| Revision as of 23:54, 6 December 2006 editYaksha (talk | contribs)6,342 edits →Stop moving pages← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 04:56, 20 November 2023 edit undoDonner60 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers235,872 edits not around since Nov 2007 | ||
| (116 intermediate revisions by 38 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{not around|3=11 November 2007}} | |||
| <div style="border: 1px solid #88b; padding: 5px; margin: 0em;"> | |||
| ==] == | |||
| <font color="#330066">If I've left a note on your talk page, then your talk page will be on my watchlist. You can reply there if you want. </font> | |||
| Thank you for taking the time to participate at the discussion in my Request for Adminship. Unfortunately the nomination did not succeed, but please rest assured that I am still in full support of the Misplaced Pages project. I listened carefully to all concerns, and will do my best to incorporate all of the constructive advice that I received, into my future actions on Misplaced Pages. If you can think of any other ways that I can further improve, please let me know. Best wishes, ]]] 04:08, 5 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Uhhh, I must be missing something... == | |||
| <font color="#330066">If you leave a note here on my talk page, then I will be replying here unless otherwise requested. </font></div> | |||
| Can you explain the move to ]? This is a well known term, and it seems extremely unlikely that people looking for the term, or linking to it, would be looking for an episode of a TV show. I read the notes you pointed to in the checkin notes, and the don't really seem to change my mind; this seems pedantic at best. I would like to move it back in order to keep the naming similar to other articles, as well as avoid missed hits on links and searches. Is there any ''good'' reason for this policy? ] 03:09, 6 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| <br> | |||
| :Yaksha isn't that active these days, so maybe I can help. Article titles are case-sensitive, so the term you speak of exists at ]. For more information on the guidelines behind article titles, see ]. -- ] 07:17, 6 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks for the reply. I should have been more specific, the articles were moved to names without "{Stargate SG-1)" in the title, which struck me as ''losing'' information. I'm going to do a move. ] 13:04, 6 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Yeah, I'm really not around these days because of some real life commitments. Thanks for answering here Ned. --] 11:59, 10 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Here Comes the Squirtle Squad == | |||
| == Correct me if I'm wrong, but... == | |||
| These articles need to be nominated for deletion also. These pages have little summaries. | |||
| Weren't we supposed to go with the most popular spellings in terms of Hunter x Hunter characters? "Razor" has way more results in English than "Reiza" in both Google and Yahoo. --] 03:32, 12 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Please check them out Ryulong and her sockpuppets are vandaizing these pages. | |||
| :Yes, but "razor" is the name of a knife. "Reiza" is an obscure name of a character in Hunter x Hunter. Of course "razor" would have more results than "Reiza". Even if you searched "razor hunter x hunter" in Google, after a good 50 pages, Google will return search results dealing with razor shavers rather than hxh. --] 11:29, 2 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| # Pokéball Peril | |||
| # The First Pokemon! The Last Battle!! | |||
| # The Pokemon Center is Very Busy! | |||
| # Deciding Match! VS Regice!! | |||
| # Begin! From Futaba Town to Masago Town!! | |||
| # Find Pikachu! Route 202! | |||
| # Meowth Rules! | |||
| # Get the Show on the Road | |||
| # A Ruin with a View | |||
| # Perap and the Pokémon Comedian! | |||
| # Mean With Envy | |||
| # Attack! The Stray Manyula!! | |||
| # The Scuffle of the Legends | |||
| # Battle Pyramid Again! VS Registeel! | |||
| # Pacifidlog Jam | |||
| # Eight Ain't Enough | |||
| <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]) 11:18, 28 October 2006 (UTC).</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> | |||
| :That's nice. I'll have a look at them. But you have no right to slip them into my AfD and make it look like as if i've nominated them. Stop doing it. --] 01:32, 28 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Hatsu Types.jpg== | |||
| ::This guy is reverting ], on the grounds that you are looking into the article. Any suggestions on what to do? I have no interest in breaking ]. -] <sup>]</sup> 02:08, 28 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Thanks for uploading ''']'''. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at ] carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at ] is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. | |||
| If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our ]. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair -->] (]) 23:19, 13 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::I've never even heard of the article before. | |||
| == Digimon Wiki == | |||
| :::He tried to slip a bunch of articles into an AfD i started on the basis that "those articles should be nominated too". I told him to stop slipping things into my AfD and that i'll go take a look at the articles he suggested personally. | |||
| I know the Digimon WikiProject has kind of died off on wikipedia after the transwiki, but we're still going strong at the ]. I was wondering if you'd like to join over there, so that we can get the old team back together and really make the place something to be proud of. Cheers!<small>] ]</small> 04:21, 21 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::But it doesn't really matter. People shouldn't be doing things to articles on the basis of an AfD until ''after'' the AfD is finished. | |||
| == Pointer to discussion about TV episode redirects == | |||
| :::He's already suspected to be a sock and made a huge mess on the said AfD (deleting other people's comments). Maybe report him in for vandalism? --] 02:13, 28 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Hi, Yaksha. It's been a while since the dispute about TV episode article naming. I see you're not active on Misplaced Pages any more, but just in case you're interested I wanted to let you know that there's a new (much smaller, I hope!) discussion about whether to keep the redirects that have "unnecessary" disambiguation or not — one of the byproducts of an early compromise move in that debate. The new discussion is at ], with related discussions at ]. Hope to see you there. —] <small>(] • ])</small> 18:33, 8 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::I knew the stuff about the AfD, he kept trying to keep the notice and kill off the redirect that was put on. Oh well. -] <sup>]</sup> 02:17, 28 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Redirect of ]== | |||
| :::(edit conflict) There was an AfD notice on it? The articles weren't even nominated for AfD. I'm going to remove them. I think, even if the articles should be bundled in, it's quite rude after so many days to add more article into the AfD. At least, it's sort of unfair for the people who voted early. --] 02:21, 28 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ]Hello, this is a message from ]. A tag has been placed on ], by {{#ifeq:{{{nom}}}|1|] (] '''·''' ]),}} another Misplaced Pages user, requesting that it be ] from Misplaced Pages. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because ] is a redirect to a non-existent page (]). <br><br>To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting ], please affix the template <nowiki>{{hangon}}</nowiki> to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at ]. Feel free to contact the ] if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click ''' ] (]) 08:51, 17 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == ] nomination of ] == | |||
| ::::I don't want to be blocked for indefenity. I am not a sockpuppett. I'm sorry I'm just a 15 year old boy.. ] | |||
| ]An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for ]. The nominated article is ]. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also ] and "]"). | |||
| :::::Then don't get into edit wars with people. If someone reverts your edit, and you don't understand why (or don't agree), try talking first. It means less fustration for you and for everyone else. --] 02:23, 28 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::May you include them in the AfD??? <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]) 12:33, 28 October 2006 (UTC).</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> | |||
| :::::::For a start, sign your comments. Secondly, maybe. I'm not sure. Including articles ''after'' an AfD has started can be rude, and unfair for people who voted early on. --] 02:36, 28 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::I have talked to Ryulong (my friend has) and she and A Man in Black continues to revert / merge the articles. I need help!! ] | |||
| ::They continue to revert them because they are not part of the AfD discussion. Therefore, you have no right to state that they may not be changed. And seeing as consensus over at ] is to merge them, you're not going to get anywhere. -] <sup>]</sup> 02:40, 28 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::::(edit conflict) no you don't. what they are doing is fine. They're probably just carrying out merge plans as decided from discussions in the pokemon collaboration project. --] 02:42, 28 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to ]. Please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). | |||
| :::::::::: But does'nt that seem that the PCP is a sort of Dictatorship? <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]) 12:45, 28 October 2006 (UTC).</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> | |||
| You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the ] template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. | |||
| ::No. It's called consensus, and one person isn't allowed to override it. Especially when said person does not actually want the articles to be there, but wants them kept so they can go on AfD. -] <sup>]</sup> 02:47, 28 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| '''Please note:''' This is an automatic notification by a ]. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --] (]) 01:10, 26 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::The project takes care of pokemon articles. There are tons of users involved in it. They discussed about what to do with pokemon articles. Anyone can join the project and join in discussions. ANd now they're carrying out mass merges i believe. Also, sockpuppetry is VERY not allowed. Pokeant just got blocked so you pop up with a new account? Lastly, sign your comments!--] 02:51, 28 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == File:Email in pic.JPG listed for deletion == | |||
| :::Why do you want the articles to be removed? All of the other episode pages of different shows have pages. Whats so bad of having pages of Pokemon there are like 30+ people at the PCP it would be some extra work to keep the articles vandal-free. | |||
| A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw --> ] <sup>]</sup> 23:44, 21 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :::Do you want me to tell why I was blocked? I was offened when someone wrote the GD word. My mommy and the pastor (I go to church) told me that, word was a very very bad word. I'm 15 year old. Also I am new to Misplaced Pages.<small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]).</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> | |||
| == Notification of automated file description generation == | |||
| Your upload of ] or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page. | |||
| This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions ]. Thanks!<!--Template:Un-botfill-null--> ''Message delivered by ] (])'' 12:01, 30 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| Let me lay out the bad things you've done. | |||
| *Another one of your uploads, ], has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks!<!--Template:Un-botfill--> ''Message delivered by ] (])'' 12:04, 30 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| Disrupting Misplaced Pages to make a point<br> | |||
| == List of Ultimate Digimon listed at ] == | |||
| Adding AfD notices to articles not on AfD<br> | |||
| ] | |||
| Going against consensus and restoring articles you don't even like<br> | |||
| An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''List of Ultimate Digimon'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you have not already done so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 22:57, 12 August 2015 (UTC) | |||
| Adding new articles to an AfD<br> | |||
| == List of Champion Digimon listed at ] == | |||
| Editing other people's comments<br> | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''List of Champion Digimon'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you have not already done so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 22:57, 12 August 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == List of Rookie Digimon listed at ] == | |||
| Don't do pretty much everything you've done. I reccomend that you go read all of the ].-] <sup>]</sup> 02:57, 28 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''List of Rookie Digimon'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you have not already done so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 22:58, 12 August 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == The 4400 AfD == | |||
| == List of Armor Digimon listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| Hi. Just wanted to say I strongly support your AfD for The 4400 episodes. I cannot see how the closing admin made his judgement to keep, and I have posted on ] asking for a clarification of his reasoning. If you want to take this AfD to ], I will support you. ''']''' <sup>(]•])</sup> <small>]</small> 08:19, 30 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''List of Armor Digimon'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you have not already done so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 22:58, 12 August 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :I too would support challenging this in DRV. Misplaced Pages is not a democracy, and I fail to see how numbers outweighed rational arguments. -- ] 08:22, 30 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| No, i'm not planning to take it up to deletion review. I have no idea how deletion review works, and i'm really not interested in picking fights with anyone. There're a few people who seem bent on protecting their articles. And they seem to have far more time and effort to spare defending what they want on wikipedia than I. I am, however, planning to renominate them for deletion if there is no improvement on the articles after a few months. Since the main reason for keep was that the articles will get better in the future. --] 04:48, 1 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Hello. I'd like to suggest that you put the articles up for deletion again in a few months, citing the previous AfD then. This is the most peaceful solution; thanks. —] / 17:22, 6 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==I hope I haven't embarrased you== | |||
| Yaksha, | |||
| I'm just writing to let you know that I've mentioned an earlier incident involving you, me, and another user that took place a few days ago. I didn't use your name, but I did provide enough documentation that it can be easily discovered. I know you said you weren't particularly bothered by the incident, but I was. I took you up on your departing comment and edit summary that the two of us can have fun by continuing our discussion about that incident without you. (I see in the above comments that the catalyst for that incident, the 4400 nomination, has not been resolved to your satisfaction.) | |||
| I have no intention to offend you, or drag you into anything. I just need to resolve a chronic personal conflict between myself and another user. There's no need for your participation in any way. I apologize if I overstepped. | |||
| --] 16:04, 2 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| I forgot to reference the continued discusson. It can be found ]. --] 16:11, 2 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :No, it's okay. No harm done. --] 04:18, 3 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == disambiguation == | |||
