Revision as of 22:11, 29 February 2020 editNaomiAmethyst (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers, Template editors6,269 edits →Weird archive index: Reply.← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 08:50, 30 December 2024 edit undoCiaPan (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers12,151 edits Reverted good faith edits by 2605:59C8:409B:4E10:A5C5:6CFD:BC29:C2E2 (talk): Test editTags: Twinkle Undo | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{skip to TOC}} | {{skip to TOC}} | ||
{{divbox|1=red|2=This user is NOT a human|3=This is the combined talk page for ] and ]. These users are ''']''' and are '''not humans'''. Please be aware that bots cannot think like a human and cannot operate outside of their programming. '''Messages you leave on this talk page will not be answered by a bot''' – either a bot operator or another human will answer you.}} | {{divbox|1=red|2=This user is NOT a human|3=This is the combined talk page for ] and ]. These users are ''']''' and are '''not humans'''. Please be aware that bots cannot think like a human and cannot operate outside of their programming. '''Messages you leave on this talk page will not be answered by a bot''' – either a bot operator or another human will answer you.}} | ||
{{divbox|1=red|2=] False positives and false negatives|3=If you believe that ClueBot NG has mistakenly identified a good edit as vandalism, please follow the directions in the warning it gave or ]. Please do not report it on this talk page. It takes less time to report the case to the correct location, and we can handle it more effectively there.<br />If you believe that ClueBot NG has missed an edit that ''is'' vandalism, again do not report it here. ClueBot is unable to catch ''all'' vandalism. Just revert the edit and warn the editor.}} | {{divbox|1=red|2=] False positives and false negatives|3=If you believe that ClueBot NG has mistakenly identified a good edit as vandalism, please follow the directions in the warning it gave or ]. Please do not report it on this talk page. It takes less time to report the case to the correct location, and we can handle it more effectively there.<br />If you believe that ClueBot NG has missed an edit that ''is'' vandalism, again do not report it here. ClueBot is unable to catch ''all'' vandalism. Just revert the edit and warn the editor.}} | ||
{{divbox|1=blue|2=ClueBot NG Links!|3=]{{•}} ]}} | {{divbox|1=blue|2=ClueBot NG Links!|3=]{{•}} ]}} | ||
{{divbox|1=blue|2=Purpose of this Page|3=This page is for '''comments on''' or '''questions about''' the ClueBots.}} | {{divbox|1=blue|2=Purpose of this Page|3=This page is for '''comments on''' or '''questions about''' the ClueBots.}} | ||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
|} | |} | ||
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis | {{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis | ||
|archiveprefix=User talk:ClueBot Commons/ |
|archiveprefix=User talk:ClueBot Commons/Archives/Facepalms | ||
|format= | |format= | ||
|age=99999 | |age=99999 | ||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
|archivenow=<nowiki>{{facepalm,{{Facepalm</nowiki> | |archivenow=<nowiki>{{facepalm,{{Facepalm</nowiki> | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ |
{{Archives|collapsed=yes|image=none|search=no|style=background-color:transparent; border-color:#CCCCCC| | ||
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis | {{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis | ||
|archiveprefix=User talk:ClueBot Commons/Archives/ | |archiveprefix=User talk:ClueBot Commons/Archives/ | ||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
|archivebox=yes | |archivebox=yes | ||
|box-advert=yes | |box-advert=yes | ||
|minkeepthreads=2 | |||
|archivenow=<nowiki>{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}},{{/censor}},{{atop}}</nowiki> | |archivenow=<nowiki>{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}},{{/censor}},{{atop}}</nowiki> | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 41: | Line 42: | ||
<div style="clear: both;" ></div> | <div style="clear: both;" ></div> | ||
== Question regarding ClueBot == | |||
== ClueBot NG is a pending changes reviewer - why? == | |||
Can I please see the source? (A github url for ClueBot) ? | |||
ClueBot NG is flagged as a pending changes reviewer. But, it have never accepted pending changes (https://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Log?type=review&user=ClueBot+NG&page=&wpdate=&tagfilter=&subtype=accept) or unaccepted accepted revisions (https://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Log?type=review&user=ClueBot+NG&page=&wpdate=&tagfilter=&subtype=unaccept), so it has never used the rights. Furthermore, looking at the BRFAs I found I don't see any approval to act as a reviewer. The rights were added by {{ping|Cobi|p=}} in 2010 with the summary "+ClueBot's flags." - are these still needed? Thanks, --] (]) 21:57, 22 February 2020 (UTC) | |||
Is it being run on someone's PC or is it being run in the cloud? | |||
:If a editor who is not +PC undoes an edit by another editor, wouldn't that "undo" edit appear a pending? ] (]) 03:36, 23 February 2020 (UTC) | |||
I have more questions than I have answers coming to this page. | |||
::{{ping|DMacks}} no - all autoconfirmed users have autoreview. +PC just allows accepting (or unaccepting) edits by users without autoreview (ip / non-confirmed) ] (]) 03:48, 23 February 2020 (UTC) | |||
:::I just applied the same flags that ] had at the time, as ClueBot was being decommissioned and ClueBot NG was replacing it. See for when that right was added to ClueBot. -- ]<sup>(]|]|])</sup> 23:58, 23 February 2020 (UTC) | |||
Thanks ] (]) 12:20, 8 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Weird archive index == | |||
:@] the bot runs on Wikimedia Toolforge and its source code is . <span style="white-space:nowrap"><span style="font-family:monospace">'''<nowiki>''']<nowiki>]]'''</nowiki>'''</span> (] • ])</span> 13:47, 8 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
I just saw ]. ClueBot III is doing it, but I don't think this is intended behaviour. Instead of an index of archives it's a list of articles. ] (]) 22:43, 28 February 2020 (UTC) | |||
:It's been doing that for years in numerous locations, with no explanation having been provided as to why it does this. —] <span title="Canadian!" style="color:red">🍁</span> (] · ]) 20:50, 29 February 2020 (UTC) | |||
::It's usually due to an incorrect <tt>archiveprefix</tt> setting. In this case, it's the space between the equals and <tt>User talk:Pluma</tt>. -- ]<sup>(]|]|])</sup> 22:11, 29 February 2020 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 08:50, 30 December 2024
Skip to table of contents |
If you believe that ClueBot NG has missed an edit that is vandalism, again do not report it here. ClueBot is unable to catch all vandalism. Just revert the edit and warn the editor. ClueBot NG Links!Report False Positives • Frequently Asked Questions Purpose of this PageThis page is for comments on or questions about the ClueBots.
The current status of ClueBot NG is: Running
The current status of ClueBot III is: Running
Praise should go on the praise page. Barnstars and other awards should go on the awards page.
Use the "new section" button at the top of this page to add a new section. Use the link above each section to edit that section.
This page is automatically archived by ClueBot III.
The ClueBots' owner or someone else who knows the answer to your question will reply on this page.
ClueBots | |
---|---|
ClueBot NG/Anti-vandalism · ClueBot II/ClueBot Script | |
ClueBot III/Archive · Talk page for all ClueBots |
Beware! This user's talk page is monitored by talk page watchers. Some of them even talk back. |
Question regarding ClueBot
Can I please see the source? (A github url for ClueBot) ? Is it being run on someone's PC or is it being run in the cloud? I have more questions than I have answers coming to this page.
Thanks Vidyagamerfromaus (talk) 12:20, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Vidyagamerfromaus the bot runs on Wikimedia Toolforge and its source code is here. ''']''' (talk • contribs) 13:47, 8 December 2024 (UTC)