| Revision as of 02:01, 22 March 2020 editLegobot (talk | contribs)Bots1,668,303 edits Removed: Misplaced Pages:Village pump (policy).← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 19:01, 30 December 2024 edit undoLegobot (talk | contribs)Bots1,668,303 edits Removed: Talk:Zionism. |
| Line 2: |
Line 2: |
|
{{rfclistintro}} |
|
{{rfclistintro}} |
|
</noinclude> |
|
</noinclude> |
|
''']''' |
|
''']''' |
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
How should ] describe the current for-profit/non-profit status of Grand Canyon University? |
|
Should be included in the article? --]<sup>]</sup> 19:26, 21 March 2020 (UTC)}} |
|
|
|
*'''Option 1''': Do not describe GCU as presently "for-profit" or "non-profit" in Misplaced Pages's voice (such as in ]); or |
|
''']''' |
|
|
|
*'''Option 2''': Describe GCU in ] as presently a "for-profit" institution (such as in ]); |
|
|
*'''Option 3''': Describe GCU in Misplaced Pages's voice as presently a "non-profit" institution. |
|
|
— ] <sub>]</sub> 19:14, 29 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
The opening to the ] article read: |
|
This is an ongoing issue, thus I am re-proposing this RfC. We need to settle the countries/territories/dependencies issue settled once for all.<br>Are '''territories and dependencies''' {{small|(full list from ]: Hong Kong, Puerto Rico, Macau, New Caledonia, French Polynesia, Guam, Curaçao, Aruba, Jersey, U.S. Virgin Islands, Isle of Man, Cayman Islands, Bermuda, Guernsey, American Samoa, Greenland, Northern Mariana Islands, Faroe Islands, Turks and Caicos Islands, Sint Maarten, Saint Martin, Gibraltar, British Virgin Islands, Åland Islands, Cook Islands, Anguilla, Wallis and Futuna, Saint Barthélemy, Saint Pierre and Miquelon, Saint Helena, Ascension |
|
|
and Tristan da Cunha, Montserrat, Falkland Islands, Christmas Island, Norfolk Island, Niue, Tokelau, Cocos (Keeling) Islands, Pitcairn Islands)}} as well as '''scarcely or not universally recognised countries''' {{small|(Taiwan, Kosovo, Western Sahara, Transnistria, Northern Cyprus, Abkhazia, Artsakh, South Ossetia)}} '''to be included in their respective countries' counts''' or not?<br>As of now, two dependent territories (namely Hong Kong and Macau, so that China is referred to as "China {{small|(mainland)}}"), along with scarcely or not universally recognised countries are listes separately from their respective countries, others are not. The count is made more complicate by the fact that most sources (notably including and ) list all dependencies separately.<br>Please, have your say! --] (]) 09:58, 21 March 2020 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
Which of the following texts should be added to the article? ]<sup>]</sup> 04:04, 19 March 2020 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
I have understood that - de facto - the figures presented for Netherlands are an aggregate for the '''Kingdom''' of the Netherlands, consisting of the a) '''country''' of the Netherlands, b) Aruba, c) Curaçao, and d) Sint Maarten. Since, however, the sole name ''Netherlands'' is ambiguous, I plead for at least adding - and keeping added - as a note that ''Netherlands'' as mentioned in the table is to be understood the whole kingdom consisting of the four countries each with their own responsible authority. I think this is essential for a good understanding of the nature of the figures. This is a matter of both geography (one country lies in Europe, one in the southeastern Caribbean, two in the northeastern Caribbean) and politics (since it concerns the political division of one kingdom into four countries). Notes to this end have been added and removed several times. Why and by whom they have been removed, I cannot seem to retrace in the edit history, either because the rate of edits is rather high or because no comment was added from which I succeeded to understand that it concerned a change with respect to Netherlands. Those who like to have such a note removed, please provide arguments.] (]) 14:24, 18 March 2020 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
Is the claim that there are genetic differences in intelligence along racial lines a fringe viewpoint? ] (]) 23:43, 16 March 2020 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
There are a number statements in the article from former members of the MEK: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
'''Abdel Fattah Saeed Hussein Khalil El-Sisi'''{{Efn|{{langx|ar|عبد الفتاح سعيد حسين خليل السيسي}}}} (born 19 November 1954) is an Egyptian politician, ],<ref name="dictator"> |
|
# {{tq|"According to former MEK member Masoud Banisadr, "ooking at the original official ideology of the group, one notices some sort of ideological opportunism within their 'mix and match' set of beliefs"}} |
|
|
|
Sources that categorize Sisi as a dictator: |
|
# {{tq|"According to Masoud Banisadr, following the Iraqi invasion of Iran in 1980, MEK called Saddam Hussein an "aggressor" and a "dictator"."}} |
|
|
|
{{bulleted list|{{Cite news |title=Egypt’s rushed election shows Abdel-Fattah al-Sisi is nervous |url=https://www.economist.com/middle-east-and-africa/2023/10/03/egypts-rushed-election-shows-abdel-fattah-al-sisi-is-nervous |access-date=2024-12-27 |work=The Economist |issn=0013-0613 |quote="Last month Abdel-Fattah al-Sisi, Egypt’s military dictator..."}}|{{Cite web |last=Dunne |first=Michele |date=2019-04-08 |title=Why Is Trump Helping Egypt’s Dictator Entrench His Power? |url=https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/04/08/donald-trump-abdel-fattah-al-sisi-egypt-226579/ |access-date=2024-12-27 |website=POLITICO Magazine |language=en}} |
|
# {{tq|" According to Ardeshir Parkizkari (a former MEK member), the MEK "called the events of Sept. 11 God's revenge on America."}} |
|
|
|
|{{Cite web |title=President Trump, Condemn This Sham Egyptian Election {{!}} The Washington Institute |url=https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/president-trump-condemn-sham-egyptian-election |access-date=2024-12-27 |website=www.washingtoninstitute.org |language=en |quote="...issued a statement praising the Egyptian dictator's magnificent work for the country"}} |
|
# {{tq|"Maryam Rajavi has been reported by former MEK members as having said: "Take the Kurds under your tanks, and save your bullets for the Iranian Revolutionary Guards."}} |
|
|
|
|{{Cite news |title=A Blank Check for Egypt's Dictator |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-06-26/u-dot-s-dot-gives-egypts-dictator-a-blank-check?embedded-checkout=false |access-date=2024-12-27 |work=Bloomberg.com |language=en}} |
|
# {{tq|"According to former MEK member Hassan Heyrani, "several thousand accounts are managed by about 1,000-1,500 MEK members".}} |
|
|
|
|{{Cite web |last=Toosi |first=Nahal |date=2021-07-12 |title=In D.C. visit, Egypt spy boss claims U.S. agreed — in writing — to jail American activist |url=https://www.politico.com/news/2021/07/12/egypt-spy-boss-jail-american-498983 |access-date=2024-12-27 |website=POLITICO |language=en |quote="...Abdel Fattah El-Sisi, the Egyptian dictator who has imprisoned tens of thousands of dissidents."}}{{Cite web |last=Lawler |first=Dave |date=2019-04-23 |title=Egypt's President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi could rule until 2030 after winning referendum |url=https://www.axios.com/2019/04/23/sisi-referendum-rule-egypt-2030-constitution |access-date=2024-12-27 |website=Axios |language=en |quote="He has now cemented his status as Egypt's dictator without losing his position as a U.S. ally."}} |
|
|
|{{Cite web |last=Greenwald |first=Glenn |date=2015-03-31 |title=Obama Personally Tells the Egyptian Dictator That U.S. Will Again Send Weapons (and Cash) to His Regime |url=https://theintercept.com/2015/03/31/obama-lifts-freeze-weapons-transfer-egyptian-dictator/ |access-date=2024-12-27 |website=The Intercept |language=en-US}} |
|
|
|{{Cite web |last=Williams |first=Jennifer |date=2017-04-03 |title=Egypt’s president is a bloodthirsty dictator. Trump thinks he’s done a “fantastic job.” |url=https://www.vox.com/world/2017/4/3/15160358/trump-egypt-abdel-fattah-el-sisi-white-house |access-date=2024-12-27 |website=Vox |language=en-US}}|{{Cite news |date=2020-12-01 |title=Egypt President Abdul Fattah al-Sisi: Ruler with an iron grip |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-19256730 |access-date=2024-11-22 |work=BBC News |language=en-GB}}|{{Cite news |title=Egypt is again under military rule, but Sisi lacks Nasser's appeal |url=https://www.economist.com/special-report/2021/08/24/egypt-is-again-under-military-rule-but-sisi-lacks-nassers-appeal |access-date=2024-11-25 |url-access=subscription|work=The Economist |issn=0013-0613|archive-url=https://archive.today/2021.08.26-144020/https://www.economist.com/special-report/2021/08/24/egypt-is-again-under-military-rule-but-sisi-lacks-nassers-appeal|archive-date=2021-08-26|url-status=live}}|{{Citation |last=Grewal |first=Sharan |title=Egypt: A Coup against Democracy |date=2023-07-25 |work=Soldiers of Democracy? |pages=136–176 |url=https://academic.oup.com/book/46755/chapter-abstract/414394851?redirectedFrom=fulltext |access-date=2024-11-25 |publisher=Oxford University PressOxford |doi=10.1093/oso/9780192873910.003.0007 |isbn=0-19-287391-1}}|{{Cite web |date=2024-03-15 |title=EU Deal with Egypt Rewards Authoritarianism, Betrays 'EU Values' {{!}} Human Rights Watch |url=https://www.hrw.org/news/2024/03/15/eu-deal-egypt-rewards-authoritarianism-betrays-eu-values |access-date=2024-12-14 |language=en}}}}</ref> and retired military officer who has been serving as the ] and current ] since 2014.<ref name=":5">{{Cite web |date=2024-03-15 |title=EU Deal with Egypt Rewards Authoritarianism, Betrays 'EU Values' {{!}} Human Rights Watch |url=https://www.hrw.org/news/2024/03/15/eu-deal-egypt-rewards-authoritarianism-betrays-eu-values |access-date=2024-12-14 |language=en}}</ref> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(The word dictator been been removed for now while the RfC discussion takes place) |
|
Should these be removed from the article? ] (]) 17:03, 16 March 2020 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
Is the ]'s ] (IFCN) a ] for determining the reliability of ] organizations? — ''''']''' <small>]</small>'' 14:35, 16 March 2020 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
Should allegations of an affair be included in ]'s biography? ] (]) 12:23, 15 March 2020 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
There is a discussion about due weight in the lede, which contains this paragraph WikiLeaks' role in the 2016 US Presidential election: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Should Sisi be referred to as a dictator? Some of these options are not mutually exclusive, so more than one can be selected: |
|
:{{talk quote|During the 2016 US Democratic Party presidential primaries, WikiLeaks hosted emails sent or received by candidate Hillary Clinton while she was Secretary of State. The U.S. Intelligence Community, as well as a Special Counsel investigation, concluded that the Russian government carried out a hacking campaign as part of broader efforts to interfere in the 2016 United States elections. '''In 2018, twelve Russian intelligence officers, mostly affiliated with the GRU, were indicted on criminal charges by Special Counsel Robert Mueller; the indictment charged the Russians with carrying out the computer hacking and working with WikiLeaks and other organisations to spread stolen documents.''' Assange has consistently denied any connection to or co-operation with Russia in relation to the leaks, and accused the Clinton campaign of stoking "a neo-McCarthy hysteria".}} (''emphasis added'') |
|
|
|
*'''A.''' Yes he should be, in a similar way as described above or found in the the leads of ], ], ], ] |
|
|
|
|
|
*'''B.''' No he should not be, but he should be described as an authoritarian ruler, leader of an authoritarian regime, or leader of a military dictatorship somewhere in the lead, similar to the leads of ], ], ], ] |
|
Should the bolded sentence be removed? -] (]) 12:15, 14 March 2020 (UTC)}} |
|
|
|
*'''C.''' No he should not be, but some variation of "Many observers see Sisi as a dictator" should be included in the lead. |
|
''']''' |
|
|
|
*'''D. ''' No he should not be, and he should '''not''' be described as an authoritarian ruler. Instead, different arguments regarding his form of rule should be summarized in the body. |
|
|
*'''E.''' Other (please elaborate) |
|
|
] (]) 16:55, 27 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
Should the Squad be described in the article as "far left?" ] (]) 22:14, 26 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
This RfC may also apply to the pages of other political parties with similar issues. When a political party mostly adheres to a certain variant of a particular ideology, should the more general ideology be listed in addition to the specific variant in the "ideology" section of the infobox? In this case, ] is a ] party mostly adhering to ]. ] (]) 02:18, 12 March 2020 (UTC)}} |
|
|
|
''']''' |
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
Should the bottom of the infobox in this election and all elections that follow it, which use the mixed-member proportional system, show the Prime Minister and their party alone (similarly to other Westminster systems, such as ], ], and ]), or the Cabinet and its member parties (similarly to other systems that have coalition governments, such as ], ], and ])? ] (]) 13:37, 26 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
Are geonotices such as (requested by {{u|EllenCT}}, added by {{u|Deryck Chan}}, full request ]) appropriate? It requests users to "Please send email asking the US government to require open access to federally supported research." My opinion is that '''no''', it is not okay to use Misplaced Pages for political activism, regardless of how noble the cause. I've asked for removal, but I doubt the geonotice request page gets much traffic, so in the mean time, I think this is probably worth bringing up here to get some wider input. –] (] • ]) 13:49, 11 March 2020 (UTC)}} |
|
|
|
''']''' |
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
What should the infobox indicate as the location of the hostilities? |
|
I see there has been some back-and-forth with the infobox. This is an RfC exclusively regarding the ] for the ]. There is currently a ] for the ]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*'''Option 1''' - ] and ], ] |
|
The question is:<br> |
|
|
|
*'''Option 2''' - ] |
|
'''Should candidates other than Trump be included in the infobox?''' |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please enter Option 1 or Option 2, followed by a brief statement, in the Survey. Do not reply to other users in the Survey. Back-and-forth discussion may be conducted in the Discussion section. ]] 16:18, 19 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
The options are:<br> |
|
|
|
''']''' |
|
'''A - Include all candidates who have received delegates.'''<br> |
|
|
'''B - Include all candidates who have reached a certain other threshold (e.g. 5% popular vote). Please specify the threshold you prefer.'''<br> |
|
|
'''C - Keep Trump only.'''<br> |
|
|
|
|
|
– ] (]) 06:09, 11 March 2020 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
This a request for comment on the above question and previous section. Is the Mackinac Center for Public Policy a Conservative group and should be described as such? And does the polices listed above overrule the more widely available references describing their relationships and them as Conservative vs Free-Market? ] (]) 02:35, 18 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
Should the lede and infobox say that this institution is "public" or "state-related?" ] (]) 05:20, 10 March 2020 (UTC)}} |
|
|
|
''']''' |
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
'''RfC question:''' Should United States presidential election results tables be displayed in standard chronological order or reverse chronological order? – ] (] • ]) 22:59, 8 March 2020 (UTC)}} |
|
Should the Riverina chapter of the NSN be included in the infobox? ] (]) 16:11, 17 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
''']''' |
|
''']''' |
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
Should the article include the guard’s actions (grabbing the camera lens and touching Hersant’s shoulder) and the court’s findings regarding Sewell’s claims on racial motivation and self-defence? |
|
In articles about Taiwanese political parties, should left–right position be replaced with cross-Strait position? ] (]) 11:46, 7 March 2020 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
Should the subject of this article be capitalized (Antifa) or not (antifa)? ] (]) 07:19, 7 March 2020 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
As seen above on this page, ] has been disputed numerous times due to strong disagreements in whether the names of political offices should be capitalised in the lead sentences of political office articles and elsewhere following the article/modifier. A retrospective analysis of 19 of these discussions dating back to 2011 (above) showed that the overall view is against the guideline as it reads now by approximately 2:1, but no discussion has ever been able to come to a reasonable solution. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
] (]) 15:08, 17 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
Should the Manual of Style section be removed entirely as a guideline that does not have "general" support? (A substitute can be added later if it does have general support.) <span style="background-color:#c4c4c4;border-radius:8px;padding:0px 2px;">]</span> <span style="color:#000;font-weight:bold;font-size:.8em;">(])</span> 18:46, 6 March 2020 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
''']''' |
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
The current lead contains a simple mention of Trumpism. Should a brief description be added to this mention? A proposed wording for the added text, which is also up for debate here: {{tq|characterized by ], "]" nationalism, and economic ].}} — ] (]) 04:51, 16 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
Should the lead section of ] include the following? |
|
|
|
''']''' |
|
*A clause in the sentence on Reagan's first term stating that during said term he {{gt|largely ignored the burgeoning ]}}. |
|
|
*A sentence (immediately preceding the ones on USSR) stating {{gt|Reagan resisted calls for stringent sanctions against the ] regime in South Africa and vetoed a ] but was overridden by Congress.}} |
|
|
Citations for both additions would be placed in the article body in the respective sections for AIDS (which includes the relevant sources listed immediately below) and Apartheid (which was ]). ] (]) 05:43, 6 March 2020 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
The RfC is whether to retain or remove Syrian mercenaries from the belligerents section of the infobox. ] (]) 02:58, 10 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
Which description is more suitable here? |
|
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
|
|
A) She is a climate change denialist. |
|
|
|
|
|
B) She is a climate change skeptic. |
|
|
|
|
|
C) She is a climate change denier. |
|
|
|
|
|
--] (]) 04:10, 6 March 2020 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
Is the Syrian civil war over? ] (]) 00:52, 9 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
This is an Rfc exclusively regarding the infobox template for the ]. Previously, there was an Rfc about state pages, and this does not affect that result.<br> |
|
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
|
|
The question is:<br> |
|
|
'''Should withdrawn candidates that have delegates (Buttigieg, Klobuchar, Bloomberg) and candidates still in but with no possible path to victory (Gabbard) still be included in the infobox?''' |
|
|
|
|
|
The options are:<br> |
|
|
'''A - Remove all withdrawn candidates and candidates with no possible path.'''<br> |
|
|
'''B - Remove withdrawn candidates but keep all candidates still in the race. Possibly with a 5% threshold?'''<br> |
|
|
'''C - Keep as is.'''<br> |
|
|
'''D - Other.'''<br> |
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks all! ] (]) 23:28, 4 March 2020 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
I'm opening a new RfC in an attempt to permanently solve this dispute. Should the Estado Novo regime be considered fascist? -- ] (]) 23:44, 8 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
Should the lead include mention of the fact that the Republican Party shifted its racial and geographical composition to the South and White Americans after the successes of the Civil Rights movement in the 60s, and that the party appealed to racial conservatism after the passage of the 1964 Civil Rights Act? |
|
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
|
|
The text in question would summarize the "Composition" section of the body, and would reflect the contents of more than a dozen peer-reviewed studies on the matter. <small><sup>RfC expired and extended by ] (]) at 23:25, 2 March 2020 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
Debate is ongoing as to whether content should be included in this article. This RfC covers two questions: |
|
This is related to ] to rename/reformat {{tl|Masculinism}} and {{tl|Masculism sidebar}} that failed to reach consensus. To wit, should these templates be reformatted to reflect their focus on the ] instead of ]? —] (]) 22:43, 29 February 2020 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
Should we mention that Ocasio-Cortez described the report from the Politico magazine as anti-semitic?--] (]) 23:02, 27 February 2020 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
The purpose of this ] is to determine what the article should state is the legal status of bestiality in ]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*'''Question 1:''' Should this article mention the John Conyers report "What Went Wrong In Ohio" |
|
Shall the table show, for ]: |
|
|
|
*'''Question 2:''' If so, what wording should be used? |
|
|
|
|
|
'''] ]''' 18:22, 2 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
'''A.''' |
|
|
{{!}} {{flagicon|Germany}} ] |
|
|
{{!}} ] Illegal |
|
|
|
|
|
Or |
|
|
|
|
|
'''B.''' |
|
|
{{!}} {{flagicon|Germany}} ] |
|
|
{{!}} ] Legal, unless forced, in which case ] Illegal |
|
|
|
|
|
? |
|
|
|
|
|
Answer A or B in the Survey. Conduct back-and-forth discussion in the Threaded Discussion section. ] (]) 05:09, 26 February 2020 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
This is a two part RfC. |
|
|
|
|
|
A. Prior to a caucus or primary, should candidates only be included in the infoboxes of primary and caucus articles if they are polling at an average of 5% or above on FiveThirtyEight.com? |
|
|
|
|
|
B. After a caucus or primary, should candidates only be included in the infoboxes of primary and caucus articles if they have won delegates in that contest? |
|
|
- ]] 🖋 01:43, 26 February 2020 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
Should the abbreviation ''WaPo'' be placed in the first sentence? ]<sup>]</sup> 05:20, 24 February 2020 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
There is a disagreement about the link label to provide for the incumbent parliament, given in the "Incumbents" section near the top of the page. Should it be labelled as: |
|
|
:'''A.''' ] – ]? |
|
|
:'''B.''' ] – ]? |
|
|
:'''C.''' Other (please offer suggestions)? |
|
|
<small>RfC relisted by ] (]) at 23:27, 22 February 2020 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
Should the article include the February 13-15 Point Blank Political poll? - ]] 🖋 14:53, 22 February 2020 (UTC)}} |
|
|
{{RFC list footer|pol|hide_instructions={{{hide_instructions}}} }} |
|
{{RFC list footer|pol|hide_instructions={{{hide_instructions}}} }} |