Misplaced Pages

Outline of tort law: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:54, 5 November 2019 editIra Leviton (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users331,101 editsm pervision->perversion - Fix a typo in one click← Previous edit Latest revision as of 12:17, 30 October 2023 edit undoThe Transhumanist (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers302,803 edits →External links: recategorize per the category's entry, replaced: [[Category:Misplaced Pages outlines → [[Category:OutlinesTag: AWB 
(11 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|1=Overview of and topical guide to tort law}} {{Short description|1=Overview of and topical guide to tort law}}
{{tort law}}
<!--... Attention: THIS IS AN OUTLINE <!--... Attention: THIS IS AN OUTLINE


part of the set of 740+ outlines listed at part of the set of 830+ outlines listed at
]. ].


Misplaced Pages outlines are Misplaced Pages outlines are
Line 10: Line 11:
content navigation systems content navigation systems


See ] See ] and
for more details. ] for more details.
Further improvements Further improvements
to this outline are on the way to this outline are on the way
⚫ ...-->The following ] is provided as an overview of and introduction to tort law in ] jurisdictions:
...-->
{{See also|Index of tort articles}}

⚫ The following ] is provided as an overview of and introduction to tort law:


''']''' &ndash; defines what a legal injury is and, therefore, whether a person may be held liable for an injury they have caused. Legal injuries are not limited to physical injuries. They may also include emotional, economic, or reputational injuries as well as violations of privacy, property, or constitutional rights. ''']''' &ndash; defines what a legal injury is and, therefore, whether a person may be held liable for an injury they have caused. Legal injuries are not limited to physical injuries. They may also include emotional, economic, or reputational injuries as well as violations of privacy, property, or constitutional rights.
Line 24: Line 22:


==Types of torts== ==Types of torts==
===Torts against the person===
⚫ ===Intentional torts===

] &ndash; category of torts that describes a civil wrong resulting from an intentional act on the part of the tortfeasor (alleged wrongdoer).
] &ndash; category of torts that describes a civil wrong that causes physical harm to the complainant:

* ] &ndash; intentionally and voluntarily causing the reasonable apprehension of an immediate harmful or offensive contact. * ] &ndash; intentionally and voluntarily causing the reasonable apprehension of an immediate harmful or offensive contact.
* ] &ndash; Bringing about an unconsentful harmful or offensive contact with a person or to something closely associated with that person (such as an item of clothing). It differs from assault in that it requires actual contact. * ] &ndash; Bringing about an unconsentful harmful or offensive contact with a person or to something closely associated with that person (such as an item of clothing). It differs from assault in that it requires actual contact.
* ] &ndash; A person is intentionally confined without legal authority. * ] &ndash; A person is intentionally confined without legal authority.
* ] &ndash; Intentional conduct that results in extreme emotional distress. * ] &ndash; Intentional conduct that results in extreme emotional distress.

⚫ * ] &ndash; A possible excuse against civil or criminal liability under the defense that they should not be held liable as the actions were not taken without their permission.
⚫ ===Negligent torts===
⚫ * ] &ndash; The defense of necessity gives the state or individual property of another; typically invoked only against the intentional torts of ], ], or ]. It is expressed in Latin as ''necessitas inducit privilegium quod jura privata'', "Necessity induces a privilege because of a private right."

⚫ * ] &ndash; Civilians acting on their own behalf to engage in violence for the sake of self-defense of one's own life or the lives of others, including the use of ]. Differs from necessity in that it is usually the response to an immediate danger.
⚫ ] &ndash; failure to exercise the care that a reasonably prudent person would exercise in like circumstances
⚫ * ] &ndash; There can be no liability in negligence unless the claimant established that he or she was owed a ] by the defendant and that there has been a breach of that duty.
⚫ * ] &ndash; The idea that liability may be so remote from the defendant that the negligence was not foreseeable or preventable by that party.
⚫ * ] - The idea that one has a ] to use reasonable care to avoid causing ]al ] to another individual.
* ] or ] &ndash; Negligence in the provision of a professional service causing harm to the claimant. Common varieties include ] and ]
* ] &ndash; Conduct which by its very nature gives rise to a presumption of negligence.


