| Revision as of 05:31, 10 December 2006 editRenata3 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators45,578 edits nominate afd - non-notable | Latest revision as of 16:43, 19 March 2023 edit undoLegobot (talk | contribs)Bots1,669,103 editsm Bot: Fixing lint errors, replacing obsolete HTML tags: <font> (3x)Tag: Fixed lint errors | ||
| (14 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. '' | |||
| <!--Template:Afd top | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result was '''merge''' to ], dab page adjusted accordingly. ] 14:30, 17 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| Non-notable guy who ''plans'' (according to source in 2004) sue U.S. government. ] 05:31, 10 December 2006 (UTC) | Non-notable guy who ''plans'' (according to source in 2004) sue U.S. government. ] 05:31, 10 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Strong keep'''. What the heck? Three seperate articles about the guy are pretty much instant notability. -] <small><sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub></small> 05:38, 10 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Merge''' to ]. Several people considerably more famous than this person have had similar experiences. --] 05:43, 10 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Merge''' per above. He is not notable for anything he did, he is simply a statistic. Any article that needs to state "he is notable because..." is not notable. ] 08:05, 10 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Merge''' per Metropolitan90. ← ] <sup>]</sup> <small>12:10, 10 December 2006 (UTC)</small> | |||
| *'''Comment'''. I've added another source with some more information now. -] <small><sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub></small> 15:35, 10 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Merge''', per Metropolitan90. ] 15:36, 11 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Merge''' per Metropolitan90] 22:51, 11 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Strong KEEP''' He is notable not for what he did, but for what was done to him. The articles needs serious expansion, which will be easy as every news source has written about it, here and abroad, and will be continuing to until the matter is finally resolved, some years from now. This is already a notable civil liberties case, and not keeping it would be a very serious POV bias.] 02:04, 13 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Keep'''. This "planned" lawsuit doesn't move me, but he's received enough publicity that readers may want to know about him. One trouble with merger is that I'm not sure we could keep him listed on the ] dab page, which would lessen Misplaced Pages's value in helping to sort out these four people. ]<small> ] ]</small> 09:37, 15 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| **I don't see a problem with leaving him on the disambiguation page with a link to ]. Not every entry on a disambiguation page needs to have a full page in its own right. --] 20:15, 16 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | |||
Latest revision as of 16:43, 19 March 2023
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to No Fly List#False positives and alleged misuses, dab page adjusted accordingly. Sandstein 14:30, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
Asif Iqbal (Rochester, NY)
Non-notable guy who plans (according to source in 2004) sue U.S. government. Renata 05:31, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- Strong keep. What the heck? Three seperate articles about the guy are pretty much instant notability. -Amarkov edits 05:38, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- Merge to No Fly List#False positives and alleged misuses. Several people considerably more famous than this person have had similar experiences. --Metropolitan90 05:43, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- Merge per above. He is not notable for anything he did, he is simply a statistic. Any article that needs to state "he is notable because..." is not notable. Resolute 08:05, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- Merge per Metropolitan90. ← ANAS 12:10, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment. I've added another source with some more information now. -Amarkov edits 15:35, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- Merge, per Metropolitan90. Inner Earth 15:36, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Merge per Metropolitan90RaveenS 22:51, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Strong KEEP He is notable not for what he did, but for what was done to him. The articles needs serious expansion, which will be easy as every news source has written about it, here and abroad, and will be continuing to until the matter is finally resolved, some years from now. This is already a notable civil liberties case, and not keeping it would be a very serious POV bias.DGG 02:04, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. This "planned" lawsuit doesn't move me, but he's received enough publicity that readers may want to know about him. One trouble with merger is that I'm not sure we could keep him listed on the Asif Iqbal dab page, which would lessen Misplaced Pages's value in helping to sort out these four people. JamesMLane t c 09:37, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- I don't see a problem with leaving him on the disambiguation page with a link to No Fly List#False positives and alleged misuses. Not every entry on a disambiguation page needs to have a full page in its own right. --Metropolitan90 20:15, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.