| Revision as of 20:23, 10 December 2006 edit81.131.101.50 (talk) →Hi Kangroo Man: OH this is getting really interesting.← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 13:10, 19 November 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,290,982 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Netsnipe/Archive 4) (bot | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{User_talk:Netsnipe/header}} | {{User_talk:Netsnipe/header}} | ||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
| <!-- BEGIN WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE --><!-- This page is automatically archived by Werdnabot-->{{User:Werdnabot/Archiver/Linkhere}} <!--This is an empty template, but transcluding it counts as a link, meaning Werdnabot is directed to this page - DO NOT SUBST IT --><!--Werdnabot-Archive Age-7 DoUnreplied-Yes Target-User_talk:Netsnipe/Archive_03--><!--END WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE--> | |||
| |archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}} | |||
| |maxarchivesize = 256K | |||
| |counter = 4 | |||
| |minthreadsleft = 4 | |||
| |minthreadstoarchive = 1 | |||
| |algo = old(14d) | |||
| |archive = User talk:Netsnipe/Archive %(counter)d | |||
| }} | |||
| == ]: Voting now open! == | |||
| ==Welcome message== | |||
| Thanks for , but I'm a little confused about why you included the welcome template (and at the top of my talk page). I've been an active user for around two years. ] '']'' 02:42, 1 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| {{Ivmbox|Hello, Netsnipe. Voting in the ''']''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. | |||
| :I drop a welcome onto any talk page where I don't see a one or a talk page ] link on when I'm unblocking. It's my routine to calm down people who've just been blocked. = ) -- <small><span style="border: 1px solid">] ]</span></small> 02:50, 1 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thats just stupid.--<small>]<sub>]</sub>|<sup>]</sup></small> 03:44, 1 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::Perhaps, I should clarify, "just been blocked '''by accident'''". -- <small><span style="border: 1px solid">] ]</span></small> 03:52, 1 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| ==Thanks== | |||
| Thanks for unblocking me!] 13:25, 1 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review ] and submit your choices on ''']'''. | |||
| ==]== | |||
| |Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
| how come ur so special u hav the anti vandal thing and i dont? plz unblock user the.chihuahua . he told me he gave out his password to some of his friends because they told him they could spice up his page and help him make contributions. so he gave out his password and then later he said he got messages that said that he was vandalizing pages he never even touched. he thinks it was his friends who he gave his password to. plz consider this. thanks. <small> — The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]){{#if:01:02, 3 December 2006 (UTC)| 01:02, 3 December 2006 (UTC)|}}.</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/2&oldid=750798221 --> | |||
| == ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message == | |||
| :See ]. As for ] (] <small>•</small> ]), he will never be unblocked since if what you say is indeed true then the security of that account can no longer be vouched for. An account's owner is solely responsible for all edits made under his or her name. -- <small><span style="border: 1px solid">]]</span></small> 15:46, 5 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| ==]== | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">]</div> | |||
| Hello! I just learned of wikipedia, and have been finding it very useful. I found a few articles that I thought should have been edited, so i took the liberty and edited them. One page that I edited on (eragon) was left the way I left it. But another page I made a minor change to was changed back, and then you banned me. This page was alchemy. I was wondering why you banned me, and when I will get editing priveleges back. | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| -Joehogian <small> — The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]){{#if:03:42, 3 December 2006 (UTC)| 03:42, 3 December 2006 (UTC)|}}.</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small> | |||
| :Hi, your is empty, so I've never blocked your account "Joehogian" before. Are you sure you weren't ] at the time instead? I can't review the block you're referring to unless you provide me with the full details including the reason and the IP address. -- <small><span style="border: 1px solid">] ]</span></small> 11:09, 3 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| </div> | |||
| ==Thanks== | |||
| </div> | |||
| Thanks for lifting the auto-block of my IP - I was shocked upon seeing that I had been blocked! :) – - <strong>] ]</strong> ] 07:30, 3 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2023/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1187131902 --> | |||
| == Invitation to participate in a research == | |||
| ==]== | |||
| Apparently the sockpuppet reporting page has not been visited by an admin in ages, so I just want to inform you about possible Alfredosolis sockpuppets as can be read ]. ] 06:32, 4 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Hello, | |||
| ==''Signpost'' updated for December 4th.== | |||
| {| width="90%" cellspacing="0" align="center" style="background-color:transparent;" | |||
| ! ]<font style="position: relative; top: .3em; font-size: 250%;">'''Weekly Delivery'''</font> | |||
| |} | |||
| <br> | |||
| {| width="90%" cellspacing="0" align="center" style="background-color:transparent;" | |||
| |- | |||
| | colspan=3 | | |||
| ---- | |||
| |- | |||
| | align="left" | '''Volume 2, Issue 49''' || align ="center" | '''] ]''' || align="right" | ''']''' | |||
| |- | |||
| | colspan=3 align=center | | |||
| ---- | |||
| |} | |||
| {| align="center" cellspacing="20" width=90% style="background-color:transparent;" | |||
| | width=50% | ] | |||
| | width=50% | ] | |||
| |- | |||
| | width=50% | ] | |||
| | width=50% | ] | |||
| |- | |||
| | width=50% | ] | |||
| | width=50% | ] | |||
| |- | |||
| | width=50% | ] | |||
| | width=50% | ] | |||
| |} | |||
| The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this ''''''. | |||
| {| width="90%" cellspacing="0" align="center" style="background-color:transparent;" | |||
| | colspan=2 | | |||
| ---- | |||
| |- | |||
| | align="left" | ''']''' | ] | ] | ] | ] | |||
| | align = "right" | <small>] : ]</small> | |||
| |- | |||
| | colspan=2 | | |||
| ---- | |||
| |} | |||
| <small>You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the ]. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. ] 05:46, 5 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| You do not have to be an Administrator to participate. | |||
| ==Page protection of ]== | |||
| Hello Netsnipe, | |||
| The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ] . | |||
| I noticed that you protected the page ]. I was the one that discovered ] and his various socks, and who posted about it on ] to get him blocked. | |||
| Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns. | |||
| Anyway, since this user is denying that he's Eowbotm1, it may be useful to post somewhere on his talk page, which is a diff of an edit where he admits that he is Eowbotm on his user page. I'd do this myself, but the page is protected, so your assistance in the matter would be appreciated. | |||
| Kind Regards, | |||
| Thanks in advance! — ] <sup><small>( ] | ])</small></sup> 07:57, 5 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| P.S. This is a . | |||
| <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC) </bdi> | |||
| :Follow up: Eowbotm's back on ] and vandalized your user page. He's blocked now though. —] <sup><small>( ] | ])</small></sup> 22:28, 5 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Potential_Admins&oldid=27650229 --> | |||
| == ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == | |||
| ==Reviewing blocks== | |||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| You said: "I'd also like to ask you that in future, for the sake of fairness and due process that you do not decline the unblock requests of users you block yourself unless the request is pure nonsense or abusive. From an ethical, reviews of blocks are meant to be carried out by a 3rd party." | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| :Will do. I thought it was pretty clear in this case, given the editor's user page (GNAA, etc., etc., etc.), that the unblock request was pure nonsense. Also, I was under the impression that the unblock request would still be visible and reviewed by other admins. I'll be more careful in the future. --] 16:28, 5 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> | |||
| == A DB-Attack Article == | |||
| </div> | |||
| Hello Netsnipe, this ] article has been up for some time now. Could you take a look at it please? Thank you.] <font color="purple">]</font> 06:20, 6 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| </div> | |||
| :] '''Done'''. -- <small><span style="border: 1px solid">]]</span></small> 06:23, 6 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1258243333 --> | |||
| ==Thanks== | |||
| Thanks for unblocking me again!] 14:26, 6 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Block/unblock feature == | |||
| I know it's been a while, but I've completed the feature you requested, which queries whether the user is blocked or unblocked before directing to the appropriate page. It should work with any user page, including redirects. | |||
| It may still have a bug or two, so if you find errors, let me know, along with which page you were on, what your error console/dialog returned as the error, and which browser you're using. | |||
| Thanks very much for your idea, and I hope the new feature works as you hoped. <font color="#FF0000">]</font> <font size="1">(]) <font color="#00FF00">]</font></font> 17:02, 6 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks, but unfortunately, it doesn't work properly. It always brings up ] regardless of whether a user is blocked or not. Would you like me to lend you my account for a day so you can debug it? -- <small><span style="border: 1px solid">]]</span></small> 13:44, 7 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::Strange, it works OK for me. For blocked users, it goes straight to the unblock page. | |||
| ::Go to a blocked user's user (talk) page and use User options > Vandals > Current block list. Does the page look like this? ] | |||
| ::Probably a silly question, but could you try Ctrl-F5ing? | |||
| ::As for the 2 errors, the first is a global CSS error that's not my doing, I actually reported it this morning to ] but was told that it's going to stay there as it's not causing any harm. | |||
| ::I noticed the second error yesterday, as it was the first time that I gave myself "admin" powers on the tool. The script looks for an undelete tab to remove, even if one doesn't exist. Shouldn't be too hard to remove. | |||
| ::Let me know what happens with Ctrl-F5. Oh, another thought: hovering over the "Block/unblock" link, do you get an HTTP or Javascript link coming up in the statusbar? Anyway, get back to me. ] 16:11, 7 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::JS error fixed. Clearly I can't do anything about the CSS error, it's nothing to do with me... I still can't see any reason why "block/unblock" shouldn't be working. Try Ctrl-F5; if that fails, then ding me again. ] 16:36, 7 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Fixed it! You admin types get an extra "block" link which threw my script right off. Should be fine now. <font color="#FF0000">]</font> <font size="1">(]) <font color="#00FF00">]</font></font> 16:44, 7 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] 165.21.0.0/16 == | |||
| Thanks, but I believe it should be 165.21.'''155'''.0/16? If there is an increase in vandalism, remove it from the whitelist, I will use secure login. --] ] 13:58, 7 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :SingNet owns 165.21.0.0 - 165.21.255.255. See ] for more details. -- <small><span style="border: 1px solid">]]</span></small> 14:01, 7 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == 84.114.131.26 == | |||
| Well, my suspicions panned out (I hate when that happens). {{Vandal|Universalgenius}} is definitely an Enlighter1 sock and he's coming from the usual place. I've blocked indefinitely as it's obviously a static IP. ] ] 14:05, 7 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :You may want to run a checkuser on {{checkuser|Leaderofall}} then. Likely a sleeper account in that case. How did you detect that the host was compromised in the first place? Just intuition? -- <small><span style="border: 1px solid">]]</span></small> 14:09, 7 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == A sock tagging == | |||
| Howdy, you may not remember this, but I'm trying to track down information on why {{user|Flinders}} was as a sock of {{user|Mattisse}}. Was there a RFCU to back this up? The RFCU for Mattisse does not list or confirm this account, and there is no RFCU for Flinders. --<font color="3300FF">] </font> 15:29, 7 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :] (] <small>•</small> ]) ran the . -- <small><span style="border: 1px solid">]]</span></small> 15:49, 7 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Thanks== | |||
| Thank you for blocking that sock account. I appreciate it. --] 01:05, 8 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Not the first time== | |||
| ...that he's tried this ruse. makes interesting reading. ] ] 05:22, 8 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == God's country ? == | |||
| I was doing a little bit of work on the ] page, and out of curiosity did a search on "God's country" to see if anything had been written about their slogan. I found it and its variations were permanently blocked. But I can't see the history. What, pray tell, happened on those pages to compel you or someone else to take such action? ] 05:48, 8 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :There's never been an article on "]". It's always been the battleground of a silly edit war with anonymous users continuing to redirect it to articles such as ], ], ], and even ] and has been deleted about 5 times already. If you think you can write a neutral and sourced article about the phrase, please send me a draft and I'll unlock it for you. Thanks. -- <small><span style="border: 1px solid">]]</span></small> 07:01, 8 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Smile == | |||
| <div style="float:center;border-style:solid;border-color:blue;background-color:AliceBlue;border-width:1px;text-align:left;padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">] | |||
| {{{1|] ]}}} has smiled at you! Smiles promote ] and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. <small>Smile at others by adding {{tls|smile}}, {{tls|smile2}} or {{tls|smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.</small> Happy editing! {{{2|}}} | |||
| </div><!-- Template:smile --> | |||
| == God's country? == | |||
| Thanks for the note, and for reformatting my talk page. :) No, it's not worth reviving and risking an edit war just to expand on a beer commercial. I was just curious if there was anything about it, as it's apparently a frequently-used phrase. Everyone thinks his homeland is "God's country", I suppose... along with the ironic use, such as ] in ''Animal Crackers'' (1930 or so), as "Captain Spaulding, the African Explorer", telling his audience, "Africa is God's country... ''and He can have it!''" No, let's leave this one alone. :) ] 12:27, 8 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Thanks== | |||
| Many thanks for your quick action. huongthao 14:25, 8 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hi, I don't know if you saw it, but this user previously asked to be unblocked and the unblock was declined. He removed the decline template to ask again. -- ] <sup>]</sup> 17:30, 8 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Crap I missed it. Oh well, I've already ], and I will be keeping an eye out on that account anyway. Thanks for the heads up. -- <small><span style="border: 1px solid">]]</span></small> 17:32, 8 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Deleting old instructions == | |||
| There is no reason to delete things like ]. Just tag it as historical. —]→] • 17:35, 8 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Thanks == | |||
| Doh-eth! I missed the fact that ] was a shared/school IP, which was why I blocked for so long. Thanks for catching and fixing my error! --]]]<sup><small>(])</small></sup> 19:01, 8 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==On a personal level== | |||
| On a personal level Netsnipe, thank you for taking care of ] and his vandalizing of articles and my personal page. It's nice to know that such behaviour is watched by those in power. God Bless. -- ] 07:48, December 9, 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| Thank you for unblocking me.How do I make a user page? I don't see any thing to edit one. ] 13:46, 9 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :]. Unregistered users don't get user pages. -- <small><span style="border: 1px solid">]]</span></small> 13:49, 9 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Re: 58.106.134.127 == | |||
| Hi! Sorry we overlapped on their talk page. Should someone file a SSP report on this IP range? I've never done that. Or maybe an RfC? Let me know what I can do. Thanks! <font color="silver">-</font><font color="silver">-</font> '''] <sup>]</sup><sup><font color="silver">|</font></sup><sup>]</sup>''' <font color="silver">-</font><font color="silver">-</font> 14:32, 9 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :There's no actual sockpuppetry as yet. Just anonymous IP vandalism. ] will hopefully put a quick stop to that. -- <small><span style="border: 1px solid">]]</span></small> 14:37, 9 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::Check out the contrib links on ] talk page. I even tried a ...I don't think this vandal will "go quietly into that good night". <font color="silver">-</font><font color="silver">-</font> '''] <sup>]</sup><sup><font color="silver">|</font></sup><sup>]</sup>''' <font color="silver">-</font><font color="silver">-</font> 14:41, 9 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| Thanks for the heads-up. You don't find the editing patterns to be a bit, um, disturbing? Users who show up out of the blue and become heavy participants in a contentious AfD, showing good knowledge of Misplaced Pages guidelines (like notability), scream "shenanigans" to me, at least. (I'm not disputing the unblock; I'm a new admin and am looking for feedback.) | ] <small>]</small> 15:04, 9 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :There's a difference between ] and ]. You only block the latter if CheckUser proves it or they're being obviously disruptive. Don't forget that friends do ask their friends to help stack votes on Misplaced Pages, but sometimes those friends editing Misplaced Pages for the first time stay. If I were you, I wouldn't block any AFD sockpuppets on suspicion alone if they're not vandalising etc. Just use the {{]}} and {{]}} and the closing admin will ignore them. It's just not the risk ]. As for the AFD you're handling, you can blame that on the trolls and their ] -- just treat them as ]. -- <small><span style="border: 1px solid">]]</span></small> 15:15, 9 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::OK, good to know. The other two accounts I blocked were clearly SPAs (and in hindsight, I should have identified them as such), so I'm comfortable with those. Thanks again. | ] <small>]</small> 15:18, 9 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == IP blocks. == | |||
| Gotcha. I've restored the block at one week, leaving account creation open as well. The indef was inadvertent; I thought I had set it to a finite duration but obviously selected the wrong item in the pull-down menu. | ] <small>]</small> 18:00, 9 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :PS, if you think a shorter block is in order, go ahead. I was just looking for something long enough to discourage the editor in question from continuing his assault on Embraer-related articles. | ] <small>]</small> 18:02, 9 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| There was no point reblocking <span class="plainlinks">] (] • ] • • • • ] • <font color="002bb8"></font>)</span> at all. If you hadn't noticed from the edits to your talk page, he/she had already forced an IP change to <span class="plainlinks">] (] • ] • • • • ] • <font color="002bb8"></font>)</span>. In these situations, ] is much more useful than blocks. -- <small><span style="border: 1px solid">]]</span></small> 18:12, 9 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Semi-protecting a half-dozen or more pages seemed like a bad idea to me; why deny other editors the chance to make legitimate edits? If the user in question starts his shenanigans again from the new IP address, I would temporarily block that one as well (would a few hours be more appropriate?) - but so far, s/he hasn't done so, but has been quite reasonable in discussing the matter. You can just respond here, BTW - no need to repost on my talk page. | ] <small>]</small> 18:23, 9 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| You've got a equally good point as well.I was thinking you might have resorted to a range block instead. If the user persists, bring it up at ]. -- <small><span style="border: 1px solid">]]</span></small> 18:28, 9 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==TRN UK== | |||
| '''TRN UK''' got recreated by a User whose name is eerily similar to that of the now-blocked hoaxer who created the article originally. Think this one should be blocked as well? ]|] 20:05, 9 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Thanks == | |||
| Thanks for removing my autoblock.<br>] <sup>(]) ()</sup> 22:09, 9 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Admin help. == | |||
| OK, I think I need to undo a bad page move (] -> ]). There have been a few edits since then, but it will be easy to re-create them after the undo. What's the best procedure? Rollback the current article (RoC) then move it? I want to make sure I preserve page histories etc. Complicating it is that ] is now a dab page with its own small history. Thanks. | ] <small>]</small> 23:30, 9 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Based on the tickings off and super-fast reverts I encountered from the editors of the dab page, I think it's fair to assume that they want the old state of affairs back. Most of the post-30 November edit history looks eminently discardable. I'd suggest just zapping ], reverting the move, and rolling back the edits to the pre-move state. According me, the last pre-move versions are: | |||
| :* http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Czech_and_Slovak_Federal_Republic&oldid=86060429 | |||
| :* http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Republic_of_Czechoslovakia&oldid=90941187 | |||
| :* http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Czechoslovak_Socialist_Republic&oldid=86679291 | |||
| :But you might want to double-check that. Apologies for stating the bloody obvious (like Sybil Fawlty, I could compete in the Olympics at that). If ] (] <small>•</small> ]) is unhappy, perhaps xe won't do this sort of thing again. ] ] 01:15, 10 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::OK, I took a whack at this last night, and started a new discussion at ]. I think we're all set, but if you notice I did something wrong, let me know. It appears that all the edit histories are where they belong. | ] <small>]</small> 18:06, 10 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Weren't you a little quick on that one? He didn't add any links after he was warned. -]<sup>]|]</sup> 08:57, 10 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Unblocked. Thanks for picking that up. -- <small><span style="border: 1px solid">]]</span></small> 08:59, 10 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Yes indeed... Please remove Fengshui88's IP address from the "spam" list as it appears you have inadvertently blocked the wrong address. I cannot currently perform any edits. Thanks. -- ] 11:16, December 10, 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :If you are currently blocked, then could you please tell me how you are able to edit my talk page? -- <small><span style="border: 1px solid">]]</span></small> 11:48, 10 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| this user is deleting stats from careers of sportsmen. should i revert it? ] 11:51, 10 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Have you tried communicating with him via his talkpage first? -- <small><span style="border: 1px solid">]]</span></small> 11:52, 10 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::not yet. i'll do it now. if i may ask you to reply on my talk page. thx ] 11:53, 10 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::thanks for welcome. i contacted this user. i'll report you soon about what he/she said. regards, ] 11:55, 10 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::sorry if i'm boring, but here is reply from ip user: ] 12:00, 10 December 2006 (UTC) <br> | |||
| <nowiki>== 06-07 stats ==</nowiki> | |||
| ] | |||
| ''As well, please refrain from updating stats mid-season, as it complicates things and Misplaced Pages's purpose is not to provide up-to-the-date statistics.'' | |||
| --] 11:57, 10 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Deletion== | |||
| why has my page on wikipedia been deleted? (]) | |||
| a lot of companies have a history and ours is a website that promotes local culture. If the wording was not properly said, then I can reword. | |||
| Then how come other companies like these exist: | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| What is the difference between these companies and our website? | |||
| Thanks | |||
| Neville <small> — The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]) 17:37, 10 December 2006 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned --> | |||
| :Your article failed to establish the notability of your company as required by the criteria set out in the ] guidelines. You should also note that ] will be deleted for failing the ] policy. If you wish to appeal my deletion, please file an appeal at ]. -- <small><span style="border: 1px solid">]]</span></small> 17:52, 10 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Hi Kangroo Man== | |||
| You have been assisting some anti-Turkish vandals with your unwelcome support concerning user page ]. Can you explain to the media why you allow Khoikhoi's deletion of legitimate entries in the pertinent user talk page as well as guiding us whom to approach to put a cap on your nonsense there and some other blocking activity on good-faith edits? Thank you. <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (]) 19:01, 10 December 2006 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned --> | |||
| Oh, before I forget. Please post your reply here before or after you attempt to block this user to cover up. Thanks. | |||
| :You seem to be confusing me with someone else. Please provide specific diffs to support your allegations and I shall respond to your queries. I also do not appreciate being interrogated by an anonymous IP, so if you would disclose your identity or at least ], I will be more willing to some assume good faith regarding your questions rather than dismiss you as an ]. -- <small><span style="border: 1px solid">]]</span></small> 19:09, 10 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:160.79.139.10&action=history | |||
| and a number of rejections by you on appeals against hostile blocks of contributors who made only good faith edits trying to correct anti-turkish propaganda practices. It appears that you upheld arbitrarily these blocks in the past without being able to provide any link to any offending other users.Also, what is the meaning and true purpose of your labeling IP addresses? (just curious, I think it is just fine if it was the case for all IP addresses - but when not, alterior motive is obvious) ] 19:15, 10 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Thank you for proving to the whole world my point with your ill behaviour referenced below: | |||
| # (cur) (last) 19:12, 10 December 2006 Netsnipe (Talk | contribs) m (Protected User talk:160.79.139.10: Prevent 3rd party from tampering with talk page ) | |||
| # (cur) (last) 19:12, 10 December 2006 Netsnipe (Talk | contribs) (Revert to revision 93047851 dated 2006-12-09 00:34:06 by Netsnipe using popups) | |||
| # (cur) (last) 19:06, 10 December 2006 81.131.101.50 (Talk) (deleting entries from talk pages is a violation of wikipedia rules and considered vandalism. please do not do again. thanks) | |||
| # (cur) (last) 00:34, 9 December 2006 Netsnipe (Talk | contribs) (Retag SharedIPEDU) | |||
| No wonder great projects like Misplaced Pages comes from my land and my people, United States, rather than the parazites of the south hemisphere. <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]) 19:25, December 11, 2006 (UTC{{{3|}}})</small> | |||
| :Are you blind? Look at my edits carefully: | |||
| :* http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:160.79.139.10&diff=93047851&oldid=93043351 | |||
| :* http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:160.79.139.10&diff=88215365&oldid=87999513 | |||
| :Do you even know what ] is? Read it. I have not provided any support to ] (] <small>•</small> ]) in whatever nationalistic dispute you are involved in and up until now have not removed text from ] except because as 81.131.101.50 you have no right to be editing any talk page apart from someone you are in direct contact with. As for tagging IP addresses, it's ] to identify schools and ] because multiple people edit from the same IP address. Look through my ] and you'll see I tag dozens of talk pages of school IPs every day. You seem to have no idea how ] works, nor what is involved in working ]. And you're paranoid if you think I'm anti-Turkish. I'm on the other side of the world and I don't fucking care -- I deny unblocking to anyone who violates ] as ] (] <small>•</small> ]) has on many occasions. Its simple -- if someone can't follow the correct policies and procedures of Misplaced Pages like everyone else can, then they're no longer welcome here regardless of their sex, race, nationality, religion or creed. -- <small><span style="border: 1px solid">]]</span></small> 19:30, 10 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Who told you that you were anti Turkish? Talk about paranoya. LOL. Study my entries. Read carefully, you were asked to defend yourself, not continue to offend, at your talk page, not mine. You are full of shit, must be your affinity to your kangroos at your back yard. Who are you referring as sockpuppets and what was your evidence other than your above portrayed vulgarity and vandal attitute?] 19:36, 10 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Look, if you were upfront about which unblock requests I've declined that make you so disgruntled, then maybe I could explain myself properly, but all you're doing is being hypocritical by violating ] by calling me "full of shit" and attacking my nationality. I would appreciate it if you weren't so cowardly as to continue attacking me as an anonymous IP. At least I am extending the courtesy of hearing you out and not blocking you immediately. The very least you can do in return is stop hiding, log in and file a complaint at the proper channels such as ] or ]. -- <small><span style="border: 1px solid">]]</span></small> 19:44, 10 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| I just got curious about your sockpuppet comments and studied your behaviour for curiosity. Your log shows the following involvement. It appears that you sustained Bertil Videt's denial of his own entries (means lying in your polite down under language), his mutilation of his entries from the other talk page, as well as covering up khoikhoi's assistance. All other irelevent comentary by you only reflects on you and those you are assisting. | |||
| 1. (cur) (last) 15:26, 16 November 2006 Netsnipe (Talk | contribs) (unblock DECLINED) | |||
| 2. (cur) (last) 14:26, 16 November 2006 M4URIZ (Talk | contribs) (Not another user new name assumption, not sockpuppetting; unblock requested with references) | |||
| 3. (cur) (last) 14:10, 16 November 2006 Netsnipe (Talk | contribs) (Revert to revision 88067951 dated 2006-11-15 21:41:32 by Daniel.Bryant using popups) | |||
| 4. (cur) (last) 19:36, 15 November 2006 Bertilvidet (Talk | contribs) (rm posts in my name that I have not submitted) | |||
| 5. (cur) (last) 18:25, 15 November 2006 M4URIZ (Talk | contribs) (who is 172Gal? has nothing to do with IP either.) | |||
| 6. (cur) (last) 18:13, 15 November 2006 M4URIZ (Talk | contribs) (no sockpuppet activity here, requests unblock and address to 3RR violation at Ataturk page.) | |||
| Thanks again for helping me prove my points further. | |||
| (By the way, study Khoikhoi's last few days block history. The fool now thinks that everyone endorsing an edit to tease him is 172GAL, enjoying his trigger happiness. He is the anti-Turk, not you (you fit to another category) Take care. ] 19:56, 10 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :You're sadly mistakened. Check the histories of Bertilvidet's userpages. I've never talked to that user before let alone edited any common articles -- I don't know him at all. Take a look at my editing history -- I spend my time reviewing unblock requests and lifting ]. Autoblocks occur when an user is automatically blocked because he/she shares the same ] as another blocked user. It's my job to assess whether an IP is shared or not by running ] and ] lookups among other things. Here's the and for 160.79.139.10 which tells me it belongs to a teaching hospital...so I tag the IP address as such so when one student vandalises Misplaced Pages and gets blocked, the vandal doesn't end up getting the whole school blocked. Can't you see that I'm not involved in whatever crazy conspiracy you've imagined me being part of? Does any of this make sense to you? -- <small><span style="border: 1px solid">]]</span></small> 20:09, 10 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| I think you exactly know what I am referring to in my above list of references with your blocking and sustaining activity against M4URIZ as just one example (dont have time for more now). You made your paranoid comments about your misinterpretations on who might be that 172GAL. Thats for your pseudopsychologist hobby side. ] 20:20, 10 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Personal attacks | |||
| Personal attacks have no place on Misplaced Pages, and you will get blocked in short order if you persist with them. Rich Farmbrough, 20:13 10 December 2006 (GMT). | |||
| I believe you are referring to NetSnipe's remarks of 'fucking' and 'you are paranoid', right? | |||
| There's no point blocking. This user is trolling from a British Telecom dialup address (dial81-131-101-50.in-addr.btopenworld.com). He/she will just disconnect and reconnect to get another IP address if blocked. The only thing I can do if I get sick of the harassment to contact BT's abuse department myself and have their ISP contract terminated. -- Netsnipe ► 20:19, 10 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Harrasment? What are your referring to? The whole world is already reading this. | |||
Latest revision as of 13:10, 19 November 2024
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
| This is Netsnipe's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 14 days  |
Picture of the day
George Norman Barnard (December 23, 1819 – February 4, 1902) was an American photographer who was one of the first to use daguerreotype, the first commercially available form of photography, in the United States. A fire in 1853 destroyed the grain elevators in Oswego, New York, an event Barnard photographed. Historians consider these some of the first "news" photographs. Barnard also photographed Abraham Lincoln's 1861 inauguration. Barnard is best known for American Civil War era photos. He was the official army photographer for the Military Division of the Mississippi commanded by Union general William T. Sherman; his 1866 book, Photographic Views of Sherman's Campaign, showed the devastation of the war. This photograph, by Mathew Brady, shows Barnard c. 1865.Photograph credit: Mathew Brady; restored by Adam Cuerden
Archive – More featured pictures...
|
|
| Category tracker |
|---|
| Welcome to Misplaced Pages |
|---|
Note: Noldoaran welcomed me back all the way on November 21, 2003, but I use {{welcomec}} as my own set of bookmarks.
Welcome!Hello Netsnipe! Welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions to this 💕. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need any help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking |
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Netsnipe. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in a research
Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC)