| Revision as of 14:58, 6 December 2006 editEkajati (talk | contribs)2,165 edits Starwood meditation← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 00:35, 24 February 2024 edit undo2603:6081:78f0:75e0:d8bf:ab71:355c:9d9e (talk)No edit summary | ||
| (622 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Not around|is not currently active on Misplaced Pages|date=24 May 2023}} | |||
| <div style="align: center; padding: 1em; border: solid 2px darkblue; background-color: lightcyan;"> | |||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
| <center><big>'''Welcome to my Talk Page!'''</big></center> | |||
| |maxarchivesize = 50K | |||
| Feel free to leave your questions, comments, or anything else below. You can do so by clicking ! Please sign your comments with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>. | |||
| |counter = 12 | |||
| |archive = User talk:Revolving Bugbear/Archive %(counter)d | |||
| |algo = old(3d) | |||
| |minthreads = 1 | |||
| }} | |||
| <div style="position:absolute; z-index:100; right:50px; top:10px;" class="metadata">{{Friendly}}</div> | |||
| There are a few guidelines for my talk page and, while I will never completely delete a comment made on this page, I may move it to another (probably sub-page) if it does not comply with these simple guidelines. | |||
| # This is a safe space. You can say whatever you like on this page without fear of retribution or attack, from me or other users. | |||
| # This is a constructive space. Positive criticisms designed to better the encyclopedia and its environment are welcome, but negative comments designed to belittle a person or point of view are not. | |||
| # This is a free speech space. You can say whatever you like on this page without fear of being censored. | |||
| # This is an open space. Anything may be discussed here. | |||
| {{cross}} '''Just Say No''' to "checkers". | |||
| This guidelines are hierarchised from top to bottom so, for instance, a personal attack against another user will not be covered under the "free speech" guideline and will be moved. | |||
| <div style="align: center; padding: 1em; border: solid 2px darkblue; background-color: lightcyan;"> | |||
| So please, leave a message or anything else here. I will always try to respond to your messages (excepting brief acknowledgements and the like which are simply responses to mine), and I will answer on your talk page, unless the thread on my page contains more than one user. In the case that I respond on your page, I will usually copyover your comment to preserve cohesion. | |||
| <div class="center"><big>'''Welcome to my Talk Page!'''</big></div> | |||
| Feel free to leave your questions, comments, or anything else below. You can do so by clicking ! Please sign your comments with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>. | |||
| This talk page is intended to be a safe, constructive space. Anyone is welcome to share his or her thoughts or opinions here. Personal attacks and incivility are unwelcome here. | |||
| You may also want to read my ]. | |||
| </div><br><br> | |||
| So please, leave a message or anything else here. I will always try to respond to your messages (excepting brief acknowledgments and the like which are simply responses to mine), and I will answer on your talk page, unless the thread on my page contains more than one user. In the case that I respond on your page, I will usually copy over your comment to preserve cohesion. | |||
| ]<br> | |||
| ]<br> | |||
| ] | |||
| Note that this talk page is bilingual. I will be happy to take questions and comments and German, and will respond in German, if you are more comfortable communicating that way. I reserve the right, however, to translate the message for others' convenience. | |||
| </div><br><br> | |||
| {{Archives|collapsed=yes|image=none|search=no}} | |||
| __TOC__ | |||
| I'm currently mediating: | |||
| ]<br> | |||
| ] | |||
| ==RfC== | |||
| I opened an RfC regarding ], it is located at ] and would appreciate you comments if you have any. This message is being posted to anyone's talk page who it seems has had much contact with the user in question. | |||
| I know you interaction has been breif but its also been neutral. --]<s>]</s> 22:06, 10 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Just to give you an update I have little to do with Democratic Underground and the issue with FAAFA that I have takes place mainly outside of that. I had compiled a page following what I felt were bad edits to a noticeboard and have kept it since, this was while he was editing under {{vandal|NBGPWS}}. After he changed his name I kept the list of incidents and it just happens that many of the people coincide with that articles as they seem to know eachother off wiki, or butted heads in the past. That is why it seems odd that I am introducing it. I am not involved in the Democratic Underground debate at all, the issue stems from outside of it, but contains many of the same people. --]<s>]</s> 03:22, 11 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Attention == | |||
| Your attention is requred at ]. ] 20:02, 9 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Thank you! == | |||
| You are far too kind, CheNuevara. Your comments were so nice, thank you for them! -- ]<font color="green">]</font> 23:28, 10 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == RfC == | |||
| Thanks for your unbiased input on the RfC, Che. I'm somewhat unfamiliar with these. Let me ask -- Is it helpful for me to point out the similar violations of my accusers, to illustrate that this was a two-way street? | |||
| Here for instance, is documentation of one editor and tormentor creating a sock puppet, solely to taunt and bait me, and even admitting to it. | |||
| - Thanks - ] 07:02, 12 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination for deletion of Template:Eurohistcollaboration == | |||
| :Actually it was created You were lacking a ] enemies list so I added a user to it.--] 07:27, 12 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> <span style="color:green">'''Ten Pound Hammer'''</span> • <sup>(])</sup> 04:46, 10 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == ArbCom 2017 election voter message == | |||
| Do you intend to deal with the dispute, or just the users slapping at eachoter? ] 17:20, 14 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| {{Ivmbox|Hello, Revolving Bugbear. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| == Hey == | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| : Lol, Che. Nice to know that someone agrees with me occasionally. BTW, why are people so hung up about their edit counts? Get over 500/1000 - it all becomes are bit irrelevant, no? Also BTW, you might like to know that I voted for Kim (Bruning) in the board elections, so no hard memories of the minor scrap at your old RFA, right? Cheers, ] 21:40, 27 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == Help and Advice on Starwood Mediation? == | |||
| |Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2017/Coordination/MMS/08&oldid=813407029 --> | |||
| == ArbCom 2018 election voter message == | |||
| I sort of got a recommendation from ] that you could possibly give some advice on the ]. Mediation seems rather stalled for the moment and we have no mediator in charge. Related to this is ] as well. I'm uncertain whether we should move on to ] or what. Since things seem to be heading to another edit war, I'd really like some input from a more experienced hand at this. We really need a help with this situation. If nothing else, we could use feedback on this situation if you have the time to do so. Also FYI, I'm also mentioning this to ], another recommendation from Addhoc. Thanks. --] (] • ]) 19:57, 3 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| {{Ivmbox|Hello, Revolving Bugbear. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| Hi, Che -- I think the Starwood spamming is clear case of policy violation, therefore not a case for mediation. I think ] about ], and how that is a precedent for no internal links from perfomers/presenters to the festival, are relevant. I don't think this case should have ever gone to mediation. As I seriously doubt anyone who is familiar with WP linkspam policies would support this google bombing attempt, how could a "neutral" mediator who is also familiar with WP policy even be found? In addition to WP policy, I think the consensus on the charges against Matisse show community consensus that it was a clear-cut case of spamming. So, my question is, what's the best way to deal with the spammers at this point? --] ]<font color="navy">♦</font>] 23:33, 3 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| == More on Starwood Mediation == | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
| Thank you for your offer to mediate the Starwood mediation (is that a proper sentence?) I would welcome you in that role. I am willing to attend in good faith. I won't throw tantrums. I'll listen to advice. I'll try to be civil at all times and will apologize if I overstep civil discourse. ''(Now if everyone would just agree to these things as well...)'' --] (] • ]) 04:39, 5 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| |Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/09&oldid=866998319 --> | |||
| == Inactivity == | |||
| Hi, Che - Just to clarify my statement above: I didn't mean to declare that the attempted mediation should be abandoned. Rather that, given some of what has (or has not) transpired, I question whether it was the most effective or appropriate approach to the situation. Perhaps the RfC should have been done first, and maybe the problem could have been taken care of that way. But if you think you can get mediation to work with the parties involved, I certainly welcome you to come on in as mediator :-) --] ]<font color="navy">♦</font>] 06:15, 5 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| I hope this finds you well. | |||
| Thank you for your offer of mediation. Might I ask a question regarding how you might conduct the mediation? Will you insist that the mediation address ''current'' issues? What will be your policy toward parties who raise user conduct accusations that have already been list on ] or in user conduct RfC's? Please let me know if you have plans to deal with such situations. Thanks. Sincerely --] <font color = "blue"><sup>]</sup></font> 12:57, 5 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| There are ongoing discussions regarding your continued token activity as an administrator. If you have serious plans to re-engage with Misplaced Pages, I would encourage you to put those plans into effect, or, at a minimum, articulate your rationale for retaining administrative rights given that you have not been involved with the project in a meaningful way for ten years. I personally would be happy to see you back, and would like to thank you for your past contributions. | |||
| I would be absolutely thrilled to have a mediator actually mediate the issues. —] 13:50, 5 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :I withdraw from the proposed meditation and also completely from the situation so please don't refuse the medation b/c of me. I proved to myself and at my own expense that ] gets to play by different rules than the rest of us, and I make it a policy not to play with a stacked deck. If you don't know what I mean, I was indef blocked for making a single joke edit (non-abusive, non-libellous and non-ban-evading) with an alternate account, while ] is still here after using 18 socks, some of them abusively. Please carry on without me, I'll not impede the mediation or remove or replace Starwood links, though I reserve the right to edit the articles in other ways. Sincerely, —] 23:23, 5 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Your mediation is fine with me. Will you open a new mediation page for it? Will it be MedCab or MedCom? ] (]) 15:26, 5 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| If you do not plan to stay involved, I would kindly encourage you to voluntarily resign your position as administrator. If that is what you decide, you may post your request at ]. | |||
| Greetings, Che - I would be happy to have you mediate the issue. Unlike BostonMa, however, I do believe that a look at the history of this issue is important, and the behavior of the people who have initiated it. I feel that my actions have been steered by the very people who turned around and objected to them, some of whom have made some rather nasty accusations and assumptions of bad faith, and now seem to want to set the bars much higher on the standards for inclusion of input than usual. Kathryn's statement above is an example: 3 statements on the futility or inappropriatness of the mediation, 3 accusations of spamming and one of "google-bombing" in a single paragraph! My attempts to find a middle-ground position and my removal of external links seem to only encourage this. I would welcome an objective view. ] 20:12, 5 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Very best and kindest regards, ''']]''' 23:11, 5 December 2018 (UTC) | |||
| == Changes to WikiProject Buffyverse (aka When Info Goes Poof) == | |||
| == Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiProject Buffyverse == | |||
| I discovered this is already being discussed. :) And there is also a more appropriate place for the discussion as well. Feel free to delete away. Not sure how to remove this completely from your talk page. Sorry for any inconvience. ] 14:19, 5 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ] (]) 13:13, 20 December 2019 (UTC) | |||
| == You have been pruned from a list == | |||
| == Future of Adopt-a-user == | |||
| '''Hi Revolving Bugbear!''' You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at ], but you haven't made any edits to the English Misplaced Pages in over 6 months. | |||
| Hi there - with Flameviper leaving Adopt-a-user for the next generation to take on, and your obvious interest in the project, I was hoping you would find to comment and help out with some suggestions for the future of the project. Please see ]. Many thanks ] 15:10, 5 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting ]. | |||
| == Starwood meditation == | |||
| '''Thank you!''' | |||
| Thanks! And nobody else had posted yet. I love it when I get to define the discourse before everybody starts accusing each other ;-) ] (]) 14:58, 6 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Message delivered to you with love by ] :) | Is this wrong? Contact ]. | Sent at 18:09, 4 April 2022 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 00:35, 24 February 2024
 | This user is not currently active on Misplaced Pages. Revolving Bugbear has not edited Misplaced Pages since 24 May 2023. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
| + | This user likes getting friendly notices. |
N Just Say No to "checkers".
Feel free to leave your questions, comments, or anything else below. You can do so by clicking this link! Please sign your comments with ~~~~.
This talk page is intended to be a safe, constructive space. Anyone is welcome to share his or her thoughts or opinions here. Personal attacks and incivility are unwelcome here.
So please, leave a message or anything else here. I will always try to respond to your messages (excepting brief acknowledgments and the like which are simply responses to mine), and I will answer on your talk page, unless the thread on my page contains more than one user. In the case that I respond on your page, I will usually copy over your comment to preserve cohesion.
Note that this talk page is bilingual. I will be happy to take questions and comments and German, and will respond in German, if you are more comfortable communicating that way. I reserve the right, however, to translate the message for others' convenience.
| Archives | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 3 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Nomination for deletion of Template:Eurohistcollaboration
Template:Eurohistcollaboration has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • 04:46, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Revolving Bugbear. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Revolving Bugbear. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Inactivity
I hope this finds you well.
There are ongoing discussions regarding your continued token activity as an administrator. If you have serious plans to re-engage with Misplaced Pages, I would encourage you to put those plans into effect, or, at a minimum, articulate your rationale for retaining administrative rights given that you have not been involved with the project in a meaningful way for ten years. I personally would be happy to see you back, and would like to thank you for your past contributions.
If you do not plan to stay involved, I would kindly encourage you to voluntarily resign your position as administrator. If that is what you decide, you may post your request at WP:BN.
Very best and kindest regards, UninvitedCompany 23:11, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiProject Buffyverse
Template:WikiProject Buffyverse has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 13:13, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
You have been pruned from a list
Hi Revolving Bugbear! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject History/Outreach/Participants, but you haven't made any edits to the English Misplaced Pages in over 6 months.
Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Misplaced Pages:WikiProject History/Outreach/Participants.
Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:09, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
Categories: