| Revision as of 03:11, 7 December 2006 editHkelkar (talk | contribs)7,279 edits →Book← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 16:11, 27 December 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,293,709 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Anti-Hindu sentiment/Archive 1) (bot |
| (883 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{WikiProject Hinduism}} |
|
{{talk header}} |
|
|
{{Contentious topics/talk notice|ipa|long}} |
|
{{oldafdfull|date=14 October 2006}} |
|
|
] |
|
|
Why is the Christian pamhlet "Divali: festival of light, circle of darkness" anti-Hindu? It only illustrates that some Christians consider their religion superior and their emphasis on the ]. ] 20:04, 28 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{Article history |
|
::By the same token, why is the ] pamphlet anti-semitic?It only "illustrates that Nazis considered their race superior". Besides, the source is academic and lists it as anti-Hindu propaganda so that's what it is depicted on wikipedia per the fair use clause.] 20:07, 28 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
| action1 = AFD |
|
:::Most committed adherents of all religions consider their religions superior than other religions. If this were not the case then people would change their religion. This is not the case of people with a certain race. ] 20:15, 28 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
| action1date = 16 October 2006 |
|
:::Please read ]. Besides, Hindus are an ethnicity as well as a religion, and anti-Hindu sentiments involve attacks on both.] 20:18, 28 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
| action1link = Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Log/2006 October 14#Anti-Hindu |
|
::::When, where, and by whom was this pamphlet labelled anti-Hindu? ] 21:03, 28 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
| action1result = kept |
|
::::By the Infinity Foundation.] 21:05, 28 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
| action1oldid = 81708009 |
|
::Bear in mind that Indian Christians (who are far more devout Christians than these Southern Baptist Bible Thumpers) of every moderate denomination celebrate Diwali together with Hindus. I myself an Jewish and celebrate Diwali with Shaivites, Krishnites, Vaishnavites, Ganeshites, Jesuits, Pentacostals, Roman Catholics, Syrian Christians etc. etc.] 20:10, 28 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| action2 = AFD |
|
|
| action2date = 7 March 2014 |
|
|
| action2link = Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Anti-Hinduism |
|
|
| action2result = kept |
|
|
| action2oldid = 598595548 |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|1= |
|
|
{{WikiProject Hinduism|importance=Mid}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Religion|importance=Mid|Interfaith=yes|InterfaithImp=}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Discrimination|importance=mid}} |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|
|archive = Talk:Anti-Hindu sentiment/Archive %(counter)d |
|
|
|algo = old(30d) |
|
|
|counter = 1 |
|
|
|maxarchivesize = 250K |
|
|
|minthreadsleft = 5 |
|
|
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
|
|
|archiveheader = {{aan}}}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Reverts == |
|
This article should be moved to "Anti-Hindu prejudice." "Anti-Hindu" is just an adjective. Also, the I couldn't find any free license on the website the image of the leaflet was taken from. ] <sup>]</sup> 21:00, 28 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
{{U|El C}}, I edit Misplaced Pages occassionally. Please let me know what is wrong with the first paragraph you removed by . The source used does say that. |
|
::Look at the fair use clause in copyright.] 21:01, 28 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:::I can't find the copyright page. ] <sup>]</sup> 21:04, 28 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Fair Use clause is on wikipedia only.] 21:05, 28 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
::::Ah, ok. You previously used GFDL. Fair use is better. ] <sup>]</sup> 21:11, 28 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
::Look at the Afd nom.Consensus was to keep as is. however, if you can get an admin to agree then I will not oppose redirecting to anti-Hindu prejudices.] 21:01, 28 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:::I propose ]. ] 21:05, 28 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
::::Unfortunately the latter term is rarely used. For various historical reasons "anti-Hindu" is more widely used.] 21:06, 28 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::I checked it with google and you are completely correct in this. Nevertheless the title ''anti-Hindu'' contradicts ] It seems that in this case there is good reason not to follow this guideline. ] 21:16, 28 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::Well that's your interpretation. We need consensus here, and also third party mediation. I am not necessarily opposed to moving the article to "anti-Hindu prejudices".] 21:26, 28 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::Is it possible to interpret "It is recommended that adjectives be redirected to nouns" any other way? ] <sup>]</sup> 21:54, 28 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::Keep article at same title.] <font color = "blue"><sub>]</sub></font> 21:52, 28 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Semi-protected edit request on 15 May 2021 == |
|
I asked a question at the ] regarding the name ] 22:23, 4 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
Please change X (no info) to "Several thousand supporters of Hefazat-e-Islam’s leader Mamunul Haque in Bangladesh attacked a Hindu village in March 2021, which resulted in the ransacking and looting of many houses and the vandalization of 70-80 houses."<ref>{{cite web | title = Extremist Islamist group's supporters attack 70-80 Hindu houses in Bangladesh: Police | url = https://www.indiatoday.in/world/asia/story/extremist-islamist-group-supporters-attack-hindu-houses-bangladesh-1781394-2021-03-20 | date = 20 March 2021 | publisher = India Today}}</ref> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{ref-talk}} |
|
== edit warring == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Semi-protected edit request on 26 November 2024 == |
|
I explained the reasons for my edit, but ] without comment. Please discuss issues rather than edit warring. — ] ] 22:00, 10 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
{{edit semi-protected|Anti-Hindu sentiment|answered=yes}} |
|
|
Can this be added in the examples section: The police took a group photo on the sacred steps of the Sabarimala with no respect for the traditions and the ADGP ordered a probe.<ref>https://www.indiatoday.in/india/kerala/story/police-group-photo-sabarimala-sacred-steps-pathinettampadi-controversy-adgp-orders-probe-2640492-2024-11-26</ref>-] (]) 13:34, 26 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:{{re|Toddy1}} please respond to this also-] (]) 13:00, 27 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:If you read the sources you cited, they are far more nuanced than the text you proposed. For example, the source you cited mentions that {{tq| standing with their backs to the ‘sanctum sanctorum’ was viewed as a serious breach of tradition.}} However, you are using terms like ''''no respect.'''' " Misplaced Pages articles are expected to be written from a ], which your proposed text fails to comply with. Additionally, the ADGP ordered an '''inquiry,''' not a probe. ] (]) 08:28, 3 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
{{rlt}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Semi-protected edit request on 30 November 2024 == |
|
:Maybe because the actual thing was cited in the source. {{cquote|Our US Congressman, who is a member of the India Caucus and will be part of the Congressional delegation visiting India in early January, spent considerable time with me today specifically on the Ramayana portrayal by Professor Susan Wadley. The Congressman said that he was appalled at the inflammatory approach in the Ramayana material, and was especially concerned that it was done under Federal grant money as that could give it the aura of governmental stamp of approval}} ] <font color = "blue"><sub>]</sub></font> 22:02, 10 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{edit semi-protected|Anti-Hindu sentiment|answered=yes}} |
|
::I have corrected the text to reflect what is claimed in your selectively-quoted source. — ] ] 22:08, 10 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
Please add this in the Bangladesh section: Hindus are fleeing Bangladesh localities due to being attacked and vandalism of temples.<ref name="f524">{{cite web | last=Mishra | first=Ashutosh | title=Hindus flee Bangladesh locality after temples attacked, cops turn blind eye | website=India Today | date=2024-11-29 | url=https://www.indiatoday.in/world/story/bangladesh-temples-attacked-chittagong-hindus-flee-locality-2642353-2024-11-29 | access-date=2024-11-30}}</ref><ref name="i638">{{cite | title=Three Hindu temples in Bangladesh's Chattogram vandalised | date=2024-11-29 | issn=0013-0389 | url=https://economictimes.com/news/international/world-news/three-hindu-temples-in-bangladeshs-chattogram-vandalised/articleshow/115818148.cms | access-date=2024-11-30}}</ref> ] (]) 08:26, 30 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:::Its not even my source. I have no idea who quoted it. The only reason I came to this article at this point in time was because it was on my watchlist. Its only edit warring once a person reverts twice.] <font color = "blue"><sub>]</sub></font> 01:26, 11 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
:{{not done}}:<!-- Template:ESp --> These sources have a lot of information that deserve to be in the article, what you have suggested reduces this significantly. I think more information from the sources should be included. ] (]) 11:52, 26 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Semi-protected edit request on 8 December 2024 == |
|
::::Whatever. You reverted wrongly, and without an edit summary, after I had explained the reasons for my edit in detail. — ] ] 02:13, 11 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{edit semi-protected|Anti-Hindu sentiment|answered=yes}} |
|
==Genocide?== |
|
|
|
Please add this to the Bangladesh section: Another temple burnt in Bangladesh-Hindus attacked citing this reference https://www.indiatoday.in/world/story/attack-on-iskcon-centre-burnt-in-bangladesh-hindus-attacked-muhammed-yunus-2646443-2024-12-07 ] (]) 10:36, 8 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
I know little of the issues of Hindus in Southeast Asia, but I doubt that something with as specific a definition as ] would describe their experience. Specifically I've never encountered mention of anti-Hindu massacres as examples of genocide. Indeed, even Wikipedias list of things described as genocide, which is far broader one I'd write to do what is my rather simple understanding of 'the murder of a people.' Perhaps a less specific term like massacre, persuecution or ethnic cleansing might be appropriate? |
|
|
] 00:46, 6 December 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
::Plz see ]. ] 01:00, 6 December 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:::I changed it to more specific examples with the less specific description "persecution".] 01:04, 6 December 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:{{not done}}:<!-- Template:ESp --> This needs more information to be included. ] (]) 11:53, 26 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
==Book== |
|
|
* <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (]) 02:56, 7 December 2006 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned --> |
|
|
::A better source is needed. Hindu Unity is a "hate site" and is not appropriate or reliable here. ] 03:11, 7 December 2006 (UTC) |
|
Please change X (no info) to "Several thousand supporters of Hefazat-e-Islam’s leader Mamunul Haque in Bangladesh attacked a Hindu village in March 2021, which resulted in the ransacking and looting of many houses and the vandalization of 70-80 houses."
Can this be added in the examples section: The police took a group photo on the sacred steps of the Sabarimala with no respect for the traditions and the ADGP ordered a probe.-AlBaluchi1 (talk) 13:34, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Not done: These sources have a lot of information that deserve to be in the article, what you have suggested reduces this significantly. I think more information from the sources should be included. Ultraodan (talk) 11:52, 26 December 2024 (UTC)