Revision as of 07:38, 15 December 2019 editWinged Blades of Godric (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers40,041 edits Adding Discretionary Sanctions Notice (blp) (Twinkle)Tag: contentious topics alert← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 02:35, 28 December 2019 edit undoMER-C (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators250,727 edits unblock denied | ||
(31 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
== December 2019 == | == December 2019 == | ||
{{checkuserblock-account|sig=] (<sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub>) 15:33, 27 December 2019 (UTC)}} | |||
] Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Misplaced Pages, as you did to ], without giving a valid reason for the removal in the ]. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been ]. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the ] for that. '' | |||
{{unblock reviewed|1) I always added anything with proper news website references. 2) I always used to engage in conversations on the article talk page before adding any disputed edit back. 3) I never broke 3 revert rule, recently I added my edit back 2-3 times because I was kind of sure about it, later when conflict continued I raised it on Dispute Resolution board instead of breaking Wiki rules. Still, I don't understand why have you blocked me, that too without giving any reason, that too indefinitely. I request you to please check. ] (]) 02:15, 28 December 2019 (UTC)|decline=You are blocked for ]. Your appeal does not address this. ] 02:35, 28 December 2019 (UTC)}}. | |||
*don't remove references just because they do not "work" for you - this is never helpful - if you don't want to fix the reference yourself then leave it for somebody who does - by removing it entirely you break the audit trail, make information less verifiable and traceable, and damage the article - see ]''<!-- Template:uw-delete2 --> <span style="font-family:Arial;font-weight:bold;color:#004d80;"> ]</span> 02:57, 13 December 2019 (UTC) | |||
::{{u|Begoon}} Thanks for letting me know about it as I was not aware that even if link is broken we should not remove it. ] (]) 03:03, 13 December 2019 (UTC) | |||
:::All you needed to do was alter a parameter, like I did , to mark the link as not currently active, yet leave the content accessible and verifiable at the archive address. --<span style="font-family:Arial;font-weight:bold;color:#004d80;"> ]</span> 03:13, 13 December 2019 (UTC) | |||
::::Got it {{u|Begoon}}. Thanks! ] (]) 03:15, 13 December 2019 (UTC) | |||
== Managing a conflict of interest == | |||
] Hello, La vérité gagne. We ] your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things ] in the page ], you may have a ] (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the ''']''' and ] for more information. We ask that you: | |||
*'''avoid editing or creating''' articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors; | |||
* '''propose changes''' on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{tl|request edit}} template); | |||
* '''disclose''' your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see ]); | |||
*'''avoid linking''' to your organization's website in other articles (see ]); | |||
*'''do your best''' to comply with Misplaced Pages's ]. | |||
In addition, you are '''required''' by the ]'s terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See ]. | |||
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.<!-- THE FOLLOWING CATEGORY SHOULD BE REMOVED IF THE USER IS BLOCKED, OR IT IS DECIDED THAT THIS USER DOES NOT HAVE A COI, OR THIS TEMPLATE HAS BEEN IN PLACE FOR A WHILE WITH NO ACTION. -->{{#ifexpr: ({{CURRENTTIMESTAMP}} - 20191213070050) < 5000000000 | ] | }}<!-- Template:uw-coi --> ]] 07:00, 13 December 2019 (UTC) | |||
:I don't have any conflict of interest. I just want Wiki to be a neutral page. If you read that article it seems totally negative. ] (]) 15:36, 14 December 2019 (UTC) | |||
==Important Notice== | |||
{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' | |||
You have shown interest in ], ], and ]. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called ] is in effect. Any administrator may impose ] on editors who do not strictly follow ], or the ], when making edits related to the topic. | |||
For additional information, please see the ] and the ] decision ]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. | |||
}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> ]] 07:38, 15 December 2019 (UTC) | |||
==Important Notice== | |||
{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' | |||
You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called ] is in effect. Any administrator may impose ] on editors who do not strictly follow ], or the ], when making edits related to the topic. | |||
For additional information, please see the ] and the ] decision ]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. | |||
}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> ]] 07:38, 15 December 2019 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 02:35, 28 December 2019
Welcome!
Hello, La vérité gagne, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Misplaced Pages
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
You may also want to complete the Misplaced Pages Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Misplaced Pages. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Begoon 02:56, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
December 2019
Misplaced Pages's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped. Ivanvector (/Edits) 15:33, 27 December 2019 (UTC) This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
La vérité gagne (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
1) I always added anything with proper news website references. 2) I always used to engage in conversations on the article talk page before adding any disputed edit back. 3) I never broke 3 revert rule, recently I added my edit back 2-3 times because I was kind of sure about it, later when conflict continued I raised it on Dispute Resolution board instead of breaking Wiki rules. Still, I don't understand why have you blocked me, that too without giving any reason, that too indefinitely. I request you to please check. La vérité gagne (talk) 02:15, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You are blocked for sockpuppetry. Your appeal does not address this. MER-C 02:35, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
.