Misplaced Pages

Anti-Hindu sentiment: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:15, 7 December 2006 view sourceHkelkar (talk | contribs)7,279 edits →See also: Better sources for Talib book← Previous edit Latest revision as of 07:50, 27 December 2024 view source Ratnahastin (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers16,218 edits →India: no where does the source categorise his remarks as being anti hindu. 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|none}} <!-- "none" is preferred when the title is sufficiently descriptive; see ] -->
]
{{About|hatred of, or prejudice towards Hindus|religious persecution of Hindus|Persecution of Hindus}}
'''Anti-Hindu''' prejudice is a negative perception against ], Hindus and Indian or Hindu culture. Such prejudice is a form of ]. While stereotyping of Hindus in the west has decreased somewhat as a result of social, academic and financial success of the Hindus, it is possible to cultivate a negative perception of Hinduism by carefully portraying Hinduism as evil. Western stereotypes of Hinduism do exist in academia and society<ref></ref>, and hate-crimes against Hindus have risen in some European countries.
{{pp|small=yes}}

{{Multiple issues|
Because Hinduism tends to naturally accepting of non-Hindu philosophies and practices, it can be hard to arise passions against Hinduism. However it has been possible to persuade tribals and poor communities in India that their problems are due to evils inherent in Hinduism.
{{Cleanup reorganize|date=July 2021}}

{{Lead too short|date=January 2022}}
There are several group within India and many working in western countries that are specifically anti-Hindu. In addition, anti-Hindu sentiments have been expressed by fundamentalist Muslims in ], ], and by Fundamentalist Christian regimes in ], leading to significant ] in those regions, such as the ] by Pakistan, and the recent ] in Malaysia.

==Anti-Hindu stereotypes==
{{Hinduism small}}
Many anti-Hindu personalities, organizations, and even several academics in India, as well as in western countries often use the "Caste, Cows and Curry" stereotype against Hindus <ref></ref> <ref name="uchicago">, ''Uchicago.edu''</ref>, deliberately ridiculing Hindu beliefs as incompatible with the predominant beliefs of some Abrahamic Religions <ref name="uchicago"/>. Historically, such stereotypes were promulgated during the ] by several ] in South Asia as a means to aggrandize sectarian divisions in Indian society, part of the ] strategy employed by the British.

The ], a social stratification system in South Asia which has been criticized for it's discriminatory problems, is uniquely blamed on Hindus and the religion of ]. This is a common stereotype, as adherents of other religions such as ] and ] also practice Caste segregations in India (for details, see ]) and is generally regarded in India as a social issue, rather than a religious one. Anti-Hindu polemicists often deliberately muddle or confuse this distinction in order to defame and denigrate the Hindu people. Several organizations in India and abroad have been criticized by Hindu advocacy groups for these types of attacks.

The devotion to bovine animals (regarded as holy in Hinduism) is also used as a pretext to mock the Hindu people by many in the west. In addition, the Hindu tradition of cremating their dead is used to mock the people.

Anti-Hindu attacks often accuse Hindus of being "Blasphemers" for committing "idolatry" and "polytheism" (] is more accurately described as ] than polytheistic). Some Anti-Hindus have a mistaken interpretation of Hinduism, relating it more to Ancient polytheistic religions as opposed to one that relates to enlightenment or ]. This accusation is prevalent among adherents of monotheistic religions like ] and ]. Many Christian missionaries, particularly those of ], denigrate Hindu deities as "evil" or "demonic". Many advocacy groups in the west, such as the ] and the ] have spoken against anti-Hindu bigotry and prejudice.

==Historical instances of anti-Hindu views==
''See Also:'']
===During Islamic Rule in the Indian Subcontinent===
India has historically been subject to Islamic rule from the period of ] to the ] and the ], as well as smaller kingdoms like the ] and ]s kingdom of Mysore. In almost all of those regimes, Hindus have had an inherently inferior status to the Muslim overlords. Hindus were first awarded the status of the "people of the book" (''ahl-al-kitab'') under bin-Qasim.Islamic law demands that when under Muslim rule "polytheists" or "infidels" be treated as ] (from the Arab term) ''ahl-al-dhimma''<ref>Nicholas F. Gier, FROM MONGOLS TO MUGHALS: RELIGIOUS VIOLENCE IN INDIA 9TH-18TH CENTURIES, Presented at the Pacific Northwest Regional Meeting American Academy of Religion, Gonzaga University, May, 2006</ref>.The writer ] introduced the modern word ''Dhimmitude'' as a generic indication of this Islamic attitude. Dhimmis were granted "protection" of life, the right to residence in designated areas, worship, and work or trade, and exemption from Muslim religious duties, personal law and tax on certain conditions such as paying the poll (]) and land taxes as set by Muslim authorities (and mandated by ]s and ]s). At the same time they were subject to various restrictions in relation to Muslims and Islam.

It can be argued that while, in theory, the idea of dhimmitude was anti-Hindu, in practice, the Muslim rulers were more pragmatic and did not wish to disparage or oppress educated , literate and often industrious Hindus who could be used in their service. Muslim conquerors such as ] was believed to develop more liberal attitudes to towards Hindus as his regime developed over time.Also, the Muslim Emperor ], had a Hindu prime minister ] in his employ, whom he regarded very highly.Akbar was well-known to exhibit religious tolerance and pluralism during his reign.In addition, Muslim rulers such as ], had Hindus in his employ as well.

During the Muslim conquest of South Asia, Muslim scholars would often chronicle the conquests of Hindu regions, the desecration of Hindu temples and the massacres of Hindu populations with gusto and glee. Works such as the ''Chach-Nama'', ''Baburnama'', ''Tarikh-i-Yamini'',''Tarikh-i-Feroze-Shahi'' and others describe how "polytheists" were "rightly killed" and honor bestowed upon Muslims and Islam. It can be argued that some degree of poetic liscense should be taken into account in these writings.

Several Islamic scholars, theologians and Emperors held virulently anti-Hindu stances during the ]. They regarded Hindus as "infidels" who had to be slaughtered with no mercy. In particular, the Arab invaders in the 8th century held anti-Hindu attitudes, such as the testament of the superior of ], Hajjaj, who quoted the ] to justify the slaughter of Hindus<ref>
{{cite book
| last = Trifkovic
| first = Serge
| authorlink = Serge Trifkovic
| title = The Sword of the Prophet: History, Theology, Impact on the World
| publisher = Regina Orthodox Press
| date = Sept. 11, 2002
}}
</ref>.

====Barrani====
Under the reign of ], the Muslim cleric ] wrote several works, such as the ''Fatwa-i-Jahandari'', which contained disparaging statements against Hindus. Barrani has been described as a "fanatical protagonist of ]"<ref name="Das">Das, Arbind, Arthashastra of Kautilya and Fatwa-i-Jahandari of Ziauddin Barrani:an analysis, Pratibha Publications, Delhi 1996, ISBN:81-85268-45-2 pgs 138-139</ref> and wrote that there should be "an all-out struggle against Hinduism", advocating a militant and dogmatic religiosity<ref name="Verma">Verma, V.P, Ancient and Medieval Indian Political Thought, Lakshmi Narasan Aggarwal Educational Publications, Agra 1986 pgs218-220</ref>. He developed a system of religious elitism to that effect<ref name="Verma"/>.

====Babur====
The first ruler of the Islamic ], Zahiruddin Muhammad ] expressed anti-Hindu views in the ]:

{{cquote|Hindustan is a place of little charm. There is no beauty in its people, no graceful social intercourse, no poetic talent or understanding, no etiquette, nobility or manliness. The arts and crafts have no harmony or symmetry. There are no good horses, meat, grapes, melons or other fruit. There is no ice, cold water, good food or bread in the markets. There are no baths and no madrasas. There are no candles, torches or candlesticks.<ref>{{cite book
| last = Thackston
| first = Wheeler
| authorlink = Wheeler M. Thackston
| title = The Baburnama (p352)
| publisher =
| date = 2002
}}</ref>
}} }}
{{EngvarB|date=July 2016}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=July 2016}}
{{Status of religious freedom |expanded=persecution}}
{{Discrimination sidebar |expanded=Religious}}
{{Hinduism |society}}


'''Anti-Hindu sentiment''', sometimes also referred to as '''Hinduphobia''', is a negative perception, sentiment or ] the practitioners or religion of ]. It exists in many contexts in many countries, often due to historical conflict. There is also scholarly debate on what constitutes Hinduphobia in the ].
The comments made by the Emperor Babur, echo in the slighest terms the disparaging and often hateful opinion that some of the Mughals had towards Hindustan and in particular Hindus.

====Aurangzeb====
The Mughal emperor ] was known to be a fanatical anti-Hindu and destroyed many Hindu temples and other places of worship, as well as the genocide of hundreds of thousands of Hindus.Aurangzeb adopted various measures to promote Islam in its wholesome moral standards. In many instances he even undertook demolition of Hindu temples in his effort to subdue influence o f the Hindu religion. He issued regulations and imposed religious taxes to prevent the progress of his rival religion. The imposition of Jizya on the Hindus in 1679 which was an anti Hindu policy resulted in the rise of the Rajput in a revolt in 1769. This struggle continued till 1681 when Aurangzeb made peace with the Rajputs.The other sect affected by the Anti-hindu policy of Aurangzeb were the Satnamis. Their revolt was crushed by Aurangzeb. Next was the revolt of the Jats of Mathura which was an opposition to the policy and oppression under Aurangzeb. Though they were suppressed in the early period they carried on the struggle till the death of Aurangzeb<ref></ref>.

====Tipu Sultan====
The attitudes of Muslim ruler ] is a source of some debate. While some historians claim that he had an egalitarian attitude towards Hindus and was harsh towards them only when politically expedient<ref>Kate Brittlebank ''Tipu Sultan’s Search for Legitimacy: Islam and Kingship in a Hindu domain'' (Delhi: Oxford University Press) 1997</ref>, others, including British scholars of the period, noted a systematic hatred of Hindus in Tipu. In the first part of his reign in particular he appears to have been notably more aggressive and religiously doctrinaire than his father, ]. <ref>Lewin Bowring ''Haidar Ali and Tipu Sultan and the struggle with the Musalman powers of the south'' (Oxford: Clarendon Press) 1893 </ref> There are several historians<ref name=rpersecutor1>{{cite book
| last = Valath
| first = V. V. K.
| authorlink =
| coauthors =
| editor =
| others =
| title = Keralathile Sthacharithrangal - Thrissur Jilla
| origdate =
| origyear =
| origmonth =
| url =
| format =
| accessdate =
| accessyear = 2006
| accessmonth =
| edition =
| date =
| year = 1981
| month =
| publisher = Kerala Sahithya Academy
| location =
| language = Malayalam
| id =
| doi =
| pages = 74-79
| chapter =
| chapterurl =
| quote =
}}</ref> who claim that Tippu Sultan was a religious persecutor of Hindus. In 1780 CE he declared himself to be the '']'' or Emperor of Mysore, and struck coinage in his own name without reference to the reigning Mughal Emperor Shah Alam II. H. D. Sharma writes that in his correspondence with other Islamic rulers such as Shah Zaman of ], Tippu Sultan used this title and declared that he intended to establish an Islamic Empire in the entire country, along the lines of the ] which was at its nadir during the period in question. <ref name="Realtipu">{{cite book
| last = Sharma
| first = H.D
| authorlink = H.D Sharma
| title = The Real Tipu
| date = January 16, 1991
| year =1991
| month = January
| publisher = Rishi Publications, Varanasi
| language = English
}}</ref>. His alliance with the French was supposedly aimed at achieving this goal by driving his main rivals, the British, out of the subcontinent.

In addition, H.D. Sharma points out that, contrary to the claims of other scholars such as Mohibbul Hasan, he did not carry out the conversions as a punitive measure for rebellion, but as part of a campaign to eradicate Hinduism from his kingdom<ref name="Realtipu"/>. In addition, he cites examples such as Tippu's conquest of Malabar in 1788 CE, when he appointed a "Shaikh ul-Islam" in each village to carry out forced conversions in an organized manner. This was primarily done to the well-educated ] Hindus in the region, including those in Coorg, as Tippu perceived their intellect to be a threat to his Islamic rule<ref name="Realtipu"/>. C. K. Kareem also notes that Tippu Sultan issued an edict for the destruction of Hindu temples in ]. <ref name="rpersecutor5">{{cite book
| last = Kareem
| first = C.K
| authorlink =
| coauthors =
| editor =
| others =
| title = Kerala Under Haidar Ali and Tipu Sultan P187
| origdate =
| origyear = 1973
| origmonth =
| url =
| format =
| accessdate =
| accessyear =
| accessmonth =
| edition =
| date =
| year = 1973
| month =
| publisher = Kerala History Association : distributors, Paico Pub. House
| location =
| language =
| id =
| doi =
| pages = 322
| chapter =
| chapterurl =
| quote =
}}</ref>.

Historians such as Sharma cites letters that Tippu wrote to the ] Sultan in 1792 CE as proof of his claims of Tippu's religious persecution. In the letters Tippu expressed his disdain for Hindus as "polytheists" and "infidels", as well as his intent to Islamize his territories<ref name="Realtipu"/>.Sharma further states that Tippu's disdain for Hindus manifested in the fact that he ranked his army according to Muslim Castes, with the Arab-descended ''Ashraf'' castes at the top ranks, the converted "Ajlaf" castes at the middle ranks, and Hindus at the lowest rank. Mir Hussain Ali Khan Kirmani wrote in his ''Neshan-e Haidari'' that Tippu "developed a great aversion to Brahmins, Hindus and other tribes and he did not consider any but the people of Islam to be his friends, and, therefore, on all accounts, his chief object was to promote and provide for them. At this time he tried to eliminate Hindu worship from his territory. He confiscated funds from the temples being intended to balance the loss of revenue derived so far from intoxicating substances, the production of which he has banned earlier." Tippu also changed the names of towns from Dravidian names to Urdu ones. He destroyed Calicut because it was named after ], then depopulated the surrounding areas to repopulate the renamed town of "Ferozabad". The Hindus "returned jubilant" when the town was liberated<ref name="Realtipu"/>.


]
Historian Hayavadana C. Rao wrote about Tippu in his encyclopaedic work on the History of Mysore. He asserted that Tippu's "religious fanaticism and the excesses committed in the name of religion, both in Mysore and in the provinces, stand condemned for all time. His bigotry, indeed, was so great that it precluded all ideas of toleration". He further asserts that the acts of Tippu that were constructive towards Hindus were largely political and ostentatious rather than an indication of genuine tolerance<ref name="Rao">{{cite book
| last = Rao
| first = Hayavadana C.
| authorlink = Hayavadana C. Rao
| title = History of Mysore 1399-1799: Incorporating the latest Epigraphical, Literary and Historical Researches Vol. 3 pgs 1047-53
| publisher = Bangalore Government Press
}}</ref>.


==Definitions==
Whilst no scholar has denied that, in common with most rulers of his period, Tippu’s campaigns were often characterised by great brutality, some historians claim that this was not exclusively religiously motivated, and did not amount to a consistent anti-Hindu policy. Brittlebank, Hasan, Chetty, Habib and Saletare amongst others argue that stories of Tippu's religious persecution of Hindus and Christians are largely derived from the work of early British authors such as Kirkpatrick <ref>W. Kirkpatrick ''Select Letters of Tippoo Sultan'' (London) 1811</ref> and Wilks <ref>M. Wilks ''Report on the Interior Administration, Resources and Expenditure of the Government of Mysore under the System prescribed by the Order of the Governor-General in Council dated 4th September 1799'' (Bangalore) 1864 & ''Historical Sketches of the South of India in an Attempt to Trace the History of Mysore'' Ed. M. Hammick (Mysore) 1930 2 Vols.</ref>, whom they do not consider to be entirely reliable.<ref>C.C. Davies "Review of ''The History of Tipu Sultan'' by Mohibbul Hasan" in ''The English Historical Review'' Vol.68 №.266 (Jan, 1953) pp144-5</ref> A. S. Chetty argues that Wilks’ account in particular cannot be trusted. <ref>A. Subbaraya Chetty “Tipu’s endowments to Hindus and Hindu institutions” in Habib (Ed.) ''Confronting Colonialism'' p111 </ref> ] and Mohibbul Hasan argue that these early British authors had a strong vested interest in presenting Tippu Sultan as a tyrant from whom the British had "liberated" Mysore.<ref>Irfan Habib "War and Peace. Tippu Sultan's Account of the last Phase of the Second War with the English, 1783-4" ''State and Diplomacy Under Tipu Sultan'' (Delhi) 2001 p5; Mohibbul Hasan writes "The reasons why Tipu was reviled are not far to seek. Englishmen were prejudiced against him because they regarded him as their most formidable rival and an inveterate enemy, and because, unlike other Indian rulers, he refused to become a tributary of the English Company. Many of the atrocities of which he was been accused were allegedly fabricated either by persons embittered and angry on account of the defeats which they had sustained at his hands, or by the prisoners of war who had suffered punishments which they thought they did not deserve. He was also misrepresented by those who were anxious to justify the wars of aggression which the Company's Government had waged against him. Moreover, his achievements were belittled and his character blackened in order that the people of Mysore might forget him and rally round the Raja, thus helping in the consolidation of the new regime" ''The History of Tipu Sultan'' (Delhi) 1971 p368</ref>. This assessment is echoed by Brittlebank in her recent work <ref> Brittlebank ''Tipu Sultan’s search for legitimacy'' p10-12. On p2 she writes “it is perhaps ironic that the aggressive Hinduism of some members of the Indian Community in the 1990s should draw upon an image of Tipu which, as we shall see, was initially constructed by the Subcontinent’s colonisers.” </ref>
Scholar ] defines the term "Hinduphobia" as an irrational aversion of ] or ].<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal|last=Long|first=Jeffery D.|date=December 2017|title=Reflections on Hinduphobia: A Perspective from a Scholar-Practitioner|url=https://www.esamskriti.com/essays/pdf/17%20Reflections%20on%20Hinduphobia%20PDF.pdf|journal=]|volume=122|pages=797–804}}</ref> ], a Professor of Media Studies at the ] agrees.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Juluri|first=Vamsee|title=Ethics, Ethnocentrism and Social Science Research|publisher=Routledge|year=2020|isbn=9780429270260|editor-last=Sharma|editor-first=Divya|chapter="Hindu nationalism" or "Hinduphobia"? : Ethnocentrism, errors, and bias in media and media studies|doi=10.4324/9780429270260-8|s2cid=226346622|chapter-url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780429270260-8/hindu-nationalism-hinduphobia-vamsee-juluri}}</ref>{{Efn|In a discourse on the related issue of ], Chinnaiah Jangam (Professor of South Asian History at ]) had noted that Juluri did not have any academic training in history, swore by ], and even wrote a book in defense of militant Hindu nationalism.<ref>{{Cite journal|date=2015-06-05|title=What Is at Stake in Rewriting California School Textbooks?|url=https://www.epw.in/journal/2016/29/commentary/what-stake-rewriting-california-school-textbooks.html|journal=]|last=Jangam|first=Chinnaiah|language=en|volume=51|issue=29|pages=7–8}}</ref> Juluri rejected the charges.<ref>{{Cite journal|date=2015-06-05|title=California Textbooks Issue: A Response|url=https://www.epw.in/journal/2016/31/web-exclusives/california-textbooks-issue-response.html|journal=Economic and Political Weekly|last=Juluri|first=Vamsee|language=en|pages=7–8}}</ref>}}


== Examples of anti-Hindu sentiments ==
===During the Christian Invasion of Goa===
According to the religious dialogue activist ], some ] denigrate ] and consider Hindu rituals barbaric, and such attitudes have caused tensions between religious communities.<ref name=":3">{{Cite web|url=http://www.thehindu.com/2001/10/09/stories/13090244.htm|website=]|title=Who's afraid of dialogue?|date=2001-10-09|access-date=2017-06-02}}{{dead link|date=April 2021|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=DoFxBgAAQBAJ&pg=PT125|title=Pentecostals, Proselytization, and Anti-Christian Violence in Contemporary India|last=Bauman|first=Chad M.|date=2015-02-02|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=9780190266318|pages=125|language=en}}</ref>
During the ], thousands of Goanese Hindus were massacred by Christian ], starting from the year 1560. The inquisition was proposed by ], who held the anti-Hindu view that Hindu temples and places of worship had to be destroyed <ref>{{cite book
| last = Rao
| first = R.P
| authorlink = R.P Rao
| title = Portuguese Rule in Goa:1510-1961 P43
| publisher = Asia Publishing House
| date = 1963
}}
</ref>.
===During the British Raj===
During the ] of the Indian Subcontinent, several evangelical Christian missionaries spread anti-Hindu propaganda in India during the 19th century. In particular, journalist and writer ] was known for his intensely disparaging views against Hinduism. The same was true for several Englishmen such as Macauley, whose anti-Hindu views created a negationist social mindset in India that prevails to this day.


], a leader of the ] party in ], has been charged several times for hate speeches denigrating Hindu gods and inciting violence against Hindus.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/09/world/asia/indian-muslims-lose-hope-in-national-secular-party.html|title=Indian Muslims Lose Hope in National Secular Party|last=Bagri|first=Neha Thirani|date=2014-11-08|work=The New York Times|access-date=2017-06-07|language=en-US|issn=0362-4331}}</ref><ref name="bbc08jan2013">{{cite news | date=8 January 2013 | url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-20942476 | work=] | title=Politician Akbaruddin Owaisi held over 'hate speeches' | access-date=8 January 2013}}</ref>
In ] highly influential "Observations on the ...Asiatic subjects of Great Britain" (1796),<ref>Grant, Charles. (1796) Observations on the state of society among the Asiatic subjects of Great Britain, particularly with respect to morals; and on the means of improving it, written chiefly in the year 1792.</ref> Grant criticized the Orientalists for being too respectful to Indian culture and religion. His work tried to determine the Hindu's "true place in the moral scale", and he alleged that the Hindus are "a people exceedingly depraved".
A ] preacher apologised for insulting Hinduism in 2014, after an uproar.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://m.deccanherald.com/articles.php?name=http://www.deccanherald.com/content/422879/muslim-preacher-apologises-insulting-hinduism.html|title=Muslim preacher apologises for insulting Hinduism|date=31 July 2014|work=Deccan Herald|access-date=2017-06-20|language=en-UK}}{{Dead link|date=September 2019 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref>
Hindus have historically been, and continue to be, considered ] by some Muslims<ref name=HMP>{{cite journal |last=Engineer |first=Ashghar Ali |date=13–19 February 1999 |title=Hindu-Muslim Problem: An Approach |journal=Economic and Political Weekly |volume=37 |issue=7 |page=397 |jstor=4407649}}</ref> and ], ] or ]ic by some ].<ref>{{Cite book|last=Altman|first=Michael|title=Heathen, Hindoo, Hindu: American Representations of India, 1721-1893|year=2017|publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=9780190654924}}</ref>


== Asia ==
], who introduced English education into India, claimed: "I have never found one among them who could deny that a single shelf of a good European library was worth the whole native literature of ] and ]." <ref> A Tribute to Hinduism</ref> He wrote that Arabic and Sanskrit works on medecine contain "medical doctrines which would disgrace an English Farrier - Astronomy, which would move laughter in girls at an English boarding school - History, abounding with kings thirty feet high, and reigns thirty thousand years long - and Geography made up of seas of treacle and seas of butter".<ref name="Macaulay">Macaulay, Thomas Babington, 1835:242-243, Minute on Indian education.</ref> He advocated to create a middle Anglicised class that was "Indian in blood and colour, but English in taste, in opinions, in morals, and in intellect"<ref name="Macaulay"/>. This class of anglicized Indians would then in turn anglicize the Indian people.


=== Afghanistan ===
One of the most influential historians of India during the British Empire, ] was criticized for being prejudiced against Hindus. His work "History of British India" (1817) may be the "single most important source of British Indophobia and hostility to Orientalism".<ref>Trautmann 1997:117</ref> The Indologist H.H. Wilson wrote that the tendency of Mill's work is "evil".<ref>H.H. Wilson 1858 in James Mill 1858, The history of British India, Preface of the editor</ref> Mill claimed that both Indians and Chinese people are cowardly, unfeeling and mendacious. Both Mill and Grant attacked Orientalist scholarship that was too respectful of Indian culture: "It was unfortunate that a mind so pure, so warm in the pursuit of truth, and so devoted to oriental learning, as that of Sir ], should have adopted the hypothesis of a high state of civilization in the principal countries of Asia"<ref>Mill, James - 1858, 2:109, The history of British India</ref>. ]'s writings were also prejudiced against Indians<ref name="Marx">{{cite journal | author=Suniti Kumar Ghosh | title=Marx on India | journal=Monthly Review | year=1984}}</ref>.
{{See also|Hinduism in Afghanistan}}
Religious persecution, discrimination of Hindus has caused ] to dwindle.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Kumar |first=Ruchi |title=The decline of Afghanistan's Hindu and Sikh communities |url=https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2016/12/decline-afghanistan-hindu-sikh-communities-161225082540860.html |access-date=2020-05-01 |website=aljazeera.com}}</ref> Sikhs and Hindus are continuing to flee from Afghanistan as of July 2020.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Bagchi |first=Joymala |title=Sikh Afghan Nationals Narrate Their Stories Of Fear, Suppression And Anxiety Faced In Kabul |url=http://www.businessworld.in/article/Sikh-Afghan-nationals-narrate-their-stories-of-fear-suppression-and-anxiety-faced-in-Kabul/26-07-2020-301687/ |access-date=2020-07-27 |website=businessworld.in}}</ref>


The ] government in ], which enforced strict ] (Islamic law), announced plans to require all Hindus (and ]) to wear identifying badges in public in May 2001 as part of the Taliban's campaign to ] and repress "un-Islamic and idolatrous segments" of ].<ref name="TalibantoMark">, CNN (22 May 2001).</ref><ref name="PBS">, '']'', PBS (22 May 2001).</ref> At the time, about 500 Hindus and 2,000 Sikhs remained in Afghanistan.<ref name="Harding">Luke Harding, , ''The Guardian'' (23 May 2001).</ref> The anti-Hindu decree was seen by many as being reminiscent of the ] law which required all ] to wear identifying ]s.<ref name="PBS"/><ref name="Kelley">Jack Kelley, , ''USA Today'' (22 May 2001).</ref><ref name="wired.com">] (22 May 2001). '']''. Retrieved 19 November 2020.</ref> The order prompted international outrage, and it was denounced by the ] and ],<ref name="Harding"/> as well as by ] of the ].<ref name="Kelley"/> Following international pressure, the ] dropped the badge plans in June 2001.<ref>, ] (27 June 2001).</ref>
==Contemporary instances of Anti-Hindu views==
===In the West===
Elements in the Western Academia have also been criticized for defaming and denigrating Hinduism with the purpose of a political agenda to meant to segregate and marginalize the growing Hindu communities in the west, in much the same way that ] has evolved in the same part of the world. Cases of alleged slander and racist libel against Hindus such as those of ] and ] have achieved relative prominence in recent years. Several journalists in the West, such as Celia Dugger <ref>, ''rediff.com''</ref> of the New York Times and others such as Barbara Crosett and Molly Moore are regarded as anti-Hindu <ref>, ''rediff.com''</ref>. In addition, writer Francois Gautier comments that "There is an unconscious militant dislike of the Christian world towards Hindu India".


====Academia==== === Bangladesh ===
{{See also|Persecution_of_Hindus#Bangladesh|l1=Persecution of Hindus in Bangladesh}}
Claims of Bias against Hindus in South Asian Studies have often been made. Such real or perceived bias can imply old-fashioned and prejudiced outsider interpretations of Eastern cultures and peoples:
In ] political leaders frequently face controversy for spreading anti-Hindu sentiment in an attempt to appeal to religious extremists and incite community outrage.<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070429013645/http://in.rediff.com/cms/print.jsp?docpath=%2Fnews%2F2005%2Faug%2F13guest1.htm|date=29 April 2007}}</ref> One of the most well known instances of this occurred in 1996 when ] a previous ], and then leader of the opposition, declared that the country was at risk of hearing "]" (a ] custom involving women's ]) from ]s, replacing the ] (Muslim call to prayer).<ref>{{cite book|publisher=Agence-France Press|title=Bangladesh opposition leader accused of hurting religious sentiment |date=18 November 1996}}</ref>


The fundamentalists and right-wing parties such as the ] and ] often portray Hindus as being sympathetic to India, making accusations of ] and allegations of transferring economic resources to India, contributing to a widespread perception that Bangladeshi Hindus are disloyal to the state. Also, the right wing parties claim the Hindus to be backing the Awami League.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://web.amnesty.org/library/Index/engASA130062001!Open|title=Amnesty International Report|access-date=21 September 2006|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061018043738/http://web.amnesty.org/library/Index/engASA130062001!Open|archive-date=18 October 2006|url-status=dead}}</ref>
*Biased interpretation of Indian history. For example James Mill's History of India downplays Indian history.<ref>Mill 1858</ref>.
*One-sided, unfair, exaggerated or exclusively negative presentation of some aspects of Hinduism or Indian culture. For example exaggerations or misrepresentations about Hindu theology, misrepresentations about the status of women in Hinduism, etc.
*Claims that the Indological scholarship of Indians themselves is not scientific or that it is motivated by political motives, i.e. by Marxist, nationalist, Hindu, Muslim, Dravidian separatist or other motives.
*Claims that India has not produced any worthwhile literature<ref name="Macaulay"/>.
*Pervasive influence of racialist ideas in western scholarship of Indian society .


On 28 February 2013, the ] sentenced ], the Vice President of the ] to death for the war crimes committed during the ]. Following the sentence, Jamaat-e-Islami activists attacked Hindu communities across the country. Hindu properties were looted and burned down, and temples were desecrated and set on fire.<ref>{{cite web |last=Habib |first=Haroon |title=44 killed in Bangladesh violence |website=The Hindu |date=2013-03-01 |url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/international/south-asia/44-killed-in-bangladesh-violence/article4465210.ece |access-date=2024-10-17}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Bagerhat Hindu Temple Set on Fire |url=http://dev-bd.bdnews24.com/details.php?id=241410&cid=2 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20130407194310/http://dev-bd.bdnews24.com/details.php?id=241410&cid=2 |url-status=dead |archive-date=7 April 2013 |access-date=20 March 2013 |newspaper=bdnews24.com |date=2 March 2013 }}</ref> While the government has held the Jamaat-e-Islami responsible for the attacks on the minorities, the Jamaat-e-Islami leadership has denied any involvement. The minority leaders have protested the attacks and appealed for justice. The ] has directed the law enforcement to start '']'' investigation into the attacks. ] express concern about attack of Jamaat on Bengali Hindu community.<ref name="US_amb_ds-1">{{cite news|title=US worried at violence|url=http://www.thedailystar.net/beta2/news/us-worried-at-violence/|access-date=12 March 2013|newspaper=]|date=12 March 2013}}</ref><ref name="US_amb_Itt-1">{{cite news|title=Mozena: Violence is not the way to resolution|url=http://www.clickittefaq.com/featured-area/mozena-violence-is-not-the-way-to-resolution/|access-date=12 March 2013|newspaper=]|date=11 March 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141116055856/http://www.clickittefaq.com/featured-area/mozena-violence-is-not-the-way-to-resolution/|archive-date=16 November 2014|url-status=dead}}</ref> The violence included the looting of Hindu properties and businesses, the burning of Hindu homes, and ] and destruction of ]s.<ref>{{cite web|title=Bangladesh: Wave of violent attacks against Hindu minority|url=http://amnesty.org/en/for-media/press-releases/bangladesh-wave-violent-attacks-against-hindu-minority-2013-03-06#.UTeKDSrYyD8.twitter|work=Press releases|publisher=Amnesty International|access-date=8 March 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130309203359/http://www.amnesty.org/en/for-media/press-releases/bangladesh-wave-violent-attacks-against-hindu-minority-2013-03-06#.UTeKDSrYyD8.twitter|archive-date=9 March 2013|url-status=dead}}</ref> According to community leaders, more than 50 ] and 1,500 Hindu homes were destroyed in 20 districts.<ref name="bbc09032013-1">{{cite news|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-21712655|title=Bangladesh minorities 'terrorised' after mob violence|last=Ethirajan|first=Anbarasan|date=9 March 2013|work=BBC News|access-date=17 March 2013|location=London}}</ref> On 5 May 2014, A mob of almost 3,000 attacked Hindu households and a temple in eastern Bangladesh after two youths from the community allegedly insulted the Islamic prophet, ] on ].<ref>{{cite news |date=5 May 2014 |title=Hindu households, temple attacked in Bangladesh |url=http://www.deccanherald.com/content/404464/hindu-households-temple-attacked-bangladesh.html |newspaper=Deccan Herald |location=Dhaka |access-date=27 May 2014 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |date=5 May 2014 |title=Mob of 3000 people attacks Hindu households, temple in Bangladesh |url=http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-mob-of-3000-people-attacks-hindu-households-temple-in-bangladesh-1985285 |newspaper=DNA India |location=Dhaka |access-date=27 May 2014 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |date=5 May 2014 |title=Mob of 3000 attack Hindu households, temple in Bangladesh |url=http://www.firstpost.com/world/mob-of-3000-attack-hindu-households-temple-in-bangladesh-1509359.html |newspaper=Firstpost |location=Bangladesh |access-date=27 May 2014}}</ref>
Historians have noted that during the British Empire "evangelical influence drove British policy down a path that tended to minimize and denigrate the accomplishments of Indian civilization and to position itself as the negation of the earlier British ] that was nourished by belief in Indian wisdom."<ref> Trautmann 1997:113</ref>.


=== India===
The contemporary academia in the ] has been criticized for portraying a biased interpretation of Hinduism and Hindus<ref name="Bagal pt 1"> by Abhijit Bagal</ref>. According to Abhijit Bagal, Rajiv Malhotra has claimed that an unnamed United States congressman who is a member of the India Caucus has commented that several works published by the "Religions in South Asia" (RISA) subgroup of the "American Academy of Religion" have a systemic anti-Hindu prejudice that "borders on hate-speech"<ref name="Bagal pt 1"/>. The portrayal of the Hindu God ] and the Puranic text ] by academics such as ] has been criticized by other academics such as David Gray as "partisan and political readings of the epic, as well as outright inflammatory 'cheap shots' at a sacred text". Wadley's works have been criticized for portraying Rama as "an invading-outsider, imperialist, oppressor, misogynist, and a racist and that the workbook sounds more like the rant of an over zealous racist than that of an objective and neutral scholar"<ref name="Bagal pt 1"/>.
{{See also|Persecution of Hindus#Post-Independence India}}
{{Expand section|date=February 2021}}
In March-April 2024, a ] in ] came to attention when a video showing that the church's footwalk tiles consisted of sacred Hindu symbols of ] and ] went viral on social media and sparked outrage. Following the backlash, the tiles containing those symbols were removed by the church.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2024-04-04 |title=ऊँ और स्वास्तिक के चिन्ह पर पैर रखकर चल रहे थे लोग, चर्च में नफरत वाला काम |url=https://hindi.news18.com/news/nation/church-in-andhra-pradesh-using-om-swastik-signs-on-foot-walk-tiles-video-gone-viral-8209684.html |access-date=2024-04-18 |website=News18 हिंदी |language=hi}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Commune |first=The |date=2024-04-05 |title=Following Social Media Outcry, Pathway Leading To Church With Tiles Having Hindu Symbols Removed |url=https://thecommunemag.com/following-social-media-outcry-pathway-leading-to-church-with-tiles-having-hindu-symbols-removed/ |access-date=2024-04-18 |website=The Commune |language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Deliberately hurting Hindu sentiments! Andhra Church uses 'Om' & 'Swastika' tiles for flooring |url=https://www.newsbharati.com/Encyc/2024/4/3/Andhra-Church-uses-Om-Swastika-tiles-for-flooring.html |access-date=2024-04-18 |website=www.newsbharati.com |language=en}}</ref>


On 27th August, 2024, a temple was vandalised in Hyderabad.<ref name="q364">{{cite web | title=Telangana: Hyderabad Police arrests 2 men for vandalising Bhoolaxmi temple idol | website=mint | date=27 August 2024 | url=https://www.livemint.com/news/hyderabad-police-news-vandalise-bhoolaxmi-temple-goddess-chandrayanagutta-telangana-constituency-riyasat-nagar-division-11724731256605.html | access-date=3 September 2024}}</ref> There was a massive protest after the vandalism and there is evidence that the men who vandalised the temple were ]'s men.<ref name="s353">{{cite web | last=Commune | first=The | title="Do Not Dare Touch Our Temples," BJP Leader Madhavi Latha Warns Amidst Vandalism At Hyderabad's Bhoolaxmi Temple, Massive Protests And Tensions Erupt | website=The Commune | date=27 August 2024 | url=https://thecommunemag.com/do-not-dare-touch-our-temples-bjp-leader-madhavi-latha-warns-amidst-vandalism-at-hyderabads-bhoolaxmi-temple-massive-protests-and-tensions-erupt/ | access-date=4 September 2024}}</ref><ref name="e882">{{cite web | title=Telangana: Tensions Erupt After Temple Vandalised In Hyderabad | website=ABP Live | date=27 August 2024 | url=https://news.abplive.com/states/telangana/telangana-temple-vandalised-in-hyderabad-family-claims-accused-mentally-unstable-tensions-erupt-1713033 | access-date=4 September 2024}}</ref>
In addition, RISA scholars are accused of holding the Hindu disapora in the United States with contempt and making derogatory remarks about Hindus and Hinduism that are "patently false"<ref name="Bagal pt4"> by Abhijit Bagal</ref>.RISA is also ctiticized for stressing on obscure practices within Hinduism that were never widely implemented (such as the ] horse sacrifice) in a deliberate ploy to mis-portray Hinduism as a "repulsive religion" while almost completely ignoring normative Hindu scripture and normative Hindu practices<ref name="Bagal pt4"/>.


In September 2024, stones were pelted at Ganesha idol processions in many parts of India.<ref name="y119">{{cite web | last=Ansari | first=Nahid | title=Clashes erupt in UP’s Mahoba after stone pelting during Ganesh idol procession | website=India Today | date=15 September 2024 | url=https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/uttar-pradesh-up-mahoba-city-kotwali-clash-stone-pelting-ganesh-idol-procession-2599975-2024-09-15 | access-date=15 September 2024}}</ref><ref name="y484">{{cite web | last=Singh | first=Umesh | title=SP Lodha transferred following stone-pelting incident during a Ganesh idol procession in MP's Ratlam | website=Deccan Herald | date=11 September 2024 | url=https://www.deccanherald.com/india/madhya-pradesh/sp-lodha-transferred-following-stone-pelting-incident-during-a-ganesh-idol-procession-in-mps-ratlam-3186192 | access-date=15 September 2024}}</ref><ref name="g631">{{cite web | title=Stones pelted at Ganesh pandal in Surat; 6 arrested | website=The Hindu | date=9 September 2024 | url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/gujarat/stones-pelted-at-ganesh-pandal-in-surat-6-arrested/article68620775.ece | access-date=15 September 2024}}</ref><ref name="c458">{{cite web | last=Samachar | first=Gujarat | title=After Surat stones pelted at Ganesh Pandal in Kutch | website=GujaratSamachar English | date=11 September 2024 | url=https://english.gujaratsamachar.com/news/gujarat/after-surat-stones-pelted-at-ganesh-pandal-in-kutch | access-date=15 September 2024}}</ref><ref name="g618">{{cite web | last=Raj | first=Gayathri V | title=Nagamangala Ganesha procession news: Stone pelting, lathi charge during procession in Karnataka's Nagamangala, Section 144 imposed | website=Deccan Herald | date=11 September 2024 | url=https://www.deccanherald.com/india/karnataka/stone-pelting-lathi-charge-during-ganesha-procession-in-nagamangala-mandya-district-3186911 | access-date=15 September 2024}}</ref> The police were also attacked in many places but managed to seize the swords used to attack the devotees; petrol bombs were also used to set shops on fire.<ref name="d085">{{cite web | title=Ganpati idol stone pelting incident: 52 held, BJP questions arrest of Hindu devotees | website=English.Mathrubhumi | date=12 September 2024 | url=https://english.mathrubhumi.com/news/india/stone-pelting-ganpati-idol-karnataka-police-arrest-bjp-slam-congress-1.9895563 | access-date=15 September 2024}}</ref> In another incident, the Ganesh idol was taken from the demonstrators by the police, who then secured it in an unoccupied police van, the snaps of which went viral online, as well as in newspapers; some claimed it was, "belittling" to do so.<ref name="r570">{{cite web | title=Bengaluru: Viral photo of Ganesh idol in police van sparks outrage | website=The Siasat Daily | date=14 September 2024 | url=https://www.siasat.com/bengaluru-viral-photo-of-ganesh-idol-in-police-van-sparks-outrage-3096126/ | access-date=15 September 2024}}</ref><ref name="c250">{{cite web | last=Verma | first=Shivam | title=Picture of Lord Ganesha’s idol in police van sparks row in Bengaluru: Here's what we know so far | website=DNA India | date=14 September 2024 | url=https://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-picture-of-lord-ganesha-idol-in-police-van-sparks-row-in-bengaluru-here-what-we-know-so-far-3107552 | access-date=15 September 2024}}</ref><ref name="k658">{{cite web | title=Lord Ganesha murti in Bengaluru police van sparks row: PM Modi says ‘in Congress-ruled Karnataka, even…’ | website=mint | date=15 September 2024 | url=https://www.livemint.com/news/lord-ganesha-murti-in-bengaluru-police-van-sparks-row-pm-modi-says-in-congress-ruled-karnataka-even-11726375067734.html | access-date=15 September 2024}}</ref>
The influence of such scholarship in American schools has also been criticized, with studies showing systemic bias against Hindus in the social studies curricula of American schools<ref name="Bagal pt4"/>.


=== Malaysia ===
The ], together with organizations like the ], have worked to counter biases against Hindus and Jews in college campuses like ]. Programs initiated by both groups have revealed numerous cases of academic hostility against both minorities<ref></ref>.
{{See also|Hinduism in Malaysia|2001 Kampung Medan riots|2009 cow head protests|HINDRAF|2007 HINDRAF rally}}


In April 2006, local authorities demolished several ]s to make way for developmental projects. Their reason was that these temples were unlicensed and squatting on government land. In April and May 2006, several Hindu temples were demolished by city hall authorities in the country, accompanied by violence against Hindus.<ref>,''malaysiakini.com''</ref> On 21 April 2006, the Malaimel Sri Selva Kaliamman Temple in ] was reduced to rubble after the city hall sent in bulldozers.<ref>{{cite web|title=Free domain sharing - Site not yet configured|url=http://www.gatago.com/talk/politics/mideast/12428067.html|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061104235008/http://www.gatago.com/talk/politics/mideast/12428067.html|archive-date=2006-11-04|work=gatago.com}}</ref>
====Society====
In addition, Christian televangelists such as ] in the United States has made remarks that are regarded as anti-Hindu, if not racist<ref></ref>, denouncing Hinduism as "demonic" and evoking similar canards against Hinduism. These remarks were widely condemned and rebutted by Indian Americans and many non-partisan advocacy groups<ref></ref>.


The president of the Consumers Association of ] and ] in ] had been helping to organise efforts to stop the local authorities in the ] dominated city of Shah Alam from demolishing a 107-year-old Hindu temple. The growing ] in Malaysia is a cause for concern to many ] who follow minority religions such as Hinduism.<ref>,''BBC''</ref>
In 2001, an American talk show host Tony Brown, made several derogatory anti-Hindu remarks in his talk show on WLS 890 AM that began with the concern among American workers about the influx of software engineers from India. he evoked anti-Hindu canards such as exaggerating the importance of the Caste System in Hinduism, and made patent falsehoods about Human Rights in India. Protests by Indian-American community leaders led to the radio host publicly apologising for his remarks against Hindus and Hinduism. In his apology, Brown said:


On 11 May 2006, armed city hall officers from ] forcefully demolished part of a 60-year-old suburban temple that serves more than 1,000 Hindus. The "]", a coalition of several NGO's, have protested these demolitions by lodging complaints with the ].<ref name="Finexp"> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070704022731/http://www.financialexpress.com/latest_full_story.php?content_id=128069|date=4 July 2007}},''Financial Express''</ref> Many Hindu advocacy groups have protested what they allege is a systematic plan of temple cleansing in ]. The official reason given by the ] has been that the temples were built "illegally". However, several of the temples are centuries old.<ref name="Finexp" />
{{cquote|The statements I made were derived from either books or articles that I read. Still, I had not considered the possibility of bigots using the information to persecute the Hindu minority in this country.That does not excuse me from the pain that I have caused by not being more circumspect <ref name="Radiohost">, ''rediff.com''</ref>.}}
According to a lawyer for the Hindu Rights Action Task Force, a Hindu temple is demolished in Malaysia once every three weeks.<ref> Reuters India - 8 November 2007</ref>


A group of Malaysian Muslims protested against the construction of a Hindu temple in a Muslim-majority neighborhood, using a cow's head in the demonstration, sparking concerns about racial and religious tensions in the country.<ref> Associated Press - 28 August 2009</ref>
After his apology, Brown also invited Swami Atmajnanananda of the Washington branch of the ] and an Indian journalist based in Chicago, J V Lakshmana Rao, to participate in the talk show. Atmajnanananda said one must draw a distinction between caste and casteism. He said:


=== Pakistan ===
{{cquote|The assumption that Hindus are inherently racists is dangerous.Caste does not play a role in one's occupation any more. One should not use the pitfalls of the Indian culture to attack Hinduism<ref name="Radiohost"/>.}}
{{See also|Persecution of Hindus#Pakistan 2|Decline of Hinduism in Pakistan|Sectarianism in Pakistan#Hindus|Pakistan studies|Religious discrimination in Pakistan#Hindus}}


In ], Hindus are often regarded as ]s (unbelievers) and blamed for "causing all the problems in Pakistan".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.kashmirherald.com/featuredarticle/democracyinpakistan.html|title=Why democracy didn't take roots in Pakistan?|work=kashmirherald.com}}</ref> On Pakistan Day, the Pakistan Army dropped leaflets in South and North Waziristan warning tribesmen about foreigners and their local supporters, using the term "Yahood Aur Hanood" (Jews and Hindus) to describe the perceived enemies. The leaflets aimed to differentiate between the war on terror and local tribes, urging vigilance against intruders.<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070817081717/http://www.jang.com.pk/thenews/mar2006-daily/24-03-2006/main/main5.htm |date=17 August 2007 }}, ''jang.com.pk''</ref> At the time of ] the 'hostage theory' had been espoused. According to this theory the ] was to be given a fair deal in Pakistan in order to ensure the protection of the ].<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=n5c9ta97GeoC&q=hostage+theory+partition&pg=PA72|title=The Long Partition and the Making of Modern South Asia: Refugees, Boundaries, Histories|last=Zamindar|first=Vazira Fazila-Yacoobali|publisher=Columbia University Press|year=2010|isbn=9780231138475|pages=72|quote=The logic of the ''hostage theory'' tied the treatment of Muslim minorities in India to the treatment meted out to Hindus in Pakistan.}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=PrqLBgAAQBAJ&q=In+this+regard,+it+repeatedly+stressed+the+hostage+population+theory+that+held+that+%27hostage%27+Hindu+and+Sikh+minorities+inside+Pakistan+would+guarantee+Hindu+India%27s+good+behaviour+towards+its+own+Muslim+minority.&pg=PA19|title=Creating a New Medina: State Power, Islam, and the Quest for Pakistan in Late Colonial North India|last=Dhulipala|first=Venkat|publisher=Cambridge University Press|year=2015|isbn=9781316258385|pages=19|quote=Within the subcontinent, ML propaganda claimed that besides liberating the 'majority provinces' Muslims it would guarantee protection for Muslims who would be left behind in Hindu India. In this regard, it repeatedly stressed the hostage population theory that held that 'hostage' Hindu and Sikh minorities inside Pakistan would guarantee Hindu India's good behaviour towards its own Muslim minority.}}</ref>
Refuting Brown's statement that lower castes were being persecuted in India, Rao spoke of affirmative actions in favor of the lower castes by the Government of India.


Separate electorates for Hindus and ] were established in 1985—a policy which was originally proposed by Islamist leader ]. Christian and Hindu leaders complained that they felt excluded from the county's political process, but the policy had strong support from ].<ref name="OBJ-31">{{cite book|url=https://archive.org/details/pakistaneyeofsto00benn|url-access=registration|quote=separate electorates for minorities in pakistan.|title=Pakistan: Eye of the Storm|date=2002|publisher=Yale University Press|isbn=0300101473|page=|last1=Jones|first1=Owen Bennett|access-date=9 December 2014}}</ref>
On ],], an article on the ], authored by thoracic and general surgeon and a commentator on National Public Radio in USA Pius Kamau, portrayed the entire Indian community and the Hindus with "bigoted views". Widespread letter-writing and protests from the Indian American community, the Denver post responded by conveying the writer and editor's apologies <ref name="Denverpost">, ''Indiacause.com''</ref>.


The ] (MMA), a coalition of Islamist political parties in Pakistan, calls for the increased ] of the government and society, specifically taking an anti-Hindu stance. The MMA leads the opposition in the ], held a majority in the ] Provincial Assembly, and was part of the ruling coalition in ]. However, some members of the MMA made efforts to eliminate their rhetoric against Hindus.<ref name="USdept2006"> Published by the US Department of State</ref>
On ] of that year, Denver Post also published a strong rebuttal to the original article By P.K. Vedanthan titled "Healing ethnic wounds"<ref name="Denverpost"/>.


The public school curriculum in Pakistan was Islamized during the 1980s.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://2001-2009.state.gov/g/drl/rls/irf/2006/71443.htm|title=Pakistan|work=U.S. Department of State}}</ref> The ] claims to undertake a major revision to eliminate such teachings and to remove Islamic teaching from secular subjects.<ref name="USdept2006" /> The bias in Pakistani textbooks was also documented by Y. Rosser (2003). She wrote that
In 2005, The ] protested against the defamation of Hinduism in an article in the '']'' alleging the false anti-Hindu canard of rape being a "just punishment for criminal behavior". The author removed the statement following the protest<ref name="SFchronicle">, ''Hindu American Foundation''</ref>.
{{Blockquote|"in the past few decades, social studies textbooks in Pakistan have been used as locations to articulate the hatred that Pakistani policy makers have attempted to inculcate towards their ] neighbours", and that as a result "in the minds of generations of Pakistanis, indoctrinated by the 'Ideology of Pakistan' are lodged fragments of hatred and suspicion."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.mlists.net/sindh-intl/mail/mail_abuseofhistory.htm |title=Abuse of History in Pakistan: Bangladesh to Kargil |access-date=2007-01-29 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20031114223934/http://www.mlists.net/sindh-intl/mail/mail_abuseofhistory.htm |archive-date=14 November 2003 |df=dmy }}, by Dr. Yvette C Rosser</ref>}}


The bias in Pakistani textbooks was studied by ], ], ], ], ], ], Y. Rosser and others.
In the same year, HAF also protested against an anti-Hindu article published in the ] where the writer, Paul Watson also equates Hinduism with the worship of cows and snakes<ref name="LAtimes">, ''Hindu American Foundation''</ref>.


A study by Nayyar & Salim (2003) that was conducted with 30 experts of Pakistan's education system, found that the textbooks contain statements that seek to create hate against Hindus. There was also an emphasis on ], Shahadat, wars and military heroes. The study reported that the textbooks also had a lot of gender-biased stereotypes. Some of the ] cited in the report were:
It has been alleged that Hindus are mis-represented and stereotyped by other Indian non-Hindu organizations in the United States, such as the ]. Many such organizations that have been accused of spreading hate-literature against Hindus have been criticised by Hindu Advocacy groups of being ideologically biased in favor of Liberal Socialism, which has been identified by many to be in opposition to religion in general. However, it has also been alleged that South Asian organizations in the US that defame Hinduism are funded and supported by several Islamist organizations prevalent in ], ] and ], as well as Christian Missionary organizations. These organizations have generally an anti-Indian, pro-Communist agenda.
{{Blockquote|"Insensitivity to the existing religious diversity of the nation"; "Incitement to militancy and violence, including encouragement of Jihad and Shahadat"; a "glorification of war and the use of force"; "Inaccuracies of fact and omissions that serve to substantially distort the nature and significance of actual events in our history"; "Perspectives that encourage ], ] and ] towards fellow citizens, especially women and religious minorities, and other towards nations" and "Omission of concepts ... that could encourage critical self awareness among students". (Nayyar & Salim 2003). The Pakistani Curriculum document for classes K-V stated in 1995 that "at the completion of Class-V, the child should be able to "Understand Hindu-Muslim differences and the resultant need for Pakistan. }}


A more recent textbook which was published in Pakistan and titled '']'', edited by ], has been heavily criticized by academic peer-reviewers for anti-Hindu biases and prejudices that are consistent with ], where Hindus are portrayed as "villains" and Muslims as "victims" living under the "disastrous Hindu rule" and "betraying the Muslims to the British", characterizations that academic reviewers found "disquieting" and having a "warped subjectivity".<ref>Lehmann, F., 1968, Pacific Affairs, University of British Columbia, pp. 644–645</ref><ref>Calkins, P. B. Pacific Affairs, ], pp. 643–644, 1968</ref><ref name="Ahmed">Ahmed, A., Pacific Affairs, University of British Columbia, pp. 645–647, 1968</ref>
The ] has recently endorsed several anti-Hindu remarks, referring to the Hindu deity Krishna as an "evil demon". For details, see ].


Ameer Hamza, a leader of the terrorist group ], wrote a highly derogatory book about Hinduism in 1999 called "Hindu Ki Haqeeqat" ("Reality of (a) Hindu"); he was not prosecuted by the Government.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://2001-2009.state.gov/g/drl/rls/irf/2004/35519.htm|title=Pakistan|work=U.S. Department of State}}</ref>
===In South Asia===
====Afghanistan====
The ] regime in ] was known for it's extremist attitudes and views on ], including their strict enforcement of ] ] law in the society. The Taliban regime declared that Hindus would be required to wear badges in public identifying themselves as Hindus, ostensibly to "protect them". This was part of the Taliban's plan to segregate "un-Islamic" and "idolatrous" communities from Islamic ones<ref>,''CNN''</ref>.


According to the Sustainable Development Policy Institute report 'Associated with the insistence on the ] has been an essential component of hate against ] and the Hindus. For the upholders of the Ideology of Pakistan, the existence of Pakistan is defined only in relation to Hindus, and hence the Hindus have to be painted as negatively as possible'<ref name=sdpi>Nayyar, A.H. and Salim, A. (eds.)(2003). . Report of the project ''A Civil Society Initiative in Curricula and Textbooks Reform''. Sustainable Development Policy Institute, Islamabad.</ref> A 2005 report by the ] a non profit organization in Pakistan, found that Pakistan Studies textbooks in Pakistan have been used to articulate the hatred that Pakistani policy-makers have attempted to inculcate towards the Hindus. "Vituperative animosities legitimise military and autocratic rule, nurturing a siege mentality. Pakistan Studies textbooks are an active site to represent India as a hostile neighbour", the report stated. "The story of Pakistan's past is intentionally written to be distinct from, and often in direct contrast with, interpretations of history found in India. From the government-issued textbooks, students are taught that Hindus are backward and superstitious." Further the report stated "Textbooks reflect intentional obfuscation. Today's students, citizens of Pakistan and its future leaders are the victims of these partial truths".<ref>, ], 2006-04-25</ref><ref name="LA Times Report: In Pakistan's Public Schools, Jihad Still Part of Lesson Plan - The Muslim nation's public school texts still promote hatred and jihad, reformers say."> By Paul Watson, Times Staff Writer; 18 August 2005; ]. 4 Page article online Retrieved on 2 January 2010</ref><ref name="Outlook India Magazine Report: Primers Of Hate - History or biology, Pakistani students get anti-India lessons in all their textbooks; 'Hindu, Enemy Of Islam' - These are extracts from government-sponsored textbooks approved by the National Curriculum Wing of the Federal Ministry of Education."> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060907003427/http://www.outlookindia.com/fullprint.asp?choice=2&fodname=20051010&fname=Pakistan+(F)&sid=1 |date=7 September 2006 }} By AMIR MIR; 10 October 2005; ] Retrieved on 2 January 2010</ref><ref>; by Arindam Banerji; 16 July 2003; ] Retrieved on 2 January 2010</ref>
The decree was regarded as an anti-Hindu one by several lawmakers and congressmen in the ], as well as by the ]n Government<ref name="cns">,''CNSnews.com''</ref>. There were widespread protests against this decree in both India and the United States.In the United States, chairman of the ] ] compared the decree to the practices of ], where ] were required to wear labels identifying them as such<ref>,''People's Daily''</ref>. In the ], congressmen wore yellow badges on the floor of the Senate during the debate as a demonstration of their solidarity with the Hindu minority in Afghanistan<ref name="cns"/>.


An editorial in '']'' discussed a report by '']'' noted that state-run schools, promoted extremism and bigotry. It highlighted that textbooks in Pakistani state schools propagate concepts like jihad, the inferiority of non-Muslims, and hostility towards India, which foster a bigoted and obscurantist mindset.<ref> {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090526140357/http://www.dawn.com/wps/wcm/connect/dawn-content-library/dawn/news/pakistan/11-curriculum-of-hatred--03 |date=26 May 2009 }}, '']'', 2009-05-20</ref><ref name="Dawn: ‘School texts spreading more extremism than seminaries’"> By Our Special Correspondent; Tuesday, 19 May 2009; '']''. Retrieved 1 January 2010</ref> According to a study by a US government commission, textbooks in Pakistani schools foster prejudice and intolerance of Hindus and other religious minorities, and most teachers view non-Muslims as enemies of Islam.<ref>{{Cite news|date=November 9, 2011|title=US commission: Pakistan schools teach Hindu hatred|work=]|agency=]|url=https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/world/2011/11/09/commission-pakistan-schools-teach-hindu-hatred/FW7nomQ0jk3H37kFgkkrkI/story.html|access-date=January 26, 2022}}</ref> According to historian Professor ], textbook reform in Pakistan began with ]'s introduction of Pakistan Studies and Islamic Studies in 1971. General ] later intensified ], exploiting these reforms to promote a religiously exclusive narrative, which has contributed to intolerance and extremism. The broader context includes issues with outdated and biased textbook content, with reform efforts struggling to address these problems comprehensively.<ref>, ], 2009-05-18</ref>
====Pakistan====
In Pakistan, anti-Hindu sentiments and beliefs are widely help among many sections of the population.
There is a general stereotype against Hindus in Pakistan. Hindus and Jews are regarded as "miserly"<ref>,''Daily times (Pakistan)</ref>.
Also,Hindus are often regarded as "Kaffirs" and blamed for "causing all the problems in Pakistan"<ref></ref>.Islamic fundamentalist groups operating within Pakistan and neighboring Afghanistan have broadcasted or disseminated anti-Hindu propaganda among the masses <ref>, ''jang.com.pk''</ref>, referring to Hindus as "Hanood" and blaming them for "collaborating with the foreigners" against the people of the region.


== Outside Asia ==
The ] (MMA), a coalition of Islamist political parties in Pakistan, calls for the increased Islamization of the government and society, specifically taking an anti-Hindu stance.The MMA leads the opposition in the national assembly, held a majority in the NWFP Provincial Assembly, and was part of the ruling coalition in Balochistan. However, some members of the MMA made efforts to eliminate their rhetoric against Hindus<ref name="USdept2006"> Published by the US Department of State</ref>.
=== Australia ===
In April 2024, a Hindu woman named ''Swastika Chandra'' from ] was banned from using the ] app because it considered her first name (''Swastika'') to be offensive and related to ]. ] is a hindu symbol of divinity and spirituality, however it's perception in other parts of the world is different due to the adoption of the symbol by the ] in the early 20th century. After a period of six months, Uber exempted the ban and apologized for the misunderstanding.<ref>{{Cite web |title=A woman called Swastika got an apology from Uber after it banned her because of her name |url=https://www.businessinsider.in/thelife/news/a-woman-called-swastika-got-an-apology-from-uber-after-it-banned-her-because-of-her-name/articleshow/109438904.cms |access-date=2024-04-20 |website=Business Insider}}</ref>


===Fiji===
The public school curriculum in Pakistan was Islamized during the 1980s. This included the adoption of a number of textbooks that included derogatory remarks against minority religious groups, particularly Hindus and ], and the generalized teaching of religious intolerance as acceptable. The government of Pakistan claims to undertake a major revision to eliminate such teachings and to remove Islamic teaching from secular subjects<ref name="USdept2006"/>. The bias in ]i textbooks was also documented by Y. Rosser (2003). She wrote that "in the past few decades, social studies textbooks in Pakistan have been used as locations to articulate the hatred that Pakistani policy makers have attempted to inculcate towards their ] neighbours”, and that as a result "in the minds of generations of Pakistanis, indoctrinated by the 'Ideology of Pakistan' are lodged fragments of hatred and suspicion." (Rosser 2003)
{{Unbalanced|date=September 2021}}
By the time ] gained independence from ], Hindus and other ] constituted nearly fifty percent of the total ]. Nevertheless, the colonial-era laws and the first constitution for Fiji, granted special rights to ].{{citation needed|date=July 2020}} These laws relegated Hindus as second class citizens of Fiji without full rights. For example, it denied them property rights, such as the ability to buy or own land. Hindus and other ] have since then not enjoyed equal human rights as other Fijians. They can only work as tenant farmers for Fijian landlords.<ref>Vasil, R. K. (1972) 'Communalism and constitution-making in Fiji', in Pacific Affairs 45 (1 & 2):21-41</ref> The difference in human rights has been a continuing source of conflict between "native" Fijians and Indo-Fijians, with native Fijians believing Fiji to be their ancestral land that only they can own, and Indo-Fijians demanding equal rights for all human beings.{{citation needed|date=July 2020}}{{Dubious |Dubious sweeping generalizations |reason=There are several hundred thousand indigenous Fijians; sweeping generalization about what they all think are likely to be inaccurate.|date=June 2016}}


Beyond land ownership, Hindus have been persecuted in the Fijian communal structure. Spike Boydell states, "the introduced the divisive and unworkable system of communal representation and communal electoral rolls. Thus, different communities were represented by their own kind. This still extends to schooling in a prevailing quasi ] educational system."<ref name=spike>Spike Boydell (2001), Department of Land Management and Development, School of Social and Economic Development, University of the South Pacific</ref>
The bias in Pakistani textbooks was studied by Rubina Saigol, Pervez Hoodbhoy, K. K. Aziz, I. A. Rahman, Mubarak Ali, A. H. Nayyar, Ahmed Saleem, Y. Rosser and others.


During the late 1990s, Fiji witnessed a series of riots by radical native Fijians against Hindus (and other Indo-Fijians). In the spring of 2000, the democratically elected ] led by ] ], who was a Hindu, was held hostage by a group headed by ]. They demanded a ] state exclusively for the native Fijians, thereby legally abolishing any ] the Hindu inhabitants held up until then. Hindu owned shops, Hindu schools and ] were destroyed, vandalized and looted.<ref name="Hindusin">{{cite web |url=http://www.hafsite.org/pdf/hhr_2005_html/fijiislands.htm |title=Hindus in South Asia and the Diaspora: A Survey of Human Rights 2005 |publisher=Hafsite.org |access-date=2013-04-30 |archive-date=12 July 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120712231835/http://www.hafsite.org/pdf/hhr_2005_html/fijiislands.htm |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref></ref>
A study by Nayyar & Salim (2003) that was conducted with 30 experts of Pakistan's education system, found that the textbooks contain statements that seek to create hate against Hindus. There was also an emphasis on ], Shahadat, wars and military heroes. The study reported that the textbooks also had a lot of gender-biased stereotypes. Some of the problems in Pakistani textbooks cited in the report were: ''“Insensitivity to the existing religious diversity of the nation”; "Incitement to militancy and violence, including encouragement of Jehad and Shahadat”; a “glorification of war and the use of force”; "Inaccuracies of fact and omissions that serve to substantially distort the nature and significance of actual events in our history"; “Perspectives that encourage ], ] and ] towards fellow citizens, especially women and religious minorities, and other towards nations” and “Omission of concepts ... that could encourage critical selfawareness among students”.'' (Nayyar & Salim 2003)


The ], and particularly ] who led the ], called for the creation of a ] and endorsed forceful conversion of Hindus after a coup d'état in 1987.{{citation needed|date=July 2020}} In 2012, Fiji Methodist Church's president, Tuikilakila Waqairatu, called for Fiji to officially declare ] as the ]; the Hindu community leaders demanded that Fiji be a ] state where religion and state are separate.<ref> Australian Broadcasting Corporation (6 Sep 2012)</ref>
The Pakistani Curriculum document for classes K-V stated in 1995 that "at the completion of Class-V, the child should be able to "Understand Hindu-Muslim differences and the resultant need for Pakistan."


=== United Kingdom ===
The Government of Pakistan does not restrict religious publishing; however, the Government restricts the right to freedom of speech with regard to religion. Ameer Hamza, a leader of the banned terrorist group ], wrote a highly derogatory book about Hinduism in ] called "Hindu Ki Haqeeqat" ("Reality of (a) Hindu"); he was not prosecuted by the Government<ref></ref>.
After the ] in October 2022, Hindu groups were set to boycott a review by Dr. Chris Allen, the review's head, because of perceived lack of impartiality.<ref>{{cite web | last=Watson | first=Greig | title=Leicester disorder: Hindu groups set to boycott review | website=BBC News | date=2022-10-29 | url=https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-leicestershire-63426507 | access-date=2022-11-01}}</ref>


A national report in the UK found that 51% of Hindu parents reported their children facing Anti-Hindu hate in schools, and found that schools had failed to monitor and address the issues. It also reported several cases of physical assault as well as beef being thrown at a student.<ref>{{cite web|title=Anti-Hindu Hate In Schools|url=https://henryjacksonsociety.org/event/anti-hindu-hate-in-schools/}}</ref>
====Bangladesh====
In Bangladesh, the ruling ] is regarded as an anti-Hindu party, and reportedly encourages anti-Hindu views and sentiments among the Muslim majority. Prominent political leaders frequently fall back on "Hindu bashing" in an attempt to appeal to extremist sentiment and to stir up communal passions. In one of the most notorious utterances of a mainstream Bangladeshi figure, the current Prime Minister ], while leader of the opposition in 1996, declared that the country was at risk of hearing "uludhhwani" (a Hindu custom involving women's ululation) from mosques, replacing the azaan (Muslim call to prayer) (eg, see Agence-France Press report of 18th November 1996, "Bangladesh opposition leader accused of hurting religious sentiment").


====Conservative Party====
Even the supposedly secular Awami League is not immune from this kind of scare-mongering. The current leader of the opposition, Sheikh Hasina, while Prime Minister, was alleged to have accused Bangladeshi Hindu leaders in New York of having dividied loyalties with "one foot in India and one in Bangladesh". Successive events such as this have contributed to a feeling of tremendous insecurity among the Hindu minority<ref>, ''hinduismtoday.com''</ref>.
In October 2018, it was reported that ] candidate for the ] ] had written a pamphlet, entitled ''No Man's Land'', for the ]. In it, Bailey argued that accommodating Hindus " ] of its community" and it is also turning the country into a "crime riddled cess pool". He also claimed that ] "bring their culture, their country and any problems they might have, with them" and that this was not a problem within the ] "because we've shared a religion and in many cases a language".<ref>{{Cite web|date=2018-10-04|title=Tory London mayoral candidate claimed celebrating Hindu and Muslim festivals has turned Britain into 'cesspool of crime'|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/conservative-london-candidate-mayor-shaun-bailey-hindu-muslim-festival-crime-a8566341.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220507/https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/conservative-london-candidate-mayor-shaun-bailey-hindu-muslim-festival-crime-a8566341.html |archive-date=7 May 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|access-date=2021-01-12|website=The Independent|language=en}}{{cbignore}}</ref> In the pamphlet, Bailey confused the Hindu religion with the ]: "You don't know what to do. You bring your children to school and they learn far more about ] than ]. I speak to the people who are from ] and they've been having Hindi <small>(sic)</small> days off."<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/anti-hindu-muslim-views-return-to-haunt-london-mayor-candidate-shaun-bailey/story-woCY6o4owDF4Yp9lnOxNBM.html|title=Anti-Hindu, Muslim views return to haunt London mayor candidate Shaun Bailey|last=Sonwalkar|first=Prasun|date=4 October 2018|website=]|language=en|access-date=4 October 2018}}</ref>


], the Deputy Chairman of the Conservative Party, defended Bailey and suggested that Bailey's remarks were being misconstrued. He implied that black boys were turning to crime due to exposure to other religions rather than focusing on "their own ]." However, the anti-racism organization ] condemned Bailey's comments as "grotesque."<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/oct/04/tory-concerns-shaun-bailey-remarks-london-mayoral-race |title=Tory deputy chairman admits concerns about Shaun Bailey remarks |last=Sabbagh |first=Dan |date=4 October 2018 |website=The Guardian |language=en |access-date=4 October 2018}}</ref>
The fundamentalists and right-wing parties such as the ] and Jatiya Party often portray Hindus as being sympathetic to India, making accusations of ] and allegations of transferring economic resources to India, contributing to a widespread perception that Bangladeshi Hindus are disloyal to the state. Also, the right wing parties claim the Hindus to be backing the Awami League<ref></ref>.


=== United States ===
As widely documented in international media, Bangladesh authorities have had to increase security to enable Bangladeshi Hindus to worship freely<ref>, ''BBC''</ref> following widespread attacks on places of worship and devotees.
{{see also|Persecution of Hindus#United States}}


The rise of the ] in the ] has triggered some isolated attacks on them, as has been the case with many minority groups in the United States. Attacks which specifically target ] stem from what is often referred to as the "racialization of religion" among Americans, a process that begins when certain phenotypical features which are associated with a group and attached to race in popular discourse become associated with a particular religion or religions. The racialization of Hinduism in American perception has led Americans to perceive Hindus as belonging to a separate group and this contributes to prejudices against them.<ref>Joshi, Khyati, The Racialization of Hinduism, Islam, and Sikhism in the United States, Equity & Excellence in Education, Volume 39, Number 3, August 2006, pp. 211–226(16)</ref>
====India====
In India, personalities such as ] and ] are often accused of anti-Hindu sentiments,as are Islamist organizations such as the ] and terrorist groups like ], and Christian organizations such as the ].


In 2019, Swaminarayan Temple in ] was vandalised. They sprayed black paint on the deity and sprayed "] is the only God" on the walls. The ] was also spray painted on various walls.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Hindu temple vandalised with hate speech in US, hateful words written on walls|url=https://www.timesnownews.com/international/article/hindu-temple-vandalised-with-hate-speech-in-us-hateful-words-written-on-walls/357400|access-date=2021-01-12|website=www.timesnownews.com|date=31 January 2019 |language=en}}</ref>{{Better source needed|date=August 2021}} In April 2015, a ] in north ] was vandalised when nasty images were spray-painted on its walls. In February 2015, Hindu temples in ] and the ] were also vandalised.<ref>{{Cite news|agency=PTI|date=2019-01-31|title=Hindu temple vandalised in U.S.|language=en-IN|work=The Hindu|url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/international/hindu-temple-vandalised-in-us/article26136111.ece|access-date=2021-01-12|issn=0971-751X}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=US: Hindu temple vandalized in Kentucky, deity sprayed black paint|url=https://in.news.yahoo.com/us-hindu-temple-vandalized-kentucky-062710369.html|access-date=2021-01-12|website=in.news.yahoo.com|language=en}}</ref>
In 2006, a ] based Christian evangelist named M.G. Mathew released an anti-Hindu book titled ']' (] for 'reality') and had ] organizations like the All-India Christian Council distribute the text in the Indian state of ]. The book attacked ] and ] beliefs and practices and was widely criticized as a propaganda tool created for missionary purposes. The book is presently banned by the Indian government (''for details see'': ]).


In July 2019, a Hindu priest wearing his religious attire was physically assaulted by Sergio Gouveia in ], New York, just two blocks from Shiv Shakti Peeth Temple in ]. A Senator and the ] have labeled it a ], stating, "If someone is targeted because of religious robe and a couple of blocks from the temple where he resides, it is difficult to believe this was random." However, the ] have not classified it as a hate crime.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://pix11.com/2019/07/23/community-leaders-rally-around-hindu-priest-who-was-beaten/|title=Community leaders rally around Hindu priest who was beaten|date=23 July 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://newyork.cbslocal.com/2019/07/23/hindu-priest-assaulted-hate-crime-swami-ji-harish-chander-puri-attorney-general-letitia-james/|title=State Attorney General James Calls Unprovoked Attack On Hindu Priest In Queens A Hate Crime|date=23 July 2019}}</ref>
In addition, extremist fringes within the broader movement for the legitimate emancipation for the ]s, such as ] have expressed anti-Hindu views and sentiments, demanding the eradication of Hindus and expressing support for various ] groups around the world, as well as support for ] ideologies such as ].They have also alleged that ], together with Jews in the west, are engaged in a systematic conspiracy with Hindu ]s in India to "crush Muslims, Blacks and India's ] ] Dalits" <ref>Dalit Voice, 16-1-1993##</ref>.
===Other Countries===
====South Africa====
South Africa is home to a small Hindu minority.In ], the son of a firebrand Islamic cleric named Ahmed Deedat, circulated a DVD that denounced South African Hindus. The elder Deedat, former head of the Arab funded "Islamic Propagation Centre International" (IPCI),had previously circulated an anti-Hindu video in the 80's where he said that Indian Muslims were 'fortunate' that their Hindu forefathers 'saw the light' and converted to Islam when Muslim rulers dominated some areas of India. His video was widely criticized. While Hindus in South Africa have largely ignored the new anti-Hindu DVD circulated by Deedat Junior, he has been severely criticized by local Muslims, including other members of the IPCI.The IPCI said in a statement that Yusuf Deedat did not represent the organisation in any way.Deedat Junior, undeterred by the opposition from his own brethren, continues to circulate the material.He has placed advertisements in newspapers inviting anyone to collect a free copy from his residence to see for themselves "what the controversy is about"<ref>,''India Enews''</ref>.


==== Pat Robertson ====
==Anti-Hindu crimes==
In addition, anti-Hindu views have been expressed which are specifically based on misperceptions of the religion of Hinduism as well as mistaken racial perceptions. In the United States ] has denounced Hinduism as "]", believing that when Hindus "feel any sort of inspiration, whether it's by a river or under a tree, on top of a hill, they figure that some God or spirit is responsible for that. And so they'll worship that tree, they'll worship that hill or they'll worship anything."<ref>''The 700 Club'', 23 March 2006.</ref> His remarks were widely condemned and disputed by ] and members of many non-partisan advocacy groups.<ref>{{cite web|title=Using TV, Christian Pat Robertson Denounces Hinduism as "Demonic" |url=http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/7027/htoday.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091020024413/http://geocities.com/CapitolHill/7027/htoday.html |archive-date=20 October 2009 |url-status=dead |df=dmy }}</ref> ] leader ] defended Robertson's remarks, saying "any belief system, any ], whether it's ] ] or Hinduism or ] for that matter, ], that keeps persons captive and keeps them from coming to faith in the ], yes, is a demonstration of satanic power."<ref>''The O'Reilly Factor'', Fox News Channel. 17 March 2006.</ref>
''See Also'': ]


==== United States Congress ====
Recently, hate crimes against Hindus have risen in European countries such as the ] and ]. In the UK, many Hindus have been assaulted and killed. However, a strong undercurrent of deliberate ] does exist in many radical fringe elements of British society, for example, certain members of the ] and various ] groups that have been classified by advocacy organizations such as the ] as ]. In Russia, hate crimes against Hindus has risen both due to racial ideologies perpetrated by rising Neo-Nazi factions, as well as religious intolerance exhibited by some elements of the ].
{{Main|Rajan Zed prayer protest}}


In July, 2007, The ] conducted its morning prayer services with a Hindu prayer,<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/12/AR2007071202007.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200127225107/https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/12/AR2007071202007.html|archive-date=2020-01-27|url-status=dead|title=Senate Prayer Led by Hindu Elicits Protest|access-date=2008-12-19 | newspaper=The Washington Post | date=2007-07-13}}</ref> a historical first. During the service, three disruptors, named Ante Nedlko Pavkovic, Katherine Lynn Pavkovic and Christen Renee Sugar, from the Fundamentalist Christian activist group ]<ref name="news.bostonherald.com" /> protested by arguing that the Hindu prayer was "an ]", and they also claimed that they were "Christians and Patriots". They were swiftly arrested and charged with disrupting Congress.<ref>{{cite news| url=https://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/13/washington/13brfs-AHINDUPRAYER_BRF.html?ex=1341979200&en=851dbe33e5130b8d&ei=5124&partner=digg&exprod=digg | work=The New York Times | title=A Hindu Prayer in the Senate Meets Protest | date=2007-07-13 | access-date=2010-04-25}}</ref><ref>{{YouTube|EZ9To30Hz7|A link to YouTube video}}</ref>
Hate crime statistics against Hindus in North American countries are unavailable. However, it is believed that sporadic bouts of communal and institutional hatred against Hindus have occurred, though their frequency may have decreased in recent years. In the late 1980's a ] street gang calling themselves the "]" targeted, threatened and attacked South Asians, specifically Hindus <ref>, ''hinduismtoday.com''</ref>.


The event generated a storm of protest by ] groups in the country, with the ] (AFA) opposing the prayer and carrying out a campaign to lobby senators to protest against it.<ref>Michelle Boorstein, , ''Washington Post'' (27 July 2007).</ref><ref>, ''Las Vegas Sun'' (13 July 2007).</ref> Their representative attacked the proceedings as "gross idolatry".<ref name="news.bostonherald.com">{{cite news|url=http://www.bostonherald.com/news/national/politics/view.bg?articleid=1010979|title=Christian protesters disrupt first Senate prayer by a Hindu|date=12 July 2007|work=]|access-date=20 March 2011|location=Washington}}</ref> The AFA sent an "Action Alert" to its members in which it asked them to e-mail, write letters, or call their Senators and ask them to oppose the Hindu prayer, stating that it is "seeking the invocation of a non-monotheistic god."<ref name="Hindu Prayer in Senate Disrupted">"." ] (published on ]). 2007-06-12. Retrieved on 2007-06-15</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.afa.net/Petitions/issuedetail.asp?id=257 |title=ActionAlert: Hindu to open Senate with prayer |publisher=American Family Association |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070715175738/http://www.afa.net/Petitions/issuedetail.asp?id=257 |archive-date=15 July 2007 |df=dmy }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/12/AR2007071202007.html|title=Senate Prayer Led by Hindu Elicits Protest|work=washingtonpost.com}}</ref> The "alert" stated that "since Hindus worship multiple gods, the prayer will be completely outside the American paradigm, flying in the face of the American motto ''].''"<ref>"''Hindu to open Senate with prayer'' AFA Action Alert, July 10, 2007"</ref> The convocation by Zed was in fact disrupted by three protesters in the gallery reportedly shouting "this is an abomination" and other complaints.<ref name="Hindu Prayer in Senate Disrupted" />
On ], ], The Hindu American Foundation represented Hindus as a part of a coalition of civil rights, educational and religious submitting comments to the Department of Justice on its implementation of the Hate Crime Statistics Act (HCSA). Enacted by Congress in 1990, the HCSA requires the Justice Department to acquire data on crimes which "manifest prejudice based on race, religion, sexual orientation, or ethnicity" from law enforcement agencies across the country and to publish an annual report of its the findings<ref></ref>.


], executive director of ], said the protest "shows the intolerance of many ] activists. They say they want more religion in the public square, but it's clear they mean only their religion."<ref name="news.bostonherald.com" />
===HAF report===
The ], an advocacy group for Hindus, released a report in 2005 on the status of the human rights of Hindus, mainly in ], ], and the ] valley. The report attempts to increase awareness of anti-Hindu views propagated and used to justify violations of the human rights of many Hindus in the region. The report introduces as:


==== California Textbook Controversy ====
{{cquote|
{{Main|California textbook controversy over Hindu history}}
] are by definition universal. Hence, in an ideal world there would be no need to write a separate report on the human rights of Hindus, or for that matter any other group. In the real world, unfortunately, there is a gaping hole when it comes to the awareness of human rights for Hindus, mainly in Bangladesh, ] and in the ] valley <ref name="HAFreport"></ref>.}}


A controversy in the ] of ] concerning the portrayal of ] in history textbooks began in 2005. A protest was led by Vedic Foundation (VF) and the American Hindu Education Foundation (HEF) by complaining to the California's Curriculum Commission, saying the coverage in sixth grade history ] of ] and Hinduism was biased against Hinduism; and points of contention includes a textbook's portrayal of the ], the ], and the ] as the main features of Hinduism.
The 71-page report compiles media coverage and firsthand accounts of human rights violations perpetrated against Hindus because of their religious identity. The incidents are documented, often quoting from well-known international human rights organizations <ref name="HAFreport"/>.The Hindu American Foundation presented the report to the co-chairs of the ]ional Caucus on India and ], Representatives ], a ], and ], a ]. Both of these members of Congress endorsed it<ref name="Pacislands">
Second Annual Report On Hindu Human Rights Released, ''Pacific Magazine''</ref>.Rabbi Abraham Cooper, Associate Dean and co-founder of the ], praised the HAF for the report.


The ] (CDE) initially sought to resolve the controversy by appointing Shiva Bajpai, Professor Emeritus at ], as a one-man committee to review revisions proposed by the groups.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.flonnet.com/fl2301/stories/20060127000807700.htm|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120220161440/http://www.flonnet.com/fl2301/stories/20060127000807700.htm|url-status=dead|archive-date=2012-02-20|title=A saffron assault abroad|last=flrvs|access-date=2017-02-06}}</ref> ] and others revisited the proposed changed on behalf of the ] and suggested reverting some of the approved changes.<ref name="in.rediff.com">{{Cite news|url=http://in.rediff.com/news/2006/mar/19edu.htm|title=Hindu groups sue California Board of Education|newspaper=Rediff|access-date=2017-02-06}}</ref> In early 2006, the ] sued the State Board over matters of process;<ref name="in.rediff.com" /> the case was settled in 2009.
{{cquote|The Simon Wiesenthal Center welcomes this report which will help the international community and Non-governmental Organizations to have a broader understanding of the human rights situation in that important region of the world<ref name="Pacislands"/>.}}


==== Dotbusters ====
Several academics on campuses around the U.S. also reviewed this year’s report. Florida International University Professor of religious Studies, Nathan Katz, remarked on the promulgation of various anti-Hindu sentiments recorded in the report:
{{Main|Dotbusters}}


The ] was a ] in ], that attacked and threatened ] in the fall of 1987.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Gutierrez |first1=Elizabeth |title=THE -DOTBUSTER- ATTACKS: HATE CRIME AGAINST ASIAN INDIANS IN JERSEY CITY, NEW JERSEY |url=https://www.overcominghateportal.org/uploads/5/4/1/5/5415260/dotbuster_attacks.pdf |publisher=Geography and Urban Studies Temple UniversitY Philadelphia, PA 19122 |access-date=September 17, 2024 |page=30}}</ref> The name originates from the ] traditionally worn by Hindu women and girls on their forehead. In July 1987, they had a letter published in the '']''<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1987/10/12/nyregion/in-jersey-city-indians-protest-violence.html|title=In Jersey City, Indians Protest Violence|last=Marriott|first=Michel|date=12 October 1987|work=]|page=1|access-date=20 March 2011}}</ref> stating that they would take any means necessary to drive the Indians out of Jersey City:
{{cquote|“This report by the Hindu American Foundation…is a real eye-opener”.“As a minority in Islamic societies that consider them to be ‘idolaters,’ Hindus in Bangladesh, Pakistan and Afghanistan face unimaginable persecution routinely<ref name="Pacislands"/>.}}
<blockquote>I'm writing about your article during july about the abuse of ]. Well I'm here to state the other side. I hate them, if you had to live near them you would also. We are an organization called dot busters. We have been around for 2 years. We will go to any extreme to get Indians to move out of Jersey City. If I'm walking down the street and I see a Hindu and the setting is right, I will hit him or her. We plan some of our most extreme attacks such as breaking windows, breaking car windows, and crashing family parties. We use the phone books and look up the name Patel. Have you seen how many of them there are? Do you even live in Jersey City? Do you walk down Central avenue and experience what its like to be near them: we have and we just don't want it anymore. You said that they will have to start protecting themselves because the police cannot always be there. They will never do anything. They are a weak race physically and mentally. We are going to continue our way. We will never be stopped.<ref name="pluralism">{{cite web|url=http://www.pluralism.org/ocg/CDROM_files/hinduism/dot_busters.php|title=On Common Ground: World Religions in America - The Pluralism Project}}</ref>
</blockquote>


==Resolutions and proclamations recognizing Hinduphobia==
The report documents the long history of anti-Hindu atrocities in Bangladesh, a topic that many Indians and Indian governments over the years have preferred not to acknowledge. Such atrocities, including targeted attacks against temples, open theft of Hindu property, and ] of young Hindu women and enticements to ] to ], have increased sharply in recent years after the ] joined the coalition government led by the ].
In April 2023, ] became the first state in the United States to pass a resolution condemning Hinduphobia.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Now {{!}} |first=Times |date=2023-04-01 |title=Georgia legislature takes aim at attacks on Hinduism, passes resolution against Hinduphobia |url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/india/georgia-legislature-takes-aim-at-attacks-on-hinduism-passes-resolution-against-hinduphobia/videoshow/99165100.cms |access-date=2023-08-04 |website=The Economic Times |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Georgia passes resolution condemning Hinduphobia, becomes first US state to do so |url=https://www.aninews.in/news/world/us/georgia-passes-resolution-condemning-hinduphobia-becomes-first-us-state-to-do-so20230401123316/ |website=ANI News |access-date=September 17, 2024 |date=April 1, 2023}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=The resolution was initiated by representatives of Forsyth County as part of Hindu Advocacy Day! |url=https://cohna.org/georgia-state-legislature-passes-the-first-ever-county-resolution-condemning-hinduphobia-and-anti-hindu-hate/ |website=Coalition of Hindus of North America |access-date=September 17, 2024}}</ref> That same month, the city of Fremont, California issued a proclamation acknowledging that "Hindu Americans have been the targets of bullying, discrimination, hate speech, harassment, and bias-motivated crimes."<ref>{{Citation |title=April 18, 2023 City Council Meeting |url=https://fremontca.viebit.com/player.php?hash=SRI3LUx6R0XH |access-date=2023-08-04 |language=en}}</ref>


==Criticism==
The report concludes with:
Some academics question the usage of the term "Hinduphobia" in the West. Brian Collins{{Efn|Collins is the Chair Professor in Indian Religion and Philosophy at ].}} found the tropes of Hinduphobia to be a popular weapon employed by the affluent Hindu diaspora in stifling critical academic discourses on Hinduism—parallels with ] were drawn.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Collins|first=Brian|title=The Head Beneath the Altar: Hindu Mythology and the Critique of Sacrifice|date=2014|publisher=Michigan State University Press|isbn=978-1-61186-116-7|pages=26–28|chapter=Introduction|doi=|jstor=10.14321/j.ctt7zt5hc.4}}</ref> Scholars affiliated to South Asia Scholar Activist Collective (SASAC)<ref>{{Cite news|title=Hindutva's threat to academic freedom|language=en-US|newspaper=Washington Post|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/religion/hindutvas-threat-to-academic-freedom/2021/07/07/476a8128-df73-11eb-a27f-8b294930e95b_story.html|access-date=2021-07-10|issn=0190-8286}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|last=Prakash|first=Priyali|title='Targeted by hate': Audrey Truschke on why she helped write a 'Hindutva Harassment Field Manual'|url=https://scroll.in/article/999710/targeted-by-hate-audrey-truschke-on-why-she-helped-write-a-hindutva-harassment-field-manual|access-date=2021-07-10|website=Scroll.in|date=10 July 2021 |language=en-US}}</ref> reject "Hinduphobia" as an ahistorical and inappropriate ] employed by the Hindu Right in order to suppress academic inquiry into topics concerned with Hinduism, Hindutva, caste, and Indian State.<ref name=":1">{{Cite web|title=Bad Faith Bias Claims|url=https://www.hindutvaharassmentfieldmanual.org/badfaith|access-date=2021-07-10|website=Hindutva Harassment Field Manual|language=en-US}}</ref><ref name=":2">{{Cite web|title=Glossary|url=https://www.hindutvaharassmentfieldmanual.org/glossary|access-date=2021-07-10|website=Hindutva Harassment Field Manual|language=en-US}}</ref> While racist and anti-Hindu prejudices have been indeed observed, in their view, Hindus have not faced any entrenched systematic oppression in India or United States.<ref name=":1" /><ref name=":2" /> The claimants of Hinduphobia were also accused of engaging in discrimination against Muslims, lower-castes, Dalits, Christians, and progressive Hindus.<ref name=":2" />


== See also ==
{{cquote|Some Indians may feel uncomfortable with this report because they do not want to be reminded about the problems of Hindus outside their milieu. And for some in the Indian ], it is a badge of honour to distance themselves from these ]s as a mark of their supposed enlightenment, oddly trashing their own ] in the process. Many more Indians are reluctant to speak out against atrocities committed against Hindus for fear of being labeled "communal". Merely speaking about human rights for Hindus is for them a form of ]}}
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]


== Notes ==
The people whose persecution is amply documented in this report are being persecuted because they are Hindu, not because they are poor or because of their political views. Human rights activists in Bangladesh and Pakistan, many of whom are not Hindus, have painstakingly documented the violations of basic human rights of Hindus in their country.
{{notelist|30em}}


==Anti-Hindutva== == References ==
{{Reflist}}
Many Anti-Hindu groups and organizations prefer to call themselves Anti-], claiming to oppose the alleged ideology of ] in India. Although some organizations discuss legitimate issues and sectarian problems with the Hindutva movement, others use the criticism of Hindutva as an excuse to attack Hindus in general. The criticism of ] often goes beyond the criticism of a political/religious movement and degenerates into anti-Hindu rhetoric and hatemongering<ref> by Yvette Claire Rosser, The Infinity Foundation</ref>. This is similar to the concept where ] prefer to call themselves ]. Publications such as ] have routinely conflated Hinduism with Hindutva<ref>Dalit Voice, vol.25, No.1</ref> and have been criticized for anti-Hindu and ] attacks<ref> Ayodhya and After, Koenraad Elst (Chpt 14)</ref><ref>{{cite book
| last = Heuzé
| first = Gérard
| authorlink = Gérard Heuzé
| title = Où va l’Inde moderne? (p 87)
| publisher = L’Harmattan
| date = 1993
}}
</ref>.


==See also== ==Sources==
{{Refbegin}}
*]
<!-- L -->
*]
* {{Citation | last =Long | first =Jeffery D. | year =2011 | title =Historical Dictionary of Hinduism | publisher =Scarecrow Press}}
*]
{{Refend}}
*]


==Further reading== == Further reading ==
* {{cite journal|last1=Balagangadhara|first1=S.N.|first2=Sarah|last2=Claerhout|date=Spring 2008|title=Are Dialogues Antidotes to Violence? Two Recent Examples From Hinduism Studies|journal=Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies|volume=7|issue=19|pages=118–143|url=http://www.jsri.ro/new/?download=19_balagangadhara_claerhout.pdf|access-date=17 January 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090820023251/http://www.jsri.ro/new/?download=19_balagangadhara_claerhout.pdf|archive-date=20 August 2009|url-status=dead}}
"Muslim League attack on Sikhs and Hindus in the Punjab, 1947" by S. Gurbachan Singh Talib, Shiromani Gurdwara
* {{cite book|last1=Benkin|first1= Richard L.|publication-date=1 January 2014|title=A Quiet Case of Ethnic Cleansing - The Murder of Bangladesh's Hindus|year= 2014|place=New Delhi|publisher=Akshaya Prakashan|edition=2nd|isbn=978-8188643523|language=en}}
Parbandhak Committee
* {{cite book|last1=Kamra|first1=A. J.|publication-date=2000|title=The prolonged partition and its pogroms: Testimonies on violence against Hindus in East Bengal 1946-64|year=2000 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=MFtuAAAAMAAJ|publisher=Voice of India|isbn= 9788185990637|access-date=23 January 2023}}
* {{cite book|last1=Rosser|first1=Yvette Claire|publication-date=2003|title=Islamization of Pakistani Social Studies Textbooks|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=tq7rAAAAMAAJ|place=New Delhi|publisher=Rupa & Co|isbn= 9788129102218 |series=Monograph (Observer Research Foundation)|year=2003 |access-date=23 January 2023}}.
* {{cite web|last1=Chaturvedi|first1= Vinayak|date=1 December 2021|url=https://www.thenation.com/article/culture/hindu-right-academic-freedom/|title=The Hindu Right and Attacks on Academic Freedom in the US|website=The Nation|access-date=23 January 2023}}


== External links ==
==Notes==
{{Wikiquote}}
<div class="references-small" style="-moz-column-count:2; column-count:2;">
* {{cite book|title=HYPERLINK TO HINDUPHOBIA: Online hatred, extremism and bigotry against Hindus|url=https://www.hinduamerican.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/hate_report_2007.pdf|publisher=Hindu American Foundation|publication-date=2007|access-date=23 January 2023}}
<references/>
</div>


{{Hindudharma|collapsed}}
==Links==
{{Religious persecution}}
*
{{Theology}}{{Discrimination}}{{Authority control}}
*
* in ], anti-Hindu propaganda
*
*


] ]
] ]

Latest revision as of 07:50, 27 December 2024

This article is about hatred of, or prejudice towards Hindus. For religious persecution of Hindus, see Persecution of Hindus.

This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
This article may be in need of reorganization to comply with Misplaced Pages's layout guidelines. Please help by editing the article to make improvements to the overall structure. (July 2021) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
This article's lead section may be too short to adequately summarize the key points. Please consider expanding the lead to provide an accessible overview of all important aspects of the article. (January 2022)
(Learn how and when to remove this message)

Freedom of religion
Concepts
Status by country
Africa
North and South America
Asia
Europe
Middle East
Oceania
Topical
Religious persecution
Religion portal
Part of a series on
Discrimination
Forms
Attributes
Social
Religious
Ethnic/national
Manifestations
Policies
Countermeasures
Related topics
Part of a series on
Hinduism
OriginsHistorical

Traditional

Sampradaya (Traditions)
Major Sampradaya (Traditions)
Other Sampradaya (Traditions)
Deities
Absolute Reality / Unifying Force
Trimurti
Tridevi
Other major Devas / Devis
Vedic Deities:
Post-Vedic:
Devatas
Concepts
Worldview
Ontology
Supreme reality
God
Puruṣārtha (Meaning of life)
Āśrama (Stages of life)
Three paths to liberation
Liberation
Mokṣa-related topics:
Mind
Ethics
Epistemology
Practices
Worship, sacrifice, and charity
Meditation
Yoga
Arts
Rites of passage
Festivals
Philosophical schools
Six Astika schools
Other schools
Gurus, Rishi, Philosophers
Ancient
Medieval
Modern
Texts
Sources and classification of scripture
Scriptures
Vedas
Divisions
Upanishads
Rigveda:
Yajurveda:
Samaveda:
Atharvaveda:
Vedangas
Other scriptures
Itihasas
Puranas
Upavedas
Shastras, sutras, and samhitas
Stotras, stutis and Bhashya
Tamil literature
Other texts
Hindu Culture & Society
Society
Hindu Art
Hindu Architecture
Hindu Music
Food & Diet Customs
Time Keeping Practices
Hindu Pilgrimage
Other society-related topics:
Other topics
Hinduism by country
Hinduism & Other Religions
Other Related Links (Templates)

Anti-Hindu sentiment, sometimes also referred to as Hinduphobia, is a negative perception, sentiment or actions against the practitioners or religion of Hinduism. It exists in many contexts in many countries, often due to historical conflict. There is also scholarly debate on what constitutes Hinduphobia in the Western World.

Destroyed Hindu temple

Definitions

Scholar Jeffery D. Long defines the term "Hinduphobia" as an irrational aversion of Hindus or Hinduism. Vamsee Juluri, a Professor of Media Studies at the University of San Francisco agrees.

Examples of anti-Hindu sentiments

According to the religious dialogue activist P. N. Benjamin, some Christian evangelists denigrate Hindu gods and consider Hindu rituals barbaric, and such attitudes have caused tensions between religious communities.

Akbaruddin Owaisi, a leader of the All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen party in Hyderabad, has been charged several times for hate speeches denigrating Hindu gods and inciting violence against Hindus.

A Muslim preacher apologised for insulting Hinduism in 2014, after an uproar. Hindus have historically been, and continue to be, considered Kafirs by some Muslims and Heathen, Satanic or Demonic by some Christians.

Asia

Afghanistan

See also: Hinduism in Afghanistan

Religious persecution, discrimination of Hindus has caused Afghanistan's Hindu population to dwindle. Sikhs and Hindus are continuing to flee from Afghanistan as of July 2020.

The Taliban government in Afghanistan, which enforced strict sharia (Islamic law), announced plans to require all Hindus (and Sikhs) to wear identifying badges in public in May 2001 as part of the Taliban's campaign to segregate and repress "un-Islamic and idolatrous segments" of Afghan society. At the time, about 500 Hindus and 2,000 Sikhs remained in Afghanistan. The anti-Hindu decree was seen by many as being reminiscent of the Nazi law which required all Jews to wear identifying yellow badges. The order prompted international outrage, and it was denounced by the Indian and U.S. governments, as well as by Abraham Foxman of the ADL. Following international pressure, the Taliban regime dropped the badge plans in June 2001.

Bangladesh

See also: Persecution of Hindus in Bangladesh

In Bangladesh political leaders frequently face controversy for spreading anti-Hindu sentiment in an attempt to appeal to religious extremists and incite community outrage. One of the most well known instances of this occurred in 1996 when Khaleda Zia a previous Prime Minister, and then leader of the opposition, declared that the country was at risk of hearing "uludhhwani" (a Bengali Hindu custom involving women's ululation) from mosques, replacing the azaan (Muslim call to prayer).

The fundamentalists and right-wing parties such as the Bangladesh Nationalist Party and Jatiya Party often portray Hindus as being sympathetic to India, making accusations of dual loyalty and allegations of transferring economic resources to India, contributing to a widespread perception that Bangladeshi Hindus are disloyal to the state. Also, the right wing parties claim the Hindus to be backing the Awami League.

On 28 February 2013, the International Crimes Tribunal sentenced Delwar Hossain Sayeedi, the Vice President of the Jamaat-e-Islami to death for the war crimes committed during the 1971 Bangladesh Liberation War. Following the sentence, Jamaat-e-Islami activists attacked Hindu communities across the country. Hindu properties were looted and burned down, and temples were desecrated and set on fire. While the government has held the Jamaat-e-Islami responsible for the attacks on the minorities, the Jamaat-e-Islami leadership has denied any involvement. The minority leaders have protested the attacks and appealed for justice. The Supreme Court of Bangladesh has directed the law enforcement to start suo motu investigation into the attacks. US Ambassador to Bangladesh express concern about attack of Jamaat on Bengali Hindu community. The violence included the looting of Hindu properties and businesses, the burning of Hindu homes, and desecration and destruction of Hindu temples. According to community leaders, more than 50 Hindu temples and 1,500 Hindu homes were destroyed in 20 districts. On 5 May 2014, A mob of almost 3,000 attacked Hindu households and a temple in eastern Bangladesh after two youths from the community allegedly insulted the Islamic prophet, Muhammad on Facebook.

India

See also: Persecution of Hindus § Post-Independence India
This section needs expansion. You can help by making an edit requestadding to it . (February 2021)

In March-April 2024, a Christian church in Andhra Pradesh came to attention when a video showing that the church's footwalk tiles consisted of sacred Hindu symbols of Om and Swastika went viral on social media and sparked outrage. Following the backlash, the tiles containing those symbols were removed by the church.

On 27th August, 2024, a temple was vandalised in Hyderabad. There was a massive protest after the vandalism and there is evidence that the men who vandalised the temple were Owaisi's men.

In September 2024, stones were pelted at Ganesha idol processions in many parts of India. The police were also attacked in many places but managed to seize the swords used to attack the devotees; petrol bombs were also used to set shops on fire. In another incident, the Ganesh idol was taken from the demonstrators by the police, who then secured it in an unoccupied police van, the snaps of which went viral online, as well as in newspapers; some claimed it was, "belittling" to do so.

Malaysia

See also: Hinduism in Malaysia, 2001 Kampung Medan riots, 2009 cow head protests, HINDRAF, and 2007 HINDRAF rally

In April 2006, local authorities demolished several Hindu temples to make way for developmental projects. Their reason was that these temples were unlicensed and squatting on government land. In April and May 2006, several Hindu temples were demolished by city hall authorities in the country, accompanied by violence against Hindus. On 21 April 2006, the Malaimel Sri Selva Kaliamman Temple in Kuala Lumpur was reduced to rubble after the city hall sent in bulldozers.

The president of the Consumers Association of Subang and Shah Alam in Selangor had been helping to organise efforts to stop the local authorities in the Muslim dominated city of Shah Alam from demolishing a 107-year-old Hindu temple. The growing Islamization in Malaysia is a cause for concern to many Malaysians who follow minority religions such as Hinduism.

On 11 May 2006, armed city hall officers from Kuala Lumpur forcefully demolished part of a 60-year-old suburban temple that serves more than 1,000 Hindus. The "Hindu Rights Action Force", a coalition of several NGO's, have protested these demolitions by lodging complaints with the Malaysian Prime Minister. Many Hindu advocacy groups have protested what they allege is a systematic plan of temple cleansing in Malaysia. The official reason given by the Malaysian government has been that the temples were built "illegally". However, several of the temples are centuries old. According to a lawyer for the Hindu Rights Action Task Force, a Hindu temple is demolished in Malaysia once every three weeks.

A group of Malaysian Muslims protested against the construction of a Hindu temple in a Muslim-majority neighborhood, using a cow's head in the demonstration, sparking concerns about racial and religious tensions in the country.

Pakistan

See also: Persecution of Hindus § Pakistan 2, Decline of Hinduism in Pakistan, Sectarianism in Pakistan § Hindus, Pakistan studies, and Religious discrimination in Pakistan § Hindus

In Pakistan, Hindus are often regarded as kafirs (unbelievers) and blamed for "causing all the problems in Pakistan". On Pakistan Day, the Pakistan Army dropped leaflets in South and North Waziristan warning tribesmen about foreigners and their local supporters, using the term "Yahood Aur Hanood" (Jews and Hindus) to describe the perceived enemies. The leaflets aimed to differentiate between the war on terror and local tribes, urging vigilance against intruders. At the time of Pakistan's creation the 'hostage theory' had been espoused. According to this theory the Hindu minority in Pakistan was to be given a fair deal in Pakistan in order to ensure the protection of the Muslim minority in India.

Separate electorates for Hindus and Christians were established in 1985—a policy which was originally proposed by Islamist leader Abul A'la Maududi. Christian and Hindu leaders complained that they felt excluded from the county's political process, but the policy had strong support from Islamists.

The Muttahida Majlis-i-Amal (MMA), a coalition of Islamist political parties in Pakistan, calls for the increased Islamization of the government and society, specifically taking an anti-Hindu stance. The MMA leads the opposition in the national assembly, held a majority in the NWFP Provincial Assembly, and was part of the ruling coalition in Balochistan. However, some members of the MMA made efforts to eliminate their rhetoric against Hindus.

The public school curriculum in Pakistan was Islamized during the 1980s. The government of Pakistan claims to undertake a major revision to eliminate such teachings and to remove Islamic teaching from secular subjects. The bias in Pakistani textbooks was also documented by Y. Rosser (2003). She wrote that

"in the past few decades, social studies textbooks in Pakistan have been used as locations to articulate the hatred that Pakistani policy makers have attempted to inculcate towards their Hindu neighbours", and that as a result "in the minds of generations of Pakistanis, indoctrinated by the 'Ideology of Pakistan' are lodged fragments of hatred and suspicion."

The bias in Pakistani textbooks was studied by Rubina Saigol, K. K. Aziz, I. A. Rahman, Mubarak Ali, A. H. Nayyar, Ahmed Saleem, Y. Rosser and others.

A study by Nayyar & Salim (2003) that was conducted with 30 experts of Pakistan's education system, found that the textbooks contain statements that seek to create hate against Hindus. There was also an emphasis on Jihad, Shahadat, wars and military heroes. The study reported that the textbooks also had a lot of gender-biased stereotypes. Some of the problems in Pakistani textbooks cited in the report were:

"Insensitivity to the existing religious diversity of the nation"; "Incitement to militancy and violence, including encouragement of Jihad and Shahadat"; a "glorification of war and the use of force"; "Inaccuracies of fact and omissions that serve to substantially distort the nature and significance of actual events in our history"; "Perspectives that encourage prejudice, bigotry and discrimination towards fellow citizens, especially women and religious minorities, and other towards nations" and "Omission of concepts ... that could encourage critical self awareness among students". (Nayyar & Salim 2003). The Pakistani Curriculum document for classes K-V stated in 1995 that "at the completion of Class-V, the child should be able to "Understand Hindu-Muslim differences and the resultant need for Pakistan.

A more recent textbook which was published in Pakistan and titled A Short History of Pakistan, edited by Ishtiaq Hussain Qureshi, has been heavily criticized by academic peer-reviewers for anti-Hindu biases and prejudices that are consistent with Pakistani nationalism, where Hindus are portrayed as "villains" and Muslims as "victims" living under the "disastrous Hindu rule" and "betraying the Muslims to the British", characterizations that academic reviewers found "disquieting" and having a "warped subjectivity".

Ameer Hamza, a leader of the terrorist group Lashkar-e-Taiba, wrote a highly derogatory book about Hinduism in 1999 called "Hindu Ki Haqeeqat" ("Reality of (a) Hindu"); he was not prosecuted by the Government.

According to the Sustainable Development Policy Institute report 'Associated with the insistence on the Ideology of Pakistan has been an essential component of hate against India and the Hindus. For the upholders of the Ideology of Pakistan, the existence of Pakistan is defined only in relation to Hindus, and hence the Hindus have to be painted as negatively as possible' A 2005 report by the National Commission for Justice and Peace a non profit organization in Pakistan, found that Pakistan Studies textbooks in Pakistan have been used to articulate the hatred that Pakistani policy-makers have attempted to inculcate towards the Hindus. "Vituperative animosities legitimise military and autocratic rule, nurturing a siege mentality. Pakistan Studies textbooks are an active site to represent India as a hostile neighbour", the report stated. "The story of Pakistan's past is intentionally written to be distinct from, and often in direct contrast with, interpretations of history found in India. From the government-issued textbooks, students are taught that Hindus are backward and superstitious." Further the report stated "Textbooks reflect intentional obfuscation. Today's students, citizens of Pakistan and its future leaders are the victims of these partial truths".

An editorial in Dawn discussed a report by The Guardian noted that state-run schools, promoted extremism and bigotry. It highlighted that textbooks in Pakistani state schools propagate concepts like jihad, the inferiority of non-Muslims, and hostility towards India, which foster a bigoted and obscurantist mindset. According to a study by a US government commission, textbooks in Pakistani schools foster prejudice and intolerance of Hindus and other religious minorities, and most teachers view non-Muslims as enemies of Islam. According to historian Professor Mubarak Ali, textbook reform in Pakistan began with Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto's introduction of Pakistan Studies and Islamic Studies in 1971. General Zia-ul-Haq later intensified historical revisionism, exploiting these reforms to promote a religiously exclusive narrative, which has contributed to intolerance and extremism. The broader context includes issues with outdated and biased textbook content, with reform efforts struggling to address these problems comprehensively.

Outside Asia

Australia

In April 2024, a Hindu woman named Swastika Chandra from Sydney was banned from using the Uber app because it considered her first name (Swastika) to be offensive and related to Nazism. Swastika is a hindu symbol of divinity and spirituality, however it's perception in other parts of the world is different due to the adoption of the symbol by the Nazi Party in the early 20th century. After a period of six months, Uber exempted the ban and apologized for the misunderstanding.

Fiji

This article may be unbalanced toward certain viewpoints. Please improve the article by adding information on neglected viewpoints, or discuss the issue on the talk page. (September 2021)

By the time Fiji gained independence from colonial rule, Hindus and other Indo-Fijians constituted nearly fifty percent of the total Fijian population. Nevertheless, the colonial-era laws and the first constitution for Fiji, granted special rights to native Fijians. These laws relegated Hindus as second class citizens of Fiji without full rights. For example, it denied them property rights, such as the ability to buy or own land. Hindus and other Indo-Fijians have since then not enjoyed equal human rights as other Fijians. They can only work as tenant farmers for Fijian landlords. The difference in human rights has been a continuing source of conflict between "native" Fijians and Indo-Fijians, with native Fijians believing Fiji to be their ancestral land that only they can own, and Indo-Fijians demanding equal rights for all human beings.

Beyond land ownership, Hindus have been persecuted in the Fijian communal structure. Spike Boydell states, "the introduced the divisive and unworkable system of communal representation and communal electoral rolls. Thus, different communities were represented by their own kind. This still extends to schooling in a prevailing quasi apartheid educational system."

During the late 1990s, Fiji witnessed a series of riots by radical native Fijians against Hindus (and other Indo-Fijians). In the spring of 2000, the democratically elected Fijian government led by Prime Minister Mahendra Chaudhry, who was a Hindu, was held hostage by a group headed by George Speight. They demanded a segregated state exclusively for the native Fijians, thereby legally abolishing any human rights the Hindu inhabitants held up until then. Hindu owned shops, Hindu schools and temples were destroyed, vandalized and looted.

The Methodist Church of Fiji and Rotuma, and particularly Sitiveni Rabuka who led the 1987 coup in Fiji, called for the creation of a Christian State and endorsed forceful conversion of Hindus after a coup d'état in 1987. In 2012, Fiji Methodist Church's president, Tuikilakila Waqairatu, called for Fiji to officially declare Christianity as the state religion; the Hindu community leaders demanded that Fiji be a secular state where religion and state are separate.

United Kingdom

After the Leicester riots in October 2022, Hindu groups were set to boycott a review by Dr. Chris Allen, the review's head, because of perceived lack of impartiality.

A national report in the UK found that 51% of Hindu parents reported their children facing Anti-Hindu hate in schools, and found that schools had failed to monitor and address the issues. It also reported several cases of physical assault as well as beef being thrown at a student.

Conservative Party

In October 2018, it was reported that Conservative Party candidate for the Mayor of London Shaun Bailey had written a pamphlet, entitled No Man's Land, for the Centre for Policy Studies. In it, Bailey argued that accommodating Hindus " Britain of its community" and it is also turning the country into a "crime riddled cess pool". He also claimed that South Asians "bring their culture, their country and any problems they might have, with them" and that this was not a problem within the black community "because we've shared a religion and in many cases a language". In the pamphlet, Bailey confused the Hindu religion with the Hindi language: "You don't know what to do. You bring your children to school and they learn far more about Diwali than Christmas. I speak to the people who are from Brent and they've been having Hindi (sic) days off."

James Cleverly, the Deputy Chairman of the Conservative Party, defended Bailey and suggested that Bailey's remarks were being misconstrued. He implied that black boys were turning to crime due to exposure to other religions rather than focusing on "their own Christian culture." However, the anti-racism organization Hope Not Hate condemned Bailey's comments as "grotesque."

United States

See also: Persecution of Hindus § United States

The rise of the Indian American community in the United States has triggered some isolated attacks on them, as has been the case with many minority groups in the United States. Attacks which specifically target Hindus in the United States stem from what is often referred to as the "racialization of religion" among Americans, a process that begins when certain phenotypical features which are associated with a group and attached to race in popular discourse become associated with a particular religion or religions. The racialization of Hinduism in American perception has led Americans to perceive Hindus as belonging to a separate group and this contributes to prejudices against them.

In 2019, Swaminarayan Temple in Kentucky was vandalised. They sprayed black paint on the deity and sprayed "Jesus is the only God" on the walls. The Christian cross was also spray painted on various walls. In April 2015, a Hindu temple in north Texas was vandalised when nasty images were spray-painted on its walls. In February 2015, Hindu temples in Kent and the Seattle Metropolitan area were also vandalised.

In July 2019, a Hindu priest wearing his religious attire was physically assaulted by Sergio Gouveia in Queens, New York, just two blocks from Shiv Shakti Peeth Temple in Glen Oaks. A Senator and the New York State Attorney General have labeled it a hate crime, stating, "If someone is targeted because of religious robe and a couple of blocks from the temple where he resides, it is difficult to believe this was random." However, the New York police have not classified it as a hate crime.

Pat Robertson

In addition, anti-Hindu views have been expressed which are specifically based on misperceptions of the religion of Hinduism as well as mistaken racial perceptions. In the United States Pat Robertson has denounced Hinduism as "demonic", believing that when Hindus "feel any sort of inspiration, whether it's by a river or under a tree, on top of a hill, they figure that some God or spirit is responsible for that. And so they'll worship that tree, they'll worship that hill or they'll worship anything." His remarks were widely condemned and disputed by Indian Americans and members of many non-partisan advocacy groups. Evangelical leader Albert Mohler defended Robertson's remarks, saying "any belief system, any world view, whether it's Zen Buddhism or Hinduism or dialectical materialism for that matter, Marxism, that keeps persons captive and keeps them from coming to faith in the Lord Jesus Christ, yes, is a demonstration of satanic power."

United States Congress

Main article: Rajan Zed prayer protest

In July, 2007, The United States Senate conducted its morning prayer services with a Hindu prayer, a historical first. During the service, three disruptors, named Ante Nedlko Pavkovic, Katherine Lynn Pavkovic and Christen Renee Sugar, from the Fundamentalist Christian activist group Operation Save America protested by arguing that the Hindu prayer was "an abomination", and they also claimed that they were "Christians and Patriots". They were swiftly arrested and charged with disrupting Congress.

The event generated a storm of protest by Christian right groups in the country, with the American Family Association (AFA) opposing the prayer and carrying out a campaign to lobby senators to protest against it. Their representative attacked the proceedings as "gross idolatry". The AFA sent an "Action Alert" to its members in which it asked them to e-mail, write letters, or call their Senators and ask them to oppose the Hindu prayer, stating that it is "seeking the invocation of a non-monotheistic god." The "alert" stated that "since Hindus worship multiple gods, the prayer will be completely outside the American paradigm, flying in the face of the American motto One Nation Under God." The convocation by Zed was in fact disrupted by three protesters in the gallery reportedly shouting "this is an abomination" and other complaints.

Barry W. Lynn, executive director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, said the protest "shows the intolerance of many religious right activists. They say they want more religion in the public square, but it's clear they mean only their religion."

California Textbook Controversy

Main article: California textbook controversy over Hindu history

A controversy in the US state of California concerning the portrayal of Hinduism in history textbooks began in 2005. A protest was led by Vedic Foundation (VF) and the American Hindu Education Foundation (HEF) by complaining to the California's Curriculum Commission, saying the coverage in sixth grade history textbooks of Indian history and Hinduism was biased against Hinduism; and points of contention includes a textbook's portrayal of the caste system, the Indo-Aryan migration theory, and the status of women in Indian society as the main features of Hinduism.

The California Department of Education (CDE) initially sought to resolve the controversy by appointing Shiva Bajpai, Professor Emeritus at California State University Northridge, as a one-man committee to review revisions proposed by the groups. Michael Witzel and others revisited the proposed changed on behalf of the State Board of Education and suggested reverting some of the approved changes. In early 2006, the Hindu American Foundation sued the State Board over matters of process; the case was settled in 2009.

Dotbusters

Main article: Dotbusters

The Dotbusters was a hate group in Jersey City, New Jersey, that attacked and threatened Indian-Americans in the fall of 1987. The name originates from the bindi traditionally worn by Hindu women and girls on their forehead. In July 1987, they had a letter published in the Jersey Journal stating that they would take any means necessary to drive the Indians out of Jersey City:

I'm writing about your article during july about the abuse of Indian People. Well I'm here to state the other side. I hate them, if you had to live near them you would also. We are an organization called dot busters. We have been around for 2 years. We will go to any extreme to get Indians to move out of Jersey City. If I'm walking down the street and I see a Hindu and the setting is right, I will hit him or her. We plan some of our most extreme attacks such as breaking windows, breaking car windows, and crashing family parties. We use the phone books and look up the name Patel. Have you seen how many of them there are? Do you even live in Jersey City? Do you walk down Central avenue and experience what its like to be near them: we have and we just don't want it anymore. You said that they will have to start protecting themselves because the police cannot always be there. They will never do anything. They are a weak race physically and mentally. We are going to continue our way. We will never be stopped.

Resolutions and proclamations recognizing Hinduphobia

In April 2023, Georgia became the first state in the United States to pass a resolution condemning Hinduphobia. That same month, the city of Fremont, California issued a proclamation acknowledging that "Hindu Americans have been the targets of bullying, discrimination, hate speech, harassment, and bias-motivated crimes."

Criticism

Some academics question the usage of the term "Hinduphobia" in the West. Brian Collins found the tropes of Hinduphobia to be a popular weapon employed by the affluent Hindu diaspora in stifling critical academic discourses on Hinduism—parallels with Kansas creationists were drawn. Scholars affiliated to South Asia Scholar Activist Collective (SASAC) reject "Hinduphobia" as an ahistorical and inappropriate neologism employed by the Hindu Right in order to suppress academic inquiry into topics concerned with Hinduism, Hindutva, caste, and Indian State. While racist and anti-Hindu prejudices have been indeed observed, in their view, Hindus have not faced any entrenched systematic oppression in India or United States. The claimants of Hinduphobia were also accused of engaging in discrimination against Muslims, lower-castes, Dalits, Christians, and progressive Hindus.

See also

Notes

  1. In a discourse on the related issue of California textbook controversy, Chinnaiah Jangam (Professor of South Asian History at Carleton University) had noted that Juluri did not have any academic training in history, swore by Brahminical ideology, and even wrote a book in defense of militant Hindu nationalism. Juluri rejected the charges.
  2. Collins is the Chair Professor in Indian Religion and Philosophy at Ohio University.

References

  1. Long, Jeffery D. (December 2017). "Reflections on Hinduphobia: A Perspective from a Scholar-Practitioner" (PDF). Prabuddha Bharata. 122: 797–804.
  2. Juluri, Vamsee (2020). ""Hindu nationalism" or "Hinduphobia"? : Ethnocentrism, errors, and bias in media and media studies". In Sharma, Divya (ed.). Ethics, Ethnocentrism and Social Science Research. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780429270260-8. ISBN 9780429270260. S2CID 226346622.
  3. Jangam, Chinnaiah (5 June 2015). "What Is at Stake in Rewriting California School Textbooks?". Economic and Political Weekly. 51 (29): 7–8.
  4. Juluri, Vamsee (5 June 2015). "California Textbooks Issue: A Response". Economic and Political Weekly: 7–8.
  5. "Who's afraid of dialogue?". The Hindu. 9 October 2001. Retrieved 2 June 2017.
  6. Bauman, Chad M. (2 February 2015). Pentecostals, Proselytization, and Anti-Christian Violence in Contemporary India. Oxford University Press. p. 125. ISBN 9780190266318.
  7. Bagri, Neha Thirani (8 November 2014). "Indian Muslims Lose Hope in National Secular Party". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 7 June 2017.
  8. "Politician Akbaruddin Owaisi held over 'hate speeches'". BBC News. 8 January 2013. Retrieved 8 January 2013.
  9. "Muslim preacher apologises for insulting Hinduism". Deccan Herald. 31 July 2014. Retrieved 20 June 2017.
  10. Engineer, Ashghar Ali (13–19 February 1999). "Hindu-Muslim Problem: An Approach". Economic and Political Weekly. 37 (7): 397. JSTOR 4407649.
  11. Altman, Michael (2017). Heathen, Hindoo, Hindu: American Representations of India, 1721-1893. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780190654924.
  12. Kumar, Ruchi. "The decline of Afghanistan's Hindu and Sikh communities". aljazeera.com. Retrieved 1 May 2020.
  13. Bagchi, Joymala. "Sikh Afghan Nationals Narrate Their Stories Of Fear, Suppression And Anxiety Faced In Kabul". businessworld.in. Retrieved 27 July 2020.
  14. Taliban to mark Afghan Hindus, CNN (22 May 2001).
  15. ^ Taliban to Require Identity Badges for Non-Muslims, PBS NewsHour, PBS (22 May 2001).
  16. ^ Luke Harding, Taliban defends Hindu badges plan, The Guardian (23 May 2001).
  17. ^ Jack Kelley, Taliban: Hindus must wear identity labels, USA Today (22 May 2001).
  18. Associated Press (22 May 2001). "Taliban to Enforce Hindu 'Badges.'" Wired. Retrieved 19 November 2020.
  19. Taliban drop badge policy for Hindus, United Press International (27 June 2001).
  20. Print Article - Wanted: Some Hindu spine Archived 29 April 2007 at the Wayback Machine
  21. Bangladesh opposition leader accused of hurting religious sentiment. Agence-France Press. 18 November 1996.
  22. "Amnesty International Report". Archived from the original on 18 October 2006. Retrieved 21 September 2006.
  23. Habib, Haroon (1 March 2013). "44 killed in Bangladesh violence". The Hindu. Retrieved 17 October 2024.
  24. "Bagerhat Hindu Temple Set on Fire". bdnews24.com. 2 March 2013. Archived from the original on 7 April 2013. Retrieved 20 March 2013.
  25. "US worried at violence". The Daily Star (Bangladesh). 12 March 2013. Retrieved 12 March 2013.
  26. "Mozena: Violence is not the way to resolution". The Daily Ittefaq. 11 March 2013. Archived from the original on 16 November 2014. Retrieved 12 March 2013.
  27. "Bangladesh: Wave of violent attacks against Hindu minority". Press releases. Amnesty International. Archived from the original on 9 March 2013. Retrieved 8 March 2013.
  28. Ethirajan, Anbarasan (9 March 2013). "Bangladesh minorities 'terrorised' after mob violence". BBC News. London. Retrieved 17 March 2013.
  29. "Hindu households, temple attacked in Bangladesh". Deccan Herald. Dhaka. 5 May 2014. Retrieved 27 May 2014.
  30. "Mob of 3000 people attacks Hindu households, temple in Bangladesh". DNA India. Dhaka. 5 May 2014. Retrieved 27 May 2014.
  31. "Mob of 3000 attack Hindu households, temple in Bangladesh". Firstpost. Bangladesh. 5 May 2014. Retrieved 27 May 2014.
  32. "ऊँ और स्वास्तिक के चिन्ह पर पैर रखकर चल रहे थे लोग, चर्च में नफरत वाला काम". News18 हिंदी (in Hindi). 4 April 2024. Retrieved 18 April 2024.
  33. Commune, The (5 April 2024). "Following Social Media Outcry, Pathway Leading To Church With Tiles Having Hindu Symbols Removed". The Commune. Retrieved 18 April 2024.
  34. "Deliberately hurting Hindu sentiments! Andhra Church uses 'Om' & 'Swastika' tiles for flooring". www.newsbharati.com. Retrieved 18 April 2024.
  35. "Telangana: Hyderabad Police arrests 2 men for vandalising Bhoolaxmi temple idol". mint. 27 August 2024. Retrieved 3 September 2024.
  36. Commune, The (27 August 2024). ""Do Not Dare Touch Our Temples," BJP Leader Madhavi Latha Warns Amidst Vandalism At Hyderabad's Bhoolaxmi Temple, Massive Protests And Tensions Erupt". The Commune. Retrieved 4 September 2024.
  37. "Telangana: Tensions Erupt After Temple Vandalised In Hyderabad". ABP Live. 27 August 2024. Retrieved 4 September 2024.
  38. Ansari, Nahid (15 September 2024). "Clashes erupt in UP's Mahoba after stone pelting during Ganesh idol procession". India Today. Retrieved 15 September 2024.
  39. Singh, Umesh (11 September 2024). "SP Lodha transferred following stone-pelting incident during a Ganesh idol procession in MP's Ratlam". Deccan Herald. Retrieved 15 September 2024.
  40. "Stones pelted at Ganesh pandal in Surat; 6 arrested". The Hindu. 9 September 2024. Retrieved 15 September 2024.
  41. Samachar, Gujarat (11 September 2024). "After Surat stones pelted at Ganesh Pandal in Kutch". GujaratSamachar English. Retrieved 15 September 2024.
  42. Raj, Gayathri V (11 September 2024). "Nagamangala Ganesha procession news: Stone pelting, lathi charge during procession in Karnataka's Nagamangala, Section 144 imposed". Deccan Herald. Retrieved 15 September 2024.
  43. "Ganpati idol stone pelting incident: 52 held, BJP questions arrest of Hindu devotees". English.Mathrubhumi. 12 September 2024. Retrieved 15 September 2024.
  44. "Bengaluru: Viral photo of Ganesh idol in police van sparks outrage". The Siasat Daily. 14 September 2024. Retrieved 15 September 2024.
  45. Verma, Shivam (14 September 2024). "Picture of Lord Ganesha's idol in police van sparks row in Bengaluru: Here's what we know so far". DNA India. Retrieved 15 September 2024.
  46. "Lord Ganesha murti in Bengaluru police van sparks row: PM Modi says 'in Congress-ruled Karnataka, even…'". mint. 15 September 2024. Retrieved 15 September 2024.
  47. Temple row - a dab of sensibility please,malaysiakini.com
  48. "Free domain sharing - Site not yet configured". gatago.com. Archived from the original on 4 November 2006.
  49. Pressure on multi-faith Malaysia,BBC
  50. ^ Hindu group protests 'temple cleansing' in Malaysia Archived 4 July 2007 at the Wayback Machine,Financial Express
  51. Malaysia ethnic Indians in uphill fight on religion Reuters India - 8 November 2007
  52. Malaysia Muslims protest proposed Hindu temple Associated Press - 28 August 2009
  53. "Why democracy didn't take roots in Pakistan?". kashmirherald.com.
  54. Military drops leaflets in Waziristan Archived 17 August 2007 at the Wayback Machine, jang.com.pk
  55. Zamindar, Vazira Fazila-Yacoobali (2010). The Long Partition and the Making of Modern South Asia: Refugees, Boundaries, Histories. Columbia University Press. p. 72. ISBN 9780231138475. The logic of the hostage theory tied the treatment of Muslim minorities in India to the treatment meted out to Hindus in Pakistan.
  56. Dhulipala, Venkat (2015). Creating a New Medina: State Power, Islam, and the Quest for Pakistan in Late Colonial North India. Cambridge University Press. p. 19. ISBN 9781316258385. Within the subcontinent, ML propaganda claimed that besides liberating the 'majority provinces' Muslims it would guarantee protection for Muslims who would be left behind in Hindu India. In this regard, it repeatedly stressed the hostage population theory that held that 'hostage' Hindu and Sikh minorities inside Pakistan would guarantee Hindu India's good behaviour towards its own Muslim minority.
  57. Jones, Owen Bennett (2002). Pakistan: Eye of the Storm. Yale University Press. p. 31. ISBN 0300101473. Retrieved 9 December 2014. separate electorates for minorities in pakistan.
  58. ^ International Religious Freedom Report 2006 Published by the US Department of State
  59. "Pakistan". U.S. Department of State.
  60. "Abuse of History in Pakistan: Bangladesh to Kargil". Archived from the original on 14 November 2003. Retrieved 2007-01-29., by Dr. Yvette C Rosser
  61. Lehmann, F., 1968, Pacific Affairs, University of British Columbia, pp. 644–645
  62. Calkins, P. B. Pacific Affairs, University of British Columbia, pp. 643–644, 1968
  63. Ahmed, A., Pacific Affairs, University of British Columbia, pp. 645–647, 1968
  64. "Pakistan". U.S. Department of State.
  65. Nayyar, A.H. and Salim, A. (eds.)(2003). The subtle Subversion: A report on Curricula and Textbooks in Pakistan. Report of the project A Civil Society Initiative in Curricula and Textbooks Reform. Sustainable Development Policy Institute, Islamabad.
  66. Hate mongering worries minorities, Daily Times (Pakistan), 2006-04-25
  67. In Pakistan's Public Schools, Jihad Still Part of Lesson Plan - The Muslim nation's public school texts still promote hatred and jihad, reformers say. By Paul Watson, Times Staff Writer; 18 August 2005; Los Angeles Times. 4 Page article online Retrieved on 2 January 2010
  68. Primers Of Hate - History or biology, Pakistani students get anti-India lessons in all their textbooks; 'Hindu, Enemy Of Islam' - These are extracts from government-sponsored textbooks approved by the National Curriculum Wing of the Federal Ministry of Education. Archived 7 September 2006 at the Wayback Machine By AMIR MIR; 10 October 2005; Outlook India Magazine Retrieved on 2 January 2010
  69. Noor's cure: A contrast in views; by Arindam Banerji; 16 July 2003; Rediff India Abroad Retrieved on 2 January 2010
  70. Curriculum of hatred Archived 26 May 2009 at the Wayback Machine, Dawn, 2009-05-20
  71. ‘School texts spreading more extremism than seminaries’ By Our Special Correspondent; Tuesday, 19 May 2009; Dawn. Retrieved 1 January 2010
  72. "US commission: Pakistan schools teach Hindu hatred". The Boston Globe. Associated Press. 9 November 2011. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  73. The threat of Pakistan's revisionist texts, The Guardian, 2009-05-18
  74. "A woman called Swastika got an apology from Uber after it banned her because of her name". Business Insider. Retrieved 20 April 2024.
  75. Vasil, R. K. (1972) 'Communalism and constitution-making in Fiji', in Pacific Affairs 45 (1 & 2):21-41
  76. Spike Boydell (2001), Philosophical Perceptions of Pacific Property - Land as a Communal Asset in Fiji Department of Land Management and Development, School of Social and Economic Development, University of the South Pacific
  77. "Hindus in South Asia and the Diaspora: A Survey of Human Rights 2005". Hafsite.org. Archived from the original on 12 July 2012. Retrieved 30 April 2013.
  78. FIJI 2012 INTERNATIONAL RELIGIOUS FREEDOM REPORT
  79. Fiji Hindu group rejects Christian state calls Australian Broadcasting Corporation (6 Sep 2012)
  80. Watson, Greig (29 October 2022). "Leicester disorder: Hindu groups set to boycott review". BBC News. Retrieved 1 November 2022.
  81. "Anti-Hindu Hate In Schools".
  82. "Tory London mayoral candidate claimed celebrating Hindu and Muslim festivals has turned Britain into 'cesspool of crime'". The Independent. 4 October 2018. Archived from the original on 7 May 2022. Retrieved 12 January 2021.
  83. Sonwalkar, Prasun (4 October 2018). "Anti-Hindu, Muslim views return to haunt London mayor candidate Shaun Bailey". Hindustan Times. Retrieved 4 October 2018.
  84. Sabbagh, Dan (4 October 2018). "Tory deputy chairman admits concerns about Shaun Bailey remarks". The Guardian. Retrieved 4 October 2018.
  85. Joshi, Khyati, The Racialization of Hinduism, Islam, and Sikhism in the United States, Equity & Excellence in Education, Volume 39, Number 3, August 2006, pp. 211–226(16)
  86. "Hindu temple vandalised with hate speech in US, hateful words written on walls". www.timesnownews.com. 31 January 2019. Retrieved 12 January 2021.
  87. "Hindu temple vandalised in U.S." The Hindu. PTI. 31 January 2019. ISSN 0971-751X. Retrieved 12 January 2021.
  88. "US: Hindu temple vandalized in Kentucky, deity sprayed black paint". in.news.yahoo.com. Retrieved 12 January 2021.
  89. "Community leaders rally around Hindu priest who was beaten". 23 July 2019.
  90. "State Attorney General James Calls Unprovoked Attack On Hindu Priest In Queens A Hate Crime". 23 July 2019.
  91. The 700 Club, 23 March 2006.
  92. "Using TV, Christian Pat Robertson Denounces Hinduism as "Demonic"". Archived from the original on 20 October 2009.
  93. The O'Reilly Factor, Fox News Channel. 17 March 2006.
  94. "Senate Prayer Led by Hindu Elicits Protest". The Washington Post. 13 July 2007. Archived from the original on 27 January 2020. Retrieved 19 December 2008.
  95. ^ "Christian protesters disrupt first Senate prayer by a Hindu". Boston Herald. Washington. 12 July 2007. Retrieved 20 March 2011.
  96. "A Hindu Prayer in the Senate Meets Protest". The New York Times. 13 July 2007. Retrieved 25 April 2010.
  97. A link to YouTube video on YouTube
  98. Michelle Boorstein, Hindu Groups Ask '08 Hopefuls to Criticize Protest, Washington Post (27 July 2007).
  99. A Prayer and Protest, Las Vegas Sun (13 July 2007).
  100. ^ "Hindu Prayer in Senate Disrupted." Associated Press (published on NBC News). 2007-06-12. Retrieved on 2007-06-15
  101. "ActionAlert: Hindu to open Senate with prayer". American Family Association. Archived from the original on 15 July 2007.
  102. "Senate Prayer Led by Hindu Elicits Protest". washingtonpost.com.
  103. "Hindu to open Senate with prayer AFA Action Alert, July 10, 2007"
  104. flrvs. "A saffron assault abroad". Archived from the original on 20 February 2012. Retrieved 6 February 2017.
  105. ^ "Hindu groups sue California Board of Education". Rediff. Retrieved 6 February 2017.
  106. Gutierrez, Elizabeth. "THE -DOTBUSTER- ATTACKS: HATE CRIME AGAINST ASIAN INDIANS IN JERSEY CITY, NEW JERSEY" (PDF). Geography and Urban Studies Temple UniversitY Philadelphia, PA 19122. p. 30. Retrieved 17 September 2024.
  107. Marriott, Michel (12 October 1987). "In Jersey City, Indians Protest Violence". The New York Times. p. 1. Retrieved 20 March 2011.
  108. "On Common Ground: World Religions in America - The Pluralism Project".
  109. Now |, Times (1 April 2023). "Georgia legislature takes aim at attacks on Hinduism, passes resolution against Hinduphobia". The Economic Times. Retrieved 4 August 2023.
  110. "Georgia passes resolution condemning Hinduphobia, becomes first US state to do so". ANI News. 1 April 2023. Retrieved 17 September 2024.
  111. "The resolution was initiated by representatives of Forsyth County as part of Hindu Advocacy Day!". Coalition of Hindus of North America. Retrieved 17 September 2024.
  112. April 18, 2023 City Council Meeting, retrieved 4 August 2023
  113. Collins, Brian (2014). "Introduction". The Head Beneath the Altar: Hindu Mythology and the Critique of Sacrifice. Michigan State University Press. pp. 26–28. ISBN 978-1-61186-116-7. JSTOR 10.14321/j.ctt7zt5hc.4.
  114. "Hindutva's threat to academic freedom". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved 10 July 2021.
  115. Prakash, Priyali (10 July 2021). "'Targeted by hate': Audrey Truschke on why she helped write a 'Hindutva Harassment Field Manual'". Scroll.in. Retrieved 10 July 2021.
  116. ^ "Bad Faith Bias Claims". Hindutva Harassment Field Manual. Retrieved 10 July 2021.
  117. ^ "Glossary". Hindutva Harassment Field Manual. Retrieved 10 July 2021.

Sources

  • Long, Jeffery D. (2011), Historical Dictionary of Hinduism, Scarecrow Press

Further reading

External links

Hinduism topics
Philosophy
Concepts
Schools
Hindu "Om" symbol
Texts
Classification
Vedas
Divisions
Upanishads
Upavedas
Vedanga
Other
Sangam literature
Deities
Gods
Goddesses
Practices
Worship
Sanskaras
Varnashrama
Festivals
Other
Related
Outline
Religious persecution and discrimination
By group
Methods
Events
icon Religion
Theology
Conceptions of God
Theism
Forms
Concepts
Singular god
theologies
By faith
Concepts
God as
Trinitarianism
Eschatology
By religion
Feminist
Other concepts
Names of God in
By faith
Christian
Hindu
Islamic
Jewish
Pagan
Religion portal
Discrimination
Forms
Attributes
Social
Religious
Ethnic/National
Manifestations
Discriminatory
policies
Countermeasures
Related topics
Categories: