Misplaced Pages

Dalit Buddhist movement: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:45, 9 December 2006 editPhilKnight (talk | contribs)Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators125,353 editsm remove tagged sentence, plus {{who}} tag← Previous edit Latest revision as of 11:24, 19 December 2024 edit undoCallmehelper (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users656 editsNo edit summaryTags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit 
(916 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short_description|Modern sociopolitical movement among Dalits}}
{{toofewopinions}}
{{Use British English|date = February 2019}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=March 2020}}
], ].]]
{{Buddhism}} {{Buddhism}}
The '''Dalit Buddhist movement''' (also known as the '''Neo-Buddhist movement''', '''Buddhist movement for Dalits''', '''Ambedkarite Buddhist movement''' and '''Modern Buddhist movement'''<ref>{{cite book |author1=Ranjit Kumar De |author2=Uttara Shastree |title=Religious Converts in India: Socio-political Study of Neo-Buddhists |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=yYInC70BSEgC&pg=PA10 |year=1996 |publisher=Mittal Publications |isbn=978-81-7099-629-3 |page=10 }}</ref>) is a religious as well as a socio-political movement among ]s in India which was started by ]. He re-interpreted ] and created a new ] called ]. The movement has sought to be a ].<ref name="Robinson2003p192">{{cite book|author=Gary Tartakov|editor=Rowena Robinson|title=Religious Conversion in India: Modes, Motivations, and Meanings |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=eNsoAAAAYAAJ |year=2003|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-19-566329-7|pages=192–213}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|author=Christopher Queen|editor=Steven M. Emmanuel|title=A Companion to Buddhist Philosophy|url= https://books.google.com/books?id=P_lmCgAAQBAJ |year= 2015|publisher= John Wiley & Sons|isbn= 978-1-119-14466-3|pages=524–525}}</ref>
The Dalit Buddhist movement in India began with support of ] Buddhist monks. It received an impetus with ]'s call for conversion of ]s to Buddhism.


The movement was launched in 1956 by Ambedkar when nearly half a million Dalits – formerly ] – joined him and converted to Navayana Buddhism.<ref name=omvedt2/> It rejected Hinduism, challenged the caste system in India and promoted the rights of the Dalit community.<ref name=skaria450/><ref name=omvedt2>Omvedt, Gail. Buddhism in India : Challenging Brahmanism and Caste. 3rd ed. London/New Delhi/Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2003. pages: 2–15, 210–213</ref> The movement also rejected the teachings of ], ] and ] traditions of Buddhism; instead, the movement claims to be a form of ] as taught by Ambedkar.<ref>{{cite book|title=Political Ideas in Modern India: thematic explorations |author1=Thomas Pantham |author2=Vrajendra Raj Mehta |author3=Vrajendra Raj Mehta |year= 2006|publisher=Sage Publications|isbn=0-7619-3420-0|url= https://books.google.com/books?id=KJejtAaonsEC&q=%22Self-respect+movement%22&pg=PA48}}</ref><ref name=queen524>{{cite book|author=Christopher Queen|editor=Steven M. Emmanuel|title=A Companion to Buddhist Philosophy|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=P_lmCgAAQBAJ |year=2015|publisher=John Wiley & Sons|isbn=978-1-119-14466-3|pages=524–529}}</ref><ref name=skaria450>{{cite journal | last=Skaria | first=A | title=Ambedkar, Marx and the Buddhist Question | journal= Journal of South Asian Studies | publisher=Taylor & Francis | volume=38 | issue=3 | year=2015 | doi=10.1080/00856401.2015.1049726 | pages=450–452| doi-access=free }}, Quote: "Here there is not only a criticism of religion (most of all, Hinduism, but also prior traditions of Buddhism), but also of secularism, and that criticism is articulated moreover as a religion."</ref>
==Origins==


== History ==
The Buddhist revival began in India in ], when the ] Buddhist leader ] founded the ]<ref>{{cite book
Buddhism originated in ancient India and grew after ] adopted it. By the 2nd century CE, Buddhism was widespread in India and had expanded outside of India into Central Asia, East Asia and parts of Southeast Asia.<ref>{{cite book|author=Jason Neelis |title=Early Buddhist Transmission and Trade Networks: Mobility and Exchange Within and Beyond the Northwestern Borderlands of South Asia |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=GB-JV2eOr2UC |year=2010|publisher=BRILL Academic |isbn=978-90-04-18159-5 |pages=102–106 }}</ref><ref>{{cite book|author1=Ann Heirman |author2=Stephan Peter Bumbacher |title=The Spread of Buddhism |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=kr_M1e7yImoC |year=2007|publisher=BRILL Academic |isbn=978-90-04-15830-6|pages=139–142 }}</ref> During the Middle Ages, Buddhism slowly declined in India,<ref>{{cite book|author=Andrew Powell |title=Living Buddhism |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=6XO-qSUMphgC |year=1989|publisher=University of California Press |isbn=978-0-520-20410-2 |pages=38–39}}</ref> while it vanished from Persia and Central Asia as Islam became the state religion.<ref name=larsfogelin6>{{cite book|author=Lars Fogelin |title=An Archaeological History of Indian Buddhism |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=yPZzBgAAQBAJ |year=2015|publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-994823-9 |pages=6–11, 218, 229–230}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | author=Sheila Canby | title=Depictions of Buddha Sakyamuni in the Jami al-Tavarikh and the Majma al-Tavarikh | journal=Muqarnas | volume=10 | year=1993 | pages=299–310 | doi=10.2307/1523195 | jstor=1523195 }}</ref>
|last=Ahir
|first=D.C.
|title=Buddhism in Modern India
|year=1991
|publisher=Satguru
|id=ISBN 81-7030-254-4
}}</ref>. However, the Maha Bodhi Society mainly attracted upper-caste people<ref name="bhagwan_das_revival">{{cite book
|last=Das
|first=Bhagwan
|title=Revival of Buddhism in India. Role of Dr Baba Sahib B.R.Ambedkar.
|year=1998
|publisher=Dalit Today Prakashan, Lucknow
|id=ISBN 81-7030-254-4
}}</ref>.


According to Randall Collins, Buddhism was already declining in India by the 12th century, but with the pillage by Muslim invaders it nearly became extinct in India.<ref name=randallcollins184>Randall Collins, ''The Sociology of Philosophies: A Global Theory of Intellectual Change.'' Harvard University Press, 2000, pages 184–185</ref> In the 13th century, states Craig Lockard, Buddhist monks in India fled to Tibet to escape Islamic persecution,<ref>{{cite book|author=Craig Lockard|title=Societies, Networks, and Transitions: Volume I: A Global History|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=yJPlCpzOY_QC |year=2007|publisher=University of Wisconsin Press |isbn=978-0-618-38612-3 |pages=364 }}</ref> while the monks in western India, states Peter Harvey, escaped persecution by moving to south Indian Hindu kingdoms that were able to resist the Muslim power.<ref>{{cite book|author=Peter Harvey|title=An Introduction to Buddhism: Teachings, History and Practices|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=u0sg9LV_rEgC&pg=PA194 |year=2013|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=978-0-521-85942-4 |pages=194–195 }}</ref>
===South India===
In 1890, Pandit C. Ayodhya Dasa (1845-1914), better known as ] founded the Sakya Buddhist Society (also known as Indian Buddhist Association). The first president of the Indian Buddhist Association was the German born American Paul Carus, who wrote ''The Gospel of Buddha'' (1894).


Efforts to revive Buddhism in India began in the 19th century, such as with the efforts of ]n Buddhist leader ] who founded the ].<ref>{{cite book |last=Ahir |first=D.C. |title=Buddhism in Modern India |year=1991 |publisher=Satguru |isbn=81-7030-254-4}}</ref> The Maha Bodhi Society, according to Bhagwan Das, was not a Dalit movement however, because it mainly attracted upper-caste Hindus to Buddhism.<ref name="bhagwan_das_revival">{{Cite book |last=Das |first=Bhagwan | title=Revival of Buddhism in India. Role of Dr Baba Sahib B.R.Ambedkar |year=1998 |publisher=Dalit Today Prakashan | location=Lucknow |isbn=81-7030-254-4}}</ref>
Thass, a Tamil Siddha physician, was the pioneer of the ] ] movement. He argued that Tamil Dalits were originally Buddhists. He led a delegation of prominent Dalits to ] and asked him for his help in reestablishment of "Tamil Buddhism". Olcott helped Thass to visit Sri Lanka, where he received '']'' from ] Sumangala Nayake. After returning to India, Thass established the ''Sakya Buddhist Society'' in ] with branches in many places including ]<ref>{{cite book
|last=Geetha
|first=V.
|title=Towards a Non Brahmin Millenium - From Iyothee Thass to Periyar
|year=2001
|publisher=Bhatkal & Sen,India
|id=ISBN 81-8560-437-1
}}</ref>. He started a weekly magazine called ''Oru Paisa Tamizhan'' ("One Paisa Tamilian") from Chennai in 1907, which served as a newsletter linking all the new branches of the Sakya Buddhist Society. The magazine discussed traditions and practices of Tamil buddhism, new developments in the Buddhist world, and the Indian subcontinent's history from the Buddhist point of view, etc.


===Northern India===
Brahmananda Reddy, a Dalit leader of ], was also fascinated by Buddhism.


The two Adi Dharma movements<ref name="Teltumbde2016p59">{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ZCIlDwAAQBAJ|title=Dalits: Past, Present and Future|author=Anand Teltumbde|publisher=Taylor & Francis|year=2016|isbn=978-1-315-52644-7|pages=59–61}}</ref> – those that rejected ] in favor of ] – were launched by the ] in ] and ] in ].
===Uttar Pradesh===
In early 20th century, the ] of Bengal had established ]s in cities such as ], ], ] and ]<ref name="bhagwan_das_revival"/>.


Born in an untouchable family, Achhutanand joined the ] ''suddhi'' reform movement and worked there for about eight years (1905–1912). He felt Arya Samaj practiced untouchability in subtle ways,{{clarify|date=October 2023}} and subsequently left it to launch the socio-political Bharitiya Achhut Mahasabha movement.<ref name="Teltumbde2016p59"/> Achhutanand published the Adi-Hindu magazine, wherein he called on Dalits to return to ] as the "original religion of Indians." Achhutanand formulated his philosophy on the basis of a shared cultural and ethnic identity. He presented it to an audience beyond just Dalits, including tribal societies as well. He opposed ]'s non-cooperation movement and fasts as well as the ], stating that ]s were "as foreign to India as were the British", according to ].<ref name="Teltumbde2016p59"/>
In ], Bodhanand Mahastavir (1874-1952) advocated Buddhism to Dalits. Born Mukund Prakash in a Bengali Brahmin family, he shifted to ] with his aunt, after being orphaned at a young age. He was initially attracted to ], but became a Buddhist after a meeting with Buddhists monks from Ceylon at a Theosophical Conference in Benares. He later shifted to Lucknow and got in touch with ], who were employed as cooks, mainly by British. In 1914, he got ordained in Calcutta in presence of Kripasaran Mahasthvir. He started preaching Buddhism in Lucknow. He founded the ''Bharatiye Buddh Samiti'' in 1916, and set up a vihara in 1928. In his book ''Mula Bharatavasi Aur Arya'' ("Original Inhabitants and Aryans"), Mahastavir stated that the ]s were the original inhabitants of India, who were enslaved by the Aryans<ref name="maren_roots">{{cite web
|title=Roots of Ambedkar Buddhism in Kanpur
|url=http://www.maren-bellwinkel.de/artikel/ambedkarbuddhism.pdf
|author=Maren Bellwinkel-Schempp
|year=2004
}}</ref>.


Babu Mangu Ram was also born in an untouchable family of ] with a flourishing leather trade. Mangu Ram arrived in the ] in 1909 at the age of 23 and worked in ]. There, he joined the ] and smuggled weapons from California to India in order to oppose British rule.<ref name="Teltumbde2016p59"/> In 1925, he shifted his focus onto Dalit freedom, launching the "Ad Dharm" movement as well as a weekly newspaper titled Adi-Danka to spread his ideas. According to Teltumbde, Mandu Ram's religious movement failed to materialize, and Mangu Ram later joined the Ambedkarite movement.<ref name="Teltumbde2016p59"/>
Bodhanand Mahastavir wrote another book on Buddhist rituals called ''Baudha Dvicharya''. His associate, Chandrika Prasad Jigyasu, founded the ''Bahujan Kalyan Prakashan''. The two co-authored a book on the life and teaching of the Buddha.


In 1914, Prakash was ordained as a Bodhanand Mahastavir in ], and began preaching Buddhism in ]. He founded the ''Bharatiye Buddh Samiti'' in 1916, and set up a vihara in 1928.<ref name="maren_roots">{{Cite book|last=Bellwinkel-Schempp|first=Maren|chapter=Roots of Ambedkar Buddhism in Kanpur|editor-last=Jondhale|editor-first=Surendra|editor2-last=Beltz|editor2-first=Johannes|title=Reconstructing the World: B.R. Ambedkar and Buddhism in India|location=New Delhi|publisher=Oxford University Press|year=2004|pages=221–244|url=http://www.maren-bellwinkel.de/artikel/ambedkarbuddhism.pdf|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120801180947/http://www.maren-bellwinkel.de/artikel/ambedkarbuddhism.pdf|archive-date=1 August 2012}}</ref>
Acharya Ishvardatt Medharthi (1900-1971) of Kanpur also supported the cause of the Dalit upliftment. He had studied Pali at ] and Buddha's teachings were well known to him. He was initiated into Buddhism by Gyan Keto and Lokanath in 1937. Gyan Keto (1906-1984), born Peter Schoenfeldt was a German who arrived to Celyon in 1936 and became a Buddhist. Although Medharthi heavily criticized the ], he didn't crticize Hinduism. He claimed that the Dalits ("Adi Hindus") were the ancient rulers of India and had been trapped into slavery by the ] invaders. He also claimed that the ] was the religion of "Adi Hindus", and tried to reconcile Buddhism with the ]<ref name="maren_roots"/>.


===Southern India===
Another ] of Kanpur, Bhikshu Uttam, was a strong supporter of the ] and the ''Jat Pat Todak Mandal'', the anti-caste wing of the Arya Samaj<ref name="maren_roots"/>.
In 1898, Pandit ] founded the Sakya Buddhist Society also known as Indian Buddhist Association in ].<ref name="Teltumbde2016p57"/> He presented Buddhism as a religious alternative to Hinduism for Dalits. Thass's efforts led to the creation of a broader movement amongst Tamil Dalits in South India until the 1950s.<ref name="maren_roots"/> The first president of the Indian Buddhist Association was ].<ref name="maren_roots"/> Unlike the ], the Indian Buddhist Association adopted the ] tradition founded in ] (where Thass had received his training and initiation in Buddhism).<ref name="Teltumbde2016p57">{{cite book|author=Anand Teltumbde|title=Dalits: Past, Present and Future|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ZCIlDwAAQBAJ | year= 2016|publisher= Taylor & Francis|isbn= 978-1-315-52644-7|pages= 57–59}}</ref>


==B R Ambedkar== ==B. R. Ambedkar==
], ], on 13 October 1935]]


Ambedkar was an Indian leader, influential during the colonial era and ] period of India. He belonged to a ] community, traditionally the most oppressed and marginalized group in Indian society. He was the fourteenth child in an impoverished ] Dalit family, who studied abroad, returned to India in the 1920s and joined the political movement. His focus was social and political rights of the Dalits.<ref name="Buswell2013p34"/>
At the ] conference in 1935, prominent Dalit leader ] declared that he will not die a Hindu as it perpetuates ] injustices. Ambedkar was approached by various leaders of different denominations and faiths. Meetings were held to discuss the question of Dalit religion and the pros and cons of conversion<ref name="maren_roots"/>. On ], ], an "All Religious Conference" was held at ]. It was attended by prominent Dalit leaders including ], though Ambedkar could not attend it. At the conference, Muslim, Christian, Sikh, and Buddhist representatives presented the tenets of their respective religions in an effort to win over Dalits<ref name="maren_roots"/>.


During 1931–32, the ] led Indian independence movement held discussions with the British government over the ]. They sought constitutional reforms as a preparation to the end of colonial British rule, and begin the self-rule by Indians.<ref name="Muldoon92"/> The British side sought reforms that would keep the Indian subcontinent as a colony. The British negotiators proposed constitutional reforms on a British Dominion model that established separate electorates based on religious and social divisions.<ref>{{cite book|author=Rajmohan Gandhi|title=Gandhi: The Man, His People, and the Empire|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=FauJL7LKXmkC|year=2006|publisher=University of California Press|isbn=978-0-520-25570-8|pages=332–333}}</ref> They invited Indian religious leaders, such as ] and ], to press their demands along religious lines, as well as ] as the representative leader of the ]<ref name="Muldoon92">{{cite book|author=Andrew Muldoon|title=Empire, Politics and the Creation of the 1935 India Act: Last Act of the Raj|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=D1gfDAAAQBAJ |year=2016|publisher=Routledge|isbn=978-1-317-14431-1|pages=92–99}}</ref> Gandhi vehemently opposed a constitution that enshrined rights or representations based on communal divisions, because he feared that such a constitution would not bring people together but divide them, perpetuate their status and divert the attention from India's struggle to end the colonial rule.<ref>{{cite book|author=Andrew Muldoon|title=Empire, Politics and the Creation of the 1935 India Act: Last Act of the Raj|url= https://books.google.com/books?id=D1gfDAAAQBAJ |year= 2016|publisher= Routledge|isbn=978-1-317-14431-1|page= 97}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|author=Judith Margaret Brown|title=Gandhi: Prisoner of Hope|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=boDAE8MLAJMC|year=1991|publisher=Yale University Press|isbn=978-0-300-05125-4|pages=252–257}}</ref>
A Buddhist monk Lokanath visited Ambedkar's residence at ] on ], ] and tried to persuade him to embrace Buddhism. Lokanath, born as Salvatore, was an American of Italian descent who had settled in Ceylon. Later in an interview to the Press, Loknath said that Ambedkar was impressed with Buddhism and that his own ambition was to convert all Harijans to Buddhism<ref>{{cite book
|last=Keer
|first=Dhananjay
|title=Dr Ambedkar Life and Mission
|year=1990
|publisher=Popular Prakashan, Bombay
|id=ISBN 81-8560-437-1
}}</ref>. In 1937, Loknath published a pamphlet ''Buddhism Will Make You Free'', dedicated to the Depressed Classes of India from his press in Ceylon.


After Gandhi returned from Second Round Table conference, he started a new '']''. He was immediately arrested and imprisoned at the ], Pune. While he was in prison, the British government enacted a new law that granted untouchables a separate electorate. It came to be known as the ].<ref>{{cite book|author=Arthur Herman|title=Gandhi & Churchill: The Epic Rivalry that Destroyed an Empire and Forged Our Age|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=tquxD6dk914C|year=2008|publisher=Random House|isbn=978-0-553-90504-5|pages=382–390}}</ref> In protest, Gandhi started fast-unto-death, while he was held in prison.<ref name="Dirks2011p267">{{cite book|author=Nicholas B. Dirks|title=Castes of Mind: Colonialism and the Making of Modern India|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=UP7vmkFSJhIC&pg=PA268|year=2011|publisher=Princeton University Press|isbn=978-1-4008-4094-6|pages=267–274}}</ref> The resulting public outcry forced the government, in consultations with Ambedkar, to replace the Communal Award with a compromise ].<ref name=yer>{{cite book |title=Gandhi's Coolie: Life & Times of Ramkrishna Bajaj|author=Kamath, M. V. |publisher=Allied Publishers|year=1995|isbn=8170234875 |page= 24|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=7bRZgojbsPsC&pg=PA24}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|editor1=Rachel Fell McDermott|editor2=Leonard A. Gordon|editor3=Ainslie T. Embree|editor4=Frances W. Pritchett|editor5=Dennis Dalton|title=Sources of Indian Traditions: Modern India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=w8qJAwAAQBAJ |year=2014|publisher=Columbia University Press|isbn=978-0-231-51092-9|pages=369–370|volume=2|edition=3rd}}</ref>
In early ], Ambedkar visited Acharya Ishvardatt Medharthi's Buddhpuri school in Kanpur. Medharthi had earlier been initiated into Buddhism by Loknath, and by the mid-1940s, he had close contacts with Ambedkar. For a short while, Ambedkar also took Pali classes from Medharthi in ]<ref name="maren_roots"/>.


Ambedkar accepted the Poona Pact under public pressure, but disagreed with Gandhi and his political methods. He dismissed Gandhi's ideas as loved by "blind Hindu devotees", primitive, influenced by spurious brew of Tolstoy and Ruskin, and "there is always some simpleton to preach them".<ref name="Herman2008p586">{{cite book|author=Arthur Herman|title=Gandhi & Churchill: The Epic Rivalry that Destroyed an Empire and Forged Our Age|url= https://books.google.com/books?id=tquxD6dk914C|year=2008|publisher=Random House|isbn=978-0-553-90504-5|page= 586|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140913065817/http://books.google.com/books?id=tquxD6dk914C|archive-date=13 September 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | last=Cháirez-Garza | first=Jesús Francisco | title=Touching space: Ambedkar on the spatial features of untouchability | journal=Contemporary South Asia | publisher=Taylor & Francis | volume=22 | issue=1 | date=2 January 2014 | doi=10.1080/09584935.2013.870978 | pages=37–50| s2cid=145020542 }}</ref>
Bodhananda Mahastvir and ] first met in 1926, at the "Indian Non-Brahmin Conference" convened by ]. They met on two more occasions and for a short while in the ], where they discussed dhamma. Mahastvir was anti-Brahmin and objected to Dr Ambedkar's second marriage because his wife was a Brahmin. Later, his followers actively participated in Ambedkar's Republican Party of India<ref name="maren_roots"/>.


Ambedkar concluded that Dalits must leave Hinduism and convert to another religion, and announced his intent to leave Hinduism in 1935. He considered Islam, Christianity, Sikhism, Zoroastrianism and Buddhism.<ref name="Buswell2013p34"/><ref name="KeownPrebish2013p24"/><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.dnaindia.com/analysis/comment-the-chance-the-parsis-missed-1184909|title=The chance the Parsis missed|date=21 August 2008|work=dna|access-date=23 June 2018|language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|author1=Damien Keown|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=NFpcAgAAQBAJ|title=Encyclopedia of Buddhism|author2=Charles S. Prebish|publisher=Routledge|year=2013|isbn=978-1-136-98588-1|pages=24–26}}</ref> Ambedkar was approached by various leaders of different denominations and faiths. On 22 May 1936, an "All Religious Conference" was held at ]. It was attended by prominent Dalit leaders including ], though Ambedkar could not attend it. At the conference, Muslim, Christian, Sikh, and Buddhist representatives presented the tenets of their respective religions in an effort to win over Dalits.<ref name="maren_roots"/> Ambedkar rejected the other religions and chose Buddhism.<ref name="Buswell2013p34"/> However, Ambedkar remained a Hindu for the next 20 years, studied then re-interpreted Buddhism, and adopted Neo-Buddhism or Navayana few weeks before his death.<ref name=queen524/><ref name="Buswell2013p34"/>
==Ambedkar's conversion==
After publishing a series of books and articles arguing that Buddhism was the only way for the Untouchables to gain equality, Ambedkar publicly converted on ], ] in ]. He took the ] and ] from a Buddhist monk, Bhadant U Chandramani, in the traditional manner and then in his turn administered them to the 380,000 of his followers that were present. The conversion ceremony was attended by Medharthi, his main disciple Bhoj Dev Mudit, and Mahastvir Bodhanand's Sri Lankan successor, Bhante Pragyanand<ref name="maren_roots"/>. Ambedkar would die less than two months later, just after finishing his definitive work on Buddhism.


The Italian Buddhist monk ] visited Ambedkar's residence at ] on 10 June 1936. Later in an interview to the press, Lokanatha said that Ambedkar was impressed with Buddhism.<ref>{{cite book|last=Keer|first=Dhananjay|title=Dr Ambedkar Life and Mission|year=1990|publisher=Popular Prakashan, Bombay| isbn= 81-85604-37-1}}</ref>
Many Dalits employ the term "Ambedkar(ite) Buddhism" to designate the Buddhist movement, which started with Ambedkar's conversion<ref name="maren_roots"/>.


===22 Vows of Ambedkar=== ===Navayana Buddhism===
{{main|Navayana}}
According to Ambedkar, several of the core beliefs and doctrines of traditional Buddhist traditions such as the ] and ] were flawed and pessimistic, and may have been inserted into the Buddhist scriptures by wrong-headed Buddhist monks of a later era. These should not be considered as ]'s teachings in Ambedkar's view.<ref name="KeownPrebish2013p24"/><ref name="Jacobsen2015p361">{{cite book|author=Eleanor Zelliot|author-link=Eleanor Zelliot|editor=Knut A. Jacobsen|title=Routledge Handbook of Contemporary India|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=tPBWCgAAQBAJ| year=2015 |publisher= Taylor & Francis|isbn =978-1-317-40357-9|pages= 13, 361–370}}</ref> Other foundational concepts of Buddhism such as ] and Rebirth were considered by Ambedkar as superstitions.<ref name="KeownPrebish2013p24"/>


Navayana as formulated by Ambedkar and at the root of Dalit Buddhist movement abandons mainstream traditional Buddhist practices and precepts such as the institution of monk after renunciation, ideas such as karma, rebirth in afterlife, samsara, meditation, ] and Four Noble Truths.<ref>{{cite book|author1=Damien Keown|author2=Charles S. Prebish|title= Encyclopedia of Buddhism |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=NFpcAgAAQBAJ |year= 2013 |publisher= Routledge|isbn= 978-1-136-98588-1|page=25}}, Quote: "(...)The Buddhism upon which he settled and about which he wrote in ''The Buddha and His Dhamma'' was, in many respects, unlike any form of Buddhism that had hitherto arisen within the tradition. Gone, for instance, were the doctrines of karma and rebirth, the traditional emphasis on renunciation of the world, the practice of meditation, and the experience of enlightenment. Gone too were any teachings that implied the existence of a trans-empirical realm (...). Most jarring, perhaps, especially among more traditional Buddhists, was the absence of the Four Noble Truths, which Ambedkar regarded as the invention of wrong-headed monks".</ref> Ambedkar's new sect of Buddhism rejected these ideas and re-interpreted the Buddha's religion in terms of ] and social equality.<ref name="Jacobsen2015p361"/><ref name="KeownPrebish2013p24">{{cite book|author1=Damien Keown|author2=Charles S. Prebish|title= Encyclopedia of Buddhism |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=NFpcAgAAQBAJ |year=2013 |publisher= Routledge|isbn= 978-1-136-98588-1|pages= 24–26}}</ref><ref name=blackburn1>Anne M. Blackburn (1993), , The Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 16 (1), 1–22</ref>
After receiving ordination, Ambedkar gave ''] ]'' to his followers. The ceremony included 22 vows given to all new converts after Three Jewels and Five Precepts. On 16th October 1956, Ambedkar performed another mass religious conversion ceremony at ]. He prescribed 22 vows to his followers:


] called his version of Buddhism ] or Neo-Buddhism.<ref>{{cite book|author= Christopher S. Queen|title= Engaged Buddhism in the West|url= https://books.google.com/books?id=S7QEAAAAYAAJ|year= 2000|publisher= Wisdom Publications|isbn= 978-0-86171-159-8|page= 23}}</ref> His book, '']'', is the holy book of Navayana or Dalit Buddhists.<ref>{{cite book|author=Christopher Queen|editor=Steven M. Emmanuel|title=A Companion to Buddhist Philosophy|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=P_lmCgAAQBAJ |year=2015|publisher=John Wiley & Sons|isbn=978-1-119-14466-3|pages=524–531}}</ref> According to Junghare, for the followers of Navyana, Ambedkar has become a deity and he is worshipped in its practice.<ref>I.Y. Junghare (1988), , Asian Folklore Studies 47 (1), 93–121, "(...) the new literature of the Mahars and their making of the Ambedkar deity for their new religion, Neo-Buddhism. (...) Song five is clearly representative of the Mahar community's respect and devotion for Ambedkar. He has become their God and they worship him as the singer sings: "We worship Bhima, too." (...) In the last song, Dr. Ambedkar is raised from a deity to a supreme deity. He is omnipresent, omnipotent, and omniscient."</ref>
# I shall have no faith in ], ] and ] nor shall I worship them.
# I shall have no faith in ] and ] who are believed to be incarnation of God nor shall I worship them.
# I shall have no faith in ], ] and other gods and goddesses of Hindus nor shall I worship them.
# I do not believe in the incarnation of God.
# I do not and shall not believe that Lord Buddha was the incarnation of Vishnu. I believe this to be sheer madness and false propaganda.
# I shall not perform '']'' nor shall I give '']''.
# I shall not act in a manner violating the principles and teachings of the Buddha.
# I shall not allow any ceremonies to be performed by ]s.
# I shall believe in the equality of man.
# I shall endeavor to establish equality.
# I shall follow the ] of the Buddha.
# I shall follow the ten '']s'' prescribed by the Buddha.
# I shall have compassion and loving kindness for all living beings and protect them.
# I shall not steal.
# I shall not tell lies.
# I shall not commit carnal sins.
# I shall not take ]s like ], ]s etc.
# I shall endeavor to follow the noble eightfold path and practice ] and loving kindness in every day life.
# I renounce ], which is harmful for humanity and impedes the advancement and development of humanity because it is based on inequality, and adopt Buddhism as my religion.
# I firmly believe the ] of the Buddha is the only true religion.
# I believe that I am having a re-birth.
# I solemnly declare and affirm that I shall hereafter lead my life according to the principles and teachings of the ] and his ].


==Dalit Buddhism movement after Ambedkar's death== ===Ambedkar's conversion===
]
After publishing a series of books and articles arguing that Buddhism was the only way for the Untouchables to gain equality, Ambedkar publicly converted on 14 October 1956, at ], ], over 20 years after he declared his intent to convert. Around 365,000 of his followers converted to Buddhism at the same ceremony.<ref name=queen524/><ref name="Buswell2013p34">{{cite book|author1=Robert E. Buswell Jr.|author2=Donald S. Lopez Jr.|title=The Princeton Dictionary of Buddhism|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=DXN2AAAAQBAJ |year=2013| publisher= Princeton University Press|isbn =978-1-4008-4805-8|page=34}}</ref> On this occasion, many upper caste Hindus too accepted Buddhism. After Nagpur, on 16 October 1956, Ambedkar again gave Buddhism to more than 300,000 of his followers at ], since the place is also known as Deekshabhoomi. Inspired by this Ambedkar's conversion, 5,000 ] of ] had accepted Buddhism in ] under the leadership of ], the justice of the ] on 28 October 1956.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Mahamanav Dr. Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar|last=Gaikwad|first=Dr. Dnyanraj Kashinath|publisher=Riya Publication|year=2016|pages=341|language=mr}}</ref>


The conversion ceremony was attended by Medharathi, his main disciple Bhoj Dev Mudit, and Mahastvir Bodhanand's Sri Lankan successor, Bhante Pragyanand.<ref name="maren_roots"/> Ambedkar asked Dalits not to get entangled in the existing branches of Buddhism (Theravada, Mahayana and Vajrayana), and called his version ] or 'Neo-Buddhism'. Ambedkar would die less than two months later, just after finishing his definitive work on Buddhism.
The Buddhist movement was somewhat hindered by Dr. Ambedkar's death so shortly after his conversion. It did not receive the immediate mass support from the Untouchable population that Ambedkar had hoped for. Division and lack of direction among the leaders of the Ambedkarite movement have been an additional impediment. According to the 2001 census, there are currently 7.95 million Buddhists in India, at least 5.83 million of whom are Buddhists in Maharashtra<ref name="Census of India 2001">http://www.censusindiamaps.net/page/Religion_WhizMap1/housemap.htm</ref>. This makes Buddhism the fifth-largest ] and 6% of the population of ], but less than 1% of the overall population of India.


Many Dalits employ the term "Ambedkar(ite) Buddhism" to designate the Buddhist movement, which started with Ambedkar's conversion.<ref name="maren_roots"/> Many converted people call themselves "-Bauddha" i.e. Buddhists.
The Buddhist revival remains concentrated in two ]: Ambedkar's native ] and ], the land of Bodhanand Mahastavir, Acharya Medharthi and their associates.


===Uttar Pradesh=== ===Twenty-two vows===
{{Excerpt|Twenty-two vows of Ambedkar}}
Acharya Medharthi retired from his Buddhapuri school in 1960, and shifted to an ] in ]. He turned to the ] and conducted vedic ]s all over India. After his death, he was cremated according to Arya Samaj rites<ref name="maren_roots"/>. His Buddhpuri school became embroiled in property disputes. His follower, Bhoj Dev Mudit, converted to Buddhism in 1968 and set up a school of his own.


== After Ambedkar's death==
Rajendranath Aherwar appeared as an important Dalit leader in Kanpur. He joined the Republican Party of India and converted to Buddhism along with his whole family in 1961. In 1967, he founded the Kanpur branch of "Bharatiya Buddh Mahasabha". He held regular meetings where he preached Buddhism, officiated at Buddhist weddings and life cycle ceremonies, and organized festivals on Dr. Ambedkar's Jayanti (birth day), ], Diksha Divas (the day Ambedkar converted), and Dr Ambedkar Paranirvan Divas (the day Ambedkar died)<ref name="maren_roots"/>.
The Buddhist movement was somewhat hindered by Ambedkar's death so shortly after his conversion. It did not receive the immediate mass support from the Untouchable population that Ambedkar had hoped for. Division and lack of direction among the leaders of the Ambedkarite movement have been an additional impediment. According to the 2011 census, there are currently 8.44 million Buddhists in India, at least 6.5 million of whom are ] in Maharashtra.<ref name="Census of India 2001">{{Cite web|url=http://www.censusindiamaps.net/page/Religion_WhizMap1/housemap.htm|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20100706213221/http://www.censusindiamaps.net/page/Religion_WhizMap1/housemap.htm|url-status=dead|title=Census GIS HouseHold<!-- Bot generated title -->|archivedate=6 July 2010}}</ref> This makes Buddhism the fifth-largest ] and 6% of the population of ], but less than 1% of the overall population of India.


The Buddhist revival remains concentrated in two ]: Ambedkar's native ], and ] – the land of Bodhanand Mahastavir, Acharya Medharthi and their associates.
The Dalit Buddhist movement in Kanpur gained impetus with the arrival of Dipankar, a ] bhikkhu, in 1980. Dipankar had come to Kanpur on a Buddhist mission and his first public appearance was scheduled at a mass conversion drive in 1981. The event was organized by Rahulan Ambawadekar, an RPI Dalit leader. In April 1981, Ambawadekar founded the Dalit Panthers (U.P. Branch) inspired by the Maharashtrian Dalit Panthers. The event met with severe criticism and opposition from ] and was banned<ref name="maren_roots"/>.


===Developments in Uttar Pradesh===
In ], ], a popular out-caste political leader from a ] religious background, announced his intention to convert to Buddhism on ], ], the fiftieth anniversary of Ambedkar's conversion. He intended for 20,000,000 of his supporters to convert at the same time. Part of the significance of this plan was that Ram's followers include not only Untouchables, but persons from a variety of castes, who could significantly broaden Buddhism's support. However, he passed away ]<ref name="Indian Dalit leader passes away">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/6032563.stm</ref> on ], ] after a lengthy illness; he was cremated as per ] rituals<ref name="Kanshiram died as Buddhist">http://www.hindu.com/2006/10/10/stories/2006101003771200.htm</ref>.
]]]


] retired from his Buddhapuri school in 1960, and shifted to an ] in ]. He turned to the ] and conducted ] ]s all over India. After his death, he was cremated according to Arya Samaj rites.<ref name="maren_roots"/> His Buddhpuri school became embroiled in property disputes. His follower, Bhoj Dev Mudit, converted to Buddhism in 1968 and set up a school of his own.
Another popular Dalit leader, ] chief ], has said that she and her followers will embrace Buddhism after the BSP gains control of the government.<ref>http://www.buddhistchannel.tv/index.php?id=42,3309,0,0,1,0</ref>

Rajendranath Aherwar appeared as an important Dalit leader in Kanpur. He joined the Republican Party of India and converted to Buddhism along with his whole family in 1961. In 1967, he founded the Kanpur branch of "Bharatiya Buddh Mahasabha". He held regular meetings where he preached Buddhism, officiated at Buddhist weddings and life cycle ceremonies, and organised festivals on Ambedkar's Jayanti (birth day), ], Diksha Divas (the day Ambedkar converted), and Ambedkar Paranirvan Divas (the day Ambedkar died).<ref name="maren_roots"/>

The Dalit Buddhist movement in Kanpur gained impetus with the arrival of Dipankar, a ] bhikkhu, in 1980. Dipankar had come to Kanpur on a Buddhist mission and his first public appearance was scheduled at a mass conversion drive in 1981. The event was organised by Rahulan Ambawadekar, an RPI Dalit leader. In April 1981, Ambawadekar founded the Dalit Panthers (U.P. Branch) inspired by the Maharashtrian Dalit Panthers. The event met with severe criticism and opposition from ] and was banned.<ref name="maren_roots"/>

The number of Buddhists in the Lucknow district increased from 73 in 1951 to 4327 in 2001.<ref name="ShivShankar_Analysis">{{cite web |last=Das |first=Shiv Shankar |title=Ambedkar Buddhism in Uttar Pradesh (1951–2001): An Analysis of Demographic, Social, Economic and Political Developments |pages=56–74 |url=http://rindas.ryukoku.ac.jp/research/2011/09/09/upfile/Voices_for_Equity,%20Minority_and_Majority_in_South_Asia,%20RINDAS.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140428063753/http://rindas.ryukoku.ac.jp/research/2011/09/09/upfile/Voices_for_Equity%2C%20Minority_and_Majority_in_South_Asia%2C%20RINDAS.pdf |archive-date=28 April 2014 |work=RINDAS International Symposium Series I |publisher=Ryukoku University, Japan |access-date=3 June 2013 |url-status=dead }}</ref> According to the 2001 census, almost 70% of the Buddhist population in Uttar Pradesh is from the scheduled castes background.<ref>{{cite web|last=Das|first=Shiv Shankar|title=Buddhism in Lucknow: History and Culture From Alternative Sources|url=http://www.ambedkartimes.com/AT%20May%2016-31,%202013.pdf|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140428092735/http://www.ambedkartimes.com/AT%20May%2016-31%2C%202013.pdf|archive-date=28 April 2014|work=Ambedkar Times|access-date=25 May 2013|url-status=dead}}</ref>

In 2002, ], a popular political leader from a ] religious background, announced his intention to convert to Buddhism on 14 October 2006, the fiftieth anniversary of Ambedkar's conversion. He intended for 20,000,000 of his supporters to convert at the same time.{{Citation needed|date=September 2017}} Part of the significance of this plan was that Ram's followers include not only Untouchables, but persons from a variety of castes, who could significantly broaden Buddhism's support. But, he died 9 October 2006<ref name="Indian Dalit leader passes away">{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/6032563.stm|title=BBC NEWS – South Asia – Indian Dalit leader passes away|access-date=27 February 2015}}</ref> after a lengthy illness; he was cremated as per Buddhist tradition.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.hindu.com/2006/10/10/stories/2006101003771200.htm|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071001001756/http://www.hindu.com/2006/10/10/stories/2006101003771200.htm|url-status=dead|archive-date=1 October 2007|work=]|title=Kanshi Ram cremated as per Buddhist rituals|date=2006-10-10|access-date=27 February 2015}}</ref>

Another popular Dalit leader, Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister and ] leader ], has said that she and her followers will embrace Buddhism after the BSP forms a government at the Centre.<ref>{{cite web
| url = http://www.hindu.com/2006/10/10/stories/2006101003771200.htm
| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20071001001756/http://www.hindu.com/2006/10/10/stories/2006101003771200.htm
| url-status = dead
| archive-date = 1 October 2007
| title = Kanshi Ram cremated as per Buddhist rituals
| work = ]
| date = 10 October 2006
| access-date = 30 August 2007
}}</ref>


===Maharashtra=== ===Maharashtra===
]
Japanese-born Bhadant Nagarjun Surai Sasai is an important Buddhist leader in India. Susai came to India in 1966 and met Nichidatsu Fuji, whom he helped with the Peace Pagoda at ]. He fell out with Fuji, however, and started home, but, by his own account, was stopped by a dream in which a figure resembling ] appeared and said, "Go to Nagpur"<ref name="sasai">http://www.tomigaya.shibuya.tokyo.jp/sasai-g/sasai.html</ref>. In Nagpur, he met Wamanrao Godbole, the person who had organized the conversion ceremony for Dr. Ambedkar in 1956. Sasai claims that when he saw a photograph of Dr. Ambedkar at Godbole's home, he realized that it was Ambedkar who had appeared in his dream. At first, Nagpur folk considered Surai Sasai very strange. Then he began to greet them with "Jai Bhim" (victory to Ambedkar) and to build viharas. In 1987 a court case to deport him on the grounds that he had overstayed his ] was dismissed, and he was granted Indian citizenship. Sasai is one of the main leaders of the campaign to free the ] at Bodh Gaya from Hindu control.
Japanese-born ] emerged as an important Buddhist leader in India. Sasai came to India in 1966 and met ], whom he helped with the Peace Pagoda at ]. He fell out with Fuji, however, and started home, but, by his own account, was stopped by a dream in which a figure resembling ] appeared and said, "Go to Nagpur". In Nagpur, he met Wamanrao Godbole, the person who had organised the conversion ceremony for Ambedkar in 1956. Sasai claims that when he saw a photograph of Ambedkar at Godbole's home, he realised that it was Ambedkar who had appeared in his dream. At first, Nagpur folk considered Surai Sasai very strange. Then he began to greet them with "]" (victory to Ambedkar) and to build viharas. In 1987 a court case to deport him on the grounds that he had overstayed his ] was dismissed, and he was granted Indian citizenship. Sasai and Bhante Anand Agra are two of main leaders of the campaign to free the ] at Bodh Gaya from Hindu control.<ref>{{cite book |last=Doyle |first=Tara N.|title=Liberate the Mahabodhi Temple! Socially Engaged Buddhism, Dalit-Style. In: Steven Heine, Charles Prebish (eds), Buddhism in the Modern World|publisher=Oxford University Press|pages=249–280|date=2003|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jWhMCAAAQBAJ&q=Surai+Sasai&pg=PT339|isbn=0-19-514698-0}}</ref>

A movement originating in Maharashtra but also active in Uttar Pradesh, and spread out over quite a few other pockets where Neo Buddhists live, is Triratna Bauddha Mahāsaṅgha (formerly called TBMSG for Trailokya Bauddha Mahasangha Sahayaka Gana). It is the Indian wing of the UK-based ] founded by ]. Its roots lie in the scattered contacts that ] had in the 1950s with Ambedkar. Sangharakshita, then still a bhikshu, participated in the conversion movement from 1956 until his departure to the UK in 1963.


When his new ecumenical movement had gained enough ground in the West, Sangharakshita worked with Ambedkarites in India and the UK to develop Indian Buddhism further. After visits in the late 1970s by Dharmachari Lokamitra from UK, supporters developed a two-pronged approach: social work through the Bahujan Hitaj (also spelled as Bahujan Hitay) trust, mainly sponsored from the general public by the British Buddhist-inspired ], and direct Dharma work. Currently the movement has viharas and groups in at least 20 major areas, a couple of retreat centres, and hundreds of Indian Dharmacharis and Dharmacharinis.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.inebnetwork.org/attachments/article/73/BD+Spring+2011_Senauke.pdf|date=20 April 2012|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120420003928/http://www.inebnetwork.org/attachments/article/73/BD%20Spring%202011_Senauke.pdf|archive-date=20 April 2012|title=Ambedkar's Vision}}</ref>
In ], protests against the murder of a Dalit family in the ], and the desecration of a statue of ], wrongly blamed on upper caste Hindus, led to violent rioting by Ambedkarite Buddhists in the state, with trains set on fire, buses damaged and violent clashes with the police (see ]).


Funding for movement's social and dharma work has come from foreign countries, including the Western countries and ]. Some of the foreign-funded organisations include Trailokya Bauddha Mahasangha Sahayaka Gana<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.tbmsg.org|title=TBMSG: Trailokya Bauddha Mahasangha Sahayaka Gana|access-date=27 February 2015}}</ref> and Triratna (Europe and India). Triratna has links with the 'Ambedkarite' Buddhist ] in Hungary.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.jaibhim.hu/|title=Jai Bhim Network|website=www.jaibhim.hu|access-date=26 April 2015|archive-date=4 April 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150404134820/http://www.jaibhim.hu/|url-status=dead}}</ref>
It must be noted though, that there wasn't much friction between upper caste ]s and ] in the ], although sporadic incidents of discrimination have been recorded. Especially, the ]s, who comprise close to half the Maharashtrian population have had good relations with Marathi Dalits. Indeed, the person who helped ] pursue higher studies was ], a ] ]. However, there has been a history of animosity between lower caste Marathi Hindus like ]s (which include such castes as ]s, ]s and ]s) and ]s. In fact, the Khairlanji massacre was wrongly attributed to forward caste Maharashtrians, when it was perpetrated by a few members of the ] ] community.<ref>. ].com. Retrieved on ]-].</ref>


===Organized mass conversions=== ===Organized mass conversions===
] Stupa in ], where Ambedkar converted to Buddhism]]
Since Ambedkar's conversion, several thousand people from different castes have converted to Buddhism in ceremonies including the twenty-two vows. The ] and ] governments passed new laws in ] to ban "forced" religious conversions. These laws were later withdrawn due to heavy opposition{{cn}}.
Since Ambedkar's conversion, several thousand people from different castes have converted to Buddhism in ceremonies including the twenty-two vows.


;1957 ;1957
:In 1957, Mahastvir Bodhanand's Sri Lankan successor, Bhante Pragyanand, held a mass conversion drive for 15,000 people in Lucknow<ref name="maren_roots"/>. :In 1957, Mahastvir Bodhanand's Sri Lankan successor, Bhante Pragyanand, held a mass conversion drive for 15,000 people in Lucknow.<ref name="maren_roots"/>


;2001 ;2001
:A prominent Indian ] Buddhist leader and political activist, ], organized a large mass conversion on ], ] where he gave the 22 vows, but the event met with active opposition from the government<ref name="50,000 DALITS EMBRACE BUDDHISM">http://www.buddhismtoday.com/english/world/facts/conversion-manpreet.htm</ref>. :A prominent Indian ] Buddhist leader and political activist, ], organised a large mass conversion on 4 November 2001, where he gave the 22 vows, but the event met with active opposition from the government.<ref>{{cite web
| url = http://www.buddhismtoday.com/english/world/facts/conversion-manpreet.htm
| title = 50,000 Dalits embrace Buddhism
| publisher = Buddhism Today
| access-date = 30 August 2007
}}</ref>


;2006, Hyderabad ;2006, Hyderabad
:A report from the UK daily '']'' said that some Hindus have converted to Buddhism. ] monks from the UK and the U.S. attended the conversion ceremonies in India. In response, Hindu nationalists asserted that ] should concentrate on illiteracy and poverty rather than looking for new religions<ref name="Guardian">http://www.guardian.co.uk/india/story/0,,1922410,00.html</ref>. :A report from the UK daily '']'' said that some Hindus have converted to Buddhism. ] monks from the UK and the U.S. attended the conversion ceremonies in India. Lalit Kumar, who works for a Hindu nationalist welfare association in Andhra Pradesh, asserted that ] should concentrate on trying to reduce illiteracy and poverty rather than looking for new religions.<ref name="Guardian">, ''The Guardian''</ref>


;2006, Gulbarga ;2006, Gulbarga
On October 14, 2006 hundreds of people converted from Hinduism to Buddhism in ] (])<ref>http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/2171942.cms</ref>. :On 14 October 2006, hundreds of people converted from Hinduism to Buddhism in ] (]).<ref>, ''Times of India''</ref>


;2006
A Buddhist source claimed that "300,000 Dalits are estimated" to have converted to Buddhism as part of 50th year celebrations of Ambedkar's deeksha in 2006<ref>http://www.buddhistchannel.tv/index.php?id=42,3409,0,0,1,0</ref>. The move was criticized by Hindu groups as "unhelpful" and has been criticized as a "political stunt"<ref>http://web.archive.org/web/20030622160717/http://www.the-week.com/21nov18/events6.htm</ref>
:At 50th anniversary celebrations in 2006 of Ambedkar's deeksha.<ref>{{cite web
| url = http://www.buddhistchannel.tv/index.php?id=42,3309,0,0,1,0
| title = Prominent Indian female politician to embrace Buddhism
| publisher = The Buddhist Channel
| date = 17 October 2006
| access-date = 30 August 2007
}}</ref> Non-partisan sources put the number of attendees (not converts) at 30,000.<ref name="TheWeek">Prerna Singh Bindra ., ''The Week Magazine'', 18 November 2001.</ref> The move was criticised by Hindu groups as "unhelpful" and has been criticised as a "political stunt."<ref name="TheWeek"/>


;2007, Mumbai
===Criticism of conversions===
:On 27 May 2007, tens of thousands of Dalits from ] gathered at the Mahalakshmi racecourse in Mumbai to mark the 50th anniversary of the conversion of ]. The number of people who converted versus the number of people in attendance was not clear.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/6695695.stm|title=BBC NEWS – South Asia – Mass Dalit conversions in Mumbai|access-date=27 February 2015}}</ref> The event was organised by the ] leader ].<ref>Nithin Belle. '' {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120211195702/http://www.khaleejtimes.com/DisplayArticleNew.asp?xfile=data%2Fsubcontinent%2F2007%2FMay%2Fsubcontinent_May1097.xml&section=subcontinent&col= |date=11 February 2012 }}, ''Khaleej Times'', 28 May 2007</ref>
Hindu critics have argued that efforts to convert Hindus to Ambedkarite Buddhism are political stunts rather than sincere commitments to social reform<ref name="Week"></ref>.

===Critique===

] argued a mass-conversion of Hindus to Ambedkarite Buddhism under ] to be a political stunt.<ref name="Week">, ''The Week''</ref>


==Distinctive interpretation== ==Distinctive interpretation==
{{see also|Navayana|Buddhist modernism}}
According to ], an American-born and naturalised Indian sociologist and human rights activist:


{{cquote|Ambedkar's Buddhism seemingly differs from that of those who accepted by faith, who 'go for refuge' and accept the canon. This much is clear from its basis: it does not accept in totality the scriptures of the Theravada, the the Mahayana, or the Vajrayana. The question that is then clearly put forth: is a fourth yana, a Navayana, a kind of modernistic Enlightenment version of the Dhamma really possible within the framework of Buddhism?<ref name="Buddhism in India : Challenging Brahmanism and Caste">Omvedt, Gail. Buddhism in India : Challenging Brahmanism and Caste. 3rd ed. London/New Delhi/Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2003. pages: 8</ref>}} {{blockquote|Ambedkar's Buddhism seemingly differs from that of those who accepted by faith, who 'go for ]' and accept the canon. This much is clear from its basis: it does not accept in totality the scriptures of the Theravada, the Mahayana, or the Vajrayana. The question that is then clearly put forth: is a fourth yana, a ], a kind of modernistic Enlightenment version of the Dhamma really possible within the framework of Buddhism?<ref name="Buddhism in India: Challenging Brahmanism and Caste">Omvedt, Gail. ''Buddhism in India : Challenging Brahmanism and Caste'', 3rd ed. London/New Delhi/Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2003. pages: 8</ref>}}


According to Omvedt, Ambedkar and his Buddhist movement deny many of the core doctrines of Buddhism.<ref name=omvedt2/> All the elements of religious modernism, state Christopher Queen and Sallie King, may be found in Ambedkar Buddhism where his '']'' abandons the traditional precepts and practices, then adopts science, activism and social reforms as a form of ].<ref>{{cite book|author1=Christopher S. Queen|author2=Sallie B. King|title=Engaged Buddhism: Buddhist Liberation Movements in Asia|url= https://books.google.com/books?id=I5-tjMKJ1ykC&pg=PA65|year= 1996|publisher= State University of New York Press|isbn=978-0-7914-2843-6|pages=65–66}}</ref> Ambedkar's formulation of Buddhism is different from Western modernism, states Skaria, given his synthesis of the ideas of modern ] into the structure of ideas by the ancient Buddha.<ref>{{cite journal | last=Skaria | first=A. | title=Ambedkar, Marx and the Buddhist Question | journal= Journal of South Asian Studies | publisher=Taylor & Francis | volume=38 | issue=3 | year=2015 | doi=10.1080/00856401.2015.1049726 | pages=450–465| doi-access=free }}</ref>
Most Indian Buddhists espouse an eclectic version of Buddhism, primarily based on ], but with additional influences from ] and ]. On many subjects, they give Buddhism a distinctive interpretation. Of particular note is their emphasis on ] as a political and social reformer, rather than merely as a spiritual leader. They point out that the Buddha required his ] followers to ignore caste distinctions, and that he was critical of the social inequality that existed in his own time. Ambedkar's followers do not believe that a person's unfortunate conditions at birth are the result of previous ]. Many other Buddhists{{who}} are uncomfortable with some of the liberties Ambedkar took in re-fashioning the ] to have a direct social message.


==Criticism of the movement==
==International involvement==


Critics have argued that Neo-Buddhism does not have a strong influence, especially after the death of Ambedkar.<ref name=":8">{{Cite journal|last=VERMA|first=VIDHU|date=2010|title=Reinterpreting Buddhism: Ambedkar on the Politics of Social Action|journal=Economic and Political Weekly|volume=45|issue=49|pages=56–65|issn=0012-9976|jstor=27917939}}</ref>
===British involvement===


Some critics also argue that Neo-Buddhism deviates too much from traditional Buddhism.<ref name=":10">{{Cite journal|last=Hancock|first=Virginia|date=2013|title=New Buddhism for New Aspirations: Navayana Buddhism of Ambedkar and His Followers|url=http://www.manushi-india.org/pdfs_issues/PDF%20145/Buddhism%2017-25.pdf|journal=First Conference on Religions in the Indic Civilisation}}</ref> Even though traditional Buddhism emphasizes equality among people, it does not deny the caste system.<ref name=":10" /> In addition, its emphasis on people's liberation in the religious sense does not deny social distinctions as the norm of organizations in society, as the Buddha himself was the founder of a monastic order.<ref name=":10" /> A number of critics also argue that there is no moral foundation for the political practices that are based on Neo-Buddhist notions, since religion is totally voluntary, and Neo-Buddhism may thus violate democratic principles by restricting its followers to abide to certain non-religious rules.<ref name=":10" />
British Buddhists have played a role in revival of Buddhism in India through the work of the ], a London-based Buddhist charity set up by members of the ] and part of the FWBO. The Karuna Trust's work is inspired by Dr Ambedkar and seeks to work towards his vision of liberty, equality, fraternity and justice. Karuna's work is also inspired by ], the founder of the Western Buddhist Order, who met Dr Ambedkar in India. Sangharakshita deeply moved by the situation facing Dalit people, and addressed followers of Dr Ambedkar at mass public meetings after the latter's death.


===Navayana as a political movement===
The Karuna Trust was set up in 1980 by some of Sangharakshita's disciples to address the great material suffering and poverty experienced by millions of Dalit people across India. Through educational and training projects in India and Bangladesh, Karuna supports and enable of some of the world's most disadvantaged people, who are marginalised.
The mass conversions to Buddhism are also seen as a political stunt rather than a genuine spiritual movement.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.the-week.com/21nov18/events6.htm | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20030622160717/http://www.the-week.com/21nov18/events6.htm | archive-date=22 June 2003 | title=India Conversion: Ram Raj's rally was probably just an exercise in self-promotion, Nov 11, 2001 the Week }}</ref> Politicians such as Udit Raj, Ramdas Athawale, ] and Mayawati have also been involved in staging or planning to stage mass conversions—these politicians are members of either the ] or the ].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.rediff.com/news/2006/oct/16look.htm?zcc=rl|title=Mayawati claims Kanshi Ram's legacy|website=www.rediff.com}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://tricycle.org/trikedaily/more-dalit-mass-conversions/|title=More Dalit Mass Conversions|date=29 May 2007|website=Tricycle: The Buddhist Review}}</ref>


According to Janet Contursi, Ambedkar re-interprets Buddhist religion and with Navayana "speaks through Gautama and politicizes the Buddha philosophy as he theologizes his own political views".<ref>{{cite journal | last=Contursi | first=Janet A. | year=1993 | title=Political Theology: Text and Practice in a Dalit Panther Community | journal=The Journal of Asian Studies | publisher=Cambridge University Press | volume=52 | issue=2 | pages=320–339 | doi=10.2307/2059650 | jstor=2059650 | s2cid=162564306 }}</ref>
] (FWBO) is a Buddhist movement that was founded in the UK by Sangharakshita (formerly ]) in 1967, followed by the Western Buddhist Order in 1968. In 1978 Indian wing of the FWBO founded, known as the Trailokya Bauddha Mahasangha Sahayaka Gana.<ref>http://www.tbmsg.org/index1.html</ref>


===Japanese involvement=== ===Ambedkar's reinterpretations===
Ambedkar not only rejected Hinduism but also the most popular ]. Ambedkar considered all ideas in Theravada, Vajrayana and Mahayana Buddhism that relate to an individual's merit and spiritual development as insertions into Buddhism, and something that "cannot be accepted to be the word of the Buddha". Buddhism, to Ambedkar, must have been a social reform movement.<ref name=blackburn1/><ref name=zelliot134>{{cite book |first1=Eleanor |last1=Zelliot |first2=Joanna Rogers |last2=Macy |year=1980 |article=Tradition and innovation in contemporary Indian Buddhism |editor-first=A.K. |editor-last=Narain |title=Studies in the History of Buddhism |place=Delhi, IN |publisher=B.R. Publishing |pages=134–142}}</ref> Ambedkar's radical reinterpretations of the faith rejected many of the main tenets of mainstream Buddhism such as ], ], ], ], ] and even the ], which Ambedkar claims to have been invented by wrong-headed monks.


Ambedkar reinvents the traditional story of ] and the ] in order to try and gain mass appeal from Dalits by giving the impression that The Buddha founded Buddhism as a social reform movement rather than a spiritual movement. Virginia Hancock writes about Ambedkar's reinterpretations as turning the Buddha into a politician.
A Japanese organization called the Ogawa Trust maintains Nagarjuna Hospital at ], an English language school for poor students, an orphanage, cooperative home industries for women, and various other kinds of aid. The Ogawa Trust has also helped in the building of an ornate Buddhist temple at ], a town near Nagpur.


{{Blockquote|According to Ambedkar, the Buddha advocated a rational and peaceful resolution of an inter-tribe water conflict but was unable to gain the necessary political leverage because he lacked majority vote. He then went into exile and became a renunciant because it was the only way to prevent his tribe from going to war with their neighbors. Ambedkar omits any mention of old age, sickness, and death (the forms of suffering the Buddha is usually understood to have encountered). In this way the Buddha’s renunciation is motivated more by political exigencies rather than a desire to find the ultimate truth, and he becomes a figure not unlike a minority politician in contemporary India. The discussion of water rights was also a familiar topic after the Mahad Satyagraha. These changes, though unorthodox, create a character for the Buddha that might be easily understood by oppressed communities, specifically Dalits.<ref name=":10" />}}
===Taiwanese involvement===


Scholars broadly accept that the depictions of the Buddha as a social reformer are inaccurate.<ref name=blackburn1/><ref name=Krishan-1986>{{cite journal |first=Y. |last=Krishan |year=1986 |url=http://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/jiabs/article/download/8676/2583 |title=Buddhism and the caste system |journal=The Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies |volume=9 |issue=1 |pages=71–84}}</ref>{{efn|It has been long recognized that Buddhism and Jainism were not movements for social reform, and that the Buddha's doctrine did not aim at transformation or improvement of the social conditions.<ref name=Krishan-1986/>}} ] (2012),<ref name=gombrich345/> states that there is no evidence that the Buddha began or pursued social reforms, rather his aim was at the salvation of those who joined his monastic order.<ref name=gombrich345>{{cite book |first=Richard |last=Gombrich |author-link=Richard Gombrich |year=2012 |title=Buddhist Precept & Practice |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-136-15623-6 |pages=344–345, context and discussion: 343–370 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=lqp4LuZQnHsC}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |first=Randall |last=Collins |year=2000 |title=The Sociology of Philosophies: A global theory of intellectual change |publisher=Harvard University Press |pages=205–206}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |author1=Queen, Christopher S. |author2=King, Sallie B. |year=1996 |title=Engaged Buddhism: Buddhist Liberation Movements in Asia |publisher=State University of New York Press |isbn=978-0-7914-2844-3 |pages=17–18 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=6ZsTgY1lNNsC&pg=PA17}}</ref> Modernist interpreters of Buddhism, states Gombrich, keep picking up this "mistake from western authors", a view that initially came into vogue during the colonial era.<ref name=gombrich345/><ref>{{cite book |first=Wanda |last=Alberts |year=2007 |title=Integrative Religious Education in Europe: A study-of-religions approach |publisher=Walter de Gruyter |isbn=978-3-11-097134-7 |pages=258–259 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=xvwKWS3VKfcC&pg=PA258}}</ref><ref name="lopez84">{{cite book |author=Lopez, Donald S. Jr. |year=2009 |title=Buddhism and Science: A guide for the perplexed |pages=84–91 |publisher=University of Chicago Press |isbn=978-0-226-49324-4 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=M1rTNRb5uA4C}}</ref>
Taiwanese Buddhists have contributed to the growth of Buddhism in India in multiple ways, one of which is in the ordination of Theravadin nuns. Taiwan, with one of the most active groups of nuns in the world, has begun to facilitate the ordination of women in India. In February 1998 a full ordination ceremony was held at Bodh Gaya by Taiwan's ] Monastery. 132 applicants arrived to receive ordination as nuns and undertook a nine day period of training and questioning{{fact}}. Of these candidates 66 were from South Asia, and of these at least twenty-eight were from Maharashtra.


{{Blockquote|Richard Gombrich adds that Buddha should not be seen as a social reformer: "his concern was to reform individuals and help them leave society forever, not to reform the world... He never preached against social inequality, only declared its irrelevance to salvation. He never tried to abolish the caste system nor to do away with slavery"<ref>{{cite book | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=6ZsTgY1lNNsC&pg=PA17 | title=Engaged Buddhism: Buddhist Liberation Movements in Asia | isbn=9780791428443 | last1=Queen | first1=Christopher S. | last2=King | first2=Sallie B. | date=14 March 1996 | publisher=SUNY Press }}</ref>}}


Empirical evidence outside of India, such as in the Theravada Buddhist monasteries of the Sinhalese society, suggests that class ideas have been prevalent among the ''sangha'' monks, and between the Buddhist monks and the laity. In all canonical Buddhist texts, the ''khattiyas'' (warrior class) are always mentioned first and never other classes such as ''brahmans'', ''vessas'', ''suddas''.<ref>{{cite book |author=Gombrich, Richard |year=2012 |title=Buddhist Precept & Practice |pages=343–366 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-136-15623-6 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=lqp4LuZQnHsC}}</ref>


==See also== ==See also==
*] * ]
* '']''
*]
*] * ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]

== Notes ==
{{notelist}}


==References== ==References==
{{Reflist}}
<div class="references-small">

<references/>
==Bibliography==
</div>
* {{cite journal |author=Adele Fiske |title=Religion and Buddhism among India's New Buddhists |journal=Social Research |volume=36 |issue=1 |year=1969 |pages=123–157 }}
* {{cite book |editor1=Surendra Jondhale |editor2=Johannes Beltz |title=Reconstructing the World: B.R. Ambedkar and Buddhism in India |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=K3VuAAAAMAAJ |year=2004 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-566529-1}}
* {{cite book |author1=Trevor Ling |author2=Steven Axelrod |title=Buddhist Revival in India: Aspects of the Sociology of Buddhism |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Zq2uCwAAQBAJ |year=1980 |publisher=Palgrave Macmillan UK |isbn=978-1-349-16310-6}}
* {{cite book |last=Omvedt |first=Gail |author-link=Gail Omvedt |title=Buddhism in India: Challenging Brahmanism and Caste |edition=3rd |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=OvmHAwAAQBAJ |year=2003 |publisher=SAGE |isbn=978-81-321-0370-7}}
* {{cite book |author=Christopher S. Queen |chapter=Socially Engaged Buddhism: Emerging patterns in Theory and Practice |editor=Steven M. Emmanuel |title=A Companion to Buddhist Philosophy |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=P_lmCgAAQBAJ |year=2015 |publisher=Wiley-Blackwell |isbn=978-1-119-14466-3 |pages=524–535 }}


==External links== ==External links==
{{commons category}}
*'''', text of the book by B. R. Ambedkar
*'''', B. R. Ambedkar
* Article on India's Buddhism by ].
*
*Omvedt, Gail. Buddhism in India : Challenging Brahmanism and Caste. 3rd ed. London/New Delhi/Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2003.


{{Buddhism topics}}
'''Global organizations'''
*
*
*
*
*


{{DEFAULTSORT:Dalit Buddhist Movement}}
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
] ]

Latest revision as of 11:24, 19 December 2024

Modern sociopolitical movement among Dalits

The Buddhist Movement for Dalits was begun by Ambedkar when he converted with his followers in 1956 in Deekshabhoomi, Nagpur.
Part of a series on
Buddhism
History
Buddhist texts
Practices
Nirvāṇa
Traditions
Buddhism by country

The Dalit Buddhist movement (also known as the Neo-Buddhist movement, Buddhist movement for Dalits, Ambedkarite Buddhist movement and Modern Buddhist movement) is a religious as well as a socio-political movement among Dalits in India which was started by B. R. Ambedkar. He re-interpreted Buddhism and created a new school of Buddhism called Navayana. The movement has sought to be a socially and politically engaged form of Buddhism.

The movement was launched in 1956 by Ambedkar when nearly half a million Dalits – formerly untouchables – joined him and converted to Navayana Buddhism. It rejected Hinduism, challenged the caste system in India and promoted the rights of the Dalit community. The movement also rejected the teachings of Mahayana, Theravada and Vajrayana traditions of Buddhism; instead, the movement claims to be a form of engaged Buddhism as taught by Ambedkar.

History

Buddhism originated in ancient India and grew after Ashoka adopted it. By the 2nd century CE, Buddhism was widespread in India and had expanded outside of India into Central Asia, East Asia and parts of Southeast Asia. During the Middle Ages, Buddhism slowly declined in India, while it vanished from Persia and Central Asia as Islam became the state religion.

According to Randall Collins, Buddhism was already declining in India by the 12th century, but with the pillage by Muslim invaders it nearly became extinct in India. In the 13th century, states Craig Lockard, Buddhist monks in India fled to Tibet to escape Islamic persecution, while the monks in western India, states Peter Harvey, escaped persecution by moving to south Indian Hindu kingdoms that were able to resist the Muslim power.

Efforts to revive Buddhism in India began in the 19th century, such as with the efforts of Sri Lankan Buddhist leader Anagarika Dharmapala who founded the Maha Bodhi Society. The Maha Bodhi Society, according to Bhagwan Das, was not a Dalit movement however, because it mainly attracted upper-caste Hindus to Buddhism.

Northern India

The two Adi Dharma movements – those that rejected Hinduism in favor of Buddhism – were launched by the Swami Achhutanand Harihar in Uttar Pradesh and Babu Mangu Ram in Punjab.

Born in an untouchable family, Achhutanand joined the Arya Samaj suddhi reform movement and worked there for about eight years (1905–1912). He felt Arya Samaj practiced untouchability in subtle ways, and subsequently left it to launch the socio-political Bharitiya Achhut Mahasabha movement. Achhutanand published the Adi-Hindu magazine, wherein he called on Dalits to return to Adi-Dharma as the "original religion of Indians." Achhutanand formulated his philosophy on the basis of a shared cultural and ethnic identity. He presented it to an audience beyond just Dalits, including tribal societies as well. He opposed Mahatma Gandhi's non-cooperation movement and fasts as well as the Indian National Congress, stating that Brahmins were "as foreign to India as were the British", according to Anand Teltumbde.

Babu Mangu Ram was also born in an untouchable family of Punjab with a flourishing leather trade. Mangu Ram arrived in the United States in 1909 at the age of 23 and worked in California. There, he joined the Ghadar Party and smuggled weapons from California to India in order to oppose British rule. In 1925, he shifted his focus onto Dalit freedom, launching the "Ad Dharm" movement as well as a weekly newspaper titled Adi-Danka to spread his ideas. According to Teltumbde, Mandu Ram's religious movement failed to materialize, and Mangu Ram later joined the Ambedkarite movement.

In 1914, Prakash was ordained as a Bodhanand Mahastavir in Calcutta, and began preaching Buddhism in Lucknow. He founded the Bharatiye Buddh Samiti in 1916, and set up a vihara in 1928.

Southern India

In 1898, Pandit Iyothee Thass founded the Sakya Buddhist Society also known as Indian Buddhist Association in Tamil Nadu. He presented Buddhism as a religious alternative to Hinduism for Dalits. Thass's efforts led to the creation of a broader movement amongst Tamil Dalits in South India until the 1950s. The first president of the Indian Buddhist Association was Paul Carus. Unlike the Ambedkarite movement, the Indian Buddhist Association adopted the Theravada Buddhism tradition founded in Sri Lanka (where Thass had received his training and initiation in Buddhism).

B. R. Ambedkar

Ambedkar delivering a speech to a rally at Yeola, Nashik, on 13 October 1935

Ambedkar was an Indian leader, influential during the colonial era and post-independence period of India. He belonged to a Dalit community, traditionally the most oppressed and marginalized group in Indian society. He was the fourteenth child in an impoverished Maharashtra Dalit family, who studied abroad, returned to India in the 1920s and joined the political movement. His focus was social and political rights of the Dalits.

During 1931–32, the Mahatma Gandhi led Indian independence movement held discussions with the British government over the Round Table Conferences. They sought constitutional reforms as a preparation to the end of colonial British rule, and begin the self-rule by Indians. The British side sought reforms that would keep the Indian subcontinent as a colony. The British negotiators proposed constitutional reforms on a British Dominion model that established separate electorates based on religious and social divisions. They invited Indian religious leaders, such as Muslims and Sikhs, to press their demands along religious lines, as well as B. R. Ambedkar as the representative leader of the untouchables. Gandhi vehemently opposed a constitution that enshrined rights or representations based on communal divisions, because he feared that such a constitution would not bring people together but divide them, perpetuate their status and divert the attention from India's struggle to end the colonial rule.

After Gandhi returned from Second Round Table conference, he started a new satyagraha. He was immediately arrested and imprisoned at the Yerwada Jail, Pune. While he was in prison, the British government enacted a new law that granted untouchables a separate electorate. It came to be known as the Communal Award. In protest, Gandhi started fast-unto-death, while he was held in prison. The resulting public outcry forced the government, in consultations with Ambedkar, to replace the Communal Award with a compromise Poona Pact.

Ambedkar accepted the Poona Pact under public pressure, but disagreed with Gandhi and his political methods. He dismissed Gandhi's ideas as loved by "blind Hindu devotees", primitive, influenced by spurious brew of Tolstoy and Ruskin, and "there is always some simpleton to preach them".

Ambedkar concluded that Dalits must leave Hinduism and convert to another religion, and announced his intent to leave Hinduism in 1935. He considered Islam, Christianity, Sikhism, Zoroastrianism and Buddhism. Ambedkar was approached by various leaders of different denominations and faiths. On 22 May 1936, an "All Religious Conference" was held at Lucknow. It was attended by prominent Dalit leaders including Jagjivan Ram, though Ambedkar could not attend it. At the conference, Muslim, Christian, Sikh, and Buddhist representatives presented the tenets of their respective religions in an effort to win over Dalits. Ambedkar rejected the other religions and chose Buddhism. However, Ambedkar remained a Hindu for the next 20 years, studied then re-interpreted Buddhism, and adopted Neo-Buddhism or Navayana few weeks before his death.

The Italian Buddhist monk Lokanatha visited Ambedkar's residence at Dadar on 10 June 1936. Later in an interview to the press, Lokanatha said that Ambedkar was impressed with Buddhism.

Navayana Buddhism

Main article: Navayana

According to Ambedkar, several of the core beliefs and doctrines of traditional Buddhist traditions such as the Four Noble Truths and Anatta were flawed and pessimistic, and may have been inserted into the Buddhist scriptures by wrong-headed Buddhist monks of a later era. These should not be considered as Buddha's teachings in Ambedkar's view. Other foundational concepts of Buddhism such as Karma and Rebirth were considered by Ambedkar as superstitions.

Navayana as formulated by Ambedkar and at the root of Dalit Buddhist movement abandons mainstream traditional Buddhist practices and precepts such as the institution of monk after renunciation, ideas such as karma, rebirth in afterlife, samsara, meditation, nirvana and Four Noble Truths. Ambedkar's new sect of Buddhism rejected these ideas and re-interpreted the Buddha's religion in terms of class struggle and social equality.

Ambedkar called his version of Buddhism Navayana or Neo-Buddhism. His book, The Buddha and His Dhamma, is the holy book of Navayana or Dalit Buddhists. According to Junghare, for the followers of Navyana, Ambedkar has become a deity and he is worshipped in its practice.

Ambedkar's conversion

Ambedkar delivering speech during conversion, Nagpur, 14 October 1956

After publishing a series of books and articles arguing that Buddhism was the only way for the Untouchables to gain equality, Ambedkar publicly converted on 14 October 1956, at Deekshabhoomi, Nagpur, over 20 years after he declared his intent to convert. Around 365,000 of his followers converted to Buddhism at the same ceremony. On this occasion, many upper caste Hindus too accepted Buddhism. After Nagpur, on 16 October 1956, Ambedkar again gave Buddhism to more than 300,000 of his followers at Chandrapur, since the place is also known as Deekshabhoomi. Inspired by this Ambedkar's conversion, 5,000 Tamils of Myanmar had accepted Buddhism in Rangoon under the leadership of Chan Htoon, the justice of the Supreme Court of the Union of Burma on 28 October 1956.

The conversion ceremony was attended by Medharathi, his main disciple Bhoj Dev Mudit, and Mahastvir Bodhanand's Sri Lankan successor, Bhante Pragyanand. Ambedkar asked Dalits not to get entangled in the existing branches of Buddhism (Theravada, Mahayana and Vajrayana), and called his version Navayana or 'Neo-Buddhism'. Ambedkar would die less than two months later, just after finishing his definitive work on Buddhism.

Many Dalits employ the term "Ambedkar(ite) Buddhism" to designate the Buddhist movement, which started with Ambedkar's conversion. Many converted people call themselves "-Bauddha" i.e. Buddhists.

Twenty-two vows

This section is an excerpt from Twenty-two vows of Ambedkar.
Inscription of 22 vows at Deekshabhoomi, Nagpur

The Twenty-two vows or twenty-two pledges are the 22 Buddhist vows administered by B. R. Ambedkar, the revivalist of Buddhism in India, to his followers. On converting to Buddhism, Ambedkar made 22 vows, and asked his 400,000 supporters to do the same. After receiving lay ordination, Ambedkar gave dhamma diksha to his followers. This ceremony organised on 14 October 1956 in Nagpur included 22 vows administered to all new converts after Three Jewels and Five Precepts. On 16 October 1956, Ambedkar performed another mass religious conversion ceremony at Chandrapur.

It is believed by Ambedkarite Buddhists that these vows are the guidelines of the social revolution that motivates human instincts. These vows demonstrate both the social movement aspect of Navayana Buddhism, and demonstrate its core deviation from earlier sects of Buddhism. In India, these vows are taken as an oath by individuals or groups of people when they convert to Buddhism.

After Ambedkar's death

The Buddhist movement was somewhat hindered by Ambedkar's death so shortly after his conversion. It did not receive the immediate mass support from the Untouchable population that Ambedkar had hoped for. Division and lack of direction among the leaders of the Ambedkarite movement have been an additional impediment. According to the 2011 census, there are currently 8.44 million Buddhists in India, at least 6.5 million of whom are Marathi Buddhists in Maharashtra. This makes Buddhism the fifth-largest religion in India and 6% of the population of Maharashtra, but less than 1% of the overall population of India.

The Buddhist revival remains concentrated in two states: Ambedkar's native Maharashtra, and Uttar Pradesh – the land of Bodhanand Mahastavir, Acharya Medharthi and their associates.

Developments in Uttar Pradesh

Statue of B.R.Ambedkar inside Ambedkar Park, Lucknow

Acharya Medharthi retired from his Buddhapuri school in 1960, and shifted to an ashram in Haridwar. He turned to the Arya Samaj and conducted Vedic yajnas all over India. After his death, he was cremated according to Arya Samaj rites. His Buddhpuri school became embroiled in property disputes. His follower, Bhoj Dev Mudit, converted to Buddhism in 1968 and set up a school of his own.

Rajendranath Aherwar appeared as an important Dalit leader in Kanpur. He joined the Republican Party of India and converted to Buddhism along with his whole family in 1961. In 1967, he founded the Kanpur branch of "Bharatiya Buddh Mahasabha". He held regular meetings where he preached Buddhism, officiated at Buddhist weddings and life cycle ceremonies, and organised festivals on Ambedkar's Jayanti (birth day), Sambuddhatva jayanthi, Diksha Divas (the day Ambedkar converted), and Ambedkar Paranirvan Divas (the day Ambedkar died).

The Dalit Buddhist movement in Kanpur gained impetus with the arrival of Dipankar, a Chamar bhikkhu, in 1980. Dipankar had come to Kanpur on a Buddhist mission and his first public appearance was scheduled at a mass conversion drive in 1981. The event was organised by Rahulan Ambawadekar, an RPI Dalit leader. In April 1981, Ambawadekar founded the Dalit Panthers (U.P. Branch) inspired by the Maharashtrian Dalit Panthers. The event met with severe criticism and opposition from Vishva Hindu Parishad and was banned.

The number of Buddhists in the Lucknow district increased from 73 in 1951 to 4327 in 2001. According to the 2001 census, almost 70% of the Buddhist population in Uttar Pradesh is from the scheduled castes background.

In 2002, Kanshi Ram, a popular political leader from a Sikh religious background, announced his intention to convert to Buddhism on 14 October 2006, the fiftieth anniversary of Ambedkar's conversion. He intended for 20,000,000 of his supporters to convert at the same time. Part of the significance of this plan was that Ram's followers include not only Untouchables, but persons from a variety of castes, who could significantly broaden Buddhism's support. But, he died 9 October 2006 after a lengthy illness; he was cremated as per Buddhist tradition.

Another popular Dalit leader, Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister and Bahujan Samaj Party leader Mayawati, has said that she and her followers will embrace Buddhism after the BSP forms a government at the Centre.

Maharashtra

Flag symbolises Dalit movement in India.

Japanese-born Surai Sasai emerged as an important Buddhist leader in India. Sasai came to India in 1966 and met Nichidatsu Fujii, whom he helped with the Peace Pagoda at Rajgir. He fell out with Fuji, however, and started home, but, by his own account, was stopped by a dream in which a figure resembling Nagarjuna appeared and said, "Go to Nagpur". In Nagpur, he met Wamanrao Godbole, the person who had organised the conversion ceremony for Ambedkar in 1956. Sasai claims that when he saw a photograph of Ambedkar at Godbole's home, he realised that it was Ambedkar who had appeared in his dream. At first, Nagpur folk considered Surai Sasai very strange. Then he began to greet them with "Jai Bhim" (victory to Ambedkar) and to build viharas. In 1987 a court case to deport him on the grounds that he had overstayed his visa was dismissed, and he was granted Indian citizenship. Sasai and Bhante Anand Agra are two of main leaders of the campaign to free the Mahabodhi Temple at Bodh Gaya from Hindu control.

A movement originating in Maharashtra but also active in Uttar Pradesh, and spread out over quite a few other pockets where Neo Buddhists live, is Triratna Bauddha Mahāsaṅgha (formerly called TBMSG for Trailokya Bauddha Mahasangha Sahayaka Gana). It is the Indian wing of the UK-based Triratna Buddhist Community founded by Sangharakshita. Its roots lie in the scattered contacts that Sangharakshita had in the 1950s with Ambedkar. Sangharakshita, then still a bhikshu, participated in the conversion movement from 1956 until his departure to the UK in 1963.

When his new ecumenical movement had gained enough ground in the West, Sangharakshita worked with Ambedkarites in India and the UK to develop Indian Buddhism further. After visits in the late 1970s by Dharmachari Lokamitra from UK, supporters developed a two-pronged approach: social work through the Bahujan Hitaj (also spelled as Bahujan Hitay) trust, mainly sponsored from the general public by the British Buddhist-inspired Karuna Trust (UK), and direct Dharma work. Currently the movement has viharas and groups in at least 20 major areas, a couple of retreat centres, and hundreds of Indian Dharmacharis and Dharmacharinis.

Funding for movement's social and dharma work has come from foreign countries, including the Western countries and Taiwan. Some of the foreign-funded organisations include Trailokya Bauddha Mahasangha Sahayaka Gana and Triratna (Europe and India). Triratna has links with the 'Ambedkarite' Buddhist Romanis in Hungary.

Organized mass conversions

Deekshabhoomi Stupa in Nagpur, where Ambedkar converted to Buddhism

Since Ambedkar's conversion, several thousand people from different castes have converted to Buddhism in ceremonies including the twenty-two vows.

1957
In 1957, Mahastvir Bodhanand's Sri Lankan successor, Bhante Pragyanand, held a mass conversion drive for 15,000 people in Lucknow.
2001
A prominent Indian Navayana Buddhist leader and political activist, Udit Raj, organised a large mass conversion on 4 November 2001, where he gave the 22 vows, but the event met with active opposition from the government.
2006, Hyderabad
A report from the UK daily The Guardian said that some Hindus have converted to Buddhism. Buddhist monks from the UK and the U.S. attended the conversion ceremonies in India. Lalit Kumar, who works for a Hindu nationalist welfare association in Andhra Pradesh, asserted that Dalits should concentrate on trying to reduce illiteracy and poverty rather than looking for new religions.
2006, Gulbarga
On 14 October 2006, hundreds of people converted from Hinduism to Buddhism in Gulburga (Karnataka).
2006
At 50th anniversary celebrations in 2006 of Ambedkar's deeksha. Non-partisan sources put the number of attendees (not converts) at 30,000. The move was criticised by Hindu groups as "unhelpful" and has been criticised as a "political stunt."
2007, Mumbai
On 27 May 2007, tens of thousands of Dalits from Maharashtra gathered at the Mahalakshmi racecourse in Mumbai to mark the 50th anniversary of the conversion of Ambedkar. The number of people who converted versus the number of people in attendance was not clear. The event was organised by the Republican Party of India leader Ramdas Athvale.

Critique

Prerna Singh Bindra argued a mass-conversion of Hindus to Ambedkarite Buddhism under Udit Raj to be a political stunt.

Distinctive interpretation

See also: Navayana and Buddhist modernism

According to Gail Omvedt, an American-born and naturalised Indian sociologist and human rights activist:

Ambedkar's Buddhism seemingly differs from that of those who accepted by faith, who 'go for refuge' and accept the canon. This much is clear from its basis: it does not accept in totality the scriptures of the Theravada, the Mahayana, or the Vajrayana. The question that is then clearly put forth: is a fourth yana, a Navayana, a kind of modernistic Enlightenment version of the Dhamma really possible within the framework of Buddhism?

According to Omvedt, Ambedkar and his Buddhist movement deny many of the core doctrines of Buddhism. All the elements of religious modernism, state Christopher Queen and Sallie King, may be found in Ambedkar Buddhism where his The Buddha and His Dhamma abandons the traditional precepts and practices, then adopts science, activism and social reforms as a form of Engaged Buddhism. Ambedkar's formulation of Buddhism is different from Western modernism, states Skaria, given his synthesis of the ideas of modern Karl Marx into the structure of ideas by the ancient Buddha.

Criticism of the movement

Critics have argued that Neo-Buddhism does not have a strong influence, especially after the death of Ambedkar.

Some critics also argue that Neo-Buddhism deviates too much from traditional Buddhism. Even though traditional Buddhism emphasizes equality among people, it does not deny the caste system. In addition, its emphasis on people's liberation in the religious sense does not deny social distinctions as the norm of organizations in society, as the Buddha himself was the founder of a monastic order. A number of critics also argue that there is no moral foundation for the political practices that are based on Neo-Buddhist notions, since religion is totally voluntary, and Neo-Buddhism may thus violate democratic principles by restricting its followers to abide to certain non-religious rules.

Navayana as a political movement

The mass conversions to Buddhism are also seen as a political stunt rather than a genuine spiritual movement. Politicians such as Udit Raj, Ramdas Athawale, Kanshi Ram and Mayawati have also been involved in staging or planning to stage mass conversions—these politicians are members of either the Bahujan Samaj Party or the Republican Party of India.

According to Janet Contursi, Ambedkar re-interprets Buddhist religion and with Navayana "speaks through Gautama and politicizes the Buddha philosophy as he theologizes his own political views".

Ambedkar's reinterpretations

Ambedkar not only rejected Hinduism but also the most popular Buddhist schools. Ambedkar considered all ideas in Theravada, Vajrayana and Mahayana Buddhism that relate to an individual's merit and spiritual development as insertions into Buddhism, and something that "cannot be accepted to be the word of the Buddha". Buddhism, to Ambedkar, must have been a social reform movement. Ambedkar's radical reinterpretations of the faith rejected many of the main tenets of mainstream Buddhism such as renunciation, meditation, Samsara, Karma, reincarnation and even the Four Noble Truths, which Ambedkar claims to have been invented by wrong-headed monks.

Ambedkar reinvents the traditional story of The Buddha and the Great Renunciation in order to try and gain mass appeal from Dalits by giving the impression that The Buddha founded Buddhism as a social reform movement rather than a spiritual movement. Virginia Hancock writes about Ambedkar's reinterpretations as turning the Buddha into a politician.

According to Ambedkar, the Buddha advocated a rational and peaceful resolution of an inter-tribe water conflict but was unable to gain the necessary political leverage because he lacked majority vote. He then went into exile and became a renunciant because it was the only way to prevent his tribe from going to war with their neighbors. Ambedkar omits any mention of old age, sickness, and death (the forms of suffering the Buddha is usually understood to have encountered). In this way the Buddha’s renunciation is motivated more by political exigencies rather than a desire to find the ultimate truth, and he becomes a figure not unlike a minority politician in contemporary India. The discussion of water rights was also a familiar topic after the Mahad Satyagraha. These changes, though unorthodox, create a character for the Buddha that might be easily understood by oppressed communities, specifically Dalits.

Scholars broadly accept that the depictions of the Buddha as a social reformer are inaccurate. Gombrich (2012), states that there is no evidence that the Buddha began or pursued social reforms, rather his aim was at the salvation of those who joined his monastic order. Modernist interpreters of Buddhism, states Gombrich, keep picking up this "mistake from western authors", a view that initially came into vogue during the colonial era.

Richard Gombrich adds that Buddha should not be seen as a social reformer: "his concern was to reform individuals and help them leave society forever, not to reform the world... He never preached against social inequality, only declared its irrelevance to salvation. He never tried to abolish the caste system nor to do away with slavery"

Empirical evidence outside of India, such as in the Theravada Buddhist monasteries of the Sinhalese society, suggests that class ideas have been prevalent among the sangha monks, and between the Buddhist monks and the laity. In all canonical Buddhist texts, the khattiyas (warrior class) are always mentioned first and never other classes such as brahmans, vessas, suddas.

See also

Notes

  1. It has been long recognized that Buddhism and Jainism were not movements for social reform, and that the Buddha's doctrine did not aim at transformation or improvement of the social conditions.

References

  1. Ranjit Kumar De; Uttara Shastree (1996). Religious Converts in India: Socio-political Study of Neo-Buddhists. Mittal Publications. p. 10. ISBN 978-81-7099-629-3.
  2. Gary Tartakov (2003). Rowena Robinson (ed.). Religious Conversion in India: Modes, Motivations, and Meanings. Oxford University Press. pp. 192–213. ISBN 978-0-19-566329-7.
  3. Christopher Queen (2015). Steven M. Emmanuel (ed.). A Companion to Buddhist Philosophy. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 524–525. ISBN 978-1-119-14466-3.
  4. ^ Omvedt, Gail. Buddhism in India : Challenging Brahmanism and Caste. 3rd ed. London/New Delhi/Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2003. pages: 2–15, 210–213
  5. ^ Skaria, A (2015). "Ambedkar, Marx and the Buddhist Question". Journal of South Asian Studies. 38 (3). Taylor & Francis: 450–452. doi:10.1080/00856401.2015.1049726., Quote: "Here there is not only a criticism of religion (most of all, Hinduism, but also prior traditions of Buddhism), but also of secularism, and that criticism is articulated moreover as a religion."
  6. Thomas Pantham; Vrajendra Raj Mehta; Vrajendra Raj Mehta (2006). Political Ideas in Modern India: thematic explorations. Sage Publications. ISBN 0-7619-3420-0.
  7. ^ Christopher Queen (2015). Steven M. Emmanuel (ed.). A Companion to Buddhist Philosophy. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 524–529. ISBN 978-1-119-14466-3.
  8. Jason Neelis (2010). Early Buddhist Transmission and Trade Networks: Mobility and Exchange Within and Beyond the Northwestern Borderlands of South Asia. BRILL Academic. pp. 102–106. ISBN 978-90-04-18159-5.
  9. Ann Heirman; Stephan Peter Bumbacher (2007). The Spread of Buddhism. BRILL Academic. pp. 139–142. ISBN 978-90-04-15830-6.
  10. Andrew Powell (1989). Living Buddhism. University of California Press. pp. 38–39. ISBN 978-0-520-20410-2.
  11. Lars Fogelin (2015). An Archaeological History of Indian Buddhism. Oxford University Press. pp. 6–11, 218, 229–230. ISBN 978-0-19-994823-9.
  12. Sheila Canby (1993). "Depictions of Buddha Sakyamuni in the Jami al-Tavarikh and the Majma al-Tavarikh". Muqarnas. 10: 299–310. doi:10.2307/1523195. JSTOR 1523195.
  13. Randall Collins, The Sociology of Philosophies: A Global Theory of Intellectual Change. Harvard University Press, 2000, pages 184–185
  14. Craig Lockard (2007). Societies, Networks, and Transitions: Volume I: A Global History. University of Wisconsin Press. p. 364. ISBN 978-0-618-38612-3.
  15. Peter Harvey (2013). An Introduction to Buddhism: Teachings, History and Practices. Cambridge University Press. pp. 194–195. ISBN 978-0-521-85942-4.
  16. Ahir, D.C. (1991). Buddhism in Modern India. Satguru. ISBN 81-7030-254-4.
  17. Das, Bhagwan (1998). Revival of Buddhism in India. Role of Dr Baba Sahib B.R.Ambedkar. Lucknow: Dalit Today Prakashan. ISBN 81-7030-254-4.
  18. ^ Anand Teltumbde (2016). Dalits: Past, Present and Future. Taylor & Francis. pp. 59–61. ISBN 978-1-315-52644-7.
  19. ^ Bellwinkel-Schempp, Maren (2004). "Roots of Ambedkar Buddhism in Kanpur". In Jondhale, Surendra; Beltz, Johannes (eds.). Reconstructing the World: B.R. Ambedkar and Buddhism in India (PDF). New Delhi: Oxford University Press. pp. 221–244. Archived (PDF) from the original on 1 August 2012.
  20. ^ Anand Teltumbde (2016). Dalits: Past, Present and Future. Taylor & Francis. pp. 57–59. ISBN 978-1-315-52644-7.
  21. ^ Robert E. Buswell Jr.; Donald S. Lopez Jr. (2013). The Princeton Dictionary of Buddhism. Princeton University Press. p. 34. ISBN 978-1-4008-4805-8.
  22. ^ Andrew Muldoon (2016). Empire, Politics and the Creation of the 1935 India Act: Last Act of the Raj. Routledge. pp. 92–99. ISBN 978-1-317-14431-1.
  23. Rajmohan Gandhi (2006). Gandhi: The Man, His People, and the Empire. University of California Press. pp. 332–333. ISBN 978-0-520-25570-8.
  24. Andrew Muldoon (2016). Empire, Politics and the Creation of the 1935 India Act: Last Act of the Raj. Routledge. p. 97. ISBN 978-1-317-14431-1.
  25. Judith Margaret Brown (1991). Gandhi: Prisoner of Hope. Yale University Press. pp. 252–257. ISBN 978-0-300-05125-4.
  26. Arthur Herman (2008). Gandhi & Churchill: The Epic Rivalry that Destroyed an Empire and Forged Our Age. Random House. pp. 382–390. ISBN 978-0-553-90504-5.
  27. Nicholas B. Dirks (2011). Castes of Mind: Colonialism and the Making of Modern India. Princeton University Press. pp. 267–274. ISBN 978-1-4008-4094-6.
  28. Kamath, M. V. (1995). Gandhi's Coolie: Life & Times of Ramkrishna Bajaj. Allied Publishers. p. 24. ISBN 8170234875.
  29. Rachel Fell McDermott; Leonard A. Gordon; Ainslie T. Embree; Frances W. Pritchett; Dennis Dalton, eds. (2014). Sources of Indian Traditions: Modern India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh. Vol. 2 (3rd ed.). Columbia University Press. pp. 369–370. ISBN 978-0-231-51092-9.
  30. Arthur Herman (2008). Gandhi & Churchill: The Epic Rivalry that Destroyed an Empire and Forged Our Age. Random House. p. 586. ISBN 978-0-553-90504-5. Archived from the original on 13 September 2014.
  31. Cháirez-Garza, Jesús Francisco (2 January 2014). "Touching space: Ambedkar on the spatial features of untouchability". Contemporary South Asia. 22 (1). Taylor & Francis: 37–50. doi:10.1080/09584935.2013.870978. S2CID 145020542.
  32. ^ Damien Keown; Charles S. Prebish (2013). Encyclopedia of Buddhism. Routledge. pp. 24–26. ISBN 978-1-136-98588-1.
  33. "The chance the Parsis missed". dna. 21 August 2008. Retrieved 23 June 2018.
  34. Damien Keown; Charles S. Prebish (2013). Encyclopedia of Buddhism. Routledge. pp. 24–26. ISBN 978-1-136-98588-1.
  35. Keer, Dhananjay (1990). Dr Ambedkar Life and Mission. Popular Prakashan, Bombay. ISBN 81-85604-37-1.
  36. ^ Eleanor Zelliot (2015). Knut A. Jacobsen (ed.). Routledge Handbook of Contemporary India. Taylor & Francis. pp. 13, 361–370. ISBN 978-1-317-40357-9.
  37. Damien Keown; Charles S. Prebish (2013). Encyclopedia of Buddhism. Routledge. p. 25. ISBN 978-1-136-98588-1., Quote: "(...)The Buddhism upon which he settled and about which he wrote in The Buddha and His Dhamma was, in many respects, unlike any form of Buddhism that had hitherto arisen within the tradition. Gone, for instance, were the doctrines of karma and rebirth, the traditional emphasis on renunciation of the world, the practice of meditation, and the experience of enlightenment. Gone too were any teachings that implied the existence of a trans-empirical realm (...). Most jarring, perhaps, especially among more traditional Buddhists, was the absence of the Four Noble Truths, which Ambedkar regarded as the invention of wrong-headed monks".
  38. ^ Anne M. Blackburn (1993), Religion, Kinship and Buddhism: Ambedkar's Vision of a Moral Community, The Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 16 (1), 1–22
  39. Christopher S. Queen (2000). Engaged Buddhism in the West. Wisdom Publications. p. 23. ISBN 978-0-86171-159-8.
  40. Christopher Queen (2015). Steven M. Emmanuel (ed.). A Companion to Buddhist Philosophy. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 524–531. ISBN 978-1-119-14466-3.
  41. I.Y. Junghare (1988), Dr. Ambedkar: The Hero of the Mahars, Ex-Untouchables of India, Asian Folklore Studies 47 (1), 93–121, "(...) the new literature of the Mahars and their making of the Ambedkar deity for their new religion, Neo-Buddhism. (...) Song five is clearly representative of the Mahar community's respect and devotion for Ambedkar. He has become their God and they worship him as the singer sings: "We worship Bhima, too." (...) In the last song, Dr. Ambedkar is raised from a deity to a supreme deity. He is omnipresent, omnipotent, and omniscient."
  42. Gaikwad, Dr. Dnyanraj Kashinath (2016). Mahamanav Dr. Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar (in Marathi). Riya Publication. p. 341.
  43. Omvedt 2003, pp. 261–262.
  44. Jenkins, Laura Dudley (11 April 2019). "Ambedkarite Buddhists: Religious and Political Mobility". Religious Freedom and Mass Conversion in India. University of Pennsylvania Press. pp. 65–66. ISBN 978-0-8122-9600-6.
  45. "236 dalits adopt Buddhism in protest against Hathras Case". Media India Group. 16 October 2020. Retrieved 24 October 2021.
  46. Purandare, Vaibhav. "How Babasaheb rejected and criticised the Vedas". The Economic Times. Retrieved 24 October 2021.
  47. "Census GIS HouseHold". Archived from the original on 6 July 2010.
  48. Das, Shiv Shankar. "Ambedkar Buddhism in Uttar Pradesh (1951–2001): An Analysis of Demographic, Social, Economic and Political Developments" (PDF). RINDAS International Symposium Series I. Ryukoku University, Japan. pp. 56–74. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 April 2014. Retrieved 3 June 2013.
  49. Das, Shiv Shankar. "Buddhism in Lucknow: History and Culture From Alternative Sources" (PDF). Ambedkar Times. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 April 2014. Retrieved 25 May 2013.
  50. "BBC NEWS – South Asia – Indian Dalit leader passes away". Retrieved 27 February 2015.
  51. "Kanshi Ram cremated as per Buddhist rituals". The Hindu. 10 October 2006. Archived from the original on 1 October 2007. Retrieved 27 February 2015.
  52. "Kanshi Ram cremated as per Buddhist rituals". The Hindu. 10 October 2006. Archived from the original on 1 October 2007. Retrieved 30 August 2007.
  53. Doyle, Tara N. (2003). Liberate the Mahabodhi Temple! Socially Engaged Buddhism, Dalit-Style. In: Steven Heine, Charles Prebish (eds), Buddhism in the Modern World. Oxford University Press. pp. 249–280. ISBN 0-19-514698-0.
  54. "Ambedkar's Vision" (PDF). 20 April 2012. Archived from the original (PDF) on 20 April 2012.
  55. "TBMSG: Trailokya Bauddha Mahasangha Sahayaka Gana". Retrieved 27 February 2015.
  56. "Jai Bhim Network". www.jaibhim.hu. Archived from the original on 4 April 2015. Retrieved 26 April 2015.
  57. "50,000 Dalits embrace Buddhism". Buddhism Today. Retrieved 30 August 2007.
  58. "Untouchables embrace Buddha to escape oppression", The Guardian
  59. "Hundreds embrace Buddhism in Gulbarga-Bangalore", Times of India
  60. "Prominent Indian female politician to embrace Buddhism". The Buddhist Channel. 17 October 2006. Retrieved 30 August 2007.
  61. ^ Prerna Singh Bindra ."Heads, I win...", The Week Magazine, 18 November 2001.
  62. "BBC NEWS – South Asia – Mass Dalit conversions in Mumbai". Retrieved 27 February 2015.
  63. Nithin Belle. "Thousands of Dalits in 'mass conversion'" Archived 11 February 2012 at the Wayback Machine, Khaleej Times, 28 May 2007
  64. "Conversion: Ram Raj's rally was probably just an exercise in self-promotion", The Week
  65. Omvedt, Gail. Buddhism in India : Challenging Brahmanism and Caste, 3rd ed. London/New Delhi/Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2003. pages: 8
  66. Christopher S. Queen; Sallie B. King (1996). Engaged Buddhism: Buddhist Liberation Movements in Asia. State University of New York Press. pp. 65–66. ISBN 978-0-7914-2843-6.
  67. Skaria, A. (2015). "Ambedkar, Marx and the Buddhist Question". Journal of South Asian Studies. 38 (3). Taylor & Francis: 450–465. doi:10.1080/00856401.2015.1049726.
  68. VERMA, VIDHU (2010). "Reinterpreting Buddhism: Ambedkar on the Politics of Social Action". Economic and Political Weekly. 45 (49): 56–65. ISSN 0012-9976. JSTOR 27917939.
  69. ^ Hancock, Virginia (2013). "New Buddhism for New Aspirations: Navayana Buddhism of Ambedkar and His Followers" (PDF). First Conference on Religions in the Indic Civilisation.
  70. "India Conversion: Ram Raj's rally was probably just an exercise in self-promotion, Nov 11, 2001 the Week". Archived from the original on 22 June 2003.
  71. "Mayawati claims Kanshi Ram's legacy". www.rediff.com.
  72. "More Dalit Mass Conversions". Tricycle: The Buddhist Review. 29 May 2007.
  73. Contursi, Janet A. (1993). "Political Theology: Text and Practice in a Dalit Panther Community". The Journal of Asian Studies. 52 (2). Cambridge University Press: 320–339. doi:10.2307/2059650. JSTOR 2059650. S2CID 162564306.
  74. Zelliot, Eleanor; Macy, Joanna Rogers (1980). "Tradition and innovation in contemporary Indian Buddhism". In Narain, A.K. (ed.). Studies in the History of Buddhism. Delhi, IN: B.R. Publishing. pp. 134–142.
  75. ^ Krishan, Y. (1986). "Buddhism and the caste system". The Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies. 9 (1): 71–84.
  76. ^ Gombrich, Richard (2012). Buddhist Precept & Practice. Routledge. pp. 344–345, context and discussion: 343–370. ISBN 978-1-136-15623-6.
  77. Collins, Randall (2000). The Sociology of Philosophies: A global theory of intellectual change. Harvard University Press. pp. 205–206.
  78. Queen, Christopher S.; King, Sallie B. (1996). Engaged Buddhism: Buddhist Liberation Movements in Asia. State University of New York Press. pp. 17–18. ISBN 978-0-7914-2844-3.
  79. Alberts, Wanda (2007). Integrative Religious Education in Europe: A study-of-religions approach. Walter de Gruyter. pp. 258–259. ISBN 978-3-11-097134-7.
  80. Lopez, Donald S. Jr. (2009). Buddhism and Science: A guide for the perplexed. University of Chicago Press. pp. 84–91. ISBN 978-0-226-49324-4.
  81. Queen, Christopher S.; King, Sallie B. (14 March 1996). Engaged Buddhism: Buddhist Liberation Movements in Asia. SUNY Press. ISBN 9780791428443.
  82. Gombrich, Richard (2012). Buddhist Precept & Practice. Routledge. pp. 343–366. ISBN 978-1-136-15623-6.

Bibliography

External links

   Topics in Buddhism   
Foundations
The Buddha
Bodhisattvas
Disciples
Key concepts
Cosmology
Branches
Practices
Nirvana
Monasticism
Major figures
Texts
Countries
History
Philosophy
Culture
Miscellaneous
Comparison
Lists
Categories: