parser does ''not'' fix orphaned li tags in the same way, so using li tags without an enclosing ul tag will lead to invalid HTML in the ''output HTML'', not just the wikitext. You can see this in action here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/api.php?action=parse&page=User:Writ_Keeper/sandbox . Notice how, although there is an unclosed p tag in the wikitext, the p tag is properly closed, and thus valid HTML, in the HTML code that the parser outputs. They're not the same thing. ]&nbsp;]] 02:20, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
::There is lots of other stuff that ends up in the output HTML that is not perfect HTML. Deprecated HTML, etc.. Others in the VPT thread have pointed out various examples. As I have said several times, if it doesn't effect anything then it doesn't matter. You have yet to show that this lack of <nowiki><ul></nowiki> here effects anything in a negative way. --] (]) 02:30, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
:::Both ] and ] detect the version with ul as containing HTML lists but do not detect the HTML lists in the version without ul. Please do not use the latter version. Also, screen readers don't normally detect margins. ''']'''] 02:42, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
::::Thanks ]. I am confused though since technically there are no lists at all in either section. There are just 2 side by side tables in each of the 2 sections.
::::But no problem. We no longer need that method that uses the list HTML of li and ul.
::::] found a simpler solution that only uses divs. It is elegant, legal, and simpler. I pasted it in as a third section on that sandbox page:
::::]
::::--] (]) 02:56, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
:::::Sounds good re divs. Technically there are lists in the section that contains ul ... that is exactly what the ul tag does; it creates an unordered list. Whether it's *semantically* appropriate is another thing entirely ... but a list should be marked up properly in any case. ''']'''] 03:02, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

(unindent). ]. So your screen readers read the divs option OK at ]? Or below? I pasted it below so that others reading this thread can check it out too.

<div style=display:inline-table>
{{Static row numbers}}
{| class="wikitable sortable static-row-numbers" border=1 style=text-align:right
|+ Total number of matches played in official competitions only.
|-
!Player
!Matches
!Goals
|-
|style=text-align:left|]
|'''407'''
|0
|-
|style=text-align:left|]
|'''364'''
|1,875
|}
</div>
<div style=display:inline-table>
{{Static row numbers}}
{| class="wikitable sortable static-row-numbers" border=1 style=text-align:right
|+ Total number of goals scored in official matches only.
|-
!Player
!Goals
!Matches
!Average
|-
|style=text-align:left|]
|'''1,875'''
|364
|5.15
|-
|style=text-align:left|]
|'''1,570'''
|330
|4.76
|}
</div>

Everybody: Narrow your browser screen to see the tables wrap (one drop below the other). Works in mobile view too. --] (]) 03:19, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
--] (]) 03:19, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
:Yes, it works fine. ''']'''] 03:33, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

== New link for the table section ==

Hi!
Sorry if I'm bothering you.
I am new to Misplaced Pages and wanted to contribute to the site.
I noticed that the external links at the bottom of the table help page contains webpages that allows you to make tables only from inputting data directly into the website.
I was wondering if it was Ok for me to add a link to a webpage that makes tables that allows user to upload excel files and convert it to the wiki format and vice versa.
Thanks!
--] (]) 17:12, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

:{{u|Rangusangus}}. What is the link? I will have a look at it. It might also be posted here:
:* ]: Chart and graph resources at Commons
:* ]: includes information on converting table markup.
:--] (]) 21:33, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

{{reply to|Timeshifter}} Sorry to keep you waiting! I found the website here: http://www.excel2wiki.com/ Looks like it was originally excel2wiki.net but was changed to the current one ] (]) 03:15, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

:{{u|Rangusangus}}. See: ]
:It links to the:
:'''.'''
:--] (]) 06:09, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

{{reply to|Timeshifter}} The '''.''' and the other one at ] are different as they only supports ctrl + c/v to paste the table and the the other (www.excel2wiki.com) supports uploading excel files directly on the website. --] (]) 08:57, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

:{{u|Rangusangus}}. Have you used this converter? Does it work?
:Also, I noticed that the page loads very slowly. And it doesn't scroll vertically. My taskbar covers up the last line of the page:
:"For any problems, contact me at nguye586@purdue.edu"
:I can only see it if I lower my font size.
:--] (]) 18:41, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

{{reply to|Timeshifter}} I have used this converter before and can confirm that it works. Personally, I find it more convenient than the other converters, especially for larger tables as it requires a file upload than copy pasting. It also has options for single quote and double quote tables.
: I managed to contact them and they said the scroll button should be fixed now.
: For the loading problems, I don't have a problem on my end so it might be a geographical issue where the webpage is hosted.
: --] (]) 14:13, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

::It takes forever to load. Now it is cut off at the top.
::I looked at the HTML page source.
::I suggest you contact them, and tell them that maybe they should remove the style sheet and ''class="centered"''. Also remove the script at the bottom.
::Then it will be a normal plain web page that fits to the screen.--] (]) 18:15, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

{{reply to|Timeshifter}} Can you take a look at the website now? They said the problem should have been fixed. Loading times are still normal for me. --] (]) 04:43, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

:It no longer is messed up. But it takes 20 seconds to load. Please ask them to remove as much external styling and scripting as possible. Try using inline styling instead. It is just a simple web page, and shouldn't take 20 seconds to load. --] (]) 05:46, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

{{reply to|Timeshifter}} They said there were a minimal amount of external styling and scripting and there was nothing too fancy.
: I tried to test the website on 2 speed checking website and the average load time was 0.5 seconds. https://imgur.com/a/ilrc8Ub
: Can you try to access the website using this link instead? https://www.excel2wiki.com/
: If the issue still persists, could you check the speed of the website using online speed checker tools to see if its a website issue or a local issue.
: On my end the website is working fine. I will forward an email to them again if its still not working on your end.
--] (]) 09:39, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

::{{u|Rangusangus}}. It is the same 20 seconds in Firefox. Edge is fast. Half a second.
::This is out of my league. Maybe ask for help at toolforge.com
::That is the domain for this other excel2wiki tool:
::https://excel2wiki.toolforge.org
::toolforge.com redirects to here:
::https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/Portal:Toolforge
::Maybe host the tool there. Or get some help from there.
::--] (]) 11:49, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

== Misplaced Pages Wars and the Israel-Palestine conflict...please fill out my survey? ==

Hello :)
I am writing my MA dissertation on Misplaced Pages Wars and the Israel-Palestine conflict, and I noticed that you have contributed to those pages. My dissertation will look at the process of collaborative knowledge production on the Israel-Palestine conflict, and the effect it has on bias in the articles. This will involve understanding the profiles and motivations of editors, contention/controversy and dispute resolution in the talk pages, and bias in the final article.
For more information, you can check out my or my , where I will be posting my findings when I am done.
I would greatly appreciate if you could take 5 minutes to fill out ''before 8 August 2021.''

Participation in this survey is entirely voluntary and anonymous. There are no foreseeable risks nor benefits to you associated with this project.
Thanks so much,

Sarah Sanbar

] <sup>]</sup> <sub>]</sub> 11:01, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

== Article help ==

Howdy Timeshifter,

I really appreciate the hard work you've out in to It's a great article. One thing I would like to comment about: some passages are a bit informal.

For example: '''"Around 100,300 died in the 12 month period ending April 30, 2021. That's 275 a day."'''

Would you agree that this declarative '''"That's 275 a day"''' seems a bit informal? Would it bother you if I changed the lead to something like '''"Around 100,300 people died in the 12 month period ending April 30, 2021, at a rate of 275 deaths per day."'''? I don't want to ask you to do anything because I know you're such a busy contributor.

Regardless, Happy New Year! -- ] (]) 22:30, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

:{{u|Hunan201p}}. Thanks. Either way sounds fine by me. Feel free to change it. Let's keep further article related discussion on the article talk page. --] (]) 00:20, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

== A barnstar for your efforts ==

{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | {{#ifeq:alt|alt|]|]}}
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" |'''COVID-19 Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Awarded for efforts in expanding and verifying articles related to ]. Awarded by ] ] 8 March 2022 (UTC)
|}
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | ]
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Original Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Awarded for being the top contributor to an article related to ]. Awarded by ] ] 8 March 2022 (UTC)
|}
:{{u|Cdjp1}}. Thanks for the barnstars! --] (]) 03:43, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

==Happy Seventeenth First Edit Day!==
<!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## -->
{| style="width: 80%; margin: 4px auto; padding: .2em; border: 2px dashed #FF0000; background-color: gold;"
| style="text-align:center;" |]
| style="text-align:center;" width="100%"|<span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS; color:darkblue">Hey, '''Timeshifter'''. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the ]!<br />Have a great day!</span> <span class="nowrap" style="font-family:copperplate gothic light;">] (])</span> 18:46, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
| style="text-align:right;" |]
|}
== Timeshifter hi. Question. ==

I am hoping I am doing this correctly. I saw your comments on Raw Story and agree with them.I am sorry but I do not have an account and hope this is the correct place to respond. I will also answer you on the other page.

Can you PLEASE --- whenever you have time take a look at Palmer Report? There has been a Misplaced Pages attack from some republican editors. They are a political site -- a good one and I am a fan.

For months (years) scores of people have been pleading with the editors there to take the "hyper partisan, fake news website" out of the header. It is not accurate. It was put there by the same person who muddied up Raw story -- a republican. I along with dozens -- literally dozens of people protested. We felt it was an attack, a vicious one. The response was always send some reliable sources to counter it.

Only nobody ever used the term "hyper-partisan, fake news website" in the first place. I spent four hours trying to find a source and asked several times. There are some obscure republican sources. They never used, to the best of my knowledge any of those terms.

They also locked the page when people tried to change it and called it vandalism. But everyone I saw came in good faith. The Palmer Report is not fake news and is very much like Raw Story. I had a source -- Brian Williams from MSNBC did a segment several tears ago and used information from their site. I was told that was not interesting enough to put on the site and then they ignored me and all the others. You an easily see this through old Talk pages because there are over a dozen complaints.

I hope you are not upset that I posted such a long post but I think what is happening makes Wiki look very bad and I liked what you said on the raw story site. I do not want to name the person less it be thought of as a verbal attack but you can see all this quite easily. Please if you can do anything, please research this and please look seriously at the "hyperpartisan, fake news" entry. Because that is not neutral.

Thank you,
#### Norah
] (]) 00:33, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

:Hi Norah. I don't have the time, health, and energy nowadays for much Misplaced Pages activity. You will get a lot farther if you log in with a user name. You are still anonymous. You can create an account with just a user name and password. Email address is optional, and is not public. Useful for password resets. It can be a secondary throwaway email address. Gmail can be set to forward to another email address. Even another Gmail address. --] (]) 00:59, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
::Thank you. I am sorry about your health issues. I will not bore you with a long reply but I have tried in the past as have others and nothing worked. Was delighted to see how several of you fixed Raw Story who I also like. But I am completely unaware of how to edit on Wiki and also have some (minor) health issues. But thanks! At least you care and that counts for a lot. I hope your health situation improves and thank you so much for answering.
:: #### Norah ] (]) 04:16, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

== Editing news 2023 #1 ==

<i>] • ]</i>

This newsletter includes two key updates about the ] team's work:

# The Editing team will finish adding new features to the ] and deploy it.
# They are beginning a new project, ].

'''Talk pages project'''
]

The Editing team is nearly finished with this first phase of the ]. Nearly all ] are available now in the ].

It will show information about how active a discussion is, such as the date of the most recent comment. There will soon be a new "{{int:skin-action-addsection}}" button. You will be able to turn them off at ]. Please ].

]

An A/B test for ] has finished. Editors were ]. The Editing team is enabling these features for all editors on the mobile site.

'''New Project: Edit Check'''

The Editing team is beginning ]. It will help people identify some problems before they click "{{int:publishchanges}}". The first tool will encourage people to add references when they add new content. Please ] that page for more information. You can ] to learn more.

–] (]) 18:19, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Whatamidoing (WMF)@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:VisualEditor/Newsletter&oldid=1140143809 -->

== Global xwiki watchlist ==

Hello! Was looking into some of the history of and proposals for a global watchlist, and saw quite a few comments on it by you in the past. Is there a current solution or commonly accepted tooling for this purpose? Thanks! ] (]) 06:49, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
:{{u|Top5a}}. I don't know. I haven't been keeping up with it. --] (]) 08:03, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
::OK! Thank you for the rapid reply! Cheers -- ] (]) 08:05, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

== Some stroopwafels for you! ==

{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ]
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | I realize we have been butting heads (in good faith!) a bunch recently. But I wanted to stop by and just say I appreciate the work you do maintaining tables across the website, ensuring text-citation integrity, and helping others understand how to maintain the encyclopedia. Thank you, and happy new year! Enjoy this ] – I saw "stroopwafel" in the WikiLove menu and <em>needed</em> to see what one is. They look delicious, but I can't say I've heard of one before, much less tried one :)

Best, <b style="font-family:Courier New;">]]</b><sup>]</sup> 02:56, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
|}
:Thanks! --] (]) 03:10, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

== Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 25 ==

<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:#606060; background-color:#f8f8f8; border-width:2px; text-align:left; padding:7px; border-radius:1em; box-shadow:0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75);" class="plainlinks">
Hey there, welcome to the 25th issue of the Misplaced Pages ], covering all our favorite new and updated user scripts since {{#formatdate:2024-03-01|dmy}}. We've got a ton of wonderful editors taking back their pitchforks today. Don't worry, for they come in peace, to forcibly fix and extend existing scripts you use with sheer passion. There's so many, them forks have got what's basically their own column now! <small>gift us with some rows before it's too late</small> ] (]) 04:01, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

] <small>Got anything good? Tell us about your new, improved, old, or messed-up script ]!</small>

{{columns-start|num=3}}
===] Featured script===
: ''']''' by ''']''' is this edition's featured script. By loading diffs inline on every page that shows a list of changes, it implements the 2023 community wish ]. Hopefully we won't need this script anymore soon, with the WMF's ]...

===] Improve a script===
* Many of our favorite scripts such as ], ] and ] haven't been updated for Vector 2022. You could be the one to change that!
* ] works, but its UI looks alien. Someone could improve it...
* To a lesser extent, the same goes for ]. I wish someone would integrate the sorts into the sort menu instead of adding 11 portlet links.
* We want...
:* ...watchlist notices support for ]
:* ...a tool to automatically fix ]s, preferably a fork/addition to ]
:* ...a fix/fork of ] to make it work

===] Requested scripts===
* Automatically delink all duplicate links within the same section per ].
* Collapsible parentheses in body text, which had ] and was accidentally moved to ] by me. Oops!
* An easily configurable script to add a link to the #p-vector-user-menu-overflow portlet with a name, target, and icon. This one should be a relatively easier one. I would do it myself, but I'm too busy rotting away on ].
* ], with perhaps ] used for inspiration.
* ...and many more, all available at ]. ] and ] have been the most active on the page in the past five months.

{{column}}
]
]

{{column}}
===] Updated scripts===
* After the <ruby>RIIJ<rp>(</rp><rt>rewrite it in ]</rt><rp>)</rp></ruby> update, ]: ] has a dismiss button that allows you to mark an item as read in one click and cycle to the next Watchlist item.
* ] is just like Enterprisey's script, except you select your status from a dropdown instead of cycling through them with a button. The WMF operates out of car-centric infrastructure anyway. Shame!

===] Newly maintained scripts===
* ] has created ] from ]; {{their|Aaron Liu}} fork adds a config variable to automatically highlight duplicate links on the loading of any page where the portlet link would've appeared.
* ] expands the powers of ] to include common procedures done with the art of moving pages.
* On a holiday? Somewhere? Gotta learn ye ABCs? ] puts the fun into ] with a quadruple more statuses. That starts with a C!
* In our continuing trend(s?), ] forks ] to make it work. Sadly, this is the end of our lexicographic combo.
* ]:
** ] is a fork of ] for ].
** ] is a fork of ] with automatic calculation of the destination archive subpage and with support for non-Vector skins.
* Quite coincidentally, ] has been forked from ] to work with the ].
* ] forks the same thing but also no longer nonsensically prepends {{tl|clear}} to page archives.
** ].
{{columns-end}}

===] New scripts===
<!--The current convention is to use the ] notation for scripts added by someone other than the script author and ]: ] for scripts the author adds themselves. Of course, you are always free to ignore all rules.-->
* ]]] ]: ] adds a different padlock topicon for each level of move-protection.
* ] can help you mark talk pages of inactive users with {{tl|not around}}.
* ] automatically tags talk pages of pages you've copied between with {{tl|copied}}.
* ] adds text labels (which default to emoji) to user links that label the user's usergroups. Wow, that's a mouthful
* ] adds a Twinkle-style dialog for alerting users about contentious topics.
* ] automatically tags articles translated from other places with appropriate attribution.
* In the defense of the 'pedia, the humble ] adds the ] status to the toolbar.
* Tired of staring at a bunch of filtering text and waiting for darn filter logs to load? ] can parse abuse filters into a visual syntax tree and evaluate locally on-demand!
* ] finds references with the same link and displays the number of them along with a button to add the {{tl|duplicated citations}} tag under the references section. Being lazy has never been easier!
* fastest gun on the net ] really quick add to contribution lists three buttons awesome
* ] is a quick and easy way of responding to {{tl|help me}} requests.
* Per ], ] converts all citation titles to... title case, unfortunately.

----
{{center|{{flatlist|
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
}}}}
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:TechnoSquirrel69@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Scripts%2B%2B/Subscribe&oldid=1235236317 -->

== please i beg you , help me with this table ==

Greetings, Time Shifter. I hope you are well. I am working on building a table on how the island of Hispaniola ended up being transformed into two states: the Dominican Republic and Haiti with collapsible sections and images of each stage.

I have tried to make it myself with the little knowledge of codes that I know. I am writing you in the hope that you can help me. I have seen in your profile some beautiful tables with collapsible sections.

]

please help.

take care ] (]) 06:23, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
:{{u|Risantana}}. I copied the infobox tables onto my profile page. I did not create them. Try asking for help at ]. --] (]) 06:33, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

==Happy First Edit Day!==
<!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## -->
{{ombox
| name = First Edit Day
| image = ]
| imageright = ]
| style = border: 2px solid CornflowerBlue; background: linear-gradient(to right, #a8ff78, #78ffd6);
| textstyle = padding: 0.75em; text-align:center;
| plainlinks = yes
| text = <big>'''Happy First Edit Day!'''</big><br />Hi Timeshifter! On behalf of the ], I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made and became a Wikipedian! ] (]) 02:58, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
}}

== Better table ==

I edit the table at ], look same as ]. Ask now for help. ] (]) 14:14, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
:{{re|GAMERBOY102}} I added ]. What are you trying to do there? I might be able to help. See also: '''].''' It also has a search form for table help at the top of the page. --] (]) 18:33, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

== I want to add ] for ] ==

Help for our tables now! ] (]) 00:07, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
:{{u|GAMERBOY102}}. I don't think that is a good idea there. The table is already very wide. Even a narrow column of static row numbers is too much. Columns should be removed, not added. Or the table divided in half. --] (]) 02:28, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message ==

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:06, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1258243333 -->

== WikiProject Human Rights Revival ==

Hi! I recently posted at ] about the lack of activity on the project and its being labeled as "semi-active". I noticed that you are a member of the project, and would like to get your input if possible. See ] on the Talk page, and if you have insight into possibly reviving the project or have any thoughts about it, feel free to comment. Thanks! ] (]) 22:33, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

== Administrators' newsletter – December 2024 ==

] from the past month (November 2024).

]

] '''Administrator changes'''
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
}}
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
}}
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
}}

] '''Interface administrator changes'''
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
}}
:] ]

] '''CheckUser changes'''
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
}}

] '''Guideline and policy news'''
* Following ], the ] has been updated. All former administrators may now only regain the tools following a request at the ] within 5 years of their most recent admin action. Previously this applied only to administrators deysopped for inactivity.
* Following a ], a new speedy deletion criterion, ], has been enacted. This applies to template subpages that are no longer used.

] '''Technical news'''
* Technical volunteers can now register for the ], which will take place in Istanbul, Turkey. is open from November 12 to December 10, 2024.

] '''Arbitration'''
* The arbitration case '']'' (formerly titled '']'') has been closed.
* An arbitration case titled '']'' has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case will close on 14 December.

----
{{center|{{flatlist|
* ]
* ]
* ]
}}}}<!--
-->{{center|1=<small>Sent by ] (]) 16:20, 3 December 2024 (UTC)</small>}}
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators%27_newsletter/Subscribe&oldid=1259680487 -->

== Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 26 ==

<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:#606060; background-color: var(--background-color-neutral-subtle, #f8f8f8); color: var(--color-base, #202122); border-width:2px; text-align:left; padding:7px; border-radius:1em; box-shadow:0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75);" class="plainlinks">
Hello everyone, and welcome to the 26th issue of the Misplaced Pages ], covering all our favorite new and updated user scripts since 1 August 2024. At press time, over 94% of the world has legally fallen prey to the merry celebrations of "Christmas", and so shall you soon. It's been a quiet 4 months, and we hope to see you with way more new scripts next year. Happy holidays! ] (]) 05:06, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

] <small>Got anything good? Tell us about your new, improved, old, or messed-up script ]!</small>

{{columns-start|num=3}}
===] Featured script===
:Very useful for changelist patrollers, ''']''', by ''']''', is this edition's featured script. Taking inspiration from ]'s double-click-to-undo feature, it adds an undo button to every line of every diff from "show changes", optimizing partial reverts with your favorite magic spell and nearly fulfilling ].

===] Miscellaneous===
* ], a recent ]/]-like userscript that follows modern WMF UI design, is now ]. However, its sole maintainer has left the project, which still awaits WMF ] (among some audits) to be installed on your favorite WMF wikis.
* ], our former chief editor, has ascended to ] and the <s>greener</s><!--Yes, the usage of the <s> element to denote "things that are no longer relevant or no longer accurate" here is intentional.--> <ins>purpley</ins> pastures of ] with commits creating ] and the <syntaxhighlight inline lang="wikitext">__EXPECTUNUSEDTEMPLATE__</syntaxhighlight> magic word to exclude a template from ]! I wonder if Misplaced Pages has a templaters' newsletter...

{{column}}
]
]
{{column}}

===] Improve a script===
* Many of our favorite scripts such as ], ], and ] haven't been updated for Vector 2022. You could be the one to change that!
* ] and ] work, yet have alien ]. Someone could improve them...
* ] needs updating to order list of pages handle lists of pages to move correctly regardless of the discussion's page, so that we may avoid repeating .

===] Requested scripts===
We need scripts that...
* allow you to edit {{tl|sfn}} references graphically a la ]
* copy specific named references from other pages to help with splitting and whatnot
* make adding icons/links to the top toolbar (or other portlets) much easier
* graphically generate a {{tl|source assess table}}
* award a ]
* ...and many more, all available at ]. Thanks to the editors at US/R—including ], ], ], and many more!—for their work in processing userscript requests this past year.

{{columns-end}}

===] Updated scripts===
* ] forks ] to add support for binary search, automatic edit summaries after generating the {{tl|unsigned}} template, support for {{tl|undated}}, and support for generating while syntax highlighting is on.
* Pour one out: ] forks ] to allow configuration precise to a number of days (from the original precision of years).
* ] forks ] to automatically add CopyPatrol reports.
* ] updates BilledMammal's classic Move+ to add automattic watchlisting of all pages—except the target page(s)—changed while processing a move.

===] Newly maintained scripts===
* Administrators only! ] forks the now-broken ] to review unblock requests with a graphical interface.

===] New scripts===
<!--The current convention is to use the ] notation for scripts added by someone other than the script author and ]: ] for scripts the author adds themselves. Of course, you are always free to ignore all rules.-->
* ]: ] provides a shortcut to its namesake tool, ], which helps de-] articles.
* ]]: ] (''pictured'') generates links to a limited range of ], log items, or page history. You see, it's not just ]!
* ] is a rewrite of ] that makes everything saner to configure.
* When viewing ], ] adds links to automatically insert coordinates into the article selected.
* To satiate archaeology and curiosity (the same thing, perhaps?), ] logs the time it takes for a user to review each submission to ].
* ] adds a searchable list of all Unicode characters to the 2010 source editor.
----
{{center|{{flatlist|
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
}}}}
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Queen of Hearts@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Scripts%2B%2B/Subscribe&oldid=1265112842 -->

Latest revision as of 05:06, 25 December 2024

    There is no Cabal

    Top

    Note. If you want a pageviews link in the tools menu see here. For a pageviews link below all article and talk page titles turn on Xtools at the bottom of the appearance section of these gadget preferences.
    Skip to table of contents
    Misplaced Pages:Babel
    enThis user is a native speaker of the English language.
    fr-2Cet utilisateur peut contribuer avec un niveau intermédiaire en français.
    Search user languages
    Please leave a new message.
    This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics: He should not be given alerts for those areas.
    Subpage Index. Prefix is User talk:

    The Signpost
    24 December 2024

    Just another guy with a PC. See my Commons user page: commons:User:Timeshifter.
    The Signpost, Tech News, The Bugle, and Centralized discussion are transcluded on this page: User:Timeshifter/Newsletters.

    User talk here is not archived. Old talk is deleted. Users are allowed to remove anything from their talk pages. See WP:TALK and other wikipedia guidelines/policies. Like Misplaced Pages articles over time, people change, and there is little point in referring to past stale arguments and discussions.

    To keep the discussion in one thread some comments added here are moved to the user talk page of the author. I reply there. I also watchlist that talk page for awhile in order to note when the user there replies. Harassing comments are also sometimes moved off this talk page. Sometimes the original author is offended by their own harassing comments, and my reply, on their user talk page. They then remove both from their talk page. I guess the light from their own verbal reflection offends them. One can find removed comments by using the history link on a talk page. Inappropriately-applied warning templates, etc.. are also removed from this talk page. Sometimes I remove stuff from my talk page for no particular reason, or for many varied reasons. Removal of comments from my talk page implies nothing. Don't take it personally. Unless I have requested otherwise, feel free to leave new messages on my talk page.





    Once again, help!!

    I had an image from Flickr from a photographer I just dealt with. He made the mistake of changing his copyright license to a Creative Commons one--but not one we accept. I took his word for it that he removed copyright in favor of Creative Commons, but since I'd just uploaded two of his photos with a correct one we accept, it was my oversight that he made a mistake and I didn't check it. The result of this was that the photo was not accepted in Commons for upload. Fine. But now I can't get the damned thing to upload it now that the license is correct! How RUDE. I've been uploading photos for years- more than any other editor I know of on the en.wikipedia. It is for this photo: . How can I fix this? --Leahtwosaints (talk) 14:38, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

    You have GOT to be the coolest Wikisloth with super-powers that I ever met!! For a Sloth, you sure move at a quick pace!! :) Do you wear a "super cape", I wonder? That would really complete the whole outfit and mystique.. I keep trying to think of things I could maybe do for you since you are such a blessing and a help... Hmmm. Did you ever contact Roger Ebert before his untimely demise? Is there perhaps a photo of someone that I can search for on your behalf? Just say the words. I feel a great debt to you for your help over these years. --Leahtwosaints (talk) 12:00, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

    Boyd Bushman Entry Deleted

    Could you believe the dark hearts won in deleting this entry? And now an article I started is also up for deletion by some nobody called LuckyLouie. --HafizHanif (talk) 21:24, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

    Timeshifter, would you be able to give your honest opinion regarding the deletion of Boyd's page? I think my suggestions at the discussion are fair and at least his memory as a scientist should be in wiki, regardless of the mention of any alien stuff. --HafizHanif (talk) 20:19, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

    Not sure if you or someone else is working on reintroducing this entry. I'm also not sure if you've come across this list of patents referencing Bushman's 1996 patent #5542247.

    The sixth listed patent has two U.S. Airforce contracts; F49620-98-C-0038 and F49620-00-C-0005 with many independent source citations.

    It is interesting how other deleted pages usually have a trail of information, but Boyd's has nothing. I didn't get to read what the final verdict was ( other than obvious deletion ). --HafizHanif (talk) 21:38, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

    Van Morrison song

    I might have been buzzing through the disambig. page for the Van Morrison/Robbie Robertson song, "Caravan", seen here: Caravan (Van Morrison song) which they played during the filmed final concert "The Last Waltz" - if it's just my need for glasses please forgive me. Hopefully I'll have a computer soon. --Leahtwosaints (talk) 11:10, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

    New discussion system

    What you saw was Flow.

    • The WMF has been eliminating most of their talk pages (user pages and some major mainspace pages), so you're forced to use Flow if you want to contact them to discuss problems with their projects. A particular problem is that they switched over all official contacts points related to Flow itself! That is particular problem for discussing Flow bugs. (Writing about the bug *in* Flow triggers the problem!)
    • You've only seen the tip of the iceberg. The list of problems with Flow is 142 feet long. Copy-paste is broken. A simple revert destroyed my original comment. Problems with templates. History is a disaster. The reply-threading turns modest-size discussions into unreadable spaghetti. You can't delete your own comments, much less someone else's. (You "hide" it, which leaves a link for it on the board.) IMO the biggest issue is that Flow does not store an accurate stable copy of what you write! Flow can randomly rewrite your formatting codes and nowikis etc. The way Flow works is kind of like translating your text into Russian, then translating it from Russian back to English when someone views or edits it. Sometimes those bugs can mangle your entire post into garbage during the rewrite. In fact Flow preforms that round-trip translation every time you try to preview what you wrote. So you preview, return to editing your wikitext, and Flow has REWRITTEN your wikitext! It's like editing on quicksand. There's no "truetext", everything Flow shows you is an illusion created on the fly.
    • It seems the WMF still wants to eventually get Flow deployed, but the good news is that they've realized that there are serious objections here. They have been *trying* to improve their relations with the community ever since the superprotect incident, with limited success. Putting Flow on hold has been one of the successes. The current official policy is that no Flow pages will be deployed without local consensus requesting it. I think they are hoping the tiny wikis start accepting it, and that eventually all the 'obstructionist-change-averse editors' get dragged along into the wonderful future. BTW there's a doc page where "Admins" and the most "Experienced" editors are defined as the change-averse groups. Lols.
    • There used to be 7 Flow pages on EnWiki. Activity has dropped to zero on every board where Flow gets deployed. One board was the Flow testing board: it died and was never fixed after an admin tried testing admin tools on it. I had a pair of abandoned boards deleted at MFD. I have another abandoned board at MFD with unanimous deletes so far. I have an open RFC at a dead wikiproject to roll back Flow - I *think* its passing but running an RFC inside Flow is a disaster. We can't move the discussion posts down to a separate discussion area, it's almost impossible to tell who is replying to who, and it is difficult to figure out which posts are !votes. Anyway, assuming it passes, that will leave us with two dead Flow pages. It's possible that EnWiki will be Flow-free in a month or two. I need to contact some of the other language Wikis with Flow to see if they want to move forward with Flow or start rolling it back. Alsee (talk) 17:28, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
    @Alsee: Thanks for all the info on Flow! I had to look up MFD. I see that it is Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion. Are there any wikis using LiquidThreads still? The WMF or the devs or whoever is in charge (I have no clue), take simple requests for improvement (such as watchlisting sections of talk pages) and then go crazy with complete rewrites of all the code. Same for the request for a WYSIWYG editor. I just wanted a simple WYSIWYG editor that did the simple stuff, and did it in article sections. But they went crazy and created this monster VE that edits the whole page, and tries to do everything the wikitext editor does and more. I just want VE lite for section editing. Bold, italic, links. --Timeshifter (talk) 13:01, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

    Invitation to chat about interactive maps

    Hello, I’m Chris, a community liaison in the Discovery department at the Wikimedia Foundation. One of the projects we’re working on is to bring interactive maps to Misplaced Pages. If you are interested, I’d like to have an informal conversation with you about your work with WikiProject Maps, and the conventions you all have created. I'd like to learn more about your work and how that might influence the design of interactive maps.

    Please let me know of some good times to chat via email and I can setup a meeting for us. I can be reached at ckoerner@wikimedia.org.

    If you’re not interested, that’s fine. I would appreciate any direction to other editors that have been involved and might be interested.

    Have a good day, CKoerner (WMF) (talk) 20:46, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

    Need your help with this missing Wikipedian-

    Hi, I don't know if there is a procedure to let people know when an editor quits to place a semi-retired placard on their talk page. In the case of Catfish Jim, one of my closest editing friends from the past, his talk page is looking like he's here, when it's just Admin and other bots that deposit info on timed intervals. To my knowledge, he hasn't been working since before I went into a coma three years ago. I think it's March 2012: . I'll leave this to you as an Admin. I'm only doing little edits and am still not healed so, if you don't do something with this, I hope you'll pass it to someone who will. Thanks. --Leahtwosaints (talk) 13:09, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

    "420" collaboration

    As a member of WikiProject Cannabis, you are invited to help organize the project's upcoming "420" collaboration, which is scheduled for April 2017. Yes, we're a few months away, but we're hoping to get the ball rolling by getting buy-in from experienced Misplaced Pages editors and seek help fleshing out some goals and ideas for a successful campaign. We also plan to conduct both on-wiki and offlline outreach so non-Wikipedias can also contribute. If you are interested in participating, please sign up and contribute to the ongoing discussions. All editors are welcome! ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:55, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

    Wishlist Survey & cross-wiki watchlist

    Hi Timeshifter, You said that you might not see my reply on Meta, so I'll talk to you here. :) I'm on the Community Tech team, and we're still working on the cross-wiki watchlist. As you saw, the cross-wiki watchlist was one of the top requests on the 2015 Community Wishlist Survey, and our team is responsible for working on it. It's still an active project for us. It's held up right now by some changes that we need to make to the database, altering the really huge and scary revision tables. We have to wait for permission and help from the database administrator to make those changes. That's a delay, which is a pain, but once we get that done, we'll keep making progress on the cross-wiki watchlist.

    There's another five top wishes from last year's wishlist that we shipped last year, and we're currently working on a few top requests from this year's wishlist -- rewriting Xtools, and warning people after there have been unsuccessful login attempts. I'd be happy to tell you more about our team or the Community Wishlist, if you're interested. Let me know. -- DannyH (WMF) (talk) 23:42, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

    Old editing toolbar (2006 version)

    Hey, Timeshifter, I noticed your thread at VPT. The old toolbar that you posted a screenshot of:

    ...is the 2006 editing toolbar, and within the last week or so, it was retired by the WMF. I'm working on reintroducing it as a user-made script, if you want it back; if you want it, you can install it by adding the line (without <code></code> tags):

    mw.loader.load("/search/?title=User:Writ_Keeper/Scripts/legacyToolbar.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript");

    ...to your common.js page. I'm hoping to get it introduced as an official gadget soon, but in the meantime, that should restore most of the functionality you're used to, I think. HTH, Writ Keeper  18:10, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

    Double ping

    An edit summary mention produces a separate ping so I got two pings for . PrimeHunter (talk) 08:48, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

    Oops, sorry. :) -- Timeshifter (talk) 09:22, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

    Student revision help

    Hi! I am a student editing the page Incarceration of Women in the United States. I saw that you are a main contributor to the Incarceration in the United States article, so I was wondering if you might look over my article and give me any suggestions on what more I could work on? I have mostly focused my attention on the healthcare section, but I'm hoping to submit the entire thing for good article status, so I'd appreciate any feedback you have. Please feel free to post on my talk page! Thanks, Nicolekoonce (talk) 19:19, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

    question re your ideas on editors and various items

    hi. I just happened upon one of your own userboxes. i would like to try to help out. particularly with issues of editor responses, admin conduct. could you please let me know where I can help out? if you reply here, please ping me. thanks!! --Sm8900 (talk) 16:07, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

    Updating Template:COVID-19 pandemic death rates

    I have created Template:COVID-19 pandemic death rates/doc with instructions for updating Template:COVID-19 pandemic death rates. Please advise if you notice any errors.

    I have included the VBA code of a Word macro to automate the later stages of the update. This should work just as well for Template:COVID-19 pandemic death rates by country. I tried to create a macro to automate the whole process, but either the program or my computer does not like large macros. Dudley Miles (talk) 13:33, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

    Dudley Miles. Thanks. Looks good. I adjusted and clarified a few things. Check history for explanations. I don't have MS Word. So I can't help there. I use freeware LibreOffice. Of that free office suite I only use Calc. And I am a beginner with it. --Timeshifter (talk) 17:02, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
    Thanks for your help. The explanation in the doc is much clearer after your changes. Dudley Miles (talk) 17:06, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

    Separate but related questions

    First I noticed that you undid the revision at Template:COVID-19 pandemic death rates by country/styles.css however it doesn't seem you have implemented the changes from User:Timeshifter/Sandbox119 there yet so the table is now no longer scrolling with sticky headers. Are you still planning to re-add those features? If yes is there a reason you're waiting to implement them?

    Secondly, are you looking to create a table stylesheet that can be used to implement any of these features more generally, it seems to me this might be a good idea going forward if you are aware of any feature requests that have or are likely to recur.

    Apologies if this has been asked and answered elsewhere I don't really have time to read through any of those discussions in full at the moment; thanks for your help. (please ping on reply)

    𝒬𝔔 00:12, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

    Update: OK I just noticed the link to Template:COVID-19 pandemic death rates on the help talk page; I presume then that this supersedes Template:COVID-19 pandemic death rates by country? If so it should probably be redirected to the new table. Second question still stands; although as I mentioned earlier it will have to be a bit before I can start on it, thanks. (please ping on reply)

    𝒬𝔔 00:44, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

    Quantocius_Quantotius. This has been moving very fast. There are now 3 table templates and 2 style sheets.
    2 of the table templates are tables that are on this article page:
    Those 2 tables use the same style sheet:
    The CSS style sheet you were working on is this one:
    It is now only used for this table template:
    That table template is in this article:
    That table is not supposed to be a scrollable table.
    I just updated some of the history here:
    User:Timeshifter/Sandbox119
    --Timeshifter (talk) 01:10, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
    Thanks for clearing that up. Well if things are moving fast I probably won't be much help. I may drop in briefly every now and then for the next 2-3 weeks but substantive projects will have to wait until towards the end of the month at least. So I'm about to log-out in a few minutes but if you hit me with a ping I'll see it sooner or later.𝒬𝔔 01:11, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
    Quantocius_Quantotius. I am assuming that the non-scrollable table template does not need the changes you made to it. Since those changes assumed it was a scrollable table. So I will revert your changes. Feel free to add back whatever you think is useful for a non-scrollable table. I haven't been working on that article and its template. Feel free to edit its CSS style sheet now that you know it is for a non-scrollable table.
    I have been concentrating on the scrollable tables. Feel free to work on the CSS for those scrollable tables. I am a newb at CSS. I wish there was a collapse button to collapse the scrollable tables back to scrollbox size after they have been fully expanded by the "show all" button. --Timeshifter (talk) 01:27, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
    Belatedly  Done please see Template:COVID-19 pandemic data. Let me know if there are any issues or if there are any other templates you would like this feature added to.Sorry for the delay, had a lot more IRL stuff to attend to than I anticipated. If I do get a bit of extra time I was planning on setting up a workspace on testWP so we can try to work on some additional css features of general applicability, but I do ask for your patience. I'm already a bit overcommitted to stuff here considering the volunteer time I have available.𝒬𝔔 16:16, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

    (unindent). Thanks Quantocius Quantotius! There is a problem though. The collapse button only works on the template page. I just noticed this concerning "Show all" too. It works fine on the template pages. But when the 3 templates are together on COVID-19 pandemic by country and territory the buttons only work on the top template. So I guess the classes below are not specific enough. I copied the wikitext below from your recent addition to Template:COVID-19 pandemic data.

    <div class="covid-show-table" style="font-size:80%;font-weight:500;">]]</div><div class="covid-collapse-table" style="font-size:80%;font-weight:500;float: right;">]]</div>

    I added the collapse part of the above wikitext to:

    It works great on the template pages. But in the article with the 3 templates clicking any of the "show all" buttons in any table other than the top one does nothing. So the collapse buttons do not show up on the lower tables. Since they don't expand.

    I created a sandbox just for you where you can experiment:

    --Timeshifter (talk) 23:31, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

    I asked for help here:
    Misplaced Pages talk:TemplateStyles
    In the section currently titled: "Need help with multiple templated tables on the same page using the same styles.css"
    --Timeshifter (talk) 06:58, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
    Just noting for the benefit of page watchers that I have given a more detailed explanation over at VPT.𝒬𝔔 23:03, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

    Note: See further discussion here: Template talk:Monthly cumulative COVID-19 death totals by country.

    Userboxes changes

    Hey, sorry you didn't like the changes to your user boxes. I was confronted with some particularly anally retentive editors when I first started editing, and they advised me that the rules and guidelines applied to all of Misplaced Pages, not just the articles. So, I guess that is what gave me the impression I should make the changes, but I'm just as happy to leave them the way you had them since you didn't like the changes because I'm not currently retaining my anus. LOL.😀 Huggums537 (talk) 02:22, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

    Global watchlist - Update 9

    Updates associated with DannyS712's Global watchlist script and the Global watchlist extension:

    Hi everyone. As I noted in the last issue, I received a grant last year from the WMF to develop the global watchlist script into an extension. That extension has now been deployed on Meta. Visit m:Special:GlobalWatchlistSettings to get started.

    That grant has ended, and I have requested another grant to continue development of the extension, and figured subscribers of the newsletter about the user script might be interested. You can see and comment on the grant request at m:Grants:Project/DannyS712/Continued work on GlobalWatchlist extension - if you support this, I hope you'll consider endorsing the request.

    Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 00:28, 19 April 2021 (UTC)


    Global watchlist user script: AboutUpdatesCode
    Global watchlist extension: documentation

    Wikitext is not ...

    The use of HTML in wikitext is in fact HTML.

    1. Please stop edit warring over this. This is non-negotiable.
    2. John is in the right on this point. You must provide compliant HTML for WP:Accessibility.

    Thanks. --Izno (talk) 20:09, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

    Izno. I believe you are mistaken. Mediawiki software converts everything it sees into what it puts on the page. The browser sees none of what is in the wikitext until Mediawiki converts it to HTML, CSS, JavaScript, etc..
    <ul> in the wikitext in the case of side-by-side tables and/or images contributes nothing to accessibility.
    Side-by-side tables and/or images look exactly the same with or without <ul> in the wikitext.
    We can take this to Misplaced Pages:Village pump (technical) if necessary for more info.
    Screenreaders do not see wikitext. They only see what the Mediawiki software converts it too.
    And side-by-side tables and/or images look exactly the same to the browser and screenreaders with or without <ul> in the wikitext.
    Your solution of using a gallery for images is fine too. --Timeshifter (talk) 20:39, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
    I am not mistaken. HTML text in wikitext passes straight through the parser as HTML (both Parser.php and Parsoid) in all cases (with some HTML causing additional changes to how the parser deals with the contained text; <pre> is a notable example). That is why we have an allowed list of HTML and CSS directly in the parser as part of Sanitizer.php: we do not want bad-faith actors to use HTML elements in malevolent ways.
    Subsequently, to provide valid HTML per the HTML standard, <li> must be placed inside either <ol> or <ul>, whether in an actual HTML document or a MediaWiki wikitext document. Perhaps you did not understand the point that John was making.
    (N.b. I am not speaking to wikitext as wikitext just to be clear e.g. * at the beginning of a line.)
    Invalid HTML is usually, almost always, inaccessible HTML. Izno (talk) 20:51, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
    If I may butt in: if y'all are talking about this edit vs. this one, then I can definitely see a difference, in both the HTML output and the rendered output of the page. Timeshifter's edit is missing the surrounding <ul></ul> in the browser HTML, and in the rendered output (at least in my browser), the images are placed closer to the left margin. So it seems that John and Izno are correct. Writ Keeper  21:04, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
    Writ Keeper. See my reply to Izno. Also, John like Izno was talking about inaccessibility problems, not the left margin. John and I discussed this elsewhere. And he did not show any inaccessibility problems. He just suspected there might be some. --Timeshifter (talk) 21:25, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
    The edit in question indeed. Izno (talk) 21:33, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
    Izno. As you said everything has to go through the parser, sanitizer, etc.. And in some cases the HTML is not allowed to be used. Some deprecated HTML for example. Some works. Some doesn't.
    In the case of side-by-side tables I am not seeing any inaccessibility problem. See:
    User:Timeshifter/Sandbox153
    In this case <ul> serves no purpose except to mess up the left margin. Someone complained about this elsewhere. Removing <ul> fixes that problem, and it is more efficient code. Less to remember.
    It allows tables to fit in narrower screens too. Since there is no left margin. Narrow your browser window on the sandbox page to see. The horizontal scrollbar shows up sooner on the lower set of side-by-side tables that have <ul>
    What inaccessibility problem are you seeing? I see none when doing without <ul> in this sandbox case.
    --Timeshifter (talk) 21:19, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
    Yeah, no. Bold text that indicates an argument on how your device provides you content isn't how accessibility works. "I like less code" also isn't how we make decisions where accessibility is relevant. Much less conformant HTML. If you personally cannot remember that list item elements must be inside o/ul elements, then you specifically should not revert an editor correcting that issue; if you want to fix any particular display that you do not like, you need to ask how to do that, not revert. In this case, if you want to "fix" the left margin, the way to fix that is to set margin-left: 0 on the list item elements. Izno (talk) 21:33, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
    Izno. If you google style=display:inline-table you will see it used in many different ways. Many different ways without <ul>. I already knew about margin-left:0
    I also already knew how to fix the problem without it. So I fixed it. You have yet to show me why my fix is incorrect. As in how it is inaccessible. --Timeshifter (talk) 21:44, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
    You are barking up a totally weird tree if you think my concern has anything remotely to do with CSS display. I am strictly concerned about outputting both valid and accessible HTML, for which you must include ol/ul elements.
    Regarding accessibility, it's not about you. It is specifically in regard to screen readers. Izno (talk) 21:50, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
    Izno. In my first reply to you, I mentioned screenreaders. You have yet to show me a problem with accessibility. There are many cases in wikitext that don't use the same full HTML that one would use as a webmaster. Long ago I did my share of basic web pages on Tripod, Angelfire, Geocities, etc.. So I know the difference. --Timeshifter (talk) 22:00, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
    Indeed, What inaccessibility problem are you seeing? is precisely the wrong question when it comes to screen readers. Writ Keeper  21:55, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
    Some people use screenreaders even though they have perfect eyesight. Some developers for example. But I take your point, and I ask everybody: What accessibility problems are you claiming? If you don't have a screenreader how can you claim anything unless someone with a screenreader tells you something? Send them to User:Timeshifter/Sandbox153. Ask them if their screenreader detects any difference other than the left margin. --Timeshifter (talk) 22:06, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
    Okay, first of all, it is not the responsibility of people who need accessibility aids to analyze a page for accessibility issues; it is our responsibility as editors (and as coders) to anticipate and address all such issues proactively. Second of all, look at this: : specifically errors 11 and 12 (further errors suppressed). li tags are invalid HTML when used the way they are. (Granted, there are a ton of other errors, too, but that doesn't mean it's okay for us to throw a bunch more onto the pile; an analogy to WP:OTHERSTUFF comes to mind.) As Izno points out, screen readers parse the HTML structure of a page to present it to their users, and any invalid HTML can cause problems for screen readers; thus, it is incumbent on us as editors to avoid invalid HTML wherever possible, because being proactive about avoiding accessibility issues is our responsibility as editors. We should not wait until a person who depends on a screen reader to complain; if they complain, we have already failed. I don't think "I like the margin padding better" is reasonable as an excuse to use invalid HTML, especially when the same effect can be accomplished with valid HTML, and "I think the HTML looks better" is certainly not a reasonable excuse. Do better. Writ Keeper  22:30, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
    I think you are making my case. There are 597 errors on that page. And additional warnings. HTML always has this problem. That is why we have transitional HTML versions, and so on. There will never be perfection.
    Until we get someone with a screenreader to check out the sandbox (User:Timeshifter/Sandbox153), we are talking in circles. Mediawiki would be paralyzed if it held up everything until every single change in the mediawiki code was run by someone with a screenreader. And I have heard from someone with a screenreader who pointed out that a Mediawiki problem he experienced was annoying, but that the alternative was worse because it only helped him, but made things seriously worse for far more people. So everything is a balance. I find it annoying that you, John, and Izno are all going on strictly your suspicions, but without any evidence of a problem. I don't think there will be a problem. Screenreaders have no problem with basic tables with a single row of headers. As long as they have captions. That is what we have at User:Timeshifter/Sandbox153. See if you can round up someone with a screenreader. I will too. --Timeshifter (talk) 23:00, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
    Okay, so this conversation is indeed going around in circles, but I think it's for different reasons than the ones you're thinking. You started out by saying there was no difference in the page between your version and JohnFromPinckney's version: Side-by-side tables and/or images look exactly the same with or without <ul> in the wikitext. That is demonstrably false, though; there is both a visible difference and a difference in the HTML output. When this was pointed out to you, you said In this case <ul> serves no purpose except to mess up the left margin. Someone complained about this elsewhere. Removing <ul> fixes that problem. So, now, you're saying that you see the difference (in the left margin), and are remivng UL tags deliberately to fix that. But you see how that does not correspond with what you said forty minutes earlier and ten lines above, right? You're moving the goalposts. Now, you're demanding that a person who uses a screen reader come in and prove to you that there's an accessibility issue. But it should not take a blind person with a screenreader to tell you that you're messing up the page to convince you to stop inserting invalid HTML into a page. If there are hundreds of HTML problems with a page, we don't fix it by adding ten more. And honestly, the rules of how HTML works should be the baseline for any conversation about HTML in Misplaced Pages, even before we get into any questions about accessibility. The burden of proof is on you to justify why you're breaking the rules of HTML, and "I don't like the margin (which can be fixed with valid HTML)" and "it's nine bytes less code" does not cut it. Writ Keeper  00:42, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

    (unindent). I have been clear all along that other than the left margin, the visible output is the same. Both versions are side by side tables that wrap. Someone else on the Help:Table talk page complained about the left margin. They did not like all the clutter of using <ul style="margin-left:0px;"> to get rid of the left margin. I experimented and noticed that getting rid of <ul> altogether got rid of the left margin. This allowed side by side tables to work in narrower screens with simpler wikitext. It is all on the talk page. You keep thinking that HTML in wikitext has to follow all the rules of HTML elsewhere. According to this w3schools page <p> without </p> is malformed HTML. But Help:HTML in wikitext says: "Note that the closing tag </p> is not strictly necessary for MediaWiki installations that output HTML 5 (such as Misplaced Pages)." There are many other examples of allowed HTML use in wikitext that does not follow the HTML rules elsewhere.--Timeshifter (talk) 02:00, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

    ...Okay, I'm not sure how this isn't clear yet, but none of us are concerned about what the HTML looks like in the wikitext (i.e. in the edit box, when you're editing the page). Of course that doesn't have to be valid HTML, because it hasn't gone through the Mediawiki parser to become true HTML yet. What we're all talking about is the output HTML of the rendered page (i.e. what you see if you view the page like a reader would and right-click to view source). The edits you're making are causing errors in the output HTML, *not* the wikitext. As I explained on VPT, the example you give eith the <p> tag is not a relevant comparison. The reason the page says that the closing p tag is optional is because, when the wikitext containing an unclosed p tag goes through the Mediawiki parser, the parser will automatically close the p tag for you. So, while there is an unclosed p tag in the wikitext, there is no unclosed p tag in the output HTML, because the parser fixes it for you. But the parser does not fix orphaned li tags in the same way, so using li tags without an enclosing ul tag will lead to invalid HTML in the output HTML, not just the wikitext. You can see this in action here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/api.php?action=parse&page=User:Writ_Keeper/sandbox . Notice how, although there is an unclosed p tag in the wikitext, the p tag is properly closed, and thus valid HTML, in the HTML code that the parser outputs. They're not the same thing. Writ Keeper  02:20, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
    There is lots of other stuff that ends up in the output HTML that is not perfect HTML. Deprecated HTML, etc.. Others in the VPT thread have pointed out various examples. As I have said several times, if it doesn't effect anything then it doesn't matter. You have yet to show that this lack of <ul> here effects anything in a negative way. --Timeshifter (talk) 02:30, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
    Both JAWS and NVDA detect the version with ul as containing HTML lists but do not detect the HTML lists in the version without ul. Please do not use the latter version. Also, screen readers don't normally detect margins. Graham87 02:42, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
    Thanks Graham. I am confused though since technically there are no lists at all in either section. There are just 2 side by side tables in each of the 2 sections.
    But no problem. We no longer need that method that uses the list HTML of li and ul.
    isaacl found a simpler solution that only uses divs. It is elegant, legal, and simpler. I pasted it in as a third section on that sandbox page:
    User:Timeshifter/Sandbox153
    --Timeshifter (talk) 02:56, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
    Sounds good re divs. Technically there are lists in the section that contains ul ... that is exactly what the ul tag does; it creates an unordered list. Whether it's *semantically* appropriate is another thing entirely ... but a list should be marked up properly in any case. Graham87 03:02, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

    (unindent). Graham. So your screen readers read the divs option OK at sandbox 153? Or below? I pasted it below so that others reading this thread can check it out too.

    Total number of matches played in official competitions only.
    Player Matches Goals
    Guðmundur Hrafnkelsson 407 0
    Guðjón Valur Sigurðsson 364 1,875
    Total number of goals scored in official matches only.
    Player Goals Matches Average
    Guðjón Valur Sigurðsson 1,875 364 5.15
    Ólafur Stefánsson 1,570 330 4.76

    Everybody: Narrow your browser screen to see the tables wrap (one drop below the other). Works in mobile view too. --Timeshifter (talk) 03:19, 16 June 2021 (UTC) --Timeshifter (talk) 03:19, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

    Yes, it works fine. Graham87 03:33, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

    New link for the table section

    Hi! Sorry if I'm bothering you. I am new to Misplaced Pages and wanted to contribute to the site. I noticed that the external links at the bottom of the table help page contains webpages that allows you to make tables only from inputting data directly into the website. I was wondering if it was Ok for me to add a link to a webpage that makes tables that allows user to upload excel files and convert it to the wiki format and vice versa. Thanks! --Rangusangus (talk) 17:12, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

    Rangusangus. What is the link? I will have a look at it. It might also be posted here:
    --Timeshifter (talk) 21:33, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

    @Timeshifter: Sorry to keep you waiting! I found the website here: http://www.excel2wiki.com/ Looks like it was originally excel2wiki.net but was changed to the current one Rangusangus (talk) 03:15, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

    Rangusangus. See: Help:Table#Converting spreadsheets and database tables to wikitable format
    It links to the:
    Copy & Paste Excel-to-Wiki converter.
    --Timeshifter (talk) 06:09, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

    @Timeshifter: The Copy & Paste Excel-to-Wiki converter. and the other one at Help:Table#Converting spreadsheets and database tables to wikitable format are different as they only supports ctrl + c/v to paste the table and the the other (www.excel2wiki.com) supports uploading excel files directly on the website. --Rangusangus (talk) 08:57, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

    Rangusangus. Have you used this converter? Does it work?
    Also, I noticed that the page loads very slowly. And it doesn't scroll vertically. My taskbar covers up the last line of the page:
    "For any problems, contact me at nguye586@purdue.edu"
    I can only see it if I lower my font size.
    --Timeshifter (talk) 18:41, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

    @Timeshifter: I have used this converter before and can confirm that it works. Personally, I find it more convenient than the other converters, especially for larger tables as it requires a file upload than copy pasting. It also has options for single quote and double quote tables.

    I managed to contact them and they said the scroll button should be fixed now.
    For the loading problems, I don't have a problem on my end so it might be a geographical issue where the webpage is hosted.
    --Rangusangus (talk) 14:13, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
    It takes forever to load. Now it is cut off at the top.
    I looked at the HTML page source.
    I suggest you contact them, and tell them that maybe they should remove the style sheet and class="centered". Also remove the script at the bottom.
    Then it will be a normal plain web page that fits to the screen.--Timeshifter (talk) 18:15, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

    @Timeshifter: Can you take a look at the website now? They said the problem should have been fixed. Loading times are still normal for me. --Rangusangus (talk) 04:43, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

    It no longer is messed up. But it takes 20 seconds to load. Please ask them to remove as much external styling and scripting as possible. Try using inline styling instead. It is just a simple web page, and shouldn't take 20 seconds to load. --Timeshifter (talk) 05:46, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

    @Timeshifter: They said there were a minimal amount of external styling and scripting and there was nothing too fancy.

    I tried to test the website on 2 speed checking website and the average load time was 0.5 seconds. https://imgur.com/a/ilrc8Ub
    Can you try to access the website using this link instead? https://www.excel2wiki.com/
    If the issue still persists, could you check the speed of the website using online speed checker tools to see if its a website issue or a local issue.
    On my end the website is working fine. I will forward an email to them again if its still not working on your end.

    --Rangusangus (talk) 09:39, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

    Rangusangus. It is the same 20 seconds in Firefox. Edge is fast. Half a second.
    This is out of my league. Maybe ask for help at toolforge.com
    That is the domain for this other excel2wiki tool:
    https://excel2wiki.toolforge.org
    toolforge.com redirects to here:
    https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/Portal:Toolforge
    Maybe host the tool there. Or get some help from there.
    --Timeshifter (talk) 11:49, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

    Misplaced Pages Wars and the Israel-Palestine conflict...please fill out my survey?

    Hello :) I am writing my MA dissertation on Misplaced Pages Wars and the Israel-Palestine conflict, and I noticed that you have contributed to those pages. My dissertation will look at the process of collaborative knowledge production on the Israel-Palestine conflict, and the effect it has on bias in the articles. This will involve understanding the profiles and motivations of editors, contention/controversy and dispute resolution in the talk pages, and bias in the final article.

    For more information, you can check out my meta-wiki research page or my user page, where I will be posting my findings when I am done.

    I would greatly appreciate if you could take 5 minutes to fill out this quick survey before 8 August 2021.

    Participation in this survey is entirely voluntary and anonymous. There are no foreseeable risks nor benefits to you associated with this project.

    Thanks so much,

    Sarah Sanbar

    Sarabnas Questions? 11:01, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

    Article help

    Howdy Timeshifter,

    I really appreciate the hard work you've out in to US drug overdose death rates and totals over time. It's a great article. One thing I would like to comment about: some passages are a bit informal.

    For example: "Around 100,300 died in the 12 month period ending April 30, 2021. That's 275 a day."

    Would you agree that this declarative "That's 275 a day" seems a bit informal? Would it bother you if I changed the lead to something like "Around 100,300 people died in the 12 month period ending April 30, 2021, at a rate of 275 deaths per day."? I don't want to ask you to do anything because I know you're such a busy contributor.

    Regardless, Happy New Year! -- Hunan201p (talk) 22:30, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

    Hunan201p. Thanks. Either way sounds fine by me. Feel free to change it. Let's keep further article related discussion on the article talk page. --Timeshifter (talk) 00:20, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

    A barnstar for your efforts

    COVID-19 Barnstar
    Awarded for efforts in expanding and verifying articles related to COVID-19. Awarded by Cdjp1 (talk) 8 March 2022 (UTC)
    The Original Barnstar
    Awarded for being the top contributor to an article related to COVID-19. Awarded by Cdjp1 (talk) 8 March 2022 (UTC)
    Cdjp1. Thanks for the barnstars! --Timeshifter (talk) 03:43, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

    Happy Seventeenth First Edit Day!

    Hey, Timeshifter. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Misplaced Pages Birthday Committee!
    Have a great day! Chris Troutman (talk) 18:46, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

    Timeshifter hi. Question.

    I am hoping I am doing this correctly. I saw your comments on Raw Story and agree with them.I am sorry but I do not have an account and hope this is the correct place to respond. I will also answer you on the other page.

    Can you PLEASE --- whenever you have time take a look at Palmer Report? There has been a Misplaced Pages attack from some republican editors. They are a political site -- a good one and I am a fan.

    For months (years) scores of people have been pleading with the editors there to take the "hyper partisan, fake news website" out of the header. It is not accurate. It was put there by the same person who muddied up Raw story -- a republican. I along with dozens -- literally dozens of people protested. We felt it was an attack, a vicious one. The response was always send some reliable sources to counter it.

    Only nobody ever used the term "hyper-partisan, fake news website" in the first place. I spent four hours trying to find a source and asked several times. There are some obscure republican sources. They never used, to the best of my knowledge any of those terms.

    They also locked the page when people tried to change it and called it vandalism. But everyone I saw came in good faith. The Palmer Report is not fake news and is very much like Raw Story. I had a source -- Brian Williams from MSNBC did a segment several tears ago and used information from their site. I was told that was not interesting enough to put on the site and then they ignored me and all the others. You an easily see this through old Talk pages because there are over a dozen complaints.

    I hope you are not upset that I posted such a long post but I think what is happening makes Wiki look very bad and I liked what you said on the raw story site. I do not want to name the person less it be thought of as a verbal attack but you can see all this quite easily. Please if you can do anything, please research this and please look seriously at the "hyperpartisan, fake news" entry. Because that is not neutral.

    Thank you,

          1. Norah

    2600:6C65:7E7F:B93E:AD3C:1976:2DA8:EAB2 (talk) 00:33, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

    Hi Norah. I don't have the time, health, and energy nowadays for much Misplaced Pages activity. You will get a lot farther if you log in with a user name. You are still anonymous. You can create an account with just a user name and password. Email address is optional, and is not public. Useful for password resets. It can be a secondary throwaway email address. Gmail can be set to forward to another email address. Even another Gmail address. --Timeshifter (talk) 00:59, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
    Thank you. I am sorry about your health issues. I will not bore you with a long reply but I have tried in the past as have others and nothing worked. Was delighted to see how several of you fixed Raw Story who I also like. But I am completely unaware of how to edit on Wiki and also have some (minor) health issues. But thanks! At least you care and that counts for a lot. I hope your health situation improves and thank you so much for answering.
    #### Norah 2600:6C65:7E7F:B93E:AD3C:1976:2DA8:EAB2 (talk) 04:16, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

    Editing news 2023 #1

    Read this in another languageSubscription list for this newsletter

    This newsletter includes two key updates about the Editing team's work:

    1. The Editing team will finish adding new features to the Talk pages project and deploy it.
    2. They are beginning a new project, Edit check.

    Talk pages project

    Screenshot showing the talk page design changes that are currently available as beta features at all Wikimedia wikis. These features include information about the number of people and comments within each discussion.
    Some of the upcoming changes

    The Editing team is nearly finished with this first phase of the Talk pages project. Nearly all new features are available now in the Beta Feature for Discussion tools.

    It will show information about how active a discussion is, such as the date of the most recent comment. There will soon be a new "Add topic" button. You will be able to turn them off at Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion. Please tell them what you think.

    Daily edit completion rate by test group: DiscussionTools (test group) and MobileFrontend overlay (control group)

    An A/B test for Discussion tools on the mobile site has finished. Editors were more successful with Discussion tools. The Editing team is enabling these features for all editors on the mobile site.

    New Project: Edit Check

    The Editing team is beginning a project to help new editors of Misplaced Pages. It will help people identify some problems before they click "Publish changes". The first tool will encourage people to add references when they add new content. Please watch that page for more information. You can join a conference call on 3 March 2023 to learn more.

    Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:19, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

    Global xwiki watchlist

    Hello! Was looking into some of the history of and proposals for a global watchlist, and saw quite a few comments on it by you in the past. Is there a current solution or commonly accepted tooling for this purpose? Thanks! Top5a (talk) 06:49, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

    Top5a. I don't know. I haven't been keeping up with it. --Timeshifter (talk) 08:03, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
    OK! Thank you for the rapid reply! Cheers -- Top5a (talk) 08:05, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

    Some stroopwafels for you!

    I realize we have been butting heads (in good faith!) a bunch recently. But I wanted to stop by and just say I appreciate the work you do maintaining tables across the website, ensuring text-citation integrity, and helping others understand how to maintain the encyclopedia. Thank you, and happy new year! Enjoy this stroopwafel – I saw "stroopwafel" in the WikiLove menu and needed to see what one is. They look delicious, but I can't say I've heard of one before, much less tried one :)

    Best, HouseBlaster 02:56, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

    Thanks! --Timeshifter (talk) 03:10, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

    Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 25

    Hey there, welcome to the 25th issue of the Misplaced Pages Scripts++ Newsletter, covering all our favorite new and updated user scripts since 1 March 2024. We've got a ton of wonderful editors taking back their pitchforks today. Don't worry, for they come in peace, to forcibly fix and extend existing scripts you use with sheer passion. There's so many, them forks have got what's basically their own column now! gift us with some rows before it's too late Aaron Liu (talk) 04:01, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

    Got anything good? Tell us about your new, improved, old, or messed-up script here!

    Featured script

    inline-diff-inline-patrol by Ponor is this edition's featured script. By loading diffs inline on every page that shows a list of changes, it implements the 2023 community wish m:Community Wishlist Survey 2023/Admins and patrollers/Inline diffs and inline patrol. Hopefully we won't need this script anymore soon, with the WMF's focus on the backlog...

    Improve a script

    Requested scripts

    Scripts++ Newsletter
    Scripts++ Newsletter

    Updated scripts

    • After the RIIJ(rewrite it in jQuery) update, Aaron Liu: Watchlyst Greybar Unsin has a dismiss button that allows you to mark an item as read in one click and cycle to the next Watchlist item.
    • Lordseriouspig/StatusChangerImproved is just like Enterprisey's script, except you select your status from a dropdown instead of cycling through them with a button. The WMF operates out of car-centric infrastructure anyway. Shame!

    Newly maintained scripts

    New scripts


    please i beg you , help me with this table

    Greetings, Time Shifter. I hope you are well. I am working on building a table on how the island of Hispaniola ended up being transformed into two states: the Dominican Republic and Haiti with collapsible sections and images of each stage.

    I have tried to make it myself with the little knowledge of codes that I know. I am writing you in the hope that you can help me. I have seen in your profile some beautiful tables with collapsible sections.

    This is what I have done so far.

    please help.

    take care Risantana (talk) 06:23, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

    Risantana. I copied the infobox tables onto my profile page. I did not create them. Try asking for help at Misplaced Pages:Help desk. --Timeshifter (talk) 06:33, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

    Happy First Edit Day!

    Calendar emojiHappy First Edit Day!
    Hi Timeshifter! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:58, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
    Party popper emoji

    Better table

    I edit the table at SM Supermalls, look same as Wiki hosting service. Ask now for help. GAMERBOY102 (talk) 14:14, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

    @GAMERBOY102: I added Template:static-row-numbers. What are you trying to do there? I might be able to help. See also: Help:Table. It also has a search form for table help at the top of the page. --Timeshifter (talk) 18:33, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

    I want to add Template:static-row-numbers for Wiki hosting service

    Help for our tables now! GAMERBOY102 (talk) 00:07, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

    GAMERBOY102. I don't think that is a good idea there. The table is already very wide. Even a narrow column of static row numbers is too much. Columns should be removed, not added. Or the table divided in half. --Timeshifter (talk) 02:28, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

    ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

    Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

    The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

    If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

    WikiProject Human Rights Revival

    Hi! I recently posted at WikiProject Human rights about the lack of activity on the project and its being labeled as "semi-active". I noticed that you are a member of the project, and would like to get your input if possible. See my post on the Talk page, and if you have insight into possibly reviving the project or have any thoughts about it, feel free to comment. Thanks! Spookyaki (talk) 22:33, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

    Administrators' newsletter – December 2024

    News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2024).

    Administrator changes

    added
    readded
    removed

    Interface administrator changes

    added
    readded Pppery

    CheckUser changes

    readded

    Guideline and policy news

    Technical news

    Arbitration


    Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

    Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 26

    Hello everyone, and welcome to the 26th issue of the Misplaced Pages Scripts++ Newsletter, covering all our favorite new and updated user scripts since 1 August 2024. At press time, over 94% of the world has legally fallen prey to the merry celebrations of "Christmas", and so shall you soon. It's been a quiet 4 months, and we hope to see you with way more new scripts next year. Happy holidays! Aaron Liu (talk) 05:06, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

    Got anything good? Tell us about your new, improved, old, or messed-up script here!

    Featured script

    Very useful for changelist patrollers, DiffUndo, by Nardog, is this edition's featured script. Taking inspiration from WP:AutoWikiBrowser's double-click-to-undo feature, it adds an undo button to every line of every diff from "show changes", optimizing partial reverts with your favorite magic spell and nearly fulfilling m:Community Wishlist/Wishes/Partial revert undo.

    Miscellaneous

    Scripts++ Newsletter
    Scripts++ Newsletter

    Improve a script

    Requested scripts

    We need scripts that...

    Updated scripts

    Newly maintained scripts

    New scripts