| Revision as of 23:57, 28 December 2019 editSashiRolls (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users20,627 edits →Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 03:20, 8 December 2024 edit undoMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,135,762 edits →Palestine-Israel articles 5 updates: new sectionTag: MassMessage delivery | ||
| (497 intermediate revisions by 77 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ] For those who like to rummage, the been is ]. | ] For those who like to rummage, the been is ]. | ||
| == ] updates == | |||
| == Links to full text on digital libraries == | |||
| You are receiving this message because you are on ] for ]. The drafters note that the scope of the case was somewhat unclear, and clarify that the scope is {{tqq|The interaction of named parties in the ] topic area and examination of the ] process that led to ] ] to ]}}. Because this was unclear, two changes are being made: | |||
| I understand you're interested in the matter of . ] is huge and we seem to have some 250k articles linking a GB ID + page number, but there's also ], and even more numerous are the citations of academic papers which mention a DOI. In this field, there are but one of the biggest is ], which we link from thousands of articles. The matter is discussed at ]. ] 22:13, 25 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
| First, '''the Committee will accept submissions for new parties for the next three days''', until '''23:59, 10 December 2024 (UTC)'''. Anyone who wishes to suggest a party to the case may do so by creating a new section on ], providing a reason with ] as to why the user should be added, and notifying the user. After the three-day period ends, no further submission of parties will be considered except in exceptional circumstances. Because the Committee only hears disputes that have failed to be resolved by the usual means, proposed parties should have been recently taken to AE/AN/ANI, and either not sanctioned, or incompletely sanctioned. If a proposed party has not been taken to AE/AN/ANI, evidence is needed as to why such an attempt would have been ineffective. | |||
| :Thanks Nemo, this will take me a while to read through, but I've gotten started. ^^ 🌿 ] <sup>] · ]</sup> 23:27, 25 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
| Second, the ] '''has been extended by a week''', and will now close at '''23:59, 21 December 2024 (UTC)'''. For the Arbitration Committee, <b>]]</b> (] • he/they) 03:20, 8 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Tulsi Gabbard == | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:HouseBlaster@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel_articles_5/Update_list&oldid=1260342644 --> | |||
| Why are you writing in your edit summary 'undue weight' when your edit is not a question of weight but introducing a tendentious, and wrong word, 'teenager'. You obviously want the reader to infer that this is an unformed intellect, one that can't be judged an adult , but the dates in the article cited don't support that really do they? Or am I misreading the article cited. She doesn't seem , in 2002, to be removing herself from her fathers campaign objectives in 2002? When she was not a teenager. Why introduce tendentious misleading text.] (]) 20:33, 3 December 2019 (UTC) | |||
| :The article says the bill passed that the organization lobbied for when she was 17. It says that she mentioned her experience with the organization's lobbying effort later in 2002 when she was running for public office for the first time at 21. It does not say she continuously worked for the organization between those two times. I used the term "teenager" because you objected to me citing what was in the article ("When she was seventeen"). 🌿 ] <sup>] · ]</sup> 08:40, 4 December 2019 (UTC) | |||
| :I have started a sockpuppet investigation . 🌿 ] <sup>] · ]</sup> 09:42, 4 December 2019 (UTC) | |||
| :: Yes, I see that. Keep white washing the tyrants Sashi, thats your role isn't it. I'll keep sniping back whenever I can. With RS. ] (]) 22:57, 4 December 2019 (UTC) | |||
| ::: For info, I worked with an <s>Alawite</s> <u>Armenian</u> guy, who was furious with al-Jazeera for pushing war in Syria back in 2012. It gave me a little perspective on the complexity of the situation. Cheers, ], if I haven't been blocked, and even if you are (as I suppose you might be), I'm fairly sure we'll meet again. ^^ 🌿 ] <sup>] · ]</sup> 23:08, 4 December 2019 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Pushing conspiracy theories is a 'perspective'. Of a kind. Troll, really. ] (]) 23:15, 4 December 2019 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Ah, how memory plays tricks after 7 years. He was actually an Armenian Christian, not Alawite, come to think of it. DYK a lot of the Manchester Wikipedians, Dan? 🌿 ] <sup>] · ]</sup> 23:42, 4 December 2019 (UTC) | |||
| ::::: Memory going the way of the intellect. DYK a lot of conspiracy theorists? ] (]) 23:47, 4 December 2019 (UTC) | |||
| :::::: OK. That's about enough splenetic propaganda for today ]. Quit harassing the worker-ants.🌿 ] <sup>] · ]</sup> 23:52, 4 December 2019 (UTC) | |||
| == For giving voice == | |||
| {| class="barnstar" style="border:1px solid gray; background:#fdffe7;" | |||
| |- | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="padding-right:5px;" | ] | |||
| |style="font-size:1.65em; padding:0; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Thank you for your diligent updates on protest movements around the world - work that is cited, translated, and read far beyond our digital borders. <span style="color:#666">– ]]</span> 22:07, 4 December 2019 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| :Thanks, SJ. '''' is a motivating verb in French! ^^ Hope you are well! (I see that some schools have started opening back up in Haïti this week.) 🌿 ] <sup>] · ]</sup> 10:52, 5 December 2019 (UTC) | |||
| ::{{Ping|Boud}} thanks for all of your good work in this area. You deserve this ''much'' more than I do. Maybe ] will check out your work and add one. ^^ 🌿 ] <sup>] · ]</sup> 23:51, 7 December 2019 (UTC) | |||
| :::Thanks. :). ] (]) 10:13, 8 December 2019 (UTC) | |||
| == I have created a topic at ] == | |||
| Hi | |||
| i noticed your reversion and other edits, and made a comment about my edits and an explanation so that we can establish some sort of agreement and consensus on how to proceed; having been reverted because "the copyedit inverted cause and effect", is indeed a serious accusation to me. | |||
| Why? Because I am a member of GOCE and have copy-edited for many years, and so I will try and explain why I made the edits. | |||
| You may, of course, still disagree, but without consensus we are lost :) ] (]) 18:30, 6 December 2019 (UTC) | |||
| :I have responded: you changed {{tq|after X}} to {{tq|after ''which'' X}} which inverts cause and effect. No big deal, I've reverted back. 🌿 ] <sup>] · ]</sup> 20:24, 6 December 2019 (UTC) | |||
| == Highly uncontroversial RM needs closure == | |||
| ] has full consensus, is past its 7-day deadline, and I don't see how it could be controversial. Nevertheless, I'm ] rather than ], since as I on my own constitute a 50% !voting bloc, I could be biased. See ] if you wish to help. :) ] (]) 20:12, 7 December 2019 (UTC) | |||
| :It's done; I went ahead and moved it and slashed out the 2019 part (reduplicated in the main article). I'll add a note to the talk page about that big deletion. 🌿 ] <sup>] · ]</sup> 23:18, 7 December 2019 (UTC) | |||
| == It’s that time of year! == | |||
| {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
| |rowspan="5" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] <sub>]</sub> ] 16:56, 13 December 2019 (UTC)</sup></center>]] | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" |<big><big><center> '''Time To Spread A Little'''<br/> ''' | |||
| {{font color|red|Happy}}''' '''{{font color|gold|Holiday}}''' '''{{font color|green|Cheer!!}}'''</center></big></big> | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | <center>''I decorated a special kind of '''{{font color|red|Christmas}} {{font color|green|tree}}'''<br/> in the spirit of the season.<br/><br/> | |||
| What's especially nice about<br/> this digitized version:<br/> *it doesn't need water <br/>*won't catch fire<br/>*and batteries aren't required.'' </center> | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.0em;" | <center><big>Have a very Merry Christmas – Happy Hanukkah‼️ <br/> | |||
| and a prosperous New Year!! | |||
| 🍸🎁 🎉</big></center> | |||
| |} | |||
| {{clear}} | |||
| ==Happy Holidays== | |||
| {| style="background-color: #FFFFFF; border: 2px solid #008000;" | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" |Thank you for continuing to make Misplaced Pages the greatest project in the world. I hope you have an excellent holiday season. ] (]) 21:41, 22 December 2019 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| :], May your 2020 be filled with ! :) | |||
| == Media Coverage == | |||
| There is a 1RR in effect on the page. Editors physically cannot perform multiple edit reverts. Per the talk page at the time, there is no established consensus and issues have not been addressed. You should revert your edits. The style changes can remain, but the controversial issues should remain until an agreement is made.--]] 21:39, 26 December 2019 (UTC) | |||
| :If you make three edits in succession with no intervening edits, that counts as one revert, for info. 🌿 ] <sup>] · ]</sup> 21:46, 26 December 2019 (UTC) | |||
| ::I've always counted one single edit as in the 1RR. Any other removal being more. With the contentious topic, I'd rather not give editors an excuse to try to bring me before administrative boards. That is why I came to your talk page first, in order to allow the current discussions on the talk page and the RS noticeboard to continue to play out. The information being removed has an established consensus per ] as of right now. I'm just asking nicely and respectfully to allow the process to play out and let the chips fall where they may.--]] 21:58, 26 December 2019 (UTC) | |||
| == Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion == | |||
| ] | |||
| This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the ] regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. | |||
| Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!<!--Template:DRN-notice-->. ] (]) 18:39, 28 December 2019 (UTC) | |||
| :Funny, ], I'd just been thinking about lifting my "long-standing" request that you not post to my talk-page. Speaking of the WaPo & bias, the WaPo made you look really bad on the ] page. You dutifully copied the most damaging text about ''Counterpunch'' that you could into Misplaced Pages, back on 26 Dec 2017, which I found by searching for "stoking discontent". You added it, as often, . Bad luck. It turns out you read your WaPo source wrong (which your WaPo source actually facilitated by not being precise in its claims). Alice Donovan didn't write about any of the things you said she did at ''CounterPunch''. You "edited" the article as recently as last month, one wonders why you never went back to fix your disinformation. Do you have anything to say about falsely suggesting that ''Counterpunch'' was "stoking discontent" regarding Hilary Clinton by publishing one (1) article during the election by someone the FBI apparently alleges was a Russian agent that had nothing to do with Clinton, the election, Wikileaks or Assange? For info: I had no idea whatsoever who was behind this edit until using WikiBlame... 🌿 ] <sup>] · ]</sup> 21:29, 28 December 2019 (UTC) | |||
| ::Wow, the follow-up on that story is something else. ^^ 🌿 ] <sup>] · ]</sup> 22:34, 28 December 2019 (UTC) | |||
| :::Actually, I see you first added it on Christmas Day, 2017, the same day Jeffrey St. Clair's article appeared. (sigh: how do you get your selected sources so quickly and your unselected ones so slowly?) Incidentally, if I start talking about you on my TP after you open a section, you are of course welcome to respond. 🌿 ] <sup>] · ]</sup> 23:54, 28 December 2019 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 03:20, 8 December 2024
For those who like to rummage, the been is here.
Palestine-Israel articles 5 updates
You are receiving this message because you are on the update list for Palestine-Israel articles 5. The drafters note that the scope of the case was somewhat unclear, and clarify that the scope is The interaction of named parties in the WP:PIA topic area and examination of the WP:AE process that led to two referrals to WP:ARCA
. Because this was unclear, two changes are being made:
First, the Committee will accept submissions for new parties for the next three days, until 23:59, 10 December 2024 (UTC). Anyone who wishes to suggest a party to the case may do so by creating a new section on the evidence talk page, providing a reason with WP:DIFFS as to why the user should be added, and notifying the user. After the three-day period ends, no further submission of parties will be considered except in exceptional circumstances. Because the Committee only hears disputes that have failed to be resolved by the usual means, proposed parties should have been recently taken to AE/AN/ANI, and either not sanctioned, or incompletely sanctioned. If a proposed party has not been taken to AE/AN/ANI, evidence is needed as to why such an attempt would have been ineffective.
Second, the evidence phase has been extended by a week, and will now close at 23:59, 21 December 2024 (UTC). For the Arbitration Committee, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 03:20, 8 December 2024 (UTC)