| When television episodes are named after things, they need disambiguation. This applies to most of the ''Desperate Housewives'' episodes, which are usually named for Stephen Sondheim songs. - ] 05:57, 10 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Yes, i'm well aware of that. If there's another article already with the name, disambiguation is not used. But when there's no other article with the name, then there's no point disambiguating. | |||
| :Many of the Desperate Housewives episode articles have this kind of unneeded disambiguation, which is why i'm moving them. | |||
| :(see discussions at ]) --] 06:00, 10 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::They need this kind of disambiguation, which is why I'm adding it back. If the (peculiar) decision has been taken to not provide it in the article title, the reader must at the very least be pointed to the appropriate article treating the pre-existing song after which the episode is named, whether that song has its own article or is covered in the article of the musical in which it appears. - ] 06:03, 10 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::Yes, i know. A header disambiguation template is used for such cases. Disambiguation is only used when there are two existing articles of the same name. It's not actually any new decision. If you take a look at the disambiguation guildlines, and then TV episode naming guildlines at ], you will find that both quite specifically address the issue of when not to use disambiguation - that is, when there are not two articles of the same name. It's been like that for ages. The current discussion was just a decision to actually change series which don't follow the pre-existing guildlines. | |||
| :::For cases as you've outlined, the header disambiguation template can be used. Which i am planning to add in the case of episodes which are after songs. Or you're welcome to do so if you want, you obviously seem more familiar with the area than I. --] 06:08, 10 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::I did take a look. I'll let you do the work; as long as you're willing to clean up after yourself, I won't feel obligated! :) - ] 06:11, 10 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::::Sure, sure. I'm about to fix the links on the episode list article. Double redirects are already fixed. The header disambiguation tags will be added once i'm done with the episode list article. --] 06:15, 10 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| This redirect (a common name of a cornerstone of western literature) is not eligible for deletion. However, I've created a disambig link at ], which should solve the problem. Thanks. ] 06:04, 11 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :If you'd like to open it up for discussion list it at ]. ] 06:07, 11 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Category of deleting redirect pages == | |||
| You wrote: "What ] needs is a speedy tag, under the category of deleting redirect pages so proper (not cut and paste) moves can be made." | |||
| Unfortunately, ] makes this statement from the uncontroversial moves section at ] false: "If there is any doubt as to whether a page move could be opposed by anyone, do not list it in this section." --] 06:25, 11 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Uncontroversial doesn't mean everyone agrees. It just means it's a simple black and white matter, where it's obvious what needs to be done. | |||
| :I assume you're referring to "''if for no other reason than that the term "Smothered" can reasonably be assumed to later be needed for some other article, so disambiguation is appropriate. I would also point out that discussion about the issue of disambiguation is ongoing at Wikipedia_talk:Naming conventions (television), so it is premature to be engaged in page moves at this time. Please do not be disruptive.''" I didn't take that into account at all. The first part of her statement is directly addressed by our guildlines - we don't pre-emptively disambiguate on such assumptions. The second part of her argument is nothing but a misleading statement, consensus at the discussion was already reached and page moves are legitimately underway. | |||
| :Her complaint doesn't make the move contraversial. It's like someone going "opposse, i just don't like it" to a uncontraversial move - it doesn't turn it contraversial. Elonka's complaint isn't much of a step above "i just don't like it". --] 06:34, 11 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Tainted poll?== | |||
| Hi. Sorry to bother you. You participated in a television episode article naming poll which now lives ]. Some feel that wording changes have compromised the results of that poll. If you don't mind, could you please take a look at what is there now and add a quick note at ] to say whether your feelings on the matter remain the same? Of course you can feel free to read over the entirety of both links for more information. Thanks. —] (]) 02:18, 15 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :posting notes on everyone's talk pages huh? haha... seems like a good idea. I think you already know how i feel about this whole "we need a new poll" mess, but i'll go respond anyway. --] 02:26, 15 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::Shocking I need to do this for a poll that finished at a nearly 4-to-1 ratio but whatever... —] (]) 02:37, 15 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Civility== | |||
| Please try not to refer to good faith comments as "immature." | |||
| Could I suggest that mundane editorial disagreements are most likely to resolve quickly and productively when editors observe the following: | |||
| * Remain polite per ]. | |||
| * Solicit feedback and ask questions. | |||
| * Keep the discussion focused. Concentrate on a small set of related matters and resolve them to the satisfaction of all parties. | |||
| * Focus on the subject rather than on the personalities of the editors. | |||
| Thanks!<!-- from Template:Civil0 --> | |||
| Also, may I point out that nearly all of your wiki-time has been spent on moving articles and participating in the Naming Discussions issue. Some of this behavior might possibly be seen as suspicious, since there are concerns of sockpuppetry. May I please encourage you to get involved in other areas of Misplaced Pages as well? Thank you. --] 19:17, 16 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :I'm afraid i simply could not find a more civil way of expressing my opinion towards your words than to just state it. Of course, it may be more poliet to not express my opinions at all, but last time i checked, civility does not equal being "poliet". | |||
| :There is absolutely nothing wrong with sockpupptery. It is only disallowed when it is "''to create the illusion of greater support for an issue, to mislead others, or to circumvent a block''". If you believe i am doing any of those things, then you are welcome to report me in for a sockpuppter investigation. | |||
| :You should, however, check your facts before stating them. Your case will be far more believable when you are not making suggestions such as that my 69 edits and 307 page moves (associated with this disagreement) out of a total of nearly 2878 edits constitute "nearly all of my wiki-time." | |||
| :If you believe throwing around "sockpupptery" accusations like this will scare me into stepping down, you are very wrong. There are few things i personally find more appalling in an online community than experienced members trying to scare off newer members with accusations veiled behind false civility. --] 06:42, 17 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :: Heh, boy, do I know where you're coming from on *that* observation. Makes one wonder if "equal" in Wikipedian means "some are always more equal than others" ] 08:48, 18 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Lost episodes == | |||
| Just an honest mistake. I apologize. --]<sup>]</sup> 07:53, 17 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ... == | |||
| What? <small>] (] <small>•</small> ] <small>•</small> <span class="plainlinks" style="color:#002bb8"></span> <small>•</small> ])</small> 09:02, 18 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Generally most people refer to it as a "]" — You know when a word is incorrect? Some people may refer to it as a spelling mistake, or maybe you might know it as an "incorrect word" — It may help if your signature actually stated your name? <small>] (] <small>•</small> ] <small>•</small> <span class="plainlinks" style="color:#002bb8"></span> <small>•</small> ])</small> 11:44, 18 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Please stop moving articles== | |||
| Yaksha, as you may be aware, there is currently a very active discussion at ] about article naming. This discussion is not concluded, and the guideline itself is clearly labeled as being in dispute. As such, I do not believe that it has been helpful for you to be moving articles, nor to inform editors in other Misplaced Pages projects that the discussion has a clear consensus. Can I please ask you to stop moving articles, until the discussion is concluded? Thanks. --] 08:00, 19 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :sign...this is getting really tiring. No, i'm not planning to stop. Article moving started long ago and is going to continue. The discussion concluded long ago, your own summary proved that. The guildline is not labeled as being in dispute, the ''use'' of the guildline is, but that doesn't mean we ignore it until we sort out our exceptions. | |||
| :As for editors in other wikiprojects, they've agreed to the moving, or they've gone and done the moving themselves, or there has been no response. If this is to do with the lost episode articles, then go take a look at the survey yourself. You and matthew are the only ones who are oppossing. | |||
| :If any other episode article moves is causing contraversy, then i can have then ran through "request moves" as i have done so for the lost articles. --] 08:04, 19 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::And stop assuming other editors are stupid. You can tell them what you want, i can tell them what i want. But at the end, keep in mind they're more than intelligent enough to go take a look at things for themselves. --] 08:05, 19 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Sockpuppetry== | |||
| Well first, no, a checkuser request does not ''have'' to go through RFCU. See ]. Though I guess some time could be saved by simply asking you: What other accounts do you use? --] 02:28, 22 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :hmm...i apologise about my comment regarding the "backchannels" thing. I had simply assumed RFCU was the only place ordinary wikipedians where supposed to go for Checkuser requests. | |||
| :What other accounts i use is of my own concern only. I have no reason, and need not to, disclose them to anyone. --] 02:36, 22 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :: Have any of them been used in any of the naming-related discussions? --] 03:30, 22 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::No. None of them have been involved in anything at all related to TV episodes articles or related discussions. --] 03:37, 22 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::: Then why keep them hidden? If there not being used for malicious purposes why would you have to hide them :-)? <small><font face="Tahoma">'''thanks'''/] ] ]</font></small> 18:07, 22 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::::Maybe you're not watching Elonka's talk page but one of his "socks" is plainly listed on . Now I'll ask that you stop persisting with this inquisition. '''This''' little exchange is turning into a ] violation. File an RFCU (over the table or under the table) or leave him alone. —] (]) 18:18, 22 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::::: No I'm not watching Elonka's talk page, nor am I watching this but thank you for notifying me that operating sock puppets is not beyond him or her I have a pretty good idea of one of his or her sock puppets, thanks anyway. <small><font face="Tahoma">'''thanks'''/] ] ]</font></small> 18:59, 22 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::I'm not even sure what that means. Read ] for the difference between sockpuppets and ''abusive'' sockpuppets. —] (]) 19:10, 22 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Mediation request == | |||
| {{RFM-Request|Misplaced Pages:Naming conventions (television)|Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/Wikipedia:Naming conventions (television)}} —] <small>(] • ])</small> 03:21, 28 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Hunter x Hunter character pages == | |||
| Hello. I'm thinking about renaming the HxH pages, and I noticed you created some of them. Wanna help me come up with the best possible titles? The normal page naming convention would be "List of Hunter x Hunter characters" but that's not going to work here since there's Main, Minor, etc. - ] 21:14, 30 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :back when i created them, i didn't know what the naming conventions are. Or rather, it didn't really occur to me we ''had'' naming conventions. | |||
| :the main/minor characters should be easy. Just follow the convention and have "List of Hunter x Hunter main characters" and "List of Hunter x Hunter minor characters". It's the page with the hunters that i have no idea how to name. It's like, "List of Hunter x Hunter hunters" would be really confusing. I thought of naming it as just "Hunter Association", since the page does have information on the Hunter Association, not just the characters. What do you think? --] 10:00, 2 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::Good points. I'm going to look around at what other pages have done. - ] 17:06, 2 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Stop moving pages== | |||
| Misplaced Pages has '''clear procedures on moving pages'''. Other than in exceptional circumstances all pages should be moved by following the instructions on the ] page. Unilateral moves can trigger edit wars, break links and cause a lot of problems. Please stop unilaterally moving pages{{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|, as you did with ],}} and follow the correct procedure. <!-- Template:MP3 --> --] 19:12, 6 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::Please cease and desist. Continued unilateral action such as this will prevent mediation from being successful. <span style="color:red;font-weight:bold">^</span>]<sup></span>]]</sup> <em style="font-size:10px;">19:43, 6 December 2006 (UTC)</em> | |||
| :::Correct me if I'm wrong, demon, but shouldn't the mediation be formally rejected at this point, with more than one user placing "disagree" on the agreement section? -- ] 21:17, 6 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::: My understanding is that people are allowed to change their minds, up until the deadline. It is probably ^demon's hope (and mine), that everyone will agree to mediation, so that we can find a civil way to proceed. --] 21:40, 6 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Not all page moves have to go through Requested Moves. Even the Requested MOves page itself says that. Stop trying to be misleading Elonka. The page moves started about a month ago, and i don't know how you can call it unilateral. More than half a dozen editors have been helping with moving articles for various TV series after the initial ] got posted, and even outside parties from affected Wikiprojects have ] . So far, i've only filed one Request Move proposal was filed because Lost editors made a big fuss about their articles, and it resulted in a clear consensus for move. | |||
| Mediation is supposed to fix the problem. Stop trying to use the existence of the mediation as an excuse to create an even bigger fuss Elonka. --] 23:54, 6 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 04:56, 20 November 2023
 | This user may have left Misplaced Pages. Yaksha has not edited Misplaced Pages since 11 November 2007. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Misplaced Pages:Requests for adminship/Elonka 2
Thank you for taking the time to participate at the discussion in my Request for Adminship. Unfortunately the nomination did not succeed, but please rest assured that I am still in full support of the Misplaced Pages project. I listened carefully to all concerns, and will do my best to incorporate all of the constructive advice that I received, into my future actions on Misplaced Pages. If you can think of any other ways that I can further improve, please let me know. Best wishes, Elonka 04:08, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Uhhh, I must be missing something...
Can you explain the move to Window of Opportunity? This is a well known term, and it seems extremely unlikely that people looking for the term, or linking to it, would be looking for an episode of a TV show. I read the notes you pointed to in the checkin notes, and the don't really seem to change my mind; this seems pedantic at best. I would like to move it back in order to keep the naming similar to other articles, as well as avoid missed hits on links and searches. Is there any good reason for this policy? Maury 03:09, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
- Yaksha isn't that active these days, so maybe I can help. Article titles are case-sensitive, so the term you speak of exists at Window of opportunity. For more information on the guidelines behind article titles, see WP:NC. -- Ned Scott 07:17, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reply. I should have been more specific, the articles were moved to names without "{Stargate SG-1)" in the title, which struck me as losing information. I'm going to do a move. Maury 13:04, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, I'm really not around these days because of some real life commitments. Thanks for answering here Ned. --`/aksha 11:59, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Correct me if I'm wrong, but...
Weren't we supposed to go with the most popular spellings in terms of Hunter x Hunter characters? "Razor" has way more results in English than "Reiza" in both Google and Yahoo. --Mr. Toto 03:32, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, but "razor" is the name of a knife. "Reiza" is an obscure name of a character in Hunter x Hunter. Of course "razor" would have more results than "Reiza". Even if you searched "razor hunter x hunter" in Google, after a good 50 pages, Google will return search results dealing with razor shavers rather than hxh. --.::Arbitrary::. 11:29, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Hatsu Types.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Hatsu Types.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Misplaced Pages:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:19, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Digimon Wiki
I know the Digimon WikiProject has kind of died off on wikipedia after the transwiki, but we're still going strong at the . I was wondering if you'd like to join over there, so that we can get the old team back together and really make the place something to be proud of. Cheers!Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 04:21, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
Pointer to discussion about TV episode redirects
Hi, Yaksha. It's been a while since the dispute about TV episode article naming. I see you're not active on Misplaced Pages any more, but just in case you're interested I wanted to let you know that there's a new (much smaller, I hope!) discussion about whether to keep the redirects that have "unnecessary" disambiguation or not — one of the byproducts of an early compromise move in that debate. The new discussion is at Misplaced Pages talk:Naming conventions (television)#Redirects, with related discussions at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2008 October 8. Hope to see you there. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 18:33, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
Redirect of Sorting Out the Dirty Laundry (Desperate Housewives special)
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Sorting Out the Dirty Laundry (Desperate Housewives special), by another Misplaced Pages user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Sorting Out the Dirty Laundry (Desperate Housewives special) is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Sorting Out the Dirty Laundry (Desperate Housewives special), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 08:51, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Nen (fiction)
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Nen (fiction). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Misplaced Pages:Notability and "What Misplaced Pages is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Nen (fiction). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:10, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
File:Email in pic.JPG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Email in pic.JPG, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly 23:44, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:Answered - light green.gif or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.
This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:01, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
- Another one of your uploads, File:Answered-dark green.gif, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:04, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
List of Ultimate Digimon listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of Ultimate Digimon. Since you had some involvement with the List of Ultimate Digimon redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 22:57, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
List of Champion Digimon listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of Champion Digimon. Since you had some involvement with the List of Champion Digimon redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 22:57, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
List of Rookie Digimon listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of Rookie Digimon. Since you had some involvement with the List of Rookie Digimon redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 22:58, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
List of Armor Digimon listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of Armor Digimon. Since you had some involvement with the List of Armor Digimon redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 22:58, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
Categories: