Misplaced Pages

Talk:International Socialists (Canada): Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:42, 8 January 2005 editDejvid (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,660 edits →Criticism in articles← Previous edit Latest revision as of 15:20, 15 February 2024 edit undoCewbot (talk | contribs)Bots7,280,410 editsm Maintain {{WPBS}}: 3 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 3 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Socialism}}, {{WikiProject Canada}}, {{WikiProject Politics}}.Tag: Talk banner shell conversion 
(30 intermediate revisions by 29 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|1=
This may be the best way to avoid a constant cut and paste war. If changes are made then please keep the NPOV alert for this section.
{{WikiProject Socialism|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Canada|ppap=yes|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Politics|political-parties=y|importance=}}
}}


{{Archive box| ]}}
----
I see no debate here, if you want community comment the least you should do is clearly state your viewpoints on this discussion page and try to discuss things first. --]] 05:14, 2005 Jan 6 (UTC)


== External links modified ==
When you are putting up lies, and backing them up with lies by a bias 'journalist' at NOW magazine, it still is a lie. I have not removed all the criticisms, as you can see, while others keep on putting in comments that are blatently inaccurate, such as saying that SPHR does not have public meetings. No other page, even OCAPs, has so much time committed to different organizations opinions. That is not what an encyclopedia is for.


Hello fellow Wikipedians,
==Response==
Please read the NPOV policy. NPOV does *NOT* mean that no opinions or criticisms can appear. Citing a published source is completely consistent with Misplaced Pages policies. If you don't think criticism appears in articles I suggest you read more Misplaced Pages articles, particularly those on political organizations and topics. Please do not remove things just because they quote individuals or organizations the IS doesn't like.


I have just added archive links to {{plural:1|one external link|1 external links}} on ]. Please take a moment to review . If necessary, add {{tlx|cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{tlx|nobots|deny{{=}}InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
As for Toronto SPHR. You can easily disprove the allegation by saying when the next public membership meeting (as opposed to a public forum) of Toronto SPHR is but members of York SPHR and other groups like Al-Awda have accused Toronto SPHR of being secretive, not having open membership and shutting out people critical of the IS. ] 18:15, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20040808193131/http://www.nowtoronto.com:80/issues/2004-07-08/news_story3.php to http://www.nowtoronto.com/issues/2004-07-08/news_story3.php


When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' to let others know.
== RESPONSE ==


{{sourcecheck|checked=false}}
In order to stop this back and forth I have left the material that I believe inaccurate and malicious but have included the NPOV warning because of the contentious material. Please keep this here in order to avoid the cut and paste battle.


Cheers. —]<small><sub style="margin-left:-14.9ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">]:Online</sub></small> 19:20, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Two points will be made: Firstly, quoting an opinionative article from NOW magazine that is biased and inaccurate is not standard either on Misplaced Pages or other scholarly encylcopedias. In fact the entire criticism section is full of very limited opinion and with a tone that is more appopriate on the pages of Workers Vanguard than an encylopedic website.

Secondly, in reference to SPHR, the passage written refers to public meetings, not public members meetings. In respect to the organizational structure of SPHR Toronto, the organizing committee is made of representatives from the various chapters across Toronto, including U of T, U of T Mississauga, and York. U of T's groups decide on their representatives democratically, and I would hope York does as well. In fact, only one IS member is on the committee (how dominating!) As to certain people being pushed away because they are not "pro-IS" this is baseless. Recently, an individual from York was expelled because of repeated complaints of harrasment by Muslim women and this was a decision initiated not by any IS member, but someone originating from SPHR Montreal.

I have looked at various poltical entries on Misplaced Pages and none spend to much time on sectarian criticisms. This amount of verbiage here is not often paralleled.

== Criticism in articles ==

Take a look at ], ], ], ], ], ] and more. Criticisms are standard in wikipedia and there's no reason why IS Canada should be immune. ] 00:59, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Judging from the way the British SWP behaves, I am sure
that everything in it is quite accurate. But it just reads like
the reporting of a lot of petty feuds.
I did look at the ] page. It didn't seem
to have descended into that kind of pettiness and yet it too
is disputed. ] 00:18, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)

After a little thought I think it was unwise for me to use the word petty. These kind of disputes are very important to those involved but of little interest to anyone else. Hence our sources of information about them will come '''solely''' from those involved. Links to pages hostile to the IS seem more appropriate to me.
] 11:42, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 15:20, 15 February 2024

This article is rated Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconSocialism Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconCanada: Politics Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Political parties and politicians in Canada.
WikiProject iconPolitics: Political parties
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Political parties task force.

Archives

 1


External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on International Socialists (Canada). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —Talk to my owner:Online 19:20, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Categories: