Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Journal of Joan of Arc Studies: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:10, 12 December 2006 editRoyalguard11 (talk | contribs)13,192 editsm →[]: Delete← Previous edit Latest revision as of 07:53, 7 February 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''
<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''delete'''. --''']]''' 20:49, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
===]=== ===]===
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|O}}
:{{la|Journal of Joan of Arc Studies}} <includeonly> — (])</includeonly> :{{la|Journal of Joan of Arc Studies}} <includeonly> — (])</includeonly>
This journal's publisher appears to be a vanity press rather than a legitimate academic organization. In addition, according to WorldCat, the journal is not held by any libraries, and as far as I can tell has published only one issue (or perhaps none). The publication doesn't appear to be notable. ] (]) 03:12, 11 December 2006 (UTC) This journal's publisher appears to be a vanity press rather than a legitimate academic organization. In addition, according to WorldCat, the journal is not held by any libraries, and as far as I can tell has published only one issue (or perhaps none). The publication doesn't appear to be notable. ] (]) 03:12, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per nom. ] 03:38, 11 December 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' per nom. ] 03:38, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per nom. 2 of 4 sources are it's own materials; 1 is dead; other is useless to prove notablity. <font face="Vivaldi"><font size="large"><font color="Green">]</font>,<font color="Purple">09:22, 11 December 2006 (UTC)</font></font></font> *'''Delete''' per nom. 2 of 4 sources are it's own materials; 1 is dead; other is useless to prove notablity. <span style="font-family:Vivaldi; font-size:large;">],<span style="color:purple;">09:22, 11 December 2006 (UTC)</span></span>
*'''Delete''' ] 11:34, 11 December 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' ] 11:34, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per above. ] 17:52, 11 December 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' per above. ] 17:52, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''', at least until this Journal gains some reputation in the field as a reliable peer-reviewed journal.-- ] <sup>]</sup> <sub>]</sub> 00:00, 12 December 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''', at least until this Journal gains some reputation in the field as a reliable peer-reviewed journal.-- ] <sup>]</sup> <sub>]</sub> 00:00, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' fails ].--] 00:07, 12 December 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' fails ].--] 00:07, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
* '''Delete''' per arguements above & per nom. -]<small>(]·]·])</small> 01:10, 12 December 2006 (UTC) * '''Delete''' per arguements above & per nom. -]<small>(]·]·])</small> 01:10, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
*'''reluctant delete''' its a small academic society, not a vanity press, but it does not seem to have actually put out much in the way of publication & its websites didnt work. ] 05:54, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
* '''Delete''' ] 09:17, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 07:53, 7 February 2023

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 20:49, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Journal of Joan of Arc Studies

Journal of Joan of Arc Studies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

This journal's publisher appears to be a vanity press rather than a legitimate academic organization. In addition, according to WorldCat, the journal is not held by any libraries, and as far as I can tell has published only one issue (or perhaps none). The publication doesn't appear to be notable. --Akhilleus (talk) 03:12, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.