===Property torts=== ===Property torts===
* ] &ndash; Committed when an individual intentionally enters the land of another without lawful excuse. It is actionable ''per se'', and thus the party whose land was entered may sue even if no actual harm is done. * ] &ndash; Committed when an individual intentionally enters the land of another without lawful excuse. It is actionable ''per se'', and thus the party whose land was entered may sue even if no actual harm is done.
* ] &ndash; Committed when an individual intentionally interferes with the personal property of another. Slight deprivation, like briefly placing a hand on someone else's car, is not actionable. * ] &ndash; Committed when an individual intentionally interferes with the personal property of another. Slight deprivation, like briefly placing a hand on someone else's car, is not actionable.
* ] &ndash; An intentional tort to personal property where the defendant's willful interference with the chattel deprives plaintiff of the possession of the same. * ] &ndash; An intentional tort to personal property where the defendant's willful interference with the chattel deprives plaintiff of the possession of the same.
⚫ * ] &ndash; Denial of quiet enjoyment to owners of ]. A private nuisance is an unreasonable, unwarranted, or unlawful interference with another person's private use and enjoyment of his or her property; whereas a public nuisance is an interference with the rights of the public generally. The test to determine whether an interference is reasonable is whether the gravity of the harm is outweighed by the social benefit of the nuisance.
⚫ * ] &ndash; An action for the wrongful detention of goods, initiated by an individual who claims to have a greater right to their immediate possession than the current possessor or holder.
⚫ * ] &ndash; Signifies the recovery by a person of goods unlawfully taken out of his or her possession by a legal process.
⚫ * ] &ndash; A form of lawsuit for recovery of damages for wrongful taking of personal property.


===Dignitary torts=== ===Dignitary torts===
] &ndash; a specific category of intentional torts where the cause of action is being subjected to certain kinds of indignities. ] &ndash; a specific category of intentional torts where the cause of action is being subjected to certain kinds of indignities.
* ] &ndash; The communication of a statement that makes a false claim, expressively stated or implied to be factual, that may harm the reputation of an entity. * ] &ndash; The communication of a statement that makes a false claim, expressively stated or implied to be factual, that may harm the reputation of an entity.
** ] &ndash; Written defamation
** ] &ndash; Spoken defamation
** ] &ndash; A tort unique to American jurisprudence which covers defamatory statements which, although true, can give rise to false negative perceptions of the claimant.
* ] &ndash; The unlawful intrusion into the personal life of another person without just cause. * ] &ndash; The unlawful intrusion into the personal life of another person without just cause.
* ] &ndash; Protects private information conveyed in confidence; typically requires that the information be of a confidential nature, communicated in confidence, and was disclosed to the detriment of the claimant. * ] &ndash; Protects private information conveyed in confidence; typically requires that the information be of a confidential nature, communicated in confidence, and was disclosed to the detriment of the claimant.
Line 52: Line 59:


===Economic torts=== ===Economic torts===

] &ndash; torts that provide the common law rules on liability which arise out of business transactions such as interference with economic or business relationships and are likely to involve pure economic loss. Also called business torts. ] &ndash; torts that provide the common law rules on liability which arise out of business transactions such as interference with economic or business relationships and are likely to involve pure economic loss. Also called business torts.
* ] &ndash; Making of a false representation by one party with an intention to induce another party into an act of commission or omission owing to which the later party suffers a damage. The first Party may or may not be the benefited by the damage caused to second party. Also, the first party need not be in collusion with someone who actually benefited. * ] &ndash; Making of a false representation by one party with an intention to induce another party into an act of commission or omission owing to which the later party suffers a damage. The first Party may or may not be the benefited by the damage caused to second party. Also, the first party need not be in collusion with someone who actually benefited.
Line 58: Line 64:
* ] &ndash; An agreement between two or more parties to deprive a third party of legal rights or deceive a third party to obtain an illegal objective. * ] &ndash; An agreement between two or more parties to deprive a third party of legal rights or deceive a third party to obtain an illegal objective.
* ] &ndash; Contractual obligations not to trade are illegal agreements on public policy grounds unless they are reasonable in the interests concerning both parties and the public at large; this mainly affects post-termination restrictive covenants in employment contracts. * ] &ndash; Contractual obligations not to trade are illegal agreements on public policy grounds unless they are reasonable in the interests concerning both parties and the public at large; this mainly affects post-termination restrictive covenants in employment contracts.
* ] &ndash; The tort of selling goods or services in a manner that falsely causes customers to believe they originate from a different brand or supplier.


⚫ ===Strict and absolute liability torts===
⚫ ===Nuisance===
⚫ {{see|Strict liability| Absolute liability}}
⚫ * ] &ndash; Denial of quiet enjoyment to owners of ]. A private nuisance is an unreasonable, unwarranted, or unlawful interference with another person's private use and enjoyment of his or her property; whereas a public nuisance is an interference with the rights of the public generally. The test to determine whether an interference is reasonable is whether the gravity of the harm is outweighed by the social benefit of the nuisance.

===Negligence===
⚫ ] &ndash; failure to exercise the care that a reasonably prudent person would exercise in like circumstances
* ] &ndash; Obligation imposed on an individual requiring that they adhere to a reasonable ] while performing acts that could possibly harm others.
⚫ * ] &ndash; There can be no liability in negligence unless the claimant established that he or she was owed a ] by the defendant and that there has been a breach of that duty.
* ] &ndash; Whether or not a given injury would have occurred without a breach of duty.
⚫ * ] &ndash; The idea that liability may be so remote from the defendant that the negligence was not foreseeable or preventable by that party.
⚫ * ] &ndash; Places a monetary value on the harm done, following the principle of '']'', "restoration to the original condition".
⚫ * ] - The idea that one has a ] to use reasonable care to avoid causing ]al ] to another individual.

===Duty to visitors===
⚫ * ] &ndash; A landowner may be liable for injuries to children trespassing on the land if the injury is caused by a hazardous object or condition on the land is likely to attract children.
The duty to visitors in tort law is dependent on how the party involved not owning the land has entered the land.
⚫ * ] &ndash; A person who is trespassing on a property without the permission on the owner. Conversely, the status of a visitor as a trespasser grants certain rights to the visitor if they are injured due to the negligence of the property owner.
⚫ * ] &ndash; A person who is on the property of another, despite the fact that the property is not open to the general public; historically, ] have been considered licensees.
⚫ * ] &ndash; A person who is invited to the land by the possessor of the land, either as a guest or to conduct business.

⚫ ===Strict liability torts===
⚫ {{see|Strict liability}}
* ] &ndash; The area of law in which products manufacturers, distributors and sellers are held responsible for the injuries caused by their products. Generally, a product liability claim is based on either a design defect, a manufacturing defect, or a failure to warn. This topic is closely associated with ], ] and ]. * ] &ndash; The area of law in which products manufacturers, distributors and sellers are held responsible for the injuries caused by their products. Generally, a product liability claim is based on either a design defect, a manufacturing defect, or a failure to warn. This topic is closely associated with ], ] and ].
* ] &ndash; An activity so dangerous that a person engaged in such an activity can be held strictly liable for injuries caused to another person, regardless of whether or not reasonable precautions were taken to prevent others from being injured. * ] &ndash; An activity so dangerous that a person engaged in such an activity can be held strictly liable for injuries caused to another person, regardless of whether or not reasonable precautions were taken to prevent others from being injured.
* ] &ndash; The rule in ], in Indian tort law is a unique outgrowth of the doctrine of ] for ]. Under this principle of absolute liability, an enterprise is absolutely liable without exceptions to compensate everyone affected by any accident resulting from the operation of hazardous activity.<ref>''MC Mehta v Union of India'' AIR 1987 SC 1086 (Oleum Gas Leak Case).</ref>


==Liability, defenses, remedies== ==Liability, defences, remedies==
===Liability===
⚫ * ] &ndash; A landowner may be liable for injuries to children trespassing on the land if the injury is caused by a hazardous object or condition on the land is likely to attract children.
* ] &ndash; Liability arises when a tortfeasor fails to observe a duty of care toward the claimant. With regard to liability for landowners, the duty to visitors in tort law is dependent on how the claimant entered the land:
⚫ ** ] &ndash; A person who is trespassing on a property without the permission on the owner. Conversely, the status of a visitor as a trespasser grants certain rights to the visitor if they are injured due to the negligence of the property owner.
⚫ ** ] &ndash; A person who is on the property of another, despite the fact that the property is not open to the general public; historically, ] have been considered licensees.
⚫ ** ] &ndash; A person who is invited to the land by the possessor of the land, either as a guest or to conduct business.
* ] &ndash; A partial defense that reduces the amount of damages a plaintiff can claim based upon the degree to which the plaintiff's own negligence contributed to the damages. Most jurisdictions have adopted this doctrine; those not adopting it are Alabama, Maryland, North Carolina, Virginia, And Washington D.C. * ] &ndash; A partial defense that reduces the amount of damages a plaintiff can claim based upon the degree to which the plaintiff's own negligence contributed to the damages. Most jurisdictions have adopted this doctrine; those not adopting it are Alabama, Maryland, North Carolina, Virginia, And Washington D.C.
* ] &ndash; A defense based on negligence of the plaintiff wherein the plaintiff's actions caused the event which drew the suit. An example of this is a pedestrian crossing a road carelessly and was hit by a driver driving carelessly. * ] &ndash; A defense based on negligence of the plaintiff wherein the plaintiff's actions caused the event which drew the suit. An example of this is a pedestrian crossing a road carelessly and was hit by a driver driving carelessly.
Line 89: Line 84:
* ] &ndash; Doctrine under which an individual is held liable for all consequences resulting from his actions even if the victim suffers an unusually high levels of damage (i.e., a pre-existing vulnerability or medical condition). The term comes an example argument that if a person had a skull as delicate as the shell of an egg, and an assailant was unaware of that condition hit that person on the head and it subsequently broke, the responsible party should be liable for all damages resulting from the content. * ] &ndash; Doctrine under which an individual is held liable for all consequences resulting from his actions even if the victim suffers an unusually high levels of damage (i.e., a pre-existing vulnerability or medical condition). The term comes an example argument that if a person had a skull as delicate as the shell of an egg, and an assailant was unaware of that condition hit that person on the head and it subsequently broke, the responsible party should be liable for all damages resulting from the content.
* ] &ndash; A form of strict secondary liability arising from ]. The responsibility of the superior for the acts of their subordinates, under which, they are responsible for negligent acts committed by their employees during the course of their employment.<ref>Construction Accident Law: A Comprehensive Guide to Legal Liability. Marc M. Schneier. American Bar Association, 1999.</ref> * ] &ndash; A form of strict secondary liability arising from ]. The responsibility of the superior for the acts of their subordinates, under which, they are responsible for negligent acts committed by their employees during the course of their employment.<ref>Construction Accident Law: A Comprehensive Guide to Legal Liability. Marc M. Schneier. American Bar Association, 1999.</ref>

⚫ * ] &ndash; Latin for "To a willing person, no injury is done", this common law doctrine means that if someone willingly puts themselves in a position where harm might result, they can not sue if harm occurs. That is, a boxer consents to being hit, and the injuries related to boxing are thus not actionable (although if his opponent were to hit him with an iron bar, that would be actionable as he did not know such things would occur).<ref>A Selection of Legal Maxims, Classified and Illustrated. Herbert Broom, Herbert Francis Manisty, Charles Francis Cagney. W. Maxwell, 1884, p 262.</ref>
⚫ ===Remedies===
* ] &ndash; "From a dishonorable cause an action does not arise". In The United States, this legal doctrine is more commonly known as equitability of ], and it prevents a criminal from bringing a claim against another criminal.<ref>Sourcebook on tort law. Graham Stephenson. Routledge Cavendish, 2000.</ref>
] available vary depending on the type of tort committed and include:

⚫ * ] &ndash; Monetary compensation or restitution for the claimant under the principle of ].
*] &ndash; A court order requiring or forbidding an individual or entity to take/from taking a particular course of action.
*] &ndash; A process whereby a court identifies the proceeds of a tort for the purpose of assessing compensation.
⚫ * ] &ndash; An action for the wrongful detention of goods, initiated by an individual who claims to have a greater right to their immediate possession than the current possessor or holder.
⚫ * ] &ndash; Signifies the recovery by a person of goods unlawfully taken out of his or her possession by a legal process.
⚫ * ] &ndash; A form of lawsuit for recovery of damages for wrongful taking of personal property.

===Defences===
⚫ * ] &ndash; A possible excuse against civil or criminal liability under the defence that they should not be held liable as the actions were not taken without their permission.
⚫ ** ] &ndash; Latin for "To a willing person, no injury is done", this common law doctrine means that if someone willingly puts themselves in a position where harm might result, they can not sue if harm occurs. That is, a boxer consents to being hit, and the injuries related to boxing are thus not actionable (although if his opponent were to hit him with an iron bar, that would be actionable as he did not know such things would occur).<ref>A Selection of Legal Maxims, Classified and Illustrated. Herbert Broom, Herbert Francis Manisty, Charles Francis Cagney. W. Maxwell, 1884, p 262.</ref>
⚫ * ] &ndash; The defense of necessity gives the state or individual property of another; typically invoked only against the intentional torts of ], ], or ]. It is expressed in Latin as ''necessitas inducit privilegium quod jura privata'', "Necessity induces a privilege because of a private right."
⚫ * ] &ndash; Civilians acting on their own behalf to engage in violence for the sake of self-defence of one's own life or the lives of others, including the use of ]. Differs from necessity in that it is usually the response to an immediate danger.

==Other terms and principles==
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]


== See also == == See also ==
Line 104: Line 122:


] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]

Latest revision as of 12:17, 30 October 2023

Overview of and topical guide to tort law
Part of the common law series
Tort law
(Outline)
Trespass to the person
Property torts
Dignitary torts
Negligent torts
Principles of negligence
Strict and absolute liability
Nuisance
Economic torts
Defences
Liability
Remedies
Other topics in tort law
By jurisdiction
Other common law areas

The following outline is provided as an overview of and introduction to tort law in common law jurisdictions:

Tort law – defines what a legal injury is and, therefore, whether a person may be held liable for an injury they have caused. Legal injuries are not limited to physical injuries. They may also include emotional, economic, or reputational injuries as well as violations of privacy, property, or constitutional rights.

Types of torts

Torts against the person

Torts (trespass) against the person – category of torts that describes a civil wrong that causes physical harm to the complainant:

  • Assault (tort) – intentionally and voluntarily causing the reasonable apprehension of an immediate harmful or offensive contact.
  • Battery (tort) – Bringing about an unconsentful harmful or offensive contact with a person or to something closely associated with that person (such as an item of clothing). It differs from assault in that it requires actual contact.
  • False imprisonment – A person is intentionally confined without legal authority.
  • Intentional infliction of emotional distress – Intentional conduct that results in extreme emotional distress.

Negligent torts

Negligence – failure to exercise the care that a reasonably prudent person would exercise in like circumstances

Property torts

  • Trespass to land – Committed when an individual intentionally enters the land of another without lawful excuse. It is actionable per se, and thus the party whose land was entered may sue even if no actual harm is done.
  • Trespass to chattels – Committed when an individual intentionally interferes with the personal property of another. Slight deprivation, like briefly placing a hand on someone else's car, is not actionable.
  • Conversion (law) – An intentional tort to personal property where the defendant's willful interference with the chattel deprives plaintiff of the possession of the same.
  • Nuisance – Denial of quiet enjoyment to owners of real property. A private nuisance is an unreasonable, unwarranted, or unlawful interference with another person's private use and enjoyment of his or her property; whereas a public nuisance is an interference with the rights of the public generally. The test to determine whether an interference is reasonable is whether the gravity of the harm is outweighed by the social benefit of the nuisance.

Dignitary torts

Dignitary torts – a specific category of intentional torts where the cause of action is being subjected to certain kinds of indignities.

  • Defamation – The communication of a statement that makes a false claim, expressively stated or implied to be factual, that may harm the reputation of an entity.
    • Libel – Written defamation
    • Slander – Spoken defamation
    • False light – A tort unique to American jurisprudence which covers defamatory statements which, although true, can give rise to false negative perceptions of the claimant.
  • Invasion of privacy – The unlawful intrusion into the personal life of another person without just cause.
  • Breach of confidence – Protects private information conveyed in confidence; typically requires that the information be of a confidential nature, communicated in confidence, and was disclosed to the detriment of the claimant.
  • Abuse of process – A malicious and deliberate misuse or perversion of regularly issued court process not justified by the underlying legal action.
  • Malicious prosecution – Similar to abuse of process, but includes intent, pursuing without probable cause, and dismissal in favor of the victim. In some jurisdictions, malicious prosecution is reserved for the wrongful initiation of criminal proceedings, while malicious use of process refers to the wrongful initiation of civil proceedings.
  • Alienation of affections – Brought by a spouse against a third party, whom the spouse believes has interfered with his or her marriage. There is no requirement that all affections in the marriage be destroyed, only that there has been some diminution in the love and affection between the married couple.

Economic torts

Economic torts – torts that provide the common law rules on liability which arise out of business transactions such as interference with economic or business relationships and are likely to involve pure economic loss. Also called business torts.

  • Fraud – Making of a false representation by one party with an intention to induce another party into an act of commission or omission owing to which the later party suffers a damage. The first Party may or may not be the benefited by the damage caused to second party. Also, the first party need not be in collusion with someone who actually benefited.
  • Tortious interference – One person intentionally damages the plaintiff's contractual or other business relationships.
  • Conspiracy (civil) – An agreement between two or more parties to deprive a third party of legal rights or deceive a third party to obtain an illegal objective.
  • Restraint of trade – Contractual obligations not to trade are illegal agreements on public policy grounds unless they are reasonable in the interests concerning both parties and the public at large; this mainly affects post-termination restrictive covenants in employment contracts.
  • Passing off – The tort of selling goods or services in a manner that falsely causes customers to believe they originate from a different brand or supplier.

Strict and absolute liability torts

Further information: Strict liability and Absolute liability
  • Product liability – The area of law in which products manufacturers, distributors and sellers are held responsible for the injuries caused by their products. Generally, a product liability claim is based on either a design defect, a manufacturing defect, or a failure to warn. This topic is closely associated with negligence, breach of warranty and consumer protection.
  • Ultrahazardous activity – An activity so dangerous that a person engaged in such an activity can be held strictly liable for injuries caused to another person, regardless of whether or not reasonable precautions were taken to prevent others from being injured.
  • Absolute liability – The rule in M. C. Mehta v. Union of India, in Indian tort law is a unique outgrowth of the doctrine of strict liability for ultrahazardous activities. Under this principle of absolute liability, an enterprise is absolutely liable without exceptions to compensate everyone affected by any accident resulting from the operation of hazardous activity.

Liability, defences, remedies

Liability

  • Attractive nuisance – A landowner may be liable for injuries to children trespassing on the land if the injury is caused by a hazardous object or condition on the land is likely to attract children.
  • Duty of care – Liability arises when a tortfeasor fails to observe a duty of care toward the claimant. With regard to liability for landowners, the duty to visitors in tort law is dependent on how the claimant entered the land:
    • Trespasser – A person who is trespassing on a property without the permission on the owner. Conversely, the status of a visitor as a trespasser grants certain rights to the visitor if they are injured due to the negligence of the property owner.
    • Licensee – A person who is on the property of another, despite the fact that the property is not open to the general public; historically, emergency workers have been considered licensees.
    • Invitee – A person who is invited to the land by the possessor of the land, either as a guest or to conduct business.
  • Comparative negligence – A partial defense that reduces the amount of damages a plaintiff can claim based upon the degree to which the plaintiff's own negligence contributed to the damages. Most jurisdictions have adopted this doctrine; those not adopting it are Alabama, Maryland, North Carolina, Virginia, And Washington D.C.
  • Contributory negligence – A defense based on negligence of the plaintiff wherein the plaintiff's actions caused the event which drew the suit. An example of this is a pedestrian crossing a road carelessly and was hit by a driver driving carelessly.
  • Last clear chance – Doctrine under which a plaintiff can recover against comparative and contributory negligence defenses if they can demonstrate that the defendant had the last opportunity to avoid the accident.
  • Eggshell skull – Doctrine under which an individual is held liable for all consequences resulting from his actions even if the victim suffers an unusually high levels of damage (i.e., a pre-existing vulnerability or medical condition). The term comes an example argument that if a person had a skull as delicate as the shell of an egg, and an assailant was unaware of that condition hit that person on the head and it subsequently broke, the responsible party should be liable for all damages resulting from the content.
  • Vicarious liability – A form of strict secondary liability arising from respondeat superior. The responsibility of the superior for the acts of their subordinates, under which, they are responsible for negligent acts committed by their employees during the course of their employment.

Remedies

Remedies available vary depending on the type of tort committed and include:

  • Damages – Monetary compensation or restitution for the claimant under the principle of restitutio ad integrum.
  • Injunction – A court order requiring or forbidding an individual or entity to take/from taking a particular course of action.
  • Tracing – A process whereby a court identifies the proceeds of a tort for the purpose of assessing compensation.
  • Detinue – An action for the wrongful detention of goods, initiated by an individual who claims to have a greater right to their immediate possession than the current possessor or holder.
  • Replevin – Signifies the recovery by a person of goods unlawfully taken out of his or her possession by a legal process.
  • Trover – A form of lawsuit for recovery of damages for wrongful taking of personal property.

Defences

  • Consent – A possible excuse against civil or criminal liability under the defence that they should not be held liable as the actions were not taken without their permission.
    • Volenti non fit injuria – Latin for "To a willing person, no injury is done", this common law doctrine means that if someone willingly puts themselves in a position where harm might result, they can not sue if harm occurs. That is, a boxer consents to being hit, and the injuries related to boxing are thus not actionable (although if his opponent were to hit him with an iron bar, that would be actionable as he did not know such things would occur).
  • Necessity (tort) – The defense of necessity gives the state or individual property of another; typically invoked only against the intentional torts of Trespass to chattels, trespass to land, or conversion (law). It is expressed in Latin as necessitas inducit privilegium quod jura privata, "Necessity induces a privilege because of a private right."
  • Self-defence – Civilians acting on their own behalf to engage in violence for the sake of self-defence of one's own life or the lives of others, including the use of deadly force. Differs from necessity in that it is usually the response to an immediate danger.

Other terms and principles

See also

References

  1. MC Mehta v Union of India AIR 1987 SC 1086 (Oleum Gas Leak Case).
  2. Construction Accident Law: A Comprehensive Guide to Legal Liability. Marc M. Schneier. American Bar Association, 1999.
  3. A Selection of Legal Maxims, Classified and Illustrated. Herbert Broom, Herbert Francis Manisty, Charles Francis Cagney. W. Maxwell, 1884, p 262.

External links

Misplaced Pages outlines
Categories: