Misplaced Pages

Talk:Chelsea Manning: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:58, 12 March 2020 editJasonconaway (talk | contribs)5 editsNo edit summaryTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit← Previous edit Latest revision as of 19:30, 3 January 2025 edit undoSpookyaki (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,295 edits Assessment: banner shell, Biography, Freedom of speech (Low), Human rights (High), Gender studies (Low), Law (Low), Military history (Rater
(271 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{OnThisDay|date1=2019-02-18|oldid1=883922681}}
{{Top 25 Report|August 18, 2013}}
{{Pp-move-vandalism|small=yes}}
{{Skip to talk}} {{Skip to talk}}
{{Talk header|arpol=yes|search=no|bottom=yes|noarchives=yes}} {{Talk header|search=no|bottom=yes|noarchives=yes}}
{{Round in circles|topic=article name and gender}} {{FAQ|collapsed=no}}
{{Round in circles|topic=article name and gender|search=no}}
{{Notice|Editor behavior around the article title discussion was brought to Misplaced Pages's ]:<br />
*]
}}
{{MOS-TW}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=GA|collapsed=yes|blp=activepol|vital=yes|listas=Manning, Chelsea|1=
{{WikiProject Biography|military-work-group=yes|military-priority=Mid|politician-work-group=yes|politician-priority=Low}}
{{WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Freedom of speech|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Human rights|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Gender studies |importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Journalism|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Law|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies|person=yes}}
{{WikiProject Media|importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Military history|class=GA|Biography=yes|US=yes|Post-Cold-War=yes}}
{{WikiProject Oklahoma|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Women}}
{{Wiki Loves Pride talk|2017}}
}}
{{Banner holder|collapsed=yes|1=
{{Misplaced Pages:Featured article tools|1=Chelsea Manning}}
{{Connected contributor|User1=Adrian~enwiki|U1-declared=yes|U1-EH=yes|User2=Brian Manning|U2-declared=yes|U2-EH=yes}}
{{Article history {{Article history
|action1=GAN |action1=GAN
Line 18: Line 38:
|currentstatus=GA |currentstatus=GA
|topic=socsci |topic=socsci
|otd1date=2019-02-18|otd1oldid=883922681
}} }}
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|blp=yes|1= {{Press|collapsed=yes
{{WikiProject Biography |class=GA |listas=Manning, Chelsea |military-priority=Low |military-work-group=yes |activepol=yes |living=yes}}
{{WikiProject Military history |biography=yes |class=GA |Middle-Eastern=yes |US=yes |importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Journalism |class=GA |importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject LGBT studies |class=GA |person=yes}}
{{WikiProject Oklahoma |class=GA |importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Women |class=GA |importance=}}
}}
{{MOS-TW}}
{{FAQ|collapsed=no}}
{{Notice|Editor behavior around the article title discussion was brought to Misplaced Pages's ]:<br/>
*]
}}
{{Connected contributor|User1=Adrian|U1-declared=yes|U1-EH=yes|User2=Brian Manning|U2-declared=yes|U2-EH=yes}}
{| class="tmbox tmbox-notice collapsible collapsed"
|-
| class="mbox-image" | ]
! class="mbox-text" style="text-align: left; padding-bottom: 0; margin-bottom: 0" | This article has been ]:
|-
| colspan = 2 |
{{div col|colwidth=30em}}
* {{cite news
|title=Misplaced Pages Beats Major News Organizations, Perfectly Reflects Chelsea Manning's New Gender |title=Misplaced Pages Beats Major News Organizations, Perfectly Reflects Chelsea Manning's New Gender
|first=Mark Joseph |author=Mark Joseph Stern
|last=Stern
|date=August 22, 2013 |date=August 22, 2013
|url=http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2013/08/22/chelsea_manning_wikipedia_perfectly_reflects_new_gender_of_whistleblower.html |url=http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2013/08/22/chelsea_manning_wikipedia_perfectly_reflects_new_gender_of_whistleblower.html
|newspaper=] |org=]
|accessdate=August 22, 2013}} |accessdate=August 22, 2013

* {{cite news
|title=Bradley Manning wants to live as a woman named Chelsea Manning |title2=Bradley Manning wants to live as a woman named Chelsea Manning
|url=http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-bradley-manning-woman-chelsea-manning-20130822,0,7620376.story#ixzz2lg3aFF6G |url2=http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-bradley-manning-woman-chelsea-manning-20130822,0,7620376.story#ixzz2lg3aFF6G
|date=August 22, 2013 |date2=August 22, 2013
|last=Abcarian |author2=Robin Abcarian
|accessdate2=August 23, 2013
|first=Robin
|org2=]
|accessdate=August 23, 2013

|newspaper=]}}
|title3=Misplaced Pages Changed Its Entry To Properly Reflect Chelsea Manning's Name
* {{cite news
|author3=Justine Sharrock
|title=Misplaced Pages Changed Its Entry To Properly Reflect Chelsea Manning's Name
|date3=August 22, 2013
|last=Sharrock
|url3=http://www.buzzfeed.com/justinesharrock/wikipedia-changed-its-entry-to-properly-reflect-chelsea-mann
|first=Justine
|org3=]
|date=August 22, 2013
|accessdate3=August 23, 2013
|url=http://www.buzzfeed.com/justinesharrock/wikipedia-changed-its-entry-to-properly-reflect-chelsea-mann

|newspaper=]
|url4=http://www.usnews.com/news/newsgram/articles/2013/08/22/bradley-manning-real-me-is-a-woman-named-chelsea
|accessdate=August 23, 2013}}
|title4=Bradley Manning: 'Real Me' Is a Woman Named Chelsea
* {{cite news
|author4=Steven Nelson
|url=http://www.usnews.com/news/newsgram/articles/2013/08/22/bradley-manning-real-me-is-a-woman-named-chelsea
|date4=August 22, 2013
|title=Bradley Manning: 'Real Me' Is a Woman Named Chelsea
|org4=]
|last=Nelson
|accessdate4=August 27, 2013
|first=Steven

|date=August 22, 2013
|url5=http://www.newrepublic.com/article/114418/bradley-manning-chelsea-now-wants-hormone-therapy
|newspaper=]
|title5=He Is Not Bradley Manning. She Is Chelsea Manning. Deal With It.
|accessdate=August 27, 2013}}
|author5=Ryan Kearney
* {{cite news
|date5=August 22, 2013
|url=http://www.newrepublic.com/article/114418/bradley-manning-chelsea-now-wants-hormone-therapy
|accessdate5=August 27, 2013
|title=He Is Not Bradley Manning. She Is Chelsea Manning. Deal With It.
|org5=]
|last=Kearney

|first=Ryan
|url6=http://blogs.marketwatch.com/thetell/2013/08/22/wikipedia-joins-supporters-in-quick-embrace-of-mannings-transition-from-bradley-to-chelsea/
|date=August 22, 2013
|title6=Bradley Manning: 'I am a female'
|accessdate=August 27, 2013
|org6=]
|newspaper=]}}
|date6=August 22, 2013
* {{cite news
|accessdate6=August 29, 2013
|url=http://blogs.marketwatch.com/thetell/2013/08/22/wikipedia-joins-supporters-in-quick-embrace-of-mannings-transition-from-bradley-to-chelsea/
|author6=Barbara Kollmeyer
|title=Bradley Manning: 'I am a female'

|newspaper=]
|title7=Behind the Misplaced Pages wars: what happened when Bradley Manning became Chelsea
|date=August 22, 2013
|author7=Alex Hern
|accessdate=August 29, 2013
|org7=]
|last=Kollmeyer
|date7=August 23, 2013
|first=Barbara}}
|accessdate7=August 23, 2013
* {{cite news
|url7=http://www.newstatesman.com/sci-tech/2013/08/behind-wikipedia-wars-what-happened-when-bradley-manning-became-chelsea
|title=Behind the Misplaced Pages wars: what happened when Bradley Manning became Chelsea

|last=Hern
|url8=http://www.dailydot.com/lifestyle/wikipedia-battle-chelsea-bradley-manning-gender/
|first=Alex
|title8=Misplaced Pages battle rages over Chelsea Manning's gender identity
|newspaper=]
|author8=Tim Sampson
|date=August 23, 2013
|accessdate=August 23, 2013 |date8=August 23, 2013
|accessdate8=August 28, 2013
|url=http://www.newstatesman.com/sci-tech/2013/08/behind-wikipedia-wars-what-happened-when-bradley-manning-became-chelsea}}
|org8=]
* {{cite news

|url=http://www.dailydot.com/lifestyle/wikipedia-battle-chelsea-bradley-manning-gender/
|title=Misplaced Pages battle rages over Chelsea Manning's gender identity |title9=What's in a name? Chelsea Manning and Muhammad Ali
|url9=http://www.salon.com/2013/08/24/what%E2%80%99s_in_a_name_chelsea_manning_and_muhammad_ali/
|last=Sampson
|accessdate9=November 25, 2013
|first=Tim
|org9=]
|date=August 23, 2013
|author9=Andrew O'Hehir
|accessdate=August 28, 2013
|date9=August 24, 2013
|newspaper=]}}

* {{cite news
|url10=http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Society/2013/0825/Bradley-or-Chelsea-What-to-call-Pvt.-Manning-video
|title=What's in a name? Chelsea Manning and Muhammad Ali
|title10='Bradley' or 'Chelsea' – What to call Pvt. Manning?
|url=http://www.salon.com/2013/08/24/what%E2%80%99s_in_a_name_chelsea_manning_and_muhammad_ali/
|org10=]
|accessdate=November 25, 2013
|author10=Brad Knickerbocker
|newspaper=]
|date10=August 25, 2013
|last=O'Hehir
|acccessdate10=August 28, 2013
|first=Andrew

|date=August 24, 2013
|url11=http://swampland.time.com/2013/08/28/media-makes-the-manning-switch/
|title11=Media Makes the Manning Switch
|author11=Katy Steinmetz
|date11=August 28, 2013
|accessdate11=August 31, 2013
|org11=]

|url12=http://www.dailydot.com/news/wikipedia-chelsea-bradley-manning-transgender-debate/
|title12=Misplaced Pages decides Chelesa Manning will remain 'Bradley' for now
|author12=Jay Hathaway
|date12=August 31, 2013
|accessdate12=August 31, 2013
|org12=]

|url13=http://www.newstatesman.com/alex-hern/2013/09/chelsea-manning-gets-put-back-closet-wikipedia
|title13=Chelsea Manning gets put back in the closet by Misplaced Pages
|author13=Alex Hern
|date13=September 4, 2013
|accessdate13=September 4, 2013
|org13=]

|url14=http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/oct/24/chelsea-manning-name-row-wikipedia-editors-banned-from-trans-pages
|title14=Chelsea Manning name row: Misplaced Pages editors banned from trans pages
|author14=Alex Hern
|date14=October 24, 2013
|accessdate14=October 24, 2013
|org14=]

|url15=http://www.dailydot.com/news/wikipedia-chelsea-manning-trans-edits/
|title15=After Chelsea Manning row, Misplaced Pages bans transphobic editors
|author15=Kevin Collier
|accessdate15=October 29, 2013
|date15=October 26, 2013
|org15=]
}} }}
{{Top 25 Report|Aug 18 2013|Jan 15 2017|May 14 2017|Apr 7 2019}}
* {{cite news
|url=http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Society/2013/0825/Bradley-or-Chelsea-What-to-call-Pvt.-Manning-video
|title='Bradley' or 'Chelsea' – What to call Pvt. Manning?
|newspaper=]
|last=Knickerbocker
|first=Brad
|date=August 25, 2013
|accessdate=August 28, 2013}}
* {{cite news
|url=http://swampland.time.com/2013/08/28/media-makes-the-manning-switch/
|title=Media Makes the Manning Switch
|last=Steinmetz
|first=Katy
|date=August 28, 2013
|accessdate=August 31, 2013
|newspaper=]}}
* {{cite news
|url=http://www.dailydot.com/news/wikipedia-chelsea-bradley-manning-transgender-debate/
|title=Misplaced Pages decides Chelesa Manning will remain 'Bradley' for now
|last=Hathaway
|first=Jay
|date=August 31, 2013
|accessdate=August 31, 2013
|newspaper=]}}
* {{cite news
|url=http://www.newstatesman.com/alex-hern/2013/09/chelsea-manning-gets-put-back-closet-wikipedia
|title=Chelsea Manning gets put back in the closet by Misplaced Pages
|last=Hern
|first=Alex
|date=September 4, 2013
|accessdate=September 4, 2013
|newspaper=]}}
* {{cite news
|url=http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/oct/24/chelsea-manning-name-row-wikipedia-editors-banned-from-trans-pages
|title=Chelsea Manning name row: Misplaced Pages editors banned from trans pages
|last=Hern
|first=Alex
|date=October 24, 2013
|accessdate=October 24, 2013
|newspaper=]}}
* {{cite news
|url=http://www.dailydot.com/news/wikipedia-chelsea-manning-trans-edits/
|title=After Chelsea Manning row, Misplaced Pages bans transphobic editors
|last=Collier
|first=Kevin
|accessdate=October 29, 2013
|date=October 26, 2013
|newspaper=]}}
{{div col end}}
|}
{{Old moves {{Old moves
|title1=Bradley Manning|title2=Chelsea Manning|title3=Breanna Manning|title4=Arrest of Bradley Manning |title1=Bradley Manning|title2=Chelsea Manning|title3=Breanna Manning|title4=Arrest of Bradley Manning
Line 174: Line 158:
*RM, Chelsea Manning → Manning (U.S. Army), '''Not moved''', 14 March 2014, ] *RM, Chelsea Manning → Manning (U.S. Army), '''Not moved''', 14 March 2014, ]
}} }}
{{merged-from | Chelsea Manning gender identity media coverage| 18 September 2013}} {{Merged-from | Chelsea Manning gender identity media coverage| 18 September 2013}}
{{Annual readership}}
{{Wiki Loves Pride 2017}}
}}
{{Archives|bot=lowercase sigmabot III|age=180|units=days|index=/Archive index}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config {{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{aan}} |archiveheader = {{aan}}
|maxarchivesize = 200K |maxarchivesize = 200K
|counter = 16 |counter = 17
|minthreadsleft = 5 |minthreadsleft = 5
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 |minthreadstoarchive = 1
Line 186: Line 172:
}} }}
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn|target=Talk:Chelsea Manning/Archive index|mask=Talk:Chelsea Manning/Archive <#>|leading_zeros=0|indexhere=yes}} {{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn|target=Talk:Chelsea Manning/Archive index|mask=Talk:Chelsea Manning/Archive <#>|leading_zeros=0|indexhere=yes}}
{{Vital article|level=5|topic=People|subpage=Activists|class=GA}}
{{Misplaced Pages:Featured article tools|1=Chelsea Manning}}
{{archives|search=no|bot=Lowercase sigmabot III|age=180|units=days|index=/Archive index|}}


== Political prisoner ==
== Sex reassignment surgery is relevant to article ==

https://www.amnesty.org.uk/press-releases/chelsea-mannings-original-revelations-still-need-investigating

Amnesty has campaigned for Manning’s release since 2013, when she was sentenced to 35 years’ imprisonment - a jail term much longer than for military personnel convicted of murder, rape and war crimes - for leaking classified government material. Amnesty believes the sentence was excessive and should have been commuted to time served (over three years at the time of sentencing), not least because Manning was overcharged using antiquated legislation aimed at dealing with treason, and denied the opportunity to use a public interest defence at her trial.

In addition, the whistleblower was held for 11 months in pre-trial detention conditions that the UN Special Rapporteur on Torture Juan Mendez deemed to be cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment. She was placed in solitary confinement as punishment for a suicide attempt last year, and was denied appropriate treatment related to her gender identity during her incarceration. In a podcast for Amnesty in 2016 (), Manning recounted the draconian nature of her pre-trial detention at Marine Corps Base Quantico in Virginia: ] (]) 22:21, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
:@], I'm unsure about your intentions. Do you think something needs to be added to the article? <b style="font-family:Monospace">-- ] (])</b> 22:26, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
::I think it should be added to the article that Amnesty International considered Manning a political prisoner and demanded his release and regularly published articles about her. However, Amnesty International argued that not every political prisoner is given the special status of "prisoner of conscience", which is designed to draw maximum attention to a particular political prisoner. ] (]) 00:41, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
:::The term "political prisoner" is not used in either of the sources listed above, that I can find. -- ] (]) 02:05, 26 November 2023 (UTC)


== Semi-protected edit request on 13 December 2023 ==
On October 20, 2018, ] of Chelsea Manning's announcement that she had, after years of fighting for it, finally undergone surgery. In <span style="color:red"><s>his</s></span> edit summary, Rab V made two points. First, it was "not directly stated in tweet what the surgery is." Any fair reading of ] would confirm that Manning has fought for only one type of surgery: ] (SRS). Second, Rab V contends that "without secondary source it is difficult to establish how relevant a surgery would be to rest of article." Again, one need merely read this BLP, which mentions SRS four times, to establish that editorial consensus has long recognized the relevance of said surgery to Chelsea Manning. I request renewed discussion to affirm that this latest development is, obviously, about SRS and that it is, just as obviously, relevant to the BLP. ] (]) 20:52, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
:Still if it's not immediately obvious the exact nature of the surgery we shouldn't be making assumptions or we could run into OR issues. The surgery may be related to being trans and not be sexual reassignment surgery, for example orchiectomy or breast augmentation. My tendency is to be cautious around BLP issues for people's medical history as well. If it is very notable, it will probably show up in secondary sources that could also clarify the exact surgery since Manning is still often in the news. Might as well wait til then. PS I am not a man and we probably shouldn't gender wikipedia editors as if they are :) ] (]) 21:01, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
::The quote can be run after being led into by a reference to that she was to receive "gender transition surgery". Under ], we can and should skip the wikilink in the quote itself. --] (]) 21:19, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
:::{{ping|NatGertler}} The Reuters story to which you link is more than two years old (Sep 14, 2016). As such, it is unrelated to this latest development and ought not to be added. ] (]) 21:24, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
::::Whoops, sorry, the Google News results were listing that as an October 8, 2018 story for some reason. --] (]) 22:32, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
:::{{ping|NatGertler}} I also reject your reading of ], which states: "…when linking within quotations, link only to targets that correspond to the meaning clearly intended by the quote's author." I submit that Manning's intended meaning is clear: she's alluding to ]. ] (]) 21:29, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
::::I'm not certain which surgery she is referring to exactlty so we are still at an impasse. It seems related to her status as trans but that still could imply several different possible surgeries. My understanding with regards to notability of surgery within the article, the issue that made it notable and widely discussed in the news was the legal fight the DoD had with her. That fight ended when she left their custody so isn't an issue now. My preference would still be for a reliable secondary source to clear up what surgery she had and help us make sure we aren't wading into BLP issues around someone's medical history. ] (]) 00:20, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
:::::{{ping|Rab v}} . She received SRS. --] (]) 16:50, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
::::::{{done}}. New subsection has been added with citations to reliable sources to support this important development in Manning's gender transition, which did not end with her May 2017 release from military prison and that she herself chose to publicize in 2018. ] (]) 19:49, 18 December 2019 (UTC)


{{Edit semi-protected|Chelsea Manning|answered=yes}}
You cut whatever you want off, you are still a man. ] (]) 18:58, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Remove the phrase “and perhaps to study for a PhD in physics” as it is purely speculative. Manning had no higher education at the time of enlisting, and her GI Bill would have run out of money before reaching the doctorate level, so claiming she would have been acquiring a PhD with her GI Bill is inaccurate. Saying she enlisted in order to be eligible for GI Bill benefits is far more accurate. ] (]) 03:22, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
:]&nbsp;'''Not done for now:'''<!-- Template:ESp --> The statement appears well-sourced – see ref 72 – is there some reason to assume the author of the reference was misinformed? ] (]) 07:58, 13 December 2023 (UTC)


== Who is Casey Manning? ==
== Section headings for footnotes & bibliography ==


Who is Casey Manning?
I propose the following.
* The existing "'''Citations'''" heading be renamed "'''Footnotes'''". (In most articles it would be called "References", but I think that is also not quite right here). In some cases the entries are brief citations (''e.g.'' "Nicks 2012, pp. 237, 246"), in other cases they comprise full references (", p. 2."), and in yet other cases they are instead notes (''e.g.'' "Note: WikiLeaks tweeted on January 8, 2010, that <nowiki></nowiki>"). But in ''all'' cases they are indeed footnotes.
* The existing "'''References'''" heading be renamed "'''Bibliography'''". While the entries in this section are indeed references, they do ''not'' comprise all of the references used for the article, contrary to what may be expected from the existing heading. A bibliography is generally understood as a more concise listing of the most pertinent source materials and/or recommended resources for further reading. Given the existing heading "'''Further reading'''" in a following section, readers should readily understand that the former meaning of bibliography is intended, not the latter meaning.
The ] is not prescriptive on this matter.
—DIV (] (]) 06:38, 11 May 2019 (UTC))


There are two mentions of this individual but no links or explanation about who this person is or how he/she/it are related to Chelsea/Bradley Manning.
:IMO the two "Note:"s should be made to use &lt;ref name="foobar" group="note"&gt;, and put into a "Footnotes" or "Notes" section. Then the "Citations" section could be left as-is or renamed "References" if the section currently called "References" were renamed to "Bibliography" as you propose (or to "Further reading" as I have seen in some articles). ] (]) 23:23, 12 May 2019 (UTC)


The main article only says: "Manning has an older sister".
::Boldly . ] (]) 23:31, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
So I assume Casey is Chelsea's older sister, but this should be stated explicitly, otherwise further refernces to this appelation has no grounding in fact.


] (]) 14:45, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
== Section 5.9 needs to be re-worded ==


:Fixed. I added the name to the statement she has an older sister.However, we may need to address how she is refered to later in the text, as at least one source gives her name as Casey Manning Majors, in which case she should be refered to once by that name and later by Majors during the testimony portion. -- ] (]) 14:51, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
The line "as Daniel Domscheit-Berg had previously done" seems to suggest that CM stated this line she die not and is totally separate and hardly relevant as DDB is not a USA citizen, is not in the US and was not subpoenaed, an international request and immunity for prosecution agreement does not constitute anything close to the same thing. Needs to be deleted immediately] (])
:Thank you for the reply and the edit.
:As to the naming, I am of the opinion that one should use the name of a person AT THE TIME of the event being discussed.
:IF the event is at birth, then the birth name should be used.
:In the case of the trial of "Bradley Manning" and prior events, it is wrong to distort history by speaking of "Chelsea Manning". If this becomes a requirement of "political correctness" then we are on a very slippery slope. ] (]) 11:50, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
::This was already a requirement; see ] and supplementary essay {{slink|Misplaced Pages:Gender_identity#Retroactivity}}. It is not common in written English to treat the names of people, places, or things as temporally fixed in the way you suggest (in fact it would be extremely confusing). Correctly naming living biography subjects is an act of basic decency and respect.
::If you have further comments or concerns on how Misplaced Pages writes about transgender people, please take them to a more general forum. Such a change would affect many more pages than this (and has been discussed to death hundreds of times and is never going to happen). –] (] •&nbsp;]) 14:53, 9 April 2024 (UTC)


== why is her deadname literally in the first sentence ==
::{{done}}. The preceding request was submitted on 25 May 2019. As of 17 Dec 2019, "as Daniel Domscheit-Berg had previously done" does not appear in the article. This request should therefore be considered completed. ] (]) 20:00, 16 December 2019 (UTC)


do better ] (]) 18:56, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
== Please add to the page ... ==
:According to the policy, since she was also notable under her previous name, it goes in the lead section (See ]. In fact, her situation is even used as an example).--] (]) 19:00, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
''See also''</br>
::cringe and transphobic ] (]) 19:01, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
*]</br>
:::@] How is it transphobic? It is a legit guideline, did you not even bother to read MOS:DEADNAME before you baselessly called someone cringe and transphobic? ] (]) 02:55, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
<!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) date (UTC)</small>
:{{done}} ] (]) 23:02, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
::Thanks.--] (]) 03:01, 25 February 2020 (UTC)


== Deadname == == My removals ==


Although she was indeed known by it, is it not at least mildly rude to mention her deadname? ] (]) 10:47, 3 March 2020 (UTC) I made quite a few removals so I'm opening a discussion. My concern is that the military service section was wandering way off topic. A lot of the content there should be in a different section. ] (]) 10:37, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
:That is a good question. The policy that applies here is ], which says that if someone is widely notable under the previous name, then it should be included in the lead. In fact, Chelsea Manning is used as an example on the policy page itself.--] (]) 11:22, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 19:30, 3 January 2025

Skip to table of contents
Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Chelsea Manning article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
? view · edit Frequently asked questions

To view an answer, click the link to the right of the question.

Q1: Why is this article titled Chelsea Manning? A majority of sources now use the name "Chelsea" when referring to Manning which would make it the common name. There has been consensus among editors since October 2013 that this name should be used.


Historically, the first 2013 formal move discussion closed, and a committee of three uninvolved and experienced admins determined the move to Chelsea Manning should be reverted back to Bradley. Discussions since that close upheld that waiting 30 days was a good idea and the time should be spent making the case for a new move discussion. In a subsequent move discussion, consensus was against a proposal of "Private Manning" as the article title. A new discussion about moving the article back to "Chelsea Manning" started on September 30 and was closed on October 8 with a consensus to move the article to "Chelsea Manning". Q2: Why does the article refer to Manning as she? MOS:IDENTITY says: "Any person whose gender might be questioned should be referred to by the pronouns, possessive adjectives, and gendered nouns (for example 'man/woman', 'waiter/waitress', 'chairman/chairwoman') that reflect that person's latest expressed gender self-identification. This applies in references to any phase of that person's life, unless the subject has indicated a preference otherwise. Direct quotations may need to be handled as exceptions (in some cases adjusting the portion used may reduce apparent contradictions, and ' ' may be used where necessary)." Q3: Why is Manning in transgender categories? The fact that Manning is transgender, and was a transgender inmate, a transgender soldier, etc, is notable and defining and has been discussed in multiple reliable sources (which are cited in the article). See Misplaced Pages:FAQ/Categorization for more information. Q4: I feel that Misplaced Pages is being biased against (or towards) my beliefs here, what should I do? Misplaced Pages policy mandates that articles reflect the content of reliable sources and be written from a neutral point of view, avoiding advocating for any particular perspective. Minority ideas and opinions must not be given undue weight or promotion in Misplaced Pages articles. It is impossible for coverage of real-world controversies to leave everyone happy – ideas change and adapt over time, and partisan viewpoints are typically entrenched and unable to self-assess bias – but seeking and maintaining neutrality is an ongoing process. Concerns over bias can be addressed with bold editing following the WP:BRD cycle or by starting a civil and constructive discussion at this talk page to suggest article improvements. Q5: Why does Misplaced Pages include Chelsea Manning's deadname? Misplaced Pages's guidelines say that we should include the birth name for a living transgender person in the lead sentence only if the person was notable under that name. This is the case for Chelsea Manning. By doing this, we ensure people who have only heard of Manning as her deadname can still find and recognize the article.
Discussions on this page often lead to previous arguments being restated, especially about article name and gender. Please read recent comments, look in the archives, and review the FAQ before commenting on that topic.
Editor behavior around the article title discussion was brought to Misplaced Pages's Arbitration Committee:
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

This article should adhere to the gender identity guideline because it contains material about one or more trans women. Precedence should be given to self-designation as reported in the most up-to-date reliable sources, anywhere in article space, even when it doesn't match what's most common in reliable sources. Any person whose gender might be questioned should be referred to by the pronouns, possessive adjectives, and gendered nouns (for example "man/woman", "waiter/waitress", "chairman/chairwoman") that reflect that person's latest expressed gender self-identification. Some people go by singular they pronouns, which are acceptable for use in articles. This applies in references to any phase of that person's life, unless the subject has indicated a preference otherwise. Former, pre-transition names may only be included if the person was notable while using the name; outside of the main biographical article, such names should only appear once, in a footnote or parentheses.If material violating this guideline is repeatedly inserted, or if there are other related issues, please report the issue to the LGBTQ+ WikiProject, or, in the case of living people, to the BLP noticeboard.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This  level-5 vital article is rated GA-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.
WikiProject iconBiography: Military / Politics and Government
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Mid-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).
WikiProject iconCrime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconFreedom of speech Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Freedom of speech, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freedom of speech on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Freedom of speechWikipedia:WikiProject Freedom of speechTemplate:WikiProject Freedom of speechFreedom of speech
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconHuman rights High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconGender studies Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconJournalism Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconLaw Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconLGBTQ+ studies: Person
WikiProject iconThis article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Misplaced Pages. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the LGBTQ+ Person task force.
WikiProject iconMedia High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Media To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconMilitary history: Biography / North America / United States / Post-Cold War
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Military biography task force
Taskforce icon
North American military history task force
Taskforce icon
United States military history task force
Taskforce icon
Post-Cold War task force
WikiProject iconOklahoma Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Oklahoma, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oklahoma on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OklahomaWikipedia:WikiProject OklahomaTemplate:WikiProject OklahomaOklahoma
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconWomen
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women
WikiProject iconWiki Loves Pride
WikiProject iconThis article was created or improved during Wiki Loves Pride, 2017.Wiki Loves PrideWikipedia:Wiki Loves PrideTemplate:Wiki Loves Pride talkWiki Loves Pride
          Other talk page banners
Toolbox
The following Misplaced Pages contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
Good articleChelsea Manning has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 11, 2012Good article nomineeListed
August 23, 2013Good article reassessmentKept
On this day...A fact from this article was featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on February 18, 2019.
Current status: Good article
Media mentionThis article has been mentioned by multiple media organizations:
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 4 times. The weeks in which this happened:
This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.

Discussions:

  • RM, Arrest of Bradley Manning → Bradley Manning, Moved, 3 September 2010, discussion
  • RM, Bradley Manning → Alleged leaks of Bradley Manning, No consensus to move, 8 Dec 2010, discussion
  • Move/revert, Bradley Manning → Breanna Manning, Move was reverted, 5 May 2012, discussion
  • RM, Chelsea Manning → Bradley Manning, initial move of the article to "Chelsea Manning" is reverted, returning the article to the original title, "Bradley Manning", 31 August 2013, discussion
  • RM, Bradley Manning → Private Manning, Not moved, 4 September 2013, discussion
  • RM, Bradley Manning → Chelsea Manning, Moved, 1 October 2013, discussion
  • RM, Chelsea Manning → Manning (U.S. Army), Not moved, 14 March 2014, discussion
The contents of the Chelsea Manning gender identity media coverage page were merged into Chelsea Manning on 18 September 2013. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.
Archiving icon
Archives
Index
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3
Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6
Archive 7Archive 8Archive 9
Archive 10Archive 11Archive 12
Archive 13Archive 14Archive 15
Archive 16Archive 17


This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present.


Political prisoner

https://www.amnesty.org.uk/press-releases/chelsea-mannings-original-revelations-still-need-investigating

Amnesty has campaigned for Manning’s release since 2013, when she was sentenced to 35 years’ imprisonment - a jail term much longer than for military personnel convicted of murder, rape and war crimes - for leaking classified government material. Amnesty believes the sentence was excessive and should have been commuted to time served (over three years at the time of sentencing), not least because Manning was overcharged using antiquated legislation aimed at dealing with treason, and denied the opportunity to use a public interest defence at her trial.

In addition, the whistleblower was held for 11 months in pre-trial detention conditions that the UN Special Rapporteur on Torture Juan Mendez deemed to be cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment. She was placed in solitary confinement as punishment for a suicide attempt last year, and was denied appropriate treatment related to her gender identity during her incarceration. In a podcast for Amnesty in 2016 (www.amnesty.org.uk/chelsea), Manning recounted the draconian nature of her pre-trial detention at Marine Corps Base Quantico in Virginia: TimurMamleev (talk) 22:21, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

@TimurMamleev, I'm unsure about your intentions. Do you think something needs to be added to the article? -- Maddy from Celeste (WAVEDASH) 22:26, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
I think it should be added to the article that Amnesty International considered Manning a political prisoner and demanded his release and regularly published articles about her. However, Amnesty International argued that not every political prisoner is given the special status of "prisoner of conscience", which is designed to draw maximum attention to a particular political prisoner. TimurMamleev (talk) 00:41, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
The term "political prisoner" is not used in either of the sources listed above, that I can find. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 02:05, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 13 December 2023

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Remove the phrase “and perhaps to study for a PhD in physics” as it is purely speculative. Manning had no higher education at the time of enlisting, and her GI Bill would have run out of money before reaching the doctorate level, so claiming she would have been acquiring a PhD with her GI Bill is inaccurate. Saying she enlisted in order to be eligible for GI Bill benefits is far more accurate. 2600:6C46:6B00:297:1C39:E471:36B6:43B2 (talk) 03:22, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

 Not done for now: The statement appears well-sourced – see ref 72 – is there some reason to assume the author of the reference was misinformed? Tollens (talk) 07:58, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Who is Casey Manning?

Who is Casey Manning?

There are two mentions of this individual but no links or explanation about who this person is or how he/she/it are related to Chelsea/Bradley Manning.

The main article only says: "Manning has an older sister". So I assume Casey is Chelsea's older sister, but this should be stated explicitly, otherwise further refernces to this appelation has no grounding in fact.

Vonuan (talk) 14:45, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

Fixed. I added the name to the statement she has an older sister.However, we may need to address how she is refered to later in the text, as at least one source gives her name as Casey Manning Majors, in which case she should be refered to once by that name and later by Majors during the testimony portion. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 14:51, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for the reply and the edit.
As to the naming, I am of the opinion that one should use the name of a person AT THE TIME of the event being discussed.
IF the event is at birth, then the birth name should be used.
In the case of the trial of "Bradley Manning" and prior events, it is wrong to distort history by speaking of "Chelsea Manning". If this becomes a requirement of "political correctness" then we are on a very slippery slope. Vonuan (talk) 11:50, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
This was already a requirement; see MOS:DEADNAME and supplementary essay Misplaced Pages:Gender identity § Retroactivity. It is not common in written English to treat the names of people, places, or things as temporally fixed in the way you suggest (in fact it would be extremely confusing). Correctly naming living biography subjects is an act of basic decency and respect.
If you have further comments or concerns on how Misplaced Pages writes about transgender people, please take them to a more general forum. Such a change would affect many more pages than this (and has been discussed to death hundreds of times and is never going to happen). –RoxySaunders 🏳️‍⚧️ (💬 • 📝) 14:53, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

why is her deadname literally in the first sentence

do better Beep320 (talk) 18:56, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

According to the policy, since she was also notable under her previous name, it goes in the lead section (See MOS:DEADNAME. In fact, her situation is even used as an example).--MattMauler (talk) 19:00, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
cringe and transphobic Beep320 (talk) 19:01, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
@Beep320 How is it transphobic? It is a legit guideline, did you not even bother to read MOS:DEADNAME before you baselessly called someone cringe and transphobic? Titan(moon)003 (talk) 02:55, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

My removals

I made quite a few removals so I'm opening a discussion. My concern is that the military service section was wandering way off topic. A lot of the content there should be in a different section. Jozsefs (talk) 10:37, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

Categories: