Revision as of 19:02, 11 January 2020 editSammi Brie (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Template editors150,081 edits Adding local short description: "Stylized lotus flower used as the seat or base for a figure", overriding Wikidata description "In Asian art a lotus throne is a stylized lotus flower used as the seat or base for a figure" (Shortdesc helper)← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 15:03, 6 November 2024 edit undoMonkbot (talk | contribs)Bots3,695,952 editsm Task 20: replace {lang-??} templates with {langx|??} ‹See Tfd› (Replaced 1);Tag: AWB | ||
(57 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{short description|Stylized lotus flower used as the seat or base for a figure}} | {{short description|Stylized lotus flower used as the seat or base for a figure in Asian art}} | ||
], Eastern India, c. 1000.]] | ], Eastern India, c. 1000.]] | ||
The '''lotus throne''', sometimes called '''lotus platform''', is a stylized lotus flower used as the seat or base for a figure in art associated with ]. It is the normal ] for divine figures in ] and ], and often seen in ].<ref>Pal, 39</ref> Originating in ], it followed ] to ] in particular. | |||
⚫ | ]'', the ]; its colour range is from white to red]] | ||
The precise form varies, but is intended to represent the opening flower of '']'', the ] |
The precise form varies, but is intended to represent the opening flower of '']'', the ]. In the traditional biographies lotus flowers sprung up at ]'s first seven steps, and in some Buddhist legends the baby ] emerged from a lotus flower. The Indian lotus is an aquatic plant similar to a ], though not actually any close relation. It has a large, round, and flat ] in the centre of the flower, with initially small openings above each of the relatively small number of seeds. Among other unusual characteristics, ''nelumbo nucifera'' has particular properties of repelling water, known as the ] or ]. Among other symbolic meanings, it rises above the water environment it lives in, and is not contaminated by it, so providing a model for Buddhists.<ref>Pal, 39–42; Coomaraswamy, 21; Krishan & Tadikonda, 65; Rodrigues</ref> According to the ], the Buddha himself began this often-repeated metaphor, in the ], saying that the lotus flower raises from the muddy water unstained, as he raises from this world, free from the defilements taught in the ].<ref>Pal, 39–40; Coomaraswamy, 21; the texts are: AN 10.81, "Bāhuna suttaṃ"; AN 4.36, "Doṇa suttaṃ".</ref> | ||
In ] the throne is called either a '' |
In ] the throne is called either a '']'' ({{langx|sa|पद्मासन}}, {{IPA|sa|pɐdmaːsɐnɐ|}}, '']'' is the name for a seated position), which is also the name for the ] in meditation and ], or ''padmapitha'',<ref>Jansen, 18</ref> ''padma'' meaning lotus and ''pitha'' a base or plinth.<ref>Pal, 45</ref> | ||
==History== | ==History== | ||
The earliest of the ]s, the '']'', describes the other gods watching the birth of ], the god of fire, seated on lotus flowers; also the birth of ]. |
The earliest of the ]s, the '']'', describes the other gods watching the birth of ], the god of fire, seated on lotus flowers; also the birth of ].<ref>Coomaraswamy, 18–19; Pal, 40</ref> In Hindu myth, the major deity ] emerged from a lotus growing from the navel of ].<ref>Pal, 40</ref> | ||
⚫ | ], 11th century]] | ||
⚫ | ]'', the ]; its colour range is from white to red]] | ||
In art the form is first seen as a base for rare early images of ] from the 2nd century BCE; many or most of these may have a Buddhist context. |
In art the form is first seen as a base for rare early images of ] from the 2nd century BCE; many or most of these may have a Buddhist context.<ref>Coomaraswamy, 22; Krishan & Tadikonda, 78, note 89</ref> However it first becomes common with seated ] figures in the ] of ] around the late 2nd or the 3rd century CE.<ref>Moore & Klein, 149; Krishan & Tadikonda, 65</ref> It may have reached the ] as early as the end of the 2nd century.<ref>Pal, 41; Walser, 80–87</ref> At some point, probably around 200, and before his death in about 250, the Buddhist thinker ] exhorted an unknown Buddhist monarch, very probably in the Deccan, to: | ||
<blockquote>... Please construct from all precious substances | <blockquote>... Please construct from all precious substances | ||
Images of Buddha with fine proportions | Images of Buddha with fine proportions | ||
Well designed and sitting on lotuses ... |
Well designed and sitting on lotuses ...<ref>Walser, 80, 86–87 for the date</ref></blockquote> | ||
– suggesting this ] was current by then. It is not clear from the language whether sculptures or paintings, or both, were meant.<ref>Walser, 81–83</ref> | |||
In early Buddhist art it may be intended to specifically depict the second of ]s in the legend of the Buddha's life. In some accounts of this, when engaged in a contest with sorcerers, the Buddha multiplied himself into other bodies, which sat or stood on lotus flowers. |
In early Buddhist art it may be intended to specifically depict the second of ]s in the legend of the Buddha's life. In some accounts of this, when engaged in a contest with sorcerers, the Buddha multiplied himself into other bodies, which sat or stood on lotus flowers.<ref>Krishan & Tadikonda, 67</ref> It became used for other Buddhist figures, and adopted for other Hindu deities than ]. | ||
==Form== | ==Form== | ||
The throne in art evolved to be rather distant from the actual plant. In historic sculpture there is very often a clear dividing line about halfway up; this type is called a "double-lotus" (''vishvapadma'') pedestal or throne. |
The throne in art evolved to be rather distant from the actual plant. In historic sculpture there is very often a clear dividing line about halfway up; this type is called a "double-lotus" (''vishvapadma'') pedestal or throne.<ref>Lerner & Kossak, Nos. 68, 84, 88, 89, 92, 94, 97, 101 (for ''vishvapadma''), 110, 111, 113 etc.</ref> Most often petal shapes both rise and fall from the dividing line, but sometimes the upper part of the throne represents the prominent flat-topped seed head as a base for the figure, perhaps with circles for the holes holding the seeds, as in maturing lotus heads.<ref>Lerner & Kossak, Nos. 133, 139, 140; Hāṇḍā, Omacanda, ''Gaddi Land in Chamba: Its History, Art & Culture : New Light on the Early Wooden Temples'', 78–79, 2005, Indus Publishing, {{ISBN|8173871744}}, 9788173871740, </ref> | ||
The ] is a particular strain with two back-to-back flowers on each stem, but it is not clear if this influenced the form in art. In ]n paintings, and also modern Hindu paintings, the lotus throne is often depicted more realistically in terms of its shape (not its size). | |||
⚫ | <gallery widths="200px"> | ||
⚫ | <gallery widths="200px" heights="200px"> | ||
⚫ | File:Shri Lakshmi Lustrated by Elephants (Gaja-Lakshmi) LACMA M.85.62 (cropped).jpg|], 1st century BCE, ], 14.61 cm tall. |
||
⚫ | File:Shri Lakshmi Lustrated by Elephants (Gaja-Lakshmi) LACMA M.85.62 (cropped).jpg|], 1st century BCE, ], 14.61 cm tall.<ref>Pal, 40</ref> | ||
File:Dinar of Chandragupta II LACMA M.77.55.20 (2 of 3) (cropped).jpg|Gold dinar coin of ], reigned c. 375–c. 415 CE | File:Dinar of Chandragupta II LACMA M.77.55.20 (2 of 3) (cropped).jpg|Gold dinar coin of ], reigned c. 375–c. 415 CE | ||
File:Shiva as the Lord of Dance LACMA.jpg|Restrained double-lotus throne typical of ], when they have them at all. Shiva ], 10th century. | File:Shiva as the Lord of Dance LACMA.jpg|Restrained double-lotus throne typical of ], when they have them at all. Shiva ], 10th century. | ||
⚫ | File:The Hindu Goddess Parvati LACMA M.77.82 (3 of 12).jpg|Double-thrones under ], 11th century | ||
File:Juntei Kannon.jpg|], 12th-century Japan | File:Juntei Kannon.jpg|], 12th-century Japan | ||
File:Tibet, mahakala sotto l'aspetto di ye-shes mgon-po, xii sec.JPG|Apart from the three figures, the pendent foot of this 12th-century Tibetan ] has its own throne | File:Tibet, mahakala sotto l'aspetto di ye-shes mgon-po, xii sec.JPG|Apart from the three figures, the pendent foot of this 12th-century Tibetan ] has its own throne | ||
Line 40: | Line 42: | ||
==Representing the whole plant== | ==Representing the whole plant== | ||
], lustrated by elephants. ], Stupa 3 gateway, probably 1st century CE]] | ], lustrated by elephants. ], Stupa 3 gateway, probably 1st century CE]] | ||
The vast majority of lotus thrones just depict an isolated flower |
The vast majority of lotus thrones just depict an isolated flower or a group of flowers under different figures. But some images depict more of the plant. A famous relief of ] in Cave 16 at ] shows a pond of lotus leaves and budding flowers as a vertical panel below the throne.<ref>Michell, 362</ref> | ||
] Buddha, 11th century]] | ] Buddha, 11th century]] | ||
⚫ | Other compositions show stalks, buds and flowers reaching up beside a main figure. |
||
⚫ | Other compositions show stalks, buds and flowers reaching up beside a main figure.<ref>Lerner & Kossak, Nos. 116, 117, 119</ref> These may terminate in a flower held by the main figure,<ref>Pal, 39</ref> especially if it is ] or from the 5th or 6th century Vishnu, (both also having the epithet Padmapani, "lotus holder"),<ref>Pal, 41</ref> or in another lotus throne behind the hand, if it is outstretched in a ]. Alternatively, stalks may climb up to support lotus thrones underneath minor, smaller, figures, as in the early terracotta plaque illustrated above, where stalks rise at the side to support the elephants lustrating Gaja-Laxmi. This is seen in the 1st century BCE terracotta plaque illustrated above.<ref>Pal, 40</ref> The ] stone relief illustrated here shows a similar composition with ]. Above or below the water, the stems may be supported by small ''naga'' figures.<ref>Coomaraswamy, 53</ref> | ||
⚫ | The lotus plant in lotus thrones is often imagined as growing out of the ], and a few images represent the plant below the water level, with a stem also representing the ]. |
||
⚫ | The lotus plant in lotus thrones is often imagined as growing out of the ], and a few images represent the plant below the water level, with a stem also representing the ].<ref>Coomaraswamy, 20, 53–55</ref> | ||
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
Line 50: | Line 53: | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
⚫ | {{commons category}} | ||
* |
*], ''Elements of Buddhist Iconography'', Harvard University Press, 1935, | ||
* |
*Jansen, Eva Rudy, ''The Book of Hindu Imagery: The Gods and their Symbols'', 1993, Binkey Kok Publications, {{ISBN|9074597076}}, 9789074597074, | ||
* |
*Krishan, Yuvrajmm, Tadikonda, Kalpana K., ''The Buddha Image: Its Origin and Development'', 1996, Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, {{ISBN|8121505658}}, 9788121505659, | ||
* |
*Lerner, Martin and Kossak, Steven, ''The Lotus Transcendent: Indian and Southeast Asian Art from the Samuel Eilenberg Collection'', 1991, Metropolitan Museum of Art (New York, N.Y.), {{ISBN|0870996134}}, 9780870996139, | ||
* |
*Michell, George (1990), ''The Penguin Guide to the Monuments of India, Volume 1: Buddhist, Jain, Hindu'', 1990, Penguin Books, {{ISBN|0140081445}} | ||
* |
*Moore, Albert C., Klein, Charlotte, ''Iconography of Religions: An Introduction'', 1977, Chris Robertson, {{ISBN|0800604881}}, 9780800604882, | ||
* |
*Pal, Pratapaditya, ''Indian Sculpture: Circa 500 B.C.-A.D. 700'', Volume 1 of ''Indian Sculpture: A Catalogue of the Los Angeles County Museum of Art Collection'', 1986, Los Angeles County Museum of Art/University of California Press, {{ISBN|0520059913}}, 9780520059917, | ||
* |
*Rodrigues, H, , ''Mahavidya'', 2016 | ||
* |
*Walser, Joseph, ''Nagarjuna in Context: Mahayana Buddhism and Early Indian Culture'', 2005, Columbia University Press, {{ISBN|0231506236}}, 9780231506236, | ||
* {{cite book | last = Hāṇḍā | first = Omacanda | title = Gaddi Land in Chamba: Its History, Art & Culture : New Light on the Early Wooden Temples | pages= 78–79 | year = 2005 | publisher =Indus Publishing | isbn = 9788173871740 | url = https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=2EaFNQ7Zfl8C&pg=PA78}} | |||
==External links== | |||
⚫ | |||
] | ] | ||
Line 68: | Line 69: | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 15:03, 6 November 2024
Stylized lotus flower used as the seat or base for a figure in Asian artThe lotus throne, sometimes called lotus platform, is a stylized lotus flower used as the seat or base for a figure in art associated with Indian religions. It is the normal pedestal for divine figures in Buddhist art and Hindu art, and often seen in Jain art. Originating in Indian art, it followed Indian religions to East Asia in particular.
The precise form varies, but is intended to represent the opening flower of Nelumbo nucifera, the Indian lotus. In the traditional biographies lotus flowers sprung up at the Buddha's first seven steps, and in some Buddhist legends the baby Padmasambhava emerged from a lotus flower. The Indian lotus is an aquatic plant similar to a water lily, though not actually any close relation. It has a large, round, and flat seed head in the centre of the flower, with initially small openings above each of the relatively small number of seeds. Among other unusual characteristics, nelumbo nucifera has particular properties of repelling water, known as the lotus effect or ultrahydrophobicity. Among other symbolic meanings, it rises above the water environment it lives in, and is not contaminated by it, so providing a model for Buddhists. According to the Pali Canon, the Buddha himself began this often-repeated metaphor, in the Aṅguttara Nikāya, saying that the lotus flower raises from the muddy water unstained, as he raises from this world, free from the defilements taught in the sutra.
In Sanskrit the throne is called either a padmāsana (Sanskrit: पद्मासन, [pɐdmaːsɐnɐ], āsana is the name for a seated position), which is also the name for the Lotus position in meditation and yoga, or padmapitha, padma meaning lotus and pitha a base or plinth.
History
The earliest of the Vedas, the Rigveda, describes the other gods watching the birth of Agni, the god of fire, seated on lotus flowers; also the birth of Vasishtha. In Hindu myth, the major deity Brahma emerged from a lotus growing from the navel of Vishnu.
In art the form is first seen as a base for rare early images of Laxmi from the 2nd century BCE; many or most of these may have a Buddhist context. However it first becomes common with seated Buddha figures in the Greco-Buddhist art of Gandhara around the late 2nd or the 3rd century CE. It may have reached the Deccan as early as the end of the 2nd century. At some point, probably around 200, and before his death in about 250, the Buddhist thinker Nagarjuna exhorted an unknown Buddhist monarch, very probably in the Deccan, to:
... Please construct from all precious substances
Images of Buddha with fine proportions
Well designed and sitting on lotuses ...
– suggesting this iconography was current by then. It is not clear from the language whether sculptures or paintings, or both, were meant.
In early Buddhist art it may be intended to specifically depict the second of the Twin Miracles in the legend of the Buddha's life. In some accounts of this, when engaged in a contest with sorcerers, the Buddha multiplied himself into other bodies, which sat or stood on lotus flowers. It became used for other Buddhist figures, and adopted for other Hindu deities than Lakshmi.
Form
The throne in art evolved to be rather distant from the actual plant. In historic sculpture there is very often a clear dividing line about halfway up; this type is called a "double-lotus" (vishvapadma) pedestal or throne. Most often petal shapes both rise and fall from the dividing line, but sometimes the upper part of the throne represents the prominent flat-topped seed head as a base for the figure, perhaps with circles for the holes holding the seeds, as in maturing lotus heads.
The bingdi lotus is a particular strain with two back-to-back flowers on each stem, but it is not clear if this influenced the form in art. In East Asian paintings, and also modern Hindu paintings, the lotus throne is often depicted more realistically in terms of its shape (not its size).
- Gaja-Laxmi, 1st century BCE, terracotta, 14.61 cm tall.
- Gold dinar coin of Chandragupta II, reigned c. 375–c. 415 CE
- Restrained double-lotus throne typical of Chola bronzes, when they have them at all. Shiva Nataraja, 10th century.
- Guanyin, 12th-century Japan
- Apart from the three figures, the pendent foot of this 12th-century Tibetan Mahakala has its own throne
- Krishna, the butter thief, ivory, 16th-century India
- Fancy coloured Buddhist throne under Mahakala, Ladakh
- Single lotus throne under Gaja-Laxmi, with side stalks and buds, Odisha, 18th century
- Raja Ravi Varma, Goddess Lakshmi, 1896
Representing the whole plant
The vast majority of lotus thrones just depict an isolated flower or a group of flowers under different figures. But some images depict more of the plant. A famous relief of Gaja-Laxmi in Cave 16 at Ellora shows a pond of lotus leaves and budding flowers as a vertical panel below the throne.
Other compositions show stalks, buds and flowers reaching up beside a main figure. These may terminate in a flower held by the main figure, especially if it is Avalokitesvara or from the 5th or 6th century Vishnu, (both also having the epithet Padmapani, "lotus holder"), or in another lotus throne behind the hand, if it is outstretched in a mudra. Alternatively, stalks may climb up to support lotus thrones underneath minor, smaller, figures, as in the early terracotta plaque illustrated above, where stalks rise at the side to support the elephants lustrating Gaja-Laxmi. This is seen in the 1st century BCE terracotta plaque illustrated above. The Sanchi stone relief illustrated here shows a similar composition with Queen Maya, mother of the Buddha. Above or below the water, the stems may be supported by small naga figures.
The lotus plant in lotus thrones is often imagined as growing out of the cosmic ocean, and a few images represent the plant below the water level, with a stem also representing the world axis.
Notes
- Pal, 39
- Pal, 39–42; Coomaraswamy, 21; Krishan & Tadikonda, 65; Rodrigues
- Pal, 39–40; Coomaraswamy, 21; the texts are: AN 10.81, "Bāhuna suttaṃ"; AN 4.36, "Doṇa suttaṃ".
- Jansen, 18
- Pal, 45
- Coomaraswamy, 18–19; Pal, 40
- Pal, 40
- Coomaraswamy, 22; Krishan & Tadikonda, 78, note 89
- Moore & Klein, 149; Krishan & Tadikonda, 65
- Pal, 41; Walser, 80–87
- Walser, 80, 86–87 for the date
- Walser, 81–83
- Krishan & Tadikonda, 67
- Lerner & Kossak, Nos. 68, 84, 88, 89, 92, 94, 97, 101 (for vishvapadma), 110, 111, 113 etc.
- Lerner & Kossak, Nos. 133, 139, 140; Hāṇḍā, Omacanda, Gaddi Land in Chamba: Its History, Art & Culture : New Light on the Early Wooden Temples, 78–79, 2005, Indus Publishing, ISBN 8173871744, 9788173871740, google books
- Pal, 40
- Michell, 362
- Lerner & Kossak, Nos. 116, 117, 119
- Pal, 39
- Pal, 41
- Pal, 40
- Coomaraswamy, 53
- Coomaraswamy, 20, 53–55
References
- Coomaraswamy, Ananda, Elements of Buddhist Iconography, Harvard University Press, 1935, online text
- Jansen, Eva Rudy, The Book of Hindu Imagery: The Gods and their Symbols, 1993, Binkey Kok Publications, ISBN 9074597076, 9789074597074, google books
- Krishan, Yuvrajmm, Tadikonda, Kalpana K., The Buddha Image: Its Origin and Development, 1996, Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, ISBN 8121505658, 9788121505659, google books
- Lerner, Martin and Kossak, Steven, The Lotus Transcendent: Indian and Southeast Asian Art from the Samuel Eilenberg Collection, 1991, Metropolitan Museum of Art (New York, N.Y.), ISBN 0870996134, 9780870996139, google books
- Michell, George (1990), The Penguin Guide to the Monuments of India, Volume 1: Buddhist, Jain, Hindu, 1990, Penguin Books, ISBN 0140081445
- Moore, Albert C., Klein, Charlotte, Iconography of Religions: An Introduction, 1977, Chris Robertson, ISBN 0800604881, 9780800604882, google books
- Pal, Pratapaditya, Indian Sculpture: Circa 500 B.C.-A.D. 700, Volume 1 of Indian Sculpture: A Catalogue of the Los Angeles County Museum of Art Collection, 1986, Los Angeles County Museum of Art/University of California Press, ISBN 0520059913, 9780520059917, google books
- Rodrigues, H, "The Sacred Lotus Symbol", Mahavidya, 2016
- Walser, Joseph, Nagarjuna in Context: Mahayana Buddhism and Early Indian Culture, 2005, Columbia University Press, ISBN 0231506236, 9780231506236, google books